P.O DOMINGO MONTESSORI SCHOOL, INC.

HIGH SCHOOL
School Year 2023 – 2024

IMMERSION & CAPSTONE RESEARCH

Indicators 5 4 3 2 1
Introduction
1. The introduction consists of an adequate introductory
discussion of the problem
2. Factors that led to the problem are well-discussed in
paragraph 1
3. The in-text citations are properly and clearly presented in
the literature review.
4. The Literature Review is comprehensively done by the
researchers and they only stated researches relevant to their
study.
5. Conceptual framework adequately supports the main
problem or the title of the study.
6. The gap of knowledge of the study is clearly and
specifically stated in paragraph 3 to convince the readers of
the need to conduct such study.
7. The research paradigm is able to provide the direction and
skeletal framework of the study.
8. The aims/ purposes or objectives were thoroughly
presented.
9. In general, the manuscript is scholarly written and has
global impact in educational context as a whole.
Total
Literature Review and Conceptual Framework
1. Cited literature and studies are adequate and relevant to the
research problem.
2. Related literature and studies are recent (ten years ago to
present year of the study).
3. Foreign literature, studies, literature and local studies are
present.
4. Synthesis of the reviewed literature and studies is well-
organized, concise (not too long nor too short) and is based
on the researchers’ logical analysis of the cited materials.
5. The sources of the cited literatures and studies are
appropriately acknowledged and or credited.
6. The researchers were able to determine the construct and
variable of their study from the theory presented.
7. The framework presented conceptualizes the concepts of the
theory appropriately
Total
 Research Methodology
1. The research methodology is well-described and is suitable
or fitting to the research problem.
2. The participants of the study are well-described in terms of
the sample profile, sample size and sampling technique and
or procedure.
3. The research locale is described in terms of its location,
historical background, purposes and objectives and or
mission and vision of the instruction or organization.
4. The procedure and or techniques of gathering data are
explained in complete detail beginning from the time the
researches sought permission to conduct the study.
5. The research instrument is presented and discussed in terms
of its validity and reliability (in case of self-made
instrument)
6. The research design and method employed by the
researchers are correct and relevant to the fulfillment of the
accurate results of the study.
7. The statistical tool selected is appropriate to gather the
needed data and answer the problem of the study.
8. The statistical tool is brief and accurately used to answer the
queries or objectives of the study.
Question and Answer
1. The researchers are willing to answer the question.
2. The researchers provided appropriate and sufficient answer.
Total
OVERALL SCORE

Comments/Suggestions:
__________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________
Description:
Pass The paper is accepted as it is without any need for revisions
Pass with Minor Revision The research is generally acceptable but requires some small, easily addressable
changes before it can be fully accepted. These revisions may include small
adjustments to the methodology, clarification of certain points, or minor editing.
Pass with Major Revision The research has potential but requires significant changes and reevaluation before it
can be accepted.
Fail The research does not meet the necessary standards and is rejected.

Pass Pass with Minor Revision Pass with Major Revision Fail

_________________________________________
Signature of Research Panelist

RAINE C. AGANON
Research Adviser
 P.O DOMINGO MONTESSORI SCHOOL, INC.
HIGH SCHOOL
School Year 2023 – 2024

PRACTICAL RESEARCH 2
PROPOSAL DEFENSE
Group number: Group 2 Grade and section: 12 Harlequin
Researchers: Chua, David, Dela Paz, Gregorio, Griño, Nakamura, Pera
Research Title: PODMSI High School Students’ Digital Literacy in Identifying
Information Disorders in Digital Media
Indicators 5 4 3 2 1
Introduction
1. The introduction consists of an adequate introductory
discussion of the problem
2. Factors that led to the problem are well-discussed in
paragraph 1
3. The in-text citations are properly and clearly presented in
the literature review.
4. The Literature Review is comprehensively done by the
researchers and they only stated researches relevant to their
study.
5. Conceptual framework adequately supports the main
problem or the title of the study.
6. The gap of knowledge of the study is clearly and
specifically stated in paragraph 3 to convince the readers of
the need to conduct such study.
7. The research paradigm is able to provide the direction and
skeletal framework of the study.
8. The aims/ purposes or objectives were thoroughly
presented.
9. In general, the manuscript is scholarly written and has
global impact in educational context as a whole.
Total
Literature Review and Conceptual Framework
8. Cited literature and studies are adequate and relevant to the
research problem.
9. Related literature and studies are recent (five years ago to
present year of the study).
10. Foreign literature, studies, literature and local studies are
present.
11. Synthesis of the reviewed literature and studies is well-
organized, concise (not too long nor too short) and is based
on the researchers’ logical analysis of the cited materials.
12. The sources of the cited literatures and studies are
appropriately acknowledged and or credited.
13. The researchers were able to determine the construct and
variable of their study from the theory presented.
 14. The framework presented conceptualizes the concepts of the
theory appropriately
Total
Research Methodology
10. The research methodology is well-described and is suitable
or fitting to the research problem.
11. The participants of the study are well-described in terms of
the sample profile, sample size and sampling technique and
or procedure.
12. The research locale is described in terms of its location,
historical background, purposes and objectives and or
mission and vision of the instruction or organization.
13. The procedure and or techniques of gathering data are
explained in complete detail beginning from the time the
researches sought permission to conduct the study.
14. The research instrument is presented and discussed in terms
of its validity and reliability (in case of self-made
instrument)
15. The research design and method employed by the
researchers are correct and relevant to the fulfillment of the
accurate results of the study.
16. The statistical tool selected is appropriate to gather the
needed data and answer the problem of the study.
17. The statistical tool is brief and accurately used to answer the
queries or objectives of the study.
Total

Comments/Suggestions:
__________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________
Description:
Pass The paper is accepted as it is without any need for revisions
Pass with Minor Revision The research is generally acceptable but requires some small, easily addressable
changes before it can be fully accepted. These revisions may include small
adjustments to the methodology, clarification of certain points, or minor editing.
Pass with Major Revision The research has potential but requires significant changes and reevaluation before it
can be accepted.
Fail The research does not meet the necessary standards and is rejected.

Pass Pass with Minor Revision Pass with Major Revision Fail

_________________________________________
Signature of Research Panelist

RAINE C. AGANON
Research Adviser
 P.O DOMINGO MONTESSORI SCHOOL, INC.
HIGH SCHOOL
School Year 2023 – 2024

PRACTICAL RESEARCH 2
PROPOSAL DEFENSE
Group number: Group 3 Grade and section: 12 Harlequin
Researchers: Chichioco, De Gracia, Fernandez, Lopez, Pangan, Santiago, Siongco, Tibangin
Research Title: Difficulties Faced By Senior High School STEM Students of P.O. Domingo
Montessori School Inc. High School in Solving Mathematical Problems
Indicators 5 4 3 2 1
Introduction
1. The introduction consists of an adequate introductory
discussion of the problem
2. Factors that led to the problem are well-discussed in
paragraph 1
3. The in-text citations are properly and clearly presented in
the literature review.
4. The Literature Review is comprehensively done by the
researchers and they only stated researches relevant to their
study.
5. Conceptual framework adequately supports the main
problem or the title of the study.
6. The gap of knowledge of the study is clearly and
specifically stated in paragraph 3 to convince the readers of
the need to conduct such study.
7. The research paradigm is able to provide the direction and
skeletal framework of the study.
8. The aims/ purposes or objectives were thoroughly
presented.
9. In general, the manuscript is scholarly written and has
global impact in educational context as a whole.
Total
Literature Review and Conceptual Framework
1. Cited literature and studies are adequate and relevant to the
research problem.
2. Related literature and studies are recent (five years ago to
present year of the study).
3. Foreign literature, studies, literature and local studies are
present.
4. Synthesis of the reviewed literature and studies is well-
organized, concise (not too long nor too short) and is based
on the researchers’ logical analysis of the cited materials.
5. The sources of the cited literatures and studies are
appropriately acknowledged and or credited.
6. The researchers were able to determine the construct and
variable of their study from the theory presented.
7. The framework presented conceptualizes the concepts of the
theory appropriately
 Total
Research Methodology
1. The research methodology is well-described and is suitable
or fitting to the research problem.
2. The participants of the study are well-described in terms of
the sample profile, sample size and sampling technique and
or procedure.
3. The research locale is described in terms of its location,
historical background, purposes and objectives and or
mission and vision of the instruction or organization.
4. The procedure and or techniques of gathering data are
explained in complete detail beginning from the time the
researches sought permission to conduct the study.
5. The research instrument is presented and discussed in terms
of its validity and reliability (in case of self-made
instrument)
6. The research design and method employed by the
researchers are correct and relevant to the fulfillment of the
accurate results of the study.
7. The statistical tool selected is appropriate to gather the
needed data and answer the problem of the study.
8. The statistical tool is brief and accurately used to answer the
queries or objectives of the study.
Total

Comments/Suggestions:
__________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________
Description:
Pass The paper is accepted as it is without any need for revisions
Pass with Minor Revision The research is generally acceptable but requires some small, easily addressable
changes before it can be fully accepted. These revisions may include small
adjustments to the methodology, clarification of certain points, or minor editing.
Pass with Major Revision The research has potential but requires significant changes and reevaluation before it
can be accepted.
Fail The research does not meet the necessary standards and is rejected.

Pass Pass with Minor Revision Pass with Major Revision Fail

_________________________________________
Signature of Research Panelist

RAINE C. AGANON
Research Adviser
 P.O DOMINGO MONTESSORI SCHOOL, INC.
HIGH SCHOOL
School Year 2023 – 2024

PRACTICAL RESEARCH 2
PROPOSAL DEFENSE
Group number: Group 4 Grade and section: 12 Harlequin
Researchers: Beltran, Dayrit, Dela Cruz, Lampa, Pioquinto, Roxas, Subillaga
Research Title: Productivity Levels of PODMSI High School Students in Campus-Based
Informal Learning Spaces
Indicators 5 4 3 2 1
Introduction
1. The introduction consists of an adequate introductory
discussion of the problem
2. Factors that led to the problem are well-discussed in
paragraph 1
3. The in-text citations are properly and clearly presented in
the literature review.
4. The Literature Review is comprehensively done by the
researchers and they only stated researches relevant to their
study.
5. Conceptual framework adequately supports the main
problem or the title of the study.
6. The gap of knowledge of the study is clearly and
specifically stated in paragraph 3 to convince the readers of
the need to conduct such study.
7. The research paradigm is able to provide the direction and
skeletal framework of the study.
8. The aims/ purposes or objectives were thoroughly
presented.
9. In general, the manuscript is scholarly written and has
global impact in educational context as a whole.
Total
Literature Review and Conceptual Framework
1. Cited literature and studies are adequate and relevant to the
research problem.
2. Related literature and studies are recent (five years ago to
present year of the study).
3. Foreign literature, studies, literature and local studies are
present.
4. Synthesis of the reviewed literature and studies is well-
organized, concise (not too long nor too short) and is based
on the researchers’ logical analysis of the cited materials.
5. The sources of the cited literatures and studies are
appropriately acknowledged and or credited.
6. The researchers were able to determine the construct and
variable of their study from the theory presented.
7. The framework presented conceptualizes the concepts of the
theory appropriately
 Total
Research Methodology
1. The research methodology is well-described and is suitable
or fitting to the research problem.
2. The participants of the study are well-described in terms of
the sample profile, sample size and sampling technique and
or procedure.
3. The research locale is described in terms of its location,
historical background, purposes and objectives and or
mission and vision of the instruction or organization.
4. The procedure and or techniques of gathering data are
explained in complete detail beginning from the time the
researches sought permission to conduct the study.
5. The research instrument is presented and discussed in terms
of its validity and reliability (in case of self-made
instrument)
6. The research design and method employed by the
researchers are correct and relevant to the fulfillment of the
accurate results of the study.
7. The statistical tool selected is appropriate to gather the
needed data and answer the problem of the study.
8. The statistical tool is brief and accurately used to answer the
queries or objectives of the study.
Total

Comments/Suggestions:
__________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________
Description:
Pass The paper is accepted as it is without any need for revisions
Pass with Minor Revision The research is generally acceptable but requires some small, easily addressable
changes before it can be fully accepted. These revisions may include small
adjustments to the methodology, clarification of certain points, or minor editing.
Pass with Major Revision The research has potential but requires significant changes and reevaluation before it
can be accepted.
Fail The research does not meet the necessary standards and is rejected.

Pass Pass with Minor Revision Pass with Major Revision Fail

_________________________________________
Signature of Research Panelist

RAINE C. AGANON
Research Adviser