0% found this document useful (0 votes)
35 views

Document 13

This article discusses using a laboratory scale bio-tower system to treat municipal wastewater. It achieved 70-87% reduction in chemical oxygen demand, 94-96% reduction of ammonia nitrogen, and 69-87% reduction of total phosphorus. The system used a polypropylene growth media and was able to effectively remove organic matter and nitrify wastewater.

Uploaded by

Kaira Patel 653
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
35 views

Document 13

This article discusses using a laboratory scale bio-tower system to treat municipal wastewater. It achieved 70-87% reduction in chemical oxygen demand, 94-96% reduction of ammonia nitrogen, and 69-87% reduction of total phosphorus. The system used a polypropylene growth media and was able to effectively remove organic matter and nitrify wastewater.

Uploaded by

Kaira Patel 653
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 8

See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.

net/publication/339950080

Bio-tower Application for Wastewater Treatment

Article in Journal of Engineering Research and Reports · March 2020


DOI: 10.9734/jerr/2020/v11i117048

CITATIONS READS
7 2,199

3 authors, including:

Klaus Doelle
State University of New York College of Environmental Science and Forestry
154 PUBLICATIONS 456 CITATIONS

SEE PROFILE

All content following this page was uploaded by Klaus Doelle on 07 June 2021.

The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.


Journal of Engineering Research and Reports

11(1): 1-7, 2020; Article no.JERR.54868


ISSN: 2582-2926

Bio-tower Application for Wastewater Treatment


Klaus Doelle1*, Yue Qin1 and Qian Wang1
1
Department of Paper and Bioprocess Engineering (PBE), College of Environmental Science and
Forestry (ESF), State University of New York (SUNY), One Forestry Drive, Syracuse,
NY 13210, USA.

Authors’ contributions

This work was carried out in collaboration among all authors. Authors YQ and QW wrote the first draft
of the manuscript. Author KD wrote the final draft and approved the final manuscript.

Article Information

DOI: 10.9734/JERR/2020/v11i117048
Editor(s):
(1) Dr. Heba Abdallah Mohamed Abdallah, National Research Centre, Egypt.
(2) Dr. Ahmed Bdour, The Hashemite University, Jordan.
Reviewers:
(1) Cristina Hegedüs, University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine Cluj-Napoca, România.
(2) Ivona Nuić, University of Split, Croatia.
Complete Peer review History: http://www.sdiarticle4.com/review-history/54868

Received 26 December 2019


Accepted 01 March 2020
Original Research Article
Published 11 March 2020
Article

ABSTRACT
The study tested the performance of a batch-type recirculating laboratory scale bio-tower for the
treatment of municipal wastewater. Performance tests were done with a HACH DR-1900
spectrophotometer include chemical oxygen demand, total phosphorus and nitrogen ammonia.
3 3
This study showed that the recirculated laboratory type bio-tower containing 0.276 ft (0.008 m ) of
polypropylene growth media with a surface area of 6.624 ft2 (0.615 m2) can reduce the chemical
oxygen demand between 70% to 87%. NH3-N reduction was found to be between 94% to 96%,
and total phosphorus reduction was between 69% and 87% for flow rates of 0.6 l/min to 1.5 l/min.

Keywords: Bio-tower; wastewater treatment; chemical oxygen demand; total phosphorous; ammonia
nitrogen.

1. INTRODUCTION residential, commercial and industrial use


accelerate the depletion of the water resources.
The most significant challenge facing our world in Reuse of the effluent water before and after
the future pertains to clean water. The constantly treatment can become an effective solution to the
increasing needs for water resources for shortage of the water resources. Currently golf
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________

*Corresponding author: Email: kdoelle@esf.edu;


Doelle et al.; JERR, 11(1): 1-7, 2020; Article no.JERR.54868

courses require on average of 48.2-acre-feet to nitrification trickling filters. Choosing the right
386.2 acre-feet (15,706,000 to 125,844,000 BOD-loading is of primary importance to achieve
gal/year) of water for irrigation purpose annually proper nitrification, whereas a low BOD-loading
[1]. Today mostly fresh water or well water generally means good nitrification. The United
resources is used for irrigation purposes. This States Environmental Protection Agency
irrigation water might come in the future from (USEPA) has recommended organic loading
resources such as: Storm runoff from impervious rates per unit volume for different filter media and
surfaces captured in retention ponds, high flow Richards and Parker [12] have published
(flood) water diversion into storage ponds, comparable data on a surface area basis
secondary or tertiary effluent from a Waste Water [9,10,11].
Treatment Plant (WWTP), grey water, and
treated or raw water from a local public water According to the USEPA, temperature highly
supply distribution systems [2]. influences the nitrification and must be set in a
range between 4 and 45 degree Celsius
A bio-tower or sometimes known as trickling filter temperature. Even though there is no consistent
is one of the two main types of biological control data that quantifies the effect of different
units [3]. Industrial and municipal WWTP use bio- temperatures on nitrification, satisfactory
towers as part of the secondary treatment nitrification occurs in the range from 15 to 25°C.
process [4,5]. A bio-tower is a round tank The pH-value of the wastewater should range
structure and contain usually engineered growth from 6.5 to 8.0 to ensure process stability [9].
media with a high surface area [6]. Rock, slag The rate of dissolved oxygen usually does not
and wood was a common growth media in the limit combined nitrification and carbon oxidation
past but provide lower surface area and void processes with natural air draught, as they are
volume, limiting the hydraulic flow rate of the bio- typically operate with low organic loading rates.
tower and therefore require larger more costly Recirculation of the effluent and therefore
systems for WWTP. Today, materials such as increasing hydraulic loading can improve
Polyvinyl Chloride (PVC), Polypropylene (PP) nitrification rates above 50% for moderate or high
with a defined specific surface area between 90 temperatures. Recirculation has also a quite
to 226 m2/m3 are utilized [7,8]. pronounced effect on removal of organic matter
for deep bio filters, as in a bio-tower [12,13,14]. A
In bio-towers, a distribution system equally
recent study shows that a bio-tower can remove
spreads the wastewater (WW) over a biofilm
volatile organic compounds, which would harm
covered growth media. The wastewater then
humans and the environment [15].
trickles over the medium and is collected at the
bottom of the bio-tower. The growth media is The following study explores if the combined
located above the bottom of the bio-tower to nitrification and organic matter removal from
ensure air transfer throughout the filter media. A Municipal Waste Water (MWW) using a
pump lifts the inflowing wastewater to the Laboratory Benchtop Bioreactor System (LBBS).
distributor as well as partially recirculates the
effluent [9]. 2. MATERIAL AND TESTING
Even though, bio-towers traditionally remove
organic matter by heterotrophic bacteria, this 2.1 Laboratory Benchtop Bioreactor
process can be successfully combined with a System
nitrification process. Nitrification is the sequential
reaction from ammonium over nitrite to nitrate, A Laboratory Benchtop Bioreactor System
carried out by the autotrophic nitrosomonas and (LBBS) was designed and installed according to
nitrobacter bacteria [10]. In the upper portion of Fig. 1. The LBBS consisted of a 15 l WW
the bio-tower, the heterotrophic bacteria outgrow reservoir, made from a 5 gal (18.92 l) pail (a).
the nitrifying species. As soon as the organic The wastewater is pumped from the reservoir
matter in the WW is subsequently decreased with small 25-Watt pond pump (b). The pond
below a threshold concentration of approximately pump has a maximal flow rate of 4.40 gal/min
20 mg/l soluble BOD5 (biochemical oxygen (16.66 l/min) at a head of 5.5 ft. (1.67 m) at a rate
demand), the nitrifying bacteria can compete and of 0.5 l/min trough a Polyvinyl Chloride (PVC)
initiate nitrification [9,11]. hose with a 10 mm inside diameter (c) to the
distributer (e) build from a small 0.5 liter PVC
Past studies provide good empirical data for container. The distributor had 50 holes with 2
setting up combined carbon oxidation and mm in diameter equally spaced on the bottom.

2
Doelle et al.; JERR, 11(1): 1-7, 2020;; Article no.JERR.54868
no.

The flow is regulated with a hose clamp valve (d). den pumped with pump (b) at a rate of 0.5 l/min
The distributer trickled the influent onto trough pipe (c) to the distributer (e). The flow
Polypropylene (PP) bacteria growth media (g), regulation occurred with valve (d). The distributer
3 3
which was cut randomly from 0.276 ft (0.008 m ) (e) trickled the CM-suspension
suspension onto the growth
recycled Bentwood CF-1900 1900 cross flow media media (g) were bacteria contained in the cow
with 48 ft2/ft3 157 m2/m3 [8] to a maximum size of manure started to grow removing the
1.0 x 1.0 x 1.0 in (25 x 25 x 25 mm). The cut contaminants contained in the CM CM-suspension.
media is installed in two equal 250 mm long After the CM-suspension
suspension made its way through
segments with a diameter of 90 mm into the the growth media (g) it runs back with pipe (h)
glass tank with 900 mm in height and 90 mm in into the reservoir (b). Airflow at 0.14
.14 gal/min (0.5
diameter (f) separated by 40 mm with a distance l/min) is supplied with a fish tank air pump (i) into
3
holder.
older. Each installed segment from 0.138 ft the bottom of the LBBS using a fish tank air
3
(0.004 m ) cut crossflow media has a surface stone (j).
2 2
area of 6.624 ft (0.615 m ).
The LBBS continued to operate in this way for 3
weeks. The evaporated portion of the CM CM-
suspension in the reservoir is replaced daily with
diluted new CM suspension, until the growth
media contains a cover of brown bacteria. After
the 3-week
week inoculation phase, the reservoir is
emptied and cleaned. The initial testing starts
with 10 liters of WW as described in the following
sections 2.2 and 2.3.

2.2 Testing Regime and Sample


Collection

10 l of wastewater was collected directly form the


influent stream of primary clarifier and filled into
the reservoir of the LBBS prior to each test run.
During each test run a 30 ml WW sample were
collected directly from the reservoir of the LBBS
at the beginning of the test (0--hour), after 4
hours, 8 hours and 24 hours. Flow rates applied
to the bio-tower
tower system were 0.6 l/min, 0.8 l/min,
1 l/min and 1.5 l/min. Based on the above flow
rates the daily (24h) hydraulic loading is 0.7
3 2 3 2 3 2
m /m d, 0.94 m /m d, 1.18 m /m d, and 1.76
Fig. 1. Laboratory Biotower; a) Reservoir, b) m3/m2d respectively.
Pump, c) Feed pipe,, d) Valve, e) Distributor f)
Reactor vessel, g) Growth media,
media h) Return After each test, the treated wastewater in the
pipe, i) Air pump, j) Air stone reservoir is discharged and replaced with new 10
l of pre-clarified
clarified wastewater. Samples were
After the suspension made its way through the stored in a refrigerator at 4°C between collection
growth media (g), the suspension is collected in and analyzation.
the lower part of the glass tank and transferred
back to the reservoir (b) with a 10 mm diameter 2.3 Testing and Recording
PVC hose (h).
To verify the exact concentration of Chemical
The LBBS operation ability is tested with tap Oxygen Demand (COD), Total Phosphorous (TP)
water before the start up was initiated.
initiate and Ammonia Nitrogen (NH3-N) N) a HACH DR900
Spectrophotometer and a HACH DRB200
For starting up the LBBS, Cow Manure (CM) with Reactor is used for analyzation. The analyzation
12% solids content was obtained from the of the collected 30 ml samples followed HACH
SUNY-Morrisville
Morrisville Farm. The CM was diluted 100 Method 8000 [16] 6] for COD using HACH COD
times with tap water. 10 liter of the diluted CM- TNTplus Vial Test (3-50.0mg/L),
50.0mg/L), HACH Meth
Method
suspension is then put into the reservoir (a) and 10127 [17] for TP using HACH-TNT
TNT Reagent Set

3
Doelle et al.; JERR, 11(1): 1-7, 2020;; Article no.JERR.54868
no.

(1-100.0mg/L),
100.0mg/L), and HACH Method 10031 [18] for rate 0.6 l/min, COD concentration dropped from
NH3-N using HACH-TNTTNT Reagent Set (0.4-50.0
(0.4 55.0 to 7.0 mg/l, TP dropped from 1.6 to 0.3 mg/
mg/l
mg/L). and NH3-N N dropped from 9.2 to 0.4 mg/l. At a
flow rate 0.8 L/min, COD concentration dropped
3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION from 130.0 to 32.0 mg/l, TP dropped from 5.4 to
0.5 mg/l, and NH3-N N dropped from 12.5 to 8.0
Figs. 2 to 5 shows that under
nder different flow rates mg/l and NH3-N N dropped from 7.6 to 0.3 mg/l. At
in the LBBS, Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD), a flow rate 1.5 L/min the COD concentration
Total Phosphorus (TP) and Nitrogen ammonia dropped from 57.0 to 11.0 mg/l, TP dropped from
(NH3-N) concentration decreased dramatically at 3.7 to 0.6 mg/l and NH3-N N dropped from 11.5 to
first 8-10 hours independent from the WW values 0.6 mg/l. After
fter 8 hours, the concentration of
of each test at the 0-hour. Values of the WW COD, TP and NH3-N kept at a very low level. In
shown at the 0-hour
hour are different values due to this case, the bioreactor significantly reduc
reduced
the daily fluctuation of the incoming WW at the COD, TP and NH3-N content in wastewater at
WWTP at the day of collection [5,19]. At a flow different flow rates.

Fig. 2. COD, TP and NH3-N at 0.6 l/min flow rate

Fig. 3. COD, TP and NH3-N at 0.8 l/min flow rate

4
Doelle et al.; JERR, 11(1): 1-7, 2020;; Article no.JERR.54868
no.

Fig. 4. COD, TP and NH3-N at 1.0 l/min flow rate

Fig. 5. COD, TP and NH3-N at 1.5 l/min flow rate

Table 1. COD, TP and NH3-N reduction at different flow rate

Flow rate COD reduction N reduction P reduction


(l/min) percentage percentage percentage
0.6 87% 96% 81%
0.8 78% 94% 87%
1.0 70% 96% 69%
1.5 81% 95% 84%

Also, as the flow rate increased, the COD insufficient oxygen supply in the tower might
percentage reduction decreased as shown in have an effect on the microorganisms, inhibiting
Table 1. This can be explained by a shorter an effectively degradation of COD. NH3-N
residence time of the wastewater in the reservoir reduction was found to be between 94% and
and bioreactor giving the microorganisms not 96%, whereas TP reduction was between 69%
enough time to degrade the COD. Also, and 87%. Overall, depending on the daily WW

5
Doelle et al.; JERR, 11(1): 1-7, 2020; Article no.JERR.54868

supply the LBBS was able to achieve effluent wastewater treatment systems. Chemical
permit levels of TP of 0.8 mg/l, NH3-N of 0.5 mg/l, Engineering Journal. 2005;113(2-3):93-
and COD <4 mg/l. 104.
4. Gerba CP, Pepper IL. Environmental and
4. CONCLUSION rd
Pollution Science. 3 ed. Academic Press;
2019.
In this study shows that a bench type laboratory 5. Doelle K, Watkins C. Algae to remove
bio-tower containing 0.276 ft3 (0.008 m3) PP phosphorous in a trickling filter. British
bacteria growth media, can reduce 70%-80% Journal of Advances in Biology &
COD, over 90% TP and over 80% of NH3-N in 8 Biotechnology (BJABB). 2017;11(2):1-9.
hours.
6. The University of Nottingham. Environ-
mental Technology Centre-Biotowers.
The bio-tower was operated with sampled WW
from WWTP. Operational flow rates were 0.6 [Accessed 20 January 2020]
l/min, 0.8 l/min, 1.0 l/min and 1.5 l/min and a Available:https://www.nottingham.ac.uk/etc
3 2
daily (24 h) hydraulic loading of 0.7 m /m d, /sol_b_biotowers.php
0.94 m /m d, 1.18 m /m d and 1.76 m /m2d
3 2 3 2 3
7. Tchobanoglous G, Burton FL, Stensel H.
respectively. Wastewater engineering treatment and
th
reuse. 4 Edition: Metcalf & Eddy Inc.;
Future study should be focus on higher flow 2003.
rates and upscale of the bio-tower operation that 8. Cross Flow Media. Brentwood Industries,
would generate enough water usable for Inc.: Datasheet BT006-1_09-14_EN.
irrigation purposes based on local and state
regulations. 9. Daigger GT, Boltz JP. Trickling filter and
trickling filter-suspended growth process
design and operation: A state-of-the-art
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS review. Water Environment Research.
2011;83(5):388-404.
The authors are grateful for the support provided
TRINITY Institute at SUNY-ESF, The Village of 10. United States Environmental Protection
Minoa and the US Golf Association for providing Agency. Wastewater technology fact sheet
part of the funding for the project. trickling filter nitrification. EPA 832-F-00-
015; 2000
COMPETING INTERESTS 11. Glen TD, Joshua PB. Trickling filter and
trickling filter‐suspended growth process
Authors have declared that no competing design and operation: A state‐of‐the‐art
interests exist. review. Water Environmental Research.
2011;83(5):388-404.
REFERENCES 12. Parker DS, Richards T. Nitrification in
trickling filters. Water Pollution Control
1. Throssell CS, Lyman GT, Johnson ME, Federation. 1986;58(9):896-902.
Stacey GA, Brown CD. Golf course 13. Hanumanulu V. Effect of recirculation on
environmental profile measures water use, deep trickling filter performance. Water
source, cost, quality, and management Pollution Control Federation. 1969:41(10):
and conservation strategies. 2009;6(1):1- 1803-1806.
16.
14. Gullicks HA, Cleasby JL. Nitrification
[Accessed 20 January 2020] performance of a pilot-scale trickling
Available:https://buckeyeturf.osu.edu/pdf/p filter. Research Journal of the Water
rofile.pdf Pollution Control Federation. 1990;62(1):
2. McCarthy C. Best management practices 40-49.
for golf course water use. Connecticut 15. Odd-lvar L. Efficiency of nitrification in
Department of Environmental Conservation; trickling filters using different filter media.
2006. Aqua Cultural Engineering. 2000;21(3):
3. Chris E, Chirs Q, Peter B, Jay W, Dirk A. 181-199.
Odor and air emissions control using 16. HACH Method 8000: Oxygen Demand,
biotechnology for both collection and Chemical.

6
Doelle et al.; JERR, 11(1): 1-7, 2020; Article no.JERR.54868

Available:https://www.hach.com/dr1900- Available:https://www.hach.com/dr1900-
portable-spectrophotometer/product- portable-spectrophotometer/product-
parameter-reagent?id=18915675456 parameter-reagent?id=18915675456
17. HACH Method 10127: Phosphorus, Total. 19. Doelle K. Water treatment and remediation
Available:https://www.hach.com/dr1900- using a bioreactor. Unites States Golf
portable-spectrophotometer/product- Association (USGA), Turfgrass and
parameter-reagent?id=18915675456 Environmental Research. 2015;14(1):12-
18. HACH Method 10031: Nitrogen Ammonia. 14.

© 2020 Doelle et al.; This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License
(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium,
provided the original work is properly cited.

Peer-review history:
The peer review history for this paper can be accessed here:
http://www.sdiarticle4.com/review-history/54868

View publication stats

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy