1|Page

TITLE: Analyzing cyber crime trends and developing mitigation strategies

TEAM MEMBERS:
• AAKASH.S
• KIRTHIK SARVASH.S
• HANEYSH.R
• JAI EESWAR.S
• AHAMED ASARUDEEN

Project Overview

This project aims to comprehensively analyze current trends in cyber crime and develop
effective mitigation strategies to protect organizations and individuals. The project will
involve data collection, analysis of cyber crime patterns, identification of vulnerabilities,
and formulation of strategic defense mechanisms.

Objectives

1. Identify and Analyze Cyber Crime Trends:

o Study recent cyber crime incidents and gather data on common attack
vectors.
o Analyze trends such as the rise in ransomware, phishing attacks, and data
breaches.
o Understand the methods and motivations of cyber criminals.
2. Assess Vulnerabilities:
o Evaluate common vulnerabilities in systems, networks, and human
factors.
o Conduct risk assessments to identify potential points of failure.
3. Develop Mitigation Strategies:
o Formulate comprehensive cybersecurity policies and best practices.
o Develop technical solutions such as improved encryption methods,
intrusion detection systems, and secure authentication protocols.
o Implement training programs to enhance awareness and preparedness
among employees and users.
4. Implement and Test Solutions:
o Deploy mitigation strategies within a controlled environment to test their
effectiveness.
o Continuously monitor and update defenses based on feedback and
emerging threats.

Methodology

1. Data Collection and Research:

1|Page
2|Page

o Gather data from cybersecurity reports, incident databases, and case

studies.
o Conduct interviews with cybersecurity experts and organizations affected
by cyber crime.
2. Trend Analysis:
o Use statistical tools and machine learning algorithms to identify patterns
and predict future trends.
o Map out the evolution of cyber threats over recent years.
3. Vulnerability Assessment:
o Perform penetration testing and vulnerability scanning on systems and
networks.
o Analyze human factors through social engineering assessments.
4. Strategy Development:
o Design multi-layered security frameworks combining technical,
administrative, and physical controls.
o Create incident response plans and disaster recovery strategies.
5. Implementation and Testing:
o Simulate cyber attacks to test the robustness of the developed strategies.
o Collect performance data and refine strategies based on testing
outcomes.

Expected Outcomes

1. Comprehensive Report on Cyber Crime Trends:

o Detailed documentation of current and emerging cyber threats.
o Analysis of cyber crime patterns and prediction of future trends.
2. Vulnerability Assessment Reports:
o Identification of critical vulnerabilities in systems and networks.
o Recommendations for strengthening security postures.
3. Mitigation Strategy Toolkit:
o A set of best practices, policies, and technical solutions for cyber crime
prevention.
o Training materials and awareness programs for organizations and
individuals.
4. Tested and Validated Security Solutions:
o Deployed and tested cybersecurity measures with documented results.
o Continuous improvement framework for adaptive cybersecurity defense.

Key Stakeholders

• Project Team: Cybersecurity analysts, IT professionals, and data scientists.

• Organizations and Businesses: Entities seeking to enhance their cybersecurity
posture.
• Cybersecurity Experts: External advisors providing insights and
recommendations.
• End Users: Individuals who will benefit from increased awareness and training.

2|Page
3|Page

Conclusion

This project aims to provide a robust framework for understanding and mitigating cyber
crime. By analyzing trends, assessing vulnerabilities, and developing strategic defenses,
organizations can better protect themselves against the ever-evolving landscape of
cyber threats.

Software Requirements for Analyzing Cyber Crime Trends and Developing Mitigation Strategies :

To effectively analyze cyber crime trends and develop robust mitigation strategies, the
project will require a suite of software tools and systems. These software requirements
can be categorized into several key areas: data collection, data analysis, vulnerability
assessment, strategy development, and implementation/testing.

1. Data Collection and Management

• Web Scraping Tools:

o Beautiful Soup or Scrapy: For extracting data from websites and online sources.
o Selenium: For automating web browsers to scrape dynamic content.
• Database Management Systems (DBMS):
o MySQL or PostgreSQL: For storing large volumes of structured data.
o MongoDB: For storing unstructured or semi-structured data.
• APIs and Integration Tools:
o Postman: For testing and managing APIs to collect data from various sources.
o Zapier: For automating data integration from different platforms.

2. Data Analysis

• Statistical Analysis Tools:

o R or Python (with libraries like Pandas, NumPy, SciPy): For statistical analysis and
data manipulation.
o MATLAB: For advanced statistical and numerical analysis.
• Machine Learning and AI Tools:
o TensorFlow or PyTorch: For developing machine learning models to identify patterns
and predict trends.
o Scikit-learn: For implementing basic machine learning algorithms.
• Visualization Tools:
o Tableau or Power BI: For creating interactive dashboards and visualizing data trends.
o Matplotlib and Seaborn (Python libraries): For creating detailed charts and graphs.

3. Vulnerability Assessment

• Penetration Testing Tools:

o Metasploit: For conducting penetration tests and exploiting vulnerabilities.
o Nmap: For network discovery and security auditing.
o OWASP ZAP (Zed Attack Proxy): For finding vulnerabilities in web applications.
• Vulnerability Scanning Tools:
o Nessus: For scanning networks and identifying potential vulnerabilities.
o OpenVAS: An open-source tool for vulnerability scanning.

3|Page
4|Page

• Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) Systems:

o Splunk: For monitoring, searching, and analyzing machine-generated data.
o ArcSight: For providing comprehensive visibility and analysis of security events.

4. Strategy Development

• Policy Management Tools:

o Confluence: For documenting and managing cybersecurity policies and procedures.
o SharePoint: For collaboration and document management.
• Risk Management Tools:
o RSA Archer: For managing risk, compliance, and audit processes.
o LogicManager: For risk management and policy documentation.

5. Implementation and Testing

• Development and Testing Environments:

o Virtual Machines (VMware, VirtualBox): For creating isolated environments to test
security measures.
o Docker: For containerizing applications to ensure consistent testing environments.
• Intrusion Detection and Prevention Systems (IDPS):
o Snort: For real-time traffic analysis and packet logging.
o Suricata: An IDS/IPS engine for network monitoring.
• Encryption Tools:
o OpenSSL: For implementing SSL/TLS encryption.
o VeraCrypt: For disk encryption.
• Authentication and Access Control:
o Okta or Auth0: For implementing secure authentication and authorization.

6. Training and Awareness

• Learning Management Systems (LMS):

o Moodle: For creating and managing cybersecurity training programs.
o Coursera for Business: For providing access to professional cybersecurity courses.
• Simulation Tools:
o Cyberbit: For running cybersecurity simulations and training exercises.
o PhishMe: For conducting phishing simulation and training.

Summary

The software requirements for this project encompass a range of tools and systems
across data collection, analysis, vulnerability assessment, strategy development, and
implementation/testing. By leveraging these tools, the project team can effectively
analyze cyber crime trends, identify vulnerabilities, develop comprehensive mitigation
strategies, and ensure robust cybersecurity measures are in place.

DASHBOARD CREATION:
LINK:

4|Page
5|Page

https://us1.ca.analytics.ibm.com/bi/?perspective=dashboard&pathRef=.my_folders%2FNew%
2Bdashboard&action=view&mode=dashboard&subView=model0000018fa3c3be43_00000002

5|Page
6|Page

DASHBOARD SCREENSHOTS & ANALYSIS:

TAB1:

TOTAL:
• City D & N Haveli and Jabalpur have the lowest total Total at 0.0
• City Total All India has the highest total Total at over 99 thousand, followed by Total State(s) at
over 98 thousand.
• The overall number of results for Total is 190.

STEAL INFO FOR CITY REGIONS:

• Steal Information is unusually high in Jharkhand, TOTAL STATE(S), TOTAL ALL INDIA, Total All India
and Total State(s).
• City Jharkhand has the highest Total Steal Information but is ranked #13 in Total Total.
• City Total All India has the highest Total Total but is ranked #4 in Total Steal Information.
• Steal Information ranges from 0, in Aurangabad, to 132, in Jharkhand.
• Over all cities, the sum of Steal Information is 543.

6|Page
7|Page

SPREADING PIRACY:
• City A & N Islands and A&N Islands have the lowest total Spreading Piracy at 0.0.
• City Total All India has the highest total Spreading Piracy at 836.0, followed by Total State(s) at
832.0.
• The overall number of results for Spreading Piracy is 190.

PERSONAL REVENGE BY CITY:

• City Total All India has the highest values of both Personal Revenge and Total.
• Personal Revenge is unusually high in Total All India, Total State(s), Assam, TOTAL ALL INDIA and
TOTAL STATE(S).
• Personal Revenge ranges from 0, in A & N Islands, to nearly three thousand, in Total All India.
• For Personal Revenge, the most significant values of City are Total All India and Total State(s),
whose respective Personal Revenge values add up to nearly six thousand, or 46.6 % of the total.
• Across all cities, the sum of Personal Revenge is over twelve thousand

TAB 2:

CAUSING DISREPUTE:

• City A & N Islands and Agra have the lowest total Causing Disrepute at 0.0.
• City Total All India has the highest total Causing Disrepute at 3920.0, followed by Total State(s) at
3880.0.
• The overall number of results for Causing Disrepute is 190.

7|Page
8|Page

CITY HIERARCHY COLORED BY ANGER AND SIZED BY EXTORTION:

• City Total All India has the highest values of both Extortion and Anger.
• City Total All India has the highest values of both Anger and Total.
• Total All India Extortion at nearly 4500 is 55% higher than the Anger of nearly 2 thousand.
• Extortion and Anger diverged the most when City is Total All India, and when Extortion was almost
2500 higher than the Anger.
• Extortion ranges from 0, in Faridabad, to nearly 4500, in Total All India.
• For Extortion, the most significant values of City are Total All India and Total State(s), whose
respective Extortion values add up to over 8500, or 46.5 % of the total.
• Over all cities, the sum of Extortion is nearly nineteen thousand.

ABETMENT TO SUICIDE:
• City A & N Islands and A&N Islands have the lowest total Abetment to Suicide at 0.0.
• City Total All India and Total State(s) have the highest total Abetment to Suicide at 7.0.
• The overall number of results for Abetment to Suicide is 190.

TAB 3:

8|Page
9|Page

CEI BY REGION ( THE Cybersecurity exposure Index):

• Europe GCI at 3,814 is 100% higher than the CEI of 13.47.
• CEI is most unusual in Asia-Pasific and North America.
• Region Europe has the highest Total GCI but is ranked #2 in Total CEI.
• Region Asia-Pasific has the highest Total CEI but is ranked #2 in Total GCI.
• CEI ranges from 4.159, in North America, to 17.28, in Asia-Pasific.
• For CEI, the most significant values of Region are Asia-Pasific, Europe, and Africa, whose
respective CEI values add up to 41.84, or 82.1 % of the total.
• Over all regions, the sum of CEI is 50.96.

NCSI:
• Region South America has the lowest total NCSI at 531.19, followed by North America at 706.52.
• Region Europe has the highest total NCSI at over 3 thousand, followed by Asia-Pasific at over
1500.
• The overall number of results for NCSI is 167.

GCI AND NCSI by Region:

• Region Europe has the highest values of both GCI and DDL.
• Region Europe has the highest values of both NCSI and GCI.
• Europe GCI at nearly four thousand is 23% higher than the DDL of nearly three thousand.
• Europe GCI at nearly four thousand is 15% higher than the NCSI of over three thousand.
• GCI and DDL diverged the most when Region is Europe, and when GCI was 873.4 higher than the
DDL.

9|Page
10 | P a g e

• GCI is unusually high in Europe.

• Asia-Pasific (28.9 %), Africa (27.9 %), and Europe (24.7 %) are the most frequently occurring
categories of Region with a combined count of 155 items with GCI values (81.6 % of the total).
• Europe (28.1 %), Asia-Pasific (28.1 %), Africa (22.8 %), and North America (14.4 %) are the most
frequently occurring categories of Region with a combined count of 156 items with NCSI values
(93.4 % of the total).
• Over all regions, the average of GCI is 52.77.
• Over all regions, the average of NCSI is 43.31.
• The total number of results for GCI, across all regions, is 190.
• The total number of results for NCSI, across all regions, is 167.
• GCI ranges from 568.9, in South America, to nearly four thousand, in Europe.
• NCSI ranges from 531.2, in South America, to over three thousand, in Europe.

TAB 4:

10 | P a g e
11 | P a g e

GCI by Region with points for Region:

• Region Europe has the highest values of both GCI and NCSI.
• Europe GCI at nearly four thousand is 15% higher than the NCSI of over three thousand.
• The overall number of results for GCI is 5.
• The overall number of results for Region is 5.

GCI:
• Region South America has the lowest total GCI at 568.93, followed by North America at 786.64.
• Region Europe has the highest total GCI at nearly four thousand, followed by Asia-Pasific at nearly
three thousand.
• The overall number of results for GCI is 190.

CEI BY Region:
• Europe GCI at 3,814 is 100% higher than the CEI of 13.47.
• CEI is most unusual in Asia-Pasific and North America.
• Region Europe has the highest Total GCI but is ranked #2 in Total CEI.
• Region Asia-Pasific has the highest Total CEI but is ranked #2 in Total GCI.
• CEI ranges from 4.159, in North America, to 17.28, in Asia-Pasific.
• For CEI, the most significant values of Region are Asia-Pasific, Europe, and Africa, whose
respective CEI values add up to 41.84, or 82.1 % of the total.
• Over all regions, the sum of CEI is 50.96.

TAB 5:

11 | P a g e
12 | P a g e

State/UT by state /ST:

• The total number of results for State/UT, across all State/UT, is 39

2016 by State/UT:

• 2016 is unusually high when State/UT is Total (All India) and Total State(s).
• State/UT Total (All India) has the highest Total 2016 but is ranked #11 in Total Rate of Total Cyber
Crimes (2018)++.
• State/UT Karnataka has the highest Total Rate of Total Cyber Crimes (2018)++ but is ranked #5 in
Total 2016.
• 2016 ranges from 0, when State/UT is Lakshadweep, to over 12 thousand, when State/UT is Total
(All India).
• For 2016, the most significant values of State/UT are Total (All India) and Total State(s), whose
respective 2016 values add up to almost 25 thousand, or 66.3 % of the total.
• Over all values of State/UT, the sum of 2016 is nearly 37 thousand.

Percentage share of state /UT (2018) by State/UT:

• State/UT Total (All India) has the highest Average Percentage Share of State/UT (2018) but is
ranked #11 in Total Rate of Total Cyber Crimes (2018)++.
• State/UT Karnataka has the highest Total Rate of Total Cyber Crimes (2018)++ but is ranked #4 in
Average Percentage Share of State/UT (2018).
• State/UT strongly affects Percentage Share of State/UT (2018) (100%).
• Over all values of State/UT, the average of Percentage Share of State/UT (2018) is 7.69.

12 | P a g e
13 | P a g e

• The average values of Percentage Share of State/UT (2018) range from 0, occurring when State/UT
is A & N Islands, to 100, when State/UT is Total (All India).

2016 for State/UT regions:

• 2016 is unusually high when State/UT is Total (All India) and Total State(s).
• State/UT Total (All India) has the highest Total 2016 but is ranked #11 in Total Rate of Total
Cyber Crimes (2018)++.
• State/UT Karnataka has the highest Total Rate of Total Cyber Crimes (2018)++ but is ranked
#5 in Total 2016.
• 2016 ranges from 0, when State/UT is Lakshadweep, to over 12 thousand, when State/UT is
Total (All India).
• For 2016, the most significant values of State/UT are Total (All India) and Total State(s), whose
respective 2016 values add up to almost 25 thousand, or 66.3 % of the total.
• Over all values of State/UT, the sum of 2016 is nearly 37 thousand.

CONCLUSION:

This project provides a comprehensive framework for understanding and mitigating cyber
crime, addressing the dynamic and evolving threat landscape faced by organizations today.
Through systematic data collection, rigorous analysis, and strategic implementation, the
project aims to enhance cybersecurity measures significantly. Key elements of the project
include:

1. Data Collection and Trend Analysis: Gathering extensive data from various sources
to analyze current cyber crime trends. Utilizing advanced statistical and machine
learning tools to identify patterns and predict future threats.
2. Vulnerability Assessment: Conducting thorough evaluations of systems, networks,
and human factors to identify and address vulnerabilities. Employing penetration
testing and vulnerability scanning tools to ensure robust security postures.
3. Strategy Development and Implementation: Formulating comprehensive
cybersecurity policies, technical solutions, and training programs. Implementing these
strategies within controlled environments to test their effectiveness and make
necessary adjustments based on feedback and emerging threats.
4. Ongoing Monitoring and Improvement: Continuously monitoring the cybersecurity
landscape and updating defense mechanisms to stay ahead of potential threats.
Establishing a continuous improvement framework to adapt to new challenges.

By leveraging a suite of software tools for data collection, analysis, vulnerability assessment,
strategy development, and implementation/testing, the project aims to provide organizations
with the necessary resources to proactively defend against cyber threats. The outcomes of
this project include detailed reports on cyber crime trends, vulnerability assessments, a
toolkit of best practices, and tested security solutions.

In conclusion, the project equips organizations with the knowledge and tools required to
enhance their cybersecurity measures, ensuring a resilient defense against the ever-changing
landscape of cyber threats. Through continuous monitoring, adaptation, and improvement,

13 | P a g e
14 | P a g e

organizations can maintain a strong cybersecurity posture, protecting their digital assets and
maintaining operational integrity

14 | P a g e