Research-Paper Grade-12 Stem Group C-1-1
Research-Paper Grade-12 Stem Group C-1-1
Research-Paper Grade-12 Stem Group C-1-1
Cabilin, Karylle G.
Labisig, Frienzal S.
May 2024
2
Plagiarism Disclaimer
We were duly informed about plagiarism by my research teacher and the school. We
understand that plagiarism is presenting someone else work or ideas as my own, with or
without their consent, by incorporating it into my work without full acknowledgement and
citation.
We acknowledge and understand that plagiarism is serious academic dishonesty and offense.
Any plagiarism offense found in this paper is our sole doing and my own responsibility. The
research teacher and the school should not be held liable.The school may take disciplinary
action against me if there is a belief that this is not my own in my writing.
Lastly, I have not allowed, nor will I in the future allow anyone to copy my work with the
intention of passing it off as their own work.
_________________________
Signature over printed name
________________________
Date signed
3
Approval Sheet
This researched entitled, “Artificial Intelligence: The Impact of Using AI Tools on Grade
prepared and submitted by Frienzal S. Labisig, Kent Francis B. Naong, Mary Kyle D. Tagbac,
Karylle G. Cabilin, April Ruth C. Bulay, and John August R. Elopre ,as a FINAL
the requirements for Senior High school has been examined and is recommended for FINAL
Research Teacher
Accepted and approved in partial fulfillment of the requirements for Senior High School.
Date of Submission:
ALEJANDRO M. LAPUT
ABSTRACT
Artificial Intelligence (AI) stands as one of the most transformative technological advancements
of the 21st century, revolutionizing various aspects of human life, including education. With its
ability to mimic cognitive functions such as learning and problem-solving. In the context of
Grade 11 students at Rizal Memorial Institute of Dapitan City Inc., the integration of AI tools
into their academic environment marks a significant shift in pedagogical practices, warranting a
comprehensive investigation into its implications on their academic performance. The study
aimed to determine whether AI tool usage had primarily positive, negative, or mixed outcomes.
Out of 128 grade 11 students in RMIDCI, the researchers gathered only 97 respondents, 19
respondents from ABM strand which 15 are female and 4 are male,30 respondents from HUMSS
strand which 15 are male and also 15 are female, and 48 respondents from STEM strand which
consist of 24 male and 24 female. The researchers gathered data by using survey questionnaires
that detailed the possible impacts of using AI tools. In table 14 , the results showed that majority
of the respondents 86% are having positive experience when using AI tools for academic
performances and 14% negative. The AI tools were a huge help in helping them get better grades
because they made answering questions easier. However, there are drawbacks as well. Students
may become too dependent on AI tools, too lazy to answer questions using their critical thinking,
and also decreases the level of their knowledge. The findings of this study may encourage
students to use AI tools in appropriate ways to avoid relying too much on artificial intelligence
resources.
5
6
TABLE OF CONTENT
TITLE PAGE............................................................................................................................1
PLAGIARISM DISCLAIMER...............................................................................................2
APPROVAL SHEET...............................................................................................................3
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT ......................................................................................................4
ABSTRACT..............................................................................................................................5
CHAPTER PAGE
7
CHAPTER 1
Introduction
advancements of the 21st century, revolutionizing various aspects of human life, including
education. With its ability to mimic cognitive functions such as learning and problem-solving, AI
has found its way into educational settings, promising to enhance teaching methodologies and
improve learning outcomes. In the context of Grade 11 students at Rizal Memorial Institute of
Dapitan City Inc., the integration of AI tools into their academic environment marks a significant
universities, due to the limitations of traditional teaching methods and the complexity of the
educational system. E-learning has made a wealth of data accessible, allowing AI to find smart
solutions to complex education problems. “Studies show that AI is crucial in higher education,
particularly in universities, as it provides flexible learning opportunities for students through the
use of innovative technologies. Artificial intelligence tools in education such as ChatGPT, Scikit
Learn, TensorFlow, PyTorch, CNTK, Caffe, Apache MXNet, Keras, OpenNN,AutoML, H2O,
OpenAI, Grammarly, and Quillbox are making teaching and learning easier and more efficient.”
This research endeavors to delve into the nuanced impacts of AI tools on the academic
performance of Grade 11 students at Rizal Memorial Institute of Dapitan City Inc. The study
aims to discern whether the utilization of AI tools yields predominantly positive or negative
8
efficiency, engagement levels, and comprehension retention, the research seeks to provide
insights into how AI interventions shape the educational experiences and achievements of the
policymakers can gain a deeper understanding of the role AI plays in contemporary education
Theoretical Framework
The study's theoretical framework is grounded in the ideas of Clark's (2011) discussion of
Technology-Mediated Learning (TML) Theory. Using this framework, the study at Rizal
Memorial Institute of Dapitan City Inc. intends to investigate the detrimental effects of artificial
intelligence (AI) on academic performance among Grade 11 students. With this method, the
strategies, and learning outcomes. By using this lens, the study aims to shed light on the unique
difficulties that artificial intelligence presents for providing guidance for efficient interventions
Conceptual Framework
In the formulation of the framework of this study, the researchers adopted the ideas of
Juinaid Tahir (June 29, 2023) and People’s Alliance for Continuing Education (n.d).
Dependence on Technology
9
technology. Relying too heavily on Artificial Intelligence tools and platforms may hinder the
development of crucial cognitive, problem-solving, and life skills that can only be nurtured
Inequitable Access
Although Artificial Intelligence has the potential to democratize education by making it more
accessible, there is a risk of creating a digital divide. Students from disadvantaged backgrounds
or regions with limited access to technology may face barriers in benefiting from Artificial
Artificial Intelligence can personalize learning experiences to some extent, but it cannot fully
replace the human touch. Students need emotional support, motivation, and guidance, which
educators are better equipped to provide. Relying too much on Artificial Intelligence could
weaken the personal connection between teachers and students, potentially impacting student
Personalized Learning
One major area of impact is personalized learning. Artificial Intelligence powered systems have
the capability to adapt to individual student needs and provide tailored content. This ensures that
each learner receives a customized educational experience, allowing them to progress at their
own pace. For example, intelligent tutoring systems can identify a student’s strengths and
Figure 1 shows the input, process, and output of this study. As for the input, researchers
collect data about students' characteristics like age, gender, and academic track, which helps to
understand who the students are. Additionally, the researchers inquire about the specific types or
brands of artificial intelligence tools that students commonly use to gain insights into the
technological resources influencing their academic performance. Moreover, they explore how
using AI tools, such as ChatGPT, Quilbot, and etc., affects students' critical thinking, solving
problem, and learning abilities. By asking questions about the impact of AI tools on academic
performance, researchers aim to investigate if AI tools really affect the academic performance of
The process encompasses a series of steps to gather, analyze, and understand data about
how AI tools influence students' academic performance. First, researchers send a letter
11
explaining the study and how students can take part. Then, they hand out questionnaires to
students to learn about their experiences with AI tools and how it affects their academic
performance. After collecting the questionnaires, researchers analyze the data to see the impact
of using AI tools on students’ academic performance. This helps them understand how
The output of the study shows how using AI tools can affect students' academic
performance. Based on their analysis, researchers provide suggestions on how to use Ai tools in
better way. These suggestions can help teachers and policymakers make decisions on how to use
AI tools effectively, even with the use of technology. By offering practical advice, the study aims
to help students to know what are the impacts of using AI tools in their academic performances.
academic performance of the grade 11 students at Rizal Memorial Institute of Dapitan City,
Inc. (RMIDCI). The study will explore how the use of artificial intelligence (AI) tools, such as
ChatGPT, Quilbot and etc., may affect every student's academic performances. The
researchers observed that instead of using their own knowledge and critical thinking, students
rely and depend on AI technologies to provide answers to their assignments, math problems,
1.1 Strand
1.2 Sex
12
1.3 Age
2. What is the impact of using AI tools on the academic performance of the Grade 11
Hypothesis
H₁. There is a positive impact of using AI tools on the academic performance of the Grade 11
H₀. There is a negative impact of using AI tools on the academic performance of the Grade 11
This research aims to examine the factors influencing Grade 11 students' academic
performance at Rizal Memorial Institute of Dapitan City Inc., The study will explore how the use
of artificial intelligence (AI) tools, such as ChatGPT, Quilbot, etc., may affect every student's
academic performance. However, it will not delve into specific types of gadgets, teacher profiles,
or detailed usage patterns. By exploring the perception of learners, this research aims to provide
insights into how AI tools affect academic performance and provide recommendations on how to
The data collection will be conducted with the total of 97 selected students from grade 11
in Rizal Memorial Institute of Dapitan City Inc. (RMIDCI), who will represent the population
regardless of their demographic profile. The others students, who do not fall under the category
of grade 11 students, are not within the scope of this research. The result of this study will be
applicable to all students in RMIDCI who are using on AI tools in their academic. The study
13
would be done through the utilization of a questionnaire given to the students as a survey and
Students
In this study, the students will be able to know the impacts of using Artificial Intelligence
(AI) tools in their academic performance and will be encourage to use it effectively.
Teacher
So, the teachers understand the impact of AI tools on students' academic performance can
help teachers adapt their teaching methods to integrate AI effectively into the classroom.
Parents
Parents will gain insights into how AI tools influence their children's academic
performance, allowing them to make informed decisions regarding their children's education.
School
Insights from the study can guide professional development programs for teachers,
equipping them with the skills and knowledge needed to leverage AI technologies in the
classroom effectively.
Future Researchers
The future researchers can gain some data from this study. It can serve as their basis for
further study about the impact of using Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools in academic
performance.
14
Definition of Terms
Artificial intelligence
The term used to describe the modeling of human intelligence processes by computers,
Impacts
It refers to the meaningful or significant effect that results from a particular action,
event, or process.
Using AI Tools
The act of employing software applications or systems that leverage artificial intelligence
Students in Grade 11
These are students in their crucial year of secondary education, usually between the
Academic Performance
their grades, test scores, participation in class, completion of assignments, and overall
RMIDCI
Also known as Rizal Memorial Institute of Dapitan City Inc., a private and catholic school
Chapter II
Local
intelligence into the field of education is driving a fundamental shift in the approaches to
teaching and educational practice that are now in use. The primary purpose of this research is
intelligent tutoring systems and virtual learning environments, have on the academic
performance and comprehension of students. The findings suggest that artificial intelligence
has the potential to bring about a huge revolution in the field of education by making it
possible to personalize and adjust students' educational experiences in a way that boosts both
students' academic performance and their overall level of comprehension. In spite of this, it is
absolutely necessary to recognize the ethical repercussions that may result and the limitations
that may be imposed by the infrastructure. This highlights the importance of the responsible
incorporation of artificial intelligence. In a nutshell, the findings of this research shed light on
the considerable influence that artificial intelligence could potentially have on the field of
this with the intention of fostering equitable and improved educational experiences while
According to Peras et al. (2023), examines the relationship between BPEd student
comprehend how AI-driven educational techniques affect students' academic performance and
learning processes in this physically demanding profession. The study uses a descriptive
correlational quantitative research design to find out if there is a link between using AI and
doing well in school among first- to fourth-year BPEd students at Cebu Normal University-
Main Campus. The data is gathered using a standardized questionnaire that includes Likert-
scale items and demographic data. The study reveals that the impact of AI on academic
performance is generally perceived positively by students. The study discovered a strong and
engaging with AI are likely to achieve higher academic performance. Educators and
institutions should integrate AI technologies into teaching and learning to improve academic
interpretation, learning, and task achievement capabilities, has gained popularity in various
industries and academies due to enhanced efficiency and quality. This study aims to determine
assessment scores, course mastery, and grading metrics. It also seeks to determine if a
relationship exists between AI usage and their academic performance. The study employs a
quantitative approach using a correlational design. The respondents of the study are 293
Business Administration students from Negros Oriental State University Main Campus 1,
Dumaguete City. The study's findings suggest that AI usage among students is moderately
course mastery, and excellent grades. There is no significant relationship between AI use and
immediate feedback, and collaborative activities, but further growth and improvement are
needed, including training, accessibility, research, monitoring, and best practices sharing
artificial intelligence and its impact on student’s academic performance at the University of
Guayaquil (UG). The objective was to design and implement a predictive model to predict
developed with the factors involved in academic performance, and the criterion of expert
judgment was used to validate the questionnaire. The questionnaire and the Google Forms
platform were used for data collection. In total, 1100 copies of the questionnaire were
distributed, and 1012 responses were received, representing a response rate of 92%. The
prediction model was designed in Gretl software, and the model fit was performed considering
the mean square error (0.26), the mean absolute error (0.16), and a coefficient of
determination of 0.9075. The results show the statistical significance of age, hours, days, and
AI-based tools or applications, presenting p-values < 0.001 and positive coefficients close to
zero, demonstrating a significant and direct effect on students’ academic performance. It was
concluded that it is possible to implement a predictive model with theoretical support to adapt
mode.
Foreign
19
Mohammad and Mansour (2020) examined the effect of the teaching method using
grade students in computer science in Jordan and their attitudes towards it. To achieve the
selected sample consisting of (50) 10th-grade students at the University of Jordan School. The
study sample was randomly distributed into two groups: an experimental sample taught using
the educational software, and a control sample taught in the traditional method, where the
researcher prepared an achievement test to measure the academic achievement of the 10th-
grade students in the Computer Science Subject, where the validity and reliability of the test
has been validated, and the test-retest reliability coefficient was (0.86). A questionnaire was
prepared for the attitudes, where their validity and reliability were validated. The reliability
factor of the questionnaire based on Cronbach’s alpha equation was (0.01). To analyze the
results, an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) was used, where the results of the study showed
that there are statistically significant differences in favour of the experimental group taught
subject. The results also showed that there are medium positive attitudes of the experimental
group towards educational software. The study recommended designing and developing
computerized software in the field of teaching computer science subject s and training and
education. The study by Mohammad and Mansour (2020) is related to the present study in
Jain and Jain (2019) examined the role of artificial intelligence in higher education
using higher education institutes of Udaipur, Rajasthan. The study adopted descriptive survey
20
design. Structured questionnaires were framed and data collection is done with the help of
them taking teachers perception as the focal point. To achieve the objectives of the study
statistical tools that were applied for analyzing the collected data are frequency tables/graphs
and one-way ANNOVA. Results of the study shows that implementing AI in higher education
massive future prospects in higher education sector. Based on the findings, the study
recommended among others that higher education institutes should train and develop their
students to upgrade them to face the challenge of the AI revolution and fight successfully in
the AI age. The study by Jain and Jain (2019) is related to the present study in terms content
This study examined perceived effect of artificial intelligence tools on the academic
descriptive survey design. The population was made up of 61,888 undergraduate students in
Ojukwu University for the 2022/2023 academic session. A sample size of 300 undergraduate
students were selected from both universities using multi-stage sampling procedure. The
instrument used for data collection was a structured four-point Likert scale questionnaire titled
researchers. The instrument was validated by experts in the Faculty of Education, Nnamdi
Azikiwe University, Awka. The reliability of the instrument was established using Cronbach-
Alpha which yielded a reliability coefficient of .82. The survey data collected were analyzed
using Pearson product moment correlation (PPMC). Findings of the study revealed there was a
21
positive significant relationship of artificial intelligence (AI) tools and the learning abilities of
students in public universities in Anambra State (r = .503, N= 300, p <.05), also result reveals
that there was a positive significant relationship of artificial intelligence (AI) tools on the
300, p<.05) and there was a positive significant relationship of artificial intelligence (AI) tools
= .646**, N= 300, p<.05). The study therefore recommended among others, that university
lecturers should integrate Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools in their work, receive training, and
explore ways to use them for developing students' skills. (Ahmed et al, 2024)
Artificial intelligence (AI) and computational sciences have aroused a growing interest
in education. Despite its relatively recent history, AI is increasingly being introduced into the
classroom through different modalities, with the aim of improving student achievement. Thus,
the purpose of the research is to analyse, quantitatively and qualitatively, the impact of AI
systematic review and meta-analysis have been carried out in WOS and Scopus databases.
After applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria, the sample was set at 25 articles. The
results support the positive impact that AI and computational sciences have on student
performance, finding a rise in their attitude towards learning and their motivation, especially
in the STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics) areas. Despite the
involves a great educational and ethical challenge for teachers in relation to their design and
implementation, which requires further analysis from the educational research. These findings
Chapter 3
METHODOLOGY
Research Design
The research design chosen for this study was descriptive survey design, which aims to
systematically collect data and describe the characteristics, features, or facts about a given
population (Nworgu, 2015). This design was selected to gather data on the perceived effect of
using artificial intelligence (AI) tools on the academic performance of students in Rizal
Memorial Institute of Dapitan City. The data collected from the study population will be
recording, analysis, and interpretation of the study that focuses on prevailing phenomenon
(Joy, 2014).
Research Respondents
The researchers utilized the random sampling. The respondents of the study are the
Grade 11 students of Rizal Memorial Institute of Dapitan City, Inc. The researchers decided to
get a total of 97 respondents. The sample of this population will be selected to every section
Research Environment
23
The primary research locale for this study is the Rizal Memorial Institute of Dapitan
City, Inc. (RMIDCI), a private educational institution founded in 1946 in Dr. Heinz Luetke
Street, Potol, Dapitan City, Zamboanga del Norte. RMIDCI serves as an ideal setting for
investigating the adverse effects of using Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools on Grade 11
students' academic performance due to its accessibility to researchers and subjects, as well as
its significance in providing a conducive environment for academic inquiry. The selection of
geographical proximity, and the researchers' familiarity with the institution, which facilitates
data collection and participant identification. Specifically, the study focuses on the Senior
High School Building within RMIDCI, as these areas are where Grade 1 1 students primarily
engage in their academic activities, ensuring a targeted examination of the population relevant
Research Instrument
The primary data collection tool in this study would involve the use of a closed-ended
questionnaire. Close ended questions are defined as question types that ask respondents to
choose from a distinct set of pre-defined responses, such as “yes/no” or among set multiple
choice questions. (QuestionPro, 2023). Bonneau (2024), stated that Closed-ended questions aim
to direct the responder to answer your question in a standardized way that produces controlled
quantitative data about your target audience. Participants are encouraged to choose from a
Ethical Consideration
24
performance at Rizal Memorial Institute of Dapitan City Inc., the study prioritized the
students were asked to sign consent forms, confirming their willingness to partake in the
research. Sufficient time was allotted for respondents to complete the surveys, fostering a
sense of trust between the researcher and participants. Additionally, assurances were provided
to participants regarding the strict confidentiality of their data throughout the study.
provide a letter to the respondents for their consent before the survey questionnaire have been
distributed. The researchers conduct the research in Rizal Memorial Institute of Dapitan City,
Inc. (RMIDCI) of Grade 11 students because of the advantages of the survey procedure. The
researchers explain to the respondents the significance of their answers to the study. The
researchers clarify some terms to the respondents so that the respondents can answer the
questionnaire with full knowledge of their responsibility as the subject of the study. The
researchers requested the respondents to answer with all honesty. The researchers used a
random sampling, because in their opinion, this approach is beneficial for obtaining
quantitative responses, which improves understanding and yields more accurate research
findings. In this study since the researcher's goal is to know the impact of Using AI Tools on
Student's Academic Performance, the researcher believes that this method works best for
choosing the research sample. After the respondents answer the questionnaires, the researcher
collected and totaled the data in advance of analysis after receiving the questionnaire. Based
on the data gathered, the researcher develops suggestions and findings for this inquiry.
25
Following that, the respondents received assurances that the information would only use for
academic research.
Data Analysis
In this study there were statistical formulation that were used like frequency counting
percentage, and weighted points frequency and percentage were utilized to calculate the
emotional distress, the Binary Scale has been used. The two points corresponding to a Binary
Scale that answer Yes means agree or No is disagree. To acquire information for the study, the
researchers approach the students. In this investigation, the researchers gathered the data by
F/Nx100
26
CHAPTER IV
In this chapter, the researcher presents the interpretation of findings and analysis of
data. The following subtopics are arranged in the following subheadings: Profile of the
ABM 25 19 ** Expression is
faulty **
HUMSS 40 30 31%
B)
27
The distribution of respondents across various educational strands is shown in the table
Engineering, and Mathematics) students, who made up 48 (49%) of the sample. After STEM,
students studying HUMSS (Humanities and Social Sciences) make up a significant portion 30
(31%), while those studying ABM (Accountancy, Business, and Management) make up the
smallest portion 19 (20%). This distribution highlights the respondents emphasize STEM
education, although ABM and HUMSS also make significant contributions to the overall
diversity of academic backgrounds represented in the survey. In the table 1 provides a clear
visual representation of the distribution of educational strands among the participants and
MALE 44 45% 19
FEMALE 53 55% 30
TOTAL 97 100% 98
occupy approximately 53 (55%) of the chart, indicating a slight majority within the dataset,
28
while male respondents represent about 44 (45%), showing a slightly lesser representation. This
data suggests a relatively balanced distribution between male and female respondents, with
males having a slight edge in numbers. The pie chart effectively conveys this demographic
information at a glance.
16 47 49% 1st
17 41 42% 2nd
18 8 8% 3rd
20 1 1% 4th
TOTAL 97 0.25
The table 1 shows the profile of the respondents in terms of age. This includes four (4)
percentage of 49% and is ranked first, respondents at the age of 17 has a frequency of
frequency of 8 with a percentage of 8% and is ranked third, then last ranked are
clear in the table that the dominant age of the respondents is 16. Most of the
29
respondents from grade eleven are expected at the age of 16; the table shows that this
statement is true.
Table 4. Do you use Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools for academic purposes?
NO 0 0% 2ND
TOTAL 97 100%
The data from the Table 4 indicates that 97 (100%) of the respondents use Artificial
Intelligence (AI) tools for academic purposes. This solid usage rate highlights the pervasive role
Monthly 8 8% 5th
TOTAL 97 100%
Table 5, presents interesting information on how often the respondents use AI tools in
their academic activities. The most common category is the “Frequently” which is 28 out of 97
(29%) of the respondents use and rely on AI tools for various task. A proportion of 24 out of 97
(25%) respondents use AI tools occasionally which indicates that they use AI when specific
needs arise but don’t rely on it consistently. 21 out of 97 (22%) respondents always or consistent
use AI tools in their academic activities, this suggests that AI tools has become an integral part of
their study routines. Some of the respondents (16%) rarely use AI tools, this respondent has
limited exposure to AI technology. Lastly, only 8 out of 97 (8%) of the respondents use AI tools
on a monthly basis.
Table 6. In which subject have AI tools been most helpful? (Check all that apply)
Other 13 7% 4th
Based on the Table 6, it can be interpreted that English is the subject where AI tools
have been most helpful. The substantial majority of respondents (42%) believe that AI tools
significantly enhance scientific learning experiences. This could be attributed to AI’s ability
to provide personalized practice problems, instant feedback, and adaptive learning paths.
domains. English and Other subjects receive relatively less support from AI tools, represented
by 25% and 10%, respectively. These findings highlight the potential impact of AI on specific
subject areas and underscore the need for further exploration and integration of AI
technologies in education.
Table 7
of
Respondents
procrastination?
think critically?
tools
Legends:
Yes – Agree
No – Disagree
The table 7 above shows the impact of using AI tools in their academic performances.
This contains the responses of the respondents on whether they agree or disagree about the
using AI tools on learning environments. The majority (63%) “agree” that AI tools indeed make
learning environments more engaging. This suggests that learners appreciate the personalized
33
experiences, interactive features, and adaptability that AI brings to their educational journey.
However, a significant minority (37%) “disagree”, possibly due to concerns about overreliance
majority of respondents believe that AI tools can be beneficial for improving their grades.
With 65% of participants responding “agree”, it suggests that these individuals see potential in
AI technologies to assist them academically. This could be due to various reasons such as
study aids provided by AI systems. However, there remains a significant minority (35%) who are
“disagree” about the role of AI in academic improvement. Overall, the data highlights the need
for further exploration and understanding of how AI can best support students’ learning
outcomes. In the number 3, it can be interpreted that a significant majority (85%) of respondents
“agree” that using AI tools helpful in their academic activities. These tools are perceived as
helpful for tasks such as homework, essays, quizzes, problem-solving, and completing various
academic tasks. The relatively small minority (15%) who “disagree” that using artificial
intelligence (AI) tools doesn't help them academically. Overall, this data highlights the positive
impact of AI technology on students’ academic experiences, making learning more efficient and
effective. In number 4, majority of the respondents (35%) “agree” that using AI tools cannot lead
to procrastination and (65%) “disagree” that using AI tools can lead to procrastination. It appears
that a majority of individuals express concern about AI tools contributing to procrastination. This
could be due to factors such as overreliance on technology or the ease of access to information
that using AI tools does not enhance their ability or motivation to think critically. However, a
proportion of 40% agree that it enhance their ability or motivation to think critically, suggesting
34
that some individuals found the use of AI tools helpful to their learning. In question 6, the
majority of the respondents 86% agree that using AI tools improved their overall academic
performances and 14% disagree that it does not improved their academic performance.
CHAPTER V
RECOMMENDATIONS
This chapter presents the summary and conclusion derived in the conduct of the study
which determines the impact of using AI tools on Grade 11 students’ academic performance at
Rizal Memorial Institute of Dapitan City, Inc. The conclusion is based on the study’s
objectives, research surveys and findings. This chapter will also provide recommendations
Summary of Findings
The findings of the study were summarized according to the statement of the problem
According to the sex of the respondents, 44 respondents are males and 53 are females. For strand,
19 of the respondents are from ABM, 30 respondents are from HUMMS, and 48 respondents are
2. What is the impact of using AI tools on the academic performance of the Grade 11 students at
In conclusion, the data gathered by the researchers shows that there is a positive impact
Dapitan City, Inc. In Table 4, 97(100%) of the respondents use AI tools in their academic
performance and in Table 5, it presents information that majority of the respondents frequently
use AI tools in their academic activities, despite the number of respondents who use AI and how
often they use it, the impact still depends on how the students use AI tools in their academic
activities. In Table 6, the first positive result of the data was shown, which states that AI tools
has been very helpful to the G11 students’ different subjects, whereas English is the subject
where AI tools have been most helpful. There are a lot of data that supports on why AI tools has
a positive impact on the Grade 11 students in RMIDCI. In table 7, question number 1, majority
of the respondents 63% agree that using AI tools makes learning more engaging and 37%
disagree that using AI tools does not make learning more engaging. Number 2, majority of the
respondents 65% agree that using AI tools help them on improving their grades and 35%
disagree that it does not help them on improving their grades. Number 3, 65% of the respondents
agree that these AI tools are helpful in their academic activities such as homework, essays, and
quizzes, However, 35% disagree that using AI tools was not helpful for academic activities.
Number 4, 35% of the respondents agree that using AI tools cannot develop procrastination and
36
65% disagree that it can develop procrastination. Number 5, 40% of the respondents agree that
using AI tools enhances their ability or motivation to think critically and 60% disagree it does
not enhance their ability. Number 6, majority of the respondents 86% agree that their overall
academic performance was improve because of using AI tools and small portion of 14% disagree
Conclusion
In conclusion, the data gathered by the researchers shows that there is a positive impact
Dapitan City, Inc. The data indicates that these tools improve students' grades, especially in
English and inspire students to complete their academic activities quickly, since AI acts as their
study assistant. However, relying too much on AI tools can lead to procrastination and a
reduction in critical thinking skills in students. Still, the data collected by the researchers clearly
Recommendation
Based on the findings and conclusions presented, the following recommendations are
suggested;
Students
The researchers recommend to use AI tools to enhance your learning and build study-
related skills. AI tools have the potential to be very useful study aids. They can assist with data
processing, coming up with answers for the different queries you'll come across in your study,
and, of course, writing texts. However, users can be misled by AI tools quite easily.
Teacher
37
both teaching methods and learner performance assessments to developments in AI. When
possible, think about substituting other output types for written work. When grading student
writing, pay more attention to how students present their written work and how they monitor
Future Researchers
References
Ahmed, M., Ibrahim, A., & Aliyu, S. (2024). Perceived Effect of Artificial Intelligence Tools on
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/379311850_Perceived_Effect_Of_Artificial_Intellig
ence_Tools_On_The_Academic_Performance_Of_Students_In_Public_Universities_In_Anambr
a_State
research
38
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/378784825_The_Relationship_Between_Artif
icial_Intelligence_AI_Usage_and_Academic_Performance_of_Business_Administratio
n_Students
examples. https://dovetail.com/surveys/close-ended-questions/
Jain, S. & Jain, R. (2019). Role of artificial intelligence in higher education- an empirical
https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/e75d/b29577b390f6f093c333f9aa85be920f50d5.pdf
method-according-to
Martinez, J., Lopez, M., & Garcia, A. (2023). Impact of Artificial Intelligence and
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/367162413_Analysing_the_Impact_of_Artific
39
ial_Intelligence_and_Computational_Sciences_on_Student_Performance_Systematic_R
eview_and_Meta-analysis
Mendoza, J., Rodriguez, L., & Sanchez, M. (2023). Impact of Artificial Intelligence on
https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/628fca0d-9594-3496-b035-1125e6a5b69e/
Mohammad and Mansour (2020) Platform for teaching mobile robotics. Journal of Intelligent &
Nworgu, 2015) Analyzing the impact of artificial intelligence and computational sciences on
Peras, A., Smith, J., & Garcia, M. (2023). Impact of artificial intelligence involvement on
https://r.search.yahoo.com/_ylt=Awr1QbG.ojlmM_cAAGGzRwx.;_ylu=Y29sbwNzZz
MEcG9zAzYEdnRpZAMEc2VjA3Ny/RV=2/RE=1715082047/RO=10/RU=https%3a
%2f%2fwww.multiresearchjournal.com%2fdownload-update%2ffile-archive-
1702714949.pdf%2fid-2076/RK=2/RS=mbyU0KWDo4B0fWWIE3h9cdU5mEk-
40
questions.html
Salido, J. (2023). The introduction of artificial intelligence into education: A transformative shift
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/376260972_Impact_of_AI-
Powered_Learning_Tools_on_Student_Understanding_and_Academic_Performance
41
APPENDICES
Transmittal Letter to the High School Department Principal of Rizal Memorial Institute of
Dapitan City Inc.
Alejandro M. Laput
High School Principal
Rizal Memorial Institute of Dapitan City Inc.
Dr. Heinz Luetke Street, Potol,Dapitan City
We, the Grade 12- (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics strand) students of
batch 2023-2024 from Rizal Memorial Institute of Dapitan City, in relation to our research
titled, “Artificial Intelligence: The Impact of Using AI Tools on Grade 11 Students’
Academic Performance at Rizal Memorial Institute of Dapitan City Inc .”, would like to
request permission from your good office to allow us to gather data in the form of a survey
42
questionnaire from your Senior High School students in terms of their class attendance and
grades. The gathered data will be used in the completion of our research project. Rest assured
privacy and personal data of the respondents will be protected.
Respectfully,
Dear Respondent/s,
Good Day!
We, Frienzal S. Labisig, Kent Francis B. Naong, Mary Kyle D. Tagbac, Karylle G. Cabilin,
April Ruth C. Bulay, and John August R. Elopre, are Grade 12 students of the Rizal
Memorial Institute of Dapitan City Inc. We are requesting your full cooperation to answer our
survey questionnaires for our research project titled, “Artificial Intelligence: The Impact of
Using AI Tools on Grade 11 Students’ Academic Performance at Rizal Memorial Institute
of Dapitan City Inc.”. The data gathered from you will be beneficial to our study. Rest assured
that all information that we gathered will be treated with the utmost confidentially and it will be
used for research purposes only.
43
We are hoping you will grant this request and we would earn your positive response. Thank you
for your time. May god bless you!
Respectfully yours,
Respondent’s Consent
I understand the data from this survey questionnaire is deemed beneficial to the researchers and
the school, and that I will answer them with all honesty.
I understand that the data from this survey is deemed beneficial to the researcher and the school.
________________________
Signature over printed name
45
Research Questionnaire
Direction: Put a check (√) on the box which corresponds to your answer.
Part II. Usage of AI tools
Yes
No
If no, you may return the questionnaire to the researchers and do not proceed to the
questions below.
Always
Frequently
Monthly
Occasionally
Rarely
3. If yes, in which subject have AI tools been most helpful? (Check all that apply)
Mathematics
Science
English (e.g. Essay, language etc.)
Other (please specify) _____________
CURRICULUM VITAE
PERSONAL INFORMATION
Age:19
Nationality: Filipino
EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND
PERSONAL INFORMATION
Age:18
Email Address:marytagbac@gmail.com
Nationality: Filipino
EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND
PERSONAL INFORMATION
Age:18
Email Address:karyllecabilin13@gmail.com
Nationality: Filipino
Martial Status:Single
EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND
PERSONAL INFORMATION
Age:19
Nationality: Filipino
EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND
PERSONAL INFORMATION
Age:18
Nationality: Filipino
EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND
PERSONAL INFORMATION
Age:18
Nationality: Filipino
EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND