The Anthropocene Reviewed
The Anthropocene Reviewed
The Anthropocene Reviewed
eGrove
8-23-2022
Recommended Citation
Green, John, "The Anthropocene Reviewed" (2022). Common Reading Experience. 12.
https://egrove.olemiss.edu/umreads/12
This Book is brought to you for free and open access by the Writing and Rhetoric at eGrove. It has been accepted
for inclusion in Common Reading Experience by an authorized administrator of eGrove. For more information,
please contact egrove@olemiss.edu.
Table of Contents
Page Number
1. Using The Anthropocene Reviewed in the Classroom 2
6. Appendix 26
● Sample rubrics
● Develop critical thinking, reading, writing, and research skills and abilities
● Gain an emerging sense of confidence as learners, thinkers, readers, and writers
● Develop a sense of community among peers, neighbors, and instructors
● Develop connections among ideas, experiences, disciplines, and academic and
personal goals
● Relate the issues raised by the common book to their lives as new or returning
students.
● Preview The Anthropocene Reviewed with students. Introduce the book during class.
Explain how the book will be used in the course and how it will help students meet
learning outcomes. Share your own excitement about the book, perhaps describing some
favorite passages, events, or people.
● Help students understand the depth of reading required. Display a passage, and model
critical reading strategies such as text annotation and marginalia.
As students read:
● Provide focused questions for students to consider while they are reading. Ask them to
respond to those questions in writing before the next class.
● Use class time and activities to build on, rather than summarize, the reading assignment.
● At the start of class, assign a one-minute paper in which students identify both the most
crucial part of the reading assignment and an unanswered question they have about the
reading assignment.
● During the first few minutes of class, ask students to write about links between the
reading assignment and the topic being discussed in class.
● Distribute one or two questions that build on the reading assignment. Use the
think-pair-share protocol. Students first consider the question(s) on their own. Then they
discuss the question(s) with a partner. Finally, they share their results with the class.
● For instance, you might prioritize that students understand what they read.
● Then you might select a couple of scenes or events in the book that seem important or
interesting (or even puzzling – just because you are leading class discussion does not
mean you need to have all the possible answers).
● Perhaps you have selected several themes in the essays as your focus. You might choose
scenes that relate to pop culture, mental health, or the natural world.
● You might also ask students to respond to a specific quotation or passage.
● Jot down a few notes so you can access them easily during your class discussion.
● Annotate your own text.
● Establish respect. Class discussion is a time for exploration, and the classroom is a safe
environment for students to say what they are thinking. Remind students of the first rule
of the University creed: “I believe in respect for the dignity of each person.” Be sure
students are listening carefully to each speaker and taking his or her ideas seriously.
● Before discussion, ask students to reflect on a directed, yet open, question in a five- to
ten-minute writing. Encourage students to keep writing throughout the allotted time even
if they run out of things to say. They will surprise themselves with this unstructured
writing. This writing is not a quiz with one correct answer. Ask them questions such as
“What do you think is the significance of X?”; “How has X changed over time?”; “Why
did X do what he or she did?” You could also ask them to do a close reading of a
particular passage, perhaps even comparing it to another passage.
● Avoid general questions such as “What did you think of the reading for today?” or “What
did you find interesting?” These can be dead-end questions that will lead to short
discussions.
● To mix things up, you may also have them work together in small groups to find
discussion starters or answers to your questions.
● Different classes have different personalities. Just make sure the environment in which
students speak is a safe one, and continue to encourage discussion in different ways if
something is not working.
● Some students will direct their comments just to you. Encourage them to talk to each
other.
● If you had them write a response, invite students to share what they wrote.
● If you had them work in groups, invite representatives from each group to share what
they found.
● Encourage students to point to specifics in the text. Ask them where they see what they
see.
● Invite students to read sections out loud.
● Be open to where the conversation takes you. Sometimes students will pick up on details
that you didn’t see.
● Try not to let the class discussion go over fifteen to twenty minutes. Students are most
productive in that time frame.
● At the end of the discussion, recap the major points made or ask students to do so.
● Course-specific discussion prompts are included in the course-specific sections of this
guide.
Remember that the common read discussion should always serve your course outcomes. If a
student raises an issue with which you have no expertise or are uncomfortable tackling, you
might respond by explaining the topic is more suited for discussion in a different course (such as
English, Sociology, or Political Science). For example, you might say, “[Controversy X] is an
important issue, and it’s one that you can study in depth in [Course Y]. [Course Y] is taught by
an expert in that field. For the purposes of this course, let’s keep the focus on [your course
outcome Z].” Additional guidelines are below.
The following guidelines may be helpful for facilitating planned discussions of controversial
issues:
1. Articulate a clear purpose for the discussion (for example, how the discussion is
related to course objectives).
2. Establish ground rules, such as listening without interrupting the speaker,
questioning ideas rather than criticizing individuals, offering at least one piece of
evidence to support each point made, using “I” statements rather than “you” statements.
3. Be an active facilitator by redirecting students who are off topic or participating too
actively, ensuring students are not put on the spot as spokespersons for certain groups,
providing opportunities for all students to participate (orally or through writing), and
being attuned to students’ emotions.
4. Summarize the discussion at the end of class and obtain student feedback.
1. A class focusing on the theme of human impact on the planet might look like this:
a. Individually, students identify and write about a passage that illustrates the theme of
human impact on the planet. (five to seven minutes)
b. As a class, students discuss the passages they have chosen. (ten to fifteen minutes)
c. With partners, students list why human impact on the planet is important to
individuals, communities, and the world. (five to ten minutes)
d. Student pairs report their findings to the entire class. (ten to fifteen minutes)
e. Homework: Students write a personal appreciation of a place substantially impacted
by humans. It could be somewhere in their hometowns, a place on campus, an area
they have visited, etc. After describing why the place has personal value for them,
students should discuss the value of that spot to the larger community.
These small group exercises may help students develop critical thinking skills.
1. Green references etymology, directly and indirectly, often in The Anthropocene Reviewed.
Some of the words he examines are difficult, such as “graupel” (217). Others are more common
words that most people wouldn’t look up or research, such as “believe” (254). Why is Green
interested in etymology? Why can it be valuable to research commonly used words such as
“believe”? In small groups, select a review from the book and read it together. Then, decide on
two-three words to examine more closely. You might choose one difficult word and one more
common word to research. Look up the etymology of your chosen words, and then discuss what
you discovered. Make an argument in which you cover your findings, including what you learned
and how the work helps your understanding of language and communication.
3. The Anthropocene era is often characterized as a doomsday scenario with little hope for
recovery or adaptation. In a CNN interview, John Green explains he wrote The Anthropocene
Reviewed as a “way to write myself back toward hope.” Similarly, some scientists and climate
activists are trying to reframe the era as hopeful. Watch natural resource scientist Elena
Bennett’s address to the World Economic Forum, “Identifying Successful Socio-Ecological
Initiatives,” and visit the website she has helped to develop, Seeds of Good Anthropocenes.
Divide into groups and use the site’s interactive map to choose one of the organizations identified
as a seed. Do a little research on the organization and then answer the following questions.
4. Green’s review “Three Farmers on Their Way to a Dance” contains some deep thinking about
photos and how we view them differently over time. In the case of the titular photo in the review,
the young men were soon to go off to war where one of them would die and the other two would
be wounded. Green also recalls a photo of his friends and their children all huddled together with
his family in the weeks before COVID-19 changed the way most people interacted. Read over
the review as a class, and then divide into small groups. Each group should choose one of the
following photos to examine:
● What does the photo make you think and feel? Why?
● What are the purposes of photos?
● What do you take photos of? Why?
● Why does Green quote Kurt Vonnegut’s words “[h]istory is merely a list of surprises” in
the review?
● Is Green correct that how we view a photo changes over time? Why or why not? Why
does this matter in understanding ourselves and what we choose to document?
5. To encourage readers to think about what we value and why, Green begins “Kentucky
Bluegrass” with a scenario of aliens asking why humans worship verdant lawns. This opener is a
variation of the “tour guide for an alien” critical thinking exercise. As a class, read over Green’s
scenario (165) and discuss its effectiveness as an opener for the essay. Then divide into small
groups and try out the exercise for yourself by following the directions below (adapted from
ThoughtCo):
Your group is conducting a tour for aliens visiting earth to observe human life. As you
ride along in a blimp, viewing the landscape below, you float over the Grove and
Vaught-Hemingway stadium on game day. One of the aliens looks down and is confused.
You explain that an SEC football game is in progress. The alien asks several important
questions: What’s a game? What’s a team? Why are the teams in divisions? Why are
there no female players? Why do people get so excited watching other people play
games? Why can’t the people in the seats go on the field and join in? Why are people
sitting in the Grove in tents?
With your group members, try to answer the questions as fully as possible. Share your
group’s answers with the class and then discuss the assumptions and values that underlie
the answers. Why do humans value sports? Why do we support a certain team? Why do
we insist on winners and losers? Why are we fascinated with elite athletes? Why do we
tailgate?
In The Anthropocene Reviewed, Green features the review “CNN” in which he recalls watching
coverage of the U.S. invasion of Iraq in 2003. At one point, the camera focused on a house
featuring graffiti in Arabic while the reporter spoke of the “anger in the street, and the hatred”
(132). Green’s roommate Hassan, who spoke Arabic, began to laugh because the graffiti spelled
out “Happy birthday, sir, despite the circumstances” (132). Green gives CNN just two stars, but
the message about news services and human communication stretches more broadly than just that
network. Re-read the review, and consider why many people would assume that the graffiti
spelled out something negative or hateful. What is Green saying about communication, a global
community, and understanding others? Later in the review, Green writes, “I imagine lives that
feel different from mine monolithically” (132). What does he mean here, and how does it apply
to us all as people who share the planet? What are the benefits of understanding others who
differ from us? What are the complications? What does Green want readers to think about at the
individual level? Compose a thesis-driven essay in which you examine Green’s intent and make
an argument about community and understanding. Be sure to cite the text.
Definition of Anthropocene
The Anthropocene is the proposed, unofficial term for the current geologic period when human
activity has been the dominant force on the planet. The National Geographic Resource Library
has a succinct discussion of the origins of the term and its current status among geologists.
2. “Bonneville Salt Flats” – This story is about a lake that transformed into salt flats. Think
about all of the different iterations of yourself and the path that brought you to UM.
Knowing everything you know now, what would you tell the younger version(s) of
yourself?
3. “Scratch ’n’ Sniff Stickers” – This story is about childhood longing. Think about the
nostalgia of home. Is there something in your life that transports you back to a specific
space and time? Reflect on these feelings in relation to your new home at UM.
6. “You’ll Never Walk Alone” – This story is about the crowd experience. While you are an
individual at UM, you are sharing these four years with other groups such as other
freshmen, others in your major or school, and/or others in your student groups. Write
about a time at UM when you felt as though you were part of a larger collective and not
walking alone.
7. “Three Farmers on Their Way to a Dance” – This story is about the known and unknown.
First, it’s about three farmers on their way to a dance, but they do not know they are on
their way to war as well. You are also experiencing a transitional moment in your life.
Think about a picture that was taken in the last year. What were your expectations and
goals in relation to where you are now? (Bonus: Share the picture with the class.)
8. “Academic Decathlon” – This story is about rising to the occasion as part of a team, and
it shows that all team members are important and contribute to the success of the
collective. Write about an experience in which you exceeded your own expectations.
9. “The Hot Dogs of Bæjarins Beztu Pylsur” – This story is about an experience meeting (or
exceeding) the expectations of that experience. Think about your journey at UM so far.
How has the experience met the hype?
10. “Auld Lang Syne” - This story is about longing for something past. Think about
something in your life that you would miss if it were not there. Write about the kind of
longing that is related in this story with regard to that subject.
2. Talk Response: The Anthropocene Reviewed is also a podcast that can be found on all
major podcast platforms. Listen to the episode from September 19, 2019, “QWERTY and
the Kauaʻi ʻōʻō.” The Kauaʻi ʻōʻō is an extinct bird. In this story, John Green recounts
3. Vignette Writing Assignment: All of the stories in The Anthropocene Reviewed connect
humans as a collective. Think about your life both before UM and now, during your first
semester at UM. Connections to other humans are a backdrop to our everyday lives.
Often, we are walking through it, but not connecting ourselves to that experience. How
can you connect your life experiences to people around you? Write a vignette
(experience) that you can intentionally connect to the people around you.
CLASS ACTIVITIES
1. Welcome Week: Pick a welcome week activity for your class to do together or in groups.
Have the students write a reflection and rate the experience.
2. Scavenger Hunt: Have your class complete the scavenger hunt in groups while
following the directions for that activity. After they have completed it, have them write a
reflection about the experience and rate the experience.
3. Walk in Bailey’s Woods: Meet your class there and enjoy a meditative, silent walk
through Bailey’s Woods. Have the students write a reflection and rate the experience.
Definition of Anthropocene
The Anthropocene is the proposed, unofficial term for the current geologic period when human
activity has been the dominant force on the planet. The National Geographic Resource Library
has a succinct discussion of the origins of the term and its current status among geologists.
Discussion Starters
1. The Anthropocene Reviewed began as a podcast before Green turned it into a full-length book.
Listen to one of the episodes, and then read the same section of the book. What are the
differences? Why do you suppose some parts have been changed, even slightly? What are the
complications in turning a podcast into a book?
2. In a June 10, 2021 review of The Anthropocene Reviewed for The Michigan Daily, Meera S.
Kumar claims that Green “writes with such unconditional love for the world.” What does she
mean by this? Do you agree or disagree? Why? Point to an example of a review from the book to
explore Kumar’s assessment.
3. In “The Notes” (279-93), Green shares his inspirations for the reviews and thanks the
individuals who helped him, including a middle school teacher who complimented his writing
4. Near the end of “Viral Meningitis,” Green considers human beings’ ability to listen and
empathize. He writes, “The challenge and responsibility of personhood, it seems to me, is to
recognize personhood in others – to listen to others’ pain and take it seriously, even when you
yourself cannot feel it” (203). Why do you think Green uses the words “challenge” and
“responsibility” in this passage? How well do you think you listen to and empathize with others?
How well do you think we empathize with others as a country? What are the benefits of listening
and empathizing?
5. The Anthropocene Reviewed features 44 titled reviews as part of the regular text. The book
also features three hidden reviews. Find and read the hidden reviews. Why do you think Green
includes them? Is it for comedic effect or something more serious? What do the hidden reviews
add or take away from the book as a whole? Why?
6. Reviewer Samantha Penn says The Anthropocene Reviewed is not a “pick up and read
project” but rather a “bathroom reader or coffee table book” where a reader should “jump
around . . . and pick a topic that sound[s] interesting.” How is reading a book of essays different
from reading a full-length book, like a novel or a biography? How did you approach reading this
book?
7. The subtitle of the book is “Essays on a Human-Centered Planet.” Would you describe our
planet as “human-centered”? Why, or why not?
8. Despite beginning the review “Indianapolis” (159-63) sounding less than impressed with the
city, even once playing with the motto “Indianapolis: You gotta live somewhere,” Green goes on
to explain the benefits of living there. He ends the review by giving the city four out of five stars.
How would you review your hometown? How many stars would you give it? Why? Do you feel
like most others from the place would agree? Why?
Reflection Prompts
1. Green often uses pop culture as a jumping off point for his essays (“Diet Dr Pepper,” “Scratch
’n’ Sniff Stickers,” “You’ll Never Walk Alone”). What pop culture items might you choose to
write about. Why? What’s the fascination for you?
2. In the essay “The Yips” (139-44), Green uses the stories of tennis player Ana Ivanovic and
baseball player Rick Ankiel to examine the human capacity for change and accommodation.
What tendencies or aspects of human nature intrigue you? What stories come to mind in relation
to those tendencies?
4. In “Bonneville Salt Flats” (185-90), Green writes about visiting a natural wonder for the first
time. What are the natural wonders you would like to see but haven’t yet? Why do they interest
you?
5. In “Canada Geese” (55-59), Green writes about geese as part nuisance/part wonder. What
natural phenomena do you feel ambivalence toward? Why?
6. In the “Postscript” to The Anthropocene Reviewed, Green writes that for him “reading and
rereading are an everlasting apprenticeship” (272). Reflect on your own reading habits. Have
they changed in college? Why or why not? Is rereading important to you as a student? Why or
why not? If you feel you are a good reader, what helps you? If not, what can you do to be a better
reader? And why does being a good reader matter?
7. The Anthropocene Reviewed is a series of reviews based on the five-star scale. Practice writing
your own review by reflecting on your time in college and your college-level writing so far.
What have been the positive and negative experiences? How have you been challenged and
evolved as a writer and learner? Why is growing as a writer important to you as you progress in
college? Finish your reflection by assigning your experiences up until now a value on the
five-star scale.
8. In “Academic Decathlon” (89-94), Green covers how he came to join his high school’s team
and how that team, by rule, featured students with GPAs ranging from excellent to average. One
of Green’s points, whether directly or indirectly, is that you don’t have to be an “A” student to be
intelligent and to be an interested learner. During his time on the academic decathlon team,
Green started to earn better grades through better study skills and by building confidence. Reflect
on ways you can become a better student and gain from the experiences in your writing and other
classes. How does writing help you become a better learner and student? How much do grades
matter to you and why? Are grades always a reflection of how much you learn and grow from
academic experiences? Why or why not? How might better study skills help you in ways beyond
grades?
9. Green is a co-founder of the educational video YouTube channel Crash Course. Watch the
following video about writing papers:
https://thecrashcourse.com/courses/papers-essays-crash-course-study-skills-9/. Then, reflect on
what you watched. Do you already use some of the approaches covered in the video? If so, what?
How do the approaches work for you? If not, what did you learn that you might try on future
papers? Why did certain ideas stand out to you from the video?
11. On page 11, Green includes a footnote explaining that he has been a fan of the Liverpool
Football Club for years. Read the footnote, and think about your own preferences and beliefs.
Where did they come from? Can you trace any of them to a specific childhood interaction like
Green does?
12. Green has a curious mind, something that is of great benefit to college students. He makes a
habit of noticing, questioning, and exploring the world around him. Those habits can be built and
improved through practice. Start with these questions: What surprised you or aroused your
curiosity today? What do you already know about that topic or idea? What more do you want to
know? Where or how would you start learning more?
Assignment:
In The Anthropocene Reviewed, John Green combines personal narrative and researched
information. For this project, you will be doing something similar. We’ll be using The
Anthropocene Reviewed as a model and inspiration to create a collection of three 1-2 page
narratives. Please choose three (3) of the following prompts to guide your narratives:
● Using “Scratch ’n’ Sniff Stickers,” one of your narratives should explore how a specific
smell is connected with an experience (positive, negative, or a complicated mixture of
both) that has stuck with you and shaped you in some way. What do you want the reader
to take away from reading about this experience?
● Using “Velociraptors,” one narrative should explore a memory of when you discovered
something that you had thought was “real” or “true” that you learned from pop culture
actually was not accurate according to science, history, or sociology, etc. What is
significant about this discovery that you want to share with your reader?
● Using “Academic Decathlon,” one of your narratives should explore how your
relationship with a specific person has helped shape your identity. How have they taught
you something that has stayed with you? What message do you want your reader to
understand about who you are?
● Using “Harvey” and/or “Auld Lang Syne,” one narrative should explore how a specific
piece of pop culture helped you when you were in a negative or challenging place in your
life. What was this movie, TV/streaming show, or song? How did it help you cope and
make things seem more manageable?
As a class we will read and discuss many of the essays from The Anthropocene Reviewed, but we
won’t have time for all of them--you may want to read more on your own to get a better
understanding of Green’s style and for more inspiration. At the end of each of your narratives,
rate the experiences/topics of your narratives like Green does at the end of each of his essays.
Based on your message, or the significance of what you explore, the “why” of your rating should
be clear to your reader.
Your narratives will need to be multimodal. This means that you will need to have at least one
other mode of communication besides written text. For example, you may decide to include
images or video/audio clips. But, you are also encouraged to challenge yourself and try out a
format/style/software/platform that you haven’t used before. However, each narrative should
include 1-2 pages of written text.
You can also include researched information like Green does if you would like. If you decide to
include outside sources, you’ll want to add links in your narrative to your sources. We will
discuss how to properly cite sources via hyperlinks in class.
You will peer review each of the narratives; however, feel free to schedule a session with the
Writing Center and/or conference with me for extra support.
1. Practice critical reading, mentor text analysis, synthesis, argument, integrating sources, and
reflection.
Studying techniques used by other writers is a great way to improve your own writing. Choose
one of Green’s reviews you found particularly effective. Examine the review closely by
responding to the following questions (adapted from the Iowa Reading Research Center):
● In five sentences or less, describe the main point and content of the review.
● From what point of view was this review written? How would the text change if written
from a different point of view?
● What do you notice about the review’s structure or organization? Can you be specific
about what text structure was used (e.g., description, cause and effect,
comparison/contrast, order/sequence, problem-solution)? What was Green trying to
accomplish overall with the review, and how did his text structure choices help with that?
● What do you notice about the word choice in the review? Identify a word or phrase Green
uses effectively. Why did he use that word or phrase? What was he trying to accomplish?
● Identify another technique Green uses in the review. What did you like about this
technique? How might this technique influence the reader?
● Describe the technique or approach Green uses for the first paragraph of the review. Why
did he choose that technique or approach?
● Describe the technique or approach Green uses for ending the review. Why did he choose
that technique or approach?
Following your analysis of Green’s choices, prepare to write your own review, using Green’s
review as a mentor text. You might choose the same subject or an entirely new one. As you work
on your review, consult your analysis of Green’s review. Which of Green’s strategies or
techniques might help you? In writing the review, also keep in mind the core elements of Green’s
reviews (definition of subject, basic research, personal connections, rating). For more
information on those core elements, see Lincolnwood Library’s Fandom Kit.
2. Practice critical reading, audience analysis, text analysis, argument, integrating sources,
comparison/contrast, and reflection.
Reading an essay collection is an interesting experience. Some of the essays really resonate with
a specific reader. Others, not so much. Delve into this experience for yourself. Choose two
reviews from the book, one you liked a lot and one you didn’t care for. Analyze the essays in
terms of your reading experience. What did you respond to in the one you liked? What was
unfavorable about the one that fell flat? What did John Green do (or not do) in each review that
prompted your reaction? Then, analyze yourself as a reader. Which of your personal
characteristics might have affected your response? Which of your life experiences might have
University of Mississippi Common Reading Experience Resource Guide 22 |
influenced your reaction? Finally, think about the context in which the book was written and in
which you are reading it. What forces outside of Green’s efforts and your personal characteristics
might have had an impact on your response to each text? Finally, write a thesis-driven essay in
which you analyze your reading experience of The Anthropocene Reviewed, focusing specifically
on your two chosen essays and considering Green’s strategies, your reading identity, and the
context in which the book was written and read. Be sure to cite from the text.
3. Practice critical reading, synthesis, analysis, argument, integrating sources, reflection, and
comparison/contrast.
Green quotes poets, authors, and others regularly throughout The Anthropocene Reviewed. For
example, the book is barely a page old when Green quotes author Allegra Goodman about
writing her life story. In the “Postscript,” Green even writes that the book is “maybe overfilled
with [quotes]” (272). Why does Green bring in so many other voices to his reviews of the
Anthropocene? What do we as readers gain or lose from the exposure to so many voices?
Compose a thesis-driven essay in which you select one review where Green includes at least two
quotations, and analyze how the quoted material adds to or detracts from the reading experience.
Do the quoted parts relate directly to the rating? Do they help you think about the issue more
clearly, or do they complicate your understanding? Is one quote more effective than the other(s)?
Why or why not? Make an argument about how the material impacts the reading experience, and
be sure to cite the text.
4. Practice critical reading, synthesis, analysis, argument, integrating sources, reflection, and
comparison/contrast.
The Anthropocene Reviewed covers some upsetting material such as disease, climate change,
depression, and death. However, many of the reviews feature hope as a theme, for both Green
and the human race. Compose a thesis-driven essay in which you select two reviews that you
find as hopeful, and analyze how Green uses hope to inspire readers. Why does Green want
readers to be optimistic or hopeful, even when the subject matter might not be positive? What
does Green write to inspire hope? What emotions might readers feel when reading the reviews
you selected? How are the reviews you selected similar and/or different, and why does that
matter in thinking about inspiring hope? Can reading influence changes in people’s behaviors
and/or attitudes? Make an argument about how Green tries to encourage hope in his readers and
how successful he is, and be sure to cite the text.
Reviews, by nature, are subjective. People have different reactions to movies, books, albums,
restaurants, etc. However, these things are all traditional subjects for reviews. In The
Anthropocene Reviewed, Green covers subjects such as geese, grass, whispering, sunsets, etc.
Pick one or two chapters with a focus not typically a subject(s) for review, and compose a
In a May 17, 2021 review of The Anthropocene Reviewed for the San Francisco Chronicle,
Elizabeth Greenwood writes that the book is a great read “whenever you need a reminder of what
it is to feel small and human, in the best possible way.” What does Greenwood mean when she
says the book makes readers “feel small and human”? Select two of the reviews from the book,
and compose a thesis-driven essay in which you examine how the sections might make readers
“feel small and human.” Why is this a positive experience, as Greenwood says it is? What might
readers gain by thinking about the topics in the sections you have chosen? Do the title or the
format of the book contribute to readers’ feelings? Is feeling “small and human” empowering or
humbling, or both, and why does this matter? Explore Greenwood’s assessment of the reading
experience, and be sure to cite the text.
In the “Introduction” to The Anthropocene Reviewed and in an interview with Elisabeth Egan of
The New York Times (June 10, 2021), Green says that he doesn’t “want to write in code
anymore” (2). He goes on in the NYT interview to say about writing this book that he “wanted to
try to write as myself because I’ve never done that in any formal way. I wanted to try to think
about how I was looking at the world.” One can assume that he is referring to the differences
between writing fiction and non-fiction. Consider the differences between fiction and
non-fiction. What are the benefits and drawbacks of each form? Then, do some research on
Green. Why do you think he felt that this book was the right time to make this switch? Compose
a thesis-driven essay in which you identify one review from the book that you think especially
captures Green’s desire not to write in code, and make an argument why this is. You should bring
in information from your research on Green, and be sure to cite from The Anthropocene
Reviewed.
What makes someone a good writer? Listed below are eight habits of mind, or intellectual
characteristics, that the National Council of Teachers of English identify as essential to success
in college and professional writing. Green is a successful writer. Which of these habits of mind
are exemplified in The Anthropocene Reviewed? How do these essays reveal these
characteristics? Are any of these habits of mind absent? Write an essay analyzing how the
Sample Rubrics
1 2 3 4 5
Comments:____________________________________________________________________
1 2 3 4 5
Comments:____________________________________________________________________
1 2 3 4 5
Comments:____________________________________________________________________
1 2 3 4 5
Comments:____________________________________________________________________
1 2 3 4 5
Comments:____________________________________________________________________
This team member contributed fairly to the creation of the presentation. Yes No
If no, please explain:
___________________________________________________________________________
This team member contributed fairly to the creation of the presentation. Yes No
If no, please explain:
___________________________________________________________________________
This team member contributed fairly to the creation of the presentation. Yes No
If no, please explain:
___________________________________________________________________________
This team member contributed fairly to the creation of the presentation. Yes No
If no, please explain:
___________________________________________________________________________
Other comments or concerns about your group and how you worked together? (use back)
SCORE: _____________
CONVENTIONS/MECHANICS
Ineffective Partially-effective Effective
Multiple errors in writing hamper Minimal errors in standard English, The writing meets guidelines for
communication, and text does not grammar, punctuation, and/or usage standard English grammar,
demonstrate standard English are present in some of the writing, punctuation, and usage, with very
grammar, punctuation, and/or and/or the text does not meet few minor errors present. Meets
usage, and/or does not meet the requirements for assignment length requirements for assignment length
requirements for length and format. and/or format. and format.
D/F C B
INFORMATION PRESENTED
Ineffective Partially-effective Effective Exceptional
Does not introduce or Demonstrates only Introduces and integrates Demonstrates
integrate information minimal or ineffective information relevant to exceptionally strong,
relevant to the use of integrating the topic/event. Writing integrated information
topic/event, or includes information relevant to addresses details of event that enhances credibility
inappropriate use of the topic/event. Writing or class materials and of writing. Writing
sources. In the case of an only barely addresses places information within includes skillfully
event paper, it is unclear details of event or class a larger context. represented details about
that the event was materials. event or class materials.
attended.
D/F C B A
REFLECTION/RESPONSE
Ineffective Partially-effective Effective Exceptional
Fails to explore new ideas Begins exploration of Explores ideas unfamiliar Exhibits a significant
and/or works without new ideas but could push to the reader, and investigation of new ideas
making any connection further. Experience of questions different by way of exploring an
between event or class event or class materials is thinking. Puts experience event or class materials.
materials and a personal put in a personal context of event or class materials Shows signs of personal
context. but lacks development of in a personal context, is growth and/or
ideas. well-developed, and considerable
includes self-evaluation. self-evaluation.
D/F C B A