CWP 11460 2024 16 05 2024 Final Order

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 3

Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:069217-DB

CWP-11460-2024
2024 (O&M) -1-

119
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
CHANDIGARH

CWP-11460-2024 (O&M)
Date of Decision: 16.05.2024.2024
YUDHBIR SINGH CHAUHAN AND OTHERS
. . . . Petitionerss
Vs.
STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS
. . . . Respondentss
****
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA
HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUDEEPTI SHARMA
****
Present: Mr. Jawahar Lal Goyal, Advocate with
Mr.
Mr. Parth Goyal, Advocate
for the petitioners.

Ms. Tanisha Peshawaria, DAG, Haryana.


****
SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA, J.(Oral)

1. Notice of motion.
motion

2. Ms. Tanisha
anisha Peshawaria, DAG, Haryana accepts notice on behalf of

State.

3. Taking into consideration that the issue stands finally adjudicated by

this Court in terms of an earlier judgment passed by the Coordinate

Bench in Union of India and others vs. Vijay Kumar in CWP


CWP-24010--

08.11.2023 and the judgment passed by the Supreme


2023, decided on 08.11.2023,

Court in The Director (Administration and HR) KPTCL and others vs.

C.P. Mundinamani and others, 2023 SCC Online SC 401,, which we

have noticed in the judgment dated 15.04.2024 passed by this Court in

CWP-14857
14857-2023
2023 titled as Jagdish Rai Gupt
Guptaa vs. State of Haryana

and others,
others we intend to dispose of this petition in the same terms for

the purpose of disposal.

1 of 3
::: Downloaded on - 20-05-2024 14:03:01 :::
Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:069217-DB

CWP-11460-2024
2024 (O&M) -2-

4. It would be apposite to quote the order passed by us earlier on

15.04.2024 in Jagdish Rai Gupta (supra), which is as under:

“7. We therefore, read down the Rule 10 of the


Rules, 2008 to mean that one annual increment would be
earned to an employee on the last day of his service, for the
services rendered by him in the preceding one year from
the date of retirement with good behaviour and efficiency.
Accordingly, the ‘uniform date of annual increment’
mentioned in Rule 10 would mean completion of the year
as on 1st of July of every year and 1st of January of a year.
8. Petitioner has retired on 31st of March of the
concerned year. Annual
Annual increment is to be granted to an
employee on account of his past service of 12 months. The
Rule also provides that if a person has rendered more than
six months, he would be deemed to have completed 12
months of service for the purpose of grant of increm
increment.
Since the petitioner, who retired on 31st of March of the
concerned year, has completed 09 months of service in a
year, he was entitled to receive the benefit of increment for
one year. Having reached to the aforesaid finding, we find
that the case of the persons who have retired on 31st of
March of the year would also be entitled for the benefit in
terms of the judgment passed in the case of Director
(Administration and HR) KPTCL and others (supra).
9. The writ petition is accordingly allowed as
abov
above.
10. Accordingly, it is directed that the petitioner
would be entitled to one increment and the respondents are
directed to revise his retiral benefits and pension
accordingly.
11. Said exercise shall be completed within a
period of three months.”
months.

2 of 3
::: Downloaded on - 20-05-2024 14:03:01 :::
Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:069217-DB

CWP-11460-2024
2024 (O&M) -3-

5. The facts of the present case are also similar, and the petitioners herein

too have been denied one increment to which they were entitled in

terms of the law laid down by the Apex Court.

6. In the circumstances, it is directed that the petitioner


petitioners would be entitled
led

to one additional increment at the time of retirement, and the

respondents are directed to revise their retiral benefits and pension

accordingly.

7. As we are deciding the writ petition at this stage itself without asking

the respondents to file reply on account of question of law having been

settled, we direct that while implementing our orders, the concerned

authority shall examine the service record of the petitioner


petitioners with regard

to the entitlement of increment as per our judgment supra, and if the

petitioner fall in the same category, the orders shall be passed, the
petitioners

pension shall be revised accordingly and arrears shall be released

within a period of three months. However,


However, the petitioner
petitioners would not be

entitled to any further interest on the arrears.

8. Writ Petition stands disposed of in aforesaid terms.

(SANJEEV
SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA
SHARMA)
JUDGE

((SUDEEPTI SHARMA)
JUDGE
May 16,, 2024
Mohit goyal

1. Whether speaking/reasoned? Yes/No


2. Whether reportable? Yes/No

3 of 3
::: Downloaded on - 20-05-2024 14:03:01 :::

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy