Cawaling vs. COMELEC
Cawaling vs. COMELEC
Cawaling vs. COMELEC
COMELEC
GR Nos. 146319 and 146342 dated August 10, 1992
FACTS:
Former Pres. Estrada signed into law RA No. 8806 “An Act Creating the City of Sorsogon by
Merging The Municipalities of Bacon and Sorsogon in the Province of Sorsogon, and
Appropriating Funds Therefor”
Pursuant to Art. X of the Constitution, a plebiscite was conducted. PCGC proclaimed the creation
of City of Sorsogon.
Invoking his right as a resident and taxpayer, Cawaling filed a petition for certiorari seeking
annulment of plebiscite based on the following grounds: (1) the plebiscite was conducted
beyond the required 120-day period from the approval of RA 8806 in violation of Sec. 54 therof;
and (2) respondent COMELEC failed to observe the legal requirement of 20 days extensive
information campaign.
He also contended that a component city may be created only by converting “a municipality or a
cluster of barangays”, not by merging two municipalities as what RA No. 8806 has done.
Hence, the present petition
ISSUE/S:
W/N
HELD:
Every statute has in its favor the presumption of constitutionality. The presumption is rooted in the
doctrine of separation of powers which enjoins upon the three coordinate department of the
Government a becoming courtesy for each other’s act. The theory is that every law, being the joint act of
the Legislature and the Executive, has passed careful scrutiny to ensure that it is in accord with the
fundamental law.