0% found this document useful (0 votes)
21 views7 pages

Reliability and Validity

The document discusses the concepts of reliability and validity in research. Reliability refers to consistency of measurement, while validity refers to accuracy. The document provides examples and types of both reliability and validity, including test-retest, interrater, internal consistency, construct, content, and criterion.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
21 views7 pages

Reliability and Validity

The document discusses the concepts of reliability and validity in research. Reliability refers to consistency of measurement, while validity refers to accuracy. The document provides examples and types of both reliability and validity, including test-retest, interrater, internal consistency, construct, content, and criterion.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 7

Reliability and Validity

By Tayyeb Ramzan
Reliability and Validity
• Reliability is about the consistency of a measure
• Validity is about the accuracy of a measure
What does it tell you?
• Reliability • Validity
• The extent to which the results • The extent to which the results
can be reproduced when the really measure what they are
research is repeated under the supposed to measure.
same conditions.
How is it assessed?
• Reliability • Validity
• By checking the consistency of • By checking how well the results
results across time, across correspond to established
different observers, and across theories and other measures of
parts of the test itself. the same concept.
How do they relate?
• Reliability • Validity
• A reliable measurement is not • A valid measurement is generally
always valid: the results might reliable: if a test produces
be reproducible, but they’re not accurate results, they should be
necessarily correct. reproducible.
Type of reliability
Type of reliability What does it assess? Example
Test-retest The consistency of a measure across time: do A group of participants complete a
you get the same results when you repeat the questionnaire designed to measure personality
measurement? traits. If they repeat the questionnaire days,
weeks or months apart and give the same
answers, this indicates high test-retest reliability.
Interrater The consistency of a measure across raters or Based on an assessment criteria checklist, five
observers: do you get the same results when examiners submit substantially different results
different people conduct the same for the same student project. This indicates that
measurement? the assessment checklist has low inter-rater
reliability (for example, because the criteria are
too subjective).

Internal consistency The consistency of the measurement itself: do You design a questionnaire to measure self-
you get the same results from different parts of esteem. If you randomly split the results into
a test that are designed to measure the same two halves, there should be a strong
thing? correlation between the two sets of results. If
the two results are very different, this indicates
low internal consistency.
Types of validity To assess the validity of a cause-and-effect
relationship, you also need to consider internal
validity (the design of the experiment)
and external validity (the generalizability of the
results).

Type of validity What does it assess? Example


Construct The adherence of a measure to existing theory and A self-esteem questionnaire could be assessed by
knowledge of the concept being measured. measuring other traits known or assumed to be
related to the concept of self-esteem (such as social
skills and optimism). Strong correlation between the
scores for self-esteem and associated traits would
indicate high construct validity.
Content The extent to which the measurement covers all A test that aims to measure a class of students’ level
aspects of the concept being measured. of Spanish contains reading, writing and speaking
components, but no listening component. Experts
agree that listening comprehension is an essential
aspect of language ability, so the test lacks content
validity for measuring the overall level of ability in
Spanish.
Criterion The extent to which the result of a measure A survey is conducted to measure the political
corresponds to other valid measures of the same opinions of voters in a region. If the results
concept. accurately predict the later outcome of an election
in that region, this indicates that the survey has high
criterion validity.

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy