Acid mine drainage

Acid mine drainage, acid and metalliferous

drainage (AMD), or acid rock drainage (ARD) is
the outflow of acidic water from metal mines and coal
mines.

Acid rock drainage occurs naturally within some

environments as part of the rock weathering process
but is exacerbated by large-scale earth disturbances
characteristic of mining and other large construction
activities, usually within rocks containing an
abundance of sulfide minerals. Areas where the earth
has been disturbed (e.g. construction sites or highway
Rio Tinto in Spain presents an acid drainage of
construction) may create acid rock drainage. In many both natural and artificial origin (mining)
localities, the liquid that drains from coal stocks, coal
handling facilities, coal washeries, and coal waste tips
can be highly acidic, and in such cases it is treated as
acid rock drainage. This liquid often contains highly
toxic metals, such as copper or iron. These, combined
with reduced pH, have a detrimental impact on the
streams' aquatic environments.

The same type of chemical reactions and processes

may occur through the disturbance of acid sulfate soils
formed under coastal or estuarine conditions after the
last major sea level rise, and constitutes a similar
environmental hazard. Rocks stained by ferrous precipitate from acid
mine drainage on Shamokin Creek in
Northumberland County, Pennsylvania
Nomenclature
Historically, the acidic discharges from active or
abandoned mines were called acid mine drainage, or AMD. The term acid rock drainage, or ARD, was
introduced in the 1980s and 1990s to indicate that acidic drainage can originate from sources other than
mines.[1] For example, a paper presented in 1991 at a major international conference on this subject was
titled: "The Prediction of Acid Rock Drainage – Lessons from the Database".[2] Both AMD and ARD refer
to low pH or acidic waters caused by the oxidation of sulfide minerals, though ARD is the more generic
name.
In cases where drainage from a mine is not acidic and has dissolved metals or metalloids, or was originally
acidic, but has been neutralized along its flow path, then it is described as "neutral mine drainage",[3]
"mining-influenced water"[4] or otherwise. None of these other names have gained general acceptance.

Occurrence
Sub-surface mining often progresses below the water table, so
water must be constantly pumped out of the mine in order to
prevent flooding. When a mine is abandoned, the pumping ceases,
and water floods the mine. This introduction of water is the initial
step in most acid rock drainage situations. Tailings piles or ponds,
mine waste rock dumps,[3] and coal spoils are also an important
source of acid mine drainage.

After being exposed to air and water, oxidation of metal sulfides

(often pyrite, which is iron-sulfide) within the surrounding rock and In this case, the pyrite has dissolved
overburden generates acidity. Colonies of bacteria and archaea away yielding a cube shape and
greatly accelerate the decomposition of metal ions, although the residual gold. This break down is the
reactions also occur in an abiotic environment. These microbes, main driver of acid mine drainage.

called extremophiles for their ability to survive in harsh conditions,

occur naturally in the rock, but limited water and oxygen supplies usually keep their numbers low.
Extremophiles known as acidophiles especially favor the low pH levels of abandoned mines. In particular,
Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans is a key contributor to pyrite oxidation.[5]

Metal mines may generate highly acidic discharges where the ore is a sulfide mineral or is associated with
pyrite. In these cases the predominant metal ion may not be iron but rather zinc, copper, or nickel. The most
commonly mined ore of copper, chalcopyrite, is itself a copper-iron-sulfide and occurs with a range of other
sulfides. Thus, copper mines are often major culprits of acid mine drainage.

At some mines, acidic drainage is detected within 2–5 years after mining begins, whereas at other mines, it
is not detected for several decades. In addition, acidic drainage may be generated for decades or centuries
after it is first detected. For this reason, acid mine drainage is considered a serious long-term environmental
problem associated with mining.

Chemistry
The chemistry of oxidation of pyrites, the production of ferrous ions and subsequently ferric ions, is very
complex, and this complexity has considerably inhibited the design of effective treatment options.[6]

Although a host of chemical processes contribute to acid mine drainage, pyrite oxidation is by far the
greatest contributor. A general equation for this process is:[7]
+
2 FeS2(s) + 7 O2(g) + 2 H2O(l) → 2 Fe2+ (aq) + 4 SO2−
4 (aq) + 4 H (aq)

The oxidation of the sulfide to sulfate solubilizes the ferrous iron (iron(II)), which is subsequently oxidized
to ferric iron (iron(III)):
+
4 Fe2+ (aq) + O2(g) + 4 H (aq) → 4 Fe3+ (aq) + 2 H2O(l)
Either of these reactions can occur spontaneously or can be catalyzed by microorganisms that derive energy
from the oxidation reaction. The ferric cations produced can also oxidize additional pyrite and reduce into
ferrous ions:[8]
2− +
FeS2(s) + 14 Fe3+ (aq) + 8 H2O(l) → 15 Fe2+ (aq) + 2 SO4 (aq) + 16 H (aq)

The net effect of these reactions is to release H+, which lowers the pH and maintains the solubility of the
ferric ion.

Effects

Effects on pH
Water temperatures as high as 47 °C (117 °F)[9] have been
measured underground at the Iron Mountain Mine, and the pH can
be as low as −3.6.[10]

Organisms which cause acid mine drainage can thrive in waters

with pH very close to zero. Negative pH[11] occurs when water
evaporates from already acidic pools thereby increasing the
concentration of hydrogen ions.

About half of the coal mine discharges in Pennsylvania have pH

under 5.[12] However, a portion of mine drainage in both the
bituminous and anthracite regions of Pennsylvania is alkaline,
because limestone in the overburden neutralizes acid before the
drainage emanates.

Yellow boy
Yellow boy in a stream receiving acid
When the pH of acid mine drainage is raised past 3, either through
drainage from surface coal mining
contact with fresh water or neutralizing minerals, previously soluble
iron(III) ions precipitate as iron(III) hydroxide, a yellow-orange
solid colloquially known as yellow boy.[13] Other types of iron precipitates are possible, including iron
oxides and oxyhydroxides, and sulfates such as jarosite. All these precipitates can discolor water and
smother plant and animal life on the streambed, disrupting stream ecosystems (a specific offense under the
Fisheries Act in Canada). The process also produces additional hydrogen ions, which can further decrease
pH. In some cases, the concentrations of iron hydroxides in yellow boy are so high, the precipitate can be
recovered for commercial use in pigments.[14]

Trace metal and semi-metal contamination

Many acid rock discharges also contain elevated levels of potentially toxic metals, especially nickel and
copper with lower levels of a range of trace and semi-metal ions such as lead, arsenic, aluminium, and
manganese. The elevated levels of heavy metals can only be dissolved in waters that have a low pH, as is
found in the acidic waters produced by pyrite oxidation. In the coal belt around the south Wales valleys in
the UK highly acidic nickel-rich discharges from coal stocking sites have proved to be particularly
troublesome.

Effects on aquatic wildlife

Acid mine drainage also affects the wildlife living within the affected body of water. Aquatic
macroinvertebrates living in streams or parts of streams affected by acid mine drainage show fewer
individuals, less diversity, and lower biomass. Many species of fish also cannot tolerate the pollution.[15]
Among the macroinvertebrates, certain species can be found at only certain levels of pollution, while other
species can be found over a wide range.[16]

Identification and prediction

In a mining setting it is leading practice to carry out a geochemical assessment of mine materials during the
early stages of a project to determine the potential for AMD. The geochemical assessment aims to map the
distribution and variability of key geochemical parameters, acid generating and element leaching
characteristics.[17]

The assessment may include:[17]

1. Sampling;
2. Static geochemical testwork (e.g. acid-base accounting, sulfur speciation);
3. Kinetic geochemical testwork - Conducting oxygen consumption tests, such as the OxCon,
to quantify acidity generation rates[18]
4. Modelling of oxidation, pollutant generation and release; and
5. Modelling of material composition.

Treatment

Oversight
In the United Kingdom, many discharges from abandoned mines are exempt from regulatory control. In
such cases the Environment Agency and Natural Resources Wales working with partners such as the Coal
Authority have provided some innovative solutions, including constructed wetland solutions such as on the
River Pelenna in the valley of the River Afan near Port Talbot and the constructed wetland next to the River
Neath at Ynysarwed.

Although abandoned underground mines produce most of the acid mine drainage, some recently mined and
reclaimed surface mines have produced ARD and have degraded local ground-water and surface-water
resources. Acidic water produced at active mines must be neutralized to achieve pH 6–9 before discharge
from a mine site to a stream is permitted.
In Canada, work to reduce the effects of acid mine drainage is concentrated under the Mine Environment
Neutral Drainage (MEND) program. Total liability from acid rock drainage is estimated to be between $2
billion and C$5 billion.[19] Over a period of eight years, MEND claims to have reduced ARD liability by
up to C$400 million, from an investment of C$17.5 million.[20]

Methods

Lime neutralization
By far, the most commonly used commercial process for treating acid mine drainage is lime (CaO)
precipitation in a high-density sludge (HDS) process. In this application, a slurry of lime is dispersed into a
tank containing acid mine drainage and recycled sludge to increase water pH to about 9. At this pH, most
toxic metals become insoluble and precipitate, aided by the presence of recycled sludge. Optionally, air may
be introduced in this tank to oxidize iron and manganese and assist in their precipitation. The resulting
slurry is directed to a sludge-settling vessel, such as a clarifier. In that vessel, clean water will overflow for
release, whereas settled metal precipitates (sludge) will be recycled to the acid mine drainage treatment tank,
with a sludge-wasting side stream. A number of variations of this process exist, as dictated by the chemistry
of ARD, its volume, and other factors.[21] Generally, the products of the HDS process also contain gypsum
(CaSO4 ) and unreacted lime, which enhance both its settleability and resistance to re-acidification and metal
mobilization. A general equation for this process is:

H2SO4 + CaO → CaSO4 + H2O

or more precisely in aqueous solution:

SO2− + 2+ 2− 2+ 2− + 2−
4 + 2 H + Ca O (aq) → Ca + SO4 (aq) + 2 H + O (aq)

Less complex variants of this process, such as simple lime neutralization, may involve no more than a lime
silo, mixing tank and settling pond. These systems are far less costly to build, but are also less efficient
(longer reaction times are required, and they produce a discharge with higher trace metal concentrations, if
present). They would be suitable for relatively small flows or less complex acid mine drainage.[22]

Calcium silicate neutralization

A calcium silicate feedstock, made from processed steel slag, can also be used to neutralize active acidity in
AMD systems by removing free hydrogen ions from the bulk solution, thereby increasing pH. As the
silicate anion captures H+ ions (raising the pH), it forms monosilicic acid (H4 SiO4 ), a neutral solute.
Monosilicic acid remains in the bulk solution to play many roles in correcting the adverse effects of acidic
conditions. In the bulk solution, the silicate anion is very active in neutralizing H+ cations in the soil
solution.[23] While its mode-of-action is quite different from limestone, the ability of calcium silicate to
neutralize acid solutions is equivalent to limestone as evidenced by its CCE value of 90–100% and its
relative neutralizing value of 98%.[24]

In the presence of heavy metals, calcium silicate reacts in a different manner than limestone. As limestone
raises the pH of the bulk solution, and if heavy metals are present, precipitation of the metal hydroxides
(with extremely low solubilities) is normally accelerated and the potential of armoring of limestone particles
increases significantly.[25] In the calcium silicate aggregate, as silicic acid species are absorbed onto the
metal surface, the development of silica layers (mono- and bi-layers) lead to the formation of colloidal
complexes with neutral or negative surface charges. These negatively charged colloids create an
electrostatic repulsion with each other (as well as with the negatively charged calcium silicate granules) and
the sequestered metal colloids are stabilized and remain in a dispersed state – effectively interrupting metal
precipitation and reducing vulnerability of the material to armoring.[23]

Carbonate neutralization
Generally, limestone or other calcareous strata that could neutralize acid are lacking or deficient at sites that
produce acidic rock drainage. Limestone chips may be introduced into sites to create a neutralizing effect.
Where limestone has been used, such as at Cwm Rheidol in mid Wales, the positive impact has been much
less than anticipated because of the creation of an insoluble calcium sulfate layer on the limestone chips,
binding the material and preventing further neutralization.

Ion exchange
Cation exchange processes have previously been investigated as a potential treatment for acid mine
drainage. The principle is that an ion exchange resin can remove potentially toxic metals (cationic resins), or
chlorides, sulfates and uranyl sulfate complexes (anionic resins) from mine water.[26] Once the
contaminants are adsorbed, the exchange sites on resins must be regenerated, which typically requires acidic
and basic reagents and generates a brine that contains the pollutants in a concentrated form. A South African
company that won the 2013 IChemE (ww.icheme.org) award for water management and supply (treating
AMD) have developed a patented ion-exchange process that treats mine effluents (and AMD)
economically.

Constructed wetlands
Constructed wetlands systems have been proposed during the 1980s to treat acid mine drainage generated
by the abandoned coal mines in Eastern Appalachia.[27] Generally, the wetlands receive near-neutral water,
after it has been neutralized by (typically) a limestone-based treatment process.[28] Metal precipitation
occurs from their oxidation at near-neutral pH, complexation with organic matter, precipitation as
carbonates or sulfides. The latter results from sediment-borne anaerobic bacteria capable of reverting sulfate
ions into sulfide ions. These sulfide ions can then bind with heavy metal ions, precipitating heavy metals out
of solution and effectively reversing the entire process.

The attractiveness of a constructed wetlands solution lies in its relative low cost. They are limited by the
metal loads they can deal with (either from high flows or metal concentrations), though current practitioners
have succeeded in developing constructed wetlands that treat high volumes (see description of Campbell
Mine constructed wetland) and/or highly acidic water (with adequate pre-treatment). Typically, the effluent
from constructed wetland receiving near-neutral water will be well-buffered at 6.5–7.0 and can readily be
discharged. Some of metal precipitates retained in sediments are unstable when exposed to oxygen (e.g.,
copper sulfide or elemental selenium), and it is very important that the wetland sediments remain largely or
permanently submerged.

An example of an effective constructed wetland is on the Afon Pelena in the River Afan valley above Port
Talbot where highly ferruginous discharges from the Whitworth mine have been successfully treated.

Precipitation of metal sulfides

Most base metals in acidic solution precipitate in contact with free sulfide, e.g. from H2 S or NaHS. Solid-
liquid separation after reaction would produce a base metal-free effluent that can be discharged or further
treated to reduce sulfate, and a metal sulfide concentrate with possible economic value.

As an alternative, several researchers have investigated the precipitation of metals using biogenic sulfide. In
this process, Sulfate-reducing bacteria oxidize organic matter using sulfate, instead of oxygen. Their
metabolic products include bicarbonate, which can neutralize water acidity, and hydrogen sulfide, which
forms highly insoluble precipitates with many toxic metals. Although promising, this process has been slow
in being adopted for a variety of technical reasons.[29]

Technologies
Many technologies exist for the treatment of AMD.[30]

Metagenomic study
With the advance of large-scale sequencing strategies, genomes of microorganisms in the acid mine
drainage community are directly sequenced from the environment. The nearly full genomic constructs
allows new understanding of the community and able to reconstruct their metabolic pathways.[31] Our
knowledge of acidophiles in acid mine drainage remains rudimentary: we know of many more species
associated with ARD than we can establish roles and functions.[32]

Microbes and drug discovery

Scientists have recently begun to explore acid mine drainage and mine reclamation sites for unique soil
bacteria capable of producing new pharmaceutical leads. Soil microbes have long been a source for
effective drugs[33] and new research, such as that conducted at the Center for Pharmaceutical Research and
Innovation, suggests these extreme environments to be an untapped source for new discovery.[34][35]

List of selected acid mine drainage sites worldwide

This list includes both mines producing acid mine drainage and river systems significantly affected by such
drainage. It is by no means complete, as worldwide, several thousands of such sites exist.

Africa
West Rand Goldfield,[36] Witwatersrand, South Africa

Europe
Avoca, County Wicklow, Ireland
Aznalcollar mine on the Guadiamar, Spain
Wheal Jane, Cornwall, England
Tinto River, Spain
Odiel River, Spain
Libiola's mine,[37] Italy
Spree River, Germany
 The Lusatian Lake District and the Central German Lake District, both the product of open pit
lignite mining, have to deal with acid mine drainage

North America
Argo Tunnel, Idaho Springs, Colorado, US
Berkeley Pit superfund site, covering the Clark Fork River and 50,000 acres (200 km2) in and
around Butte, Montana, US
The Summitville Mine in Rio Grande County, Colorado. The area has both natural and
mining-exacerbated acid drainage flowing into the Wrightman Fork, then into the Alamosa
River, which flows into the San Luis Valley
Britannia Beach, British Columbia, Canada
Clinch-Powell River system, Virginia and Tennessee, US
Iron Mountain Mine, Shasta County, California, United States
Monday Creek, Ohio, US
The Irwin Syncline in Southwestern Pennsylvania (http://amrclearinghouse.org/Sub/SCARLI
FTReports/IrwinSyncline/Section%201.pdf)
Pronto mine tailings site (https://web.archive.org/web/20050903181524/http://www.ccrs.nrca
n.gc.ca/ccrs/rd/apps/geo/mine/uranium_e.html), Elliot Lake area, Ontario, Canada
North Fork of Kentucky River (http://www.kyheadwaters.org/), Kentucky, US
Old Forge borehole, Lackawanna River, Pennsylvania. Discharges 40–100 million gallons
of acid mine drainage per day.[38]
Cheat River Watershed (http://gallery.cheat.org/AMD-Pictures) Archived (https://web.archive.
org/web/20200218135348/http://gallery.cheat.org/AMD-Pictures) 18 February 2020 at the
Wayback Machine, West Virginia, US
Copperas Brook Watershed, from the Elizabeth Mine in S. Strafford, Vermont, impacting the
Ompompanoosuc River
Davis Pyrite Mine in NW Massachusetts (http://www.umass.edu/biocomplexity/)
Hughes bore hole, Pennsylvania
Gold King Mine, Colorado, US

Oceania
Brukunga, South Australia[39]
Grasberg mine, Papua province, Indonesia[40]
McArthur River zinc mine, Northern Territory, Australia[41]
Mount Morgan Mine, Queensland, Australia[42]
Ok Tedi environmental disaster caused by Ok Tedi Mine, Ok Tedi River, Papua New
Guinea[43]
Tui mine, an abandoned mine on the western slopes of Mount Te Aroha in the Kaimai Range
of New Zealand, considered to be the most contaminated site in the country
West Coast mineral fields, Tasmania, Australia[44]

See also
Bioleaching
Environmental issues with mining
 International Mine Water Association
Passive treatment system
Uranium acid mine drainage
Environmental impact of iron ore mining

References
1. Dowding, B. & Mills, C,: Natural acid rock drainage and its impact upon background metal
concentrations (http://technology.infomine.com/enviromine/ard/Introduction/Natural.htm)
Archived (https://web.archive.org/web/20140915091444/http://technology.infomine.com/envir
omine/ard/Introduction/Natural.htm) 15 September 2014 at the Wayback Machine,
InfoMine.com (http://www.infomine.com/). Accessed 23 September 2013.
2. Ferguson, K.D. and Morin, K.A. The Prediction of Acid Rock Drainage - Lessons from the
Database. Proceedings: Second International Conference on the Abatement of Acidic
Drainage. Sept 16 to 18, 1991, Montreal, Quebec.
3. Global Acid Rock Drainage Guide (GARD Guide) (http://www.gardguide.com/index.php/Main
_Page) INAP: The International Network for Acid Prevention. Accessed 23 September 2013.
4. Gusek, J.J., Wildeman, T.R. and Conroy, K.W. 2006. Conceptual methods for recovering
metal resources from passive treatment systems. Proceedings of the 7th International
Conference on Acid Rock Drainage (ICARD), March 26–30, 2006, St. Louis MO.
5. Mielke, R.E.; Pace, D.L.; Porter, T.; Southam, G. (2003). "A critical stage in the formation of
acid mine drainage: Colonization of pyrite by Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans under pH-neutral
conditions". Geobiology. 1 (1): 81–90. Bibcode:2003Gbio....1...81M (https://ui.adsabs.harvar
d.edu/abs/2003Gbio....1...81M). doi:10.1046/j.1472-4669.2003.00005.x (https://doi.org/10.10
46%2Fj.1472-4669.2003.00005.x). S2CID 129323041 (https://api.semanticscholar.org/Corp
usID:129323041).
6. Blodau, C. (2006). "A review of acidity generation and consumption in acidic coal mine lakes
and their watersheds". Science of the Total Environment. 369 (1–3): 307–332.
Bibcode:2006ScTEn.369..307B (https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006ScTEn.369..307B).
doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2006.05.004 (https://doi.org/10.1016%2Fj.scitotenv.2006.05.004).
PMID 16806405 (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16806405).
7. [Acid Mine Drainage https://www.westech-inc.com/solutions/mining-and-minerals/acid-mine-
drainage]
8. Johnson, D. Barrie; Hallberg, Kevin B. (1 February 2005). "Acid mine drainage remediation
options: a review" (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048969704006199).
Science of the Total Environment. Bioremediation of Acid Mine Drainage: The Wheal Jane
Mine Wetlands Project. 338 (1): 3–14. Bibcode:2005ScTEn.338....3J (https://ui.adsabs.harva
rd.edu/abs/2005ScTEn.338....3J). doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2004.09.002 (https://doi.org/10.101
6%2Fj.scitotenv.2004.09.002). ISSN 0048-9697 (https://www.worldcat.org/issn/0048-9697).
PMID 15680622 (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15680622). S2CID 24245069 (https://api.s
emanticscholar.org/CorpusID:24245069).
9. Nordstrom, D.K. & Alpers, C. N.: Negative pH, efflorescent mineralogy, and consequences
for environmental restoration at the Iron Mountain Superfund site, California (http://www.pna
s.org/content/96/7/3455.full) PNAS, vol. 96 no. 7, pp 3455–3462, 30 March 1999. Retrieved
4 February 2016.
10. D. K. Nordstrom; C. N. Alpers; C. J. Ptacek; D. W. Blowes (2000). "Negative pH and
Extremely Acidic Mine Waters from Iron Mountain, California" (http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/
cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1488&context=usgsstaffpub). Environmental Science &
Technology. 34 (2): 254–258. Bibcode:2000EnST...34..254N (https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/a
bs/2000EnST...34..254N). doi:10.1021/es990646v (https://doi.org/10.1021%2Fes990646v).
S2CID 95350834 (https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:95350834).
11. Lim, Kieran F. (2006). "Negative pH Does Exist". Journal of Chemical Education. 83 (10):
1465. Bibcode:2006JChEd..83.1465L (https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006JChEd..83.14
65L). doi:10.1021/ed083p1465 (https://doi.org/10.1021%2Fed083p1465). S2CID 94970470
(https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:94970470).
12. USGS > Pennsylvania Water Science Center > Coal-Mine-Drainage Projects in
Pennsylvania (https://pa.water.usgs.gov/projects/energy/amd/index.php) Accessed 17 April
2012.
13. Sam Alcorn (2007): Professor paints a bright picture with 'yellow boy' (http://www.bucknell.ed
u/x38124.xml) Bucknell University > News, September 2007. Accessed 4 January 2012.
Archived (https://web.archive.org/web/20140714204951/http://www.bucknell.edu/x38124.xm
l) 14 July 2014 at the Wayback Machine
14. Robert S Hedin, RECOVERY OF MARKETABLE IRON OXIDE FROM MINE DRAINAGE,
2002 National Meeting of the American Society of Mining and Reclamation (http://www.hedin
env.com/pdf/Recovery%20of%20Marketable%20Iron%20Oxide%20from%20Mine%20Drain
age.pdf) Archived (https://web.archive.org/web/20081121045427/http://www.hedinenv.com/p
df/Recovery%20of%20Marketable%20Iron%20Oxide%20from%20Mine%20Drainage.pdf)
21 November 2008 at the Wayback Machine, Lexington KY, June 9–13, 2002. Published by
ASMR, 3134 Montavesta Rd., Lexington, KY 40502
15. Letterman, Raymond; Mitsch, William (1978). "Impact of Mine Drainage on a Mountain
Stream in Pennsylvania". Environmental Pollution. 17: 53–73. doi:10.1016/0013-
9327(78)90055-1 (https://doi.org/10.1016%2F0013-9327%2878%2990055-1).
16. Rasmussen, Keld; Lindegaard, Claus (1988). "Effects of Iron Compounds on
Macroinvertebrate Communities in a Danish Lowland River System". Water Research. 22
(9): 1101–1108. Bibcode:1988WatRe..22.1101R (https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1988Wat
Re..22.1101R). doi:10.1016/0043-1354(88)90004-8 (https://doi.org/10.1016%2F0043-135
4%2888%2990004-8).
17. [1] (http://www.ret.gov.au/resources/documents/lpsdp/lpsdp-acidhandbook.pdf) Archived (http
s://web.archive.org/web/20130515084247/http://www.ret.gov.au/resources/Documents/LPSD
P/LPSDP-AcidHandbook.pdf) 15 May 2013 at the Wayback Machine Department of Industry,
Tourism and Resources - Managing Acid and Metalliferous Drainage: Leading Practice
Sustainable Development Program for the Mining Industry (PDF) Australian Government
handbook, 2007: pg 28 - 40
18. P.J. Schmieder, J.R. Taylor and N. Bourgeot (2012), Oxygen Consumption Techniques to
Quantify Acidity Generation Rates, 1st International Acid and Metalliferous Drainage
Workshop in China – Beijing 2012, http://earthsystems.com.au/wp-
content/uploads/2013/05/Schmieder-et-al-2012_OxCon.pdf
19. [2] (http://www.nrcan.gc.ca/mms/canmet-mtb/mmsl-lmsm/enviro/effluents/effspecserv-e.htm)
Archived (https://web.archive.org/web/20080423224403/http://www.nrcan.gc.ca/mms/canmet
-mtb/mmsl-lmsm/enviro/effluents/effspecserv-e.htm) 23 April 2008 at the Wayback Machine
20. [3] (http://www.nrcan.gc.ca/mms/canmet-mtb/mmsl-lmsm/mend/default_e.htm) Archived (http
s://web.archive.org/web/20080604053644/http://www.nrcan.gc.ca/mms/canmet-mtb/mmsl-lm
sm/mend/default_e.htm) 4 June 2008 at the Wayback Machine
21. Zinck, J.M. and Griffith, W.F. 2000. An assessment of HDS-type lime treatment processes –
efficiency and environmental impact. In: ICARD 2000. Proceedings from the Fifth
International Conference on Acid Rock Drainage. Society for Mining, Metallurgy, and
Exploration, Inc. Vol II, 1027-1034
22. "Overview of Acid Mine Drainage Treatment with Chemicals" (https://web.archive.org/web/20
110524070234/http://www.wvu.edu/~agexten/landrec/chemtrt.htm). Archived from the
original (http://www.wvu.edu/~agexten/landrec/chemtrt.htm) on 24 May 2011. Retrieved
13 July 2009.
23. Ziemkiewicz, Paul. "The Use of Steel Slag in Acid Mine Drainage Treatment and Control" (ht
tps://web.archive.org/web/20110720064631/http://wvmdtaskforce.com/proceedings/98/98zie/
98zie.htm). Archived from the original (http://wvmdtaskforce.com/proceedings/98/98zie/98zie.
htm) on 20 July 2011. Retrieved 25 April 2011.
24. Calcium Silicon-Based Mineral CSA. Harsco Minerals.
25. Hammarstrom, Jane M.; Philip L. Sibrell; Harvey E. Belkin. "Characterization of limestone
reacted with acid-mine drainage" (https://web.archive.org/web/20130605231303/http://mine-
drainage.usgs.gov/pubs/AG_18-1705-1721.pdf) (PDF). Applied Geochemistry (18): 1710–
1714. Archived from the original (https://mine-drainage.usgs.gov/pubs/AG_18-1705-1721.pd
f) (PDF) on 5 June 2013. Retrieved 30 March 2011.
26. M. Botha, L. Bester, E. Hardwick "Removal of Uranium from Mine Water Using Ion Exchange
at Driefontein Mine"
27. André Sobolewski. "Constructed wetlands for treatment of mine drainage - Coal-generated
AMD" (https://web.archive.org/web/20150423061659/http://technology.infomine.com/envirom
ine/wetlands/coal.htm). Wetlands for the Treatment of Mine Drainage. Archived from the
original (http://technology.infomine.com/enviromine/wetlands/coal.htm) on 23 April 2015.
Retrieved 12 December 2010.
28. "Overview of Passive Systems for Treating Acid Mine Drainage" (https://web.archive.org/we
b/20090906074838/http://www.wvu.edu/~agexten/landrec/passtrt/passtrt.htm). Archived from
the original (http://www.wvu.edu/~agexten/landrec/passtrt/passtrt.htm) on 6 September 2009.
Retrieved 13 July 2009.
29. Bless, Diana; Park, Brian; Nordwick, Suzzann; Zaluski, Marek; Joyce, Helen; Hiebert,
Randy; Clavelot, Charles (1 December 2008). "Operational Lessons Learned During
Bioreactor Demonstrations for Acid Rock Drainage Treatment". Mine Water and the
Environment. 27 (4): 241–250. Bibcode:2008MWE....27..241B (https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/
abs/2008MWE....27..241B). doi:10.1007/s10230-008-0052-6 (https://doi.org/10.1007%2Fs10
230-008-0052-6). S2CID 108962729 (https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:108962729).
30. Kefeni, Kebede K.; Msagati, Titus A.M.; Mamba, Bhekie B. (2017). "Acid mine drainage:
Prevention, treatment options, and resource recovery: A review". Journal of Cleaner
Production. 151: 475–493. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.082 (https://doi.org/10.1016%2Fj.jcl
epro.2017.03.082).
31. Tyson GW, et al. (4 March 2004). "Community structure and metabolism through
reconstruction of microbial genomes from the environment". Nature. 428 (6978): 37–43.
Bibcode:2004Natur.428...37T (https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004Natur.428...37T).
doi:10.1038/nature02340 (https://doi.org/10.1038%2Fnature02340). PMID 14961025 (https://
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/14961025). S2CID 4420754 (https://api.semanticscholar.org/Corpu
sID:4420754).
32. Villegas-Plazas M, et al. (1 December 2019). "A composite taxonomical and functional
framework of microbiomes under acid mine drainage bioremediation systems". Journal of
Environmental Management. 251 (109581): 109581. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.109581 (ht
tps://doi.org/10.1016%2Fj.jenvman.2019.109581). PMID 31563048 (https://pubmed.ncbi.nl
m.nih.gov/31563048). S2CID 203592485 (https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:2035924
85).
33. Dias, D.A.; Urban, S.; Roessner, U. (2012). "A Historical Overview of Natural Products in
Drug Discovery" (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3901206). Metabolites. 2
(4): 303–336. doi:10.3390/metabo2020303 (https://doi.org/10.3390%2Fmetabo2020303).
PMC 3901206 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3901206). PMID 24957513 (h
ttps://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24957513).
34. Wang, X.; Elshahawi, S.I.; Shaaban, K.A.; Fang, L.; Ponomareva, L.V.; Zhang, Y.; Copley,
G.C.; Hower, J.C.; Zhan, C.-G.; Kharel, M.K.; Thorson, J.S. (2014). "Ruthmycin, a new
tetracyclic polyketide from Streptomyces sp. RM-4-15" (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/arti
cles/PMC3964319). Org. Lett. 16 (2): 456–459. doi:10.1021/ol4033418 (https://doi.org/10.10
21%2Fol4033418). PMC 3964319 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC396431
9). PMID 24341358 (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24341358).
35. Wang, X.; Shaaban, K.A.; Elshahawi, S.I.; Ponomareva, L.V.; Sunkara, M.; Copley, G.C.;
Hower, J.C.; Morris, A.J.; Kharel, M.K.; Thorson, J.S. (2014). "Mullinamides A and B, new
cyclopeptides produced by the Ruth Mullins coal mine fire isolate Streptomyces sp. RM-27-
46" (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4146655). J. Antibiot. 67 (8): 571–575.
doi:10.1038/ja.2014.37 (https://doi.org/10.1038%2Fja.2014.37). PMC 4146655 (https://www.
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4146655). PMID 24713874 (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.g
ov/24713874).
36. "Overview of acid mine drainage impacts in the West Rand Goldfield" (https://web.archive.or
g/web/20120313033906/http://www.fse.org.za/downloads/Decant%20of%20acid%20mine%
20drainage%20in%20the%20West.ppt). Presentation to DG of DWAF. 2 February 2009.
Archived from the original (http://www.fse.org.za/downloads/Decant%20of%20acid%20min
e%20drainage%20in%20the%20West.ppt) on 13 March 2012. Retrieved 2 July 2014.
37. IMWA Symposium 2007: Water in Mining Environments, R. Cidu & F. Frau (Eds), 27–31 May
2007, Cagliari, Italy
38. David Falchek (26 December 2012). "Old Forge borehole drains mines for 50 years" (http://th
etimes-tribune.com/news/old-forge-borehole-drains-mines-for-50-years-1.1421199). The
Scranton Times Tribune. Retrieved 18 March 2013.
39. DMITRE Minerals >...> Former Mines > Brukunga mine site (http://outernode.pir.sa.gov.au/mi
nerals/mines__and__developing_projects/former_mines/brukunga_mine_site) Archived (htt
ps://web.archive.org/web/20110402150225/http://outernode.pir.sa.gov.au/minerals/mines__a
nd__developing_projects/former_mines/brukunga_mine_site) 2 April 2011 at the Wayback
Machine Accessed 6 December 2011.
40. Jane Perlez and Raymond Bonner (2005): Below a Mountain of Wealth, a River of Waste.
The New York Times, 27 December 2005 (https://www.nytimes.com/2005/12/27/internationa
l/asia/27gold.html?pagewanted=8) Accessed 6 December 2011.
41. McArthur River Mine: Toxic waste rock ongoing problem, security bond inadequate, report
finds (http://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-12-21/mcarthur-river-mine-toxic-waste-rock-ongoing-
problem-new-report/9278922), ABC News, 21 December 2017. Retrieved 20 April 2018.
42. Farmers 'disgusted' as proposal at abandoned central Queensland gold mine canned (http://
www.abc.net.au/news/2018-03-24/central-queensland-farmers-disgusted-mining-proposal-c
anned/9581976) ABC News, 16 March 2018. Retrieved 24 March 2018.
43. Marychurch, Judith; Natalie Stoianoff (4–7 July 2006). "Blurring the Lines of Environmental
Responsibility: How Corporate and Public Governance was Circumvented in the Ok Tedi
Mining Limited Disaster" (https://web.archive.org/web/20111007034627/http://www.alta.edu.
au/pdf/conference/published_papers/marychurch_j_stoianoff_n_2006_alta_conference_pap
er_blurring_lines_of_environmental_responsibility.pdf) (PDF). Australasian Law Teachers
Association – Refereed Conference Papers. Victoria University, Melbourne, Victoria,
Australia. Archived from the original (http://www.alta.edu.au/pdf/conference/published_paper
s/marychurch_j_stoianoff_n_2006_alta_conference_paper_blurring_lines_of_environmental
_responsibility.pdf) (PDF) on 7 October 2011. Retrieved 6 December 2011.
44. [4] (http://www.mrt.tas.gov.au/pls/portal/docs/PAGE/MRT_INTERNET_PAGE_GROUP/MRT
_GEOLOGICAL_INFORMATION/MRT_GROUNDWATER/MRT_ACID_DRAINAGE/UR200
1_05_REPORT.PDF) Archived (https://web.archive.org/web/20070927163655/http://www.mr
t.tas.gov.au/pls/portal/docs/PAGE/MRT_INTERNET_PAGE_GROUP/MRT_GEOLOGICAL_I
NFORMATION/MRT_GROUNDWATER/MRT_ACID_DRAINAGE/UR2001_05_REPORT.P
DF) 27 September 2007 at the Wayback Machine Accessed 6 December 2011.

External links
Managing Acid and Metalliferous Drainage: Leading Practice Sustainable Development
Program for the Mining Industry (http://trove.nla.gov.au/work/27355420?q&versionId=425970
54) Trove: Australian Government Dept. of Industry, Tourism and Resources handbook,
2007. ISBN 0642725128 Accessed 21 May 2016.
AMRClearinghouse.org (https://web.archive.org/web/20041010190448/http://amrclearinghou
se.org/Sub/AMDbasics/ZZoverview.htm)
OrangeWaterNetwork.org (EPCAMR's Website) (https://web.archive.org/web/201107271526
24/http://www.orangewaternetwork.org/index.php?name=Content&pa=showpage&pid=50)
Assessment of treatment methods (PDF) (https://web.archive.org/web/20090419045324/htt
p://www.parliament.uk/commons/lib/research/rp99/rp99-010.pdf)
IMWA – International Mine Water Association (http://www.imwa.info/)
INAP – International Network of Acid Prevention (http://www.inap.com.au/)
INAP – Global Acid Rock Drainage Guide (http://www.gardguide.com/index.php/Main_Page)
Overview of chemical processes involved (https://web.archive.org/web/20070622204200/htt
p://www.mines.edu/fs_home/jhoran/ch126/amd.htm)
PADRE – Partnership for Acid Drainage Remediation in Europe (http://www.padre.imwa.inf
o/)
The Science of Acid Mine Drainage and Passive Treatment (https://www.dep.pa.gov/OurCo
mmonWealth/pages/Article.aspx?post=92)
USGS Mine Drainage (https://web.archive.org/web/20070908203355/http://geology.er.usgs.g
ov/eastern/environment/drainage.html)
World's Most Acidic Waters are Found Near Redding, California (pH -3.6) (https://ca.water.us
gs.gov/projects/iron_mountain/environment.html)
MiWER - Mine Water and Environment Research Centre (based in Australia) (http://www.mi
wer.org/)
Overview of acid mine drainage impacts in the West Rand Goldfield (https://web.archive.org/
web/20120313033906/http://www.fse.org.za/downloads/Decant%20of%20acid%20mine%20
drainage%20in%20the%20West.ppt)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Acid_mine_drainage&oldid=1219212962"