Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 14K views

    Medlock Order

    Uploaded by

    mark.stevens
    Medlock orders Anderson to stop filing frivolous motions

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd

    Medlock Order

    Uploaded by

    mark.stevens
    14K views110 pages
    Medlock orders Anderson to stop filing frivolous motions

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Medlock orders Anderson to stop filing frivolous motions

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf
    14K views110 pages

    Medlock Order

    Uploaded by

    mark.stevens
    Medlock orders Anderson to stop filing frivolous motions

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf
    of 110
    IN THE WASHINGTON CIRCUIT COURT COUNTY OF WASHINGTON STATE OF INDIANA STATE OF INDIANA vs CAUSE NO.; 88C01-2210-000833 DEJAUNE ANDERSON AMENDING ORDER ISSUED ON APRIL 16, 2024 COMES now the Court on its own motion and being duly advised in the premises, does now find that all filings and correspondence from the Defendant are hereby stricken. Furthermore, the Court hereby FINDS and ORDERS: 1. The Defendant, Dejaune Anderson (hereinafter, “Defendant”) has criminal actions pending in this Court. 2, The Defendant is currently charged in three counts of criminal conduct in this Court with the offenses of Murder, Neglect of a Dependent Resulting in Death, and Obstruction of Justice. The information filed in this matter alleges these offenses occurred on, about, or between dates of December 1, 2021, and April 16, 2022. 3. At the Defendant's Initial Hearing on April 2, 2024, the Defendant requested to exercise her right of self-representation, Her statements for this request are as follows: ‘THE COURT: Do you intend to hire a lawyer or is someone likely to hire a lawyer for you? DEFENDANT: Ah, I want to file a motion for self-representation. ‘THE COURT: Do you understand that if you do that, you are required to conduct yourself as a lawyer, to be able to ah, voir dire, ah, the potential jurors, to abide by the rules of evidence, to abide by the rules of procedure? DEFENDANT: I do understand, I have a Masters in History. ‘THE COURT: That doesn’t give you a law degree though. DEFENDANT: But I do understand how to read procedures... ‘THE COURT: ...alright... DEFENDANT: ...and understand the court procedures. ‘THE COURT: Alright. Just because ab, just because you represent yourself doesn’t, that doesn’t make, doesn’t ensure yourself of a good lawyer, you know? DEFENDANT: That's a personal opinion, but I understand. ‘THE COURT: Make your, make your request in writing, okay? DEFENDANT: I will. Most definitely. (See Exhibit A, Transcript of Initial Hearing, p.2 lines 3-18). 4, Following proper advisement from the Court admonishing the Defendant that she must abide by proper trial procedure, the Court granted her request to file a motion for self representation. 5. Inresponse to some erratic and non-factual statements made by the Defendant at her initial hearing, the Court also ordered Public Defender Alex Oolcy to represent the Defendant. While attempting to argue against being held without bond, the Defendant stated the following: ‘THE COURT: So, objection overruled. But I will let you make argument in regards to bond. DEFENDANT: Okay, well thank you. So that’s my, my argument is that Ihave been. under surveillance by NSA for over eight months. I also have a detail that follows me everywhere I go, from Space Force military. As into, I also contacted Indiana State, I think it was a Federal Marshal that I called to have my location tracked to pick me up. So there’s no type of extent of me running where I need this astronomical bond on my charges. ‘THE COURT: Well, that’s sort of interesting because it’s my understanding Officer Busick has been in touch with almost everyone of those agencies and they haven’t been able to identify your location until recently. So, I’m going to set your bond at no bond at this particular point, in that point time that if Space Force comes forward and tells me that they are ah, willing to monitor you, ah, we'll take up the issue of bond at a later time. (See Exhibit A, Transcript of Initial Hearing, p.7, lines 14-25). ‘THE COURT: Alright, based upon what I’ve just heard, I'm going to ask someone from the Public Defender Office be assigned to represent Ms. Anderson. Ah, if she files a, a written request and demonstrates that she has the ability ah, to understand and comprehend um, and represent herself, I may ask them to withdraw or require their, no longer require their services, But um, I think it’s appropriate that someone from the Public Defender Office be assigned at, at this particular point in time. If private ha-, counsel is hired, they can withdraw. (See Exhibit A, Transcript of Initial Hearing, p8 lines 10-16). 6. Following these statements made by the Defendant in the initial hearing, the Court reserves the right to decide whether to remove Court appointed counsel based on the Defendant's ability to display sufficient comprehension of her own representation and defense against the three causes of action pending against her in this Court. Considering the prolific number of filings submitted by the Defendant, as well as the content therein, ‘the Court finds the Defendant has not displayed sufficient comprehension for self- representation and therefore has not removed Alex Ooley as the Defendant's Court appointed counsel. Furthermore, the Court now questions the Defendant's ability to represent herself in this matter. 7. The Defendant filed a handwritten Motion for Dismissal on April 8, 2024. Since that first filing, the Defendant has filed a total of “Memorandum of Law,” nine Affidavits, nine pages of Court Correspondence, one Letter teen Motions, three documents entitled of Preservation addressed to Judge Larry Medlock, and one Appearance into this case as a pro se party on June 17, 2024, (See attached Exhibits 4-45). 8, The Defendant filed a handwritten Motion for Self-Representation on April 9, 2024, The ‘Motion cited unsubstantiated facts that are not relevant to her ease. The Defendant’s Motion for Self-Representation attempts to move the Court to allow her to represent herself based on Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure (specifically Rule 16 Discovery and Inspection) claiming matters of foreign intelligence. Defendant also asserts false claims that her Court appointed counsel, Alex Ooley, is the grandson of President Joseph R. Biden. Two statements made in this Motion reads: 9. “I relieve WASHINGTON COUNTY PUBLIC DEFENDER OFFICE of their responsibility to manage my case due to CONFLICT IN CASE. Public Defender Attorney, Alex Ooley is the grandson of Joe Biden.” “According to Rule 16(a)(1)(A) Defendant’s Oral Statement, Rule 16 (a)(1)(B) Defendant's Written or Recorded Statement, Rule 16 (2)(1)(E) Documents and Objects are foreign intelligence information that contain actions of Joe Biden.” (Soe Exhibit 6, Motion for Self-Representation). Since the filing of Defendant’s Motion for Self-Representation, the Defendant refuses to speak to or cooperate with Court appointed counsel, Alex Ooley, because of the Defendant's false belief he is related to the President of the United States. 10. Due to the Defendant’s statements in the Initial Hearing, and the allegations contained i. within the Defendant's Motion for Self-Representation, the Court found it necessary to Order Psychiatric Evaluations to be performed by Dr. Calloway and Dr. Parker. This Order was filed on April 10, 2024 and Amended on April 15, 2024. (See Exhibit 2, Amended Order for Psychiatric Evaluation). Since this time, Defendant has been compliant with only one of the ordered psychiatric evaluations. Defendant's refusal to fully comply with this Order has caused a delay in this criminal case. Defendant documents her refusal to comply with this Court Order in an affidavit entitled “Affidavit of Dr. Parker Visit 6/12/2024.” The Defendant states: “[ Princess Califia Hutan Tupak Bey II representing entity DEJAUNE ANDERSON met with Dr. Parker to decline his evaluation, Dr. Parker was in the law library. Parker refused to sign my affidavit to decline his evaluation. My evaluation of Parker is as follows, Parker exuded negative energy from his aura which placed me in defensive mode. I felt the need to protect myself and my thoughts. Parker is not a man of clear conscience. He presented himself as an expert of exploitation.” (See Exhibit 32, Affidavit of Dr. Parker Visit 6/12/2024). 12. On April, 11 2024, the Court submitted a Waiver of Attorney document to the Defendant, which she refused to sign. (See Exhibit 1, Waiver of Attomey). 13, In response to Defendant's refusal to sign the Waiver of Attorney document the Court issued another Order on April 16, 2024. This Order instructed the Defendant to “prepare her own waiver” for review of the Court. (See Exhibit 3, Order of The Court). To this date, Defendant has defied this Court Order and has not prepared any waiver for review. Instead, in Defendant's Motion to Vacate Amended Order for Psychiatric Evaluation, filed on April 22, 2024, Defendant accuses the Court of impropriety by stating, “The Court forced upon the Defendant a WAIVER OF ATTORNEY document which was pre-filed, excluded rights provided to THE DEFENDANT by the Constitution of The United States of America, IRC, & The Constitution of Indiana, displayed impropriety towards personal knowledge of THE DEFENDANT. THE DEFENDANT recognized the violations and refused to sign.” (See Exhibit 9, Motion to Vacate Amended Order for Psychiatric Evaluation), 14. The Defendant's failure to comply with this Order by the Court has caused a delay in this case and further causes the Court to question Defendant's ability to proceed pro se. 15, None of the miscellaneous documents filed by the Defendant specifically pertain to the three charges filed against her in this pending action or follow proper procedure, Defendant’s filings state frivolous and meritless claims, are largely conspiratorial in nature, and are seemingly filed for the purpose of causing delays in this case. Defendant’s documents engage in targeting, attacking, and harassing parties who are not involved in this pending action against the Defendant. Subjects of her accusations are Washington County Clerk of Courts, Stephanie Rockey, the Defendant's Court Appointed Counsel, Alex Ooley, the Washington County Detention Center, Washington Circuit Court reporter, Kellie Cari, and this Court itself. The claims in Defendant's filings include, but are not limited to, unsubstantiated allegations of criminal activity against these people and institutions. 16. In these miscellaneous filings Defendant names Washington County Clerk of Courts, Stephanie Rockey, a total of six times. She repeatedly accuses Ms. Rockey of violating Defendant’s Due Process Rights and committing crimes of fraud, perjury, and destroying documentation, Defendant’s handwritten “Emergency Motion for Discharge of Defendant,” filed on June 6, 2024 reads as follows: “1, Princess Califia Hatun Tupak Bey II representing entity, Dejaune Anderson, known as DEFENDANT am requesting grant of emergency motion to discharge of defendant on grounds of ROCKEY, clerk of court, committing fraud on court by destroying order of dismissal, order of discharge, and not notating the special judge approved for case. Indiana Supreme Court on 5/26/2024 sent orders by officer of court hand delivered. Rockey destroyed orders by having a paper shredder company come pick up all paperwork.” “Rockey willfully and knowingly violated ANDERSON IV Amendment of the USC and placed ANDERSON under enslavement refusing to release ANDERSON from custody.” (See Exhibit 20, Emergency Motion for Discharge of Defendant). In this Motion, Defendant is referring to Documentation from the Indiana Supreme Court that is nonexistent and makes allegations that cannot be proven. Of these allegations, Defendant states, “1 affirm and certify all allegations under penalty of perjury.” 17. The Defendant makes Alex Ooley, Defendant’s court appointed counsel, the subject of her handwritten filings thirteen times. She alleges in these documents that Mr. Ooley unlawfully filed motions on behalf of Defendant and claims he has been reported to the bar association. The validity of this claim is not currently known to the Court. ‘The Defendant further makes repeated claims that Mr. Ooley has placed her in harm’s way, “THE COURT is allowing Alex Ooley to openly violate IRC Rules of Professional Conduct.” 18. “The DEFEDANT provided to THE COURT on April 11, 2024 allegations of Alex Ooley having THE DEFENDANT unlawfully detained in solitary confinement for using I Amendment to the United States Constitution stating, “Donald Trump in the active commander in chief and the White House was stolen by Joe Biden,’ and not advocating for THE DEFENDANT protection from severe abuse, pain & suffering.” “The reports of severe abuse and pain & suffering include allegations against Alex Coley’s family members that are employees causing said abuse, pain & suffering. The DEFENDANT has vietim of crime rights under 18 U.S. 3771.” (See Exhibit 9, Motion to Vacate Amended Order for Psychiatric Evaluation). In Defendant's “Affidavit of Terms of Representation by Counsel,” Defendant again accuses Alex Ooley of placing her in harm’s way by suggesting he is the reason she is experiencing alleged physical ailments while incarcerated. The legitimacy of these claims are unknown to the Court. [refuse to talk to Alex Ooley without being fully presented WITHIN THE COURT due to physical damages of loss of teeth, vaginal bleeding consistently over a 30 day period, my period being on twice this month, forced to bleed through my clothes due to officers refusal to provide period pads, loss of muscle mass, and chemically burned throat from poisoning of food and contamination of air vents,” (See Exhibit 27, Affidavit of Terms of Representation by Counsel), In Defendant’s “Amend Motion for Dismissal” she states, “Alex Ooley with Matthew Harris had THE DEFENDANT placed in solitary confinement for mental health/ suicidal issues from discovering an inmate and officer sexual relationship due to inmate talking aloud about THE DEFENDANTN being placed under MK Ultra Mind Control.” Though. Defendant writes that she “affirms and certifies the truth of the allegations under the penalty of perjury,” her claims are not confirmed with any verifiable evidence and remain unfounded. (See Exhibit 14, Amend Motion for Dismissal). In Defendant’s Miscellaneous filings, Defendant makes allegations of criminal acts against this Court a total of nine times. The Defendant repeatedly accuses this Court (and its administration) of fraud, impropriety, altering Defendant’s filings, violating Defendant's rights, and harassment against the Defendant. In multiple instances, The Defendant even goes so far as to accuse Washington Circuit Court Reporter, Kellie Carl, of causing, “[D]etrimental harm to THE DEFENDANT receiving faimess and the ability to prove innocence in trial. Kellie Carl provided CBS Louisville Kentucky with a fraudulent photoshopped incarceration photo, photo from current detainment of Washington County Jail, Indiana, and details of a psychological evaluation before ‘THE DEFENDANT could be served.” (See Exhibit 10, Motion to Compel Compliance). In this same “Motion to Compel Compliance,” Defendant alleges, “THE COURT has failed to hold court officials and lawyers accountable for extrinsic fraud, THE COURT has shown impropriety towards THE DEFENDANT through bias, prejudice, harassment, negative stereotype, and extrinsic fraud.” The Defendant then threatens, “Any further continuance of this case will be directed to the Indiana Supreme Court for judicial disciplinary actions pursuant to Article IV, Section 4 of the Constitution of Indiana.” (See Exhibit 10, Motion to Compel Compliance). Defendant's “Motion of Relief Due to Violation of Constitutional Rights” Defendant requests $1.1 million in compensatory and punitive damages due to the “multiple occurrences of violations and acts of crimes by the Administrative of Washington County Circuit & Superior Courts.” Defendant states “Compensatory damages for the physical and emotional harm as a result of violating my constitutional rights are righteous and fair. Punitive damages are necessary to defer future misconduct and hold the Administrative of Washington County Circuit & Superior Courts accountable to the highest extent of the law." (See Exhibit 8, Motion of Relief Due to Violation of Constitutional Rights). ‘The Defendant later retracts this request in a Motion to Strike her own statement regarding a request for damages. The Defendant, however, does not retract any allegations of criminal activity she claims has been allowed by this Court and its administration. (See Exhibit 13, Motion to Strike). Ina ten-page handwritten Memorandum of Law, Defendant falsely accuses the Court of “Denying the Defendant an opportunity to achieve an attomey at their first appearance on April 2, 2024.” Defendant continues in her accusations stating, “Now THE COURT is in violation of criminal crimes and subject to disciplinary actions that can lead to bench being overthrowned.” (See Exhibit 23, Memorandum of Law). In an Affidavit for Change of Judge Due to Infractions and Ordinance Violations, Defendant accuses the Court of coercion. “THE COURT coerced me into agreeing to a psychological evaluation in order for my motions to be heard, even though THE COURT decided on my PRO SE MOTION.” (See Exhibit 26, Affidavit for Change of Judge Due to Infractions and Ordinance Violations). 19. The Court has not decided on Defendant’s request for self-representation and will not decide until the completion of the psychological evaluations ordered by this Court on April 16, 2024, 20. The Court finds that Defendant's multiple attacks on this Court and its administration, is a possible attempt to distract from Defendant's own criminal charges that are currently pending in this Court. The Court, however, is currently waiting for the expert opinions from psychiatrists before it determines what her motives are. Regardless, the Court will not tolerate any further effort to impede Court proceedings in this matter, 21. The Court finds the Defendant's miscellaneous filings are what the Court perceives as being founded upon conspiracy theories, and not relevant legal facts. Some of Defendants filings display what appears to be a distorted view of reality. In a June 6, 2024 filing Defendant attempted to order this Court and Washington Superior Court to produce: 1) Order of Special Judge by Indiana Supreme Court 5/26/24, 2) Order for Dismissal by Indiana Supreme Court 5/26/24. 3) Order for Release from Custody by Indiana Supreme Court 5/26/24.” (See Exhibit 21, Order to Produce). ‘The three documents listed in the Defendant’s handwritten Order to Produce do not exist, Furthermore, the Defendant repeatedly mentions facts based in conspiracy theories that are completely unrelated to her pending case. In Defendant's five page handwritten “Affidavit of My Injustice Provided by the State of Indiana.” Defendant writes: “In Salem, Indiana prisoners of war from WWII used the stolen money from the Rothschild banks to pay our American politicians, servicemen to be allowed entry into our beautiful country.” “The slaves of Caucasian decent slaughtered our great patriots, stole their names and continued on with their Constitution. The slaves joined the army against the British to kill our own patriots to move up in ranks. Instead of the British dealing with their slaves like the great Tartarians, they shipped their prisoners here. The British could not admit fault for sleeping with slaves creating spawn far evil worst than Satan wildest dreams.” “Is it my fault that | was bom to some of the greatest bloodlines? No. As I am forced to be around rapists, children molesters, incestors, drug addicts that use a title given to officers of law due to a dollar that says debt and the man who wanted.a few more dollars to invest and grow his fortune, all 1 can say is God. save America.” (See Exhibit 31, Affidavit of My Injustice). 22. In its April 16" Order, the Court stated it would not rule on any of Defendant's, motions until the completion of the two ordered Psychiatric Evaluations. The Court, now AMENDS this Order due to: a. The erratic nature of the Defendant's filings. ‘The allegations contained in Defendant's filings. ¢. The delay in this case created by the Defendant's refusal to comply with Dr. Parker’s ordered psychological evaluation. d. Defendant's failure to submit a Waiver of Attorney document that meets the Court’s standard for self-representation as ordered by this Court. 23, The Court reserves the ruling on whether the Defendant can proceed pro se until after the Court has received the competency evaluations ordered by this Court on April 16, 2024, “The trial court should not grant a defendant's request for self-representation unless it is satisfied that the defendant has the mental capacity to understand the proceedings.” Hotep-El v. State, 113 N.E.3d 795 (Ind. Ct. App. 2018). 10 24. The Court warns the Defendant that continued filing of motions that are not relevant to this action, are non-compliant with the local rules of this Court, that do not pertain to the pending action in this Court, and/ or state baseless and unmerited claims attacking this, Court and its administration will additionally inform the Court that the Defendant should not be granted the ability to proceed in this case pro se. 25. Itis the Court's duty to see that this matter is tried fairly, justly and in an orderly manner. This will not happen if the Defendant continues to file Motions, Affidavits, and any other filings with statements of facts and accusations that are irrelevant to her case, such as the. ‘ones she has been filing thus far, “It is essential to the proper administration of criminal justice that dignity, order and decorum be the hallmarks of all court proceedings in our country.” Pier » State, 446 N.B.2d 985, 988 (Ind. Ct. App. 1983). 26. The Court reminds the Defendant that if she wishes to continue to represent herself in this criminal trial, she is held to the same standard as a practicing attorney. In any future filings in this Court, Defendant must file all motions in compliance with the Indiana Rules of Trial Procedure and the local rules of this Court. 27. The Court Orders that in any future filings, Defendant must file using only her legal name according to her birth certificate as is the basis of self-representation, 28. The Court Orders that in any future filings, if the Defendant mentions her date of birth in her filings, it must only be her legal date of birth according to her birth certificate. 29. The Court Orders that in any future filings, statements of citizenship must be filed using Defendant’s legal citizenship according to her birth certificate as recognized by the United States Government. 30. The Court Orders that any future filings referencing any other cases filed by Defendant without documented evidence of the existence of those cases will be stricken. 31. The Court orders that any attempt to file any documents addressed to any Court other than Washington Circuit Court shall be stricken. This includes, but is not limited to, any documents addressed to or referencing Washington Superior Courts, Indiana Supreme Court, or any other Court not involved in this pending action. 32. The Court Orders that any future filings submitted by the Defendant must be founded on legal and substantiated facts. Any future filings that discuss Defendant's conspiracy u theories, and/or are not directly related to the charges currently pending against the Defendant will be stricken, 33, While this Court will make reasonable accommodations for self-represented litigants, it will not accept filings that are unrelated and irrelevant to the actions pending before it. All previously filed documents by Defendant since her election to proceed without counsel are hereby stricken as improper. 34, The Defendant is admonished that any future filings that do not comply with the local rules of this Court and/or Indiana Rules of Trial Procedure, that are not completely related to the above-referenced cause of action, cite baseless claims, attack individuals not related to this case, or attempts to disrupt and impede the proceedings of this Court conceming irrelevant and nonsensical subjects shall be stricken, 35. If Defendant wishes to continue to proceed in this case as a pro se litigant, Defendant must refile a new Motion for Self-Representation that is compliant with the above stated regulations as her original Motion for Self-Representation is now stricken, However, the Court will not rule on a new motion until the Ordered psychological evaluations are complete. “Right of self-representation is not license to abuse dignity of courtroom nor license not to comply with relevant rules of procedural and substantive law.” Faretta v. California, 422. U.S. 806, 95 8. Ct. 2525, 45 L. Ed. 2d 562 (1975). 36. The Court wars any further acts of defiance by the Defendant against any Order by this Court may result in Defendant being held in contempt of Court. ITIS SO ORDERED this day. Aula 2014 12 23 14 15 16 W 18 19 20 2 22 23 24 25 EXHIBIT WASHINGTON CIRCUIT COURT STATE OF INDIANA | Hits ti STATE OF INDINANA ) vs. ) CAUSENO.: 88C01-2210-F1-000833 DEIAUNE L. ANDERSON ) ) ) INITIAL HEARING APRIL 2, 2024 PAGE 1 TO PAGE 9 TARA HUNT DEJAUNE ANDERSON CHIEF PROSECUTOR DEFENDANT SALEM, INDIANA 47167 SALEM, INDIANA 47167 KELLIE CARL OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER WASHINGTON CIRCUIT COURT 1 10 1 2 13 14 15 16 7 19 20 2 22 23 24 25 THE COURT: Good afternoon everyone. You may have a seat. Mr. Seacat, would you bring out ah, Ms. Anderson? Take her to the witness stand and have her stand. Take her to the witness stand, have her stand there. Cause number 88C01-2210-F1-833, State of Indiana vs. Dejaune Anderson. Ms. Anderson, for the record would you state your full name please? DEFENDANT: Yes, I am Princess Califia Hatun Tupak Bey the Il, representing ‘the entity Dejaune Anderson. THE COURT: So you're known as Dejaune Anderson? DEFENDANT: I’m representing the entity of Dejaune Anderson. THE COURT: Your date of birth? DEFENDANT: My date of birth is February 2, 1961. ‘THE COURT: And that would make you how old? DEFENDANT: That would make me sixty three years old. THE COURT: And the last four digits of your social security number? DEFENDANT: I do not have a social security number. I have a declaration of nationality under the Washitaw Mu’ urs of the Indigenous People of the United Nations, chapter 20-, 215/93. THE COURT: What's your address? DEFENDANT: My address is 5320 Harmony Avenue, Apartment 9, North Hollywood, California, 91602. ‘THE COURT: Do you have a good contact telephone number? DEFENDANT: Um, I don’t know a contact number by heart. I believe it’s 747- 724-2323, ‘THE COURT: Are you under the influence of any drugs including alcohol today? DEFENDANT: No I’m not. a 2 4 15 16 7 18 19 20 2 22 23 24 25 THE COURT: Do you read and understand the English language? DEFENDANT: Yes! do. THE COURT: If I say something you don’t understand, will you let me know? DEFENDANT: I will, most definitely will. ‘THE COURT: Ms. Anderson, Officer Busick who’s investigated this and looked for you for the past two years and Prosecutor Hunt have charged you with three count, counts of criminal conduct. Count 1, is Murder as a Felony, would indicate that between April the 10", 2022 and April the 16", 2022, in Washington County, State of Indiana, you did knowingly or intentionally kill another human being, that being child victim number 1. Contrary to the form of the statutes in such case it’s made and provided by Indiana Code 35-42-1-1(1) and against the peace and dignity of the State of Indiana. Count 2, Neglect of a Dependent Resulting in Death, as a Level 1 Felony, would indicate between December the 1", 2021 and April the 16", 2022, in Washington County, State of Indiana, you being at late, at least 18 years of age and having the care of child victim 1, a dependent less that 14 years of age, did knowingly place said dependent ina situation that endangered the dependent’s life or health and which resulted in the death of child vietim number 1. Count 3, Obstruction of Justice as a Level 6 Felony. Would indicate that ‘between April the 10", 2022 and April the 16", 2022, in Washington County, State of Indiana, you did alter, damage or remove a record, document or thing with the intent to prevent said item from being produced or used as evidence in a legal proceeding or in an administrative or criminal investigation, contrary to the form of the statutes made in such case provided. The Murder, a Felony has a range of imprisonment from 45 years to 65 years with the advisory sentence being 55 years and up to a $10,000.00 fine. ‘The Level 1 Felony, Neglect of Dependent Resulting in Death has a range of imprisonment from 20 years to 40 years with the advisory sentence being 30 years and up to a $10,000.00 fine. And the Level 6 Felony has a range of imprisonment of no time in jail if it’s treated as misdemeanor to 2 ¥ years at the Indiana Department of Corrections 3 10 un 12 13 14 15 16 v7 18 19 20 2a 22 24 25 with the advisory sentence being 1 year and up to a $10,000.00 fine. Do you understand what you've been charged with? DEFENDANT: I do understand. THE COURT: Okay. And do you understand the potential penalties? DEFENDANT: I do. THE COURT: Do you intend to hire a lawyer or is someone likely to hire a lawyer for you? DEFENDANT: Ah, | want to file a motion for self-representation, THE COURT: Do you understand that if you do that, you are required to conduct yourself as a lawyer, to be able to ah, voir dire, ab, the potential jurors, to abide by the rules of evidence, to abide by the rules of procedure? DEFENDANT: Ido understand. I have a Masters in History. ‘THE COURT: That doesn’t give you a law degree though. DEFENDANT: But I do understand how to read procedures... ‘THE COURT: ...alright... DEFENDANT: ...and understand the court procedures. ‘THE COURT: Alright. Just because ah, just because you represent yourself doesn’t, that doesn’t make, doesn’t ensure yourself of a good lawyer, you know? you? DEFENDANT: That’s a personal opinion, but I understand. ‘THE COURT: Make your, make your request in writing, okay? DEFENDANT: I will. Most definitely. THE COURT: Ab,... DEFENDANT: ...Can you give me at least, just like five days and J can get it to THE COURT: I can certainly give you five days to do that. J think what my 4 1 12 13 14 15 16 7 18 19 20 2 22 23 24 25 intention would be, well Jet me ask you this, can you afford a lawyer? DEFENDANT: Um, it’s not that I can’t afford a lawyer, it’s that I want to do self-representation due to-, I understand the nature of my case and I understand that this is my life on he line and I, I do understand that there are things that involve my case as far as the evidence that I hold which is Q classified evidence which should be tured over to Judge Advocate General Courts immediately, if possible, Because my case involves other cases that are open currently with Judge Advocate General Courts as well as federal investigations that are open. THE COURT: Well, if the Judge Advocate General ah, approaches us, we'll address it at that point in time, DEFENDANT: Okay. THE COURT: How about I appoint you standby counsel? DEFENDANT: Ah, no thank you. THE COURT: No thank you? Alright. You make your written request. I need to advise you, you have a right to a speedy public trial by jury in this county, You have the right to face all witnesses against you, See, hear question and cross examine those witnesses. You have the right to have witnesses brought into court to testify on your behalf and at your request the court will issue subpoenas requiring those individuals to come into court to testify on your behalf or to bring evidence in. You have the right to have the State prove you guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. You have the right to remain silent. You cannot be required to give any testimony or make any statements against yourself to anyone. You do have the right to be heard in your own defense at any hearing or trial concerning the charges against you. Anything you say however, may be used against you. Do you have any questions concerning your rights? DEFENDANT: No, I do not. ‘THE COURT: Okay. Then I will set this matter for a pretrial conference on the 5 10 nu 12 13 14 15 16 7 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 day of April at 9:00 am, a trial date of the 6" day of August of this year a 8:30 am and an omnibus date of June the 15". Do you have any questions at all? DEFENDANT: No, I do not have any questions. THE COURT: Alright. If you'll sign this reappearance slip, we'll discuss the issue of bond. Ms. Hunt, what's the State’s position? MS. HUNT: Yes, Your Honor. Um, given the gravity of this case, ah, first of all I would like for you to just to take judicial notice of the probable cause affidavit that the State filed in support of these three charges which resulted in the arrest warrant, I'd also like to bring to the Judges attention that it’s almost a two year mark of officers locating um, this, at the time, un-, unidentified little boy in the woods. Um, so I would argue that the defendant has been a fugitive since that time, has ah, her identification has been made. Um, I think that raises any bond in a murder case to be something ah, of the upmost importance and should be of an amount that should be very difficult, if not impracticable for her to, to be able to afford... THE DEFENDANT: ... I object... MS. HUNT: ....or I feel she will be ah, abscond from this, this court, She’s never been from Indiana. She’s not from Washington County is my understanding. She was located in California. So on that reserve I would leave that to the court ah, and if further motion is needed on the State’s behalf, I will make that. THE COURT: Thank you, Ms. Hunt. Um, Ms. DEFENDANT: DEFENDANT: ... Yes... ‘THE COURT: ... You just made an objection. DEFENDANT: Yes. THE COURT: State the basis of your objection. 6 10 n 12 14 15 16 v7 18 19 a 22 24 25 DEFENDANT: The basis of my objection is the fact that I am not a fugitive. I have been under NSA surveillance for the past eight months and how can that qualify me as a fugitive on the run when I’ve also had a detail from Space Force that was following my every move. When I contacted... THE COURT: Alright DEFENDANT: ...the Indiana State... THE COURT: ...Now let me tell you... DEFENDANT: ...to arrest me, THE COURT: ...that is not a valid, legal objection, If you want to represent yourself, you're going to have to leam the rules evidence and the rules of procedure. Because if you conduct yourself like this and makes these types of objections, you have no chance in the world, lady. DEFENDANT: Okay. ‘THE COURT: So, objection overruled, But I will let you make argument in regards to bond. DEFENDANT: Okay, well thank you. So that’s my, my argument is that I have ‘been under surveillance by NSA for over eight months. I also have a detail that follows me everywhere I go, from Space Force military. As into, I also contacted Indiana State, I think it was a Federal Marshal that I called to have my location tracked to pick me up. So there’s.no type of extent of me running where I need this astronomical bond on my charges. THE COURT: Well, that’s sort of interesting because it's my understanding Officer Busick has been in touch with almost everyone of those agencies and they haven’t been able to identify your location until recently. So, I’m going to set your bond at no bond at this particular point, in that point time that if Space Force comes forward and tells me that they are ah, willing to monitor you, ah, we'll take up the issue of bond at a later time. 7 uw 12 13 14 15 16 7 18 19 20 2 22 23 24 25 DEFENDANT: Okay. THE COURT: Anything else? MS. HUNT: No, Your Honor. THE COURT: Alright, we'll be off record at 1:44. You can, she’s remanded to the custody of the Washington County Sheriff's Department. JAILER: Thank you, Judge. THE COURT: Your welcome. OFF RECORD BACK ON RECORD THE COURT: Alright, based upon what I've just heard, I’m going to ask someone from the Public Defender Office be assigned to represent Ms. Anderson. Ab, if she files a, a written request and demonstrates that she has the ability ah, to understand and ‘comprehend um, and represent herself, I may ask them to withdraw or require their, no longer require their services. But um, I think it’s appropriate that someone from the Public Defender Office be assigned at, at this particular point in time. If private ha-, counsel is hired, they can withdraw. We'll be-, now we'll be off record. STATE OF INDIANA. ) IN WASHINGTON CIRCUIT COURT SS: CAUSE NO.: 88C01-2210-F 1-000833, COUNTY OF WASHINGTON) COURT REPORTER’S CERTIFICATE I, Kellie Carl, Reporter of the Washington Circuit Court, Washington County, Indiana, do hereby certify that the above and forgoing is a true and complete transcript of the initial hearing of Ms. Dejaune Anderson, taken on the 2 day of April 2024. am not related to, employed by, or interested in any of the parties of this action. I further certify thatthe foregoing transcript, as prepared, is full, true, correct, and complete IN WITNESS THEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my seal this 26% day of June 2024. Official Court Reporter Washington Circuit Court Washington County, Indiana EXHIBIT IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR: WASHINGTON COUNTY. : STATE OF INDIANA. STATE OF INDIANA vs CAUSENO: secot-_2210-F 1- 0.833 Dejaune Anderson Wy, OF AY 4, ram Deyoune Anderson the Detérdaint inthis case, 2s Thave attended school and completed schadling through the _ grade/years-of college, 3: Loansead, write, and understand the English language, 4, understand that Iam entitled to have my rights explained to theand that I have the right to have any questions I may have answered:for me. : 5, Tiihderstand that have the following:rights: (a) the right toe public anid’speedy tial by Jury; (b) the right to use the power of the Court to cémpel production af-any evidence including the attendance of witnesses in my favor; (c) the right to‘see'and hear all of the ‘witnesses against me and:to question th ial; (€) the right to the essistance:of an attorney at every stage of the pidcéedirigs Against me; (e) the right to require the State to prove my guilt-beyond a reasonable doubt at tril at Which [my not be compelléd to testify -against myself; and (f) the right to appeal any conviction in this Court'to-a higher Court. 6., Lundetstand that Taye a right to:be represented in:tls case by'an attomey..1 have the right to ‘tnploy an attorney of my own choice to represent me, I ilso.understand thet if Teannot ~ -afford to employ ai atomey, te Court Will provide anrattorney for me in thisease, I also. understand that Thave a right have an attomey provided by the Court even if Tam found ‘uty of the offense charged. ‘7 Tunderstand that LWwill'be at a'digadvantageby proceeding without an attorey’since: 8, I’m not trained in the law or the rules that may apply in Coutt. '. I'm not trained in evaluating the.strengths ar weaknesses of the State's case; Tm not trained in taking witness'statoments or doing depasitions. d. Tm.not trained in picking a jury, preparing jury instructions or arguing to a'jury, ‘e, "Tit not tratied in preserving or recognizing issues for appeal. £. Pm not trained or skilled in negofiating a plea agreement to.résolve my case, 8, No person lias made any promise or suggestion of any kind to me, or within:my knowledge to anyone-else, that [ would receive any favors; special treatment, or arly other forth. of leniency if I decide not to fiave at attomey defend me in this case. This Waiver'is made and executed by me freély, knowingly, and voluntarily, pate_H=H!- 2024 ‘Defendant Signature 7 7 ENE EN EXHIBIT INTHE WASHINGTON CIRCUIT COURT Hy Zz STATE OF INDIANA 7 COUNTY OF WASHINGTON STATE‘OF INDIANA : vs CAUSE‘NO: 88C01-2210-F1-000833 DBJAUNE L. ANDERSON AMENDED DER Ft ATRI i Comes now the Court, on its own motion, hereby orders the mental evaluation of Dejaune L. Anderson to determine her. competency to stand trial and to provide an expert ‘opinion as to whether, by Indiana defiritions:pursuant to statute, to.assist in the preparation of her defétise and her compétericy to:stand trial, ‘The Court further ORDERS: 1, Dr George F, Parker, should be and is hereby appointed, to examine'tle Defendant, to assist in the preparation of her defense and her competency to:stand trial, .Dr, Parker is respectfully requested to report to the Couit the.results of the examination in writing and to testify as Court appointed psychologist in this: case. 2, Dr.Stephanie Callaway, should be and is hereby appointed, to examine the defendant to assist in the:preparation of her defense’and‘her competency 'to stand trial. Dr. Callaway is respectfully requested to report to the Court the'results of the examination in writing and to testify'as Court appointed psychologist iti this case, 3. Counsel for the parties should be and are hereby granted the right to furnish any informnétion they havé:available to the pychlatiist for use n-connéction with the examination ‘and évaluation of tlie defendant. 4, The Clerk of the Court shold be and hereby is Grdeiéd'to prepare and deliverto the psychiatrists and psychologist appointed by this Court a certified copy of this order to the addresses listed below whichshall be:thelr authorization to conduct their examination, ge'F. Parker Indiana University Department of Psychiatry TU. Health Neuroscience Center 385 West 16" Street, Suite 2600 Indianapolis,.Indiana 46202 b.Dr, Stephanie Callaway 5968 E. 71" Street, Ste. E637 Indianapolis, IN 46220: 5, The Couirt appointed phiysicians should submit their fees associated with said. evaluations to the Washington County Circuit Court Reporter in charge of the criminal: case.(s) forsubmission tothe Washington County Auditor for payment: a. Washington County Circuit Court Reporter Kellie Cari, Criminal Division 801 S: Jackson St, Ste. 103 Saleth, Indiana 47167 6, Dr. George Parker and Dr. Stephanie Callaway, the Court appointed Doctors will examine the Defendant, in person at the Washington County Detention Center, at a time to be detérmiined that is convenient with:their schedules, SO ORDERED this. past 15,2084 IN'THE WASHINGTON CIRCUIT COURT COUNTY OF WASHINGTON STATE OF INDIANA STATE OF INDIANA vs CAUSENO.; #8C01- 2210-F1-000833 ‘., _DEJAUNE ANDERSON ORDER OF THE COURT COMES now the:Court on its own request and holds a hearing on the 11 day of April 2024 regarding the Defendant's filings. The State of Indiana appears by Prosecutor Tara Hunt: The Defendant appears in custody of the Washington County Detention Center, Court Appointed Counsel, Alex Ooley also appears. ‘The defendant advises the Court that she wishes to proceed with her case’pro'se and without counsel. ‘The Court-reads the Waiver of Attomey document to the Deferidant who refuses to sign but, z acknowledges her understanding. The Court instructs the defendant to prepare her own waiver and that |. __ the Court would review it. The Court further FINDS and ORDERS: 1, That the-Court Appointed Public Defender, Alex Ooley is not released from this case. rf ‘However, at this time he shall not file any filings in this cause uriléss requested to-do so by the deféndant or first Consults with the defendant, 2. ‘The Court, at this time allows the defendant, Dejaune Anderson, to prepare her own filings and grants her request to file into this case. ‘4 3: That Dejaune-Anderson, upon being advised by the Court, that ithaé requested a psychological examination, consehts to said examination. . That the Coir, unt it has received the evaluation ftom both doctors indicating that she is competent, will not rule on‘any of her. motions/correspondence. SO-ORDERED 471612024 my Medlock, Judge ‘Washington Circuit Court OWT” — i | ' i | | STATS 0 wou a” atu ot a> QouNy op WASLNeTON FILED one No» $800\- garo-F 1 9ea8e, : abet, wee Ae _ReO\2B9105F |= “#82, APR ‘08: 2024 BOI agid ea WB asap ete Rete, tus | epson Tue disfam set | Ta g, a00¢ Ee Motion EOD DeMles Ty Panwess Cael Haron TPA Bey. see i ob Mined ont Cour Liars $0 distmes 10. B5= Het =a), Vee 2S~Ho- MUI) ALE Vey [Beton nleaLZeT oe: Ated ripest! ResurTve In pewetet 5 1.0) 36- Yul- A Alay3) A Lever le EGvOwy OBSTUCTIN OF QUSTION 5 1.0. B6-49-1- 1) A FELON MUeiee TON a lay oe Dechert» eww Sng. WASHANG TON, Sige SUELO wou oesenyy- & Oe 4 eth | i “LLe)L8) 1 Ble an neemation of 3 Coons “pe DUE eN ORT. : SAWS) stares ti Rude. FLWy changin AeSndant otto Seton, Rute Flo) is wwelid Pro “The: i _ _TQeev ben lve, > TG, DEFENDANT nevoe apyperwed Un bye “BU Poot i> INITIAL HEADING ‘on Apaial 252024 Sop “yadyokunent! 2 _whames and Mover agreed tr water of ovaearron lal indichmmset OR? nung advised of we wate Bote change, Gnd no he Doeraipadr | Quins, “The doer Chmies Wure pvvidid te The; PePENDMIT _- i Lawak \n a Kus} Eee |__ ponte re dharace lou grand jury a2 gidge, on Modul 2, 2004p | Ok \wITIRL. Hema ein wastunaton CAQOUIT COURTS OF WAsteens | | QouNT VOID A Steph wie, Cocttomy olsiregarcted Fedenad Rules | | th bene porrmouey sek fous wy VS Supmene Court ond vetsced | TWt Dare WOANTS ogni +O Due Paces plane conned wernin : - 2. ; of Indaning (MANU 908 coil isla amg nm i \pekeoin aoe QS) 202) a Miata \H, oa}. ip Bie 2 caption | | Sushssshey tae oomsaucd ~ a ee ! a pada ee ‘ Raia WOW ney fro) 2, 209, “THe “Cree wast Mas, \-€0\0), : Winks aeecked ow he nse d Skates of Tu QConcrguaon “Me DEP NIDAMT Was o Horwrnntaron Comnercare Wor is orate wh OC # SA Neheval frvemves and Cenacle’ Febininvehrndion, 80 Arlt Rand < Caley, Powle. MD2bEO LSA “Ww. nohuralranhn tuaontes es po to Te, Demew RST: bNtensie Samus. ws Witt oe Boone 0s ia stat . : pe _ PGE 806 a | EXHIBIT | STE. De antoabe mer ear eoMerT NTO Was Wig TON . + CRUSE WoO. GAO\— 210-7 ]- 0082 . 7 oe ; ee ‘APR: OB 2024 ‘ 7 Ee eee Siete W Rested, CLERK “YRCO\ = AAO NS re 8:56am SEE o 203) Motion! foe. SuMnnEY " JungenenrT \ THe. BeteNOMEL Qanicesseouiern Wao TpHy Bete ee [ ee MONA “thee ort clear Od CMUSE cue Ry Aslam. nae |AWe veteran's EST Amendment tos Skedvarur Va Coaweny! gerard | L bbRanse of AWAY can wWheamnoxymn ov Dordt, 29, ae. 2292 against. ! THe Of cnAnT aS erred in re memorandum of law evecented i ees abee ore NO Anus We DeFend ANT Pt Rhee oe : EXHIBIT STATE OF INDIAWA WW Te WReHINderTON Gownty oF WASHING TON: oe QoMT CoueTS ED CRMKEND: IRUO\ = AAO -F 1- DOORS, STATE OF INDIANA FiU Heo|- Jar0-F}-F39, $ep\— 220 Ne per 09 1h ANPERS P CLERK + ee . patra OS pax) 4, 200% : W MTN Fer SELE REDPESENTATION TL, PeweesS CRUEL ANTON TOPAL BEIT, representing DAAONT LANDLORD), aN NETYing He COMET of Sate Senreckion.. Te veleve- Wastiwentn COUNTY PUBLIC TEFENDER OFFICE oF YN aCeponslorl try fV MONE MY Case due Ad CONFLICT IN CASE. Puldle Defender AHorney > Alex Dolcy 1s Pre grandson of dre Biden Agcorckuig, ta Rule Me (a€t) (A) Defendarctts Oe ment, Rule tle (a)(IP) Deferdarctis Wetter be Qecmdcd Starment; Rue Ik (a) CLE) Daeuments and Obyecks are Tcagn inlelhasnee (ntaemodion Yak venta achons of Woe Biden as used in Re ele 6 (e> (D) Lit) Foreign eta Infowmachon’ peas” (@) urfolivucton , Wines. OO no} ek eondewns o Undead Sides peicon, Har verates totus alaulthy oF Hee Wika 'gtakes Pwket ajeuns — + aokwl o@polenndl attract o2 oY ' one wssh\cneks oF @- veg pewer orks 5 eStUOecroIe, oF UeNNR A 4 VIEW by] O POrOIGN poreR. 02 ras Anti y OF # clandecrwe inieliigunce ackwvures \oy aun ee seduce on rake of a Renugh pele, 80 A AS uniss 0 [b) In om, Weted a WE UNCLES a UGA SEAS PerSorts WOM TOK Loran Power oP way Povergn render y velares —~ othe pakraval dekonge BY IAS Seuaruky opts Unused Seared 5 0% + WAr crmauck ot Wee feverqn aheaues OF Qe Wed Grades. Airy motions a-fulngs’ CLAS OnrHhe WAMAIE OF HAS ankthy DOANE L- ANpuesoN toy Wetton dounry PUBLC DEtENDAt PERCE Ore WA ard 01d. Puldle Defercod. Pavone » Alar Coley was Hekwed ot-baammahen Open & 2004 ak UM QWs yds each end (oMGINZD. PUBLIC EAMMUNNCATIONS PrVided ly Washingron Coury, adi varng IPOD 434 35 + Veysien ale-4 under wegisterea -tecr, WUINDER, BVA-HOHt-AHAS fr BlA— Set — S848 thar was Cunahed An PRINCESS CAL SARTON) ATORAK BES POPreHMS enrrmg PRE (OF 2 Ded RONT LU AMDTREON on Apeid 3, goa Pace Ap Race copryence, Fam requesting tonkaot imtoomaren fue PRoscatoe @NUdGE Ae Be Uretded “Un BWA COersamens , CHRRCSpoaeNce Un VEQaArAs te AROSE NO. S8GhSi-sa10 - F\- 000933 GeCDI~ JaL0 ~ FI- 933, ¥BEOIM BDO. and +o Oe PHESVh Ok aN QVDEES chamoet MecTAs as. Uretakes to me eyerasing te IO Amendincr toaine Und States Constr, “TL, PRINCESS CALAFIA AATON TORRY BAIS, often OINA COMME Hine At OF Hat Beqamrons under fhe Geral of heey: Clipe Haden, Teypelt Bey "jeu tect s— DEranvAnT PhaE a. OF & STATE OF (NOANP WN) THE WasttingroN Counrry, DE WASHIN EP TON QROMT, LOWET “EXHIBIT ANSE No. Beeo\- AALO- F1-000G RCO \- Bn10-F1-%O 3.4 rw ielee las FILED gee l- VO Vs APR 10-2004 Papen 105 2024 Sera Het, Dwaune L Anicreoson eta ait MoTON “To VRCATE POMUNISTQATWE EVENT TE, Princess CRIA HPTON ToPRY BEY IE, representing SOMUNE Desnune L-ANDEASON in ny, AS TAS DEFENDANT, aM ee KeQuesrng a mokion -1y yacare Gules KNOT CORRES CoNWENCE * NEA agamer Peo Se MOTION om Apal A) 30D4 The ADMINISTER RVENT CORRESPONDENCE seared Summary Wy ckenteal P20 SE MOTION 0S shu ts Coventry veevesunicad wy eounsed . Pvo Se MOKTENS SVM nor oe Faved Gand Hheretore aye Wok aeceored The AAMIMarZaWe oF WASHINGTON COUNTY OWeT SUPER0e COURTS swnowin aS THE ADMIN, 1s Willing and Mowingly Comoiting Pryor eer \.U. BS t- 21 eens, italy sbocentoes, 08 Ry arena rower Winey We Ades Vidr Oe uevd kD oe Temes, eQuarty) oe peut Od Shu, Wal reed AS OHNARANSO Dipresory yr oy \awl 0 Sineck UALS HLS, OD MpeISOeN NWA mae qhan Awe Zaye o@ won, WHS Wa Sethon 135. applieade wheter Ae aiaroment on “subbsonprim 5 nade Wun oe Wetnows uo Uniied GUS slay Vinloay Te Late NoAWT's TF Frovendimerse 1d ete Unreal SrakeS Consrurukin Medes Wwe DUE Proess Clase’s WCU Stakes “hak 00 Bersen DNA lol deprweel of (Ge sWNoearYy, o@ propedny Wi UE Erecess Glad. een “fae ndsnanas ave tinted + Sipe re Ling s » WN pyoleckunrs Cnn Con OL Guna Ardsanunae eaane TE OQORAYY a oe nok Qudge Latin, Medlock. Qruiied Ye DEFENDANT Pao Se OPEN! COURT LOTION and WAS Freie COWS to fe Ried vy He nA c? Hue day on Apil 4 200K. TRE DEPENDANT Pyvowedl duweekions as ursimucted . 7 sued ecdbace: wt wala Cee aunadoon eS WWASEINGTION COUN AG WERENDER Ore on LE RD DEPENDINT chovse “nse pecceal wating __ Phew oF 2, ween P20 Se until, Judge Lov Male med “THE DEFENDANT TS Open ewe noken por Palle, H+ Moker op Suppor A€ladowss Lo) Fata onc contend of 0 nore « Theretove, te AON Were ap qetepr PLO SE RETION toy Hae DERODINT Aled on Apu 4,200 HapabIONNL un goed Pautin oe loowre oy Aratiae SE Gout @ of-ire Vsukecl Dates Cowercticku , commen: talented +0 as WY. Supyemincy chase ponsiugpon Cory, Pulo\ies Dekender Kick briey stanown a Mex Oateys Deled wortaneudiag toy procecdy jp Te COWHTS en Apid Vy WOY on Sverath, ankurwy UZSAOOL L ABZETE PNOZEsDd. ALEX Gorey was Rwed en Apo J, Woy ake 44H” usuyy A cemRed denice by Lomened PUsre- CONMMUNCRTLENS, Crude Aeviee [Po — 13436 + Versvon Alo 4 ving pene nndoc. Bid leo -FUAS: Www boy wosungron Coty Yard, Lneuan re aemntiemed plume Niner Pot ley Boley ere in Beg, rey Ooley Ws been veperied to Indiane Srake 2SOGEM. Ey coretusam , Sage Larry, Wealou eden Supertedtes AINE BEUMS OR ELE PLO SE BOTAN oy Hee DECENDANT Aired ow Prpost 4 , 2094 bby he ADMIN. “The ADMINN 1S on a Séood Soave OF um paging -o utungy on Ae DEFEVDANT “SE Prinendiweny +d | whe Uruted Brees Geraniol “uveluda ARE “Dw Prncess Cranse. “he DEPENDANT & requesting “that the MOTION “TO VRCAVE- WSCA TE EVENT aporued immediately ak Ye QUOGe ete eR Gonyienance’. Te DEFENDANT is request JUPAE LAREN medtooes ve expedite: ANSWER wr pyncecounys ovy Motion’ 0& PISNISSAA— & MoTLN OF SUMMKEY OUDGEMANT wathund Aadays Haw Wore Wed, vedgeckwwely, eH Pro B04. Prrewerring The DEFENDANT VeQnest wvimedlakeAy and etteckirely Wi cheRew inisconduick aun CRAM aes wuhrngy ana Venom pursued lay tie dminisr¥oao 9® woshunsfren Coury, cue T & Sveemoa, WETS , roy olor eM OF GLEMed \ueir aA propert. oy we Cowie. YUAKE Lary Medloders \ourd oy Protcde: “SL Clause oftre Umut Qrares Comer , tprirmanly vekeoaeel 4D OS Yne Srp chauesen Ur stakes Hast venice ade Unnon Twe oumrowehy 6 Tt Snare, kanes» SWUM FANE Suuperne/ Law! othe Land 4 anna the, Qusiges tn tareay Soke? SAIN Woe: oon) ANU CHAAR ny “TRE, COSTA 6. LAWS BF CUNY Shake FOAL UAE. yotIAs Keandings PRINCESS CAMAFIA HATUN TOPAR BEY A AAT eM acd comes ore areuatr 0& 4 AAcAONS Woe. SNE Ost Te “THE DEFENDANT fac 2 oe a STR OF inxs XAT NO THe WReteine pon! Could be Vo NeToN 1 8 Gieeut tower: NSE NO. S6C0\- Salo-F1~ n0g¢3), STRTE OF planer SCO ~ gaio- F\-¥aa, ve APR 10 2024 BCOI- aap DESRUNS L-INIDERSON msniaroloneuTaabtnoncoure — Apt 10 2.004P Et ee WOT OF RENEE DET VIELEMON oF CONSTTSTLONLS Qieqrts Penverss Cue HLYTUN “TUPRKD "BEYSE wupreserihong aie entulrg, DaLAUNE-L-ANOLCEN . Vanni 08 4Ke DEPENDANT, proves “IMS COURT foo Wehiee due re vivlamen ©> Covemmutunal roars - The moeripie OC turers: oPNiplahens Ona Acks of eames Wy HX AdimuMstRare oe eae Counry CMC B SUREESL COUILTS Vo corona, ty gaye easier Sehauge eerie wm WTO) Bed DiEMIGSAL, MEMO ZaNDUM OF LAW, Motion) WAM fre QUPGEMONT x orev: even wate tu cia Rie and uitane velnestemumn te ome. sn hack aes fare wnt GOTT Say 8 to dhe sled tees Onctdhon Vndigisy peet hehe rn Foun Mowed Set Gru wludh peti oruad and unos “BSL Atnandauave 40 ne raed nee ‘Stonm \. the, wyton County CREUT ] WVPEROL CHUZTS Farrure 4p pvovicl’ eee insitutes neg ligeliod enacbelvienste, uidh Pereivoe omy we Te tack’ CHAU, ceiinncheare sires OWE ND” QenMne disputes Anansi Os +0 drip mated uct eon to whe yudatant oP my eonatthunendl vWigine. Compensakma, damage forse Prystedd ondemonmalhenm

    You might also like

    pFad - Phonifier reborn

    Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

    Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


    Alternative Proxies:

    Alternative Proxy

    pFad Proxy

    pFad v3 Proxy

    pFad v4 Proxy