RFBT 05 Partnerships
RFBT 05 Partnerships
RFBT 05 Partnerships
LAW ON PARTNERSHIPS
CONTRACT OF PARTNERSHIP, IN GENERAL
PARTNERSHIP is a contract whereby two or more persons bind themselves to contribute money, property or industry to a
common fund, with the intention of dividing the profits among themselves, or in order to exercise a profession.
CHARACTERISTICS:
1. Consensual
2. Bilateral or Multilateral
3. Nominate
4. Principal
5. Onerous
6. Preparatory
Principles applicable: There must be Affectio Societatis – the desire to formulate an ACTIVE union with people among
whom there exist mutual confidence and trust.
In connection thereto, the principle of Delectus Personae (Personal Choices), which pertains to the right to choose who to
associate with, is also applicable.
PURPOSE: can either be for the intention of dividing the profits among themselves, or in order to exercise a profession.
Nevertheless, it is required that a partnership must have a LAWFUL object or purpose, otherwise it may be declared dissolved
by judicial decree, and the profits shall be confiscated in favor of the state.
PARTNERSHIP CORPORATION
Creation Voluntary agreement of parties. Created by the state in the form of a special charter
or by a general enabling law (The Corporation Code)
Number of Two or more Not more than 15
Organizers
Existence No time limit except agreement of parties With perpetual existence
Liability of may extend to personal properties Liable only upto their capital contributions
owners
Transferability All partners need to consent to the transfer of Does not need the consent of the other stockholders.
of interest interest to another
Ability of owners Generally, partners acting on behalf of the Generally, stockholders cannot bind corporations
to bind the firm partnership are agents thereof since its official acts are through a board of directors
Remedies in A partner can sue another partner who A stockholder cannot sue a director who
case of mismanages mismanages, it must be in the name of the
mismanagement corporation, through a derivative suit
Nationality A partnership is a national of the country where Generally, under whose laws it was created as to
it was created, and dependent on percentage of whether domestic or foreign, and as to nationality,
ownership. on the ownership of the outstanding capital stock
Legal from the time the contract begins Generally from issuance of COR
Personality
Right of None. Death, retirement, insolvency, civil Yes. Such causes do not dissolve a corporation.
Succession interdiction, or insanity of a partner dissolves
the partnership.
SEPARATE JURIDICAL PERSONALITY: The partnership has a judicial personality separate and distinct from that of each of
the partners. The partnership can, in general:
1. Acquire and possess property of all kinds;
2. Incur obligations;
3. Bring civil or criminal actions;
4. Adjudged insolvent even if the individual members be each financially solvent.
Except: A contract of partnership is void, whenever immovable property is contributed thereto, if an inventory of said property
is not made, signed by the parties, and attached to the public instrument.
Capital is P3,000 or more – the contract of partnership must appear in a public instrument, which must be recorded in the SEC.
This does not in any way affect validity of the partnership as it is intended only to affect third persons.
KINDS OF PARTNERSHIPS
According to OBJECT:
1. Universal:
In case of ambiguity: If the Articles of Universal Partnership does not specify the nature of the Universal Partnership, it
is deemed that what is constituted is only a universal partnership of profits.
Persons not allowed to form a universal partnership: those who cannot donate to each other, namely:
a. Husband and Wife (Art. 133)
b. Those guilty of adultery and concubinage (Art. 739);
c. Those guilty of the same criminal offense, if the partnership was entered into in consideration of the same (Art. 739);
According to LIABILITY:
1. General where all the partners are general partners whose liability extends to their individual properties, after the assets
of the partnership have been exhausted;
2. Limited where at least one of the partners are liable only up to the extent of his contribution.
According to TERM:
1. Partnership with a fixed term or particular undertaking - upon arrival of the fixed term or fulfilment of a particular
undertaking;
2. Partnership at will – when there is no fixed term or particular undertaking.
KINDS OF PARTNERS
ACCORDING TO CONTRIBUTION:
1. Capitalist Partners – contributes capital; and
2. Industrial Partners – furnishes industry or labor.
3. Capitalist-Industrial Partners – furnishes both.
AS TO LIABILITY:
1. General Partners - liable upto his personal assets.
2. Limited Partners – liable upto his capital contributions only.
Risk of Loss:
LOSS BORNE BY THE PARTNER:
a. Thing contributed is specific and determinate which is NOT fungible and only their use and fruits may be for the
common benefit; and
b. There is stipulation that he shall bear the loss of the thing brought and appraised in the inventory.
2. To give additional contribution in case of imminent losses: In case of an imminent loss of the business of the
partnership, any partner who refuses to contribute an additional share to the capital to save the venture, shall he obliged
to sell his interest to the other partners. Except:
a. Industrial partners except if there is stipulation that he will likewise contribute
b. If there is stipulation to the contrary
b. Capitalist partners – the prohibition is limited to businesses in the same industry as that of the partnership which may
result in competition. Exceptions:
i. When it is expressly stipulated that the capitalist partner can so engage himself;
ii. When the other partners allow him to do so, whether expressly or impliedly;
iii. During the period of liquidation and winding up, when the partnership is already non-existent.
iv. When the general-capitalist partner becomes a limited partner in a competitive enterprise.
Effect of non-compliance:
i. He shall bring to the partnership all the profits illegally obtained;
ii. He is liable, personally, for all the losses;
iii. He may be ousted for loss of trust and confidence.
4. Credit to the firm the payment made by a debtor who owes both the partnership and the managing partner
MANAGING PARTNER COLLECTING FROM A COMMON DEBTOR: To prevent the managing partner from furthering his
personal interest to the detriment of the firm, if such managing partner collects a sum from a common debtor who owes
money both to said partner and to the partnership:
a. If the managing partner issued a receipt in the name of the partnership: the payment shall be applied to the partnership
credit;
b. If the managing partner issued a receipt in his name: the payment shall be applied proportionate to the amounts of
the two debts. EXCEPT: When the debt owed by the debtor to the managing partner is more onerous, the debtor may
choose to apply the payment exclusively to such
1. FIRM NAME: Every partnership shall operate under a firm name, which may or may not include the name of one or more
of the partners.
2. LIABILITY AFTER EXHAUSTION OF PARTNERSHIP ASSETS: All partners, including industrial ones, shall be liable pro
rata with all their property and after all the partnership assets have been exhausted, for the contracts which may be
entered into in the name and for the account of the partnership, under its signature and by a person authorized to act for
the partnership. However, any partner may enter into a separate obligation to perform a partnership contract.
3. AUTHORITY TO ACT FOR AND IN BEHALF OF THE PARTNERSHIP: Every partner is an agent of the partnership for
the purpose of its business.
The authority of the partner to act in behalf of the partnership may be:
a. Express – those expressly granted to the partner; or
b. Implied – those which may be implied from the express authority; or
c. Apparent – when he apparently carries on the usual business of the partnership and the person to whom he is dealing
has no knowledge of the fact that he has no such authority.
If the partner is not carrying on the usual business of the partnership, the act will not bind the partnership unless it is
authorized by the other partners.
Except when authorized by the other partners or unless they have abandoned the business.
Admission of Partners: an admission made by one partner within he scope of his authority is evidence against the partnership
.
Notice to a Partner: operates as notice to the partnership, except in case of fraud committed by such partner.
5. SOLIDARY LIABILITY FOR TORTS/QUASI-DELICT: Where, by any wrongful act or omission of any partner acting
in the ordinary course of the business of the partnership or with the authority of co-partners, loss or injury is
caused to any person, not being a partner in the partnership, or any penalty is incurred, the partnership is liable therefor
to the same extent as the partner so acting or omitting to act.
6. SOLIDARY LIABILITY FOR MISAPPROPRIATION: The partnership is bound to make good the loss, in two situations:
a. Pertains to partner as receiver: Where one partner acting within the scope of his apparent authority receives money
or property of a third person and misapplies it.
b. Pertains to partnership as receiver: Where the partnership in the course of its business receives money or property
of a third person and the money or property so received is misapplied by any partner while it is in the custody of the
partnership.
In both 5 and 6 above, all partners are solidarily liable with each other and the partnership.
7. PARTNER BY ESTOPPEL:
a. One who represents himself as a partner of an existing partnership with or without consent of the partnership:
i. When the partnership consented – a partnership by estoppel is created between the original members and the
deceiver. A partnership liability results.
ii. When the partnership did NOT consent – deceiver becomes a partner by estoppel where he is liable as a partner
but does not acquire the rights thereof. No partnership liability exists. Only those who consented shall be liable.
b. One who represents himself as a partner of a NON-existent partnership. Liability of parties is pro rata, since there is
no partnership liability.
RIGHTS OF A PARTNER
DISTRIBUTION OF PROFITS:
a. In accordance with the agreement as to the distribution of profits;
b. If there was no such agreement, in proportion to contribution and the industrial partner shall receive such share as
may be just and equitable.
DISTRIBUTION OF LOSSES:
a. In accordance with agreement as to distribution of losses;
b. If there was no agreement as to losses, same proportion as to the agreement as to profits;
c. If no agreement as to losses and profits, in proportion to contribution but the industrial partner shall not be liable for
losses.
An industrial may be made liable for losses only if there was stipulation to that effect.
Void Stipulation: A stipulation which excludes one or more partners from any share in the profits or losses is void, this is
otherwise known as Pactum Leonina.
b. His interest in the partnership - A partner's interest in the partnership is his share of the profits and surplus.
Note: for limited partners, their interest may only be redeemed with the separate property of the general partners and
not with the property of the partnership.
RULES ON MANAGEMENT
i. ONE MANAGING PARTNER
MANAGING PARTNER in the ARTICLES OF PARTNERSHIP: May execute all acts of administration, in good faith, even
with opposition from the other partners;
The power to execute all acts of administration can only be revoked if (a) with just or lawful cause; and (2) by a vote of
the partners representing the controlling interest.
MANAGING PARTNER AFTER PARTNERSHIP HAS BEEN CONSTITUTED: The power as manager may be revoked by
a vote of the partners representing the controlling interest EVEN WITHOUT just or lawful cause.
1) With stipulation that no Managing Partner may act without the consent of the others – no one can perform an act of
administration without the others’ consent.
2) With Specification of Duties – each Managing Partner can perform an act of administration within their respective
duties.
3) Without specification of their respective duties, or without a stipulation that one of them shall not act without the
consent of all the others:
a) Each managing partner may separately execute all acts of administration;
b) Should one of the managing partners oppose the act of another, the matter shall be decided by a majority of the
managing partners per head count;
c) Should there be a tie in the votes of the managing partners, the controlling interest of ALL the partners shall
prevail.
iii. NO MANAGING PARTNER; WITH STIPULATION THAT NO PARTNER CANNOT ACT WITHOUT THE SUPPORT OF
PARTNERS: the concurrence of all shall be necessary for the validity of the acts, and the absence or disability of any one
of them cannot be alleged.
All the partners shall be considered agents and whatever any one of them may do alone shall bind the partnership,
without prejudice to the provisions of Article 1801 (on Multiple Managing Partners)
Except: None of the partners may, without the consent of the others, make any important alteration in the immovable
property of the partnership, even if it may be useful to the partnership.
Exception to the exception: if the refusal of consent by the other partners is manifestly prejudicial to the interest of
the partnership, the court's intervention may be sought.
Dissolution of a partnership is the change in the relation of the partners caused by any partner ceasing to be associated in the
carrying on as distinguished from the winding up of the business.
On dissolution the partnership is not terminated, but continues until the winding up of partnership affairs is completed.
Winding up: on the other hand, is the process of settling business affairs after dissolution.
Termination: is the point where all the partnership affairs have been wound up.
CAUSES OF DISSOLUTION:
Judicial causes: where the dissolution of the partnership is decreed by the court:
1. A partner has been declared insane in any judicial proceeding or is shown to be of unsound mind;
2. A partner becomes in any other way incapable of performing his part of the partnership contract;
3. A partner has been guilty of such conduct as tends to affect prejudicially the carrying on of the business;
4. A partner wilfully or persistently commits a breach of the partnership agreement, or otherwise so conducts himself in
matters relating to the partnership business that it is not reasonably practicable to carry on the business in partnership
with him;
5. The business of the partnership can only be carried on at a loss;
6. Other circumstances render a dissolution equitable.
Note that in all the above judicial causes, a trial will be necessary to prove the facts necessary to dissolve the partnership.
EFFECTS OF DISSOLUTION:
1. The mutual agency is terminated. As a rule, the partners can no longer act to bind the partnership, subject to the following
rules:
a. If the cause of the dissolution is Acts, Insolvency or Death (AID) – NOTICE should be given by the partners to terminate
the mutual agency
b. If the cause is NOT AID – the mutual agency is terminated and the dissolution is binding even without notice.
2. The following acts are still binding even after dissolution:
a. Acts to for winding-up of the affairs of the partnership
b. Contracts with creditors who had no notice of the dissolution
3. The partners may continue the partnership after dissolution of the old partnership. Such continuation still dissolves the old
partnership and a new partnership is created. The creditors of the old partnership are also creditors of the person or
partnership continuing the business.
WINDING UP OR LIQUIDATION
This is the process of liquidating the partnership assets and the distributing the proceeds to satisfy the claims against the
partnership.
Note: that in the distribution of a Limited Partnership’s assets, priority is given to the share of partners as to the profits over
their share as to capital.
Partner’s Liability: in case the assets of the partnership are not sufficient to cover the liabilities, the remaining claims may be
satisfied against the separate assets of the partners.
However, where a partner has become insolvent, the claims against his separate property shall be satisfied in the following
order:
1. Those owing to separate creditors;
2. Those owing to partnership creditors;
3. Those owing to partners by way of contribution.
LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
Limited Partnership: is one formed by two or more persons having as members one or more general partners and one or
more limited partners.
Limited liability: a limited partners’ liability is limited only to his capital contribution. Such that, after exhaustion of partnership
assets, he cannot be made to contribute to answer the remaining liabilities to third parties.
However, the assignee does not necessarily become a substitute limited partner.
i. Substitute Limited Partner: A Substituted Limited Partner is a person admitted to all the rights of a limited partner who
has died or has assigned his interest in a partnership: Provided:
1) All the partners consent;
2) The assignor (Limited Partner), being thereunto empowered by the certificate, gives the assignee that right.
ii. The substitute has all the rights and powers and is subject to all the restrictions and liabilities of his assignor except
those liabilities of which he was ignorant at the time he became a limited partner and which could not be ascertained
from the certificate.
1) The substitution does not release the original limited partner from liability to the partnership.
2) If the assignee does not become an substitute, he has no right to require any information or account of the
partnership books; he is only entitled to receive the share of the profits or other compensation by way of income
or the return of his contribution to which his assignor would otherwise be entitled; The assignee is still an
OUTSIDER to the Partnership.
Limited Partners’ Interest: or his share in the profits and surplus may likewise be the subject of assignment or
attachment/execution. However, unlike the interest of a general partner, a limited partners’ interest may only be redeemed
with the general partners’ property and not with partnership property.
a. The right, if given, of the partners to admit additional limited partners;
b. The right, if given, of one or more of the limited partners to priority over other limited partners, as to contributions or as
to compensation by way of income, and the nature of such priority;
c. The right, if given, of the remaining general partner or partners to continue the business on the death, retirement, civil
interdiction, insanity or insolvency of a general partner; and
d. The right, if given, of a limited partner to demand and receive property other than cash in return for his contribution.
The said certificate will be filed with the SEC and a limited partnership is formed if there has been substantial compliance in
good faith with the foregoing requirements. If such certificate is not filed, the partnership may be liable in the same manner as
a general partnership.
If a limited partner contributed industry, or his name appears in the partnership name (except for the above exceptions) and/or
took part in the management of the partnership, he shall be liable as if he is a general partner.
Any violation of the above restrictions would be in fraud of creditors and may thus be treated as a rescissible contract.
GENERAL-LIMIED PARTNER: A person may be a general partner and a limited partner in the same partnership, provided that
this fact is stated in the certificate.
Grounds: The retirement, death, insolvency, insanity or civil interdiction of a GENERAL PARTNER dissolves the partnership.
Except: If the partnership business is continued by the remaining general partners under a right to do so as stated in the
Certificate of Limited Partnership OR with the consent of all the partners.
A limited partner may have the partnership dissolved and its affairs wound up when he rightfully but unsuccessfuly demands
the return of his contribution.
2. First Statement: As a general rule, the partners are the agents of the partnership; hence, acts of the partners for the
account of the partnership are binding not only on the partnership but also on the partners.
Second Statement: Whatever acts the stockholders might execute for the account of the corporation, either individually or
collectively, are not binding on the corporation.
A. Only the first statement is true. C. Both statements are true.
B. Only the second statement is true. D. None of the statements is true.
4. It refers to a partnership which comprises all that the partners may acquire by their industry or work during the existence of
the partnership.
A. Universal partnership of profits C. Partnership of all present property
B. Particular partnership of profits D. Partnership of all present profits
5. It refers to partners who can be held liable for partnership obligations even to the extent of their private property.
A. General C. Capitalist
B. Limited D. Industrial
6. It refers to partners who contribute only their skill or industry to the common fund.
A. Capitalist C. Silent
B. Managing D. Industrial
9. It refers to partners who represent themselves, or consent to another or others representing them to anyone as partners
either in an existing partnership or in one that is fictitious or apparent.
A. Partners by estoppel C. Ostensible
B. Secret D. Managing
10. First Statement: If the partnership is general, it may be constituted in any form, except where immovable property or real
rights are contributed to the common fund, in which case a public instrument, to which is attached an inventory of said
property, signed by any of the partners, shall be necessary for validity.
11. First Statement: If the partnership is limited, it is required that the contracting parties, in addition to the
formalities prescribed for the organization of a general partnership, shall execute a certificate of limited partnership
which must be recorded in the office of the SEC.
Second Statement: The formalities for a limited partnership must be complied with, otherwise, the partnership is not limited
but general.
A. Only the first statement is true. C. Both statements are true.
B. Only the second statement is true. D. None of the statements is true.
12. If there is agreement only with respect to the profits, how shall the losses be distributed?
A. Same proportion as their share in the capital
B. Same proportion as their share in the profits
C. Partners shall meet and determine the shares.
D. No loss shall be distributed.
13. If there is no agreement as to the distribution of profits and losses, how are the profits distributed to the capitalist partner?
A. Just and equitable under the circumstances
B. No entitlement
C. Profits go to the reserve fund.
D. In proportion to what he may have contributed to the common fund
14. If there is no agreement as to the distribution of profits and losses, how shall the losses be distributed to the industrial
partner?
A. In proportion to what he may have contributed to the common fund
B. Just and equitable under the circumstances
C. No liability
D. Profits go to the reserve fund.
15. What is the status of an agreement whereby one or more partners shall not share in the profits and losses?
A. Void C. Voidable
B. Valid D. Unenforceable
17. Can a capitalist partner engage in a business similar to the kind of business in which the partnership is engaged?
A. Yes, if he has extra available capital.
B. Yes, if he brings with him another capitalist partner.
C. No, unless there is a stipulation to the contrary.
D. Never, as the prohibition is absolute.
18. Jean and John are partners in a certain business, Jean being the managing partner. Ruth owes Jean P50,000 and the
partnership P100,000, and both credits are demandable. Ruth pays Jean P30,000 and Jean issues a receipt in her name.
How much is Jean entitled to apply to her credit?
A. P10,000 C. P30,000
B. P20,000 D. Nothing
19. Jean and John are partners in a certain business, Jean being the managing partner. Ruth owes Jean P50,000 and the
partnership P100,000, and both credits are demandable. Ruth pays Jean P30,000 and Jean issues a receipt in the
partnership’s name. How much should Jean apply to the partnership’s credit?
A. Nothing C. P20,000
B. P30,000 D. P10,000
20. Jean and John are partners in a certain business, Jean being the managing partner. Ruth owes Jean P50,000 (more
onerous) and the partnership P100,000, and both credits are demandable. Ruth pays Jean P30,000 and Jean issues a
receipt in the partnership’s name. How much should Jean apply to the partnership’s credit?
A. Nothing C. P20,000
B. P30,000 D. P10,000
21. The management of the partnership may be vested (1) in the articles of the partnership and/or (2) after the
partnership had already been constituted.
A. 1 only C. Neither of 2
B. 2 only D. Either of 2
22. If there is no agreement on who will manage the partnership, it is vested in:
A. The partner with highest contribution
B. The partners with majority stake
C. All of the partners
D. The oldest partner
24. Ruth, Carlo, Maricel, and Dustin organized a general partnership, with Ruth and Carlo as industrial partners and Maricel,
who contributed P30,000 to the common fund, and Dustin, who contributed P10,000 to the common fund as capitalist
partners. Nobody was appointed managing partner. When the firm commenced business operations, the Ruth and Carlo
appointed Olive as accountant of the firm. A year later, Ruth decided to dismiss Olive, but this was opposed by Carlo. How
can the conflict between Ruth and Carlo be resolved in case of a tie?
A. Majority of the partners will decide.
B. Dustin and Maricel will decide.
C. Maricel will decide.
D. Ruth prevails.
25. Gem, Mondy and Maddie formed a general partnership with the following contributions to the common fund: Gem,
P20,000; Mondy, P40,000; Maddie, P60,000. There was agreement on the division of profits and apportionment of
losses proportionate to their capital contributions. After some years of business operations, the assets of the partnership
dwindled to P30,000, so the partners agreed to stop their business. The partnership is indebted to Sansa for a loan of
P120,000. Under the circumstances, how much can Sansa collect from the partners?
A. Gem, P15,000; Mondy, P30,000; Maddie, P45,000
B. Gem, P20,000; Mondy, P40,000; Maddie, P60,000
C. Gem, P30,000; Mondy, P30,000; Maddie, P30,000
D. Gem, P40,000; Mondy, P40,000; Maddie, P40,000
26. Rosh, Juju and Anna formed a partnership under the where Rosh’s participation is 40%; Juju, 40%; and Anna, 20%.
Rosh and Juju would supply the entire capital. Anna would contribute her management expertise and be manager for
the first 5 years without compensation. They also agreed that Anna shall not liable for losses. Unfortunately, the
partnership became bankrupt. Who can remove Anna as manager?
A. Rosh
B. Juju
C. None
D. The partner/s with controlling interest
27. Rosh, Juju and Anna formed a partnership under the where Rosh’s participation is 40%; Juju, 40%; and Anna, 20%.
Rosh and Juju would supply the entire capital. Anna would contribute her management expertise and be manager for
the first 5 years without compensation. They also agreed that Anna shall not liable for losses. Unfortunately, the
partnership became bankrupt. What is the status of the agreement exempting Anna from losses?
A. Valid C. Voidable
B. Void D. Unenforceable
28. It refers to that moment when partnership affairs are wound up.
A. Winding up C. Termination
B. Dissolution D. Liquidation
29. When does the right of a partner to demand an accounting of the partnership business prescribes?
A. 4 years upon the dissolution of the partnership when the final accounting is done.
B. 4 years upon the dissolution of the partnership before the final accounting is done.
C. 5 years upon the dissolution of the partnership when the final accounting is done.
D. 5 years upon the dissolution of the partnership before the final accounting is done.
33. If the partnership is a limited partnership, the order of payment is as follows, those to: (1) creditors, in the order of
priority as provided by law, except those to limited partners on account of their contributions, and to general partners,
(2) limited partners in respect to their share of the profits and other compensation by way of income on their
contributions, (3) limited partners in respect to the capital of their contributions,
(4) general partners other than for capital and profits, (5) general partners in respect to profits, and (6) general partners
in respect to capital.
A. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 C. 1, 2, 4, 3, 5, 6
B. 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 5 D. 1, 2, 3, 5, 4, 6
34. Dissolution is caused when a specific thing, which had promised to contribute to the partnership, perishes
A. Upon the delivery
B. Before the delivery
C. After the delivery
D. After the partnership acquires ownership thereof
35. On application by or for a partner, the court shall decree a dissolution whenever:
A. A partner becomes in any other way capable of performing his part of the partnership contract.
B. A partner has been innocent of such conduct as tends to affect prejudicially the carrying on of the
business.
C. A partner has been declared insane in any judicial proceeding or is shown to be of unsound mind.
D. A partner unwillfully or persistently commits breach of the partnership agreement, or otherwise so conducts
himself in matter relating to the partnership business that it is not reasonably practicable to carry on the
business in partnership with him.
36. First Statement: The court can decree a dissolution if the business of the partnership can only be carried on at a loss.
Second Statement: The court can decree a dissolution if the circumstances render a dissolution equitable.
A. Only first statement is true.
B. Only second statement is true.
C. Both statements are true.
D. None of the statements is true.
37. On the application of the purchaser of a partner’s interest, dissolution is caused (1) at the termination of the specific term
or particular undertaking, or (2) at any time if the partnership was a partnership at will when the interest was assigned or
when the charging order was issued.
A. 1 only C. None of them
B. 2 only D. Both of them
38. The dissolution of the partnership terminates all authority of the managing partner or of any partner, as the case may
be, to act for the partnership, except (1) acts necessary to wind up partnership affairs, (2) acts necessary to complete
transactions begun but not then finished, and (3) acts or transactions which would bind the partnership if dissolution had
not taken place.
A. 1 and 2 only C. 2 and 3 only
B. 1 and 3 only D. All three
39. If the winding up or liquidation of partnership affairs is judicial, who has the right or duty to wind up or liquidate
partnership affairs?
A. Partner or legal representative or assignee designated by the partners
B. Partner or legal representative or assignee designated by the court
C. Managing partner
D. Notary public
40. When there is no managing partner, or even when there is, he dies, the right or duty to wind up or liquidate partnership
affairs devolves upon the (1) partners who have not wrongfully dissolved the partnership, or
(2) legal representative of the last surviving partner, not insolvent.
A. 1 only C. Any of the two
B. 2 only D. None of the two
ANSWER KEY