TM 5-856-5

TM
DESIGN OF STRUCTURES TO
RESIST ATOMIC
5-856-5
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY TECHNICAL MANUAL
WEAPONS
DESIGN OF STRUCTURES TO RESIST
THE EFFECTS OF ATOMIC
WEAPONS-
SINGLE-STORY FRAME BUILDING

This copy is a reprint of former EM 1 1 10-345-417, 15 January 1958, including change 1. Redesignated
TM
5-856-5 by
DA
Cir 310-28, 17 March 1965.
HEADQUARTERS,
TAGO
5479A
DEPARTMENT
J
OF
THE
U L Y
9 6 5
Au*
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY

WASHINGTON,
for the use of
all
D.C., 30 July 1965
concerned.
published
;
of the the Secretary
Army:
HAROLD
K. JOHNSON, United States Army, General, Chief of Staff.
Manuals
U. S.
Corps of Engineers Army
EM 1110-345-417 15 Jan 58
ENGINEERING AND DESIGN

DESIGN OF STRUCTURES TO RESIST THE EFFECTS OF ATOMIC WEAPONS
SINGLE-STORY FRAME BUILDINGS

TABLE OF CONTEND
Paragraph
Page
IMRODUCTION
7-01
7-02
PURPOSE
AW
SCOPE
1 1 2 2
REFERENCES a* References to Material in Otlier Manuals of This Series b. List of Symbols
7-03
RESCISSIONS
2 2
3
7-04
7-05 7-06
GENERAL
BEHAVIOR OF SINGLE-STORY FRAMES
SHEAR
MD
MOMENT RESISTANCE OF COLUMNS
k
6
7-07
7-08
THE EFFECT OF DIRECT STRESS ON COHJMN RESISTANCE

OEE EFFECT OF GIRDER FLEXIBILITY ON COLUMN RESISTANCE
7-09
7-10 7-11 7-12
7-13
7-llj.
EFFECT OF LATERAL DEFLECTION ON COHJMN RESISTANCE

DESIGN OF COIUMNS
DESIGN OF ROOF GIRDERS
FRAMES WITH LATERAL LOADS ON THE COIUMNS
LOADS ON FRAME STRUCTURES
9
9
11
13 13
FRAMING ARRANGEMENTS
^
I1 *
7-15
7-16
PRmTMimw
DESIGN METHODS
NUMERICAL INTEQÂTION ANALYSIS

SUMMARY OF DESIGN EXAMPLES
15 16
16
7-17
7-18
GENERAL
DESIGN PROCEDURE
IX3AD
7-19 7-20
18
a. bc.
d. e.
DETERMINATION Incident Overpressure vs Time Curve Front Face Overpressure vs Time Curve Rear Face Overpressure vs Time Curve Net lateral Overpressure vs Time Curve Average Roof Overpressure
19 19 19 25 25 25
EM
15 Jan 58
paragraph
Bage
7-21
DESION OF HALL SLAB a Design Loading

"b.
c. d. e.
f.
g.
h.
i.
Dynamic Design. Factors First Trial - Actual Properties First Trial - Equivalent System Properties Work Done v.s Energy Absorption Capacity Preliminary Design for Bond Stress Determination of Maximum Deflection and Dynamic Reactions "by Numerical Integration Shear and Bond Strength Summary
r| 2^ 27 27 28 28
29 32 22
33 33
314.
7-22
DESIGff OF ROOF SLAB a. loading
be
c. d. e.
f
g. h.
i.
j
.
k.
1.
Dynamic Design Factors First Trial - Actual Properties First Trial - Equivalent System Properties Work Done vs Energy Absorption Capacity Second Trial - Actual Properties Second Trial - Equivalent System Properties Work Done vs Energy Absorption Capacity Preliminary Design for Bond Stress Determination of fcfeocimum Deflection and Dynamic Reactions by Numerical Integration Shear Strength and Bond Stress Summary
Loading Dynamic Design Factors First Trial - Actual Properties First Trial - Equivalent System Properties Work Done vs Energy Absorption Capacity Second Trial - Actual Properties Second Trial - Equivalent System Properties Work Done vs Energy Absorption Capacity Preliminary Design for Shear Stress Determination of Maximum Deflection and Dynamic Reactions by Numerical Integration Shear Stress Check Check Proportions for Local Buckling
35 36 36 36 37 37 38
38
kO
^-1
7-23
DESIGN OF ROOF PURLINS

a.
*H ^1
50 50 51 51 52 52 53 53
53 56 56
b.
Co d. e.
g.
h.
i.
j.
k.
1.
7-2*J-
raTCLTMTMARy DESIGN OF COLUMNS

a.
"b.
c. d.
e.
f.
g.
Design Loading Mass Computation First Trial - Actual Properties First Trial - Work Done vs Energy Absorption Capacity Second Trial - Actual Properties Second Trial - Work Done vs Energy Absorption Capacity Third Trial - Actual Properties
II
57 57 5o
->o
59
^0 bO 61
ft
Baragraph
h.
i.
j
EM 1110-345-la7 15 Jan 58
Third Tra.l - ork Done vs Energy Absorption Capacity Shear Stress Check of 10 ^77 Slenderness Criterion for Beam Columns
6l 62 62
63 63 64 64 66 66 67 67 67
7-25
DESIGN OF ROOF GIRDER a .Loading b. Elastic Range Dynamic Design Factors c. Mass Computation d. First Trial - Actual Properties e. First !Erial - Equivalent Properties f Second Ofrial - Actual Properties Second Irial - Equivalent Properties g. li. Preliminary Design for Shear Stress i. Determination of Maximum Deflection and Dynamic Reactions "by Numerical Integration Shear Stress Check j. k. Check Proportions of 36 ^160 for Local Buckling
.
67 68
69
69 69 70
70 70 71
73
75 75 75 83
8^-
7-26
FINAL DESIGN OF COUJMN a. Mass Computation b. Co lump Properties c. Column Interaction Design Data d. Effect of Girder Flexibility e. Loading f Computation of Deflection of Frame by Numerical Integration
.
7-27
FOUKDATION DESIGN a* General b. Loads c* Preliminary Sizes of Members d. Preliminary Depth of Foundation e. Overturning Moment f Combined Axial load and Overturning Moment go Design of Foundation Members ho Dynamic Foundation Design i. Polar Moment of Inertia I p Ground Foundation Interaction j. k Dynamic Analysis 1. Design of Foundation Members
.
86 87 89 93 95
95 9&
99
NUMERICAL EXAMPLE^ DESIGN OF A ONE-STORY STEEL FRAME BUILDING - EIASTIC BEHAVIOR

7-28
7-29
GENERAL
1C*
105
106
DESIGN PROCEDURE
LOAD DETEEMINATIQN
a.
7-30
7-31
DESIGN OF WALL 8MB Design Loading

III
112 112
EM 1110-3^5-417 15 Jan 58
Paragraph.
b.
c.
Page
Elastic Range Dynamic Design Factors First Trial - Actual Properties First Trial - Equivalent Properties First Trial - Available Resistance vs Required Resistance Preliminary Design for Bond Stress Determination of Maximum Deflection and Dynamic Reactions by Numerical Integration Shear Strength and Bond Stress Summary
112 112
113
d. e.
f.
g.
113 11^ Ilk 115 116

Il6 117 117 117 118
h.
i.
7-32
DESIGN OF ROOF SLAB a. Design loading b. Elastic Range Dynamic Design Factors c. First Trial - Actual Properties d. First Trial - Equivalent Properties e. First Trial - Available Resistance vs Required Resistance f, Preliminary Design for Bond Stress Determination of Maximum Deflection and Dynamic g. Reactions by Numerical Integration h. Shear Strength and Bond Stress i. Summary
118 118
118 120 120
7-33
DESIGN OF ROOF PURLINS a. loading b. Dynamic Design Factors c. First Trial - Actual Properties d First Trial - Equivalent Properties First Trial - Available Resistance vs Required e. Resistance f* Preliminary Design for Shear Stress Determination of Maximum Deflection and Dynamic g. Reactions by Numerical Integration h. Shear Stress Check Check Proportions for Local Buckling i.
ERELTMINARI DESIGN OF COLUMNS Design Loading b. Mass Computation c. First Trial - Actual Properties First Trial - Determination of D.L.F. d. e. Shear Stress Check of 12 ^120 f Slenderness Criterion for Beam - Columns
a*
.
120 121 126 128 128

129 129 129 130 131
7-34
131 132 132 133 133
7-35
GIRDER DESIGN Determination of Maximum Deflection by Numerical Integration b. Shear Stress Check c. Check Proportions of 36 ^150 for Local Buckling
a.
135
135 137 137
IV
<
1M
15 Jan 58
P&ragraph
7-36
pê
FINAL DESIGN OF COEQMN a. Mass Confutation "b. Column Properties c. Column Interaction Design Data cL Effect of Girder Flexibility e. Loading f . Conrputation of Deflection of Frame Integration Shear Stress Check g.
139 139 139 139
il|Q
i4i
"by
Numerical
14.3
NUMERICAL EXAMPLE, DESHM OF A OHE-STQRT BEBIFCBCED-COIGRETE FRAME BUILDUP, PIAST1C DEFORMAECON PERMITTED
7-37
7-38
GENERAL
DESIGN H*OCEDURE
K>AD DETERMIMATIOlf
ll*6
7-39
DESIGN OF WAIi SLAB Design Loading ID. Itynamic Design Factors c. First Trial - Actual Properties d. First Trial - Equivalent System Properties e. First Trial - Work Done vs Energy Absorption Capacity f . Preliminary Design for Bond Stress Determination of Maximum Deflection and Dynamic g. Reactions by Numerical Integration h. Shear and Bond Strength i. Summary
a.
152 152 152 153
155 156 158 159
DESIGN OF ROOF SLAB a. Design Loading "b. Dynamic Design Factors c. First Trial - Actual Properties First Trial - Equivalent System Properties d. eWork Done vs Energy Absorption Capacity f Second Trial - Actual Properties Second Trial - Equivalent System Properties g tu Work Done vs Energy Absorption Capacity i. Preliminary Design for Bond Stress Determination of Maximum Deflection and j. Reactions by Numerical Integration k. Shear Strength and Bond Stress 1. Summary
7 Jf2
159 159 160 162 163 163
165
165 168 169
mZZmUStKHX COIZMN DESIGN

a.
"b.
c. d.
Design Loading Mass Computation First Trial - Actual Properties First Trial - Work Done vs Energy Absorption Capacity
169 170 170 170
Jan. 58
7-43
Second Trial - Actual Properties Second Trial - Work Done vs Energy Absorption Capacity DESIGN OF HOOF GIRDER a. loading tu Elastic Range Dynamic Design Factors c. Mass Computation d. First Trial - Actual Properties e. Second Trial - Actual Properties f. Preliminary Design for Bond Stress 8Determination of Maximum Deflection and Dynamic Reactions by Numerical Integration t. Shear and Bond Strength i Summar
e.
f.
^QO tso *
Xr
I :>*
-
"v*
7-44
FINAL DESIGN OF COIUMN a. Mass Computation "bo Column Properties c. Effect of Girder Flexibility
d. e.
-*.
*r
*^ =
f.
Loading Numerical Integration Computation to Determine Column Adequacy Shear and Bond Stress
^
-_> l3c
~"~ =
NUMERICAL EXAMPLE^ DESIGN OF A ONE-STORY REINFORCED-CONCRETE FRAME BUILDING- -ELASTIC AND EIASTO-PIASTIC BEHAVIOR
7-45
7-46
GENERAL
DESIGN PROCEDURE
LOAD DETEEIMINATION
l3
191
7-47 7-48
19
DESIGN OF WALL SLAB a. Design loading "b. Dynamic Design Factors c. First Trial - Actual Properties d* First Trial - Equivalent System Properties First Trial-Work Done vs Energy Absorption Capacity e. f Second Trial - Actual Properties Second Trial - Equivalent System Properties g. h. Work Done vs Energy Absorption Capacity i. Preliminary Design for Bond Stress Determination of Maximum Deflection and Dynamic j Reactions by Numerical Integration Shear Stress and Bond Strength k.
.
.
19 19 19 19
19 19 19 2C 2C 2C
2C 2C
1.
Summary.
^
2(
(
7-49
DESIGN OF ROOF SLAB a. Design Loading b. Dynamic Design Factors

VI
^ 2(
EM
Paragraph
c.
1110-31+5-417 15 Jan 58
page
d
e.
g.
h.
i.
First Trial Actual Properties First Trial - Equivalent Properties First Trial - Available Resistance vs Required Resistance Preliminary Design for Bond Stress Determination of Maximum Deflection and Dynamic Reactions "by Numerical Integration Shear Strength and Bond Stress Summary
-
206 206 206 207
207 209 209
7-50
FRELIMIMRY DESIGN OF COLUMN"

a.
b.
c.
d.
e.
Design Loading Mass Computation First Trial - Actual Properties First Trial - Determination of D.L.F. Second Trial - Actual Properties
209 210 210 211 211 212

213 213 215 215 215 217 218 218 220 220
7-51
DESIGN OF ROOF GIRDER Load Determination "b. Elastic Range Dynamic Design Factors c. Mass Computation d. First Trial - Actual Properties e. First Trial - Determination of D.L.F. f Preliminary Design for Bond Stress Determination of Maximum Deflection and Dynamic g. Reactions by Numerical Integration h. Shear and Bond Strength i Summary
a.
.
7-52
FINAL DESIGN OF COLUMN a. Mass Computation b. Column Properties c. Effect of Girder Flexibility do Loading e. Numerical Integration Computation to Determine Column Adequacy f Shear and Bond Stress g. Summary
.
221 221 222 222 223

224 225 226
DESIGN DETAILS
7-53
7-5!+
STRUCTURAL STEEL DETAILS
226
REINFORCED CONCRETE DETAILS
228
VII
'
Manuals
U. S.
Corps of Engineers Amor
TM 5-856-5 Change 1
ENGINEERING AND DESIGN

SINGLE-STORY FRAME BUILDINGS

INTRODUCTION
7-01
PURPOSE AND SCOPE.
This manual is one in a series issued for the
guidance of engineers engaged in the design of permanent type military

structures required to resist the effects of atomic weapons.
It is appli-
cable to all Corps of Engineers activities and installations responsible
for the design of military construction*
The material is based on the results of full-scale atomic tests and

analytical studies.
The problem of designing structures to resist the ef-
fects of atomic weapons is new and the methods of solution are still in the
development stage.
ft
Continuing studies are in progress and supplemental
material will be published as it is developed. The methods and procedures were developed through the collaboration
of many consultants and specialists.
Much of the basic analytical work
/as
done by the engineering firm of Araraann and "Whitney, New York City, under
contract with the Chief of Engineers.
The Massachusetts Institute of Tech-
nology was responsible, under another contract with the Chief of Engineers, for the compilation of material and for the further study and development
of design methods and procedures.
It is requested that any errors and deficiencies noted and any sug*
gestions for improvement be transmitted to HQDA (DAEN-MCE-D)
WASH DC 2031^.
7-02
REFERENCES.
Manuals
Corps of Engineers
Engineering and Design,
containing interrelated subject matter are listed as follows:
EM 1110-3^5-413 EM 1110-3^5-^1^ EM 1110-3^5-415
Weapons Effects Data Strength of Materials and Structural Elements Principles of Dynamic Analysis and Design
EM 1110-3^5-^17
15 Jan 58
7-02a
EM 1110-3U5-l*l6 EM 1110-31*5-1*17 EM 1110-31*5-^18 EM 1110-31*5-1*19 EM 1110-31*5-^20 EM 1110-31*5-1*21

a.
Structural Elements Subjected to Dynamic Loads Single-Story Frame Buildings Multi-Story Frame Buildings Shear Wall Structures Arches and Domes Buried and Semi -Buried Structures
In the
References to Material in Other Manuals of This Series.
text of this manual references are made to paragraphs, figures, equations,
and tables in the other manuals of this series in accordance vith the number designations as they appear in these manuals.
The first part of the
designation which precedes either a dash, or a decimal point, identifies a
__
EM
1110-3^5-^15 1110-3^5-^16
1110-31*5-^17 1110-31*5-^18
particular manual in the series as shown in the table following.

paragraph
35-
figure
35-
equation
(3* (5(6.
(7)
) )
67891011-
6.
78. 9-
) )
) )
(8.
(9-
1110-3^5-^19
1110-31*5-1*20 1110-31*5-1*21
10. 11.
(10. (ll.
b.
List of Symbols.
Definitions of the symbols used throughout this
manual series are given in a list following the table of contents in EM

1110-31*5 - 1* 13 through EM 1110-3^5-^16.
7-03
RESCISSIONS.
(Draft) EM 1110-3^5-1*17 (Part XXIII
The Design of
-
Structures to Resist the Effects of Atomic Weapons, Chapter 7 Story Frame Buildings).
7-Ql*
Single-
GENERAL.
This manual presents four numerical examples illustrating

-I*l6.
design procedures and principles given in EM 1110-3^5-^*13 through

The examples presented are as follows:
(1) The design of a one-story steel frame building, plastic deforma-
tion permitted.
(2) The design of a one-story steel frame building, elastic behavior.
(3) The design of a one-story reinforced concrete frame building, plastic deformation permitted.
(1*)
The design of a one-story reinforced concrete frame building, elastic and elasto-plastic behavior.
*U.
S.
GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE:
1973768111/665
7-05
EM 1110-3^5-^17
15 Jan 58
Before illustrating the design of buildings to resist blast loads it

is desirable to describe the behavior of the elements of a building frame
subjected to blast loads.
Accordingly, the first part of this manual is
devoted to a description of the response of single-story frame buildings to
vertical and lateral blast loads.
In the general discussion of frames, it
is assumed that the exterior vails are framed vertically between the founda-
tion and the roof so that the columns are loaded laterally only at the top
of the frame and are not subject to direct lateral loads such as to cause
them to resist these loads by beam action.
Columns subjected to directly
applied lateral loads are discussed briefly in paragraph 7-12.

7-05
BEHAVIOR OF SINGLE-STORY FRAMES.
Single-story frame buildings sub-
jected to lateral blast loads suffer a lateral deflection which is deter-
mined by the mass, stiffness, and strength of the structure, the variation
of loading with time, the distribution of load on the structure, and the dy-
namic behavior of the walls and roof.
The lateral loads on all vails are
transmitted to the roof and the foundations by vertical framing and are
carried laterally by the roof slab or roof lateral bracing to the girders
of the frame which in turn transmit the load to the columns.
The columns
carry the lateral loads to the foundation where the reactions are provided
by friction and passive pressure forces.
The lateral blast loads on the
walls are transmitted to the frame girders by either a lateral truss system
spanning between frames, or by the roof slab acting as a deep lateral beam.
The resistance of a building frame to lateral loads is a function of
the stiffness of the frame columns to relative displacement of the roof and
the foundation.
The equivalent
j
single-degree-of-freedom dynamic
system for the single- story frame
is a
J^JJM,,,,
r__^j^_ Moss(X)
concentrated mass supported
by a massless spring having the

lateral resistance properties of
the columns (fig. 7-l)
Figure
7.1.
Single-story frame and equivalent
The be-
dynamic system
havior of columns in a frame, and the procedure for designing the columns The in single-story buildings, are discussed in paragraphs 7-06 to 7-10.
design of roof girders is covered in paragraph 7-11.
EM 1110-345-1*17
15 Jan 58
7-06
7-06
SHEAR AMD MOMENT RESISTANCE OF COLUMNS.
Each column resists the lat-
eral motion of the frame through the action of shear forces and bending
uaonents in the columns as indicated in figure
72.
Tte shear resistance
in terms of the column bending

moments and the axial load is
Figwe
7.2- Shear resistance and bending moments in a column
R =
-
(elastic range) (7-1
subjected to lateral displacement and vertical load
Px
(plastic range)
(7.
la
where h
is the clear height of the column as in figure 7-1-
In the elasti
range the effect of joint rotation should be included.
Thus, using slope-
are joint rotations at bottom and top deflection equations where O and B of tine column, respectively, the moments are
2EI
(7-2]
1
20 + B *T
IT
In the plastic range the top and bottom moments are assumed to be equal to a maximum moment M_ so that
R = R
(7-3
The value of WL to be used in equation (7-3) is a variable dependent
upon the direct stress.

graphs
The effect of direct stress is discussed in paraIf there is no direct stress,
-07, ^ lib, and 7-07

"by
can be re-
placed
M^ giving
R
h
M^
P^
,
(7-3a
x
In equations (7.1) and (7-3), R is a function of

or h
.
and
In a given design tvo of the four factors are knovn; P

is of known variation with time.
and
are constants and
The remaining two
terms are related; i.e., for a given column,
is a function of
and
7-06
EM 1110-345-417 15 Jan 58
so that the
variation of and
P
.
and then
may be determined from the varia-
tion of
For a frame with infinitely rigid girders^ in the elastic range , the
relationship between
tion (7-2) by setting
and
5
in any column is obtained from equa-
m = 0_ = 0. X
h With infinitely rigid girders in the elastic range equation (7.1) becomes
2M R =
**
= IgEIx 3
" _
Px
17-5J
Equation (7-5) may be written in the form
R = kx
from which the equation for
(7.6)
for one column is
k =
(7-7)
To obtain the maximum elastic displacement x defined by figure 7.3, it is e necessary to obtain the maximum or plastic resistance R and divide toy the
spring constant
tion (7-7)
For a complete frame with
columns from equa-
(7.8)
and from equation (7-3a)j neglecting the entire effect of direct stress,
2Mp
so that
R
x
=
e
J5
=5^
c
(7-10)
Equations (7.8) and (7-9) apply only when all the columns of the story are
identical in strength and stiffness.
equations are modified as follows:
If this condition is not true, the
(7.11)
EM
15 Jan 58
7-07
R
where
=-h^ c
(7' lla )
ZMp
sum of plastic column moments in the story, and 21 = sum of I values for all columns in the story.
For the case in which the direct stress is considered important, the maximum resistance equation from equation (7-3) becomes
-
Px
(7-12)
and the maximum elastic displacement from equation (7. 10) becomes
Pxh
12EInh
(7-13)
where
M^
is a function of
(par, 7-07).
Equation (7-12) should be used
in numerical analyses where the effect of
and
can be introduced.
For preliminary design purposes wherein it is desirable, in order to

simplify the computations, to account for the approximate effect of
the design should be based on
2M n
R
7-07
[)
(7.UO
The value of
M^ and (7-13) is variable dependent upon the to be used in equations (7-12) The relationship is different for direct stress (pars. U-07 and U-ll).
steel and reinforced concrete.
THE EFFECT OF DIRECT STRESS ON COLUMN RESISTANCE.
A reinforced concrete section carrying both,
direct stress and bending moment has a higher moment -carry ing capacity for
a limited but important range of axial loads than the same section carrying
only bending moment.
However, a structural steel section carrying both
direct stress and bending moment has a lower moment -carry ing capacity than
the same section carrying only bending moment.
The limiting elastic deflection when significant axial loads are is determined from a present is determined from equation (7*13)> where
Mp
curve of P
vs ML prepared as described in paragraphs 1407 and t-11 (see
figs. IK 12 and 4.26).
As long as the moment
as determined from equa-
tion (7.*0 and the axial load P together determine a point on the PD
6
7-08
EM
15 Jan 58
graph which is inside the curve, the action of the column is elastic, and the M as calculated is used to determine R from equation (7-5). If the
point determined by the values of
and
lies outside the P
ML
T)
curve, the action is plastic and the limiting moment M
is the value of ML
corresponding to the axial load
In the preliminary design of reinforced concrete frames, it is de-
sirable to introduce the increased bending strength that results from axial
stress in the columns.
is generally
If this effect is neglected, the preliminary design
very conservative.
By introducing the direct stress effect a
more reasonable column size can be determined.
For steel columns the effect of direct stress is much less important
and,
in most cases, reasonable results are obtained by neglecting the ef-
fect of direct stress in the preliminary column design method of this
manual.
However, the effect of direct stress is usually considered in mak-
ing the numerical analysis which is used to check the preliminary design.
Column buckling under combined axial load and bending must be prevented in
order to maintain the lateral resistance of the frame.
In many designs the
column section is determined by buckling considerations.
For the buckling
criteria refer to paragraph U-07In the numerical integration method used to check the preliminary design results, the more comprehensive procedure involves consideration of
the individual column direct stresses and their effect on the bending re-
sistance of the individual column.
A study has been made to determine

In a series of typical problems, the
(l) average direct
whether this precision is necessary.
variation of resistance was determined on two bases:
stress equal to the sum of the column loads divided by the sum of the
column areas and (2) direct stress determined separately for each column
and applied to that column.
It has been determined that there is very
little loss in accuracy if the average direct stress is used.

7-08
THE EFFECT OF GIRDER FLEXIBILITY ON COLUMN RESISTANCE.
In the pre-
the liminary design of the columns, the frame response is determined on basis of the assumption that the joint rotations are negligible. If the
the error ingirders are designed to act in the elastic range (par. 7-ll)> If all the columns in a story have the same section volved is not large.
7
EM
15 Jan 58
7-08
and axe of equal height, this assumption results in equal moments at the
top and bottom of all columns and a linear variation of resistance with
displacement up to the plastic resistance.
If the assumption of infinitely
stiff girders is not made, the resistance-deflection diagram for a given
frame may be determined by a conventional sidesway analysis.
Neglecting the flexibility of the girders results in an overestimate

of the energy absorption capacity of the frame, thus resulting in under-
estimates of the displacement of the structure, and the required resistance

of the columns.
Any procedure which reduces the required resistance to a

It
value below that needed by the more exact procedure is unconservative.
is not desirable to incorporate the flexibility effects into the prelimi-
nary design procedure
The designs obtained by the preliminary design
method should be recognized as being slightly unconservative and allowance

should be made for this difference by the designer.
It is desirable to in-
clude this flexibility effect when the preliminary design is checked by a
numerical integration procedure.

The recommended procedure for approximating the effect of girder
flexibility for use in the numerical integration analysis of single-story

structures is described below.
Girder
Figure 7-3 presents the form of the
resistance-def lection diagram for a typical multicolumn frame subject to lateral load only.
Line A
represents the resistance for infinite girder

stiffness.
x
With infinite girder stiffness, plastic
hinges would develop simultaneously at both ends of

Deflection,
all columns.
Figure
Effect of girder flexibility on
7.3.
If the actual girder flexibility is
considered, the hinges would be found to develop
resistance-deflection
successively as indicated by line B.
The recom-
diagram of multibay
frames
mended resistance diagram is line
C,
an extension
of the initial slope of line B to the intersection
with the line of maximum resistance.

introduced.
The shaded area represents the error
Use of line C will result in the calculated deflections being

However, the error involved is generally
smaller than the true deflection.
very small.
To obtain the effective spring constant
for girder flexiThis can be
bility, it is necessary to determine the slope of line C. 8
7-09
EM 1110-345-41? 15 Jan 58
determined by imposing an arbitrary lateral deflection upon the frame and calculating the resistance corresponding to this deflection. The ratio of
the resistance to the displacement is k = R/x.
Paragraph 7-26 illustrates
the simple elastic frame analysis that is needed for this determination.
7-09
EFFECT OF IATERAL DEFLECTION ON CQ33JMN EESISTAKCE,
From equation
(7l)
it may be seen that the resistance is subject to reduction by the
combined effect of the lateral deflection and the axial column loads.
In
single-story frames this effect is small and is neglected in the preliminary design procedures, but it is included in the final numerical analysis.
7-10
DESIGN OF CQ3UMNS.
A general preliminary design procedure for plastic
behavior is presented in paragraph 6-11 and for elastic behavior in paragraph 6-12.
Details peculiar to application of these methods to single-
story column designs are explained below and illustrated in paragraphs 7-24
and 7-3^ for steel frames, and paragraphs 7-42 and 7-50 for reinforced concrete frames.
The loading, used in the preliminary column design is the
net lateral blast load as computed from procedures in paragraph 3-09>
neglecting the effect of dynamic response of wall panels and other interven^ng structural elements.
The dynamic effects of the mass and structural
properties of the walls are accounted for in the final check of the column
section by using the dynamic reactions to the front and rear walls in the
numerical integration.
column is given by
The equivalent mass concentrated at the top of the
= total roof mass + 1/3 column mass + 1/3
wall mass
In the preliminary design of steel columns the frame girders are assumed to be perfectly rigid, and the axial load in the columns is neglected
required moments, the spring constant, and the limiting elastic deflection of the columns can be obtained from equations (7-8) and (7.10).
so that the
From equation (7-9)
R h
P=^T
lyL
<
7 15)
-
The cross section required to provide the plastic bending moment resistance
is determined from data in paragraph 4-07 for steel columns.
The preliminary design procedure for reinforced concrete columns is different from that for steel because allowances are made for the effect of
EM lllO-S 1
15 Jan 58
^!?
7-10
direct stress on the bending resistance of the column.
After solving for
the required M- from equation (7- 1*0, it is necessary to determine the
dimensions of the cross section.
Since VL is a function of
(par, i-ll)
it is necessary to use the time average of the total axial load
for the
time interval estimated to be the plastic phase
Using equations from paragraph 4-llb for eccentrically loaded columns, a cross section is selected which will provide the necessary M^ at the average P
.
Having determined the necessary cross section, the next step is to

compute
and x
For both steel and concrete, k = 12EIn/h
However,
from equation (710)
(7-16)
for concrete
These parameters are used in the remainder of the design procedure without
modification by any load or mass factors because the single-story frame is

considered to be directly replaceable by a single-degree system.
The pre-
liminary design is then completed in accordance with the steps of either
paragraph 6-11 or paragraph 6-12.
After the girder is designed, the preliminary column design is verified by means of a step-by-step numerical integration procedure.
It is re-
quired that the displacement of the top of the column determined by this
computation be reasonably close to the design displacement determined from
consideration of paragraph 6-26.

The more exact numerical analysis includes all the factors which
have been neglected in order to simplify the preliminary procedure.

are:
These
the effect of girder flexibility, the effect of vertical load ec-
centricity, the effect of direct stress, and the effect of the dynamic response of the wall and roof elements on the lateral and vertical load-
time curves.
As discussed in paragraph 7-07, a simplification is possible
by using the average column axial loads instead of considering the individual columns separately.
The effect of girder flexibility is
determined as indicated in paragraph 7-08.

10
Examples of the numerical
7-11
EM 1110-3^5-^17 15 Jan 58
integration procedure applied to steel column designs are presented in paragraphs 1-2.6 and 7-36, and for reinforced concrete columns in paragraphs
7.44 and 7-52.
7-11
DESIGN OF ROOF GIRDERS.
The design of roof girders in building
frames for blast loads is a difficult problem which is complicated by the time variation of the lateral and vertical blast loads, and the difference
in time required for the different girders to reach maximum stress.
In
general, the maximum frame moments due to the vertical loads develop before
those due to the lateral loads.
Conventional static .loads must be considIn a building with openings it is
ered in addition to the blast loads.
possible to have internal pressures of such magnitude as to develop net
upward forces on the roof girders.

To obtain the maximum lateral stiff-
ness for the building frame, it is desirable

that the roof girders in frames be designed
to act elastically.
To simplify design proFigure
7.4.
cedures, continuous -span beams can be consid-
Single-span support
ered as single-span elements with restraints

as indicated in figure
7^-
It is recom-
assumptions for design of frame girders
mended that single- span frame girders such as
A be designed
elastically to
carry vertical loads as simply supported beams.
Exterior girders such as B
should be designed elastically to carry vertical loads as beams fixed at the
first interior support and pinned at the exterior support.
Interior girders
.
such as C should be designed elastically to carry the vertical loads as
beams fixed at both ends.
In order to develop the maximum lateral resist-
ance of the frame, it is necessary to design the girders so that the plastic
hinges form in the columns.
To insure this behavior, the bending strength
of the girders at any point must equal the moment at that point due to
static and dynamic vertical loads, plus the moment due to lateral motion. The latter is computed by applying to the girder the full plastic hinge
moments of all the columns simultaneously.
This is conservative because it
assumes that all the maximum moments develop at the same time.
Consideration of the "blast loading on frame girders shows that the

front girder is the critical girder in a multibay frame and the critical section is at the first interior support. At this section the frame moment
11
EM 1110-345-417
15 Jan 58
7-11
in the girder should be a fraction of the column msffcimum moment M-.
For a
2-bay frame use 1/2 ML. frame use 5/8 ML.
For a 3-bay frame use 2/3 M_ and for a 4-bay
The design procedure recommended for girders is an elastic design

"based upon paragraph 6-12 and consists of the following steps which are il-
lustrated in paragraphs 7-25, 7-35^ 7-43^ and 7-51-
order to perform
these operations, it is necessary to refer freely to other manuals for information; viz. , to EM 1110-345-413 for overpressure -time variation on
roofs, to EM 1110-345-414 for the equations governing the plastic moment
capacity of steel and concrete girders, to EM 1110-345-415 for the elastic
response characteristics of single -degree-of -freedom systems, and to EM

1110-345-4 16 for the factors which define the equivalent single-degree -of -
freedom system.
Step
I,
Obtain the vertical load-time curve for the girder from the
dynamic reaction of the roof element which the girder supports.
Idealize
the curve to a form for which dynamic load factors are available.
Step 2.
determination-
Estimate the dynamic load factor for preliminary size
Step 3
Calculate T
the period of vibration of the equivalent
single-degree-of -freedom system,

constant
is a function of mass
and spring
The
The equations for
are given in EM 1110-345-4l6.
mass to be used is the mass which is considered to move with the girder.
In EM 1110-345-4l6 consideration is given to beams which have mass varia-
tions that are triangular in spanwise distribution as well as concentrated

at local points.
Step 4.
Using T
and
the time parameter of the loading, obtain
a new value of dynamic load factor from figures 5.20 and 5.21.
Step
5-
With the new dynamic load factor, determine the design moDetermine the total moment by
ment required for vertical blast loads.
adding the static load moments and the proper fraction of the column
plastic moment.
Select a size to withstand the indicated bending moments
in accordance with EM 1110-34-5-414 requirements*
and D-L-F., and check n> the section for the revised bending moments including the allowances
Step 6.
Repeat the cycle, computing T
T/ T
12
7-12
EM 1110-345-417
15 Jan 58
described above until satisfactory agreement is realized.

If the loading curve cannot be approximated by the idealized shapes used in figures 5*20 and 5,21 it may be necessary to perform a step-
Step 7.
by-step numerical integration to check the design for the loading curve IATERAL LOADS ON THE GOIIJMMS. There are certain arrange7-12
.
ments of the structural elements in framed buildings which would require that the columns be capable of resisting directly applied transverse loads
in addition to providing the resistance to lateral motion of the frame
-
This condition is indicated in
F(t)
figures 7-5(a) and (b).
Figure
7- 5 (a)
A
7J9T
corresponds to the case of a frame building with exterior walls which act as two-
~*A
7J7T 777T
D
7777
(b)
ray panels.
Two edges of the panel load
Figure 7.5.
Columns subjected
the columns directly^ and the other
to directly applied lateral loads
edges transmit load to the roof and the
foundation.
The portion of the load transmitted to the roof is indicated
by F(t).
The column loading w(t) is assumed to be uniformly distributed.
Figure 75(h) corresponds to the case of a frame building with the exterior
wall framed horizontally.
7-13
In this case^ there is no concentrated load F(t).

The orientation of the blast wave with
LOADS
01"
FRAME STOUCTURES.
any element of a building should be assumed to be that which will produce

the critical load on that elementis produced
The critical load for an exterior wall

Frames
by a blast wave acting perpendicular to the wall.
should be designed for the load produced by the blast moving parallel to
the plane of the frame.
For roof slabs the critical load is a function of
two considerations^ the location of the element and the direction of the
blast wave.
Paragraph 3-05 shows that the overpressures on the central
portion of a roof of rectangular plan subjected to a blast wave moving normal to the long axis are less than the overpressures at and near the
For the same roof plan^ all roof elements would be subjected to the same intensity of overpressure if the direction of the blast wave movement is
ends.
parallel to the long axis of the building.
On the central portions of
square roofs the overpressures for all orientations of blast wave are less
than at the edges of the roof.

13
EM 1110-3^5-^17
15 Jan 58
7-14
The outside dimensions of the structure must be used in computing the
blast loading on the structure.
This means that the member sizes must be
assumed initially to obtain the outside dimensions in order to compute the

loads,
l^rge difference between the assumed dimensions and final design
dimensions would require a revision of loads.

7-1^
FRAMING ARRMGEMEMTS.
In the blast resistant designs of this manual
there are no radical departures from conventional framing arrangements.
In
reinforced concrete frame structures, the exterior columns are made independent of the exterior walls and the walls are designed to span vertically
between the wall footing and the roof slab.
This arrangement is desirable
and most economical because it eliminates the necessity of designing the
column to act as a beam spanning between the foundation and the girder in
addition to providing restraint to the lateral motion of the frame.

7-15
ERELIM33MRY DESIGN METHODS.
The design of each element of a building
consists of two steps.
The first step is the preliminary design of the
element using an idealized straight line load- time curve and the design
charts presented in EM 1110- 3^- 5-^- 15
The second step is the numerical in-
tegration check of the preliminary design using the calculated load- time
data.
The following discussion deals with some of the details of the pre-
liminary design method.
Only one mass factor and one load factor may be used in any of the preliminary design methods.
Therefore, average values of these factors
must be obtained for all designs in the plastic range and also for elastic
designs in which there is a bilinear resistance function.
In the case of a
fixed-end beam designed to allow plastic deformation at midspan, the average of the e las to -plastic and plastic mass and load factors should be used
to obtain the mass and load factors for use in the preliminary design.
The
elastic values of mass and load factors are not used in computing these
average values since only a small percentage of the total deflection occurs
within the elastic range.

For a simple beam designed for plastic action, the average of the
elastic and plastic values of mass and load factors should be used.
In the
case of a fixed-end beam designed for plastic action at the support and
elastic action at the
center line,
the average of the elastic and
7-16
EM 1110-3^5-^17 15 Jan 58
In
elasto-plastic mass and load factors is used in the preliminary design.

general, any reasonable method of obtaining a single set of mass and load
factors will be satisfactory for use in the preliminary design.

7-16
NUMERICAL PmSGElATION AMAIgSIS.
The numerical integration analysis
is a method of checking the preliminary design that takes into account the
irregularity of the load-time curve, the variation in resistance function,
and the changes in mass-load factors.
In this manual each preliminary deIn some cases, it may
sign is checked by the numerical integration method.
be necessary to use the numerical integration method more than once before
a satisfactory design is obtained.
This is particularly true where the
actual load curve is of such a shape that a good approximation to it cannot

be obtained by a straight line, and also in design of steel where the number of available beam sections is limited.
An experienced designer may
judge that a numerical integration check of some designs is unnecessary.
numerical integration analysis may be needed in some cases primarily to obtain the dynamic reactions of the element for use as the load on the sup-
porting structure.
The load-time curves used in the numerical integration analysis are
computed from either the direct -blast -pressure vs time curve or from the dynamic reactions of the supported elements. The dynamic reactions axe com-
puted by the use of the formulas of tables 6.1 to 6.6.

eral, the formulas vary with the
Note that, in gen-
strain condition of the beam or slab.

The dynamic reaction curve for an ele-
ment designed to have some plastic
action has a form indicated by line A

in figure 7.6.
Line B in figure 7-6

Time (sec)
is the pseudostatic reaction (for a
simple beam it equals one-half the
Figure
7.6.
Simplification of dynamic reaction curve
applied load).
t^ cates the first instance after the maximum reaction develops for which the
The time
indi-
dynamic reaction is less than the pseudostatic reaction. If the dynamic load on the supporting structures is required for a
period of time exceeding
t-,,
it is recommended that the load be represented
15
EM
1110-3^5-14-17 15 Jan 58
7-17
by line A before t
and by line B after t
This simplifies the load shape
in a reasonable manner and reduces the number of tedious steps in the
numerical integration
7-17
SUMMARY OF DESIGN EXAMPLES.
In this paragraph the results of all the
illustrative design examples which are contained in the remainder of this
manual are
summarized to provide a ready reference for preliminary designs
of similar elements and buildings.
Examples are for incident overpressure
and duration indicated in figure 7*8

Table
7.1.
Summary of Design Examples
in
EM
1110-345-417
NUMERICAL EXAMPLE^ DESIGN OF A (ME- STORY STEEL FRAME BUILDHSG, PIASTIC DEFORMATION
7-18
GEIÊRALo
This nimierical example presents the design of one bay of a
windowless one-story^ steel^ rigid-frame "building with plastic deformation
permitted (fig, 7-7)-
Tê design overpressure (10 psi from an 18-KT

In an actual
weapon) is arbitrarily selected for illustrative purposes
case the design overpressure would be determined by evaluating a group of
considerations including many nonstructural design considerations.
The
example includes only the designs of the major elements of the structure^
including the roof slab^ purlins^ wall slab, columns and girders of the
frame , and the foundation.
One-way reinforced concrete slabs are used for the roof and walls.
16
7-18
EM 1110-3^5-^17 15 Jan 58
The concrete compressive strength

is specified at 3000 psi and in-
termediate grade reinforcing

steel is used.
In accordance
with EM 1110-345 -la^ a uniform

dynamic increase factor of 1.3
is used, giving the following
strength properties for use in

the design concrete
f = 3000 psi
Cross
Section
E
\^
- 3900 psi b = 3(10 ) Psi
n = 10
reinforcing steel
f
= 40,000 psi '
f^
= 52,000 psi
Plan of Typical Bay
The purlins, columns, and girders
are wide flange structural shapes
with welded connections.
The
Figure
7.7.
Plan and section of
strength properties are specified in EM

1110-3l4-5-4ll4-.
steel frame building
The structure is to be located upon a compact sand-gravel mixture exhibiting the following properties (par. 4-15).
Normal load-bearing capacity = 10 kips/sq. ft

Ultimate load-bearing capacity = 30 kips/sq. ft
Coefficient of friction (soil on soil) =0.50 Coefficient of friction (concrete on soil) = 0-75 3 Unit weight of soil = 100 lb/ft
Normal component of passive pressure coefficient, Kp^ = 10 Modulus of elasticity, E = 40,000 psi
It must be emphasized that the primary purposes of this example and
those that follow are to illustrate the design techniques and philosophy
presented in the previous manuals.
Presentation on this example should not
be considered a recommendation of the structural system for use in blastresistant buildings.

17
EM
III-DESIGN PROCEDURE,
7-19
15 Jan 58
7-19
In general blast-resistant design proceeds from
the outside to the inside because the dynamic reactions of the outside
elements are used for the loading on the supporting, members.

the Design procedure are as follows:
The steps in
Step 1
Compute the pressure variations from which the design loads

The following curves are needed in addition to some local
can be obtained.
roof overpressure curves which are introduced in paragraph 7-22:

(1) Incident overpressure vs time curve (fig. 7.8)
(2) Front face overpressure vs time curve (fig. 7-9) (3) Rear face overpressure vs time curve (fig. 7-10)
(4) Net lateral overpressure vs time curve (fig. 7.11)
(5) Average roof overpressure vs time curve (fig.
7.12)
Step 2.
Using the procedure of paragraph 6-11 for design with plastic
deformation and a triangular load-time curve idealized from the front face
overpressure-time curve make a preliminary design of a wall slab.
Check
the design using the numerical integration procedure of paragraph 5-08 and
the computed front face overpressure -time curve.
In this analysis the dy-
namic reaction of the wall slab at the roof and foundation are obtained for
later use.
^ v
Step
3.
Design the roof slab by the same procedure used for design
of the wall slab with a triangular load-time curve idealized from the in-
cident overpressure-time curve for the preliminary step, and use the actual
incident overpressure-time curve in the numerical integration to check the

slab deflection.
The dynamic reactions are obtained for use in the purlin
design.
Step k.
Base the purlin preliminary design on the same idealized
load-time curve used in the roof slab design.
However^ for the numerical
integration analysis use the load obtained from the roof slab dynamic reaction. From the numerical analysis of the purlin obtain the design load
for the girder.
Step
5.
Make a preliminary design of the columns assuming the girders
to be infinitely rigid and neglecting the effect of axial load on the column. A triangular load-time curve idealized from the net lateral
pressure-time curve is used in the preliminary design.

18
7-20
EM 1110-345-1H7 15 Jan 58
Step 6.
Design the frame girders using the procedure of paragraph

In this preliminary design the load-time curve is
6-12 for elastic design.
idealized from the variation of purlin dynamic reactions,

Step 7
Check the preliminary column design by determining the maxi-
mum lateral deflection of the frame considering the relative flexibility of

the columns and girders and the effect of axial load on column resistance.
Use the wall slab dynamic reactions at the roof line for the design lateral
load on the frame.
Step 8.
Design the foundation.

The computation of the various pressure-time
In this example the
7-20
LOAD DETEEMIMTIOIT.
curves is explained in detail in EM 1110-345-413.
methods are illustrated by presenting the computations for one point on
each of the curves.
The dimensions of the structure used in the load com-
putations are the outside dimensions of the building vhich are determined
at this stage of the design by estimating the sizes of the slabs and
girders (fig. 7-7)a.
Incident Overpressure vs Time Curve.
Assumptions of the incident
overpressure and time duration used in the illustrative examples in this
manual are given in figure 7-8. 1 1 = W / 3 (0.262) = 18 / 3 (0.262) = 0.685 sec t

,
The incident over pressure- time curve (fig. 7-8) is obtained from figure 3.4b.
bo
c
Front Face Overpressure vs Time Curve (Fig.

= 12QO fps (fig. 3.21)
=
79)
^ refl =
_3^_
= 25
'
M1P
= 0.0372 sec
refl
Q
q.
= 2.23 psi (fig- 3-23)
Overpressure = P s + 0,85<1
q
is obtained using table 3.2.
is obtained using table 3.1.
For example, for t = 0.100 sec, t/t Q = 0.146 = 2.23(0.513) = 1.14 psi (table 3-2) q.
P
S
= 10.0(0.738) = 7.38 psi (table 3.1)
+. front
= 7.38 + 0.85(1. 1^) = 8.35
Folio-wing the procedure of figure 3-25, the front face overpressure
vs time curve may be drawn.

19
7-2Cb
15 Jan 58
u
<&
0>
20
7-20b
EM
15 Jan 58
5
<0 CO
21
IM 1110-345 -in?
15 Jan 58
7-20b
fl
C30
CD
(isd)
22
7-201)
EM 1110-3^5-^17 15 Jan 58
!*
s<u
EM 1110-3^5-^17 15 Jan 58
7-20b
00
eCO
(isd)*
OOJ
d 'djnssdJdjaAQ
2k
7-20c
EM 1110-345-^17 15 Jan 58
c.
Eear Face Overpressure vs Time Curve (Fig. 7.10).
Length of structure, L = ^3.5 ft U 1^03 fps (fig. 3.9), C = 1115 fps (par. 3-08a) Q
sec
sec
At time t
= 8.42 psi
t^
= 0.088 sec, using table 3*1, P = 10.0(0.842) gb

= 0.735 from figure 3-27b, P back/P sb
At time t
1^,
Therefore, P DacK, = 0.735(8.42) = 6.20 psi For times in excess of t = t , + t, , the ratio of P
CL
Dadc /P s
is as given
in figure 3.27b.
d.
Net Lateral Overpressure vs Time Curve (Fig.
7ll)
At any time
net
e
back front Average Roof Overpressure (Fig, 7* 12)*
_ "p
For the blast propagation

= 0.0310
direction normal to the long side of the building, at time t = L/U

sec
roof
=0.9+0
-h^J
CI.P
-"
91
(fig- 3.3*0
= 10.0(0.957) = 9-57 psi
(table 3.1)
Therefore,
= 0.91(9,57) = 8-71 psi at t = 0.0310 sec

y
For times in excess of t = L/U

in figure 3.34.
the ratio of P
7 roof /P s
is as given
7-21
DESIGN OF
ALL SIAB.
The wall is de-
signed as a one-way reinforced concrete slab spanning from a fixed support at the founda-
tion to a pinned support at the roof slab.

The slab is permitted to deform into the
17. 5'
L=I7.5'
plastic region by developing plastic hinges

at the foundation and near midheigjit.
The
span length of the slab is equal to the clear
height of the wall.

25
EM 1110-3^5-417
15 Jan 58
7-21a
The preliminary plastic design procedure is described and illustrated
by an example in paragraph 6-11.

ing vertical vail slabs.
Dead loads are not considered in design-
The design calculations are made for a one-foot
vidth of slab.
a.
Design Loading.
The design load as idealized from the computed
loading shown by figure 7*9 is defined by:

B
=
63.8 kips
B .
T = 0.062 sec
_ = BT = -*-^ * s ,, x / (63.8)0.062 = T ^0 H -771.98 kip- sec (par. 6-11)

,
-
T 0.062 sec
Time
(sec)
b.
Dynamic Design Factors.
(Refer to
table 6.1.)
Elastic range:
K^
,
= 0.58,
'
78
%
L
1
'S
185EI
'
0.26R
0.12P,
0.19P
Elasto -plastic range:

= 0.50,
KIM
'
'
78
ep
V = 0.39R + 0.11P
Plastic range:
= 0.50,
KL
KIM
0.66
= 0.38R + 0.12P
Average values:
0.33
160EI
13
26
I
7-21c
EM
15 Jan 58
c.
First Trial
Actual Properties.
Assume p = 0.015 (par. 4-10 )

Let ap = 5 (par.- 6-26)
Assume C
= 0.7 (experience)
= 0.7(63.8) =
K7
kips
= 0.015(52) (l)d 2
_ R " m
^ ^T
_ (I2)0.688d ~
1775
jl
7(3^1.
'
0-688d
kip-ft (d
in inches)
W
..
7>
d = 9-73
in.
d = 9-75 in., Try h = 11 in., 2 M- = 0.688(9. 75 ) =65.4 kip-ft
p = 0.015
.'
i-.cover
4
1.25"
= bh3 /12 = (11 ) 3 = 1331 in. = bd 3
No.8bors
[^
+ P (i
k)
]
0.015(1
-o.
= 0.905d3 = 0. 905 (9. 75 ) 3 - 839 in.

+ x+) = 0.5(1331 + 839) = 1085
= (160)3(10 ) 1085
^ = ap y_ - 5(0.0661f) = 0.3320 ft (par. 6-26) m

jci
**
Mass
d.
2.^06 = - _.) - kip- sec m = 0.07^7 jt g2>2
o
(eq.
First Trial
= KJR
jLi
Equivalent System Properties.

25-5 kips 27
6.12)
me
= 0.57(^-8)
EM
15 Jan 58 = 0.57(1*98) = 1.13 kip-sec (eg. 6.2)
7-21e
= 0^2(0.07^7) =
0.0311*-
2 kip-sec /ft
(eq.
6.2)
20.33 ft-kips
(eq.
6.10)
T
e.
0.058 sec
(eq. 6.
HO
Work Done vs Energy Absorption Capacity.
T
=
T/Tn
R^/B
062/0.058 = 1.07
= Wf-,8/63.8 = 0.70 (eq,s 6.15, 6.l6)
= (0.8)0.062 a
O.Oij-9
sec
The idealized load-time curve is satisfactory since it agrees reasonably with the actual load-time curve (fig. 7-9) (see par. 5-13) C = 0.365 (fig- 5-27) = C W = 0.365(20.33) = 7A2 ft-kips (eq. 6.17)
E = R (y me
0.5y) = 25-5 [0.3320

jCi
0.5(0.0664)]
in,
= 7.62 ft-kips (eq. 6.18)
E > W,
design.
.*.
the selected proportions are satisfactory as a prelimineur
f.
Preliminary Design for Bond Stress.
It is now necessary to
select the reinforcing steel for the critica

cross sections.
8.5
1
At the fixed end of the waul
1.0"
No.
at 5
2" cover
2.5*
the cover requirement results in a smaller value of d =8.5 in. than at midspan^ d = 9.
in.
At Fixed End
To achieve approximately the same
No.
8 at 5"
Cover
1,25
both critical sections several values of

are investigated to obtain the value of
p
p
j
9.75'
1.0
for which
At Midspon
12
Mp
= 65.^ kip-ft.
plot of equation
simplifies this
computation.
From such a plot p = 0,0l6,

28
7-2lg
EM 1110-345-417 15 Jan 58
At the fixed end

= 0.5R = 0.5(44.8) = 22.4 kips Estimated V m max
Allowable u = 0.15f = 0.15(3000) = 450 psi c

f
= pbd =
5
0.016(12X8.5) = 1,63
in.
,
in.
Try #6 at
= 1.9 in.
P
,
Zo = 7-5 in.
At the pinned end

Estimated V
_ ~ = (l/3)
= 1/3(44.8) = 15-0 kips

_ . " 3 9 in "
.
JL
ujd
- 8(15,000) "
'
7(450)9.75
A 8 = pbd
Try #8 at
= 0.0l6(l2)(9.75) = 1-87 in5 in.,
As
= 1.9 in.
2
,
Zo = 7-5 in.
Determination of
Maxim-urn
Deflection and Dynamic Reactions by
N-umerical Integration.
= 70.0 kip-ft (eq U.l6) = 0.0i86( 5 2)(l)(8.5) 2

[l
*-
i^^fl =
'
59-5 kip-ft
= 1331 in.
t
bd 3
|"k ^
2 - k) = 12(9.75 ) 3 /3 + np(l ] k +
[^2?
+ o.l62(l
0.
= 880 in. I
=0.5(1
>
L) ^
= 0.5(1331 + 880) = 1105
kips
Mass
^^
-
= 0.07^7
kip-sec/ft
Elastic range:
R.
1m
17
. 27 . 2 kips
29
EM 1110-31*5-417
15 Jan 58
= (185)3(10 ) 1105 3
,11*1*(17.5)
I
3
18|EI 3
kips/f t
*e
793
= 0.031*1* f1
Elasto-plastic range:
.
381*
m
381*EI
H59.5+2(70)]
17-5
= 329 kips/ft
m k
^6
kips
ep
m
k
ep
"
= 0.0341* +
^'
'*
- 0.090 ft
Plastic range:
= 45-6 kips
Since
M^
^ ML
the formula for k^ in table 6.1 is not usable.

]c,, HI
To
obtain a value for y_ and p

Maximum Deflection
=
an "effective resistance" line is selected
on
5y E
figure 7-13 so that the area under it up

to
y-,
Jii
is equal to the area under the
cal
culated elasto-plastic resistance line.

LJ
.
Jllm'_ZI-Z ^
ki k,kE =
=793 kips/ft 793

=
The required value of y- = 0.0715 ft.
ep
s =
638 kips/ft 329 kips/ft

0.0344ft 0.0715ft 0.090ft
ye y
ycp
m
Deflection, y(ft)
= 5(0.0715) = 0.3575
Figure 7.13. Resistance function for 11-in. wall slab spanning 17.5 ft
fixed at base and pinned at top
n
= 0.06 sec
The basic equation for the numex*jLoi
integration in table J.2 is y

where
= y (At) n
(table 5.3)
(r-
30
7-21g
EM 1110-345-417 15 Jan 58
Table
7.2.
Determination of Maximum Deflection and Dynamic Reactions for Front Wall Slab
(P
R )25(10")
yn (At)
0.78(0.0747)
2 =
(P
;
- ^29(10' )(P n
=
elastic range n ) ft,
' x 0.78(0. 747)
^29(lO~
4
)(Pn
ft, elasto-plastic
range
-
^
(par.
At)
0.66(S.074 T )
' 5-07(10'
)(Pn
n ) ft, plastic range
The time interval At = 0.005 sec is approximately T /10 = 0.006

5-08).
The dynamic reaction equations are listed in paragraph 7-21b.
The P
values for the second column are obtained from figure 7-9^ multiplying by
ll*l*(l7.5)/1000 = 2.52,
in table 7.2, is 0.30 ft The maximum def lection, (y ) n max , computed which is less than the allowable y of 0.35 ft.
yE
068 ft
(y,
= 1*.2
<
0,0715
5-0; OK
EM 1110-3^5-^17 15 Jan 58
k-
7-21h
Shear and Bond Strength.

)
:
For bottom of vail (fixed end of
idealized- slab
max =23.1 kips (table 7.2)

(eq. k.2ka.)
For no shear reinforcement
v
/
= O.CA-f
'
+ 5000p = O.(&(3000) + 5000(0.0162) = 120 + 81 = 201 psi

.
v =
Tbd
. 8(23,100) _ 2 8 " " 5 P 7(12)8.5
Shear reinforcement required for 258
201 = 57 psi.
r
Contribution of shear
reinforcement to allowable shear stress
V
use s =
)
:
r=
ifo;feo
001*
in.
Try 1 #3,
.
A c = 0.11
S
2
*
r =
in.
For top of vail (pinned end of idealized slab
max =23.1 kips (table 7*2)

,-Corner Dowels No. 8 at 10"
3 '-4"
y v __Z ~ 8(23,100)
Tbd
7(12)9.75
= 201 psi
Shear reinforcement required for

226
-
201 = 25 psi
r = 25/^0,000 = 0.0006 2 Try 1 #2, A g = 0.05 in.
No.8
at 10-
r .
/.
^ bs
s
s
= 0,05 . 0>0006 ; 10s
=8.3
in.,
use
Bond:
= 8 in.
u =
8V
8(23,100)
Allowable u = 0.15 f^ = 0.15(3000) = 1*50 psi >

**
psi; OK
i*
2"Cover Outside
Foundation Steel Not Slab Steel Not Shown
Shown
Siammary.
11- in.
slab,
p =
32
0.0162
7-22
EM 1110-345-417 15 Jan 58
Shear reinforcement:
Bottom of vail #3 at 7-1/2 in.

Top of wall #3 at 8 in.
7-22
DESIGN OF ROOF SLAB,
The roof slab is designed as a one-way rein-
forced concrete slab spanning continuously over purlins located at the third-points of the supporting girder.
As stated previously, the general arrangement of the members in this
example is not selected as
the result of economic
studies.
1.,..,..
...k-..
3 1/2"
:;
,.,
:,.:-,
..^^.:
This example is
intended primarily to illustrate design technique.

The slab is per6'-8"
mitted to deform into the

plastic region by developi
1
ing plastic hinges at both

L* 6'-8"
supports and midspan.
In
the design procedures of

this manual only single-span elements can be handled, therefore in using
the preliminary plastic design procedure -of paragraph 6-11 a one-foot width of slab is considered to be a fixed-end beam spanning 6 ft '8 in., the
purlin spacing.
a.
Loading.
The critical slab loading is the incident overpressure
vs time curve (fig. 7-8).

18
18'
18'
18'
This loading results from the blast wave moving parallel to the long axis of the building.
20'
Since the slab is framed perpen-
dicular to the direction. of the blast wave the load may be considered to be
20
'
Zone
all
- Incident
overpressure
at
-uniformly distributed along each slab The individual one -foot slab span. elements along the purlin reach their
points of roof.
maximum deflections at different times;

This effect
to adjacent elements. however, they provide little restraint

is neglected in this example.
33
EM 1110-345-417 15 Jan 58
For the blast rave moving perpendicular to the long axis of this
7-22b
building the design loads on the slab are

reduced from the incident overpressure
loads for tvo reasons:
(l) the time required
to build up load on the slab is finite and

zones 2
(2) the Zone 3 overpressures are less than
the incident overpressure (EM 1110-345-413).

The design load as idealized from the
computed loading shovn by figure 7.8 is
defined by
-* . L 10 psi = 10(144)6.67
-in
-
V-
-,
~ 4 9.6 kips
,
B =9.6 kips
T = 0.38 sec
(9*6)0.38 _ ~ 2
"
a,
-
Design Factors.
Elastic range:
(Refer to table 6.1.)

Time (see)
0.38 sec
= 0.53,
=
KIM L
"
'
77
1m
V = 0.36R +
Elasto-plastic rsuoge:
^ = 0.64,
8
KJJ
= 0.50,
_ 38ÊI
CT 3
= 0.78
ep
V = 0.39R
Plastic range:
= 0.50,
-f
0.11P
KL
= 0.33,
o66
= 0.38R + 0.12P m = 0.5(0.78 +
Average values: = 0*5(0.64 + 0.50) = 0.57, E^
77) = o.?7
= 0.5(0.50
-f
0.33) = 0.42
34
7-22c
EM 1110-345-417 15 Jan 58
c.
HE* KPS "P Assume p = 0.015 (par. ^-10)

Let op = 5 (par. 6-26)
^
m
First Trial
-
Actual Properties.
Assume CL = 1.0 (experience)

Jt\
= CJ3 = 1.0(9.6) = 9.6 kips K
= 0.015(52)(l)d
1 = o.688d2 kip-ft (d in inches)

2
- 9.b, 6
.
.
H R
F _-_
16M
_ (I6)o.688d
d = 2.5 in., Try h = 3.5 in., 2 = M = 0.688(2. 5 ) 4-3 kip-ft

16M
~
*
p = 0.015,
np = 0.15
m
g
P _ 16(4.3) _ 10 ~ ~ 3 kips
-
6.67
= (3.5) 3 = *2.9 in.

=
No. 4'
M
J3
cover
1.0
bd3
1^
+np(l
k;
= 12 ( d )3
in.
0.15(1
= 0.905d 3 = 0.905(2.5) 3
+ I.) = 0.5(14.1 a =0.5(1 S
+ 42. 9) = 28.5 in.
1,.
3 _ 307EI = (307)3(10) 28.5 = 6l5 kips/ft 3 (6.67) 144
y = JB = 615 = o.0l68 ft Ê kg = op y = 5(0.0168) = 0.084 ft (par. 6-26) y

The roofing weight is 6 psf
.
weight ,
.0]
g g g
, 0.332
35
EM
15 Jan 58
Mass m =
First Trial
= 0.0103 kip-sec 2 /ft

-
me
m
-E =
-57(l0.3) = 5-8? kips (eq 6.12)

(eq.
0,57(1.83) = l.<* kip-sec
6.2)
me
= O.OC&32 kip-sec /ft (eq 6.2)
2m
= 2*
e.
2(0.00^32)
= 125 ft - kiP s
e(l
6 10 )
-
-~
= 6.28
y 0.77(0. 0103 )/6l5
= 0.0226 sec (eq 6.lk]
Work Done vs Energy Absorption Capacity. C = T/ T = 38/0. 0226 =16.9 T n

-
Rm/B
= 10.3/9-6 = 1.075 (eqs 6.15, 6.l6)
t^T
t
= 0.09 (fig. 5-29)
= (0.09)0.38 = 0.03^ sec
Idealized load-time curve is satisfactory at t = 0.03^

C
= 0.005 (fig. 5-27)
W^
= C W = 0.005 (1.25) = 0.625 ft-kips (eq 6.17) w p
E = R
=
me (ym
"
'
5yE ) = 5 8T
'
08 ^
"
0.5(0.0168)]
0.^5
.".
ft-kips (eq 6.18)

the selected proportions are unsatisfactory as a
E < W,
nary design.
f.
Second Trial
/-\
-m N
Actual Properties.
=
'
r~
/TT
KL
0.5(0.625
(0.57)
-
(y 'm
V~
0.5(0.0168)]
= 12.3 kips (eq 6.19)
16M
2
_ (l6)0.688d
6.67
=
= 12.3,
/.
d = 2.7 in.
3-3A
in ^
d = 2 ~3A
= 0.688d
= 0. 688(2. 75)
= 5-2 kip-ft
=12.5 kips
7-22g
EM 1110-345-417
15 Jan 58
= (3-75) 3
I
t
53.0 in,
4 3 = 0.905d3 = 0.905(2. 75) = 18.8 in. (k = 0.42)

+
.
V
e
4 '5(53.0 + 18.8) = 35-9 in.

-"
33
R
.
(6 67) (ll^)
77,
yE =
= 0.0161 ft
ym
yE = 5(0.0l6l) = 0.0805 ft (par. 6-26)

+ 6.ol
J
6j!
10(
Mass m =
_,
. ~_
= 0.0109 kip- sec /ft

-
g.
Second Trial
=
me
Vm =
57(12.5) = 7-13 kips (eq 6.12)
= 0.57(1.83) = 1.04 kip-sec (eq 6.2) = 0.42(0.0109) = 0.00459 kip-sec 2 /ft (eq 6.2)
/
-
xO.
\-
IL-
2m
2(0.00459)
= 118 ft-kips (eq 6.10)
T = n
h.
0.0207 sec

= T/T = 0.38/0.0207 n
=18.3
C = R /B = 12.5/9.6 = 1.3 (eqs 6.15, 6.26) m R = o.o4 (fig. 5.29)
tj/r
t
C
= (0.04)0.38 = 0.015 sec
w Wm
= 0.0015 (fig. = C
5-27)
(eq.
001 5(ll8) = 0.177 ft-kips

-
6.17)
E = R
o.5yE ) = 7.13 [0.0805 me (ym = 0.516 ft-kips (eq. 6.18)
0.5(0.0161)]
Although the difference between

37
and
is great no other trial
EM 1110-345-417 15 Jan 58
is justified since slab thickness was increased
"by
7-221
only 1/4 in.
Therefore
the selected proportions are satisfactory as a preliminary design,

i.
Estimated
V,
mcLX.
= 0.5R = 0.5(12.5) = 6.25 kips in

1*50
Allowable u = 0.15^ = 0.15(3000) =
psl (par. 4-
V
ujd
8(6250) 450(7)2.75
5.77 in.
Try #3 at 2-1/2 in.,
A s =0.53
in.
So = 5.7 in.
0.16,
14
3.75
'No. 3 of
1/2"
np = 10(0.016)
=r
0.16
3.
Determination of Maximum Deflection and Dynamic Reactions by
Numerical Integration.
- p
V
?
0.0l6(52)(l)(2.75)"
[l
^Yte
5-5 kip-ft
(eq.
4.l6)
I o
= bh3 /l2 = (3-75) 3 = 53-0
+ 2np - np = 0.428
3
I = t
bd3
[k
/3 + np(l
3
:
2
k)
]
1* 3 = 19-6 in.
H2(2.75)
I
a,
^- + 0.16(1
+ 6.ol
J 1UUU
0.428 f\ =
J
0. 945(2. 75)
= 0.5(1
o
'
+ l ) = 0.5(53.0 + 19.6) = 36.3 f ^
3 7 Weight = F L
ô^
-Ld.
|^ = 0.352 kips
Mass m =
Elastic range
:
'^ g
= 0.0109 kip-sec /ft
B
k
1m
weight
3
- 0.352 = 9-5 kips
, 384EI = (384)3(10) 36.3 , 1 3 l44 L3
^
38
kips/ft
(6.67)
7-22J
R,
EM
15 Jan 58
= 0.0097 ft
R m
k
ep
iSMp
"IT
5L
vei
T.lf
'352 = 12.9 kips
- 384EI =
^f iK
ê
= 196 kips/ft
ep
0.0057
).027 ft
Plastic range:
R m
weight = 12.9 kips

=
Maximum Deflection
5y E
General
Rm-12.9
=
i
= 781 35? (98o)
980
1
kips/ft
781 kips/ft
96
kips/ft
0.0097ft 0.0165ft 0.027 ft

y y E .p
Deflection, y(ft)
ym =
= 5(0.0165) = 0.0825 ft
0.02C6 sec
The basic equation for the numerical
Figure 7.24.
Resistance function for 3-3/4-in. slab spanning 6.67ft
integration in table 7-3 is:
n
-
5-3)
H )(0.0017l) n
(Pn -
R)(0. 00171)' n
R
2
0.77(0.0109)
(Pn
= 3.1*8(10
)(Pn
elastic range n ) ft,

ft, elasto-
n )(0. 00171) 0.78(0.0109)

-
plastic range)
h. 4
)(0. 00171)
o.66-(0.0109 )
^^4(lO-
)(Pn - Rn ) ft,, plastic range
39
EM
15 Jan 58
Table
7.3.
7-22k
Determination of Maximum Deflection and Dynamic Reactions for Roof Slab

(par. 5-08).
The value used is t /4-0 "because the incident overpressure
data is presented in terms of t
(EM 1110-3^5-^13).
values for the second column are obtained from figure 7.8, multiplying by
]M(6.67)/1000 = 0.96.
in table 7-3 is 0,03 ft which The maxim-urn deflection (y ) n max computed
is less than the allowable
of 0.08 ft.
This is satisfactory because
thin slabs
sire
very sensitive.
Note the variation in
and
in the
two trials (pars. 7-22e and h).

= 1.8; OK
k.
Shear Strength and Bond Stress.
kips (table 7-3) max For no shear reinforcement

+ 5000p
(eg.
=6.02
Allowable v
7-221
EM mo-3lj-5-4l7 15 Jan 58
= 0.(A(3000) + 5000(0.016) = 120 + 80 = 200 psi
=
8V = 8(6020) = 2 9 PS Tbd 7(12) (2. 75)
Slightly overstressed, OK to use

=
Qv
7SDci
8(6020) 7C5.7J2.75
'
psi
Allowable u = 0.15f = 0.15(3000) = 450 psi; OK C 1. Summary.
3-3A-in. slab, #3 at 2-1/2 in,

p = 0.016
No shear reinforcement
7-23
DESIGN OF ROOF PURLINS.
The purlins are framed flush with the tops
of the girders and are provided with moment -resist ing connections.
Connec-
tions attached to the top flanges of the purlins are embedded in the con-
crete slab to provide lateral support to the top compression flange and to
prevent separation of slab from purlin in reversals.

<B
Although composite behavior of the slab and purlin can be expected to

develop to a limited extent, preliminary computations showed that design
for independent behavior of slab and purlin is more desirable for this ar-
rangement of members (pars. ^-12 and 6-23).

The purlins are designed for plastic behavior so that hinges are con-
sidered to develop at midspan and at the supports.

dures of this manual only single-
In the design proce-
span elements can be handled.

Therefore, the continuity of the
-f
purlins is accounted for approxi-
mately by designing interior purlins as fixed- end beams spanning

L
=
18.0'
18 ft between girder center lines
Depending on the exterior support condition the exterior purlins are deIn this example a signed as fixed-pinned beams or as fixed-fixed beams.
typical interior purlin is designed. be Tfo present a complete picture of the loads that need a Loading. considered acting on purlins, two directions for the blast wave are consid*
ered (par. 3-09).
EM
15 Jan 58
For the blast wave moving normal to the long axis of the building and thus normal to the axis of the purlin, the loading may be considered to be
uniformly distributed along the length of the purlin. For this condition the pressure vs time variation at each point along the roof is a function of its position (par. 3-09). In addition the load on a purlin is a func-
tion of the length of the slab spans because the load on the purlin builds up to a maximum value in the time required for the blast wave to traverse
the two adjoining slabs.
In the preliminary design of the purlins the de-
sign load is the simplest form of the roof load obtained from the incident
overpressure vs time curve.
The rise time, slab dynamic reactions, and
local variation are all neglected in this preliminary step. For the blast wave moving parallel to the long axis of the building
and thus parallel to the axis of the purlin, the load varies along the span as a result of the time required for the blast wave to traverse the purlin
span.
At any point along the purlin the time variation of the load is the
same and defined by the incident overpressure vs time curve.
In the calculations that follow the load vs time curves for the pur-
lin are obtained first for the blast wave moving parallel to the long axis
of the building and then for the blast wave moving parallel to the short
axis of the building.

Face
of
Front Wall
FGCC
of
Rear waii
purlin obtained by the
preliminary design procedure is

analyzed for both loads in
tables 7-5,
76, and
7-7-
Blast wave moving perpendicular to

the long axis of the building:
From the procedure of paragraph 3-09d the data for point (A) at purlin (A) are:
*a
'
BT
'
m| '
006
v =
-
J0.042
+ (0.108) =88.1 fps 557^] 1403

sec
*m
T - BB7I - '*
)
ffl
0.5(t d + t
= 0.5(0.006 +0.096) = 0.051 sec
42
7-23a
EM 1110-345-417 15 Jan 58
15 = 0.096 + 15
0.266 sec
-I-
-l)
Mils value must
1 = -1.2
be>0j
it is therefore taken as zero.
The resulting variations in the ratio of local roof overpressure to incident overpressure for "both points (A) and (B) are plotted in figure The calculations for point (B) are not shovn but are similar to 7.15-
those for point (A).
By combining figure 7.15 and the incident overpressure curve (fig. 7.8) the variation of local roof overpressure with time is determined (fig.
7.16) for points (A) and (B).
The calculations of local roof overpressure
for point (A) are contained in table 7 A.
The calculations of data for
point (B) are not shorn.

Table
7.4.
Computation of Local Roof Overpressure at Point (A)
The roof slab is analyzed in table 7.5 for both local overpressure vs
time curves presented in figure 7.l6.
The analysis in table 7.5 is based
EM 1110-3^5-^17
15 Jan 58
00
CD
S
<fr
CJ
6
01
6
d
CD
TooJd
ajnssdJdJdAO jooy JDOOI
EM
15 Jan 58
o
ex
I
CO
O O
O O
(isd)*
OOJ
EM 1110-345-417
15 Jan 58
Table
7.5.
7-23a
Determination of Dynamic Reactions for Roof Slab, Loral Roof Overpressure at Purlins (A) and (B)
Purlin (A)
E
(kips)
(kips)
(ft)
0.62
-3.40 -1.50
+0.00030 0.00175 0.00030 0.00268 0.00235 0.00120 0.00708 -0.00034 0.01301 -0.00088 0.01860 -0.00134 0.02331 -0.00168 0.02668 -0.00206 0.02837 -0.00162 0.02800 -0.00071 0.02601 0.02331
6.24
0.068
2.06
From t = 0.020 the values of V
are equal to 0-50P
46
7-23a
EM 1110-3^5-417 15 Jan 58
on the following data developed in paragraph 7-22J and the resistance diagram for the roof slab (fig.
Elastic range:
Yn (At)
2 2
= 3.^(lO""^)(P = 3^39(lO""^)(P
R
-
ft
Plastic range:
yn (At)
n)
)
ft
ft
^(At)
k.06k(0)(P
The object of this computation is to determine the slab dynamic reactions on the purlins.
The maximum response of the slab to these loads occurs before there
is any difference between the loads at (A) and (B), thus the dynamic reac-
tions of the slabs at purlins (A) and (B) are the same -until the dynamic
reactions are based on the applied load
above.
The last two columns of
table 7-5 show the applied load and the dynamic reactions at purlin (B).
To obtain the design load for purlins (A) and (B) the dynamic reac-
tion data from table 7.5 are plotted in figure 7.17.
The total purlin load
is equal to the sum of the reactions of the slabs forward and aft of the
purlin.
In figure 717> it may be seen that the same dynamic reactions are
plotted with a time lag

t
= lag
f 1403
O.OOW
sec
The loads from figure 7.17 are used in tables 7.6 and 7.7 (par. 7-23J) to
check the preliminary purlin design.

Blast wave moving parallel to the long axis of the building:
The design load on the purlin is determined in figure 7-17a using the slab dynamic reactions obtained in table 7-3 for incident overpressure. The variation of the average load on the purlin with time is found by
plotting the same dynamic reaction curve with a time lag

=
-
0128 sec
The variation in slab dynamic reaction with time is the same at each point
along the purlin.
The load curve from figure 7-l?a is used in table 7-8
to check the preliminary purlin design.
Preliminary design:
For preliminary design it is desirable to use a simple load-time
EM
15 Jan 58
OCOI^-tOlO^ftOCVJ
poo~i u6|S9Q puo
suoipoay oiuuouAQ qo|g
7-23a
EM
15 Jan 58
O o
O Q o
ro
Q.
o
5
XI
o O 6
CVJ
<u
ex
o
c
o>
I*.
.o
CL
CL?
:CO:
XI
o*
;
O O 6
.>
UJ
^~
a
;
O:
00
CD
CM
oiiuDuAg qois a6ojaAV PUD 10001
7-23*)
EM 1110-3^5-^17
15 Jan 58
curve.
loading shown by The design load as idealized from the computed
^ 9
figure 7.8 is defined by

(18) . 173
Time (sec)
_ IT = (173)0-38 = 32 ^ 9 kip. sec (par. 6-11 ) 2 2
b.
(Refer to table 6.1.
Elastic range:
K, = 0.53,
= 0.77
= 0.36R + O.lto,
= 0.50,
38UEI
= 0.39R + 0.1XP
Plastic range:
KL
= 0.50,
8,
KM
- o-33,
KIM
0.66
V = 0.38Rm + 0.32P
Average values:
KL^
- 0.57 o.5(o.6U +0,50)
= 0.5(0.50 +0.33)
= 0.5(0.78
=0^2
+0.77) =0-77
0TEI
c.
TLrat Trial
^tual Properties.
****'**
7-
23d
EM 1110-3^5-417
15 Jan 58
Let
6 (par. 6-26)
Assume C
(experience) R R = C B = 1.0(173) - 173 kips m R

= 1.05Sf
= 1.0
dy
173,
3.51,3
(s
.'.
s = 53-5
Try 16
S = 56.3 in. 3 ,
/
\
6U in. 3 ,
1'6
3 0.5(8 + Z) = 60.1 in. ,
I = JA6 in.^
Mp
= f
iy
l^T^)
15 18
i|'
1^
= 203 kip-ft
(eq. fc.2)
16M
P ~ 16(208) _ = "
^^
kips
/ft
(307)30(lO) 3j^6
185 -
-0378 ft
ym
= 6(0.0378) = 0.2268 ft (par. 6-26)
ups
Jfass
m =
= 0.217 kip-sec 2 /ft

-
d.
First Trial
=
me
Vm
-57(l85) = 105-5 kips (eq 6.12)

(eq.
He m
e
KjH
0.57(32.9) = 18.75 kip-sec
6.2)
(eq.
=
2 (H )^ e _ - (1875) ~ 2m 2(0.091)
2 0.091 kip-sec /ft
6.18)
W " W P
T = n
e.
0.0368 sec
Work Done vs Energy Absorption Capacity. = T/T = 0.38/0.0368 = 10.3
C^
= R /B = 185/173 = 1-07 (eqs 6.15, m
= 0.12 (fig. 5.29)

51
EM 1110-3^5-lU7
15 Jan 58
t
7-23f
= (0.12)0.38 =
0.0*1-55
sec
0.0*1-5
Idealized load-time curve is satisfactory at t =

G
(par. 5-13
= 0.008 (fig. 5.27)
WE
= C
s 0.008(1930) = 15. 4 ft-kips

)
(eq.
6.1?)
E = R
2ne
(ym - o.5y
= 105*5 [0.2268
0.5(0.0378)]
* 22.0 ft-kips
(eq.
6.18)
E >
W,
therefore the selected proportions are satisfactory as a pre-
liminary design.
Try to "bring
f.
closer to
-
"by
smother trial that follows,
Second !rial
Actual Properties.
0.75(22.0)
(0.57)[0*2268
-
"
a
uo;
= 172 kips(eq. 6.1<
0.5(0.0378)]
Since R
=172**
173 from first trial, try
0,57(0.208)
158,
S =
W.5
= 339-2
Try Ik
S =
W.5
= f
in*
3
,
3 Z = 5^-5 In- ,
3 0.5(S + Z) = 51-5 in. ,
in
"p
^
dy
P
Z) * ^ 1<6
i2
1>? ^ = 178
^P-"
(e ^ ^ e2)
16M
R
v
^(178)
_ 153 1:ipc 3
= 30711 . 3Q7(30)10
(3392)
= 3?20 kips/f t
ym = Q
g.
y^ = 6(o.(A-27) = 0.2562 (par.

Juj
626)
Second Trial
= ~
=
me
e
= 0.57(159) = 90,5 kips (eq 6.12)
Tr
0.57(3720) = 2120 kips/ft
(eq.
6.6)
He =
m
=
= 0.57(32.9) = 18.75 kip-sec (ec[6.2) 2 = OA2(0.217) = 0.091 kip-sec /ft (eq. 6.8)
52
7-2311
EM 1110-345-417 15 Jan 58
2
P
6.28-^0.77(0.217)/3720
0.042 sec
T/T
C
G
= 0.38/0.042 = 9.05
R W m
= R
m/
B =
^/TO
=0.92
= 0.022
= 0.022(1930) = 42. 5 j too large, use initial trial 16

Preliminary" Design for Shear Stress.
= 0.5R = 0.5(185) = 92.5 kips ' 19 ' 500 psi
i.
Estimated V
Allomble v
j.
= 21,000 psi; OK (par. i--05c)
Determination of Meucimum Deflection and Dynamic Reactions by
Numerical Integration,
16
^36,
3 S = 56.3 in. ,
Z = 6h in. 3 ,
3 0.5(S + Z) = 60.1 in, , I =
1^
in.
Mp
= 208 kip-ft
Weight
=7-0
kips
Mass m
= 0..21? kip-sec /ft
Elastic range:
-
08 veight = ^(jj )
7-0 . 132.0 kips
384EI = (38^)30(10
)^
I8 3
. 6130
(l44)
Rm =
_Z
Jj
weight =
= l
-to
7-0 = 178.0 kips
ki
= 1226 kips/ft
53
EM 1110-345-1H7
15 Jan 58
7-23J
- R.
-7+-V- 32 - 0.0215 ep
Plastic range:
021 5 + 0.0375 = 0.059 ft
0.2178
The basic equation for the
numerical integration in tables 7.6,

Deflection,
y (ft)
7.7, and 7-8 is

Figure 7.1 8.
Resistance function for

ft
2 yn + x = yÂt) +
16 IP 36 purlin spanning 18
2yEL
yn
-L
(table 5-3) where
Table
7.6.
Determination of Maximum Deflection and Dynamic Reactions for Purlin (A)
(Zone 3 Local Roof Overpressure)
7-233
EM 1110-31*5417 15 Jan 58
Table 7.7.
Determination of Maximum Deflection and Dynamic Reactions for Purlin (B) (Zone 3 Local Roof Overpressure)
Table
7,8.
Determination of Maximum Deflection and Dynamic Reactions for any Purlin (Incident Overpressure)
55
EM
15 Jan 58
7-23k
(pn -
0.77(0.21?)
<
a 5.386(lO~ 5 )(F n
6
)
elastic range R^) ft,
n-
)9(10-
Q, 7B(S217)
- 5.317<3Xf >)(P n 6
)
n)
ft,
elasto-plastic range
= 6.28MlO~ )(P - R ) ft, plastic range 0.^6(0.217) The time interval At = 0.003 sec is approximately T /10 =0.00368 sec
(par. 5-08).
)9(io-
Die dynamic reaction equations are listed in paragraph 7-23b.
The
values for tables 1.6 and 7*7j second column, are obtained from figure
7-1-7;
multiplying by 18 to account for

the P
tlie length,
of the purlin.
For table 7-8
values in the second column are obtained from figure
717a multiply-
ing by 2 x 18 = 36 to account for the two slabs loading the purlin. The maximum deflection (y ) computed in table 7-7 is 0.252 ft. 252 = 6.9 > 6. This is satisfactory for this purpose. All Thus Op =
'
--
other purlins are less critical.

k.
Shear Stress Check.

= 9
*
Vmax
v
8 kipfl
tables
and
19,200 psi
),8QO
dt
15.85(0.299)
Allowable v = 21,000 psij OK (par. 4-C

1.
Check Proportions for Local

(par. lj-06d)
Buckling,
16
^36,
b = 6.992,
t
= 0.^28,
a = 15.0,
= 0.299
b/t f = 6.99/0.428 = 16.4 > 14. 0, OK;

slab provides support
a/t
= 15*0/0.299 = 50.2 > 30, NG; longi-
tudinal stiffeners required

t_ = 3/8 > 0.299, OK s
b /t s' s
6t Q = 6(3/8) s
=:
2.25 in.
7-24
EM 1110-345-417 15 Jan 58
Use two plates 3/8 in. by
c/tv = (5-25
2-1/lj.
in. full length.
0.l4-3)/0.299 = 16
-
<
22; OK'
e/t v = (10.25
0.43)/0.299 = 32.8 < 40; OK
7-2k
PREIIMIMRY DESIGN OF COIIMTS.
A single-story frame
subject to lat-
eral load behaves essentially as a
s ingle -degree-of -freedom
system with the
columns displaying the. spring properties.
It is therefore unnecessary to
substitute an equivalent system for the original structure and the mass and
load factors -which are necessary in the design of beams and slabs are not
used in the design of single-story frames.

The preliminary plastic de-
sign procedure of paragraph 6-11

is the basis for determining the
preliminary column size.
The
equations of paragraph 7-06 axe

incorporated into the procedure
of paragraph 6-11 replacing some of the factors that are used to determine
e quivalent systems .
For purposes of preliminary design the frame girders are assumed to be infinitely rigid thus simplifying the determination of the column spring constant. For spring constant computation the effective column height h
is 16 ft based on an assumed girder- depth of 3 ft and a clear height h c The clear height is used in determining the resistance of the lU.5 ft.
of
columns (par. 7-06).
In the preliminary design of steel columns it is desirable that the the frame as an energy absorption capacity be greater than the work done on
allowance for the factors which are neglected.
These factors are:
(l) the
lateffect of direct stress on the plastic hinge moment, (2) the effect of eral deflection of the column on its resistance, and (3) the effect of
girder flexibility.
The design lateral load on the frame is obtained for from the dynamic reactions at the top of the front wall slab. However, to use the net lateral preliminary design computations, it is satisfactory
a.
Design Loading.
overpressure curve (fig. 7ll) the frame The net lateral load is assumed to be reacted equally by
57
EH
15 Jan 58
and the foundation.
This results in a conservative load for the frame
since the dynamic reaction equations for the -wall slab (par. 7-21b) result
in footing reactions that are larger than the roof reactions.

8
=
595
kips
loading as shown by figure Toll is defined by
B = 25.3 psi =
j^
^=595 kip
T = 0.062 sec
T = 0.062 sec
Time
(sec)
w *
Mass Computation.
_ ~
BT _ 595<Q062) ~
2
b.
T-
- 1^0 )18(2 )17* 5 walls 11( ipnoooi
Q/r =000
r-
kips
-
j^_
Slab and roofing
P ^2
= 5-3
-f
6.0J
IQQQ
la -
li-
kiP s
Girder (estimate)
^QQ
1^4-0 C
= 6-5 kips
Connections (allov 10$) = 0.1(5-3

Columns (estimate)
^
1 1^"
+6.5) =1-2 kips

kips
TOOO
5 "
'
/*
Mass of single-degree-of -freedom system = total roof + 1/3 (columns

and valis) 2 85.2 -2<ft klp . sec /r
$c.*c-
JUA + 5.3 m =
c.
H-
6.5 + 1.2 + 0.33(86.5 32.2

-
H-
6.1)
First Trial
Actual Properties.
Let ap = 12 (par. 6-26)
Assume C
= 0.5 (experience)
= 0.5(595) = ^97 kips
C,,B R
= 1.05Sf
= dy
1-
051
6) S = 3- 64S kip-ft (S in in. 3
)(eq. 4.
= (2nMD )/h = [2(3)3. 6Us]/lô5 = 1 -51S = 297, .. S = 197 in. c is 14 IF 136 Smallest column that satisfies buckling criteria
yy\
Jt
x*
(par. *4~06d)
3 3 - 1593 S = 216.0 in. , Z = 2^2.7 in. , I
-in.
,
0.5(S + Z) = 229-3
58
EM 1110-3^5-417 15 Jan 58
= 12.63/0.66 = 19.2 < 22; OK a/t^ b/t f = 14.7V 1 - ^3 = 13-9 < 1^.0; OK (par. 4-06d)
M
m
k =
= 0.5(8
- 2(3)795 ~ . 12(30)103(1593)3 =
12(0.113) = 1-35 ft
= 6.28^2.611/2910 = 0.189 sec
d.
First !Erial
T/T
C
= 0.062/0.189 = 0.328
= 328/595 = 0.55 R =RyB t /T = 1.3, t = 1.3(0.062) = 0.0805 (fig. 5.29) m m
The original load-time curve should be revised to obtain a closer ap-
proximation to the total impulse up to time t

to t
(par. 5-13)-
Kie impulse up
0.09 sec in figure 7.11 is
H = 1.00 psi-sec (obtained by graphical integration)

T = 2H/B = 2(l.O)/25-3 = 0.079 sec
T/T
= 0.079/0.188 = OA2 = 1.2, t = 1.2(0.079) = 0.095 (fig- 5-29) m
t^T
Try again for impulse up to t = 0.10 sec, H = 1.026
T = 2(l.026)/25.3 = 0.081 sec

T/T
= 0.081/0.189 =
OA3
t = 0.10; OK (fig. 5-29)
t /T = 1.2- t = 1.2(0.081) = 0.097 * m nr

C
= 0.71 (fig- 5-27) =
..
"p
25
=
V"SV
'
8(2.61)-)
Wm
= C
W W P
=
-
-7l(m)
= 78.7 ft-kips
E = Rm m (x
= 328 [1.35 - 0.5(0.113)] - ^6 ft-kips ^r) This column section (ik VF136) is more than ample. Try to use a 59
smaller column size.

\
EM 1110-3^5-^17
15 Jan 58
e.
l-2ke
1
Second Trial
-
Actual Properties.
+E)
_ -
0.5(78.7+426) _ 25g_ _ 187 " ~ 7

1.35
1.35
T?
- 2(3)3.645 ~
14.5
'
'
* '
Try 12 >F92 to satisfy buckling criteria (par.

S ='125-0 in. a/t
3
,
i|~(A-d).
3 + Z) = 127*5 in.
Z = 130.0 in. 3 , I = 788.9
ln.\ 0.5(8
10.91/0.5^5 = 20 < 22
lU.O; OK
'
b/t f = 12.155/0.856 = 1*K2
- 0.5(8 + Zjf
127>1
- 1A1 kip-ft
12(30 )10 (788. 9 )3 = lIAo
Mps/ft
=
g
R^k
= 182/lUUO = 0.126 ft
x
T
f
.
= op x =
= 12(0.126) = 1.52 ft
= 0.268 sec = 6.28^/2.6^/1^0 2jrym/k Second Trial - ork Done vs Energy Absorption Capacity.
= 0.08l/0o268 = 0.302
T/T
C t
=R
Vl
0.306 /B = 182/595 = 1.8, t = 1.8(0.08l) =

ffi
O.lW
sec (fig.
5-29)
Revise the load-time curve as above (par. 5-13)

= 1.196 psi-sec Impulse up to t = 0.18 sec in figure 7.11 is H
T = 2H/B = 2(1. 196)/25. 3 = 0-09^ sec
T/T
= Oo09^/0.268 = 0.351
t /T = 1.8, t = 1.8(0.09^) = 0.17 sec; OK (fig. 5-29) m m = 0.82 (fig. 5-27) C w O O P P f CT\C \ -r\ r\s*\]i rff/TirnX TJ /Pm
'
P""2m~\2y'
W
ID.
= CJHL = 0.82(1^9) = 122 ft-kips W

JL
60
7-2%
This column section is ample.
the size further.
g.
EM 1110-345-417
15 Jan 58
Another trial may be made to reduce
Third Trial
Actual Properties.
2nM
Jl
'-
P _ 2(3)3.64(3) = 41.
'
.-
JL.lO
.
.
14.5
_ Op O = 8 HI. 3
!3iy
10
^77, S
,
86.1 in. 3 , Z = 97.6 in* 3 , 0-5(S + Z) = 91.8 in. 3 ,
I = ^57-2 in.
= 22.67 in-
a/t w - 8.89/0.535 = 16.6 < 22; OK b/t = 10.195/0.868 = 11-75 < 1^.0; OK
f
M.,
= 0.5(8 + Z)f .
?l8(Ul.6) = 3lQ
^p^t
^ k =
h
x
=
e
]
= 12(30)10^(^57.2)3 = 835
= 131/835 = 0. 157
==
= ap x = I2x = 12(0.157) e e =
2it>/5m7k
1.88 ft
T
h.
6.28^2.64/835 = 0.353 sec Third Trial - Work Done vs Energy Absorption Capacity.
=
T/Tn = 0.094/0.353 = 0.27 = R /B = 131/595 = 0.22 C^

ffl
t /T = 2.5, tm = 2.5(0.094) . 0.235 sec (fig. 5.29) m
Revise the load-time curve as above (par. 5-13)Impulse up to time = 0.25 sec is 1.30 psi-sec (fig. 7-ll) T = 2H/B = 2(l.30)/25-3 = 0.103 sec
T/T
- 0.103/0.353 = 0.292
= 0.257 sec; OK t /T = 2.5 (fig. 5-29), tm = 2.5(0.103) m

C
= 0.88 (fig. 5-26)
f/61
EM 1110-3^5-417
15 Jan 58
7-241
" C
W = W P
-
O- 88
^)
-
= 157 ft-kips
'
= 236 ft-kips
gj
E = K
m (xm
5
-g )
131(1-88
^S
This size is accepted for preliminary design.
As noted above it is
desirable to have
exceed
"because of the approximations in the pre-
liminary design procedure.

i.
Shear Stress Check of 10 VF77.

n
Estimated V
v -
= -~ =
,
^^ =
- 7700 ~ 77
Mps
in one
coli:iIDn
JL Fd
0.535(10-62)
Allowable v = 21,000 psi (par. 4-05c); OK

j.
Slenderness Criterion for Beam Columns.
(See pax. ^-08.
An
ap-
proximate evaluation of the column slender ness criterion is made "before the
column size is accepted for final analysis.
The criterion is:
318 kip-ft
(318)
212 kip-ft (a rough estimate)
P = f p
= lH.6(22.67) = 9^5 kips

sec (fig .
K' =
O.llf-
(tatle IK!)
K" = 0.50 (table lv.2)
L = 1^.5 ft (clear height)

r = 2.60 in.,
b = 10.195 in.,
= 0.868 in.,
d = 10.62
in.
Siibstituting gives
TO.
14(1^.5 )12(10.62)"| L 100(10.195)0.868 J
/132\ [0. 5(1^. \W?) 1 15(2.60

1.0;
- 0.196 + 0.329 =0.53
<
OK
7-25
EM 1110-345-417
15 Jan 58
7-25
DESIGN OF ROOF GIRDER.
The girders are rolled structural steel
shapes continuous over two spans.
Since the procedures of this manual con-
sider only single-span elements, the girders are designed for
vertical loads as
"beams fixed at
the interior support and pinned
at the exterior support.
The
vertical loads are of two kinds;

uniformly distributed load due
to the girder dead weight and two concentrated loads, static plus blast applied by the purlins at the girder third-points.
The design moment at the interior support is a combination of three
superposed bending moments as follows:

(1) The moment caused by the static loads; (2) The moment caused by the vertical blast loads; and
(3) The moment imposed by the central column in restraining lateral motion of the frame.
The girder is designed for elastic behavior so that at all times it
will be capable of providing the full restraint equal to the column plastic
moment at each column support.
For this two-span girder the column moment
in the girder is equal to one-half the plastic hinge moment of the column
(par. 7-11)-
The basic design procedure is essentially the same as the elastic de-
sign procedure illustrated in paragraph 6-12.
Although this is an elastic
design, the limiting moment is the plastic resisting moment of the section
(par. Ij-CA-b).
The preliminary design load is based on an idealized version of the
purlin dynamic reactions.
After obtaining a satisfactory preliminary de-
sign the actual average purlin dynamic reaction is used in a numerical in-
tegration analysis to verify the preliminary design.

a.
Loading.
The critical girder loading results from the blast wave
moving parallel to the girder axis.
For this condition the average roof
loads vary along the axis perpendicular to the girder from a maximum at the
ends to a minimum over the central portion of the roof (par. 3-08d).
To
EM 1110-3^-5-^17
15 Jan 58
r
,
obtain the vertical blast load on the girder it is necessary to determine:

(1) The variation of Zone 3 local overpressure; (2) The slab dynamic reactions for these overpressures; and (3) The purlin dynamic reactions -when loaded
by the slab dynamic
reactions.
All this has been done in paragraph 7-23 in designing the purlins.
The girder dynamic load is determined in figure 7.19 by adding the dynamic
reactions of purlins (A) and (B) plotted with, the proper lag time
t
lag
purlin spacing ^ 6.67 = Q QokQ sec velocity of blast wave 1403
The dynamic reactions are obtained from tables 7-6 and 7-7 (par. 7-233)The design load as idealized from the computed loading shown by figure 7-19
B
=
356
kips
is defined by:
B = M89) = 356 kips

T
T>
= 0.016 sec
"b.
=0.016 sec
Elastic Range Dynamic Design Factors.
Time (sec)
Concentrated mass:
0-67,
KIM
0.83
*V-L
= 0.17R + 0.17P/
V2 = 0.33R + 0.33P
= 0.^5,
-
Uniform mass:
IN
K^
c.
= 0.8l,
K^
IM
'
83
Mass Computation.
fa. 75(150)
Slab and roofing
12
;o
. 20.7 kips
Girder (estimate)
Connections (allow 10$) = 0.1(3-2 + 1-5)
3-2 kips
0.17kips
6k
7-2513
EM 1110-345-^17
15 Jan 58
O o u. > o < o
*
o
N
^C
"5 "h
to;
q 6
"8
ro
13
Q.
cu k.
o o
o
CD
O
OJ
puo
|DDO~I
65
EM 1116-345-417
15 Jan 58
g
=
.
Total concentrated mass m

= 0.475 kip-sec 2/ft
(g
/3)(20.7) + (1.5) = 15-3 32.2 32.2
'
Total uniform mass m = u

d-
= 0.115 kip-sec 2/ft
First Trial
Actual Properties.
Assume D.L.F. =1.4 (experience) R = D.L.F.(B) = 1.4(356) = 500 kips
(par. 6-11)
= 1.05Sf dy
- 500,. '.
3=458
in.3
Try 36 ^150,
S = 503 in. 3 ,
Z = 581 in. 3 ,
3 0-5(S + Z) = 5^2 in. ,
I = 9012
= f
0.5(S + Z)
3
= 1880 kip-ft (eq 4.
. 132(30)10 (9012) =
Qoo
/ft
1
e.
First Erial
e
Equivalent Properties.
2
= 0.67(0.^75) = 0.318 kip-sec /ft l^(mc ) = 0.^5(0.115) = 0.052 kip-sec 2 m = Uniform /ft e ^(\) Total m = 0.318 + 0.052 = 0.37 kipsec 2/ft e k = iLk = 0.81(30,800) = 25,000 kips/ft
=
Concentrated m
6.28^/0.37/25,000
= 0.02lfl sec
Tr /Tn
= 0.036/0.02U1 = 0.665
D.L.F. = 1.^5 (fig. 5.21)
Required Rm = D.L.F. (B) = 1.45(356) = 516 kips Required Mp = RmL/6 = 5l6(20)/6 = 1720 kip-ft
for column = 0.5(318) = 159 kip-ft (pars. 7-12 and 7-21g) 0.5Mp Moment in girder at interior support due to static loads
M^
= 3-7(20)/8 + 15-3(0. 33)(0.67)(6. 67 + 20)0.25 +
15.3(0.33)(0.67)(133 + 20)0.25 = 9-25 + 22.7 + 28.3 = 60 kip-ft
Girder resistance available for vertical blast loads
= 1880
60
159 = 1660 kip-ft < 1720 kip-ft
Consider larger sizes

66
7-25*
EM 1110-3^5-417 15 Jan 58
f.
Second Tirlal
in.
Actual Properties.
Try 36
I
1*
S = = f
Z = 622 in. 3 ,
3 0.5(S + Z) = 58! in. ,
.=
9739 in.
0.5(3 + Z) = 41.6(581) = 2020 kip-ft

132(30 )10
2Cr
5
132EI
3
(
9739) . 3
(l0
kips/ft
The change in the mass is
go
Second Trial
neglected-
= K-k = 0.81(33,300) = 27,000 kips/ft

=
6,28^0.37/27,000
= 0.0232 sec
T /T
0l6/0.0232 = 0.69
i
D.L.F. = 1.38 (fig.
Required Rm = D.L.F.(B) = 1*38(356) = ^91 kips

Required M = RmL/6
M_
.=
^9l(20)/6 = l6kQ kip-ft

= 2020 - 60 - 159 = 1800 kip-ft ; OK
-,
Girder resistance available for vertical blast loads
Ms
0.5(Mp)
t /T = 1.19 (figm p t
ho
5-21)
= OoOl6(l.l9) = 0.019 sec; OK
Preliminary Design for Shear Stress.

= 0.019 sec, t = 0.019
-f
At t
0.00*4-8
= 0,0238 sec
P = ^(89) = 356 kips (fig. 7-19)
V = 0.33R
t d
-i-
0-33P = 0.33(^91
280, OOP
Hh
356) = 280 kips
0^53(36.0)
= 11,700 psi
Rm
=
540
Allowable v = 21,000 psi (par.

i.
Determination of Maximum Deflec-
=
=
33,300 kips /ft
ye
O.OI62
ft
tion and Dynamic Reactions by Numerical

Integration.
m
1=
L Rm
"
Deflection,
(ft)
20
Figure 7.20. Resistance function for 160 girder spanning 20 ft, 36 fixed at one end and pinned
33,300 kips/ft
= 0.0162 ft
33,300 67
at the other
EM
15
7-25J
Jan 58
Table
7.9.
Determination of Maximum Deflection and Dynamic Reactions for Roof Girder
The basic equation for the numerical integration in table 7.9 is
n
vhere
p -
R )(Atr n
)
AJL'l
R )(0.002)' n (0.55X0.115) + (OTB3X0.575)

^ y
-P4I Tj
Av^vin"" ^ A J_U
(J
.
(
f ^Jr
T? n
The time interval At = 0.002 sec is approximately equal to T /10 = 0.00232

sec (par.
5-08).
The dynamic reaction equations are listed in paragraph
7-25b.
The P
values for the second column in table 7.9 are obtained from
figure 7*19 multiplying by 4 to obtain the total concentrated load applied

to the girder by the two purlins.
j
.
Shear Stress Check.

= 286 kips (table 7-9)
v -
_ -
286,000
3.0(0.53
Allowable v = 21,000 psi; OK (par.

68
7 " 25k
EM 1110-345-417
15 Jan 58
k.
Check Proportions of 36
Wl6p
OK
for Local Buckling.
b/t f = 12.0/1.02 = 11.8 = 33.96/0.653 = 52 a/t^

(see par. 4-06d)
t
b
fl
<
>
14;
30; NG,
longitudinal stiffeners required

1.02"
= 3/4 > 0.653; OK
/t a = 6; b
= 6t
= 6(3/4) = 4.5 in.
Use longitudinal stiff eners, 2 plates 3/4 in. by 4-1/2 in. by full length.
--
c/t^
10.73/0.653 = 16.5 < 22; OK
e/tv = 22.54/0.653 = 34.5 < 40; OK
Weight of added plate stiffeners
equals 23 Ib/ft.
7-26
7-24.
FINAL DESIGN OF COLUMN.
The column design was begun in paragraph
The final steps in the column design are illustrated by this paraThe steps which follow are preliminary to the numerical analysis to
In the pre-
graph.
determine the lateral deflection of the top of the columns.
liminary design (par. 7-24) some of the factors which affect the response
are neglected to simplify the computations.
In this paragraph these fac-
tors are considered:
the variation of plastic hinge moment with direct
stress, the variation of column resistance with lateral deflection, the ef-
fect of girder flexibility on the stiffness of the columns, and the difference between the load on the wall slab and the dynamic reactions from the
wall which are used as the lateral design load for the frame columns,
a.
Mass Computation.
(Refer to par. 7-24b.)
Walls =86.5 kips, roof slab = 4l.4 kips, purlins = 5-3 kips
Glrder =
Columns =
=6.5 kips
= 3-35 kips
Connections
=1.2
kips
Mass of single-degree-of -freedom system = total roof + 1/3 (columns
and walls)
M.U
+ 5.3
+6.5 +0.33(86.5
32.2
+ 3-35) = 83^2 = 32.2
2
/ffc
69
EM
1110-345-14-17
15 Jan 58
"b.
7-26b
Column Properties.
.*
10
S . 86.1 in. 3, z . 97 6 in .3^ 0> A = 22.67 in. , b = 10.195 = 0.868 in. in., t f a = 8.89 in., t = 0.535 In.,- d = 10.62 in. w C' C lump Interaction Design Data. The plastic hinge moment, plastic axial lo^d, and the values of and are computed belov from the column MI properties*
.
I = 457.2 in.*
- f
dy
(S + z)o. 5 =
'
(91.8) = 318 kip-ft
el 4.2)
P P
VV
4l 6 ( 22 6 7) = 945 kips (eq 4.7)

-
4.12)
=15^2
2(10.195 K0.868)
2
+ 0.535(10.62)
= 175 kips
_
2(o
P!
= 3.91 [15-4 + 30.2 - 0.80]
(12J3U0.62)
10.195(0.868) [3(10.62)
2
-
2 6(10.62)0.868 + 4(o.868) ]}
\
Ml
ûT
> P
P
<
l87 + 8 ' 8 5 [339 - 55.5 + 3.0]
(2727) = 296 kip-ft
For P
/ P
\
"P
" P
D\
~\
_
*^
945
^
*"
JL
P D
(
^P
TJ
u.
J /
For P
< P
P D
=Mp
o = 318
ir (Mp
(318
-
VLJ (eq4.i4)
296 )p
--^-
H = 318
0.125 PD
The relative flexibility of the in the elastic range from the value
d<
Sffect of Girder Flexibility.
girders reduces the spring constant
EM 1110-345-417
15 Jan 58
obtained in paragraph 7-24 for infinitely stiff girders (par. 7-08).
To
obtain this revised value of

made.
a simple sidesvay analysis of the frame is
From the sidesvay analysis the magnitude of the lateral force re-
quired to cause a unit displacement is determined.

In figure
722
the initial slope, -which is the proper spring constant
until formation of the first hinge, is assumed to hold up to the plastic

resistance R
.
The true resistance curve is represented approximately by

.
the dashed line up to R
For infinitely rigid girders k = 835 kips/ft (par. 7-24g).

The elastic sidesvay anal+ 365
!
k i ps
ysis in figure 7.21 is started
with -1000 kip-ft at top and
X
I
bottom of each column.
This
*i
E o
*28,6
is equivalent to a lateral
displacement of the frame,
-973
X = (F.E.M. )h /6EI
2 11A _ (1000)(16) 3 6(30)10 (^57.2)

= 0.1A8 ft
Figure 7.21.
Sidesway frame analysis by

distribution
moment
In the elastic sidesvay analysis

Idealized
Frame
0.414 (M
)
/Resistance
n
the conventional procedure of using

Variation Of
-"*C__ Approximate
Fram
k,
center line dimensions is adopted al-
Resistance
-
815 kips/ft
*&"
Deflection, y (ft
)
though in all other computations the clear height of the column is used.
=
2(9^6 + 973) +(999 + 998)

16
Figure 7.22. 10
IF
Resistance diagram for 77 columns
=365
815
e.
Loading.
Both horizontal and vertical loads are considered.
The
is obtained from lateral load for the numerical integration Fn (fig. 7-23) the numerical integration analysis of the V dynamic reaction column of The dynamic reaction the front mil slabs in paragraph 7-21* (table 7-2). the width of one bay. After values for a one-foot vidth are multiplied by
71
m 1110-3^5-1*17
15 Jan 58
7-26e
(sdi>|)
j 'pool
72
u6|S3a
7-26f
EM 1110-345-417 15 Jan 58
the dynamic reaction of the front vail slab has decreased to the level of the applied load (at t = 0.055 sec) the F values are determined from the
net lateral load c-urve
_.
(fig.-
7ll) vhere F^ = [l44(l8)9*06]/1000
net/
= 23*48 P is in psi). These data are plotted in figure 7.23 net kips (Pnet to give the frame lateral design load for use in table 7.10,
The effective height of the loaded area is obtained from one -half the
wall clear height plus the thickness of the roof slab^
h=^
f.
^15
= 9 .P6 ft
Computation of Deflection of Frame by Numerical Integration.

)
(Refer to table 7*10.
The total vertical load P
in the second column is
obtained by multiplying the average roof overpressure (fig. 7*12) by

[43-5(l8)l44]/1000 = 112,8 and adding the dead weight of the roof system.
The
(P-r.)
values are the average axial column loads and are obtained by
dividing the total vertical load by the number of columns.
The
(lO
from the
is used to
column is used in the plastic range to obtain the value of (ML)
interaction design equations (par* 7-26c).
The value of
(M)
)
obtain the maximum resistance at any time by the relation (R
R
range R
is equal to kx
= 8l5x
in the elastic range.
In the plastic
(
p x )/h indicates c n n the decrease in resistance corresponding to the increase in moment resultis the limiting value of
The expression
ing from the eccentric loading.
The basic equation for the numerical inte-
gration in table 7-10 is
where
m
(o. 02
2
)
x (At) n
k -Rn+ ^(x
L
n)
2^
J_
_ ]cl|. x
]_Q
IF
p^ i R + r (x n ) n h
I
is To check the slenderness criteria (par. U-08) the following equation
evaluated for each time interval.

73
EM 1110- 345
15 Jan 58
7-26f
Table 7.10.
Determination of Column Adequacy
s;[il^]
K
!
ir
11
[?]
1
<Kei*.io)
=hc
+ ^D
0.1^
= 0.50, L
= 14.5 ft = 17^ in. (tables k.l and 4.2)
^R f
Q 1^(17 ^)10.62 !
J
Mp [lOO(10.195)(Q.868)J
0.292
+ 2.231
P^
[0,5(17^)1 ^ , <X [15(2.60)]
The time interval At used in table 7-10 is based on the natural period
T = 2iry/^/k = 6.28^2.6/815 = 0.353. n T = 0.035 (par. 5-08) t = 0.02 <
The allowable maximum displacement
and 7-24c).
The computations in table 7-10 show that the slenderness cri--
terion is satisfied because the combined ratio is only very slightly

1-0 (0.3$)-
above
The computed maximum displacement
=1.56
ft, thus
(12) = 12.5; OK.
74
7-27a
EM 1110-345-417 15 Jan 58
FOUNDATION DESIGN,
a.
The foiuidation of this building is designed by both of the methods described in paragraph 6-31 primarily to.
illustrate the procedures.
The first design is according
7-2?
General.
to the Quasi-Static Foundation
Design Procedure in paragraph

6-31c, and the second is ac-
cording to the Dynamic Founda-
tion Design Procedure in paragraph 6-31d.
A preliminary
plan of one bay of the foundation is presented by figure

7-2^
.
Figure 7.24.
Preliminary foundation plan for one bay
b.
loads.
The first
req.uirem.ent of the quasi- static
analysis is a tabulation of all the lateral
and vertical loads on the foundation.

PD
Because each numerical integration
ft
'
-() \3/
"
.
PD
PD
performed previously is based
on a separate value of At, it

j
is necessary to plot curves of
() \O/
the variation of each of the
forces with time.
The loca-
tions of the forces on the
foundation are shown by the sketch on the left.
The vertical loads in-
clude the column and footing blast loads and the dead load of the entire
structure
Figure 7.25 is a curve showing the time variation of the total column
(blast plus static) load ?n = 3(PD ) n obtained from data in table 7-10. Figure 7.26 is a curve of the time variation of the blast load on the pro-
jecting front footing.
The front wall footing is estimated at 2 ft 6 in.
for the preliminary analysis so that the projecting area is p. 5 - 12)* 5 = 0.79 ft. The vertical blast load on the footing is obtained by multiplying the projecting area by the front face overpressure (fig. 7-9) thus
obtaining
0.79(18 )Pfront
front
75
EM
1110-3^5-^17
7-27b
15 Jan 58
Figure 7.27 is the total vertical load curve obtained
"by
adding the
ordinates of figures 7.25 and 7.26.
The blast load on the rear footing is
neglected herein.
0.02
0,04
Time,
t
0.06
(sec)
0,08
0.10
Figure
7.25.
Total column load vs time
76
7-27b
EM 1110-3U5-1H7
15 Jan 58
0,02
0.04
Time,
t
O.06
(sec)
0,08
0,10
Figure
7.26.
Vertical load on front wall footing projection vs time
77
EM
15 Jan
7-2?b
200
1000
800
Q.
.*
T3
600
O O o u
t 400 >
"o
^
h-
200
0.02
O.04
0,06
0.08
0.10
Time,t(sec)
Figure 7.27.
Total vertical load vs time
7-27b
EM 1110-345-417 15 Jan 58
The lateral loads include the shear in the columns and the front and
rear wall slab reactions at the vail footings. The rear wall slab reactions are obtained in table 7.11 by a numerical integration using the rear wall
overpressure data in figure 7.10 and the following data from paragraph 7 ~21g. 2.52 R n back
ft
=
0.090 ft
793 kips/ft
ep
kips/ft
= 45.6 kips
At = 0.005 sec
2
yn (At)
p
= 4.29(10
= 4.29(10
4
k
)(Pn - Rn ) ft, elastic range

)(Pn - Rn ) ft, elasto-plastic range
yn (At)
2
yn (At)
o
3r
s 5.07(10
= 5.07(10
4
h
)(Pn )(Pn -
R R
n ) ft, elasto-plastic range
n (At)
Table 7.11.
Determination of Dynamic Reactions for Back Wall Slab
79
EM
1110-3^5-14-17
7-2?b
15 Jan 58
Figure 7.28 is a plot of l8(Vr_n - V'_n ) vhere V .n and V' are, respectively. <s.n the front and rear wall slab footing reactions from tables 7.2 and 7-11-
After t = 0.07 sec, the curve is obtained from the net lateral load curve
(fig, 7*11):
net
viiere 17 5 is the -wall clear height.
The time variation of the column shear is plotted in figure 7-29
using data from table 7.10.
500
c:
4OO
~ s
8
E
"
O
(/>
E
\
CD
00
22.6 Pnet
0,02
0.04
Time,
t
0.06
(sec)
0.08
0,10
Figure 7.28.
Wall reactions at foundation vs time
80
EM
15 Jan 58
cs>
Q.
C
a:
en
e 3
"o
O
O
H-
0.02
0,04
Time,
0.06
t
0.08
0.10
(sec)
Figure 7.29.
Column shear vs time
Figure 7.30 indicates the total lateral load- time variation on the foundation and is obtained "by adding the ordinate values of figures 7-28
and 7*29.
81
EM 1110-3^5-417
15 Jan 58
500
O.02
O.O4
t
0.06
0.08
0.10
Time, (sec)
Figure 7.30.
Total lateral load on foundation vs time
Although not needed

table 7.10.
-until a later step> the time
variation of the
column "base moments is plotted in figure 7-31 using data obtained from
From t =
to t = 0.08 sec the columns are elastic so that
the moment from one column on the foundation is
II
<V
82
- 2
-^n
(M_.)
From t = 0.08 to 0.20 sec, the columns are plastic, hence
applies.
iEM
1110-345-417 15 Jan 58
300
(M D
)
(Table 7.10)
250
2-
200
o
CD
150
o
CD
c e
J3
IOO
o
50
2.42 Rn (Table
7, 10)
0.02
0,04
0,06
0.08
0.10
Time, t (sec)
Figure 7.31.
Column base moments vs time
c.
Preliminary
Siz.es of
Members.
The preLLminary coliHnn footing
sizes are determined on the basis of the maximum column vertical load
(fig.
725) and
the dynamic design bearing capacity, 30 ksf
Required area =
30
1000 = 11.1 sq ft
83
EM 1110-31+5-417 15 Jan 58
'
7_27<i
Try column footings, 3 f t 6 in. square, area = 12.25 sq ft. The size of the wall footing is determined by using the maximum value of blast load on the footing projection and adding to it the dead load of
wall and overburden.

Dead load of exterior wall and footing:
(assume wall height = 18.0,
footing width and depth = 2.5 ft, neglect overburden) Wall = (2)(l50/1000)(ll/12)l8(l8.0) = 89.0 kips
Footing = (2)(150/1000)(2. 5)2. 5(18.0) = 33.8 kips Total wall dead load = 89.0 + 33,8 = 122.8 kips
Maximum value of blast load = 5^ kips (fig. 7.26)

Theoretical vidth
total exterior wall load length (allovable bearing capacity)
This value is too small for practical purposes, hence an arbitrary
vidth of 2 ft 6 in. will be used for subsequent analyses.

& Preliminary Depth of Foundation.
The time variation of the un-
balanced load is obtained in table 7.12 by subtracting the available

Table 7.12.
Determination of Unbalanced Lateral Load
7-27d
EM 1110-345-417 15 Jan 58
The lateral load causing
frictional force from the total lateral load.

sliding is obtained from figure 7-30.
is obtained
The frictional resistance to sliding
by multiplying the total vertical load by the coefficient of
friction^
p,
=0.50
(par. 7-18).
The total vertical load at any time is ob-
tained by adding the dead load of the total structure to the vertical loads
in figure 7.27.
Columns =3-35 kips (par. 7-23)
Column strap footings = 2.5(2.5)^0(0.15) = 37-5 kips

Total dead load = 122.8 +3.35 +37-5 = 163.6 kips
The unbalanced lateral load is then the total lateral load minus the fric-
tional resistance to sliding.

84 kips.
The maximum value of this unbalance is
The procedure recommended in paragraph 6~3^ c requires that the depth

of footing be that necessary to develop sufficient passive pressure resist-
ance to equal twice the unbalanced lateral load at any time.
The effect of
the blast pressures acting on the surface of the ground at the back of the
building should be included in determining the passive pressure resistance.

In this example the back wall loading does not begin until 0.030 sec (table
7.11) and there is no unbalanced lateral load after t = 0.005 sec (table
7 12 )
. ,
The required depth of footing is determined by:
p
where
F
2^
n?0
2
= normal component of total passive resistance = 2(maximum unbalance) = 2(84) = l68 kips
The resistance to lateral motion is provided by the lesser of:
(l)
combined passive pressure resistances of front and back footings or (2) frictional resistance of earth between footings plus passive pressure resistance of back footing.
Considering case (l) first,

the length of back wall capable of
[s
resisting passive pressure is 18 ft.

The effective height of soil is Eg-
ILowJ
Front
]|
wan
Back won
85
EM
1110-314.5-14-17
15 Jan 58
The length of front wall capable of resisting passive pressure is

(18
-
2.5) = 15.5 ft.
The effective height of soil is

=
(Hj
(1.5 ft) +
(increase for height of concrete floor)

-
1.5 +
(-5)
1.25 ft.
Fp
= front wall resistance + back wall resistance

-
1.25
x2
/,,
\2
18*
1.25T
+ 18(10)
0.100(H
168 = 15.5(10)0.100
_JL_
EL = 3.68 ft (compare available H_ = JD 15
On this basis, the back footing is capable of providing a passive resistance equal to
18:
18(10 )Q.1QO(368)
2
121 kips
The potential frictional resistance of soil between footings equals ^W = ^1(7)15. 5(1^ - 1.25)14-1.7 - 0.50(0.100)15.5(2.14-3)111.7 = 78 kips 78 + 121 = 199 > 168, case (2) is OK.
e.
Overturning Moment.
The sketch below indicates the position of

loads considered in the
22.r
overturning computations.
In table 7-13, the
Pf,
wall
Pf
time variation of the over-
turning moment on the struc4,31'
ture is determined.
The
wall reaction overturning
moment is obtained by multiplying the net wall reaction from figure 7.28
by 2.50 ft.
The wall support moments M
are obtained from data in tables J.2
In the elastic range Mm11 = (R nL)/8, for one bay In the elasto-plastic and plastic ranges = [(18)/8](17.5)R = 39-3R Mwall = 18(59.5) = 1070 kip-ft. The column base moments are obtained by multiplying the column moments (fig. 7-3l) "by the number of columns in one
and 7.11.
86
7-27f
EM 1110-3^5-417
15 Jan 58
Table 7.13. Determination of Overturning Moment
bay.
The footing projection righting moment is obtained by multiplying the
blast load on front footing projection from figure 7.26 by 22.1 ft. The back footing overturning moment is obtained by multiplying the blast load
on back footing projection from figure 7.32 by 22.1.
The vertical blast
load on the rear footing (fig. 7-32) is obtained by multiplying the pro-
jecting footing area by the rear face overpressure (fig. 7-10) obtaining
= 2.05P, J 0.79(l8)P, '^ 1000 back -r-i^ back
.
The overturning moment due to the passive pressure is neglected

conservatively.
f
Combined Axial Load and Overturning Moment.
From the equation
for combined stresses it is possible to "write

Ultimate bearing capacity =
P T +
"
Me
From -which by substitution is obtained
30,
"
197-5
55,290
P = 5929 - 0.0806M
where
Ultimate bearing capacity = 30 kips/ft
(par. 7-18)
P = total vertical load on one bay of foundation
= total area of one
bay of foundation = 197

87
5 ft
EM
15 Jan 58
7-2?f
CL
15
-4-
o
LL
i.
0)
o
O O
CD
H o
0.02
0,04
Time,
t
0.06
(sec)
0.08
O.iO
Figure 7.32.
Vertical blast load on rear footing
88
,.
7-27g
EM 1110-3^5-^17
15 Jan 58
M = total overturning moment on foundation

c -
==
distance to extreme point on foundation from center k moment of inertia of foundation = 55,290 ft
P
Introducing the
for
P
and
data from table 7.13 into the equation
(above) shows that the soil pressures and the preliminary sizes of
the foundation elements are satisfactory.
Design of Foundation Members be necessary to determine stresses

the critical condition.
at.,
In a complete design study it would
various times in order to determine
To illustrate the. procedure it is sufficient to
compute stresses at only one time.

The column strap footing is designed for the stress conditions at
t = 0.055 sec.
One bay of the foundation 18 ft wide centered on a column
strap footing is considered (fig. 7-33)P

111'
197-5
= 5.63 ksf
(tables 7.12 and 7-13)

- 2^62(22. -
5M
- 1-00 ksf 1 no
55,290
5.63-1.00 * 4. 63 ksf
:6,63ksf
a.
Soil Pressure
Diagram
b.
Vertical Forces
119.34
Figure 7.33.
Vertical forces and soil pressure on foundation
T*16 soil pressure The soil pressure variation is shown in figure 733a. load per foot (fig. 7-33^)multiplied by the footing width gives the soil
EM
15 Jan 58
7-2?g
In figures 7,33 and 7-3^ all the forces and moments acting on the
foundation at time t = 0.055 sec
are',
shown.
They are as follows:
Front -wall = rear vail = 122.8/2 = 6l.4 kips (par. 7-27c)
Column strap footing = 37-5/^0 =
0.9*1-
kip- ft (par. 7-27d)
Front footing blast load = 21.0 kips (table 7-13)
Rear footing blast load =
I*..
9 kips (fig. 7-32)
Column load (3-35 + 936)/3 = 313 kips (table 7-10)(fig. 7-12) Moment at base of front wall = 9*A kip-ft (table 7.13)
Moment at base of rear wall = 225 kip-ft (table 7-13)
= 18(22-9) = ^13 kips (table 7-2) 2n Friction at base of footing = 557 kips (table 7-12)
Shear at base of front wall = l8V
The moments at the base of
the front and rear walls are as-
sumed to be transmitted to the

column strap footing.
This is
conservative procedure for the

strap footing since the fixity
at the base of the wall must be
provided continuously along the

wall.
The friction force is as-
sumed to be distributed along

the base proportionally to the
total vertical soil load.

b,
For
B
Moment
(kip-ft/ft) about Centerline of

to Soil
example between points
A and
(2.5)
Footing Due
Friction
W
Figure 7.34.
+ = 83.3^-
85.32
Applied moments and shears
= 210.8 kips
Friction =
~^
-
(55?) = 105- ^ kips (table 7.12)
The critical sections are considered below.
Shear Point E
Z loads down
175
Z loads up (fig. 7-33b)

-
61.* + 313 + 18.29(0.9*0
117 36
'
2- 5
90
7-27g
EM
15 Jan 58
V V
= 396.5 - 587-1 = -190.6 kips = -190.6(1.5)

= -286 kips
Shear Point G
^
y~jr
- (4. 9 + 614) -
(117^36
119.31^
2>5
= 66.3 295.9 = -229.6 kips
= 1.5(-229-6) = -344 kips
Moment Point C (figs. 7-33 and 7-34)
JL
= 9 44 + 413(1.25) + 235 + 32(1.25) + 52.7(2.5) +
/8^_^4 +
ftq.-5o\
2-5
JL
1.5
2007
= 3010 kip-ft
Moment Point E (figs. 7.33 and 7-34)
M = -225 j-j
65(1.25) + 235 + 32(1.25) + 73-9(2.5) +
14.17(1.79) + 9.49(16.5) + 4.9(20.39) + 61.4(19.53) +
313(18.25) + 0.94(l8.2 9 )(9.l4)
117 36
-
(2.5X19.54).
(16. 5 )(8.25)
(l.79)d7.39)
M
1.5
= 1051
= 1577 kip-ft
The footing strap is checked to determine if the sizes originally assumed can be reinforced suff iciently. The sections are checked for bending
moment capacity by equation 4.l6 -with the values of f,

f
and f
'
replaced by
and f
respectively, because the loads are considered to be applied
statically.
Section at Point E
= pbdf d *
=2.5
ft, assume d = 30 in.
(eq.
J+.
16)
For p = 0.02
Mp
= 0.02(2.5)30(40)30
i -
1520 kip-ft
EM
15 Jan 58
7-2?g
Up
= 1520 kip-ft
1577 kip-ft; OK
Shear at this location = 286 kips Shear stress = v =

(eq.
8(286)1000 = v = 7(30)30
For no web reinforcement, allowable v = O.o4f

= 0.04(3000) + (5000)0.02
= 120 + 100 = 220 psi
+ 5000p
(eq.
4.24a)
Stirrups are supplied ta provide (363
220 = 143 psi) additional re-
quired shear strength.
rf
llt-3
(eq.
U.2^)
= 0.0036
* -
- - isrfei bs
=1.29
sq.
0036
in. /ft
-
Section at Point C
/
b = 3-5 ft, assume d = 30 in.

-
=pbdf d fl
y
For p =0.03
Pf v \
y-r^r
(eq.
Mp
. 0.03(3.5)30(^)30
[i
i^)J
G.
= 2900 kip-ft Mp
w 3010
kip-ft; OK
Maximum shear occurs at point

tion as point C.
This location has same cross sec-
For reversal of load on structure maximum shear would oc-
cur at point C (V = 344 kips).
Shear stress = v = T^T (eq 4.23)

1000
If no shear reinforcement is used, the allowable v =
5000p (eq
lj..2lrt>).
v = 0.04(3000) + 5000(0.03) = 120 + 150 = 270 psi

#
Shear reinforcement equal to (312 - 270 = 42 psi) is provided.

r =
* 0.000925
92
7-27H
EM 1110-345.417 15 Jan 58
= rbs 0.000925(^2)12 = O.V7 sq in. /ft v Since the critical sections are capable of resisting moments and
shears, the entire foundation footing strap could be reinforced in propor-
tion to moments and shears.
The vail footings need only nominal reinforce-
ment since dimensions selected are much larger than necessary for calculated soil pressure,
h.
Dynamic Foundation
''-
9=
Design,
The dynamic design
bL
20'- 0"
procedure (par. 6-31c) usually
results in a more economical
2'-0"
design than the quasi -static

procedure because the dynamic
effects axe computed rather
Typicol Boy 18'- 0"
2-6"
than conservatively estimated.

The results of the
9
quasi-static design, -with
certain modifications illus-
43'- 6"
trated in figure 7-35, will be

45'-0
used as a preliminary design

in the dynamic design procedure.
In this design the
Figure 7.35.
Plan of foundation
wall footings are placed eccentrically to assist in resisting overturning
most effectively.
and Using the principles presented in paragraph 6.31e for the sliding overturning analysis, the horizontal acceleration X and the angular acQ
celeration a about the longitudinal axis through the bottom of the footings are determined. The corresponding horizontal displacement X and the anguQ
lar displacement
are determined as a function of time by means of a
concurrent numerical integration of equations (6.9*0 and (6.95).
y
(eq.
6.9k}
= O
m -cyr
93
6.95)
Etf
7-2711
15 Jan 58
7-27i
EM 1110-345-^17
15 Jan 58
i.
Polar Moment of
!
Inertia
In table 7.l
the polar moment of inertia
of the total structure is
obtained about point "0.
"
The location of each ele-
ment in the
and
di-
rections is indicated in
figure 7-36.
The total mo-
ment of inertia is the sum,

for all elements, of the
moments of inertia of each

element about its own axis
and the moment of inertia

Figure 7.36.
Half cross section of building
of each element about the

axis through point "0."
The.
inertial effect of the soil between the front
and rear footings is conservatively neglected.

_
From table
7-1^-
T^V^l _
O Qo
4>4-
1=1
j-
+1
+ 2304 =
kip- sec /ft The rotation of the structure
Ground Foundation Interaction.
under the blast loads develops a resisting moment of the vertical soil
pressures against the footings.
The magnitude of this moment reaction
which tends to resist the overturning of the structure is given by M^ = Be where

B =
*-
(Lft (ed*. 59)
To apply this formula to a specific structure the ratio

is the moment of inertia of the actual footmust be determined, where I 7 net is the moment of inertia of a solid rectangular area in area and I ^ gross extending over the entire extent of the footings, both quantities being
evaluated about the longitudinal axis of rotation (par. ^-15d).
The net
overturning resistance of the soil is given by the product of equation

(1*.59)
and the ratio I net /I gro8B

95
EM ino.-3 <-5- I<-i7 15 Jan 58

1
net
(l/12)bd
3 -
b d
= 1
-
l l"
gross
where ; from figure 7-35,
b
(l/12)bd
=18.0 ft
= 18.0 - 2.5 = 15-5 ft
d = ^5-0 ft
1^
d
= ^5.0 - 2(2.0) =
la.o ft
L = d/2 = 1*5/2 = 22.5 ft

0,31,8
'gross
18.
0(14-5-
0)
For an ifi-ft typical bay
B
gross
Ml
(22. 5
)
18 = 1*6.1(10)
kip-ft/radian
kip-ft/radian
0.333
B_
k.
(O.S^te
= (0.
.1(10)
= 16.1(10)
Dynamic Analysis
The dynamic rigid body sliding and overturning
analysis is performed in table

is performed to obtain the time
715-
simultaneous numerical integration

G
history of the rigid body rotation
and
the rigid body translation x
The acceleration impulse extrapolation
method
(eq.
5-^9) is used for the dynamic analysis in the form
where
While the structure is sliding

(M
)
(F
where
(M
)
= moment of all external forces about axis of rotation at time n .
O"
(F
Q )n
= summation of all external horizontal forces applied to the structure at time n
EM 1110-3^5-417 15 Jan 58
So
O
"T3
C Q
co
03
C2
2
"a
*
CO
*0
97
EM 1110-3^5-lH?
15 Jan 58
"While the structure is not sliding
7-2?k
In table 715> M
o is the summation of external moments about the
point of rotation excluding horizontal footing projection moments.
The
blast loads on front and back footing projections are obtained by multiplying
pressure values from figures 7-9
a^d-
7-10, respectively, by
9/12[l^P(l8)/1000] = 1-95P.
The lateral passive soil pressure force F p is considered to vary linearly with displacement from zero to a peak value at x = O.CA-BL
0.179 ft.
From paragraph 7-27 the maximum available force is F p = l8l + 102 JT = 283 kips, where passive pressure on rear face gives [l8(lO)(0.l)(4.48)
= 102. = 1580x.
f*.
]/2
= 181 and friction between wall footings gives 0.5(0.1)15-5(4.48 - 1.25)4l
Thus at any displacement
the passive force is F = (283/0. 179 )x p This is the value with no pressure on the soil at the rear of the x
,
building.
If there is blast pressure on the soil at the rear, the passive
force increases.
The additional passive force can be determined from the
surcharge equivalent of the overpressure, thus AF p = K A (blast load) 4.48 = ll6P = [lO(l^)P In table 7-15 the lateral motion back back (l8)l4-.W]/1000 ceases before the blast wave begins to load the soil at the rear of the
.
building and the passive force is considered to remain at a constant value.

The effect of the pressure on the soil is then considered as an ac-
tive soil pressure force equal to one-fourth the passive force, or

116P,
back = 29Pback ^
The centroid of F
is at
= 4.48/3 = 1.49 ft above the base of the foot= y ^
ing, and the centroid of the blast pressure induced force is at y
= 4.48/2 = 2.24 ft above the base of the footing.
The vertical load is obtained by adding the dead load of the walls,
foundation, and columns to the tabulated values of P
and the blast loads
on front and back footing projections.

table 7.l4 is:
The partial dead load obtained from
7 ~ 271
EM
Columns Front wall Back wall Column strap Front wall footing Back wall footing
160.9 kips
1110-345-14.17 15 Jan 58
In table 7.15 column 18, when x > x , i.e. n + 1 n

(M
structure is sliding,
(a
on
I
Q
(F x
n^
o nj 2
_ column 11 - column 17
31^8
- 8.
18(8. 83
= 0.0003559 (column 11 - column 17)

i.e.
structure is not sliding,

= 0.00029 (column 11)
The results of the numerical analysis in table 7.15 are: (1) Maximum rigid-body translation (x ) = 0.000778 ft,
(2) Maximum rigid-body rotation (0)
max
= 0.000258 radians.
(3) Vertical upward motion at the front = 0.000258(^5/2) = 0.0058 ft.
These motions are negligible] the next step is to investigate soil

pressiires and member siz.es.
1.
Design of Foundation Members.
In a refined analysis it would be
necessary to determine stresses at various times in order to determine the

critical stress condition.
However, to illustrate the procedure in this
design, stresses axe computed at only one time.
The column strap footing is designed for the stress conditions at

t = 0.060 sec.
One bay of the foundation 18 ft wide centered on a column
strap footing is considered.

The soil pressure is computed from
P
-r
-f
where
P = total vertical load
A
0B
= total area of foundation = 2(2.0)(l8) + 2.5(^1-0) = 17^-5 = 4158 kip-ft overturning reaction (table 7*15)
sq.
ft
c =
distance to extreme point on foundation =

99
14-5-0/2
= 22.5 -ft
EM
15 Jan 58
7-271
I = moment of inertia of foundation I = 136,000 - 89,200 = ^6,800 ft*
table 7-15
.
^ = 2 - OQ ksf
.
40.5'
6.
27-2.00"'
4.27 ksf
6.27+2.00
22.5'
22,5'
-*8.27kst
o.
Soil
Pressure Diogrom
b.
Vertical Forces
Figure 7.37.
Vertical forces
and
soil pressure on foundation
The soil pressure multiplied
Toy
the footing width gives the soil load
per foot.
In figures 7-37 and 7-38 all the forces and moments acting on
They are as follows:
the foundation at time t = 0.050 sec are shown.
Front wall = back wall = 1 3.1+7 kips (table 7.1*0 Wall footing = lk.^2 kips (table 7.1*0
Column strap footing = ^1.66/^-1.0 = 1.02 kips/ft (table 7.1*0

Front footing blast load = 19 kips (table 7-15) Back footing blast load = 6.0 kips (table 7-15)
100
7-271
EM 1110-345-417 15 Jan 58
548k
o.
Applied Moments and Lateral Shears

41.0'
2,0'-
2.0
98,5
S
52.5
/I2.0
b.
Moment
(kip - ft/ft) about Centerline of Footing Due to Soil Friction
Figure 7.38.
Applied moments and shears and moment due
to friction
Column load = (3-35 +910)/3 = 304 kips (table 7-15)
Moment at
"base of
front wall = 583 kip-ft (table 7-13)
Moment at base of back wall = 317 kip-ft (table 7-13)

Shear at base of front wall = l8V
2n
= 18(18.9) = 3^0 kips (table 7-2)
Shear at base of back wall = l8V^n = 18(^.9) = 88 kips (table 7-ll)
Friction at base of footirlg =
5^
kips (table 7-15)
Column shear = 102/3 = 3^ kips (fig- 7-29) Column base moments = 7^1/3 = 2^7 kip-ft (table 7-13) The moments at the base of the front and back walls are assumed to be
transmitted to the column strap footing.
This is a conservative procedure
for the strap footing since the fixity at the base of the wall must be pro-
vided continuously along the wall.

The friction force is assumed to be distributed along the base in
proportion to the total vertical soil pressure.
For example, between points
A and B
w = 77-0
80 2
'
(2.0) = 157-2 kips
101
EM 1110-3^5-417
15 Jan 58
7-2T1
Friction =
(5^8) * 78.8 kips
In figure
738b the moment about
the center line of footing due to
soil friction is eq.ua! to 2.67/2 (friction force per foot).
Thus between
The critical
A and B the moment equals 78.8/2 X 2.67/2

sections axe considered below.
Shear Point C
= 52.5 kip-ft/ft.
V V
= 2 loads down - Z loads up (fig. 7-37b)
= [6.0 + ik.k +
ij-3.5
+ 3C& + 20.5(1.02)]
(2.0) *
V' 6
I
2Q - 2
V - (388,8
Shear Point D
- 661.8) = -273 kips
V = [6.0 +
= 63.9
1^.1*.
-f
14-3
..5]
- 291I.8
-230,9 kips
Moment Point B*
= 583 + 3^0(1.34) + 2Vf + 3^(1.3^) + 52.5(2.0) + 8.9(0.5) +
77 '
* 80>2
(2.o)(i.5) + 11.1(0.5)0.25 - 19.0(2.12) - iU.Mi.5)
1*3.5(1-29)
= 1559.8 kip-ft
Moment Point C
= 583 + 3^0(1.310 + 2V? + 3^(1-3^) + 2V7 + 3^(1.3^) + 52.5(2.0) +

77> 8.9(20.5) +
-
(2-.0)21.5 +
-
11
113
(20.5)
19(22.12)
1.02(20.5)
1^.^(21.5)
(
1*3.5(21.29) - 30U(20.o). -
1^5.8 kip-ft
An approximate check is made to determine if the sizes assumed can

"be
reinforced sufficiently.
The bending moment capacity of the footing

(ij-.l6)
strap is "based on equation
with f
and f
'
replaced by f
and
f^,
respectively, because the soil pressure loads are considered as static

loads.
102
7-271
EM 1110-345-417 15 Jan 58
b = 2.5 ft, assume
Section at Point B'
d = 30 in.
_
= pbd f d (i Mp y For
-
T-
(eq.
4.16)
p = 0.020
- 0.020(2.5)30(40)30
= 1518 kip-ft, 1518
-
Mp
[l
Mp
1560 ft-kips; OK, section can be reinforced

The cross section is the same as
Shear is investigated at point D.
at point B.
maxim-urn shear
If the initial blast load is from the opposite direction the
occurs at point B(V = 231 kips)

*
Shear stress = v = =r- (eq

_ " 293 psl yj psi
7(30)30
If no veb reinforcement is used the
allowable v = O.cA-f
+ 5000p
(eq.
/.
0.0lj-(3000)
-f
5000(0.020) = 220 psi, 220 < 293 psi;

-
stirrups are
needed to supply 293

r =
Tforioo
220 = 73 psi
00183
= rbs = 0.00183(30)12 = 0.659 sq. in./ft A^ Section at Point C b = 2.5 ft, assume d = 30 in.
= pbd f d Mp y
/
f
1 -
-r y-^r
P fv \
I
(eqL
4.l6)
(pair.
For minimum steel, p = 0.006
4.10a)
Mp
= 0.006(2.5)30(40 ) 3 o = 51^.6 kip-ft
Mp
51^.6
>
1U5.8 kip-ft; OK
Shear at this location = 273
103
EM 1110-3^5-1*17 15 Jan 58
Slxear
7 _28
stress v =
O.CA-f^
4-
Allowable v =
0.04(3000)
+ 500Cp
(eq.
5000(0.006) = 150 psi

-
Stirrups must be provided to supply (3^7

web reinforcement.
r = 197/^0,000 = O.OCA-93
150 = 197 psi) sufficient
= rbs = 0.00493(30)12 = 1.77
sq.
in./ft
Since the footing strap is of constant cross section in this example,
other locations of the strap can be reinforced sufficiently.
In this par-
ticular design the earth passive pressure effect could have been neglected,
since a much greater resistance to sliding
"was
supplied by the frictional
effect of the soil.
In general, however, the passive pressure effect
should not be neglected because in certain cases the principal resistance

to sliding is supplied by the passive pressure.
The results of the dynamic analysis indicate the development of a
maximum soil pressure which is much lower than the permissible value and
the requirement of relatively high percentage of reinforcement in the
column strap footing.
Because of these, another cycle of design for further
refinement might include a reduction in plan area of all foundation members
and an increased depth of column strap footing.
In addition, the depth of
foundation below ground surface could be reduced, if need be, because little
use is made of the potential passive pressure.
NUMERICAL EXAMPLE, DESIGN OF A ONE-STORY STEEL FRAME BUILDING - ELASTIC BEHAVIOR
1-2&
GENERAL.
This numerical example presents an elastic design of a
typical bay of a windowless one-story, steel, rigid-frame building with reinforced concrete vails and roof.
Included is the design of a typical wall

7-39).
slab, roof slab, girder, and column of the building (fig.
One-way reinforced concrete slabs are used for both the wall and
roof deck.
The roof slab is supported by structural steel purlins.
The
girders and columns of the frame are structural steel sections joined
by
7-29
EM 1110-345-417
15 Jan 58
welding to provide moment-resisting connections.

No foundation design is presented.
Reference is made to paragraph
7-27 for an illustration of this design procedure.
Cross Section
I
I8'-0";I
18-0" J, 'S'-O"
S'-O'î
le'-O'ÎJS'-O",
o
"oo
=
I
"CD
I
7-29
o
ro
T
---1--Part Plan
Figure 7.39.
Plan and section of building
DESIGN EROCEDURE,
Step
1.
The steps in the design procedure are as follovs:
Estimate the sizes of all structioral elements which deter-
mine the over -all dimensions of the building.

Step
2.
Compute and plot the time relationship for the incident
overpressure, the front face overpressure, the rear face overpressure, the net lateral overpressure, and the average roof overpressure in accordance
vith EM 1110-345-413 procedures.

Design the wall slab using the procedure of paragraph 6-12 and an idealized triangular load vs time curve derived from the front face overpressure vs time curve. Check the design using the actual time variaStep
3.
tion of front face overpressure in a numerical integration.

analysis obtain the dynamic reaction on the roof slab.
From this
105
EM 1110-3^5-^17
15 Jan 58
7-30
Step
h-.
Follow the same procedure as for step 3 for the roof slab
In both preliminary designs the incident overThe numerical in-
and the purlin design.
pressure is idealised by a triangular load-time curve.
tegration check of the preliminary roof slab is performed using the incident overpressure curve.
The numerical integration check of the purlin
is based on the dynamic reactions from the slab giving due consideration
to the effect of blast -wave direction on the purlin loads.
Step
5*
Make a preliminary design of the column assuming the girders
to be infinitely rigid and neglecting the effect of axial load on the

column.
is used.
As in all other preliminary designs, an idealized load-time curve

This load is obtained from the net lateral overpressure-time curve
Step 6.
Design the girder using an idealized load derived from the
purlin dynamic reactions and check by a numerical integration using the
purlin dynamic reactions directly.
Step
*
7.
Check the. column design by a numerical integration consider-
ing the relative flexibility of the column and girder and the effect of
axial load on the column.
For the load use the dynamic reactions from the
vail slab.
7-30
IOAD DETERMIMTIOIT.
The computation of loads is explained in
EM 1110-3^5-^13 and illustrated again in paragraph 7-19 for a one-story

building.
In this example the necessary load curves are presented without
any explanation or computation.
The design overpressure of 10 psi is
selected arbitrarily for this example.

The overpressure vs time curves that are presented are:
(1) Incident overpressure vs time (fig.
7.^4-0)
(2) Front face overpressure vs time (fig.
7.^4-1)
(3) Rear face overpressure vs time (fig. 7. ^2)
00
Net lateral overpressure vs time (fig, 7.
(5) Average roof overpressure vs time (fig.
106
7-30
EM 1110-345-417
15 Jan 58
N-
O
0)
>
O
0)
E
\
T5
o d ~
tO
00 fO
1
(0
O
**
!2
O c
CD
00
(..sd)
s
I
in
ro
CM
d
10?
EM 1110-31*5 15
7-
Jan 58
25.3
24
0,1
0,2
0,3
0,4
t
0,5
0,046
Time,
Figure 7.41.
(sec)
0.6
Front face overpressure vs time curve
108
7-30
EM
15 Jan 58
<w
a
03
o
<u
ro
c\l
âjnssdJdJdAQ aooj
109
EM
1110-31*5-11.17
15 Jan 58
7-30
110
7-30
EM 1110-345-417 15 Jan 58
O
0>
Cb
V
g
<b
111
EM 1110-3^5-417
15 Jan 58
7-31
7-31
DESIGN OF WAIL SIAB.
The wall slab is designed as a simple beam, one
foot in width, spanning vertically between the foundation and the roof
slab.
The slab is designed so that a plastic hinge will be developed at
midspan when the slab is subjected to the design loading.
This strain con-
dition is considered to be the limit of the elastic range for purposes of

this manual.
The preliminary elastic design pro-
4 dH-
cedure is outlined and then illustrated by
an example in paragraph 6-12.
The dead
load stresses are neglected for a vertical

II67
.
wall.
The slab thickness is selected so
as to illustrate a procedure for designing

slabs which are critical for shear stress.
^
a.
To reduce the shear stress a thicker slab
might be used.
The design span length is equal to
the clear height of the wall between foundation and roof.
Design Loading.

B=42, Skips
loading shown by figure 7-^1 is defined by:
B.
= 25.3 x*
1000
= te.6 kips
=
0.046sec
T = 0.0^6 sec
b.
Time
(sec)
(Refer to table 6.1.

= 0.78
IT = 0.64,
K, = 0.50,
v _ Jx
~
AX
V = 0.39R
+ 0.11P
^^3
c.
First Trial
Actual Properties.
Assume D.L.F. = 1.7 (experience)
= D.L.F.(B) = 1.7(^2.6) = 72.5 kips (par. 6-11)
Assume p = 0.015
112
7-31d
EM
15 Jan 58
= 0.015(52)(l)d2
jl
iY?3
'
9)
= 0.688d2 kip-ft (d
in inches)
it
2 - ^S. = (8)0.688d - 70 5 * = f = ('-j) , m L 11.57

-.
d - JJI.M- in 12 k in.
0-
Try h = lk.0 in.,
P - 0-015,
= 0.688d
_
np = 0.15
2 = 0.688(12. 5 )
,
l^ 8TIt .
l 3/4
'
cover
,.
= 107-5 kip-ft
^
L
_ 8(107.5) _ 7 , =
11.07
in.
T T
jrl
+ np(l
k)
-j
2| J
12(d)3
U0^2r L
-5
15(1
o.
I
a.
1 = 0.905d3 = 0.905(12.5)3 = 1770 in. * =0.5(1 + L.) = 0.5(27^0 + 1770) = 2255 in.
go
k = 5L
3
m (38^)3(10)2255 = 2270
Mass m =
d.
|^~ Sll'C.
= 0.063^ kip-sec /ft

-
First Trial
=
(eq.
e = =
l^k
= 0.61j-(2270) = 1^50 kips/ft
6.6)
m
T
e.
Km
2 = 0.50(0.063^) = 0.0317 kip-sec /ft (eq 6.8) =

-
an^T/lT
First Trial
6.28^0.0317/1^50
= 0.0293 sec
(eq.
6.lU)
Available Resistance vs Required Resistance.
= T/T = 0.0it6/0.0293 = 1.57 n
D.L.F. = 1.7 (fig. 5-20)
t /T = 0.3 (fig- 5.20) m t = 0.3(0.01^6) = 0.0138 sec
113
EM nio-3^5-^17 15 Jan 58
Idealized load is satisfactory replacement for actual load-time
curve up to t = 0.0138 sec (par. 5-13).
7-3lf
Required R^ = D.L.F.(B) = 1.7(^2.6) = 72.5 kips The required R < available R , therefore the -selected proportions are
satisfactory as a preliminary design.
f.

-m
At t
= 0.0138 sec, P = -'

'
1000
= 31-0 kips (fig. ?
V = 0.39R + 0.11P = 0.39(72.5) + 0.11(31.0) = 28.3 + 3.1)- = 31.7 kips m = 0.15(3000) = 450 psi (par. ^-09) Allowable u = 0.15f^
12.5'
I4.d'
_/_
M
3-" Cover
to Allow for
Try #9 at 5-1/2 in., A = 2.18 in/
Possible Shear Reinforcement
Zo = 7.72
in.
2.18
"
12(12.5)
g.
= 0.01^5,
np = 10(0.01^5) = 0.1^5
I
= =
-bh
/12 =
= 27^0 in.
-
^ + np(l
g
2
k)
= 12(l2.5) a
[^
= 1720 in.
I
= 0.5(1
+ I.) = .0.5 (27^0 + 1720) = 2230 in.
Mass m =
2 = 0.063^ kip-sec /ft

R m =69.6
pf
"P
Maximum Deflection
k y.
=
2250
kips/ft
0.031 ft
= 1CA-.5 kip-ft (eq ^.
Deflection, y
(f t)
Figure 7.45. Resistance function for 14-in. slab spanning

.
= 71.6
2.0^ = 69.6 kips
11.67
ft
as a simple
beam
EM 1110-345-417 15 Jan 58
k =
L
3 5(ll.67) l44
kips/ft
69.6 _ ~ 2250
Table 7.16.
ft
The basic equation for the numerical integration in table 7.16 is
n
p
'
yn
(table
(P
-
wilere
v(Atr
=s
R )(0.003)
-
R) n
ft
The time interval At

(par. 5-08).
0.003 sec is approximately equal to T /10
The dynamic reaction equation is given in paragraph 7"by
The P
values for column 2 are obtained from figure 74l, multiplying
144(11. 67)/ 1000 = 1.68 to obtain load in kips.
The maximum deflection (y ) n
computed in table J.1&, is 0.031 ft
vhich is equal to the allowable y

k*
of 0.031 ft.
=30.1 kips (table 7l6)

Allowable v
=
O.o4f^
+ 5000p (eq 4.24)
= 0.04(3000) + 5000(0.0145) = 120 + 72-5 = 192.5

-
v =
Tbd
7(12)(12.5)
= 229 psi, therefore shear reinforcement re-
quired for 229 - 192.5 = 37 psi.

115
EM 1110-3^5417
15 Jan
.58
7-3H
3'- 9"
Dowels
No. 7 ot
II"
r =
Constr. Jt.-
37 = 0.001 IK), 000

i #3,
0.11
= 0.001,
3'
-9"
.'.
s = 10 in.
u =
No, 9 at
No. 4
II
8V " 8(30,100) 7Zod 7C7-72J12.5
at 8-
= 356 psij OK
T
2'- 6"
Allowable u = 0.15f
= 0.15(3000) = 1+50 psi

i.
Constr.
Summary.
slab
1^- in.
c-o
p = 0.01^5
Foundation Steel Not Shown
Zo
=7.72
in.
Roof Stab Steel Not Shown
Shear reinforcement #3 ties
at 10-in. alternate bars.
7-32
DESIGN OF ROOF SLAB,
The design of the roof slab is similar to the
design of the vail slab in paragraph 7-31 except for the load considerations and the inclusion of dead load stresses.
This roof slab is sup-
ported on purlins spaced at

5
ft ^ in. so as to load the
girder at the third points.

The design load is based on the
5'
-4"
incident overpressure curve

(fig. 7-^0) vhich results, from
i
i
1
the blast wave moving normal to
the span direction of the slab.

The load is uniformly distributed, along the slab and varying with time.
Adjacent slab elements are loaded progressively; however, the shock wave
speed is such that the entire slab may be considered to be loaded at once.
The slab is continuous over the purlins; however, it is designed as
a single span fixed at both ends according to the procedures of paragraph

7-11.
The span length of the beam is the center line spacing of the purlin
The design is based on a one-foot width of slab.
116
7-32a
EM 1110-314-5-417 15 Jan 58
a.
Design Loading.
Hie design load as idealized

B
-
from the computed loading shown by figure

by:
B = 10 psl . T = 0.38 sec
, 7 . 6Q kips
?Ao
7.69 kfps
is defined
T* 0,38 sec
Time
"b
(sec)

)
(Refer
to table 6.1.
KT = 0.53,
T)
K. = OAl,
k =
KTM = 0.77
_ "
'
V = 0.36R + O.l^P J n n
c.
First Trial
Actual Properties.
(experience)
Assume D.L.F. =
2.0'
= D.L.F.(B) = 2.0(7.69) = 15.38 kips (par. 6-11)
Assume p = 0.015
- P
V*
= 0-688d 2
= 0.015(52)(l)d
kip-ft (d
in inches)
L
Try h =
^
U-lA
in., d =
3-lA
in.,
j:
^N
_. ,
p = 0.015, np = 0.15 2 2 M = 0.688d = 0.688(3- 25 ) = 7-26 kip-ft

Cover
^(3"
m
I
. 16.35 kips
= bh3 /12 = (Iu25) 3 = 76.5 in. + np(l

.
2
k)
. 12(d )3
3 = 0<905d3 = 0. 905(3.25 ) = 31.0 inI = 0.5(l + It ) = 0.5(31.0 + 76.5) = 53-7 in. a g
k =
117
kips/f t
EM 1110-345-1*17
15 Jan 58 Weight =
5,33 .
.0] 2 = 0.00975 kip-sec /ft
-
7-32d
kips
Mass m =
d.
First Trial
=
KLk =
53(2840) = 1505 kips/ft (eg. 6.6} = 0.^1(0.00975) = O.OCA- kip-sec/ft (eg. 6.8)
-
T = n
e.
=
-
6.28^fo.OCA./1505
= 0.01025 sec (eq 6.
First Trial
= T/T = 0.38/0.01025 = 37-0 n D.L.F. = 2.0 (fig. 5-20)

C
t /T m
(fig. 5.^0)
sec
Required Rm = D.L.F^B) = 2.0(7.69) = 15.38 kips The required R available R .therefore the selected proportions are j JQ*
*
JJ-
J-
satisfactory as a preliminary design.

f
.
At t
= 0, P = '
+
1000
= 7.6 9
(fig.
V = 0.36R
i
= 0.36(16.35) + 0.14(7.69) = 5.9 + = 0.15(3000) = 450 psi (par. 4-C
1.08=6.98 kips
Allo wa"ble u =
V
-ujd
"
450(77(3.25)
= 5.45 in.
in.
Try #4 at 3-1/2 in.,
A s = 0.69
2
^
Zo = 5 4 in.
}
p = A g/bd =
g.
np = 10(.0176) = 0.176
"by
Determination of Maximum Deflection and Dynamic Reactions
= 76.5 in
2 2 k = Vn p + 2np
-
np = O.
-
^ + np(l
in.
k)
= 12(3.25) 3
[S^ + 0.176(1
O.
= 0.5(1- + g
L) u
= 0.5(76.5 + 3^.5) = 55-5
118
7-32g
EM 1110-345-417 15 Jan 58
Weight = 0.31^ kips
Mass
m =
*^
= 0.00975 kip-sec 2/ft
Pf - pf
ay
dc
I
= 0.0176(52)(1)(3.25) = 835 kip-ft

(eq.
0.0176(52)"!
1-7(3.9) J
2930 kips/ft
O.OO63
ft
k.l6)
Maximum Deflection
-
Rm =
k =
-
weight =
0.314 = 18.5 kips

Deflection, y(ft)
kips/ft
Figure 7.46. Resistance function for a 4-1/4-in. continuous
k =
oo6 3
slab spanning 5.33
ft
The basic equation for the numerical integration in table 7-17 is

'
yn
"6
)10
The time interval At = 0.001 sec is approximately equal to Tn/10 = 0.001025 (par. 5-08). The dynamic reaction equations are listed in
Table 7.17.
Slab Determination of Maximum Deflection and Dynamic Reactions for Roof
119
EM 1110-3^5-^17
15
Jaji 58
7-32h
paragraph 7-32b. The P values for the second column are obtained from figure 7-^0, multiplying by [lW 5- 33) (1)3/1000 = 0.769 to obtain load in
kips.
The maximum deflection (y
)
computed in table 717> is 0.0052
ft.
This is less than y = 0.0063

la.
ft.
Design is satisfactory.

kips (table 7-17)
Vmax! =6.56
Allowable v

= O.cA-f
4'
+ 500Qp
(eq.
k.2k)
v
y
= 0.0^(3000) =
5000(0.0176) = 120 + 88 = 208 psi
'rETT
fbCL
= T/ioWo QC\ =
^
,
P si * OK> no
sllear
reinforcement required
8(6560)
. "
Allovable u = O.ljf
= 0.15(3000) = ^50 psi; OK for bond

41/4",
5' -
"
7-33
tlie
DESIGN OF ROOF PURLINS.
The purlins are framed flush with the top of
girders and are provided with moment-resisting connections.
The top
flanges of the purlins are anchored to lateral support to the top compression
the concrete roof slab to provide

flange.
t
Although composite behavior of the slab and purlin can be expected
develop to a limited e^ctent, preliminary computations showed that design Tor independent behavior of slab and purlin is more desirable for this arrangement of slab and purlin (pars. U--12 and lin design neglects composite behavior.
no"t into the plastic range.
6-23).
Accordingly, this pur

9
The purlins are designed to pass into the elasto-plastic range, but
This means that the deflection is limited to
necessary to just develop the plastic hinges at midspan.

120
This point
EM
15 Jan 58
is indicated in figure 7-50 (page
L30).
Since the design proce-
lures of this manual provide only

?or single-span elements, this
purlin is designed as a fixed-end

3
earn
spanning 18 ft between
r
L=18'-0"
girder center lines.
^
;he
fading
For the blast wave moving normal to the long axis of
building and thus normal to the axis of the purlin, the loading may be considered to be uniformly distributed along the length of the purlin. For
/his condition the pressure vs time variation at each point on the roof is
function of its position (par. 3-09). In addition the load on a purlin Is a function of the length of the slab spans between purlins because the Load on the purlin increases as the blast wave traverses the two adjoining
i
ibs.
In the preliminary design of the purlins the design load is obted from the incident overpressure curve (fig. 7.4o) without modificaThe rise time of the load on the slab, the slab dynamic
tion of any sort.
reactions, and local variation in overpressure on the slab are all neg-
lected in this preliminary step. For the blast wave moving parallel to the long axis of the building and thus parallel to the axis of the purlin, the load varies along the span
as a result of the time required for the blast wave to traverse the purlin span. At any point along the purlin the time variation of the load is the
same and defined by the incident overpressure vs time curve (fig. 7*^0 ) In the calculations that follow the load vs time curves for the pur-
lin are obtained first for the blast wave moving parallel to the long axis of the building and then for the blast wave moving parallel to the short
axis of the building.
The purlin obtained by the preliminary design procedure is then analyzed for both loads in tables 7-19 and 7*20 (pages 12k and 126).
Blast wave moving parallel
to the short axis of the building:
l^s
(A)
The variation of the local overpressure at the centerlines of purthe critical time period for the purlins and and
(B) during
of this building is only slightly different from the incident

121
EM
15 Jan 58
7-33a
overpressure curve (fig. 7-^0).
The detailed computations to show this are
not presented but are similar to the computations in paragraph 7-23a.
Ref-
erence to the example in paragraph 7-23 and comparison of the critical time
values of that example -with the results of the following numerical analysis
(table 7.18) show that the incident overpressure is a satisfactory "basis
for determining the purlin loading.

Table 7.18.
Determination of Dynamic Reactions for Roof Slab, Local Roof Overpressure at Centerline of Purlin (A) (Including Rise Time Correction)
The roof slab is analyzed in table 7.18 for the modified incident
overpressure curve presented in figure 7^7-
Ute analysis in table J.l
is based on the following data developed in paragraph 7.32. h p Elastic range: y (At) = 1.33(10 )(P - R ) f t
k = 2930 kips/ft y
R
= 0.0063 ft
= 18.5 kips
= 0.36R + n n n This computation is performed to obtain the slab dynamic reactions on the
purlins.
The dynamic reactions of the slab for the overpressure variation
ac purlins (A) and (B) are the same for the time range considered, because
122
7-33a
EM 1110-3^5.417 15 Jan 58
"1
o
a? CO
o S
0)
i
o
en
E
CO
ex,
IN.
^
tsl
(jsd)
e6DJ9A\/
123
EM 1110-345-417
15 Jan 58
7-33a
the maximum response of the slab occurs before there is any appreciable
difference in the overpressure at points (A) and (B).

To obtain the design load for purlins (A) and (B) the dynamic reac-
tion data from table J.lB are plotted in figure 7.48.
The total purlin
load is equa^l to the sum of the reactions of the slabs forward and aft of
the purlin.
In figure
748
it may be seen that the same dynamic reactions
are plotted with a time lag
The loads from figure 7*48 are used in table 7*19 to check the preliminary
purlin design.
Table 7.19.
Determination of Maximum Deflection and Dynamic Reactions for Purlins, Blast Wave Perpendicular to Purlin Axis
Blast wave moving parallel to the long axis of the building:

The design load on the purlin is determined in figure 7.49 using the
slab dynamic reactions obtained in table 7*17 for incident overpressure.
The variation of the average load on the purlin with time is found by in-
troducing the time lag
124
7-33a
EM 1110-3^5-^17
15 Jan 58
1 tx
*0
-O
pool PUD suoipoaa OIUJDUAQ qo|S

125
EM 1110-3^4-5-417 15 Jan 58
T-33D
because the variation in slab dynamic reaction with time is the same at
each point along the purlin.
The load curve from figure
7^9
is used in
table 7.20 to check the preliminary purlin design.

Table 7.20.
Determination of Maximum Deflection and Dynamic Reactions for Purlins, Blast Wave Parallel to Purlin Axis
The preliminary design load as idealized from the computed loading as

=
i38k.ps
shown by figure 7*^-0 is defined by
B = 10 psi =
T = 0.38 sec
T = 0.38sec
"êcsec)
Tnr^
-^38
kips
b.
Elastic range: = O.^y
= 0.53,
V = 0.36R.+ O.l^P
126
EM 1110-3^5-^17 15 Jan 58
ex.
i
O
s
co
-O
eCD
O c
!s
a~
OJLUDU^Q
a6oJ9AV PUD
127
EM 1110-345-417
15 Jan 58
K. = 0.64,
7-33c
= 0.50,
'
78
= 0.39R + 0.11P
Average values:
= -58 KT = (0.53 + 0.6100.5 = (O.Ul + 0.50)0.5 = 0.45
K^
= (0.77 + 0.78)0.5 = 0.77
R = m
T L
c.
First Trial
Actual Properties.
Assume D.L.F. =2.0 and neglect dead load stresses (experience)
Rm = D.L.F.(B) - 2.0(138)
= 1.05Sf =
= 276 kips (par. 6-11)
kip-ft (S
. 276,
/.
in in. 3 )
m
Try 16 VFÔ,
I = 515.5
=
S=62in.
V* f
= 7-0/0.503 = 13.9 < l^J OK, S = 64.4 in.

3 Z = 72.7 in. ,
-
in.\
3 0.5(S + Z) = 68.5 in.
O-Sf^S
22M
+ Z) =
12
= 237 kip-ft
P _ 22(237) _ 290 kips lo
264EI k .
L
Weight =
6.0]
5.33 +
2
4o}
^JL
. 6.4 kips
Mass m = -=|4 = 0.1985 kip-sec /ft j^.c:

d.
First Trial
(eq.
= K-k = 0^8(^870) = 2820 kips/ft
6.6)
128
7-33e
EM ino-345-417 15 Jan 58
Km
= 0.45(0.1985) = 0.0894 kip-sec 2 /ft (eq. 6.8)
=
e.
353 sec
(eq.
6.14)
First Erial
= T/T = 0.38/0.0353 = 10o8 n
D.L.F. = 1.95 (fig. 5*20)

\
t /T = 0.05 (fig- 5.20) m
= 0.05(0.38) = 0.019 sec

(fig.
Idealized load-time curve is satisfactory up to t

|
7*^0)
Required R
= D.L.F.(B) = 1-95(138) = 269 kips
The required R
< available R
therefore the selected proportions
are satisfactory as a preliminary design.

f
.
Preliminary Design for Shear Stress.
At t
= 0.019 sec, P =
j_uuu
V = 0.36R + 0.11P = 0.36(269) + 0.11(131) = 111-4 kips

v = -XT- =
dt^
/ÔAT (15 JO. 307
= 22,700 psi (allowable v = 21,000 psi)(par. 4-05c)
Since V = 111.4 kips is estimated it is desirable to continue with in-
vestigation of 16 VF40.
g.
0.5f (S Z) Mp dy Weight =6.4 kips
Mass
=
+
= 237 kip-ft
O
= 0.1985 kip-sec /ft
Elastic range:
.
1m
Weight =
lo
6.4 = 151.6 kips
= ?100 kips/ft
L3
Vl
53(7100) = 3760 kips/ft

129
EM
15 Jan 58
2
7-3311
m
T
=
e
= 0^1(0.1985) = 0.0815 kip-sec /ft

2*t
Jmc/kG
= 6. 28 Jo. 0815/3760 = 0.0292 sec
6.k
205 kips
Figure 7.50. Resistance function for 16 IP 40 purlin
spanning 18
0.021^ + 0.0376 = 0.059 ft
ft
The basic eqiiation for the numerical integration in tables 7-19 2 = y ( At ) + y 7 ( talDle 5 '3) where
7.20 is
^n
""
(Pn -
(P
.
77(.l9B^)
-
- 5.88(lO- ')(P n
:
R) n
R
)
ft,
elastic range
6
)9(10"
)
ft,
el*sto-plastic range
"
F 10 n \)9( 0.66(0.1985)
"6
)
= (lO" 5 )(P n
R) n
ft,
plastic range
The time interval At = 0.003 sec is approximately T /10 = 0.00292 (par.

5-08).
The dynamic reaction equations are listed in paragraph 7-33^-
In
table 7-20 the P
values for the second column are obtained from figure

2 x 18 = 36, to account for the two slabs loading the
7^9> multiplying by
purlin.
In table 7-19 P
7. 1*8,
values for the second column are obtained from
figure
multiplying by 18, the length of the purlin,
h.
Shear Stress Check.
V = 93-^ kips (table 7-19) V 93,toC) __ " ' v =

dt
r
16(0.307)
130
7-33i
EM 1110-345-417 15 Jan 58
Allowable v = 21,000 psi; OK (par. lt-05c) i Check Proportions for local Buckling,
16 UrkQ,
Ts
(par. 4-06d)
= 7.0,
t
= 0.503 f
10.503"
a = 15.0,
= 0.307
b/t f = 7.0/0.503 = 13.9 < 1^.0; OK a/t = 15.0/0.307 = 49.0 > 30; NG
Longitudinal stiffeners are required

t
*
= 3/8
> 0.307
g
ôAo o o
= 6j b
= 6t
g
= 6(3/8) = 2.25 in.
Use 2 plates 3/8 in. by 2-1/4 in. full
length velded continuously as described in
paragraph 4~o6d.
= (4.5)/0-307 = 14.6 < 22; OK e/t w = (10.12)/0.307 = 33 < ^0; OK Weight of added stiffener plates = 5-7 Ib/ft
c/t
p
7-3^
PRELBUMAEY DESIGN OP COLUMNS*
A single -story frame subject to latIt is therefore unnecessary to
eral load behaves essentially as a single-degree-of -freedom system with the
column displaying the spring properties.
substitute an equivalent system for the original structure, and the mass
and load factors that are necessary in the design of beams and slabs are
not used in the design of single-story frames.
The preliminary elastic design procedure of paragraph 6-12 is used
to determine the preliminary column size*
The equations of paragraph 7~06

are used in the pro-
cedure of paragraph
6-12 to replace some

of the factors used
in determining equiv-
alent single-degreeof -freedom systems.
For purposes
of preliminary design
the frame girders are as stoned to be
131
EM 1110-345-417 15 Jan 58
7-3!^
infinitely rigid thus simplifying the determination of the column spring

constant.
For spring constant computation the effective column height is
10.17 ft based on an assumed girder depth of 3 ft and clear height of 8.6?

ft.
The clear height is used in determining the maximum resistance of the
columns (par. 7-06).
In the preliminary design of steel columns it is desirable to be conservative to allow for the factors which are neglected in the preliminary
design.
These factors are:
(l) the effect of direct stress on the plastic
hinge moment and (2) the effect of girder flexibility.

a.
Design Loading.
The design lateral load on the frame is obtained
from the dynamic reactions at the top of the front wall slab.
However, for
the preliminary design procedure it is satisfactory to use the net lateral
overpressure curve (fig. 7- 43). In this case the total concentrated lateral
The effective wall load on the frame is the product of (l8)(6.l8)P net height determining the frame load is obtained from the wall clear height
.
and roof slab thickness

B
=
405kips
11.67
-,0

loading shown by figure 7.43 is defined by
T*0,046sec
Time
B , 25.3
(sec)
1000
T = 0.046 sec
b.
Mass Computation.
- 6 )2(l8)1 ^ TJaH3 l4(l] T walls
(000)
- 7^ 5 - 100
Roof slab
k ps
to linsM^=T. 2kl ps
Girders (estimated)
Columns (estimated)
1000
1000
= 7-^
= 5.2 kips
Connections = 0.1(7.2
-f
7.4) = 1.4 kips
(lOfo
of girders and purlins)
132
1110-345-417 15 Jan 58
Single-degree-of -freedom-system mass = total roof + girder + ^7-3 + 7-2 + 7.4 + 1.4 + 0.^3(73.5 + 5.2) 1/3 (vails and columns) =
2 = 3.09 kip-sec /ft
c.
First Trial
Actual Properties
Assume D.L.P. = 1.2 (experience)
= D.L.F.(B) = 1.2(405) =
^6
kips
Required Mp = Rmh/2n = 486(8.67)/2(4) = 52? kip-ft (eq ?. The effect of axial column load is neglected
s + z
..
"p - 527(12) fdy
-n^,
Smallest column that satisfies buckling criteria is 12

S =
163A
in.
Z = 186.0 in. 3 , I = 1071.7 in.
3 0.5(S + Z)= 174.5 in.
A = 35.31
in.
a/t w = 10.91/0.71 = 15- b < 22, OK; b/t_ = 12-32/1.106 X = 11.1 < 14.0, OK (par. 4-06d)
Mp
= 0.5(S + Z)f
(17!)..
5)Ul.6/12 = 605 kip-ft
R = m
d.
First
Tra1
Determination of D.L.F.
k = 12EIn/h 3
lg(30)l0(lQ71.7)^ = 10 ^ 200 kips/ft ]M(io. 17 y

=
6.28-^3.09/10,200
= 0.1C95 sec
T/Tn =0.0^6/0.1095= 0.42

D.L.F. ='1.07,
t
t /T = 0.93 (fig. m
5-20)
= 0.93(0.046) = 0.043 sec
The original load-time curve should be revised to obtain a closer ap-
proximation to the total impulse up to time t

t = 0.05 sec in figure 7-43 is:
The impulse up to
133
EM
15 Jan 58

T = 2H/B = 2(0.82)/25.3 = 0.065 sec T/Tn = 0.065/0.1095 = 0.593 D.L.F. =r 1.3, t /T = 0.70 (fig. 5*20) m
t
= 0.7(0.065) = 0.0^55 < 0.05
The revised idealized load-time curve is satisfactory
Required R
= D.L.F.(B) = 1.3(405) = 527 kips
< 558
kips; OK
of 527 kips is
There is no need
for further trials.
The required R
greater than original estimate of 486 kips but less than

12
available from
^120
e.
(558 kips).
Therefore the 12
^120
is accepted for preliminary
design.
Shear Stress Check of 12 VF120.
Estimated V max
1
R m
~~r
-*cfrjf
558 = 139.5 kips T
JL
t d
Allowable v = 21,000 psi; OK (par.

f.
1*~(
Slenderness Criterion for Beam
Columns,
(par.
-U- 08)
An approxi-
mate evaluation of the 12 W r 120 column slenderness criterion is made before
the column size is accepted for final analysis.
The criterion is:
< 1.0
(eq.
4.10)
(605) = 570 kip-ft, rough estimate based on ratio of required
R to available R m m
605 kip-ft
fA
0.114.
= 1^1.6(35.31) =
kips
P = D
= 3920 kips, at t = 0.01^55 sec (fig. m

(table 4.1)
K" = 0.50 (table 4.2)
L = 8.67 ft (clear height) r = 3.13 in. d = 13-12 in.

"b
= 12.32 in.
f
= 1.106
in.
EM
15 Jan 58
Substituting in equation (^.10) gives
P-lMS. 67)12(13. 12)1 + /392 \ [0,5(8. , 100(12.32X1.106) (WfO) [ 15(3-13) J = 0.132 + 0.281* = 0.1*16 < Ij OK
7-35
GIRDER DESIGN.
The design procedure for the frame girder is identical

To provide continuity in the pres-
to the girder design in paragraph 7-25,
entation of this building design example vithout excessive repetition, this girder design is limited to the computation of the resistance diagram and
the numerical integration computation to check the adequacy of the girder

resistance.
The same prelim16'-
inary computations performed

0"
1
6-0"
in paragraph 7-25 have
"been
'
'
performed for this girder but
are omitted for simplicity of

presentation.
The girder is
^*
""
"
designed as a fixed-pinned beam.

preliminary computations.
A 36 ^150 girder
is selected
by the
The design load curve (fig. 7-51) is presented.
The method of de-
termining the load curve from purlin reactions is the same as described in
paragraph 7-25
a.
The dynamic reaction data axe obtained from table 7-19-
Determination of Maximum Deflection by Numerical Integration.
Based on the preliminary computations which are omitted to reduce duplication the numerical integration analysis is performed for a 36 ^150 girder.
3 S = 503 in. , 3 Z = 580 in. ,
I = 9012 in.
Girder
+ Z)/2] = 1875 kip-ft (eq. 1*.2) d [(S The static loads develop a moment at the fixed support
Mp
= f
Static load moment = ^0 kip-ft

The moment in the girder to resist lateral frame motion is
I Mp ^ j
""
of column =
| j
(605) =
'**03
kip-ft (pars. 7-3ê and 7-11)
6M
1m
6 16
EI = 132(30)10 3 (9012) = 6o ' koo kips /ft

T
135
EM 1110-345-^17 15 Jan 58
7-35a
10
tsl
CO k.
(sdivj)
JL
d
uoi|DDay
uij
puo
136
EM 1110-345-417
15 Jan 58
The resistance diagram is shown by figure 7-52. Total concentrated mass = OAO kip-sec /ft
Total uniform mass = 0.075 kip- sec /ft Concentrated load and mass, KTM = 0.83
(table 6.1)
Concentrated load and uniform mass,
IM
'^
Deflection, ( tal:)le
y (ft)
^.l)
Figure 7.52. Resistance function
for 36 W^ 150 girder spanning
1/2 m)l V*
= 0.( .0156 sec J
20
ft,
T
(par.
fixed at one end and
Use At = 0.0015 sec < i = 0.00156 10

te
-
pinned at the other
5-08)
')(P
-
Rj(0.0015)'
0.55(0.075)
ft
The numerical integration in table 7.21 is based on the equation 2 a^ Le 53) &e dynamic reaction equayn + 1 = 3^n^*' + ^"n " ^ 1 (* tions are:
> -
V
V
= 0.17R + 0.17P (table 6.1)
= 0.33R + 0.33P 2 The P values for the second column in table 7-21 are obtained from
figure 7^51 multiplying by h to obtain the total concentrated load applied to the girder by the two purlins.
In table 7.21 the maximum R
satisfactory.
b.
= ^23 kips
<
538'
kips.
The design is
Shear Stress Check.

7. 21)
V = 253 kips (table
Multiply by 1.75 in accordance with paragraph 6-09

-
JL A
4dt
- gg3; 000(1- 75) _ o"t5 r\c \ Q^\ f r\

lOtOy-iQ.bc!.}
)
lft
pnn -v/vy
-ncH ^JoJ.
Allowable v = 21,000 psij OK (par. U-05c)

c.
Check Proportions of 36
W15Q
for Local Buckling.
b/t f = 11. 972/0. 9^ = 12.7 < 1^-0; OK a/t = 33.96/0.625 = 5^.3 > 30; NG
Longitudinal stiff eners are required (par. ^-
13T
m 1110-345-417
15 Jan 58
Table 7.21.
t
0.94"
1
= 5/8 = 0.625
3 ' 75 in.
b /t = 6; b = 6t = 6(5 /8) = s s s s
11,9
10.96"
Co ntinuousl
Weld
Use 2 longitudinal stiffeners, 2 plates 5/8 in. by 3-3A in. - full length
c/t w = (11.9
-
35.84"
3"
33,96"
0.
= 17.5 < 22 j OK
e/t w = (23.32
->
0.9^)/0.625 = 35.6<^0j
15-9
OK
Weight of added stiff ener plates =
138
7-36
EM 1110-3^5-417 15 Jan 58
FINAL DESIGN OF COLUMN,
The column design was begun in paragraph
7-36
7-34.
The final steps in the column design are illustrated by this paraThe steps which follow all lead to the determination of the lateral
graph.
deflection of the top of the columns by a numerical integration. In the preliminary design of the column (par. 7-3*0 some of the factors which af-
fect the maximum deflection of the column are neglected to simplify the computations. These factors which, are now considered are: the variation
of plastic hinge moment with direct stress, the variation of column resistance with lateral deflection, the effect of girder flexibility on the
stiffness of the columns, the difference between the load on the wall slab
and the dynamic reactions from the wall which are used as the lateral design load for the frame columns.
For all pertinent dimensions refer to paragraph 7-3^.
a.
Mass Computation,
(par. 7-3^"b)
Walls =73-5 kips, roof slab = 57.3 kips, purlins

= 4.2 kips
=7.2
kips
Girders =
= 7-9 kips
Connections = 0.1(7.2 + 7-9) = 1.5 kips
Single-degree-of -freedom mass = total roof + 1/3 (columns + walls)

57-3 + 7*2 + 7.9 + 1-5 +0-33(73*5- + fr.2) " 99-8 32.2 32.2 2 =3.1 kip-sec /ft
b.
Column Properties.
,
12 \F120, I = 1071.7 in.
3 0.5(S + Z) = 17^*7 in - > A
3 3 S = 163. 4 in. , Z = 186.0 in. , 2 = 35-31 in. , b = 12.32 in.,
t- = 1.106 in., a = 10.91 in., t " = 0.71 in., d = 13-12 in., x

r
c.
=3-13
in.
Column Interaction Design Data.

M,
Bie plastic
Mnge
moment, plastic
axial load, and the values of

properties .
and
P,
are computed below from the column
M
P
p
fCS
+ Z)0.5 =
(17^-7) = 606 kip-ft

= 1^70 kips
(eq. t.
(eq.
U.2)
= f
A = iH.6(35.3l)
139
EM 1110-345-417 15 Jan 58
7-36d
(eq.
4.12)
-
1.6
[2(12.32)(1. 106 )
2 + 0. 5(0.71)13. 12
2 2(0.71t)(l.l06)
]
= 288 kips
(eq.
4.11)
fe.6
2 2 6(13.12)(1.106) + 4(1. 106 )
= 555 kip-ft
12(3X13.12)
12.32(1. 106 )[3(13. 12 )
]j
For
/P
PA
/ 11*70
P
288
1470
For P
<
= 606
= 606 -
(eq.
d.
Effect of Girder Flexibility,
The relative flexibility of the
girders reduces the spring constant
in the elastic range from the value
obtained in paragraph
(par. 7-08).
7-3*1-
for the assumption of infinitely stiff girders

)
(See par. 7-23d.
To obtain this revised value of
simple sidesvay analysis of the frame is performed.
From the sides-way
analysis the spring constant is the magnitude of the lateral force re-
quired to cause a unit displacement.

In figure 7.55 (page 1^5) the initial spring constant is applicable
only up to the formation of the first hinge.
However , to simplify the de-
sign procedure, this value is assumed to hold up to the plastic resistance
In the sidesvay 'analysis (fig. 7.53) the frame dimensions are based
on the center line dimensions of the girders and columns.
The lateral de-
flection for -which the F.E.M. at top and bottom of each column is 1000
kip-ft is
2 x = (F.E.M. )h /6EI
140
EM 1110-3^5-417 15 Jan 58
860 kips
Figure 7.53.
moment distribution Sidesway frame analysis by
"
ft
6(30)10 (10T1.T) 2M _ 2(863 + 957 +
IT
978) = 734 kl
10.17
. 951.0 kipS/ft
Both horizontal and vertical loads are considered. The F lateral load for the numerical integration Q (table 7.22, page 144) is obe
.
Loading.
tained from the V

namic
of the numerical integration dynamic reaction column in paragraph 7-31 (table 7-l6). The dyanalysis of the front vail slabs are multiplied by 18, the width of reaction values for a 1-ft width
one bay of the building. After the dynamic reactions of the front wall the applied load ( at t = 0.018 sec) the slab have decreased to the level of
F n values are taken from the net lateral overpressure curve

For Pnet
F
_ ~
= i6. P
(fig.
1000
net
nf net
These data are plotted in figure 7-5^

for the second column of table 7-22.
to give the frame lateral design load
Tbe dimension 6.18 is equal to one-
half the clear height of the wall plus

6 j-l- -!
the roof slab thickness.
+ o.35 = 6.18 ft
the average
P in table 7.22 is obtained by multiplying The total vertical load n roof overpressure (fig- 7-WO [^(l8)i^]/ 100 o = 1*0 and
EM
15 Jan 58
7-36e
600
0.01
0.02
0,03
f
0,04
0,05
Time
Figure 7.54.
(sec)
Frame design
lateral load
adding to that the dead weight of the roof system 57 .3+7.2

= 73*9 kips.
+7-9+ 15
The average roof overpressure is used because in the numeri-
cal analysis
oly
the average column load is needed.
This procedure neg-
lects the dynamic effect of the roof slab, purlins, and girder on the
vertical blast loads.
7-36f
M
15 Jan 58
f
.
Computation of Deflection of Frame by Numerical Integration,

)
(See table 7*22.
Dae (P-)
values are the average axial column loads ob-
tained by dividing the total vertical load P

The (P-)
by the number of columns.
values are used to determine the corresponding values of (1L) by Prom the value of (M_J the maximum the relationships of paragraph 7-36c
resistance is obtained by the relation
a,(Mj
px
R
is equal to kx = in the elastic range* n 95^0x^
The expression
~c
indicates the decrease in resistance corresponding to the increase in
bending moment resulting from the eccentric loading

The basic equation for the numerical integration in table 7-22 is
- 1
(table
To check the slenderness criteria (par. 4-08) the folloving equation is
evaluated for each time interval

r K'Ld 100bt
|_
1
*D P p
l5r
K" = 0.50 (table 4.2)
K = O.lk (table ^.l),
L = 8.6? ft (clear height), b = 12.32 in., d = 13-12 in. t = 1.106 in., f

*5>
I"
r = 3.13 in.
Mp
^0.1*0(8.67)12(13.12)1 100(12.32)1.106 ^J |_
^ P
p
[0.50(8.67)121 [ 15(3-13) J
"~
^x
p p The time interval At = 0.002 sec used in table 7' 22 is based on the natural period T
At
2jt-^m7k
6.28-^3.1/95^0
= 0.113 sec.
T
-jg
2^2.
= 0.0113 (par. 5-08)
The analysis in table 7.22 shows that the maximum deflection
EM 1110-3^5-^17
15 Jan 58
7-36f
XAOO MD
4
CM
CM o HMD CA O oH
ro,
-
CM
C^D-I-HVO
lA\r\
C^-OJÔ
8 O OrHCM^ OOOOOO
OOOOCDCDOOOOCDCDOOOOCDCDOOOCÔOO O
CM
oooooooo o oooooooooo ^t-^T 1A UMTMA XA OOOOOO HHrHovjCVJOsJ

O
--
OOO QOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOQOOOOQO 80000000000000000000000000 oo ooooooooooooooooooooooo CDOOCDOOOOOOOOOCDOOCDOOOOO

CM GO
rH 00
IAOO
CO-CM c\JH
I
HH
1
v
to
\A
C--
coir\
O H o-\ o
CM
l>-
O\
CM
covO CA
XAvO CO H CM O\vO rno oo C--OOCOCNO o H cMfnfn-zt

ON
f-1
CM
CM Ox
-
D-^t
HHHHH HH
CM
CM
--d--it-^t
HHH
C*~
CA CM
o o o o rHH O OO
O\\O
C**
ON ONOO
s ^*~* C *~
OOH HHCM
p
ft
CO
p,
s
CM t<
*j
CMtACM C^-vO CMHcO ONCOCMO O 1AXAMD OOCMxO-^tvO^-COGOCM C CAOvOCM r-OOoO CAXAOH fnMDO-Jd C^H-^rc3Or-! o^xOcoOO
OO
CM.J"LA
OOO
O
lA\AXAXAO*LAcnOO CMlAlAÔ O CMÔcO O co HOD co oseo-d'-rtCM LA_itrniCM CM H O o\coco

<
CM-^t
CM-^T
HH
CM
0^^ 1A lA-d- CM
CM.
c^-Ô CMCMCMCMCMHHHHH
CO
OH
-p
1
-
ft
co
->
ft -H
miAvOCOO\H
HHrH
H
o-MA OO
HOO
o o
LA
II
(X,
CM
vOI>-OOOOONOOHrHlCMC\JC\JCM CMOJCM
O CMoO_^H
_
ONCO
HHHHrHrHHHr-iHrH
oo o o
OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO ooooooooooooooooooooooooo
O CM-d-vOcp O CM-d-ÔoO OCM-^tÔoO O OJ-d'VOcOO rHrHHHH CMCMCMCMCMrAr^rAc^ c^\^ ^- ^ -=$ -d" 1A
7-36g
EM
(xn ) max = 0.056 exceeds the limiting elastic
1110-345-11-17
15 Jan 58
R
deflection
Rm
0.922 M D
500 = 0.053,
small
r
j
x~Mox5mum Deflection
k
I
s
i
amount of plastic action is considered acceptable
flk,
9540kips/ft
for purposes of this example.

slenderness criteria equation
At t = 0.04 sec the
9540
Deflection, x(ft)
Figure 7.55. Frame resistance diagram
= 0.36U
g.
< 1.0,
.*.
OK
Shear Stress Check.
= 5 5
Mps
= 126 -
(table
Allowable v = 21,000 psi; OK (par. ^-
NUMERICAL EXAMPLE^ DESIGN OF A ONE-STORY REINFORCED -CONCRETE FRAME BUILDING, PIASTIC DEFORMATION PERMITTED
^""37
GENERAL*
This numerical example presents the design of the important
elements of one bay of a windovless one-story, reinforced-concrete frame

"building.
Included are the design of the vail slab, roof slab, roof girder,
The foundation design is not included because that design
and columns.
procedure is illustrated by paragraph 7-27

In this example all elements with the exception of the girder are
permitted to deform plastically.
The reason for designing the girder in
the elastic range is covered in paragraph
7-H
The limiting deflections'
are established on the basis of paragraph 6-26.

The structure consists of reinforced-concrete vail slabs spanning
vertically with one-way reinforcement.
The wall slab is supported at the

The roof slab
bottom by the foundation and at the top by the roof slab.
is also a one-way slab spanning continuously over the reinforced concrete
frames.
The roof girders are tee beams formed by the roof slab and rectan-
gular girder stems.
The columns are rectangular tied columns symmetrically
reinforced in the strong direction.
EM
15 Jan 58
44' - 3"
7-38
20'-0"
Cross Section
'l8'-0
90'
Plan
Figure 7.56.
Plan and section of reinforced-concrete building
7-38
DESIGN PROCEDURE >
The design procedure illustrated
"by
this example
is essentially the same as the procedure detailed in paragraph 7-l8 for the
plastic design of a steel frame "building with reinforced-concrete walls and

roof.
7-39
LOAD DETERMIMATIOIJ^
In this example only the completed overpressure
curves are presented.
The computation of the overpressure variation is ex-
plained in detail in EM 1110-3^5-413 and illustrated again in paragraph

7-19.
The design overpressure of 10 psl is selected arbitrarily.

(1) Incident overpressure vs time (fig. 7-57) (2) Front face overpressure vs time (fig. 7.58)
(3) Rear face overpressure vs time (fig.
759)
(4) Net lateral overpressure vs time (fig. 7.60)
(5) Average roof overpressure vs time (fig. 7.6l)
7-39
EM 1110-3^5-417 15 Jan 58
03
*
CJ
eco
O
*J
c
1)
EM 1110-3^5-417
15 Jan 58
7-39
148
7-39
EM 1110-3^5-^17 15 Jan 58
<u
10
<u
EM 1110-3^5-^17 15 Jan 58
7-39
(i.sd)
*9"d*3jnss9jdJ9AO
150
7-39
EM 1110 -3^5 JH7

15 Jan 58
I
2
i
!
CD
* OOJ
CO
CM
(tsd)
d *8jnssajdjaAO jooy
151
EM 1110-3^5-10.7
15 Jan 58
74o
The wall slab is designed as a reinforced con-
7-^0
DESIGN OF WALL SLAB.
crete beam one foot in width fixed at the foundation and pinned at the roof
where it is framed into a thin slab.
The
wall slab is designed for plastic action

so that a plastic hinge will be developed
first at the foundation and then at mid15.83'
L= 15.83'
span when the slab is subjected to the design loading.

The clear height of the
slab is considered the design span length.
The preliminary design procedure
for plastic design is described and il-
lustrated by an example in paragraph 6-11.

The dead load stresses are neglected for a vertical wall slab.
a.
Design Loading*
loading shown by figure 7-58 is defined by:

57.7 kips
1000
T = 0.062 sec
H ,
f=
b.
O.062
sec
Time
(sec)
Elastic range:
KT
= 0.58,
E. = OA5,
= 0.78
= 0.26R + 0.12P,
0.14-3R
+ 0.19P

0.50,
'
78
V = 0.39R + 0.11P
152
7-40c
EM 1110-345-417
15 Jan 58
Plastic range:
1^
= 0.50,
KM
-33,
KIM
'
66
= 0.38R + 0.12P
Average values:
v
j
_ (Qo64 + 0.50) = _ "" 0.57 2
(0.50 + 0.33)
c.
First Trial
Actual Properties *
Assume p = 0*015 (par. 4Let op = 5 (par. 6-26)

Assume C
R
=
075
(experience)
= C B = 0.75(57^7) = ^3-3 kips R

(eg.
4.16)
= Pf
^bd-
= 0.015(52)(l)d
fl -
I'Y/OJM^]
>3 >
= 0.688d2 kip-ft (d
in inches)
=
b.
(I2)0.688d 15.83
"
.
~ d _ 9 ' 1:L
Try
= 10,5 in., ML = 0.688(9. 25 ) 2
d = 9,25 in.,
p = 0.015,
np = 0.15
=58.9 kip-ft
.
m
o
Jffe L
=
9.25
M^2i 15*o3
U.6
10.5
klps
"No. 8
= (10.5) 3 = 1158 in.
153
EM 1110-345-417
15 Jan 58
I.
= bd?
\~
I
+ np(l
k)*
I
=
I
= 0.905d3 = 0.905(9.25) 3 = 716 InA I = 0.5(l + I ) = 0.5(1158 + 716) = 937 a t g

. (160) 3 (10) 937 = 78? kps/ft 3 144(15.83 )
3
ym = op
5(0.0567) = 0.2835 ft (par. 6-26)
Mass m =
d.
0.06^5 kip-sec /ft

-
First Trial
me
=
=
^m =
==
0-57(^.6) = 25.4 kips (eq 6.12)

(eq.
KH
0.57(1.79) = 1.02 kip-sec
6.8)
m
(He )
= 0.0271 kip-sec 2/ft (eq 6.2) 2 r

.
-5T = 2* n
e.
2(0! 0271)
' 19 20 f
'
^? =
-
6.
28-^0. 78(0. 06U5)/787
= 0.050 sec (eq
First Trial
C C
= T/T = 0.062/0.050 = 1.24 n = R /B = 1A.6/57-7 = 0.77 (eqs 6.15, 6.l6) m
t^T
t
= 0.71 (fig. 5.29)
= (0.71)0.062 = 0.044 sec
Ine idealized load-time variation is considered to be a satisfactory
approximation to the actual front face overpressure curve (fig. 7-58) up to t = 0.044 sec (par. 5-13).
154
EM
15 Jan 58
= 0.31 (fig. 5.27) w W = C W = 0,31(19.20) = m 5-95 W P E = R (y = 25 *^ 5

c
ft-kips
-
(eg.
6.1?)
me
= 6.145 ft-kips (eq.6,18)
t-2835
0.5(0.0567)]
E >
W,
therefore the selected proportions are satisfactory

slab was tried and found to be unsatisfactory.
as a pre-
liminary design.
A
f*
10- in.
Use 10.5-in. slab.
It is now necessary to
select the reimporting steel for the critical cross sections. At the fixed end of the wall
the cover requirement results in a smaller value of d = 8.O in. than at midspan, d = 9.25
in.
No.
Sot 5"
Midspon and Pinned End
125"
To achieve approximately the same
at
2^
both critical cross sections several values of p are investigated to obtained the value of p
for "which
12
= 58.9 kip-ft
2.5"
Cover /No. 8 of 5"
8.Cf
10.51
Fixed End
plot of equation
simplifies this computation.
From such a plot
At the fixed end

Estimated V
max
= 0.5R = 0.5(^-6) = 22.3 kips m
Allowable u = 0.15f^ = 0.15(3000) =

Tf, ~ 10 _
^0
psi
8^22,300) _ 7 ' ! in - T 1 in>

0.017(12)8.0 = 1.63 in.
in.
,
A s = pbd =
Try #6 at 5 in., A g = 1-90

A*b
'
So = 7-5 in.
198
the pinned end

= l/3E = m
155
EM 1110-3^5 -417
15 Jan 58 So _
JL
ujd
_ 8(14,900)
_ k "-L in * ~ 4 L
:
= pbd = 0.017(12)9.25 = 1.89 in.
Ery #8 at 5 in.,
= 1.9 In.
So = 7-5 in.
^termination of Maximum Deflection and Dynamic Reactions

pf
1
"
"fcn
Numerical Integration*
ay 1 =
1.7f!
,25 )
dcj
1-7(3.97
= 66.0 kip-ft
(eq.
k.~.
Mpg
I = g
I . t
= 0.0198(52)(1)(8.0) 2
[l
TDli
iY^^)^]
= 56.0 kip-ft
4 3 /i2 = (10.5) = 1158 in.

+ np(l
-
M
'
[^
5(l
g
k)
= 12( 9 .25) 3
+ 0.171(1
o.
= 775 in.
Z
**)
= 0-5(1158 + 775) = 967 in.
10-5(150)15.83 = 9 n7ft 2 -78 kips 12(1000)

.
.
Mass m =
Elastic range:
= 0.06^5 kiP -sec/ft
kips/ft
OAlt(l5.83)
.o + 2(66.0)] = J+7.5 kips
= 386
"
156
EM
15 Jan 58
v J
ep
y. J
. 0.0301. ep
. O .o8o ft
Plastic
rapfie:
Rm = 47.5 By providing equal areas under the "effective resistance" line and
tlie
= 0.064l ft (fig. 7-62). computed elasto-plastic resistance line, YE
kipS/lt
Maximum
Deflection
ym
5y
47.5
6.26^(fc^- 0.0517
sec
9 ?0 klps/f t 740Mps/ft
ym = ap y
= 5(0.o61u) = 0.3205 ft
386 kips/ft
0.0304 ft 0.064 ft * 0.080 ft
1
The basic equation for the numerical
integration in table 7-23" is yn + 1 2 = y (At) + 2y - yn _ i (table 5-3) n n

-
Deflection, y(ft)
n-
'" 2
I
Table
7.23.
Figure 7.62. Resistance function for 10-l/2-in. slab spanning 15.83 ft, fixed at one end and pinned
at the other
157
EM 1110-3^5-^17
15 Jan 58
(Pn -
7-tah
R )25(10)-
6
..
g.7a(0.0o45)
(Pn -
' ^-97(10)' (P n
R ) ft, elastic range Q R
6 )25(10).
' .78(0.0645) v
= *-97(H>r*(P
6
.
Q ) ft, elasto-plastic
range
(P
R )25(10)"
0.66(0.(Xfr5)
= 5.87(lO)- 4 (P n
Rj
ft, plastic range
The time interval At = 0.005 sec is approximately T /10 = 0.0051? sec

(par. 5-08).
The dynamic reaction equations are listed in paragraph 7-Ôb.
The P
values for the second column are obtained from figure 7.58, multiplying by 1H( 15.83 J/1000 = 2.28.
The maximum deflection (y ) in table 7.23, is 0.20^ ft, n max , computed
vhich is less than the allowable y

3 - 2 ' OK
h.
of 0.3205 ft.
Thus
For bottom of wall (fixed end of
idealized slab):
= 2 3-
^P 3
(table 7.23)
f
For no shear reinforcement, allowable v = O.CA-f + 5000p v = 0.0^(3000) + 5000(0.0171) = 120 + 85 = 205 psi
(eq. U.
v =
8V - 8(23,200) = ; 274 psi Tbd 7(S )8.0^

.,
Shear reinforcement required for 27^ - 205 = 69 psi
Contribution of shear reinforcement to allowable shear stress = rf

u
Try 1 #3,
As
?n/'
= 0.11 in. 1
\
A
r =
^r =
= 0.0017;
/.
s = 6.5 in.,
use s = 6 in.
For top of wall (pinned end of idealized slab)
V v = 23.2 kips (table 7-23)

v = 205 psi y
158
EM 1110-345-417
15 Jan 58
8v Tbd
8(23,20 200) = 240 psi 7(12)9- 25
Shear reinforcement required
for 2^0
205 = 35 psi
r =
35AO,000 = 0.00088
Try 1 #2,
As
0.05
= 0.05 in.
r =
bs
= 0.00088;
use s =
Bond:
Allowable u =
= yn 210
il-50
0.15^ =0.15(3000)
_ ~
psi
_ 8(23,000) ~
_ ~
JL
ujd
7(^50X8.0)
''
J ln<
Use #8 at 5 in. ,
So = 7-5 in., A S = 1.9

i.
in.
Summary.
10-1/2-in. slab (see sketch above)
7-14-1
DESIGN OF ROOF SLAB.
The roof is formed by a one-way slab spanning

This manual is limited
continuously over the frame bents spaced at 18 ft.
to consideration of single -span

elements.
To account for the con-
S
I
tinuity of the slab it is designed as a fixed-end beam of l8-ft span.

Since plastic behavior is desired
tlie design procedure of paragraph
6-11 is followed.
The permissible
L
1
i
deflection is established in ac-
18.0'
cor dance with paragraph 6-26 and
the static loads are allowed for by reducing the resistance.

a.
Design loading.
The roof slab spanning between frames in a long
building has different design conditions from the roof framing over purlins
in a similar building
(par. 7-22).
159
EM
15 Jan 58
For the blast wave moving parallel to the long axis of the building the overpressure variation with time at all points is the same. However,
for any slab element the overpressure along the span varies with time as a
result of the lag time
length of slab velocity of blast wave
18
~~
1403
= 0.0128 sec
For this case the average slab loading is determined by introducing

the rise time equal to
overpressure.
t..
J-Cigj
as indicated in figure 7*63 to the incident
For the blast wave moving perpendicular to the long axis of the
building the overpressure variation with time at all points is different as

a result of vortex action.
However, at any slab element the overpressureIf the response
time variation may be treated as constant across the span.
is rapid, i.e., before the vortex action takes place, the slab element is
subjected to the incident overpressure uniformly distributed.

In this example the preliminary design loading for the roof slab is
the incident overpressure.
For checking the preliminary design both direc-
tions of loading are considered and two numerical integrations are presented (tables 7-24 and 7-25, page 167).
The design load as idealized from the computed loading shown by
B*25.9ki P s
figure 7-57 is defined by:
B = 10 psi =
^loff"^
= 25-9 kips
T = 0.38 sec
T= 0.38 sec
Time (sec)
1 H _ BT _ (25.9)Q38 _
--g---
b.
Elastic range:
KT
= 0.53.
O.M,
k V = 0.36R + 0.14P
= 0.64,
=
i
K^
^=0.50,
ep
5L-
KIM
'
78
160
EM 1110-3^5-417
15 Jan 58
Q
.3
<fc
**
*i
Cu
C3
""-A
"C
oT
0)
B-
(jsd)
qois
161
EM
1110-31*5-1*17
7-4lc
15 Jan 58
Plastic range:
1^=
0.50,
KJJ
= 0.33.
KIM
66
D + M ^ R = I fu<Ps j. "Pm^ (M m
V = 0.38R + 0.12P
Average values:
= 0.5(0.64 + 0.50) = 0.57 = 0.5(0.50 + 0.33) = 0.42
= 0.5(0.78 + 0.77) = 0.77
K^
KJJ
307EI/L
c.
First Trial
Actual Properties.
'
"ft,
"to
'
*P
Assume p = 0.015 (par. ^Let op = 5 (par- 6 -
Assume CL = 1.0 (experience)
= 1.0^25-9) = 25.9 kips
pf
0.015(52)(Dd
(d
in
;.
d = 6 . 5in .
= 0.015 Try h = 8 in., d = 6.75 in., P
Mp
No.
= 0.688(6. 75
f
lo
= 31-^ kip-ft
Cover
,
m.
.
"*
(8
-)
3 ' 511 In.
0.15(1
= 0.905d3 = 0.905(6. 75
3
)
o.
= 278 in.
162
7-4ld = 0.5(l
EM 1110-345-417
15 Jan 58
I
+ I ) = 0.5(511 +278) = 394 t

3
307EI . (3 (3Q7)3(10) 394

11
3 (I8) l44
7,
ym = op yE = 5(0.0645) = 0.3225 ft (par. 6-26)

Weight =
Mass
d.
[8|0>
+ 6
J
_18_ = 1>91Jdps
m = ^|2|
2 = 0.0591 kip-sec /ft

- Eq.xiivalent System.
First "Trial
= IOR
TJ
Properties.
(eq. (eq.
me
- 0.57(27.9) = 15.9 kips
6.12)
= 0.57(4.92) = 2.8 kip-sec
6.2) 2
me =
V
(TL
-^2 ('59l) =
0.02W kip-sec /ft (ea 6.2)
= 6.28Jo.77(0.059l)A32 = 0.0645 sec

e.

= T/T = 0.38/0.0645 = 5-9 n
C_ =
E /B = 27.9/25.9 = 1.08 m
(eq.s
6.15, 6.l6)
t /T = 0.17 (fig* 5*29) m'

t
= (017)0.38 = 0.0646 sec

(par.
Idealized load-time curve is satisfactory at t = 0.0646 sec

C
5-13)
= 0.02 (fig. 5.27)

(eq.
Wm = CwWp = 0.02(158) =3-16 ft-kips
6.17)
E^
me (ym
0.5yE ) = 15-9 [0.3225
0.5(0.0645)]
= 4.62 ft-kips (eq 6.18)
E >
W,
liminary design.
163
EM 1110-3^5-417 15 Jan 58
Try to reduce slab to bring
f.
closer to
Second Trial
= ^-r-
Actual Properties.
-v
==
0,25Wm + 0,75E
'
^m
16M
P
?
LI
0.25(3.16) + 4.82(0.7?) * ^^- *
5yE }
= o* * kips 26,6
i
<:
(eq.6.1Q)
(0.57)[0.3225
2
x = 25 e 6
0.5(0.06^)]
(l6)Q.688d = ^ L-^ lo
.
. .
, d =
... 66 in*
in,,
Try ^ = 7^75 in^ d = 6, 50

6.5"
W
p = 0015
775"
.ll2g
2 2 Mp = 0688d = 0.688(6. 5) = 29.1 kip-ft
No.
m
"g
T5
= ^-75) 3 0.
in.
I
I
= 0.905d 3 =
905(6. 50)
3 = 2%8 in.
-F
(k = 0.
= 0.5(1 + a g
I. )
= 0.5(^65
2k8)
=3^
/ft
k
in.
307|I J
= (307)3(10)356 = 3 (18) 1^
0.066 ft
ym = op yE = 5(0.066) = 0.330 ft (par. 6-26)
Mass m =
i^| 3^;.^
2 = 0.0575 kip-sec /ft

-
g.
Second Trial
= KJR
jj
R
nie
= 0.57(25.9) = 1^.75 kiPS (eq 6.12) m = 0.57(^.92) = 2.8 kip-sec (eq. 6.2) 2 = OA2(0.0575) = 0.02^2 kip-sec /ft (eq 6.2) 2
(H
2(0.0242;
= 162 ft-kips (eq 6.10)

28-y/0. 77(0.0575)/391
T = n
= 6.
= 0.0667 sec
164
I.
7 " lh
h.
EM 1110-345-417
15 Jan 58
Work Done vs Energy Absorption Capacity. C = T/T = 0.38/0.0667 = 5-7 T n

R
=
Rn/B = 2 5'9/25.9 - 1.0 (eqs 6.15, 6.16)

5.29)
t /T = 0.24 (fig. m
(0.24)0.38 0.091 sec m Idealized load-time curve is
satisfactory at time t = 0.091
(par. 5-13)
Cw = 0.028 (fig. 5.27)
Wm
= C
W = W P
-
-28(l62) = 4.55 ft-kips (eq 6.17)

0.5yE ) = 14.75 [0.330
-
= R
me (ym
0.5(0.066)]
= 4.38 ft-kips (eq 6.18)
E *
W,
liminary design.
i.
Estimated
V^
= 0.5R
= 6.5(25.9) = 12.9 kips
Allowable u =
.,
0.15^
= 0.15(3000) = 450 psi (par. 4-09)
'J
_ ~
V
ujd
_ 8(12,900) _ ~ ~ 450(7)6.5
2
J-;
.
.
2 Try #7 at 6 in., A g = 1.2 in. , So = 5-5 in., p = = -|
= 0.0152
np = 10(0.0152) = 0.152, h = 7.75 in., d = 6.56 in.

Determination of Maximum Deflection and Dynamic Reactions by Numerical Integration.
j>
= 30.4 kip-ft (eq 4.16) I
g t
= bh 3/12 = (7-75) 3 = 465 in. = bd3
1*
I
I
1^gj
+ np(l
k)
= 0.905(d3 ) = 0.0905(6. 56) 3 = 256 in.

1*
Or
= 0.5(1- + L.) = 0.5(465 + 256) = 360 in. U
165
EM 1110-3^5-^17 15 Jan 58
Mass m
,=
~f = 0.0575
$C.*d.
2 kip-sec /ft
Elastic range:
lm
~TT
weight =
3
'
18
1 ' 86 = 18 '3 ki*> s
*i-i
R
'1m
y
(384)3(10) 360 _
18.
e ~. k.
= 0.0381 ft
m
ep
nr
TCi ^ht 1
,
-îF2
^ ^^
-
k
p
kips/ft
_
TD
m
K ep
Ln
ep
= 0>Q38l + 25.1
5b
18.3 = 0>03Ql + 0<0?1 = Q
18
ft,
fixed, at both
ends
= 6.
28^0. 77(0. 0575)/383
= 0.067^ sec
The basic equation for the numerical integrations in tables 7.24 and
r\
7-25 is yn +
]_
= y ( At n
^n
"
yn
( talDle
5-3) where
166
r
EM 1110-3^5 -*
15 Jan 58
Table
7.24.
Determination of Maximum Deflection and Dynamic Reactions for Roof Slab, Incident Overpressure (Modified for Rise Time)
Table
7.25,
Determination of Maximum Deflection and Dynamic Reactions for Roof Slab 9 Incident Overpressure (No Rise Time)
167
EM lilO -3^5-1(17
15 Jan 58
7 -ink
At)
"
(P
-
0.77(0.0575
1.107(lO^)(Pn
n ) ft, elastic range
0.78(0.0573)
(P
-
)(lf9)l<r
0.66(0.057$)
1.093(lO)(Pn
n ) ft, elasto-plastic
range
1.29l(lO^)(Pn
The time interval At = 0.007 sec is approximately T /10 = 0.0067^ sec

(par. 5-08).
The dynamic reaction equations are listed in paragraph 7-^lb.
In table 7-2^ the slah analysis considers the loading resulting from the
shock wave moving along the long axis of the building (incident over-
pressure modified for rise time).
The P
values for the second column are
obtained from figures 7-57 and 7.63, multiplying by lWf(l8)/1000 = 2-59= 0.2927 < 0.3275. The slab is not critical for this condition (y ) n iiiOjX In table 7-25 the slab analysis considers the loading resulting from
the shock wave moving along the short axis of the building (local roof
overpressure with no time of rise).
The P
values for the second column

1"h-
are obtained from figure 7-57; multiplying by 2-59-
e slab is critical
= 0-3621 > 0.3275* for this case and in fact the maximum deflection (y ) n max This is accepted as a satisfactory design since
0.3621
is close enough to
k.
value of
established above.

=
max
12A
kips (table
Allowable v
= O.OJ-kT + 5000p (eq.

= 196 psi
v
i/
O.OM3000) + 5000(0.0152) = 120 + 76

(DO.
v = T~~ =
70%
=
= 178 psi; OK, no shear reinforcement required
U =
8V
8(l,lK)0) = ono 39 psl

)6.56
168
EM
mo -3
'
15 Jan
Allowable u = 0.15f
1.
'
58
0.15(3000) = ^50 psi; OK
Summary.
7-3A-in. slab
p = 0.0152
Zo = 5-5 in.
7-^2
PREIIMITORY CQnJMN DESIGN.
It has been found desirable to
maKe a
the preliminary design of the column before designing the girders because column resisting moment is a factor in design of the girder (par. 7-i.l).
A single-story frame subject to lateral load behaves essentially as a single-degree-of -freedom system* In determining the requirements Tor the columns which are the springs of this system it is not necessary to ui>e the
equivalent system technique used in designing all elements.
Using the principles of paragraph 6-11 and equations from
paragraph
7-06 provides a procedure for obtaining preliminary column sizes. In the preliminary design the girders are assumed to be infinite.!;/
rigid to simplify the analysis. In determining the spring constant, the column height is 1^.75 ft from the center line of the girder to the top of
the
footing.
The resistance computation is
based on the clear height
hc
= 13-0 ft.
If the first trial section is over strength or under strength it
io
de-
In this plastic column design, since adequacy of the selected section is based on a comparison of E , the
sirable
to make a second trial.
the
en-
eirgy absorption capacity with W , the work done on the frame, successive -trials are obtained by estimating a design energy level somewhere bet-ween
the computed values
of
and
W m
for use in the equation

_ energy ~~ x
for
set
determining the new trial
If W
> E
the energy level should, be
at W
so that
Rm
=^ x
Hovever,
if
E > W
as in the following example, the intermediate
energy
level may
be obtained as illustrated on the following page.
169
EM
15 Jan 58
a.
Design loading.
The design lateral load on the frame is obtained

However y for
from the dynamic reactions at the top of the front vail slab.
a preliminary design it is satisfactory to use the net lateral overpressure

curve (fig. 7-6o).
In computing the total concentrated lateral load on the frame it is
assumed that the wall slab transmits the blast loads equally to the roof
slab and foundation,
This is generally conservative for the frame because,
in the elastic phase^ the dynamic reaction at the roof is less than that at the foundation (table 6.1).

B=562ki P s
loading shown by figure
76o
is defined by:
25-3(1^)18
B = 25*3
= 562 kips
T= 0.062sec
Time (sec)
1000
T = 0*062 sec
BT
bo
Mass Computation.
, 82 . = 25-2 kips
Roof
Girder (assumed)
3 columns (assumed)
kips
= 11>? kips - 7^.8 kips
slabs
Iâss
of s-ingle-degree-of -freedom system = total (roof + girder) +
82.0
c.
kip . sec /ft
First Trial
Actual Properties.
Assume p = 0^015 (par* lt-10)

Let ap = 6 (par, 6-26)
Assume CL = 0,50 (experience)
= CJB = 0-50(562) = 281 kips K
= 610 kip-ft
170
7-42c
EM 1110-345-417 15 Jan 58
Approximate average roof pressure = 6.5 psi (estimated in fig. 7,61)
Average blast load per column =
ill
Dead load per column = 1/3(82*0 + 25*2) = 36*0 kips Average column design load P = 248 + 36 = 284 kips
=
Vdyd
f
'
(eq. 4.
32)
Let p = p
= 0.015, d
= (t
4.5) in., d" = 2.25 in.
b = 12 in*,
= pbt
Substituting into previous M_ equation

610(12) = 0.015(l2)t(52)(t
-
4.5) + 284 7320 =
935t
2 42t + l42t
1015
Solving t =
250
in.
Try b = 12 in., t = 26 in,
M Mp
= 0.015(12 )26(52)(26
^^
4.5) *
12
1 1.7(12)3 .9J
Mp
!!
= 436 + 223 = 659 kip-ft
d /d = 2.25/23^75 = 0.0948
For p = p
=0.015 and n
-
= 10
m = np + (n
q.
l)p
= 0.15 + 9(0.015) = 0,285
= np + (n
l)p' ^- = 0.15 + 9(0.015)0.09U8 = 0.1628
k = 0.35 (table 11 RCDH of ACl)

I
. bd 3
^_
+ / (n
,
^,
i,,*
ov/^_\ +
l^.\
+
J
^(i
2
(0.09J+8)
o
,
1^J1 tq
}
9(0.015)
-
I I
= bt3/l2 = 26
^ 3
+ 0.15(1
2
0.35 )
)i 1*"
= 13,800 in.
= 17,576 in.
ii
= 0.5(l
I.) = 15,700
k =
, 36?0
171
EM 1110-345-417
15 Jan 58
2n
c
"
"
13-0
kiT)S klps
R /k = 304/3670 = 0.083 ft m
x
= ap x = 6x = 6(0.083) = 0.498 ft (par. 6-26) e e

=
T = n
d.
6.28^4.22/3670
-
= 0.213 sec
Work Done vs Energy Absorption Capacity. T/Tn = 0.062/0.213 = 0.291 = R /B = 304/562 = 0.54 C m R
First Trial
= 1.35(0.062) = 0.084 sec t^/T = 1.35 (fig- 5-29), tm m The original load-time curve should "be revised to obtain a closer apThe impulse up to proximation to the total impulse up to time t m
.
=0.10
sec in figure 7*60 is H = 1.167 psi-sec (obtained by graphical
integration).
T = 2H/B = 2(l.l67)/25.3 = 0.0923 sec T/Tn = 0.0923/0.213 = 0.437

= 1.2(0.0923) = 0.111 sec t /T = 1.2 (fig. 5-29), t m m
Try again for impulse up to t = 0.12 sec
H = 1.214 psi-sec, T = 2(l.2l4)/253 = 0.0^ sec, T/T, n

= 0.096/0.213 = 0.45
= 1.2(0.096) = 0.115 sec; OK t /T = 1.2 (fig. 5-29), t m m
C
y
p
= 0.71 (fig-
5-27)
=
(562)(0.096)
V
2
C W = W P
-
8(4.22)
ox- c = 86 5 f
W = m
71(86.5) = 61.5 ft-kips

-
E = R (x m m
Since E
e.
0-5x e ) = 304 [0.498
0.5(0.083)]
a
= 139 ft-kips
W a new trial should be made m Second Trial - Actual Properties. Since E
the interis ob
mediate value of energy for use in determining the second trial R
tained as follows:
_
0.5(61.5+139.0)
0.498
_ 201 kips
""
m
Required
R h
kip-ft
172
1-tet
EM 1110-345-417
15 Jan 58
Use same column constants as above and substitute into equation (4-32)
436(12) = 0.0l5(l2)t(52)(t
9.35t 2 42t
-f
4.5)
-t-
284 fo.5t
L
,
-
1*
J^>. (V^yJ*;
l42t
1015
524o *
t = 21 in., try b * 12 In., t
20 in.
^D
n
- 4.5) 284 ~ 0.015(12)20(52)(2Q +
12
"15
1.7(12)3^
= 242
4-
152 = 39^ kip-ft
a /a = 2.25/(20 - 2.25) = 0.127 For P = P = 0.015 and n = 10

1
m
q k
= np + (n
= np + (n
l)p
= 0.15 + 9(0.015) = 0.285
l)p d"/cl = 0.15-4- 9(0.015)0.127 = 0.167
= 0.36 (table 11 RCDH of ACl)
+
2
+ np(l
= 12(17. 75 )
+ 9(0-015) {(0.36)
-H
2(0.36X0.127) +
(0.127)
I
0.15(1
0.36)
i
I I
= 67,200(0.0845) = 5680-in. = bt 3 /12 = (20 3 ) = 8000 in.

1
= 0.5(1^ + I.) = 6840 in.

3
_ 12(3)10 (6840)3 _
k ps/f t
H^'^-"
X x
T
f.
=
=
= 6x
=
= 6(0.114) = 0.684 ft (par. 6-26)
= 0-322 sec 6.28-^/4.22/1590 Second Trial - Work Done vs Energy Absorption Capacity.
= 0.096/0.322 = 0.298
T/T
C
= R /B = 182/562 = 0.324 m
t /T = 1.8 (fig. 5-29), t m = 1.8(0.096) = 0.173 sec m

173
EM 1110-3^5-^17
15 Jan 58
7-43
exceeds the value of t = 0.12 sec for which the value The idealized load-time curve should be revised of T = 0,096 was obtained*
The value of t
to approximate more closely the total impulse up to t
The total impulse
up to t = 0.20 sec (fig. 7-6o) is H = 1.37^ psi-sec (obtained by graphical

integration)*
T = 2H/B = 2(l.37^}/25.3 = 0.109 sec
T/T
= 0, 109/0, 322 = 0.338
= 1-75 (fig- 5-29), t = 1.75(0,109) = 0.191 secj OK m

= 0.83 (fig.
5*27)
2
_ (562
STTT-T^T^
u
P
"
2m
" (BT/2)
2m
f (0.109)
ft -kips
= 0.83(111.0) = 92.1 ft -kips
= 182
[0.6811-
ft-kips
is slightly greater than
and another
trial might be made.
It is desirable, however ^
to be conservative in the preliminary design because simplifying assumptions are used (par.
7-VO-
Therefore the 12 by 20 column is selected
as the preliminary design and an actual column
section is selected to establish the column

plastic bending moment for use in the girder design that follows in
paragraph 7-^3
d" = 2. Ml- in., d =
1756
in., d
= 15-12 in.,
#9
"bars,
= 197 + 237
8^5
= 350 kip-ft
7.11.3
DESIGN OF ROOF GIRDER
The frame of this building consists of three
forms a tee beam rectangular columns supporting a rectangular girder which The roof girder is designed to resist the combined with the roof slab.
vertical loads on the roof and the lateral loads on the frame as explained
7-^3a
I
EM 1110-3^5-^17
15 Jan 58
Since this manual provides a technique for handling only single-span elements, the continuous girder is designed to withstand
in paragraph 7-11-
vertical loads as a beam fixed at the interior support and pinned at the exterior support.
Although the other structural elements of this building are permitted to deflect plastically, the girder should be designed to behave elastically
so that proper restraint is maintained for the column throughout the de-
flection 'history of the frame
The design bending moment of
the girder is the sum of the moments

at
*tlae
fixed support due to (l) the
gj
roof slab dynamic reactions, (2) the static loads, and (3) the frame acbion.
20'- 0"
20' -0"
The moment due to frame ac-
tion in a two-bay frame is equal to me -half the column plastic moment

pa:r.
20,0'
7-ll)
The girder is designed as a tee beam in the region of positive mo-
îrb
3
In the region of negative moment near the interior support the girder
section,,
of rectangular
This results in a girder of variable moment of

,
lertia for which there are special expressions for R -21a and table 6A).
aas*b
and
k.
(par.
Loading*
The critical frame girder loading results from the

Since the girder is parallel
vave traveling parallel to the girder.
th.e
short side of the building the appropriate roof loading is from the
ne 3 condition- For Zone 3 loading the time variation of the local roof sr pressure varies continuously from front to back of the building.
To obtain the true variation
of slab dynamic reaction on the girder
ild Toe a tedious task as well as unjustified in the light of all the posIn this example a conservative loading based on the ,le inaccuracies.
ident overpressure
d in
sla,~b
curve (fig. 7-57) is used as the basis for the slab determining the girder load. This is warranted because in general reaches its maximum displacement before the vortex action in
lias
an opportunity to reduce the incident overpressure to the local

175
EM 1110 -3^5 15 Jan 58
o-lo
.,
SUOJ40D9H
QD|S
176
pUD |D001
EM 1110-345.417
15 Jan 58
roof overpressure (see pars* 7-23 and 7-25 and table 7,5). The girder load is determined from the slab dynamic reactions for incident overpressure with the blast wave traveling parallel to the girder. Plotting from table 7 25 the same variation of dynamic reaction at the
front and rear ends of the girder and averaging

the total load on the girder gives the variation
of average girder load from one slab in figure
24. 4 kips/ft
The preliminary design load is obtained by idealizing the load-time curve in figure 7.65 and
7.65.
multiplying by two to account for the two slabs

loading the girder
.
Tr
0.032 sec
The idealized load is
Time (sec)
B = 12.2(2) = T
b.
2^ 4
kips/ft
= 0.032 sec
K = 0.58, L
k = f
3
El.,/!,
^
(fig. 6.29)
OA5,
IM
= f M
l Ps/
L (fig
= f M M 2 n pos
[
=
l
R-jI/f^ (fig. 6,27)

4-
= 0.26R
0.12P
2
c.
= 0-43R
4-
0*19P
Mass Computation.
roof
.
7 7
-
Hg~[
.
15
6.0]
- ta.O kips
\ / 18(36 )20(] 50) no (estimate; = / 1 Q\ 10 /-innr>\ = -^S-P

.
Total mass =
d.
"^22
-
lft
^^ kip- sec /ft
First Trial
Actual Properties*
Estimate tee beam action for -first trial, f lu -'rV^ f__ o J-o "" n f\i f o ~ piio
J7j?
^'
<
J-
Assume D.L.F. = 1.5 (experience) = 732 kips Rm = D.L.F. (B) =

177
EM 1110-345-417
15 Jan 58
in girder at interior support (fixed support) due to static
136 kip-ft Moment in girder at midspan due to static load M = 9WL/128 = 9(54.5)20/128 = 77 kip-ft Moment from column
loads
M = WI/8 = (41.0 + 13.5)20/8 =
= 0.5(350) = 175 kip-ft (par. 7 -42f 0.5Mp ) Moment resistance required for vertical blast loads M = R L/9 = 732(20 = 1630 kip.-ft )/9 m The total moment resistance required
M =
1630 + 175 + 136 = 1941 kip-ft

(eq
Assume p = 0.015
.
Oj = 23,300 kip-in. If b = 20 in.,, d = 41.2 in.; try h = 4 5 in., d = 4l. 5 in From figure 6.28 estimate f = 0.6 7 (from g experience)
[l
Midspan moment = 0.67(1630) = 1090 + 77 = 1167 kip-ft
+0+77
6N,9 M...|...J_Li
'
Ratio of midspan tension reinforcement to interior support tension reinforcement is 1167 = 0.60. 19UI
..
Effective Section at Interior Support
Rectangular section at fixed

3"
np = 10(i2)/20(4i.5) = 0.1445 np' = 10(6)/20(4l.5) = 0.0722 I = 20(45 ) 3 /12 = 152,000 g m = np + ( n - l)p'

= 0.1445 +
^Q-
(0.0722) = 0.2095
1 = np +
Effective Section ot Midspon
l)p'
11
= 0.1445 + 2(0.0722)
%& = 0.14S
178
EM 1110-345-417
15 Jan 58
= 0.38 (table 11 RCDH of ACl)
kd = 0.38(41.5; = 15.7
l
t
2 = 20(15. 7) 3 /3 + 9(6)(13.45) 2 + 12.0(io)(25.8) 1 = 19,35P + 9750 + 80,000 = 109,000 in.
*"
3^
= (I
11 + I )0.5 = 130,000 in. t
Tee section at midspan
np
= 10(7)/82(42.75) = 0.0200
1
np
= 10(4)/82(42.75)
=0.0114
_ -
2 2 [-82(7.75) ]/2 + [20(37. 25) ]/2 _ 11,640 _ = 8.^5 in e 82(7.75) + 20(37-25) 1380
,^) M!,!5L +
33
3
-
20(37. 25 )
3
_
2
1380(8 . 45)
m
q.
= 12,700 + 345,000 - 98,500 = 250,200 in. = np + (n - l)p' = 0.0200 + 0.9(0.0114) = 0.0303
= np + (n
l)p'
^-
= 0.0200 + 0.9(O.01l4)
.75
= 0.0205
in.
k = 0.18 (table 11 RCDH of ACl), kd = (O.l8)(42.75) =7.7

9 (4)(7.7
-
2.25 )
10(7)(42.75
= 12,500 + 1070 + 86,000 = 99,570 in.
I
f~
= 0.5(1
&
+ I
t b
= 179,400
in>
I /I
= 130,000/179,^00 = 0.725
r^
f
= 8.85 (fig. 6.27)
= 0.66 (fig. 6.28) fo = 235 (fig- 6.29)
_ 53s11 = 235_(3llQ (l3Q.QQQ) =

L3
(20)
3
l^
\
kips/ft
At the interior support

8
,2
ivffi-j (P^
/
1 -
(ect
^.16)
= 0.01445 (52)20(41. 5 )
0.01445(52)1
-ft
179
EM 1110-345-iHT 15 Jan 58
7.
sec
T /T = 0.032/0.0256 = 1.25 r n
D.L.F. = 1.18
= 1-3
t
ffi
1.3(0.032) = O.C&17 sec
The idealized loading is a satisfactory approximation for the loading

in figure 7-65.
Required R = 1.18(24.4)20 = 575 kips

The available resisting moment at the interior support for vertical
blast loads is
M = 1910
136
197 = 1577 kip-ft
The available resistance is

R-,
JJ21
= f.M- /L = 8.9(1577)/20 = 700 kip-ft JL JrS
The available R.
is greater than the required R
Another trial
will be made by reducing the amount of reinforcing steel.
Reducing the
steel required by the ratio of the resistance calculated above

2 Use 10 #9 tension bars; A = (575/700)(l2) = 9-85 in. s
p = (10)/20(1H.5) = 0.01205 2 M = 0.01205(52)20(lH.5) [-, 12 Mp |_i
0.01205(52)1 _ -
LYO^)
,. g , f ">3I> kip-rt
J
-
e available resistAssuming no substantial change in I-iIp and T = 8.9(1635 - 197 - 136)/20 = 580 kips ance is R 575 kips
e.
Second Trial
Actual Properties.
Rectangular section at fixed support

np = 10(lO)/20(4l.5) = 0.1205 np = 10(6)/20(4l.5) = 0.0702
l
= 152,000 in.
(n - l)p'
-
m = np +
q.
= 0.1205 +
(0.0702) = 0.18U
= np + (n
l)p'
= 0.1205 +
(0.0?02)
|jy|
k = 0.35 (table 11 RCDH of ACl) kd = 0.35(Ul.5) = 14.5 in.

180
7-43f
EM 1110-345.417
15 Jan 58
^-
+ 9(6)(12.25)
10(10)(27.0)
I-L
= 20,300 + 8100 + 4 73,000 = 101,400 in. = 0.5(l + I = 126,000 in. 4 t) g
section at midspan
The tension steel at midspan = 0.6(10) = 6 bars (par. 7-4 3 d) = 10(6) /82 (42. 7 5) = np 0.0171
np
= 10(3)/82 (42.75) = 0.00855 = np + (n - l)p- = 0.0171 +

1
0.9(0.00855) = 0.0248
q = np + (n
l)p' *1 = 0.0171 + 0. 9 (0.008 5 5)
k = 0.165 (table 11 RCDH of ACl) kd = 0.165(42.75) = 7.06 in.

4 I = 81,300 in. , I = 259,200 in. 4 I = t , (T g & = 126, 700/170, 200 = 0.74
f^
+
= 0.0175
1^0.5
= i 70 , 2 00 in. 4
I-L/Ig
f
f
2 f_ = 232 (fig. 6.29)
= 8.8 (fig. 6.27) = 0.655 (fig. 6.28)
^f^
m
<>**
T /T = r n
Oo
032/0o0257 =1.25
DoLoF
f.
= 1.18 (fig. 5.21)

= 1. l8(24 e ^)(20) = 575 kips
Required R.^

max
= 0*62R
= 0.62(575) = 356 kips
= 0.15(3000) = k$Q psi (par- ^-09)
Estimated V
Allowable u = 0.15^
rn ^ -
JL
ujd
. 8(356,000) ^ "
450(7>l-5
As =
>:o
10 #9 bars in two rovs, A = 10 ins

=
= 35.^ in., p = A /bd s
go
gj
= 0.01205
1.81
EM 1110-345-417 15 Jan 58
Determination of Maximum Deflection and Dynamic Reactions, by Numerical Integration. Since the trial size may be used directly without
g
modification reference is made to the previous computations for pertinent

data.
=15^6 kips
Rim
ye k,
=
'570
0.0072ft
79,OOO kips/ft
Total mass =
==1
32,2^*
2 76 kip-sec /ft
WL Static load girder moment = -TT-Maximum Deflection
Deflection,
y (ft)
Maximum girder resistance in elastic

range R. = 1m
= 570 kips
-
Figure 7.66.
Resistance
function for girder
spanning 20
ft
R,
570 = 0.0072 ft , ooo
The basic equation for the numerical integration in table 7.2O is
where
-R
)(6.2 5 )(10-
(10"
)(Pn
elastic n ) ft,
range
sec (par. 5-08).
The
values for the second column are obtained from figure
55^
multiplying
by 2 x 20 to account for the 20-ft span and the two slabs loading the
girder.
The maximum deflection computed in table 7.26 is (y
)
= 0.0069
ft.
This is less than, but close to, the specified maximum ^flection, y = 0.0072 ft. The design is satisfactory.
e
182
7-43h
EM 1110-345-417
15 Jan 58
7.26.
Table
lu
Shear and Bond Strength,

(fixed end of idealized girder
)
For interior support end of girder

V
= 328 kips (table 1.26}
For no shear reinforcement^ allowable v = O.cA-f^ 4- 5000p v = O.OM3000) + 5000(0,01205) = 120 + 6l = 181 psi
y
(eq.
_ -
7B3
8V _ 8(328 OOP) _ " k5 7(20)41.5
Sheeir reinforcement required for 452 - l8l = 271 psi

183
EM 1110-345-^17 15 Jan 58
r =
4-U,UUU
7 ,
'
'
s
\
= 0.80 in.
= 0.00677^
*.
59
in., use s = 6 in.
For exterior support end of girder (pinned end of idealized girder) = 201 kips (table 7-26)
v v =
= 0.04(3000) + 5000(0.00171) = 120 + 9 = 129 psi 8V Tbd

-
129 = 139
Try
r =
k-
#k,
=
= 0.80 in.
=
20(s)
'37j
'
s = 11.5 in.,
use
= 11 in.
Bond
~ ~ u __!__
8(201,000)
7Sod
7(21.3>2.75
'
_ ?Sp __, ~ p psl
Allowable u = 0.15f = 0.15(3000) = ^50 psi; OK C

i.
Summary.
Girder 20- in. X ^5-in. tee beam

7-W-
FI3ML DESIGN OF CQIUMEL

7-^-2.
This column design for plastic behavior was
begun in paragraph
The calculations which follow illustrate the
steps which are needed to determine the adequacy of the preliminary design.
The primary objective is the calculation of the lateral displacement of the
top of the column as a function of time by a numerical integration.

In the preliminary design of the column some of the factors which
affect the maximum deflection of the column are neglected to simplify the
computations.
These factors which are now considered are:
the variation
of plastic hinge moment with direct stress, the variation of column re-
sistance with lateral deflect ion, the effect of girder flexibility on the
stiffness of the frame, the difference between the load on the wall slab,
and the dynamic reactions from the wall which are used as the lateral design
load for the frame columns.
EM 1110-345-417 15 Jan 58
Reference should be made to the preliminary design in paragraph 7-42. a. Mass Computation.
Roof slab = 82.0 kips (par. 7-42b)

Girder stem
-
3^.25(2Q)(4l.67)l50 = 2 Q ^ kipg
- 9-75
Walls = 7^-8 kips (par, 7~42b)
Mass of single-degree-of -freedom system = total roof +
i
.3
82.0 + 2 9 .8 + 0,33(9-75 4-74.8) (columns + walls) = j2

<
=4.35 kip-sec /ft

b.
Column Properties.
(See par. 7-42h.

in.
b = 12 in., t = 20 in., d = 17.56

d'
= 15-12 in., d" = 2.44 in., A
'
= 3 in. 2 , p = 0.0142
= A f, d
s
dy
0.5t
(eq.
4.32)
3(52)(15.12)
12
1.7(12 )3.
2
Mp
c.
= 196-6 + o.83P D
o.ooi05PD Effect of Girder Flexibility.
Consideration of the relative

elastic
flexibility of the girders generally results in a value of the frame
spring constant k which is less than the value obtained for infinitely stiff girders in the preliminary design (par, 7-08). To obtain this re-
vised value
a simple sides-way analysis of the frame is made.

k
From the
sides-way analysis
is the magnitude of the lateral load required to
cause unit displacement.

The elastic sidesway analysis (the results of which are shown in
figure 7-67) is performed for initial column moments of -1000 kip-ft at top and "bottom of each column. This is equivalent to a lateral displacement of
the top of the column.
2
= (F.E.M. )h
2 i44 = iooo(i4.63) =
IT:
6(3)10 (6890)
185
EH U10-345-1H7 15 Jan 58
400
kips
From figure 7,67

-
gM_g950 + 975
J-f-00
+1000)
=
-
470
kips
-975
= 1600 kips/ft
In this example the girders
Figure 7.67.
Sidesway analysis by
distribution
are relatively stiff and there

is no significant reduction in
moment
spring constants (par* 7-^-2e).
column of the numerical integration analysis The first part of figure 7.68 (table 7.27) is obtained from figure 7,68.
^*
loading*
The F
Table 7.27.
Determination of Column Adequacy
186
EM 1110-3^5-^17
15 Jan 58
pooi ubisaa
187
EM
15 Jan 58
is "based on
7.23).
dynamic reaction column of the vail slab analysis (table The dynamic reactions for a one-foot width of vail are multiplied
V..
by
18, the width of one frame bay.
The portion of the curve after t = 0.0^5 sec is based on the net
lateral overpressure curve (fig. 76o).
Here the values of F
are obtained
from
. 1M(18)8.56 p ^ OP op " ^* 2 JH net 1000 net klps
The dimension 8^56 is equal to one-half the front where P is in psi. net vail clear span plus the roof slab thickness, 1/2 (15.82) + 0.65 = 8.56 ft.
,
e.
Numerical Integration Computation to Determine Column Adequacy.

is obtained -by multiplying the average roof
The total vertical load P
overpressure (fig. 7-6l) by

(1A.25)CL8)11A " 1000
^
and adding the dead weight of the roof system (112 kips).
The
(Pp.)
values
axe the average axial column loads and are obtained by dividing the total
vertical load by
3)
the number of columns.
The (P_)
column is used in the

.
formula of paragraph J-Wfb to obtain the value of (M_)

(M-.)
The value of
is used in turn to obtain the maximum resistance at any time
from the
relation
2(3)(M n )
is equal to kx
= l600x
in the elastic range.

is R
.
In the plastic
range the limiting value of 1*
The expression (P x )/h
indicates
the decrease in resistance corre spending to the increase in moment re-
sulting from the eccentric loading.
The basic equation for the numerical integration analysis in table

7.21 is
V
where
+ 1
\(At)2
+ 2x
'
188
^Hf
EM 1110-345-417 15 Jan 58
r, n L
-H
!| h
c J
P x~| n n
n
4.35
h
c
(0.01)'
The time interval At = 0.01 sec used in table 7-2? is less than one= 2it1 = tenth the natural period^ 6,28^4,35/1.600 = 0.327 sec. T^ Jni/k ^27 = 0.0327 (par, 5-08) in order to provide a more faithful At = 0.01 < ^Q representation of the load curve (fig. 7.68). The allowable maximum
displacement =
'
= 0,627 ft (par, 7-^2c and table 7.21).
The
computed maximum displacement = 0*44.

The design is satisfactory^
f.
Thus the design op = 6
\0.o27/
= 4.2.
Shear and Bond Stress.
kips (table max For ncr shear reinforcement

+ 5000p (eg 4,24) 0,04f^ = 0.04(3000) + 5000(0.0142) = 120 + 71 = 191 psi
Allowable v
v
v _
M
Tbd
1
"
8(55.700)
^
, , " J J
_. p
-
191 = 112 psi
Try
=0,20
-
in*
0028
r =
s =
5.95 in., use s = 6 in.
Eo = 8.9
u _
in.
8(55,700) _ 7(8.9)17-56 Allowable u = 0.15f
P
'
= 0.15(3000) = 450 psi
>
psi; OK
NUMERICAL EXAMPLE^ DESIGN OF A ONE-STORY REIEFORCED-CONCRETF, FRAME BUILDING- -ELASTIC AMD EIASTO-PIASTIC BEHAVIOR
7-^5
GEKERAL.
of a vindowless,
This numerical example presents the design of a typical reinforced-concrete rigid-frame building in onestory,
Tsay
189
EM 1110-3^5-^4-17 15 Jan 58
54'-0"
which the primary elements are
permitted to deflect elastically and the others to deflect

into the elasto -plastic region.
The example includes the design

I I
f
I6'-0"
I6'-0" Cross Section
I6'-0"
of a typical wall slab, roof

slab, girder, and column.
"o
iS'-P"
108
The building consists of
reinforced-concrete rigid
frames and reinforced-concrete
wall and roof slabs.
The wall
slab is a one-way slab span-
ning vertically, supported at

the bottom by the wall footing
Plan
which is integral with the

foundation, and at the top by
Figure 7.69.
Plan and section of building
the roof slab.
The roof slab
is also a one-way slab spanning continuously over the reinforced-concrete
frames.
The roof girders are tee beams formed by the roof slab and a recThe columns are rectangular tied columns symmetri-
tangular girder stem*
cally reinforced in the strong direction.

7~W>
DESIGN PROCEDURE,
The over-all design procedure illustrated by this
example is essentially the same as the procedure detailed in paragraph 7-29

for the elastic design of a steel rigid-frame building with reinforced con-
crete walls and roof.

7-^7
LOAD DETERMINATION*
The computation of loads is explained in
EM 1110-3^-5-^13 and illustrated again in paragraph 7-19 for a one-story

building.
In this example the necessary load curves are presented without

The design overpressure of 10 psi is selected
explanation or computation.
arbitrarily for this example.

(1) Incident overpressure vs time (fig. 7-70) (2) Front face overpressure vs time (fig. 77l) (3) Rear face overpressure vs time (fig. 7*72) GO Net lateral overpressure vs time (fig. 7.73) (5) Average roof overpressure vs time (fig.
190
EM 1110-345-417 15 Jan 58
00
s
CO
(isd)
191
EM 1110-345-417
15
Jan 58
=
25.3
Initial
Idealized Load
Time Curve
'O
T = 0.06I
0,1
0,2
0,3
(sec)
Time,t
Figure 7.71
Front face overpressure vs time curve
192
7-^7
EM 1110-3^5-^17 15 Jan 58
,_
193
EM 1110-3^5-^17
15 Jan 58
25,3 psi
Initial
Idealized
Load-Time Curve
0/0,
T=0,06!
Figure 7.73.
0,2
0,3
t
Time,
Net
(sec)
lateral overpressure vs time curve
7-4?
EM 1110-345-41? 15 Jan 58
CU
SP
EM 1110-3^5-^17 15 Jan 58
7-48
T-W DESIGN
OF WALL SLAB.
The wall slab is designed by considering an
element one foot wide, spanning vertically between a fixed support at the
foundation and a pinned support at the roof slab.
The wall slab is de-
signed to deflect through the elasto-plastic range up to the beginning of the plastic range. This means that the
design load is expected to cause development of plastic hinges first at the fixed
support and then near midspan.
14,75'
This is an example of a design for
which the elasto-plastic design procedure

is used.
Another method of design which
could be used utilizes the elastic design

procedure and an artificial maximum resistance (par. 6-lê).
The design span length is equal to the clear distance between the
foundation and the roof slab.
The dead load stresses are not considered in
a vertical wall.
a.
Design Loading.

is defined by:
pc
loading shown by figure

B=53.8kips
??!
B = 25.3 T = 0.061 sec
o/iKliNlL. ^3
7^: ?5 = 53-8 kips
0.061 sec
T.
M=
Time
(sec)
(53.8^0.061
b.
Elastic range:
KL = 0.58,
8M
R,
KIM
Ps
V I = 0.26R
4-
0.12P,
= 0.1+3R + 0.19P
1C.
= 0.6^,
= 0.50,
KIM
'
78
196
480
EM 1110-345-41?
15 Jan 58
V
istic
O.39R + 0.11P
range:
KIM
srage
66
values:
+ 0.64) = 0.61
KL = 0.5(0.58
0.5(0.45 + 0.50) = 0.4?
Rm -
X
L
(plastic design, Mp s
-
First Trial
Actual Properties*
Assiome
Ass-ume
p = 0.015 at midspan cross section (par. ^CL = 1.7 (experience) n

1\
R
111
= CJB
= 1.7(53-8) = 91-5 kips
in inches)
.
li
>;
>
Try
= 14 in., d = 12.5 in., p = 0.015, np = 0.15
=
Rm
I
0. 688(12. 5) 2 = 107-5 kip-ft

. , 87 . 5 kips
14. fy
3 = 3 TDh /12 = (14.0) 2740 in.
+ np(l
kf
)
= 12(d) 3
= 0.905d3 = 0.905(12. 5 3 = 1770 in. = 0.5(1 + L.) = 0.5(2740 + 1770) =

g
"c
2255 in.
160EI _ (160)3(10) 2255 = 231,0 kips/ft 3 144 L3 (14.75)

197
EM 1110-345-417
15 Jan 58
7-48d
. 2 58 kips
.
Mass m =
|^| j^.î
Ê
= 0.08 kip-sec /ft
=
l
lf
= 1 - 1 55(23^0) = 2700 kips/ft
-Q],
=
5fl5o"7
ep
2 3^0) = 1120 kips/ft
8M
=
p
~T
8(107.5) = en , .. 58 3 klps 15775

'
d.
First Trial
=
me
Vm
6l ( 8 7-5) = 53.^ kips (eq 6.12)

(eq.
He = KJH = 0.61(1.64) = 1.0 kip-sec

m
6.8)
(eq 6.2)
= Kjn = 0,^-7(0.08) = 0.0376 kip-sec /ft
KTn
,,
= 0.0321+ sec
(H
2
)
/,
P
e.
-2-
'
2(00376)
First Trial-Work Done vs Energy Absorption Capacity.
= T/T = 0.06 1/0 .0324 = 1.88 n C p = R/B = 87.5/53-8 = 1.63 (eqs 6.15, 6.l6) 331 I\
C
t /T m
=0.26
(fig.
5.29)
t = (0.26)0.061 = 0.016 sec ' v m Idealized load -time curve is satisfactory (fig. 7-7l)(par. 5-13)
C
= 0.091 (fig. 5-27)

C
W = m
W = 0.091(13.3) = 1.21 ft-kips w p

198
(eq.
6.17)
EM 1110^345-417
15 Jan 58
E = R
me (ym
o.5y e ) = 53
[0.0^76
0.5(0.0216)]
= 1.96 ft-kips (eq.6.18)

"
W,
therefore the selected proportions are satisfactory as a
preliminary design.
f.
Second Trial
+ E) *;
Actual Properties.
__
0.5(1.96 + 1.2)
(0.61) [0.0476
2
i
0.5y e
)~"
" T
klps
0.5(0.0216)]
d - 11 2 in a = J-.^ in.
12M
,
P . (I2)0.688d
U-.75
u O>
..
Try h = 12.5 in., d = 11.0 in., p = 0.015 2 2 M^ = 0.688d = 0.688(ll) = 83.3 kip-ft
I I
= 0.905d 3 = 0. 905(11. 0) 3 = 1210 in. a

= 0.5(1
(k =
+ I
= 0.5(1950 + 1210) = 1580

3
I61f0
in>
^PEI
L R
3
= (160)3(10) 1580 =
k ps/ ft
68
u >,+ Weight =
Mass
k
=
-. - (12)1000
ft
o' o 2 3
m =
"
~| = 0.0715
3<d.
kip-sec /ft
= 1 - 1 55(i6^0) = 1890 kips/ft = 0.1*8(161+0) = 788 kips/ft
' ep
k.,
5(160)
i!i
**--*&&
*-
**
3B55
0238 ft
199
EM
15 Jan 58
1m
p = n 0238 +
'
68-45.0 -
= 0.053 ft
ep
g.
Second Trial
= KT R
JL
me
=
e
= 0.61(68) = la. 5 kips (eg. 6.12) m

= 0.61(1.610 = 1.0 kip-sec (eq. 6.8)
Kj-H
K^m
2 = 0.47(0.0715) = 0.0336 kip-sec /ft (eq 6.2)
sec
2(0.0336)
= 14.9 ft-kips
(eq.
6.10)

= T/T = 0.06l/0.0366 = 1.67 n
C
t
= R /B = 68/53.8 = 1.26 (eqs 6.15, 6.l6) m
m/T
= 0.34 (fig. 5.29)
= (0.34)0.061 = 0.0207 sec
Idealized load-time curve is satisfactory (fig. 7-71)
w W = m
= 0.118 (fig. 5-27)

C
W = W P
ll8 ( ll|--9) = 1 -76 ft-kips (eq 6.17)

'
E = R
" 5y e ) = 4l 5 t-53 - 0.5(0.0238)] = l.?l ft-kips (eq 6.18} me (ym E ^W, therefore the selected proportions are not satisfactory as a pre'
liminary design.
i-

)
At bottom of wall (at fixed end of idealized slab

This section has smaller
than at midspan therefore p > 0.015= 83.3 kip-ft, required p0.0l8t|-.
From equation
*J-.l6
for d = 10 in. and M
Outside Face
Estimated V
Outside Foce
No. 8
max
= 1/2 R m
2"Cover
2.5"
No. 8;
= 1/2 (68) = 3^ kips
10"
Allowable u = O.ljf^
= 0.15(3000)
Section ot
Bose
Section at Midheight
psi (par. t200
7-48,3
EM 1110-345-417 15 Jan 58
_
JL
8(3MOO)
450(7)10
in.,
=
-
_ -
Ery#8 at 4-1/4
Ag
2 = 2.23 in. /ft,
o =
8.9 in./ft
0186
)
At
top of vail (at pinned end of idealized slab
Estimated V
Pn _ ~
= 1/3
c ? ^
,
= 1/3 (68) = 23 kips

n
>J
8(23,000) _ ~ 450(7)11.25
Bond stress is not critical

Try #8 at 4-1/4 in., A a = 2.23 in. S
S 2.23 = n rn<c 165 P = bd = 11.25(12)
-
2
,
Zo = 8.9 in.
3-
Determination of Maximum Deflection and Dynamic Reactions
"by
Numerical Integration,
"m
'
'Vd
^
(eq.
'
= 9^.5 kip-ft
^.l6)
E~i
L
:;ffi^2) f\3*x/
-*-
= 82<6 kip _ ft
1 3 = bh3 /12 = (12. 5 ) = 1950 in.
*"
+ np(l
k)
2J
12(11 .25)
[^
+ 0.148(1 - 0.42)
= 1290 in.^
I
= 0.5(1
+ I+ ^
= 0.5(1950 + 1290) = 1620 in.
- 2.3
Mass
-=4 ^-*^-
2 = 0.0715 kip-sec /ft
Elastic range:
B n*-
= 185EI =
kips/ft
201
EM 1110-3^5-^17 15 Jan 58
*ep
- 0-058 ft
ep
"Effective Resistance"
Rrr
By providing equal areas under the "effective resistance" line and the computed elasto-
k,
=!940kips/ft I7l0kips/ft
plastic resistance line, y_ = 0.0^3 ft (fig. 7-75) &

T-
806
*| ye
= =
-'
kips/ft
= 1710 kips/ft
j=*
yE
IIS
yep
0,023 ft 0.043 ft 0.058 ft
Deflection, y
(ft)
JE
Figure 7.75.
Resistance func/or Z2-Z/2-/71. s/a6 span 14.75 ft, fixed at one

support, pinned at
-358
t>
sec
as i c equation for the numerical in/
2y
\2 tegration in table 7-28 is yn + 1 = Yn (At) + (table 5-3) vhere

-
(P.
B )(At) n
(P
R )(0.003)
78 (0.0715)
"
<
>
elastlc
(P
R )(0.003)
78(0. 0715
"K
<
o.
(P
R )(0.003) 2
The time interval At = 0.003 sec is less than T /10 = 0.00358 sec (par. 5-08).
The dynamic reaction equations are listed in paragraph 7- i4-8b.
The ? values n
for the second column are obtained from figure 7-71, multiplying by
llA(ll|..75)/1000 = 2.12.
202
7-48k
m 1110-345-417
15 Jan 58
Table
7.28.
= 0.060 ft. the maximum computed deflection is (y ) n = 0.05^f Biis Is slightly more than the specified maximum displacement, y
In table
728
ft.
This is an acceptable difference for blast resistant design.

k.
Shear Stress and Bond Strength.

-wall (fixed end of idealized beam)
For bottom of
xoax
32.5 kips (table 7.28)

+ 500op = 0.0^(3000) + 5000(0.0186) = 120 + 93
(eq.
If.
= o.okf
'
= 213 psi
as
Tbd
7(12)(10J
-
213 = 97 psi
1 #4,
A =
20
'.
0.20 in.
bs
, ,
8-1/2
= 0..00242;
.'.
s = 9-75 in., use
s = 9
203
EM
15 Jan 58
7-481
For top of vail (pinned end of idealized "beam)
V
v
max
=
= 32.'5 kips (table 7-28)

\
+ 5000p = 0.0^(3000) + 5000(0.0114-8) = 120 + 7 * =

1
19^-
psi
8V
8(32.500)
_ ""
-25)
/Corner Dowels
psl
^
Shear reinforcement required for
275 r =
-
Constr, Jt,
19^ - 81 psi
+0,
81 = 0.00202 000
= 0.20
in.'
Try 1
Â
r =
IDS
0.20 = 0.00202; 8-1/2 s

s
s
4'
= 11.65 in., use
= 11 in.
-9"
Bond
" u _
8V _ 8(32,500) _ " " 7(8.9)10 72od

=
PS1
Allomble u
= ^50 psi
2" Cover Outside
= 0.15(3000)
> k!2 psi; OK
1.
Summary.
slab
Foundation Steel Not Shown
Slab Steel Not Shown
12- 1/2- in.
7-49
DESIGN OF ROOF SIAB.
The design procedure folloved in designing this
roof slab is similar to the design procedure for design of the wall slab in
paragraph 7-^8
Consideration is given to the static load stresses in this

Since the
case because they reduce the maximum resistance of the slab.
procedures of this manual are

limited to single-span elements,
the slab is designed by considering
le'-o"
the behavior of a one-foot-wide
element fixed at both ends and
spanning 18 ft between the frame

center lines.
The slab is permitted
L
18,0
to deflect through the elasto-plastic
7-4-9a
EM 1110-345-417 15 Jan 58
range but not into the plastic range (fig. 7.76, page 208). a * Design Loading. Since the maximum deflection of this slab is limited to the elasto-plastic region, this maximum deflection occurs in a
very short time (table 7-29, page 208). The rapid response means that the design load for all slab elements may be based on the incident overpressure
regardless of the direction of motion of the blast wave. Only on the first few feet from the front edge, for the blast wave moving perpendicular to
the long axis of the building, is the loading reduced by the vortex action "before the slab reaches its maximum deflection (par. 3-08d).
The design load as idealized from the computed loading shown by figure 7-70 is defined by:
10
B
=
25.9 kips
= 25.9
1*0.38 sec
T = 0.38 sec
~b
Time
(sec)

= 0.53,
"
=
Elastic range:
K^
I^
'
OA1,
K^
= 0.77
*lm
""T~
" 384EI
V =
0.'
Elastic -plastic range:
KL
= 0.6^,
Rm -
V =
Average values:
K^
jr
= 0.5(0.53 + 0.6U) - 0.58
0.5(0.^1 + 0.50) = OA55

= 0.5(0.77 + 0.78) = 0.77
D
inf
.-
22Mp 2 (fictitious L
maxinrum resistance)
205
EM 1110-345-417 15 Jan 58
7" kQ T 49c
\
c.
264EI
IT-
"elastic" effective spring constant

-
L
First Ofrial
Actual Properties.
Assume D.L.F.
-
=2.0 (experience)
= D L - F -(B) = 2.0(25-9) = 51-8 R kips (par. 6-11) mf

Ass-ume p = 0.015
0.015 (52)(l)d
2
[l
^ffi
g 51 '>
]]
= 0.688d2 kip-ft (d d = 7-85 in.
in incnes;
mf
HT^
2 _ (22)0.688d
lB IB
"
Try h = 9-1/2 in., d = 8-1/4 in., p = 0.015, np =0.15 2 = 0.688d2 = 0.688(8. 25 ) =46.9 klp-ft Mp
g
I
= bh3/12 = (9.5) 3 = 857 in. 4 - bd3

'=
[^
g
+ np(l
k)
2]
. 12(d) 3
[j^! +
0.15(1
2
0.42)
0.905d3 = 0.905(8.25)3 = 508 in. 4

+ I ) = 0.5(857 + 508) = 682 in. 4 t
= 0.5(l
* ^^,(264)3(103)682^ L3 I8 3
(i44)
Mass
<i.
m =
^|
= 0.07 kip-sec 2/ft
First Trial -Equivalent Properties.
= T = n 6.28^0.77(0.07)/644= 0.0576 sec an^Kj^n/kg

e-
First Trial
= T/T
-
= 38/0. 0576 =6.6 T n D.L.F. =1.92 (fig. 5.20)

C t /T m
=0.08
(fig.
5.20)
206
7-49f
EM 1110-345-417
15 Jan 58 t
ffl
0.08(0.38) = 0.0304 sec
Required
are
R^
= D.L.P.(B) = 1.92(25.9) = 49.8 kips < 57-3 kips
The required
< available R__ , therefore the selected proportions

Design
satisfactory as a preliminary design. f * preliminary for Bond Stress.
At
= 0.0304, P =
23.8 kips (fig. 7.70)
V =
+ 0.11P = 0.39(57.3) + 0.11(23.8) = 22.4 + 2.62=25-02 kips

'
Allowable u = 0.15f
= 0.15(3000) = 450 psi (par. 4-09)

.
Zo - -X- _ 8(25,020) 7 = 7>7 in ujd 450(7)(8.25) 2 Try #6 at 3-1/2 in., A = 1.51 in. , So = 8.1
'
in.,
h = 9.5 in.,
d = 8.37, P = bd
1.51 = 0.0151, 12(8.37)

cover
8,37"
9.5
np = 10(0.0151) = 0.151
g.
1.13""'
Determination of Maximum Deflection and Dynamic Eeactions by
= 49.0 kip-ft (eq 4.16)
= bh3 /12 = (9-5) 3 = 857 in.
V2
*t
'
_____
n p
+ 2np
np = C.^2
-
~ + np(l
"
2
k)
= C.9C5d 3 = C.9C5(6.37) 3 = 530 in.
1 a = 0.5(1 K + "a g
[
L) o
= 0.5(857 + 530) = 693 in.

13
^
l
Weight =
1000 =
2
=2.25 kips
m
Elastic range:
R lm =
weight =
^ffl
2.25 = 32.6
2.25 = 30-3 kips
207
EM
15 Jan 58
3 . 38M3)(10) 693 .
R
ê
"
1m _ 30. jjn ~ 950
= 0.0319 ft
.
2.25 = ^3-5
2.25 = ^1.2 kips
350 760 = k 90 ep
1
k.
ps/ft
30.3
kips/ft
kips /ft
ft
190
y tf
^
r
0.0319
XE
yep=
0.054 ft 0.089ft
= 0.0319 + 0.057 = 0.089 ft = 76o kips/ft
yp
Moximurn Deflection
(ft)
Def lection, y
Figure 7.76.
Resistance
function for 9-1/2-in. slab spanning 18 ft
6.28^0.77(0.07)7760
ttie
-
= 0.053 sec
The basic equation for
numerical integration in table 7.29 is
n
Table 7.29.
Determination of
Maximum Deflection and Dynamic Reactions
for
Roof Slab
208
n )(At)
2
E)(0.005)
0.78(0.07)
*'
i
The time interval At = 0.005 sec
Cpar. 5-08).
The dynamic reaction eguat
The P
IP lying
values for the second column are
by 144(18)/1000 = 2.59The maximum deflection (y

)
com
0,
"wiiich is less than the allowable y of m

h.
Shear Strength
and.
Bond Stress.
= 17-0 kips (table 7.29)

Allowable v
+ 5000p (eq 0.04f^ = 0.04(3000) + 5000(0.0151) = 120
=
4-
76 = 196 psi
v _
J*
Tbd
. -
8(17,000) _ 1Q , ~ 193 psl ^ OK 7(12) (8. 37)

.
No shear reinforcement required
u =
8V _ 8(17,000) _ _ - T/A i \& ^n 7Sod 7(8.1)8.37

""
8 î
Allowable
i.
u =
_
0.15^
= 0.15(3000) = 450 psi;
OK
Summary
9-1/2-in. slab
p = 0.0151
Zo = 8.1
in.
No shear reinforcement required
y_50 PEIEIJKINARY DESIGN load behaves essentially

ing the requirement is not necessary to
-bliis
OF COIUMN.
A single-story frame subject to lateral

In determin-
as a single-degree-of -freedom system.
for the columns vhich are the springs of the system it
use the equivalent system technique otherwise used in
manual for designing structural elements.

209
EM
15 Jan 58
7-50a
Combining the principles

of paragraph 6-11 and the equa-
tions from paragraph 7-06 results in a procedure for pre-
liminary design.
16'
""
In this pre-
"^
16'
16'
"^
"*
liminary design the girders are
assumed to be infinitely rigid to simplify the analysis.

The column height from the girder center line to the top of the footing is 13.75 ft.
5Hie
This dimension is used to determine the spring constant.
maximum resistance computation is based on the clear column height,
11.83 ft.
a.
Design Loading.
In the preliminary design it is an unnecessary

The design
refinement to use the dynamic reactions from the wall slabs.

load is idealized from the net lateral overpressure curve.
The height of
wall considered to load the frame is equal to half the clear height of the
wall plus the thickness of the roof slab
= 1*1.75
-i-
0.79 = 8.16
B* 537
kips
loading shown by figure 7.73 is defined by:
B . 25 3 psi .
.
0.061 sec
T = 0.061 sec
b.
Time (sec)
Mass Computation.
Bllrt)
Roof
[2i5ii22l + 6.0] !J L
= 122 kips
Girder (assumed)
columns (assêd)
2 vail Blabs
= 30 kips
- *6.6 kips
8 3 .0 kips
Mass of single-degree-of -freedom system

girder +
= 5-85
.
total roof slab + total

-f
-
1
3
columns +
11 ^ walls 3
122 + 30 + 0.33(26.6
83.0) L =L
210
First Ofrial
Actual Properti
Assume D.L.F. = 1.2 (experience)

= D.L.F.(B) = 1.2(537) = 645 k = Required = 6^5(11.83),
Mp
R^/^n
Estimated average roof pressure =
Average
"blast load per column =
Dead load per column
(122
4-
3C
Average column design load = PD =
"D
Let
- A
V
f
p = p
p"bt
= 0.015, d
= (t
7-5
As =
Substituting into previous Mp equal
955(12) = 0.015(l8)t(52)(t 2 + =
ll+.Ot
7-5)
-i
25. Ot
12,037
0,
solving
28
-
t = 28.4 in.
Try section 18 in. by 28 in., d = Assume d"/d = 3-75/2^.25 = 0.155,
3-75 = 2^.25 in.
m =
np + (n
l)p' = 0.15 + 9(0.015) = 0.285
q = np + (n
= 0.171 l)p' d"/<i = 0.15 + 9(0.015)0.155
k = 0.37
*
=
(tatle 11 RCDH of ACl)

3 *' y
bt 3 = 18(28 ) 3 =
IT
~^
^*
r-
3 = l8(2^.25) 3 2(C.37)(0.155) H /3]+ 9(0.015) |(c.37) [[(0.37) 2 2 + 0.135(0.137 - 0.37 ) (0.155) } + 0.15(1 J= 258,000 [0.0169 = 258,000(0.0626) = 21,300 in. 0.115 + 0.02U) +
IQ. = 0.5(1- + o
*J "
-
0.0595] = 0.5(32,900 + 21,300) = 27,100 in.
'
First Trial
3
Determination of DL.F.
12EIn = 12(3)103(27.100)^ = 10 "

3
li
(13-75)
1^
^ 50
kips / ft
eq 7-10)
= R /k = 6^5/30,^50 = 0.062 ft m
211
EM 1110-3^5-417 15 Jan 58
=
T-50e
6.28^5-85/10,450
0.
sec
T/Tn = 0.061/0.
D.L.F. = 1.06,
t
0.9*1-
(fig.
5-20)
= 0.9^(0.061) = 0.0575 sec
The original idealized load-time curve should be revised to obtain a
closer approximation to the total impulse up to time t

t = 0.060 sec in figure 7-73 is
The impulse up to

T = 2H/B = 2(0.898)/25.3 = 0.071 sec T/T = 0.071/0.148 = 0.48
D.L.F. = 1.15, t /T = 0.85 (fig. 5-20) m The revised idealized load is satisfactory because t
= 0.060 sec
= 0. 85(0.071)
Required
537(1^ JH.8
3 =
Required moment is less than available moment.

possible reduction in size.
e.
Let us investigate
Second Trial
Actual Properties.
-
ML =
As f d
,
dy
D fo.5t
(915)12 = 0.015(18 )t(52)(t

l4.0t
7-5) + 262
o. 5t -
262 1.7(18 J3-!
25. Ot
,j."
11,5V7 = 0, solving
'âe
t = 27.8 in.
u .,
fi^st trial proportions are satis-
An actual column section
is se-
d" = 3-687, d = 2^.32, d =

g
= 20.63
A^
= 8.0 in.
= 8.0/18(28) = 0.0159
7-51
EM 1110-3^5-^17 15 Jan 58
MO
8.0(52)(20.6 3 )
4-
262
l4 -
1>7
| J3>9
(eg
- 8600 + 3070
11,670 kip-In. = 970 kip-ft

I
Hie previously computed value of computation in paragraph 7-51.

7 ~ 51
will be satisfactory for the
DESIGN OF ROOF GIRDER. Die design of the girder in this example is performed in the same manner as the girder in paragraph 7-^3 since both girders are designed for elastic action. Reference should be made to para-
graph 7-11 for a detailed discussion of the design of roof girders.

The front girder span is critical. Previous considera-
tion of the variation of local roof overpressure with location
16'
16'
16'
along the span from front to back of the building has shown
I
777/7
L*I6.0'
that for the front girder the ncldent overpressure may be used as the local roof overpressure because bke maximum response of the girder generally occurs before the vortex ac-
tion has an opportunity to cause the local roof loading to vary strongly from the incident overpressure. This can be seen from a comparison of the
fcimes for maximum, displacement of the girders in tables 7-9> 7-21, and 7-26
with the local
overpressure data in paragrw.-nh 7-P3.

tee beam is considered*
4 fixed-pinned graph 6-20 and table

a.
6.k for design constants.

Die girder loading is obtainet
Load Determination,
7.77 from the numerical integration

7-29).
After
-to "be
for the roof slab (par. 7-^9&> table
t =
0.0*4-5
sec the load on the girder from the slab is assumed
equal to one-half the load on the slab.
The time required for the
shock front to traverse
the girder is considered in establishing the load-
slab reactions at the ends of the girder -time curve by plotting the dynamic rave to travel averaging over the span. The time required for the shock
and
tbe length of the girder
is
16
= O.OLlA sec
lag
1503
213
EM
15 Jan 58
7-51a
24
Multiply Average by 32 to Obtain Girder Load
20
o o 16
Front End of Girder
E o
12
Tr = 0.025
o b.
Of
Rear End of Girder 8
"O
o
^5
o o
Idealized Load-Time Curve
-J
Average
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.0114
*""
Time,t(sec)
blast
Figure 7.77.
Local and average slab dynamic reactions for incident overpressure,
wave
parallel to girder
7-5B>
The idealized load-time curve imp one side is indicated by the dashed lin
fig. 7-77.
The design load on the gird
fined by
B = 2(16.0) = 32.0 kips/ft T = 0.025 sec r

*>
Elastic Range Dynamic Design F
= 0.58,
= 0.45
(fig. 6.29)
k = f EI/L3 3
Rm = f M L l Ps/
pos = 0.26R + 0.12P 2P

= 0.43E + 0.19P
6.28),
c.
Mass Computation
= 40. 5 kips
Slab and roofing =
.0] = 1C.3 kips
Girder (estimate) =
Total mass =
d.
First Trial
Actual Properties.
9*
~
rial, i^ = Estimate tee beam action for first tr*
*^
Ass-ume D.L.F.(B) = 1.05 (experience)
Rm = D.L.F.(B)
= 1.05(32.0)16 = 5^c >ips
due to static Moment in girder at interior support (fixed support)
loads
=
WL
static loads Moment in girder at midspan due to
1.28
kip-ft
215
EM 1110-345-417
15 Jan 58
7-51d
Support moment from column
| Mp
(970) = 646 kip-ft (par.
7-H
and 7-50)
Midspan moment from column =

Support moment required for vertical blast loads
M . -
<o
kip-ft
Midspan moment due to vertical blast loads
= f
pos
M = 0.67(960) = 640 kip-ft n
Total support moment = 960 + 646 + 103 =* 1709 kip-ft + 58 = 698 kip-ft Total midspan moment = 640 +
Ratio of midspan tension reinforcing to interior support reinforcing
steel = 698/1709 = 0.41
= 0.688bd
= 1709(12) =
20,500 kip- in.

*
Try b = 20 in.
d = ^20,500/13.76 = 38-6 in. Try d = 38-5, b = 42 in.

Rectangular section at the support
Q
}
I. = 20(42)^/12 = 123,500 in. o
np = 10(12)/20(38.5) = 0.156 np = 10(6 )/20(38.5) = 0.078

!
m = np +
CL
(n
l)p' = 0.156 +
= 0.226 -^ (0.078)
= np + (n
l)p' Sj. = 0.156 +
^ (0.078) |g^| = 0.160

2
k = 0.39 (table 11, ECDH of ACl)

kd = 0.39(38.5) = 15-0 in.
I
^^
+ 12(10 )(2 3 .5)

66,14-00
+ 9(6)(12.T5)
= 22,500 +
I 1
+ 8,800 = 97,700 in.
= (I + g
It.)0.5
= 110,600 in.
216
7-51e
j?ee
section at midspan
Tension reinforcement at midspan =

2
-96(9. 5)
,
~ = _
2
_
20(32. 5 2
f
_ -4330 + ~ 911 +
'
96(9.5; + 20(32.5;
S3
1 = np + (n
-
= 231,400 in np = 10(5)/39-13(96) = 0.0133

np' = 10(3)/39.13(96) = O.OOBO m = np + (n - I)P! = 0.0133 +
l)p'
-jfi
(.C
-JQ
(
^-
= 0.0133 +
k = 0.145 (table 11, RCDH of ACl)
kd = 0.145(39.75) = 5.76 in.

o
I
"k
= 96(5-76}
J5
+ 9 (il ) (5 76
.
2.25
+ 10(8)(39.12 - 5-76r
I.
b
= 6150 + 443
= 0.5(l + I
g
4-
t)
89,000 = 95,600 in. 4 = 163,500 in.
1,/Ig
f,
= 110,600/163,500 = 0.68
= 9.0 (fig. 6.27) = 0.68 (fig. 5.25) = 246 (fig. 6.29)
f f
e.
First Trial
=
Deterriinaticr. of D.L.?.
,
k,
Vies 'ft
L3
T /T
r'
= 0.025/0.0189 = 1.325
D.L.F. = 1.2 (fig. 5.21)

t /T m r
1.25 (fig. 5-21); OK (see fig. 7-77)
Required
R = 1.2(32. 0)(l) = 615 kips

217
EM
15 Jan 58
7-5if
At the interior support section

.
0-0156(52)1 _ ~ 1?6o 1.7(3.9; J
The moment available at the support to resist the effects of vertical

"blast loads is
M = 1760
R
=
646
103 =
ion
kip-ft
The available resistance is then
f-jM/L
= 9.0(l01l)/l6 = 569.0 kips
This girder is inadequate, 569 < 6 15
Increase reinforcing at support to 13 bars and continue with same

girder.
f.
The moments of inertia will not change appreciably (par. 7-43).
Preliminary Design for Bond Stress. = 2R = 0. 62(615) = 381 kips Estimated V m
Allowable
=
u = 0.15f^ = 0.15(3000) = ^50 psi (par. U-09)

=
8(381,000)
_ 2 5 o in " r
= 13 #9 bars in two rows, A = 13 in. s

,_
in. ., P
g.
20(3.5)
Since the trial size is to be used for the numerical
integration with only minor modification, reference is made to the previous

computations for pertinent data.
girder weight
R
'
k *
Total mass = 1.59 kip-sec 2 /ft
estimte)
M = 1760
ye
=
103 -
kip ' ft
0.0047
ft
f_M
Maximum
y'
Deflection
"
~ y-i = 9 .0(115^
15"
...
y' p
Deflection, y (ft)
= 138,000 kips/ft
R,
figure 7.78.
Resistance
function for girder spanning 16 ft
ye = - k
138,000
ft
218
7-5lg
EM 1110-345-41? 15 Jan 58
Table 7.30. Determination of Maximum Deflection and Dynamic Reactions for Girder
is The basic equation for the numerical integration in table 7-30

4-
2y
(table
53)
At = 0.002 sec is approximately In table 7-30 the time interval

f
/10 = 0.00189 sec
(par. 5-08)
The dynamic reaction equations are listed

219
EM 1110-3^5-^17
15 Jan 58
7.5111
in paragraph 7-51b.
The P
values for the second column are obtained from
figure 7-77 multiplying by 2(l6) = 32 to account for the l6-ft-span length

of the girder and the two slabs loading the girder. = 0.0044 ft
h.
The (y
value
ye
The design is satisfactory for this consideration.
For interior support end of girder
(fixed end of idealized girder)
Vv
v v
= 371 ki^ s
( talDle
7' 3
ILlGUA.
For no shear reinforcement allowable v
5000p O.O^f^ = 0.04(3000) + 5000(0.0156) = 120 + 78 = 198 psi

4-
(eq.
_J*L
Tbd
^ 8(371,000) __ "
7(20)38.55
-
198 = 352 psi

y

352 ~ r ~ 40,000
.
Ery k
.
#H-
bars,
*~*
A S = 0.80
in.
.*.
r =
iFor
TT" DS
on^ = 0.0088;
= U.55 in., try
= h in.
exterior support end of girder (pinned end of idealized girder)
V
v
=227
kips (table 7.30)
= 0.0^(3000) + 5000(0.00133) = 120 + 6.6 = 127
' 6 v " JV. _ 8(227,000) _ 32b psl Tbd 7(20)39.75

r Try 4 #4 bars,
127 = 199
A S = 0.80
0.00^98:
in.
bs
""
.'.
s =
8.0 in.
20(s;
try
= 8 in.
8v - '8(371.000) . ~ ~ 72od 7(^6.0)38.55

O.ljf^
= 0.15(3000) = 1+50 psij
Allowable u =
i.
OK
Summary.
20- in. by ^2-in. tee beam
Maximum tension reinforcement = 13 ^9 bars

p = 0.0156
Zo = 46
in.
220
7-52
I
No.
EM 1110-345-417 15 Jan 58
8"
4 Stirrups at
t
42
Effective Section at B-B
Note: 2" Pcotection

for All Steel
42
Effective Section
atA-A
Shear reinforcement at interior end of girder, ^ $k at 4 in.

Shear reinforcement at exterior end of girder, 4
#Jf
at 8 in.
7-52
FINAL DESIGN OF COUJMN.

7-50.
Diis column design for elastic behavior was
begun in paragraph
The calculations which follow illustrate the
steps which are needed to determine the adequacy of the preliminary design.
The primary computation is a numerical integration in which is determined

the time variation of the lateral displacement of the top of the columns*
In the preliminary design idealized loads and resistances are used
in order to simplify the computations.

idealizations are no longer used.
In the final design, however, these
This results in consideration of the

(l) the variation of plastic
following factors
-which have "been neglected:
hinge moment with
direct stress, (2) the variation of column resistance
with, lateral deflection, (3) the effect of girder flexibility on the stiff-
ness of the frame, and
(k] the difference between the two design loads; one
determined from the product of the front face overpressure and the wall
area and the other determined from

a-
the vail slab dynamic reactions.
Mass Computation.
Roof slab = 122 kips (par. 7-50b)

Olraer stem ,
Columns =
. 37 . 3 klps
12(12)1000
klps
Walls = 83.0 kips (par. 7-50b)

221
EM 1110-345-417
15 Jan 58
7-52b
Mass of single-degree-of -freedom system = total roof slab +

122 + 37-3 + total girder + i (columns + vails) .
= 6.05 kip-sec 2/ft
b.
+ 83.0)
^3(2^.6
Column Properties
(See par. 7-50e.)
b = 18 in,, d
t = 28 in.,
d = 24.32 in.,
2
,
= 20.63 in. = 0.0183
= 3.687 in.,
=A^=8.0in.
p.p.. ^(32)
4.32)
M= Asfdyd'
,
1)
+ F-JO.Jt D\
_ 8.0(52)20.63 12
*D
12
-
1.7(18)3-!
= 716
o.ooo7P
Consideration of the relative
c.
Effect of Girder Flexibility.
flexibility of the girders and columns generally results in a value of the

frame elastic spring constant
which is less than the value obtained for
the assumption of infinitely stiff girders (par. 7-08) in the preliminary

design*
To obtain this revised value a simple sidesway analysis of the
frame is made.
From the sidesway analysis,
is the magnitude of the
lateral load required to cause unit displacement.

545
kips
,
Figure 7.79.
Sidesway analysis by moment distribution
The elastic sidesvay analysis (the results of which are shown in
figure 7-79) is performed for initial column moments of 1000 kip- ft at top
and bottom of each column.

the top of the column.
This is equivalent to a lateral displacement of
222
7-52d
x = (F.E.M.
6EI
)h
_ 1000(13.
6( 3 )10 (27,250)
3
Prom figure 7.79
B -
976) _
loading*.
The F
column of the nm
(table 7-31) is obtained from figure 7-80.

Table 7.3L Determination of Cc
is based on the
the vail slat analysis dynamic reaction coluzn of of wall are The dynamic reactions for a one-foot width (table 7.28). fra=e bay. <2ie portion of the curve multiplied by Ifl, the width of one on the net lateral overpressure curve (fig. after t = 0.025' sec is based in psi =y using fro= P net Here the values of F Q are obtained
V^
7.73).
11A(18)3.16 1000
^ r
net
=21.2?net ki~s *
.
dimension 8.l6
vail clear span plus the is eûal to one-half the front
roof slab thickness
-^
+ 0.79 - 8.16 ft.
223
EM ino-3^5-la7 15 Jan 58
7-52e
700
600
CO
Q.
500
O O
400
O
u.
0;
+-
O
21.2 P ne t
(Fig. 7,73)
O
O
18 V, n
OJ
(Table 7,28)
0.01
0,02
0,03
0,04
(sec)
0,05
0,06
Time,
Figure 7.80.
Frame design
lateral load
Numerical Integration Computation to Determine Column Adequacy. The total vertical load P in the second column is obtained by multiplying n
e*
the average roof overpressure (fig. 7.7!*) [5^(18) llOTJ/1000 = ihQ and addthe dead weight of the roof system ing The (P ) values are (159-3 kips). av n
7-52f
mn
the average axial column loads and are obtain^
tical load by the number of The columns, 4. in the formula of paragraph 7-52b to obtain f ^D^n is used in turn to obtain the maxim the relation
is equal to kx
= 10,000x in the el * n
The basic equation for the numerical in 7.31 is
n'
m
time interval At = 0.01 sec used in
natural period, T n
At =
2ir-^m/k
= 6. 28 ^6. 05/10, Ouu = u.i>4> sec
O.OK
T /10 = 0.015^5 sec (par. 5-08) n

(Rm ) n ,
In table 7-31 the design is elastic because R < n
i.e.. 7
606 <
689.
f,
Shear and Bond Stress.

= 151.5 kips (table 7-31)
Vmax
For no shear reinforcement, -f 5000p Allowable v = (eg O.Cfe^
k. 2k]
= O.CA-(3000) + 5000(0.0183) = 120 + 90 = 210 psi
v =
8V = Tbd
8(151,500)
-

3 #3 column ties,
= 6(0. 11) = 0.66 in.
210 = 185 psi 2
r =
= 7.95 in., use
r =
= 0.00li62 =
= 8 in.
225
M 1110-3^5-417
15 Jan 58
7-52g
So = 32.0 in.
8(151,500)
s 222 psi
f
0.15(3000)
T
-No. 3 Ties
Allowable u =
^50 pel; OK
20.63"
28"
g.
Summary.
18 in. by 28 in. tied column 2 A = A' = 8.0 in.

s
3 #3 ties at 8 in.
18"
Zo = 32.0 in.
DESIGN DETAILS
7-53
STRUCTURAL STEEL DETAILS.

"be
To illustrate the type of design details
that might
necessary, typical details for purlin to girder, girder to
column, and column to foundation connections are presented.
Purlin to Girder Connection.
The heavy end reactions and moments
make necessary both seat angles and web plates.
The web plates stiffen
the purlin web near the connection where the longitudinal stiffeners must
Spiral
Looped
I6VF36
around Slab Steel and Welded to Top Flange
Unless Otherwise Noted,

All Bevel
Welds Full Thickness of Port.
Middle Column
Purlin to Girder Connection
226
7-53
be cut.
The stiff eners on the girders are
held down by a steel spiral looped aroun*
purlin flange
Girder to Column Connection.
The
reaches a large value in the region betv
ing column veb reinforcing plates.
FI
IOYF77]
Col
Web Reinforcement
0.SIde*.7f"xfx3'-4" Shop Weld | Fillet At! Around, 4-1 Plugs 8 c-c
Down
Girder To Column Conn.
nnhimn to Foundation Coimection.

a the column to make possible
The base plate is shipped attached
sisrple connection
vith reliable and easily
welds. inspected shop
227
EM
15 Jan 58
-2"^ x 3'-2"Anclr Bolts
Anchor Plate
Base Plate:
<
it
8"x
lf"x2'-2"
24"x 2fx 2'-0"
Column
to
Foundation
7-5 1
*-
HEUilFORCED CONCRETE DETAILS.
Typical details are presented to suggest
possible treatments in critical locations.

Girder and Column Steel.
Bars at the intersection of the girder and
3No.9X8'-0"+2Hooks
Section
10 No.
A-A
9
Note: Use Equal Corner
Dowels Lopped 40D!a. or Bend Top Girder Bars
Down at Outer Cols a Weld to Bors in Outer Face of Col, Other Col Bars Bend Over 8 Extend 3'-9, Form Haunches as Shown. Column and Girder Steel to Have ('^Protection. Slob Steel 8 Foundation Steel Not Shown
Dowels
-
c{ , Side
-QLonq^
6No,9Section
B-B
Girder and Column Steel
228
15 Jan 58
the outer column are shown
butt-
'
Corner Dowels No. 8
<
welded although dowels may be

used.
Dowels are shown elseThe girder stirrups are
where.
bent to act as ties for bars in

conrpression.
Wall and Roof Slab Section.

Corner dowels are placed to
minimize any tendency to tear

out of the concrete due to either
inward or outward pressure.

Shear reinforcement is arranged
in a staggered pattern across
the face of the wall.
Roof Slob Shown at Midspan

Wall and Roof Slob Section
* U.
S.
GOVERNMENT
PRINTING
OFFICE
1975
568-671
229

TM 5-856-5

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

TM 5-856-5

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

TM 5-856-5

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

TM

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY TECHNICAL MANUAL

DESIGN OF STRUCTURES TO RESIST

THE EFFECTS OF ATOMIC

SINGLE-STORY FRAME BUILDING

Cir 310-28, 17 March 1965.

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY

D.C., 30 July 1965

of the the Secretary

K. JOHNSON, United States Army, General, Chief of Staff.

Corps of Engineers Army

ENGINEERING AND DESIGN

SINGLE-STORY FRAME BUILDINGS

REFERENCES a* References to Material in Otlier Manuals of This Series b. List of Symbols

MOMENT RESISTANCE OF COLUMNS

THE EFFECT OF DIRECT STRESS ON COHJMN RESISTANCE

EFFECT OF LATERAL DEFLECTION ON COHJMN RESISTANCE

NUMERICAL INTEQ^ATION ANALYSIS

DESION OF HALL SLAB a Design Loading

DESIGff OF ROOF SLAB a. loading

DESIGN OF ROOF PURLINS

raTCLTMTMARy DESIGN OF COLUMNS

NUMERICAL EXAMPLE^ DESIGN OF A ONE-STORY STEEL FRAME BUILDING - EIASTIC BEHAVIOR

DESIGN OF WALL 8MB Design Loading

113 11^ Ilk 115 116

118 120 120

120 121 126 128 128

131 132 132 133 133

152 152 152 153

155 156 158 159

159 159 160 162 163 163

165 168 169

mZZmUStKHX COIZMN DESIGN

169 170 170 170

DESIGN OF ROOF SLAB a. Design Loading b. Dynamic Design Factors

206 206 206 207

207 209 209

FRELIMIMRY DESIGN OF COLUMN"

209 210 210 211 211 212

221 221 222 222 223

STRUCTURAL STEEL DETAILS

REINFORCED CONCRETE DETAILS

Corps of Engineers Amor

ENGINEERING AND DESIGN

SINGLE-STORY FRAME BUILDINGS

PURPOSE AND SCOPE.

This manual is one in a series issued for the

guidance of engineers engaged in the design of permanent type military

cable to all Corps of Engineers activities and installations responsible

for the design of military construction*

The material is based on the results of full-scale atomic tests and

Continuing studies are in progress and supplemental

Much of the basic analytical work

The Massachusetts Institute of Tech-

gestions for improvement be transmitted to HQDA (DAEN-MCE-D)

Engineering and Design,

containing interrelated subject matter are listed as follows:

DESIGN OF STRUCTURES TO RESIST THE EFFECTS OF ATOMIC WEAPONS

EM 1110-3^5-413 EM 1110-3^5-^1^ EM 1110-3^5-415

EM 1110-3U5-l*l6 EM 1110-31*5-1*17 EM 1110-31*5-^18 EM 1110-31*5-1*19 EM 1110-31*5-^20 EM 1110-31*5-1*21

EM 1110-3U5-ll6 EM 1110-315-117 EM 1110-315-^18 EM 1110-315-119 EM 1110-315-^20 EM 1110-315-1*21