ISO 27k - Standards - Listing - 2022
ISO 27k - Standards - Listing - 2022
ISO 27k - Standards - Listing - 2022
45 -4 DRAFT — Coordination
— Guidelines for
48 -3 2013
ICT supply chain security
Big data security and privacy - Will cover processes for security and privacy of big
57 ISO/IEC 27045 DRAFT
Processes data (whatever that turns out to mean)
IoT security and privacy – Guidelines Advice on identifying and treating information risks
74 ISO/IEC 27403 DRAFT
for IoT-domotics for IoT in the home
IoT security and privacy – Cybersecurity How to label IoT things to indicate their security
75 ISO/IEC 27404 DRAFT
labelling for consumer IoT security and privacy status
Impact of security and privacy in Guidance on assessing security and privacy aspects
88 ISO/IEC TR 27563 DRAFT
artificial intelligence use cases of AI use cases in ISO/IEC TR 24030
Search
Search this site
Abstract
“ISO/IEC 27031:2011 describes the concepts and principles of information and comunication
technology (ICT) readiness for business continuity, and provides a framework of methods and
processes to identify and specify all aspects (such as performance criteria, design, and
implementation) for improving an organisation's ICT readiness to ensure business continuity ...”
Introduction
ISO/IEC 27031 provides guidance on the concepts and principles behind the role of Information and
https://www.iso27001security.com/html/27031.html (1 of 5)2/2/2024 6:41:31 PM
ISO/IEC 27031 ICT for business continuity
● Suggests a structure or framework (a coherent set or suite of methods and processes) for any
organisation – private, governmental, and non-governmental;
● Identifies and specifies all relevant aspects including performance criteria, design, and implementation
details, for improving ICT readiness as part of the organisation’s ISMS, helping to ensure business
continuity;
● Enables an organisation to measure its ICT continuity, security and hence readiness to survive a disaster
in a consistent and recognized manner.
● ICT is prevalent and many organisations are highly dependent on ICT supporting critical business
processes;
● ICT also supports incident, business continuity, disaster and emergency response, and related
management processes;
● Business continuity planning is incomplete without adequately considering and protecting ICT availability
and continuity.
● Preparing the organisation’s ICT (i.e. the IT infrastructure, operations and applications), plus the
associated processes and people, against unforeseeable events that could change the risk environment
and impact ICT and business continuity;
● Leveraging and streamlining resources among business continuity, disaster recovery, emergency response
and ICT security incident response and management activities.
ICT readiness should of course reduce the impact (meaning the extent, duration and/or consequences) of
information security incidents on the organisation.
The standard incorporates the cyclical Plan-Do-Check-Act Deming-style approach, extending the conventional
business continuity planning process to take greater account of ICT. It incorporates ‘failure scenario assessment
https://www.iso27001security.com/html/27031.html (2 of 5)2/2/2024 6:41:31 PM
ISO/IEC 27031 ICT for business continuity
methods’ such as Failure Modes and Effects Analysis, with a focus on identifying ‘triggering events’ that could
precipitate more or less serious incidents.
The SC 27 team responsible for ISO/IEC 27031 liaised with ISO Technical Committee 233 on business
continuity, to ensure alignment and avoid overlap or conflict.
Personal comments
The value of this standard is unclear, given that ISO 22301 does such a good job in this general area while ISO/
IEC 24762 covers ICT Disaster Recovery specifically.
If it is to remain a part of ISO27k, I personally feel it at least ought to be properly aligned with the current
2019 version of ISO 22301, and ideally extended beyond the ICT domain since ISO27k is about information risk
and security, not just “ICT” (a clumsy and unnecessary amplification of good old “IT” which in common usage
has included comms for, oh at least 50 years). However, the present scope is specific to ICT:
“The scope of this document is clearly delimited on information and communication technology (ICT)
readiness for business continuity. Readiness of ICT for business continuity means that ICT and its
operational capabilities demonstrate the ability to achieve desired business continuity objectives in
case of a disruption affecting ICT.”
Furthermore, to avoid any hint of overlap/conflict with the ISO 22300 standards, the revised ToR clearly states
that ’27031 will not replace a Business Continuity Management System. That said, the draft 2nd edition orbits
around “IRBC” (ICT Readiness for Business Continuity) ... which is essentially a systematic way to manage the
IT elements of business continuity, supplementing the BCMS as a whole.
Although the issued standard mentions resilience to as well as recovery from disastrous situations, the coverage
on resilience is quite light, perhaps because of the curious definition in the first edition: “Resilience: ability to
transform, renew, and recover, in timely response to events”. That’s just odd! Resilience in the information risk
and security context is about the organisation’s information processes, systems and networks bending rather
than breaking when under intense pressure. It’s about toughness and determination, keeping the essential
core business activities going despite adversity. It involves taking an engineering approach, deliberately and
competently designing things for stability, reliability/dependability and continuity. Common examples for high-
availability IT systems are load balancing between redundant servers and comms links, and automated failover.
Sound engineering concepts such as more-than-merely-adequate capacity, redundancy, robustness and
flexibility ensure that vital business operations are not materially degraded or halted by most incidents.
Preventive maintenance and proactive monitoring, extra-cautious change management and slick high-priority
incident responses are further controls that help maintain critical services.
https://www.iso27001security.com/html/27031.html (3 of 5)2/2/2024 6:41:31 PM
ISO/IEC 27031 ICT for business continuity
Meanwhile, however, the twelve year old standard’s conspicuous disregard for cloud computing is a clear
indication of its seriously outdated approach. Cloud is core to ICT for many organisations today, offering
performance, scaleability and flexibility that can significantly increase resilience, if properly engineered.
Unfortunately, the draft revised standard does not cover that either. The word ‘cloud’ appears just three times
in the 1st CD, noting that there are business continuity risks with cloud services. Its value as a business
continuity control isn’t covered.
Along similar lines, supply chain/network resilience is also conspicuously absent. The widespread coordination
and tight integration of companies in many industries thanks to the Internet has huge implications on business
continuity, but the draft revised standard offers little if any useful guidance in this critically important area.
Likewise again, Working From Home and Bring Your Own Device are significant parts of the global response to
COVID-19, yet they are not even mentioned - a classic example of the difficulties keeping up with the ever-
changing state of the art, given the inevitably slow pace of global standards work.
‘True contingency thinking’ involves the organisation’s flexibility, capability, resources and dogged
determination to cope with whatever situations actually eventuate, preparing for the uncertainties and
challenges ahead. The draft revised standard only refers once to ‘contingency’, as a garbled note to a definition
of “ICT readiness”.
In order to incorporate the cloud and supply chain aspects, broaden the brief beyond ICT and substantially
improve its coverage of resilience and contingency, I feel the standard should be substantially restructured and
rewritten. Maybe at the next revision? Meanwhile, ISO 22301 is a much more valuable resource IMNSHO.