DKP V 3-0 - EN
DKP V 3-0 - EN
DKP V 3-0 - EN
1
Content
1. Purpose of the document ............................................................................................................... 3
2. Requirements for trust service providers, later only („TSP“).......................................................... 5
2.1. Common requirements for all TSP .......................................................................................... 5
2.2. Common requirements for all QTSP ..................................................................................... 10
2.3. Requirements for QTSP issuing qualified certificates ........................................................... 16
2.3.1 Requirements for QTSP issuing qualified certificates for website authentication ........... 21
2.4. Requirements for QTSP providing qualified validation service for qualified electronic
signatures and/or qualified electronic seals ..................................................................................... 22
2.5. Requirements for QTSP providing qualified preservation service for qualified electronic
signatures and/or qualified electronic seals ..................................................................................... 25
2.6. Requirements for QTSP issuing qualified electronic time stamps ........................................ 26
3. Requirements for basic content of conformity assessment report .............................................. 28
4. Abbreviations ................................................................................................................................ 29
5. Sources .......................................................................................................................................... 30
2
1. Purpose of the document
The aim of the document is to specify the requirements for accreditation of conformity assessment
bodies, (later only „CAB“) by national accreditation body (later only „NAB“). The document contains
the list of applicable requirements of eIDAS (Regulation (EU) No 910/2014 of the European
Parliament and of the Council of 23. July 2014 on electronic identification and trust services for
electronic transactions in the internal market and repealing Directive 1999/93/EC) for qualified trust
service providers and for qualified trust services provided by them, references to relevant parts of
technical norms, standards and specifications. By meeting these requirements, it is possible to
demonstrate conformity with requirements of eIDAS regulation. This document contain also a list of
technical norms, standards and specifications related to a particular area. It ought to be mentioned,
that some of the requirements of the regulation are not covered by existing technical norms,
standards and specifications. Taking into consideration that the regulation targets at technological
neutrality, it is not possible to set out the mandatory list of norms, by their fulfilling (only of them)
the trust service provider could demonstrate meeting of requirements laid down by eIDAS
Regulation.
The requirements are based on ČSN EN ISO/IEC 17065 standard (CONFORMITY ASSESSMENT --
REQUIREMENTS FOR BODIES CERTIFYING PRODUCTS, PROCESSES AND SERVICES) as a general framework
laying down requirements for for bodies certifying products, processes and services. General
standard ČSN EN ISO/IEC 17065 requires CAB to fulfil:
applicable requirements of ČSN EN ISO/IEC 17021-1 (CONFORMITY ASSESSMENT --
REQUIREMENTS FOR BODIES PROVIDING AUDIT AND CERTIFICATION OF MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS )
applicable requirements of ČSN ISO/IEC 27006 (INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY - SECURITY
TECHNIQUES - REQUIREMENTS FOR BODIES PROVIDING AUDIT AND CERTIFICATION OF
INFORMATION SECURITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS )
Due to general applicability of ČSN EN ISO/IEC 17065, it is necessary to determine special sector
requirements for CABs, which are to perform conformity assessment at qualified trust service
providers (later only „QTSP“). These sector requirements are defined by ČSN EN 319 403 (ELECTRONIC
SIGNATURES AND INFRASTRUCTURES (ESI); TRUST SERVICE PROVIDER CONFORMITY ASSESSMENT -
REQUIREMENTS FOR CONFORMITY ASSESSMENT BODIES ASSESSING TRUST SERVICE PROVIDERS) and specify
both general requirements on CABs and general rules for performing of relevant audits. Above
mentioned applicable requirements of ČSN EN ISO/IEC 17021-1 and ČSN ISO/IEC 27006 are also a
part of ČSN EN 319 4031.
1
See provisions of ČSN EN 319 403: „The present document also incorporates many requirements relating to
the audit of a TSP's management system, as defined in ISO/IEC 17021 [i.12] and in ISO/IEC 27006 [i.11]. These
3
To make the course of conformity assessment really effective, it is necessary to define so called „TSP
audit criteria“, according to which the competence of CABs should be accredited by NAB
and also according to which the conformity assessment itself should be done by CABs at QTSP.
According to ČSN EN 319 403, the audit criteria should be based on following:
a) take into account specificities of the type of trust service to be assessed;
b) ensure that all aspects of the TSP activity are fully covered; and
c) be based on standards, publicly available specifications and/or regulatory requirements.
EXAMPLE: The standards, these criteria could be based on, include ETSI EN 319 401 [i.6], ETSI EN 319
411-1 [i.2], or ETSI EN 319 411-2 [i.3] or ETSI EN 319 421 [i.9]. Regulatory requirements, these criteria
could be based on, include those defined in Regulation (EU) No 910/2014 [i.1].
In this manner, the accredited CABs would be able to carry out not only regular audits according to
Article 20.1 of eIDAS Regulation, but also the initial conformity assessment according to Article 21 of
eIDAS Regulation and ad-hoc conformity assessment according to Article 20.2 of eIDAS Regulation,
- the same audit criteria for all three types of conformity assessment.
It is required that CAB is a certification body and not “only” inspection body or laboratory, because
CAB has to certify providers according to defined audit criteria. Certification requires regular
monitoring of services with the aim to find out, whether the requirements relevant for the product –
service, as well as requirements of permanent effort to improve provided services, are continually
met.
The aim of ČSN EN 319 403 standard is also to enable conformity assessment both according to best
practices and experience and according to technical requirements of eIDAS Regulation.
requirements are incorporated by including text to derived from these documents in the present document, as
well indirectly through references to requirements of ISO/IEC 17021 [i.12].“
4
2. Requirements for trust service providers, later only („TSP“)
The burden of proving intention or negligence of a non-qualified trust service provider shall
lie with the natural or legal person claiming the damages.
In the case of QTSP, intention or negligence shall be presumed unless QTSP proves that the
damage occurred without intention or negligence of that QTSP.
2
eIDAS Regulation contains reference to original Directive 95/46/ES which, with effect from 25 May 2018 was
repealed. References to repealed Directive are deemed as references to Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the
European Parliament and of the Council of 27. April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to
the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/ES
(General Data Protection Regulation). For this reason, the text of the requirement of Article 5 already contains
directly reference to GDPR even though the normative text eIDAS Regulation refers to the original Directive.
3
The abbreviation REQ means specific requirement set out in given standard (REQ - requirement).
5
eIDAS - Article 13.2: Where trust service providers duly inform their customers in advance of the
limitations on the use of the services they provide and where these limitations are recognisable
to third parties, trust service providers shall not be liable for damages arising from the use of services
exceeding the indicated limitations.
eIDAS - Article 13.3: Liability and damages are governed by national rules.
6
eIDAS General Policy Chapter REQ-7.13-03 requires provided
Article Requirements for Trust services and end-user products used in
15 Service Providers (ETSI the provision of these services to be
EN 319 401) accessible for persons with disabilities
(applicable standards should be taken
into consideration (chapter. REQ-7.13-
04), such as EN 301 549).
Note: Conformity with EN 319 411-2
(QTSP issuing QCs) and conformity with
EN 319 421 (QTSP issuing qualified
electronic time stamps) requires also
conformity with Chapter REQ-7.13-03
and Chapter REQ-7.13-04 EN 319 401.
Accessibility
requirements suitable
for public procurement
of ICT products and
services in Europe (ETSI
EN 301 549)
7
eIDAS General Policy However, Chapter 5 (risk assessment)
Article Requirements for Trust does not contain strict requirements for
19(1) Service Providers (ETSI the implementation of selected measures
EN 319 401) (“select” to become “implement”).
8
For TSP issuing For TSP issuing electronic time stamps,
electronic time stamps: ability to demonstrate compliance with
Policy and Security requirements of Article 19(1) is
Requirements for Trust compliance with requirements of
Service Providers issuing chapters 7.8, 7.9, 7.10, 7.12, and 7.13
Time-Stamps (ETSI EN ETSI EN 319 421.
319 421)
notify the supervisory authority and any other competent bodies, such as competent
national authority for information security or data protection authority, of every breach of
security or loss of integrity, which has a significant impact on trust service provided or on
personal data maintained, without undue delay, in any event within 24 hours of the time
they found the breach,
notify without undue delay also the related natural or legal person of security breach or loss
of integrity, if the security breach or loss of integrity can have an adverse effect on the
person,
inform the public, where the disclosure of the breach of security or loss of integrity is in the
public interest and the TSP has been requested by the supervisory authority to do so.
There are no specific ETSI standards, designed specially to address risk management and
technical and organisational measures that TSP must implement to guarantee the safety of provided
services. However, it is possible to follow, for example, ČSN ISO 31000 standard containing directives
for management of risks, organisations are exposed to. Application of these directives may be
adopted to any organisation and its context. The standard provides a common approach to
management of any type of risk and it is not specific to industry or sectors. The standard can be used
throughout the life of the organisation and can be applied to any activity, including decision-making
at all levels. ČSN ISO/IEC 27005 standard, containing information security risk management directives
with support for general concepts specified in ISO/IEC 27001 and in ISO/IEC 27002, is another
9
example of the general standard that can be followed. ČSN ISO/IEC 27005 standard is designed to
support the successful implementation of information security based on access control.
There are also no standards containing requirements for formats and procedures, including time
limits, applicable for the purposes of notification of security breaches and notifications of personal
data breach. However, the ENISA document [6] elaborates this area - contains useful information
describing the different flows of information in the event of reporting of security incidents, proposes
the factual content of the reports, the list of assets and the assessment of the impact with regard to
the integrity, availability and confidentiality.
However, both areas (risk management and the adoption of technical and organisational measures)
are addressed in the context of the provision of specific trust services. Standards for issuance of
qualified certificates and issuance of qualified electronic time stamps are currently available
10
record and keep accessible for an appropriate period of time, including after the
activities of the qualified trust service provider have ceased, all relevant information
concerning data issued and received by the qualified trust service provider, in
particular for the purpose of providing evidence in legal proceedings and for purpose
of ensuring continuity of the service. Such recording may be done electronically
(generalisation of Annex II(i) to Directive 1999/93/EC, a new requirement for keeping
records and making information accessible also after the end of the activity)
have an up-to-date termination plan to ensure continuity of the service (a new
requirement compared to Directive 1999/93/EC)
ensure lawful processing of personal data in accordance with Directive 95/46/ES
(similar to requirements of Article 8 of Directive 1999/93/EC)
Note: eIDAS Regulation also defines in Article 20 the audit regime for QTSP and defines in Article 21
the procedure for initiation of provision of qualified trust services.
Regular audit: qualified trust service providers shall be audited at their own expense
at least once in every 24 months by a conformity assessment body. The purpose of
the audit is to confirm that qualified trust service providers and qualified trust
services provided by them comply with the requirements laid down in this
Regulation. Providers shall submit the resulting conformity assessment report to the
supervisory authority (e.g. Ministry of the Interior).
Ad-hoc audit: The supervisory authority may, at expense of QTSP, perform an audit
at any time or request a conformity assessment body to carry out a conformity
assessment in order to confirm that QTSP themselves and the qualified trust
services provided by QTSP comply with the requirements laid down in this
Regulation.
If QTSP does not remedy the failure to comply with the requirements of eIDAS
Regulation within (where applicable) the specified time limit set out by supervisory
authority, the supervisory authority may, in particular taking into account the
extent, duration and consequence of the non-compliance, withdraw the qualified
status of the provider or of the affected service it provides. The supervisory
authority shall inform the qualified trust service provider of the withdrawal of its
qualified status or of the qualified status of the service concerned.
11
The supervisory authority shall verify that the trust service provider and the trust
service provided by it meet the requirements laid down in eIDAS Regulation.
If the supervisory authority concludes that the trust service provider and the trust
service provided by it meet the requirements, the supervisory authority shall grant
the trust service provider and trust services provided by it the status of a qualified
provider and a qualified service within three months of receipt of the notification. If
the verification is not completed within three months of notification, the
supervisory authority shall inform the provider and indicate the reasons for the
delay and the period during which the verification will be completed.
Qualified trust service providers can start providing a qualified trust service after the
status of qualified provider and qualified service has been published in the trusted
lists.
12
eIDAS EN 319 411-2 Addressed in EN 319 411-2
Article (QTSP issuing qualified through Chapter 5.2 with
24(2). certificates) reference to applicable
a requirements of EN 319 411-1.
Chapter 5.2 EN 319 411-1
refers to the applicable
requirements laid down in
chapter 6.1 EN 319 401.
eIDAS
Article
24(2).
b
EN 319 411-2 Chapter 6.4.4 with reference to
(QTSP issuing qualified 6.4.4 EN 319 411-1 on the
certificates) basis of Chapter 7.2 EN 319
401.
Chapter 6.9.1 with reference to
6.9.1 EN 319 411-1 on the
basis of Chapter 7.1. EN 319
401.
EN 319 421 Chapter 7.2 & 7.3 with
(QTSP issuing qualified reference to applicable
el. time stamps) requirements of EN 319 401
(Chapters 7.1 and 7.2).
13
eIDAS EN 319 411-2 Chapter 6.8.2 with reference to
Article (QTSP issuing qualified Chapter 6.8.2 EN 319 411-1 on
24(2).c certificates) the basis of REQ-7.1.1-04 EN
319 401.
EN 319 421 Chapter 7.2 with reference to
(QTSP issuing qualified applicable requirements of
el. time stamps) Chapter 7.1. EN 319 401
(including Chapter REQ-7.1.1-
04).
eIDAS EN 319 411-2 Chapter 6.1, 6.3.4, 6.3.5 and
Article (QTSP issuing qualified 6.9.4 with reference to
24(2). certificates) Chapters 6.1, 6.3.4, 6.3.5 and
d 6.9.4 EN 319 411-1 (Chapter
6.9.4 follows Chapter 6.2. EN
319 401)
EN 319 421 Chapter 6.3 with reference to
(QTSP issuing qualified applicable requirements of EN
el. time stamps) 319 401 (Chapter 6.2).
14
eIDAS It depends on what type of process within a particular type of service
Article shall be supported by a trusted system as well as in case of different
24(2). ways of providing remote signature service (creation or managing data
e& for creation of electronic signatures), e.g. support of remote signing
24(2).f with advanced or qualified el. signature.
Candidate standards:
- EN 419 221 (Security requirements for trustworthy systems
managing certificates for electronic signatures) - protection
profiles for cryptographic modules used by providers, especially
part 5 –protection profile for cryptographic modules used by
providers.
- EN 419 231 protection profile for trustworthy systems
supporting process of time stamps issuance.
- EN 419 241-1 safety requirements and EN 419 241-2 f protection
profile for QSCD devices for server signature.
- CEN/TS 419 261 (originally prTS 419 221-1, originally prTS
14167-1) – security requirements for trustworthy systems
managing certificates and time stamps.
EN 319 411-2 and EN 319 421 contain requirements for QTSP for use of
trustworthy systems referred to in Article 24(2).e and 24(2).f.
15
eIDAS EN 319 411-2 Chapters 6.2.2, 6.3.4, 6.3.8,
Article (QTSP issuing qualified 6.4.5, 6.4.6, and 6.4.9 with
24(2). certificates) reference to EN 319 411-1
h following EN 319 401.
EN 319 421 Chapters 7.6.5, 7.7.2, 7.8 and
(QTSP issuing qualified 7.12 following EN 319 401.
el. time stamps)
eIDAS EN 319 411-2 Chapter 6.4.9 with reference to
Article (QTSP issuing qualified Chapter 6.4.9 EN 319 411-1
24(2).i certificates) following EN 319 401 Chapter
7.12.
EN 319 421 Chapter 7.14 following EN 319
(QTSP issuing qualified 401 Chapter 7.12.
el. time stamps)
eIDAS EN 319 411-2 Chapters 6.8.4 and 6.8.15 with
Article (QTSP issuing qualified reference to Chapters 6.8.4 and
24(2).j certificates) 6.8.15 EN 319 411-1 following
EN 319 401 Chapter 7.13.
EN 319 421 Chapter 7.15 following Chapter
(QTSP issuing qualified 7.13 EN 319 401.
el. time stamps)
The information referred to in the first subparagraph shall be verified by the qualified trust
service provider either directly or by relying on a third party in accordance with national law:
16
(a) by the physical presence of the natural person or of an authorised representative of the
legal person; or
(b) remotely, using electronic identification means, for which prior to the issuance of the
qualified certificate, a physical presence of the natural person or of an authorised
representative of the legal person was ensured and which meets the requirements set out in
Article 8 with regard to the assurance levels ‘substantial’ or ‘high’; or
(c) by means of a certificate of a qualified electronic signature or of a qualified electronic seal
issued in compliance with point (a) or (b); or
(d) by using other identification methods recognised at national level which provide
equivalent assurance in terms of reliability to physical presence. The equivalent assurance
shall be confirmed by a conformity assessment body.
eIDAS - Article 24.2 (k): QTSP issuing qualified certificates establishes and keeps updated a certificate
database.
eIDAS - Article 24.3: If a qualified trust service provider issuing qualified certificates decides to revoke
a certificate, it shall register such revocation in its certificate database and publish the revocation
status of the certificate in a timely manner, and in any event within 24 hours after the receipt of the
request. The revocation shall become effective immediately upon its publication.
eIDAS - Article 24.4: With regard to paragraph 3, qualified trust service providers issuing qualified
certificates shall provide any relying party with information on the validity or revocation of qualified
certificates issued by them. This information shall be made available at least on a per certificate basis
at any time and beyond the validity period of the certificate in an automated manner that is reliable,
free of charge and efficient.
Requirements for qualified certificates:
Annex I to eIDAS Regulation: Requirements for qualified certificates for electronic signatures
pursuant to Article 28.1
Annex III to eIDAS Regulation: Requirements for qualified certificates for electronic seals
pursuant to Article 38.1
Annex IV to eIDAS Regulation: Requirements for qualified certificates for website
authentication pursuant to Article 45.1
Article 28.3, 38.3, recital č. 65: Qualified certificates may include non-mandatory attributes. Those
attributes shall not affect the interoperability and recognition of qualified electronic signatures/seals.
Article 28.4, 38.4, recital č. 65: If a qualified certificate for electronic signatures/seals has been
revoked after initial activation, it shall lose its validity from the moment of its revocation, and its
status shall not in any circumstances be reverted.
17
If QTSP issues together with qualified certificates for el. signatures or el. seals also qualified
signature/seal creation device, then it must be secured that these means comply with requirements
of Annex II to eIDAS Regulation and also that these means are certified in conformity with Article 30
of eIDAS Regulation by relevant private or public sector bodies designated by Member States. Or it
must be a means considered as a qualified signature creation device on the basis of transitional
measure laid down in Article 51(1) of eIDAS Regulation.
Implementing Decision of the Commission (EU) 2016/650
On 26. April 2016 Implementing Decision of the Commission (EU) 2016/650 of 25. April 2016 was
published in Official Journal of the EU. The Decision states standards for security assessment of
qualified signature and seal creation devices pursuant to Article 30(3) and 39(2) of Regulation (EU)
No. 910/2014 on electronic identification and trust services for electronic transactions in the internal
market http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-
content/EN/TXT/?qid=1438256835547&uri=CELEX:32016D0650. Annex to the Implementing
Decision sets out standards for security assessment of information technology products. These
standards should be used for certification of qualified signature and seal creation devices, if data for
electronic signature creation or data for electronic seal creation are stored in the environment,
which is entirely, but not necessarily exclusively, managed by the user. Related standards shall be
used for certification of devices, which are in physical possession of signing or sealing person (e.g.
chip card, USB token). In this case the standards are laid down which shall be compulsorily used for
certification of the devices in physical possession of signing or sealing person. The Commission will
shortly publish a list of certified qualified electronic signature creation devices and qualified
electronic seal creation devices pursuant to Article 31, respectively Article 39 of eIDAS Regulation. On
this list, the devices, considered as qualified electronic signature creation devices on the basis of
transitional measure laid down in Article 51(1) eIDAS Regulation, will be published as well. (Secure
signature creation devices of which the conformity has been determined in accordance with Article
3(4) of Directive 1999/93/EC shall be considered as qualified electronic signature creation devices
under this Regulation.). The list of certified devices is only informative, not constitutional in nature.
Pending the establishment of the list of standards for security assessment of information technology
products which should be used for certification of qualified electronic signature creation devices or
qualified electronic seal creation devices, if QTSP manages data for electronic signature creation or
data for electronic seal creation, the certification of such devices is based on alternative procedure,
which uses a comparable level of security with standards referred to in Annex to the Decision and
which was notified to the Commission by the relevant public or private sector body.
Except for issuing “own” qualified devices, QTSP can also certify cryptographic keys with
corresponding information about storage in the qualified device, which were generated in the
qualified device the user has in their disposal. In this case, it must be ensured that QTSP has
implemented appropriate processes and procedures to ensure that cryptographic keys were really
generated in the qualified device (i.e. ensuring the origin of the key).
18
eIDAS EN 319 411-2 Chapters 6.2.2 and 6.2.with
Article (QTSP issuing qualified reference to corresponding
24(1) certificates) Chapters 6.2.2 and 6.2.3 EN
319 411-1.
Note.: With regard to
requirements laid down in
Article 24.1(b) of eIDAS
Regulation, it is necessary to use
the electronic identification
means for which the physical
presence of a natural person or
authorised representative of a
legal person has been ensured
prior to the issuance of the QC,
whether it is a means with a
substantial or high level of
assurance.
19
Note: With regard to compliance with Articles 24.3 and 24.4 of eIDAS Regulation, EN 319
411-2 standard is considered not to contain sufficient measures as regards to CRL and
OCSP profiles and the process of their creation and compliance with the requirements laid
down in those Articles of eIDAS Regulation.
The table A.1 in Annex A (informative) of EN 319 411-2 contains the checklist related to
requirements for QTSP issuing QC pursuant to the QCP policy from eIDAS Regulation in
relation to requirements of this technical standard. The table does not contain mapping of
all requirements of eIDAS Regulation set on QTSP issuing QC pursuant to QCP policy, since
some of the requirements of eIDAS Regulation are not technical and do not fall within the
scope of EN 319 411-2.
eIDAS EN 319 411-2 Chapter 6.6.1 with reference to
Article (QTSP issuing qualified corresponding Chapter 6.6.1
28(1) & certificates) EN 319 411-1 requiring
Annex I conformity with relevant EN
319 412 series standard
eIDAS (profile of a certificate)
Article depending on the type of QC.
38(1) &
Annex III
20
eIDAS Temporary suspension of
Article qualified certificates for
28(5) electronic signature and for
electronic seal may be specified
eIDAS at national level.
Article
38(5)
ETSI EN 319 412 should contain sufficient requirements to ensure that QTSPs issuing qualified
certificates meet the applicable eIDAS requirements for the content of certificates.
ETSI EN 319 412 series of standards consists of five parts:
ETSI EN 319 412-1 ELECTRONIC SIGNATURES AND INFRASTRUCTURES (ESI); CERTIFICATE PROFILES; PART 1:
OVERVIEW AND COMMON DATA STRUCTURES
ETSI EN 319 412-2 ELECTRONIC SIGNATURES AND INFRASTRUCTURES (ESI); CERTIFICATE PROFILES; PART 2:
CERTIFICATE PROFILE FOR CERTIFICATES ISSUED TO NATURAL PERSONS
ETSI EN 319 412-3 ELECTRONIC SIGNATURES AND INFRASTRUCTURES (ESI); CERTIFICATE PROFILES; PART 3:
CERTIFICATE PROFILE FOR CERTIFICATES ISSUED TO LEGAL PERSONS
ETSI EN 319 412-4 ELECTRONIC SIGNATURES AND INFRASTRUCTURES (ESI); CERTIFICATE PROFILES; PART 4:
CERTIFICATE PROFILE FOR WEB SITE CERTIFICATES
ETSI EN 319 412-5 ELECTRONIC SIGNATURES AND INFRASTRUCTURES (ESI); CERTIFICATE PROFILES; PART 5:
QCSTATEMENTS
In the case of QTSP statement of compliance with ETSI EN 319 412 series of standards, CAB verifies
on a sample of issued certificates that the format of these certificates complies with ETSI EN 319 412-
2, ETSI EN 319 412-3 and ETSI EN 319 412-5.
21
Guidance for Auditors and CSPs on ETSI Guidance document for
TS 102 042 for Issuing Publicly-Trusted auditors (smaller scope
TLS/SSL Certificates (ETSI TR 103 123) of requirements than
foreseen in eIDAS
Regulation)
Partially covered: Documents from CAB Forum represent industry standards used by the most
important web browser makers. However, the requirements set out in these standards are primarily
aimed at ensuring the identity of the website and its owner and do not fully meet the requirements
for qualified website authentication certificates pursuant to eIDAS Regulation. ETSI standards refer to
these standards and complements them with other specific requirements.
A possible implementing act under Article 45(2) of eIDAS Regulation would most likely refer to ETSI
EN 319 412-4 standard (“Electronic Signatures and Infrastructures (ESI); Certificate Profiles; Part 4:
Certificate profile for web site certificates”).
In the case of QTSP statement of compliance with ETSI EN 319 412 series standard, CAB shall verify
on a sample of issued certificates that the format of these certificates complies with ETSI EN 319 412-
4 and ETSI EN 319 412-5.
22
eIDAS - Article 33.1 (a) : QTSP provides validation in compliance with Article 32(1)
eIDAS – Article 33.1 (b) : QTSP allows relying parties to receive the result of the validation process in
an automated manner, which is reliable, efficient and bears the advanced electronic signature or
advanced electronic seal of the provider of the qualified validation service. In conformity with Article
32 (2), the service has to allow the relying party to detect any security relevant issues.
23
In February 2019, ETSI published updated technical specifications of TS 119 312 (ELECTRONIC
SIGNATURES AND INFRASTRUCTURES ; CRYPTOGRAPHIC SUITES) – These are updates to the original
specifications TS 102 176-1, known as “Algo paper“. The document contains recommendations for
selections of appropriate algorithms to ensure security and interoperability of electronic signatures
depending on required level of security.
The issue of validation of qualified electronic signatures and seals is also related to the issue of
formats of advanced electronic signatures and seals, see COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING DECISION OF THE
(EU) 2015/1506 OF 8. AUGUST 2015, LAYING DOWN SPECIFICATIONS RELATING TO FORMATS OF ADVANCED
ELECTRONIC SIGNATURES AND ADVANCED SEALS TO BE RECOGNISED BY PUBLIC SECTOR BODIES PURSUANT
ARTICLE 27 (5) AND ARTICLE 37(5) OF REGULATION (EU) NO 910/2014 OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND
OF THE COUNCIL ON ELECTRONIC IDENTIFICATION AND TRUST SERVICES IN THE INTERNAL MARKET.
24
ETSI EN 319 162-1 ELECTRONIC SIGNATURES AND I NFRASTRUCTURES (ESI); ASSOCIATED SIGNATURE
CONTAINERS (ASIC); PART 1: BUILDING BLOCKS AND ASIC BASELINE CONTAINERS
ETSI EN 319 162-2 ELECTRONIC SIGNATURES AND I NFRASTRUCTURES (ESI); ASSOCIATED SIGNATURE
CONTAINERS (ASIC ); PART 2: ADDITIONAL ASIC CONTAINERS
CAB will have a pre-prepared sample of electronically signed documents to verify the quality of
validation of qualified electronic signatures/seals. CAB can verify this sample in advance using
(for example) ETSI Signature Conformance Checker (https://signatures-conformance-
checker.etsi.org/pub/index.shtml - check of conformity of format AdES with ETSI TS / EN and demo
DSS (https://ec.europa.eu/cefdigital/DSS/webapp-demo/home).
eIDAS Article
34(2) PDF/A Specification (ISO 19005-1, Adobe)
25
Electronic archiving - Part 1: Specifications
concerning the design and the operation of an
information system for electronic information
preservation (ISO/IEC ISO 14641-1:2012)
eIDAS Regulation does not specify requirements for procedures and technologies that can be used to
ensure the trustworthiness of qualified electronic signature/qualified electronic seal even after the
technical validity period has expired. Therefore, it is not possible to assess the conformity of
standards with eIDAS Regulation.
26
eIDAS - Article 42.1 : Qualified time stamp shall meet following requirements:
it binds the date and time to data in such a manner as to reasonably preclude the possibility
of the data being changed undetectably; and
it is based on an accurate time source linked to Coordinated Universal Time; and
it is signed using an advanced electronic signature or sealed with an advanced electronic seal
of the qualified trust service provider, or by some equivalent method.
Conformity with the standard shall ensure that connection of date and time with data is done in such
a way that the possibility of undetectable data change is reasonable prevented and also the
requirements for a source of accurate time that is associated with Coordinated Universal Time are
ensured. Standard ETSI TS 102 023, which was used for time stamp authorities certification, has been
updated under mandate M460 and divided into two standards:
ETSI EN 319 421 specifying requirements for policy and security requirements related to
operation and management practices of TSP issuing time stamps. ANSSI RGS A5 further
reinforces these requirements, but contains some specific French requirements, which may
not be compatible with current practice in other states.
Conformity with ETSI EN 319 422 ensures binding the date and time with data in issued
electronic time stamps.
ANSSI DCSSI-PP 2008/07 and CEN EN 419 231 are protection profiles evaluated according to Common
Criteria for time stamp authority system.
27
3. Requirements for basic content of conformity assessment report
Conformity assessment body shall issue so-called conformity assessment report following the
conformity assessment.
Trust service provider has to submit this report to the supervisory authority (MV ČR) not only in
connection with notification of intention of the trust service provider to initiate providing of
qualified trust service, but also in connection with regular audit (qualified trust service providers shall
be audited by the conformity assessment body at least once every 24 months at their own expense)
or in connection with ad-hoc audit (the supervisory authority may audit the QTSP at any time at their
expense or ask conformity assessment body to carry out conformity assessment to confirm that the
QTSP and the qualified trust services provided by the QTSP meet the requirements laid down in this
Regulation).
In particular, the conformity assessment report should contain recommendations, whether it is
possible to make a certification decision. The report should also state the result of audit, e.g. the
audited service is in compliance and meets the requirements or the audited service does not meet
the requirements, in this case, the certificate cannot be issued (see 7.6 and 7.7 of ČSN EN ISO/IEC
17065:2013). This does not apply if non-conformities were found during the audit but do not affect
meeting the requirements or provision of the service in question and if the non-conformities have to
be rectified within 3 months depending on the seriousness of the error, see Chapter 7.6 ČSN EN 319
403. In certification decision, at least identification of conformity assessment body, identification of
trust service provider, identification of assessed trust service, the start date and the end date of the
assessment, result of the assessment and specification of the requirements (applicable requirements
of eIDAS Regulation) against which the conformity assessment has been carried out, shall be stated.
In conformity assessment report, it should be specified how the provider complies with the
applicable requirements of eIDAS Regulation (e.g. by complying with certain provision of specific
standard), see requirements laid down on content of audit report in Chapter 7.4.4. ČSN EN 319 403.
28
4. Abbreviations
[1] DKP - Document specifying the requirements for qualified trust service providers and qualified
trust services provided by them
[2] eIDAS Regulation – Regulation (EU) No 910/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council
of 23. July 2014 on electronic identification and trust services for electronic transactions in the
internal market and repealing Directive 1999/93/ES)
[3] CAB - conformity assessment body
[4] NAB - national accreditation body
[5] QTSP - qualified trust service providers
[6] TSP - trust service providers
[7] REQ it indicates a specific requirement given in the standard (REQ - requirement)
[8] GDPR - Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016
on the protection of natural persons with regard to processing of personal data and on the free
movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/ES (General Data Protection Regulation)
[9] AdES – advanced electronic signature
[10] DSS – Digital Signature Service
29
5. Sources
[1] ENISA: Analysis of standards related to Trust Service Providers Mapping of requirements of eIDAS
to existing standards, https://www.enisa.europa.eu/publications/tsp_standards_2015.
[2] ETSI TR 119 000 V1.2.1 Electronic Signatures and Infrastructures (ESI); The framework for
standardization of signatures: overview
[3] Regulation (EU) No 910/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23. July 2014 on
elektronic identification and trust services for electronic transactions in the internal market and
repealing Directive 1999/93/ES), http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-
content/EN/TXT/?uri=uriserv:OJ.L_.2014.257.01.0073.01.ENG
[4] Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2016/650 of 25 April 2016 laying down standards for
security assessment of qualified signature and seal creation devices pursuant to Articles 30(3) and
39(2) of Regulation (EU) No 910/2014 of European Parliament and of the Council on electronic
identification and trust services for electronic transactions in the internal market. http://eur-
lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?qid=1438256835547&uri=CELEX:32016D0650.
[5] Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2015/1506 of 8. September 2015 laying down
specifications relating to formats of advanced electronic signatures and advanced seals to be
recognised by public sector bodies pursuant to Article 27(5) and 37(5) of Regulation (EU) No
910/2014 of European Parliament and of the Council on electronic identification and trust services
for electronic transactions in the internal market. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-
content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:JOL_2015_235_R_0006.
[6] ENISA: Article 19 Incident reporting, https://www.enisa.europa.eu/publications/article19-
incident-reporting-framework
30