Annexure J

National University of Sciences & Technology

School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science
Department of Software Engineering

Rubric for Semester Project Report

Exemplary ,4 Accomplished, 3 Developing, 2 Beginning, 1
Wt.
Criteria Yes Yes, but No, but No

 Project very well designed and executed.  Project adequately  Project not fully  Misinterpreted
Conceptual framework clear and concise designed/evidence of understood /conceptual project/Project design
++ Goals of the project and report clearly conceptual framework framework for the components not stated
stated and thoroughly carried out + All project components project missing. -- No use of technical terms
++ Excellent understanding and use of completed - Little use of technical -- Misuse of
Completeness 10%
technical terms + Appropriate use of terms/jargon obscures theories/ideas/concepts
++ Exceptional balance between theory technical terms arguments -- Late without permission
and observation and creative application + Clear understanding of - Little discussion of relevant
theory and application to theory/concepts
the project
 Good organization; points are logically  Organized; points are  Some organization; points  Poorly organized; no
ordered; sharp sense of beginning and end somewhat jumpy; sense of jump around; beginning logical progression;
Organization 10%
beginning and ending and ending are unclear beginning and ending
are vague
 Supporting details specific to subject  Some details are non-  Details are somewhat  Unable to find specific
Quality of
25% supporting to the subject sketchy. Do not support details
Information topic
Grammar,  No errors  Only one or two errors  More than two errors  Numerous errors
Usage, Spell, 25% distract from
Mechanics understanding

 Vocabulary is varied; supporting details vivid  Vocabulary is varied;  Vocabulary is  Basic vocabulary; needs
Interest Level 10% supporting details useful unimaginative; details lack descriptive words
“color”
 Typed; clean; neatly bound in a report  Legible writing, well-formed  Legible writing, some ill-  Illegible writing; loose
cover; illustrations provided characters; clean and neatly formed letters, print too pages
Neatness 10%
bound in a report cover small or too large; papers
stapled together
 Report on time  Report one class period late  Report two class periods  Report more than one
Timeliness 10%
late week late
 National University of Sciences & Technology
School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science
Department of Software Engineering

Project Report Evaluation Form

Course Code: ____________________________________ Course Title:__________________________________________

Project Title __________________________________________________________________________

Student Names __________________________________________________________________________

Score=
Grade
S.No Rubric Weight (Grade *
(1-4)
Weight)
R1 Completeness 1
R2 Organization 1
R3 Quality of Information 2.5
R4 Grammar, Usage, Mechanics, Spelling 2.5
R5 Interest Level 1
R6 Neatness 1
R7 Timeliness 1
Obtained
Maximum Marks 40 Marks

Evaluator
Name _________________________________________________

Signature _________________________________________________
 National University of Sciences & Technology
School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science
Department of Software Engineering

Oral Presentation Rubric

Criteria 0 1 2 3 4
R1 Student has no Student does not Student is Student has competent Student has presented
Subject Knowledge knowledge of both have grasp of uncomfortable with knowledge and is at ease full knowledge of both
problem and information; student information and is able with information. Can problem and solution.
solution. Cannot cannot answer to answer only answer questions but Answers to questions
answer basic questions about rudimentary questions fails to elaborate. are strengthen by
questions. subject rationalization and
explanation
R2 Student is clueless Information is Information articulated Information articulated Information articulated
Organization and about the content arranged in confused clearly but it is difficult to clearly and the flow is clearly and is organized
Content of of his presentation. and unstructured way. follow the presentation. reasonable in a structured way
Presentation with logical flow
Key points are not All key points are covered All key points are between parts.
covered. The contents but no use of charts, covered but limited use
are hard to understand graphs, figures etc., to of charts, graphs, figures All key points are
and interpret. explain salient points. etc., to explain salient covered. Enhances
points. presentation and keeps
interest by effective
use of charts, graphs,
figures etc., to explain
salient points.
R3 Presentation was Holds no eye Displays minimal eye Consistent use of Holds attention of
Delivery & not clear at all. contact with contact with direct eye contact entire audience
Presentation Skills Language was not audience, as entire audience, while with audience, but with the use of
appropriate report is read from reading mostly from still returns to notes direct eye contact,
notes the notes seldom looking at
Speaks with satisfactory notes
Speaks in low Speaks in uneven variation of volume
volume and/ or volume with little or no and inflection Speaks with
monotonous tone, inflection fluctuation in volume
which causes and inflection to
audience to maintain audience
 disengage interest and
R4 The project could Some of the major Major features of Most features of the The project is
Completeness of not be completed. features are the project are project were completed in the
Project, complete but the completed. completed and timely manner with all
Timeline timeline for project However, the timeline as defined in features implemented
was not followed. timeline was not the proposal was according to the
followed followed timeline defined in
project proposal.
R5 The student never Student reported Student had few Student held Student held
Professional ethical reported to his occasionally to meetings. More regular meetings regular meetings
values supervisor his supervisor. are required. with his supervisor. with his supervisors
The student did Some time he and committee
not follow the came prepared, members. He
timeline. other times he reported his
was not prepared. progress regularly
R6 Only one member did Only one member Not all members All members All members
Team Work all the work. did all the work. contributed to the contributed to the contributed to the
Other members project. Work project. Cooperation project.
Conflicts between the could not answer division is not between group
group members were basic questions mentioned. members was Any conflicts within
clearly visible. about the project. reasonable. the group members
Work division is were amicably
mentioned resolved.
Work division is
clearly mentioned.
 National University of Sciences & Technology
School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science
Department of Software Engineering

Presentation Evaluation Form

Course Code: ____________________________________ Course Title:__________________________________________

Presentation Title __________________________________________________________________________

Student Names __________________________________________________________________________

Score=
Grade
S.No Rubric Weight (Grade *
(1-4)
Weight)
R1 Subject Knowledge 2
R2 Organization and Content of Presentation 1.5
R3 Delivery & Presentation Skills 1
R4 Completeness of Project, Timeline 1.5
R5 Professional ethical values 1
R6 Team Work 1
Obtained
Maximum Marks 24 Marks

Evaluator
Name _________________________________________________

Signature _________________________________________________