Third Session FRIDAY, DECEMBER 3, 1926, AT 10:00 A. M.: V S BUI Eau of Puilic Roads, Washvn Ton, D C
Third Session FRIDAY, DECEMBER 3, 1926, AT 10:00 A. M.: V S BUI Eau of Puilic Roads, Washvn Ton, D C
Third Session FRIDAY, DECEMBER 3, 1926, AT 10:00 A. M.: V S BUI Eau of Puilic Roads, Washvn Ton, D C
Streets within city limits, sharp turns, steep grades, bndges, and
schools and churches along the route. The problems caused by these
conditions, however, while often perplexing and obj'ectionable, can
usually be solved and should not be allowed to obscure or dominate
the solution of the major situation
C A R R Y I N G C A P A C I T Y O F H I G H W A Y S AS A F F E C T E D B Y W I D T H O F
S U R F A C E AND R E S T R I C T I O N S O F U S B
T H E R E L A T I O N B E T W E E N V O L U M E O F T R A F F I C AND POPULATION
AND T H E R E L A T I O N B E T W E E N V O L U M E O F T R A F F I C
AND I N D U S T R I E S S E R V E D
From the fact that highway traffic is largely local, it follows that
the volume of traffic will vary in some degree with the density of
population adjacent to the road
This is a general condition and traffic relations developed in
Pennsylvania will probably be approximated in other States.
The average motor-vehicle tnp is about thirty miles, and the
counties are practicable traffic study units.
268 HIGHWAY RESEARCH BOARD
T H E L A R G E V E H I C L E AND T H E H E A V Y W H E E L LOAD, I N C L U D I N G
T H E S E M I - T R A I L E R AND T H E S I X - W H E E L B U S
The evidence obtained in Ohio indicates that even when the gross
load limitation is comparatively low the number of trailers and six-
wheel trucks in operation is relatively small. This seems to indicate
that tonnage which might be carried on larger trucks is now carried
on a greater number of small trucks.
In the Cook County transport survey it was found that approxi-
mately two and one-half per cent of all trucks (observed on Cook
County highways had trailers attached. The percentage of trucks
with trailers attached varied from zero at some places on the highway
system to 10 and 14 per cent at others. The gross load limitation
in Cook County at that time was 24,000 pounds.
Apparently the use of trailers depends very largely upon special
movements and local conditions.
It has been brought out, principally in previous studies by the
U. S. Bureau of Public Roads, that the tensile stress set up in a con-
crete pavement is twice as great with a four-wheel truck as with a
six-wheel truck of the same gross load.
In both six and four-wheel trucks the maximum tensile stress
occurs in the bottom of the slab, this being the critical stress for
both types of trucks.
A load passing over a pavement 21 inches from the edge produced
an average stress less than 50 per cent as great as the same load 9
inches from the edge. The pavement in this case was of uniform
thickness.
Present maximum permitted loads vary widely in different States,
as for example:
Ohio 20,000 lbs.
Pennsylvania 26,000 "
Illinois 25,000 "
City of Chicago 30,000 "
Indiana 28,000 "
C L A S S I F I C A T I O N O F H I G H W A Y S I N R E F E R E N C E TO R I G H T O F W A Y
AS F U N C T I O N S O F T R A F F I C V O L U M E AND K I N D
in Deciding Road Width " In this article Dean Johnson shows that
traffic discharge depends on speed and spacing of vehicles, and as-
serted that 1,000 vehicles per hour is not too large for a two-lane road
There have arisen two schools of thought as to required nght of
way particularly in reference to extremely heavy traffic routes On
one side it is argued that this problem should be solved by the so-
called superhighway, providing two lines of pavement each having
several traffic lanes On the other side it is argued that it is better
to provide parallel routes rather than extreme widths on a few main
routes In this latter case it is pointed out that abutting real estate
values are increased enormously by road improvement, especially
along heavy traffic routes, and that these benefits in the improve-
ment of parallel routes are in excess of those adjacent to one main
artery. Traffic is endeavoring to reach some particular objective—
in general, a large center of population—^rather than to occupy any
particular route This may signify that near large centers of popu-
lation there is need of a greater number of converging routes to
handle the traffic. These routes as they go farther and farther away
from the center of population become more widely separated, and the
traffic on them decreases correspondingly. The width of right of
way and the design of the pavement will naturally change to corre-
spond with this change in traffic.
If the facts in any case indicate the need for wider widths in the
near future, provision should be made for acquiring these widths be-
fore the property increases so largely in value as to add unduly to
the cost of future improvement
The effect of the kind of traffic on width of nght of way is more
or less a local problem The chief factor in this respect enters when
truck traffic is large This condition exists in general only near large
centers of population Where the amount of truck traffic justifies,
it may be advisable to provide an extra lane or a separate trucking
route for this slow-moving traffic.
In practice the width of right of way which is being acqmred in
various States has depended largely upon land values If land is
cheap, comparatively large widths can be obtained, and are obtained,
even on routes which are comparatively unimportant However, if
land values are high, the cost of the right of way is an important
sizeable proportion of the total cost of the improvement It is, there-
fore, economical in these cases to keep the width of right of way to
a mmimum which will still give roadway sufficient to handle the
traffic Here again is cited an example of what is done in States
where land values are high, that is, the road design is materially
PROCEEDINGS OF SIXTH ANNUAL MEETING 373
PLANNING T H E I M P R O V E M E N T O F S T A T E H I G H W A Y SYSTEMS
T H E P R I N C I P A L F U N C T I O N O F A H I G H W A Y T R A N S P O R T A T I O N SUR-
V E Y I N PLANNING A PROGRAM O F H I G H W A Y I M P R O V E M E N T
of the City streets that join State routes at city limits, to make pro-
vision for "by-passing" congested traffic areas, to eliminate obstruc-
tions to the easier movement of traffic, and finally to provide a plan
of belt, arterial and secondary local traffic routes to facilitate the
rapid, safe, and unobstructed flow of traffic m congested traffic areas
In the final analysis the worth of a transportation survey and the
resul'tmg plan of highway improvement is measured by the actual
highway construction, reconstruction, and widening program which
is carried into effect over a penod of years.
The State highway engineer, as the executive director of the public
business of providing highways, is responsible first, for the analysis
of the traffic demand for his product on the vanous sections of the
State system, second, for a financial analysis of the yearly cost, the
revenues required, the funds available, and the establishment of a
budget for the period of the improvement program; third, for the
busmess and engineering management of the improvement program
The major limiting factor is the financial program provided by
the legislative organization responsible for raising the revenue to
enact into reality any plan of highway improvement, and therefore
a large part of the responsibility for the character and extent of a
State system of highway improvements rests not upon the State de-
partment charged with the duty of constructing highways, but upon
the department of State government responsible for the raising of
highway funds