DESIGN ANALYSIS OF A PROPOSED THREE STOREY COMMERCIAL

BUILDING

A Research Paper Presented to the Faculty of Civil Engineering

College of Engineering, Nueva Vizcaya State University
Bayombong, Nueva Vizcaya

In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree

Bachelor of Science in Civil Engineering Major in Structural
Engineering

Acosta, Mike Melvin N.

Mariano, Eajay J.
Orario, Nicolas P.
Pampo, John Mark G.

MAY 2024
NVSU RDD NO. 03
ACCEPTANCE SHEET

This Study entitled “Design Analysis of a Proposed Three Storey Commercial

Building”, prepared and submitted by MIKE MELVIN N. ACOSTA, EAJAY J.

MARIANO, NICOLAS P. ORARIO and JOHN MARK G. PAMPO in partial fulfillment

of the requirements for the degree of Bachelor of Science in Civil Engineering has been

examined and recommended for approval.

ENGR. JYRUS JYLES CADIENTE ENGR. EDWIN B. BARAL

Adviser Research Critic

Date Signed Date Signed

ENGR. KRICHELLE MAUREEN C. GAERLAN

Research Critic

Date Signed

ENGR. ELVIRA A. UCOL

Chair, Department of Civil Engineering

Date Signed

Accepted as partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of

BACHELOR OF SCIENCE IN CIVIL ENGINEERING.

ADORNADO C. VERGARA, Ph.D

Dean, College of Engineering

Date Signed

R & D Index Contribution No: RAMON P. BANGAO JR.

Date: Research MIS Coordinator

ii
 Republic of the Philippines
NUEVA VIZCAYA STATE UNIVERSITY
Bayombong, Nueva Vizcaya

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

To everyone who helped us finish this thesis, we sincerely thank you for your

contributions. First and foremost, we would like to sincerely thank Engr. Jyrus Jyles

Cadiente for serving as our thesis advisor. Thank you, for all of your support,

encouragement, and invaluable advice along this journey.

Their knowledge, tolerance, and helpful criticism have been invaluable in helping

to shape this work. We also thank the Engineering faculty members for their insightful

advice and helpful suggestions throughout our research. Their experience has improved

our knowledge of the topic.

In addition, we thank our families for their unwavering support, love, and

understanding. We were able to overcome obstacles and pursue our academic objectives

because of their steadfast support. Finally, we thank the All-Powerful God for His

direction and favor during this undertaking, which have been crucial to its success.

Finally, we would like to thank everyone that helped us finish this thesis, no

matter how small or large the contribution. We sincerely appreciate your support, and

your contributions have been invaluable.

The Researchers

iii
 Republic of the Philippines
NUEVA VIZCAYA STATE UNIVERSITY
Bayombong, Nueva Vizcaya

DEDICATION

This work is dedicated to our parents, whose unwavering support, sacrifices, and

limitless love have been our beacons of hope as we navigate the challenges of higher

education. Your unwavering encouragement and persistent faith in our abilities have

driven us to strive for perfection. This thesis serves as evidence of your steadfast

dedication to our accomplishment.

Our sincere gratitude to Nueva Vizcaya State University (NVSU), our alma

mater, for giving us the opportunity to explore, learn, and develop is expressed here. Our

passion for knowledge has been nourished and our intellectual pursuits shaped by the

academic environment, resources, and mentorship offered by NVSU. The transformative

power of our education at NVSU is reflected in this thesis.

Finally, we dedicate this work to the All-Powerful God, whose blessings, grace,

and direction have lit our way and helped us overcome every obstacle. He has been our

unwavering inspiration and source of strength in His boundless wisdom, leading us to the

accomplishment of this project. This thesis is meant to be a modest homage to His

steadfast presence in our lives.

The Researchers

iv
 Republic of the Philippines
NUEVA VIZCAYA STATE UNIVERSITY
Bayombong, Nueva Vizcaya

ABSTRACT

This study focuses on the comprehensive design analysis of a proposed three-

storey commercial building, incorporating architectural, structural, and environmental

considerations. The primary objective is to create a sustainable and functional

commercial space that meets modern standards and codes.

The architectural design emphasizes an aesthetic yet practical layout, ensuring

optimal space utilization. Various design alternatives are evaluated to determine the most

efficient configuration that maximizes rentable area without compromising on comfort

and accessibility. The structural analysis involves detailed calculations and simulations to

ensure the building's stability, safety, and durability under various load conditions.

Advanced materials and construction techniques are considered to enhance the building's

performance and lifespan. Compliance with local building codes and environmental

regulations is meticulously ensured throughout the design process.

In conclusion, the design analysis of the proposed three-storey commercial

building demonstrates a balanced approach to aesthetic appeal and structural integrity.

The study provides a robust framework for developing commercial spaces that are not

only functional and safe but also sustainable and community friendly. By integrating

innovative design strategies and sustainable practices, the project aims to set a new

standard for future commercial developments.

v
 Republic of the Philippines
NUEVA VIZCAYA STATE UNIVERSITY
Bayombong, Nueva Vizcaya

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Title Page………………………………………………………………………………i

Acceptance Sheet……………………………………………………………………...ii

Acknowledgement ....................................................................................................... .iii

Dedication.................................................................................................................... .iv

Abstract........................................................................................................................ ..v

Table of Contents......................................................................................................... vii

CHAPTER I. INTRODUCTION

Rationale ................................................................................................................. 1

Objectives of the Study ........................................................................................... 2

Significance of the Study ........................................................................................ 2

Scope and Delimitation ........................................................................................... 2

Definition of terms .................................................................................................. 3

CHAPTER II. METHODOLOGY

Research Design.................................................................................................... ..4

Research Environment .......................................................................................... ..4

Research Instrument.............................................................................................. ..5

CHAPTER III. RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS

Preliminary Analysis............................................................................................. ..6

Concrete Design .................................................................................................... ..9

CHAPTER IV. CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS

vi
 Conclusion ............................................................................................................ 11

Recommendations ................................................................................................. 11

APPENDICES ............................................................................................................ 12

Appendix A ........................................................................................................... 13

Appendix B ........................................................................................................... 30

Appendix C ........................................................................................................... 45

Curriculum Vitae .................................................................................................. 46

vii
 CHAPTER I

INTRODUCTION

Rationale

This study focuses on the design concept of a three-storey commercial building

that combines rental stalls, a restaurant, café, office spaces, and apartments, catering to

the diverse needs of occupants and visitors alike.

The first floor is dedicated to a cozy cafe and a delightful restaurant, providing

perfect spots for people to relax, enjoy a cup of coffee, or have a meal. Additionally, this

floor hosts a vibrant marketplace where visitors can shop for a wide range of goods,

making it a lively and bustling area.

The second floor is exclusively for modern offices. These office spaces are

designed to be functional and comfortable, catering to professionals who need a

productive work environment. The placement of offices on the second floor offers a quiet

and focused area for businesses to thrive.

The third floor houses comfortable room apartments. These apartments are ideal

for people who want to live close to where they work. The convenience of having living

spaces within the same building creates a dynamic and integrated community.

In summary, this three-storey building combines dining, shopping, working, and

living in one place. It is a multi-functional space that meets various needs, providing

convenience and fostering a vibrant community atmosphere. This thesis will use certain

applications like autocad and staad, helping in designing a three-storey commercial

building for better functionality and sustainability.

1
Objectives of the Study

The primary aim of this project is to create a complete plan and design a three-

storey commercial building.

Significance of the Study

Students studying civil engineering will have the chance to put their knowledge

and abilities to use by creating a three-storey commercial building that puts aesthetics and

functionality. Adherence to construction codes and regulations guarantees the well-being

and safety of building occupants.

Scope and Delimitation

The goal of this project is to present a thorough design proposal, with an emphasis

on the architectural and structural aspects.

The scope of this project includes:

1) Detailed architectural design: Creating a complete plan with the help of AutoCad.

2) Design Analysis: Staad Pro will analyze the plan and provide the number of rebars in

beams and columns.

The limitations of this project are as follows:

1) Exclusion of actual construction: The two-storey commercial building will not be

physically constructed as part of this project.

2) Analysis of unit prices: This will entail gathering and analyzing cost information for
labor, building supplies, and other project-related resources.

2
Definition of Terms
• Commercial Building: A structure designed and constructed for commercial

purposes, such as retail, dining, office spaces, or other business activities.

• Rental Stalls: Individual spaces within a commercial building that are leased or

rented out to vendors or businesses for the purpose of selling goods or providing

services.

• Restaurant: An establishment where meals are prepared and served to customers

in exchange for payment. Restaurants may offer a variety of cuisines and dining

experiences, ranging from casual to fine dining.

• Café: A small restaurant or coffeehouse that typically serves beverages such as

coffee, tea, and light snacks. Cafés often provide a relaxed and informal

atmosphere for patrons to socialize or work.

• Office Spaces: Areas within a commercial building that are designated for

professional work activities, such as administrative tasks, meetings, and

collaboration among employees or tenants.

• Sustainability: The practice of designing, constructing, and operating buildings

in a way that reduces negative environmental impacts, conserves resources, and

promotes long-term ecological balance.

3
 CHAPTER II

METHODOLOGY

Research Design

Development of
the Conceptual Analysis and
Design of Design of the 3D Drawing of
Architectural structure in the building
and Structural STAAD using Sketchup
Layout using
AutoCad

Figure 1. Flowchart of the study

The figure presents a clear and comprehensive plan for carrying out the project's

procedure through visual representation. This plan includes a detailed description of the

methods and procedures that will be used during this study.

Research Environment

This study will be conducted at Nueva Vizcaya State University while the

location of the building will be located at San Antonio North, Bambang, Nueva Vizcaya.

Figure 2 will show the location of the building.

4
 Figure 2. Location of the Building

Research Instrument

To create and complete the proposed plans, the following software and

applications will be utilized:

1. AutoCAD – This application will be used by researchers for the preparation of

the plans, layouts, and design.

2. SketchUp – It is a computer program to be used in creating 3d illustration for a

more vivid view of the proposed project.

3. Microsoft Word and Microsoft Excel – This application will be used by the

researchers to encode information to be presented and enables the researchers to

compute for data needed in the study.

4. STAAD – is a popular structural analysis application known for analysis, diverse

applications of use, interoperability, and time-saving capabilities. STAAD will be

5
 a great help to the researchers to perform 3D structural analysis and design for

both steel and concrete structures.

Development of the Conceptual Design of Architectural and Structural Layout in

AutoCAD

This includes conceptualizing the three-storey commercial building layout,

materials, and construction methods with the utilization of computer applications

primarily AutoCAD and SketchUp.

Analysis and Design of the structure in STAAD

This includes the utilization of computer application primarily STAAD for the

structural designs of the proposed building. This will enable the development,

modification, and optimization of the design process. The outcome is to present accurate

and realistic representations of the project.

Load Computations for Staad

This includes the use of Microsoft Excel and the manual computation of the loads

used in designing the three-storey commercial building.

6
 CHAPTER III

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

The following results are produced by an application named Staad pro. These

results are produced to see if the three-storey commercial building fail or not.

PRELIMINARY ANALYSIS

- Soft Storey Check = OK!!! - NO SOFT STOREY IS DETECTED.

- Torsion Irregularity Check = OK!!

- Re - Entrant Corner Check = OK!!

- Mass Irregularity Check = FAIL!!

7
- Drift Check = PASS!!

8
9
 CONCRETE DESIGN

- The following parameters will be used in designing the building

⚫ CLB = 0.04

⚫ CLS = 0.04

⚫ CLT = 0.04

⚫ FC = 24131.7 (3500Psi)

⚫ FYMAIN = 275790 (Gr40)

⚫ FYSEC = 275790 (Gr40)

⚫ MAXMAIN = 20

⚫ MINMAIN = 16

⚫ MINSEC = 10

- The following results are:

1. First floor beams and columns have no fail, no suitable, no proper, no exceed

and no torsion value means all are passed.

2. Second floor beams and columns have no fail, no suitable, no proper, no exceed

and no torsion value means all are passed.

3. Third floor beams and columns have no fail, no suitable, no proper, no exceed

and no torsion value means all are passed.

4. Roof beams have no fail, no suitable, no proper, no exceed and no torsion value

means all are passed.

At this point the structure is safe against soft storey, irregularities, drift and all

column/beams are passed.

10
 CHAPTER IV

CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Conclusion

The structure and its components are assumed to possess designed strengths

matching the required strengths for the various combinations of loads, including lateral

forces, with adequate safety margins. This ensures the building's capability to withstand

the highest possible earthquake magnitude and other loads. Moreover, the building has

complied with all the requirements of the applicable building codes and laws. As a result,

it will be an essential facility.

Recommendation

We recommend to the future researchers that will continue this proposal shall

make more simplified and detailed plans, estimation, electrical and plumbing utilities and

improved load combinations for longer stability and for future uses.

11
APPENDICES

12
APPENDIX A

13
 DESIGN CONCEPT:
MJEN
MJEN COMMERCIAL BUILDING

A proposed 3-storey commercial building, start with a strong architectural concept that reflects the
purpose and character of the development. Consider incorporating versatile spaces that can
accommodate a variety of businesses, from retail shops to offices or even restaurants. Maximizing
natural light with large windows and atriums can create an inviting atmosphere while reducing
energy consumption. Flexibility in design, such as modular layouts or adaptable partitions, allows
for future changes in tenant needs. Integration of modern technology for security, energy
management, and communication enhances functionality and efficiency. Lastly, prioritize
sustainability by incorporating green building practices, such as renewable energy sources and
A B C D E F G H I
.
water conservation measures, to minimize environmental impact and attract eco-conscious
. . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . 3.
3.
.
3.
3. .
3.
3. .
3.
3. . . . . . 3.
tenants.
UP UP UP UP
.
.

.
HCG

HCG

HCG

HCG

COMFORT ROOM COMFORT ROOM

.

GUARD ITCHEN AND

ITCHEN AND
PREPARATOR ROOM HOUSE UTILIT PREPARATOR ROOM
MALE FEMALE FEMALE MALE
3.

3.

ROOM
.

UP UP
.

STALL STALL STALL 3 STALL

. SER ICE AREA SER ICE AREA .
3. 3
3.

DO N DO N
ROLL-UP DOOR ROLL-UP DOOR ROLL-UP DOOR ROLL-UP DOOR
UP UP
.
3.
.
.

UP
.

3.

3.
UP
.

3
3.

3.
3.

.
.

A A A
.

3.
. . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . 3.
.
GROUND FLOOR PLAN
A B C D E F G H I
.
. . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . 3.
.3

BALCON BALCON BALCON BALCON

TERRACE TERRACE
OFFICE
3.

OFFICE OFFICE OFFICE OFFICE OFFICE

.
.

AITING AITING
AREA AREA
OFFICE
3.
3.

H A L L W A H A L L W A OFFICE
3.

Y Y
OFFICE
.
.

OFFICE
3.

3
3.

3.
3.

. 3. . . . . . . . . 3. .
.
SECOND FLOOR PLAN
A B C D E F G H I
.
. . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . 3.
.3

BALCON BALCON BALCON BALCON

TERRACE TERRACE
OFFICE

3.
OFFICE OFFICE OFFICE OFFICE OFFICE
.
.

AITING AITING
AREA AREA
OFFICE

3.
3.

.
H A L L W A H A L L W A OFFICE

3.
Y Y
OFFICE
.
.

OFFICE

3.
3
3.

3.
3.

. 3. . . . . . . . . 3. .
.
THIRD FLOOR PLAN
PERSPECTIVE VIEW A-1
 A B C D E F G H I J K L M
46.00
5.00 3.00 1.00 4.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 4.00 1.00 3.00 5.00
5.00 1.00 1.50 1.50 4.00 1.50 3.50 1.50 3.50 1.50 3.50 1.50 3.50 4.00 1.50 1.50 1.00 5.00 3.00
3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
1.18

UP UP UP UP
1.33
1.50

1.50
1.35

HCG

HCG

HCG

HCG
1
COMFORT ROOM COMFORT ROOM
2.42

GUARD KITCHEN AND

KITCHEN AND
3.00

3.00
PREPARATORY ROOM HOUSE UTILITY PREPARATORY ROOM
MALE FEMALE FEMALE MALE
ROOM
2
0.96
7.00

7.00
UP UP
STALL 1 STALL 2 STALL 3 STALL 4
1.10 SERVICE AREA SERVICE AREA 1.10
3.63

DOWN DOWN

17.50
3 UP
ROLL-UP DOOR ROLL-UP DOOR ROLL-UP DOOR ROLL-UP DOOR
UP
16.00

3.00

3.00
6.00

4
UP

2.60
3.00

3.00
0.90
3.70
UP
5
3.00

3.00
3.20

4.90
0.50

5.00
A A A
3.70
2.70 2.70 2.70 2.70 2.70 2.70 2.70 2.70
5.00 4.00 4.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 4.00 4.00 5.00 3.00
49.00
1 GROUND FLOOR PLAN
SCALE: 1:160
A2
SCHOOL: STUDENT: PROJECT TITLE: INSTRUCTOR: SHEET CONTENT: SHEET NO.
NUEVA VIZCAYA STATE UNIVERSITY ORARIO, NICOLAS P.
MARIANO, EAJAY J. DESIGN ANALYSIS OF A PROPOSED ENGR. JYRUS JYLES D. CADIENTE GROUND FLOOR PLAN
COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING
PAMPO, JOHN MARK G. 3-STOREY COMMERCIAL BUILDING A-2
BAYOMBONG, NUEVA VIZCAYA ACOSTA, MIKE MELVIN N. SUBJECT NAME: CE PROJECT 2 SCALE: 1:160
 A B C D E F G H I J K L M
46.00
5.00 3.00 1.00 4.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 4.00 1.00 3.00 5.00
5.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.45 3.55
1.38

BALCONY BALCONY BALCONY BALCONY

1
2.42

TERRACE TERRACE

3.50
OFFICE
2
7.00

OFFICE OFFICE OFFICE OFFICE OFFICE

4.58

WAITING WAITING

3.50
AREA AREA
OFFICE
3
16.00

16.00
3.00

3.00
H A L L W A Y H A L L W A Y OFFICE
6.00

4 OFFICE
3.00

3.00
OFFICE
5
3.00

3.00
3.20

6
5.00 3.00 1.00 4.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 4.00 1.00 3.00 5.00
46.00
1 SECOND FLOOR PLAN
SCALE: 1:160
A3
SCHOOL: STUDENT: PROJECT TITLE: INSTRUCTOR: SHEET CONTENT: SHEET NO.
NUEVA VIZCAYA STATE UNIVERSITY ORARIO, NICOLAS P.
MARIANO, EAJAY J. DESIGN ANALYSIS OF A PROPOSED ENGR. JYRUS JYLES D. CADIENTE SECOND FLOOR PLAN
COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING
PAMPO, JOHN MARK G. 3-STOREY COMMERCIAL BUILDING A-3
BAYOMBONG, NUEVA VIZCAYA ACOSTA, MIKE MELVIN N. SUBJECT NAME: CE PROJECT 2 SCALE: 1:160
 A B C D E F G H I J K L M
46.00
5.00 3.00 1.00 4.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 4.00 1.00 3.00 5.00
5.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.45 3.55
BALCONY BALCONY BALCONY BALCONY
1
2.42

LAUNDRY LAUNDRY
WATER TANK ROOM ROOM ROOM ROOM WATER TANK
ROOM AND AND ROOM

3.50
DRYING AREA 105 106 107 108 DRYING AREA
104 112
2
7.00
4.58

ROOM ROOM

3.50
103 111
3
16.00

16.00
3.00

3.00
ROOM ROOM
102 H A L L W A Y H A L L W A Y 110
6.00

4
3.00

3.00
ROOM ROOM
101 109
5
3.00

3.00
3.15

6
5.00 3.00 1.00 4.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 4.00 1.00 3.00 5.00
46.00
1 THIRD FLOOR PLAN
SCALE: 1:160
A4
SCHOOL: STUDENT: PROJECT TITLE: INSTRUCTOR: SHEET CONTENT: SHEET NO.
NUEVA VIZCAYA STATE UNIVERSITY ORARIO, NICOLAS P.
MARIANO, EAJAY J. DESIGN ANALYSIS OF A PROPOSED ENGR. JYRUS JYLES D. CADIENTE THIRD FLOOR PLAN
COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING
PAMPO, JOHN MARK G. 3-STOREY COMMERCIAL BUILDING A-4
BAYOMBONG, NUEVA VIZCAYA ACOSTA, MIKE MELVIN N. SUBJECT NAME: CE PROJECT 2 SCALE: 1:160
 A B C D E F G H I J K L M
1.78

TOP OF THE BEAM

3.20

THIRD FLOOR LEVEL

12.58
3.60

SECOND FLOOR LEVEL

3.60

FIRST FLOOR LEVEL

0.40

1 FRONT ELEVATION
SCALE: 1:160
A5
M L K J I H G F E D C B A
1.78

TOP OF THE BEAM

3.20

THIRD FLOOR LEVEL

12.58
3.60

SECOND FLOOR LEVEL

3.60

FIRST FLOOR LEVEL

0.40

2 REAR ELEVATION
SCALE: 1:160
A5
SCHOOL: STUDENT: PROJECT TITLE: INSTRUCTOR: SHEET CONTENT: SHEET NO.
NUEVA VIZCAYA STATE UNIVERSITY ORARIO, NICOLAS P.
MARIANO, EAJAY J. DESIGN ANALYSIS OF A PROPOSED ENGR. JYRUS JYLES D. CADIENTE
FRONT ELEVATION
COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING
PAMPO, JOHN MARK G. 3-STOREY COMMERCIAL BUILDING
REAR ELEVATION
A-5
BAYOMBONG, NUEVA VIZCAYA ACOSTA, MIKE MELVIN N. SUBJECT NAME: CE PROJECT 2 SCALE: 1:160
 1 2 3 4 5 6 6 5 4 3 2 1
0.47

0.47
21.35 21.35

0.40
0.40

1.31

1.31
TOP OF THE BEAM TOP OF THE BEAM
3.20

3.20

3.20

3.20
THIRD FLOOR LEVEL THIRD FLOOR LEVEL
12.58

12.58
3.60

3.60

3.60

3.60
SECOND FLOOR LEVEL SECOND FLOOR LEVEL
3.60

3.60
4.00

4.00
FIRST FLOOR LEVEL FIRST FLOOR LEVEL

0.40

0.40
1 LEFT SIDE ELEVATION 2 RIGHT SIDE ELEVATION
SCALE: 1:160 SCALE: 1:160
A6 A6
SCHOOL: STUDENT: PROJECT TITLE: INSTRUCTOR: SHEET CONTENT: SHEET NO.
NUEVA VIZCAYA STATE UNIVERSITY ORARIO, NICOLAS P.
MARIANO, EAJAY J. DESIGN ANALYSIS OF A PROPOSED ENGR. JYRUS JYLES D. CADIENTE
LEFT SIDE ELEVATION
COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING
PAMPO, JOHN MARK G. 3-STOREY COMMERCIAL BUILDING
RIGHT SIDE ELEVATION
A-6
BAYOMBONG, NUEVA VIZCAYA ACOSTA, MIKE MELVIN N. SUBJECT NAME: CE PROJECT 2 SCALE: 1:160
 48.80
13.30 22.20 13.30
2.17

LONG SPAN
TWIN RIB ROOFING
21.32
19.15

DOWN
6.00

6.00
DOWN DOWN
11.35 26.10 11.35
48.80
1 ROOF PLAN
SCALE: 1:160
A7
SCHOOL: STUDENT: PROJECT TITLE: INSTRUCTOR: SHEET CONTENT: SHEET NO.
NUEVA VIZCAYA STATE UNIVERSITY ORARIO, NICOLAS P.
MARIANO, EAJAY J. DESIGN ANALYSIS OF A PROPOSED ENGR. JYRUS JYLES D. CADIENTE ROOF PLAN
COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING
PAMPO, JOHN MARK G. 3-STOREY COMMERCIAL BUILDING A-7
BAYOMBONG, NUEVA VIZCAYA ACOSTA, MIKE MELVIN N. SUBJECT NAME: CE PROJECT 2 SCALE: 1:160
 D E
4.00
2.00 2.00 TOP OF THE BEAM
2

3.20
1.82

25
10 10

1.00
11 11
9 12 9 12
4.59

8 13 8 13
7 14 7 14
THIRD FLOOR LEVEL
6 15 6 15
5 16 5 16
4 17 4 17
3 18 3 18
2 19 2 19

3.60
LANDING=
1 20 1 20 150mm THK LANDING BEAM
3 UP DOWN
1.80 1.80

1.00
SECOND FLOOR LEVEL
PLAN

3.60
LANDING= LANDING BEAM
150mm THK
GUARD HOUSE

1.18
20
19
18
1.98 16
17
FIRST FLOOR LEVEL
0.15

15
14
13

0.40
12
3.60

3.60

11
10
LANDING= 0.15m LANDING= 0.15m THICK
9
8
7
0.28

1.80
0.18

1.65
6
5
4
3
2 RISER= 0.18m
1
RUN=0.28m
2 TYPICAL STAIR ELEVATION
2.57 0.28 A8 SCALE: 1:160
LEFT SIDE VIEW RIGHT SIDE VIEW
1 STAIR DETAILS
SCALE: 1:80
A8
SCHOOL: STUDENT: PROJECT TITLE: INSTRUCTOR: SHEET CONTENT: SHEET NO.
NUEVA VIZCAYA STATE UNIVERSITY ORARIO, NICOLAS P.
MARIANO, EAJAY J. DESIGN ANALYSIS OF A PROPOSED ENGR. JYRUS JYLES D. CADIENTE
STAIR DETAILS
COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING
PAMPO, JOHN MARK G. 3-STOREY COMMERCIAL BUILDING
TYPICAL STAIR ELEVATION
A-8
BAYOMBONG, NUEVA VIZCAYA ACOSTA, MIKE MELVIN N. SUBJECT NAME: CE PROJECT 2 SCALE: AS SHOWN
 A B C D E F G H I J K L M
46.00
5.00 3.00 1.00 4.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 4.00 1.00 3.00 5.00
TB TB TB TB
1.58

1 TB TB TB TB TB TB TB TB TB TB
2.42

2.42
C1-F1 C1-F1 C1-F1 C1-F1 C1-F1 C1-F1 C1-F1 C1-F1 C1-F1 C1-F1 C1-F1
2 TB TB
TB TB C2-F3 C2-F3 TB TB TB C2-F3 C2-F3 TB TB
SLAB ON GRADE: 100mm THK +
4.59

4.59
TB TB FINISH WITH 10mm DIA. BARS TB TB
SPACED @300 EACHWAY
3 TB TB TB TB TB TB TB TB TB TB
16.00

16.00
3.00

3.00
C1-F1 C1-F1 C1-F1 C1-F1 C1-F1 C1-F1 C1-F1 C1-F1 C1-F1 C1-F1 C1-F1
4 TB TB
TB TB TB TB TB TB
TB TB
TB
3.00

3.00
C2-F2 C2-F2 C2-F2 C2-F2 C2-F2 C2-F2 C2-F2
5 TB TB
3.00

3.00
C1-F1 C1-F1 C2-F2 C2-F2 C1-F1 C1-F1
TB
6 TB TB TB TB
C2-F2 C2-F2 C2-F2 C2-F2 C2-F2 C2-F2
5.00 3.00 1.00 4.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 4.00 1.00 3.00 5.00
46.00
1 FOUNDATION PLAN
SCALE: 1:160
S1
SCHOOL: STUDENT: PROJECT TITLE: INSTRUCTOR: SHEET CONTENT: SHEET NO.
NUEVA VIZCAYA STATE UNIVERSITY ORARIO, NICOLAS P.
MARIANO, EAJAY J. DESIGN ANALYSIS OF A PROPOSED ENGR. JYRUS JYLES D. CADIENTE FOUNDATION PLAN
COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING
PAMPO, JOHN MARK G. 3-STOREY COMMERCIAL BUILDING S-1
BAYOMBONG, NUEVA VIZCAYA ACOSTA, MIKE MELVIN N. SUBJECT NAME: CE PROJECT 1 SCALE: 1:160
 550
550 550
500

500
550

400

400

400

400
500 500
550

550
BELOW FIRST BELOW THIRD ABOVE THIRD 400 400 400 400
FLOOR LINE FLOOR LINE FLOOR LINE
BELOW FIRST BELOW THIRD ABOVE THIRD BELOW FIRST BELOW THIRD ABOVE THIRD
FLOOR LINE FLOOR LINE FLOOR LINE FLOOR LINE FLOOR LINE FLOOR LINE
INTERIOR SIDE
FIRST FLOOR LINE FIRST FLOOR LINE
2600

2600

2600
450

450

450
2400

2000

1500
2400 2000 1500
F1 - 26 SETS F2 - 15 SETS F3 - 2 SETS
2.40m x 2.40m x 0.45m typical column footing 2.0m x 2.0m x 0.45m typical column footing 1.5m x 1.5m x 0.45m typical column footing
reinforced with 14pcs - 16mm Ø RSB BW reinforced with 13 - 16mm Ø RSB BW reinforced with 13 - 16mm Ø RSB BW
Use Steel Cover of 75mm Use Steel Cover of 75mm Use Steel Cover of 75mm
C1: 26 SETS C2: 15 SETS C2: 2 SETS
550mm x 550mm 1st floor line, 500mm x 500mm above 1st floor line 550mm x 550mm 1st floor line, 400mm x 400mm above 1st floor line 550mm x 550mm 1st floor line, 400mm x 400mm above 1st floor line
12 - 20mm Ø longitudinal RSB above second floor line 12 - 20mm Ø longitudinal RSB above second floor line 12 - 20mm Ø longitudinal RSB above second floor line
8 - 20mm Ø longitudinal RSB above third floor with 10mm Ø lateral ties spaced: 8 - 20mm Ø longitudinal RSB above third floor with 10mm Ø lateral ties 8 - 20mm Ø longitudinal RSB above third floor with 10mm Ø lateral ties
at: 2 @ 0.05m; 2 @ 0.075m & rest @ 0.10m o.c. at below first floor line & first floor spaced: spaced:
column at: 2 @ 0.05m; 2 @ 0.075m & rest @ 0.10m o.c. at below first floor line & at: 2 @ 0.05m; 2 @ 0.075m & rest @ 0.10m o.c. at below first floor line &
at: 2 @ 0.05m; 2 @ 0.075m ; 7 @ 0.10m and rest @ 0.15m o.c. at second floor first floor line first floor line
at: 2 @ 0.05m; 2 @ 0.075m; 7 @ 0.10m; 2 @ 0.15m and rest @ 0.20m o.c. at 3rd at: 2 @ 0.05m; 2 @ 0.075m ; 7 @ 0.10m and rest @ 0.15m o.c. at second at: 2 @ 0.05m; 2 @ 0.075m ; 7 @ 0.10m and rest @ 0.15m o.c. at second
floor floor line floor line
Provide secondary ties at every 3 main ties. at: 2 @ 0.05m; 2 @ 0.075m; 7 @ 0.10m; 2 @ 0.15m and rest @ 0.20m o.c. at: 2 @ 0.05m; 2 @ 0.075m; 7 @ 0.10m; 2 @ 0.15m and rest @ 0.20m o.c.
above 3rd floor above 3rd floor
Provide secondary ties at every 3 main ties. Provide secondary ties at every 3 main ties.
SCHOOL: STUDENT: PROJECT TITLE: INSTRUCTOR: SHEET CONTENT: SHEET NO.
NUEVA VIZCAYA STATE UNIVERSITY ORARIO, NICOLAS P.
MARIANO, EAJAY J. DESIGN ANALYSIS OF A PROPOSED ENGR. JYRUS JYLES D. CADIENTE COLUMN AND FOOTING DETAILS
COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING
PAMPO, JOHN MARK G. 3-STOREY COMMERCIAL BUILDING S-2
BAYOMBONG, NUEVA VIZCAYA ACOSTA, MIKE MELVIN N. SUBJECT NAME: CE PROJECT 2 SCALE: 1:50
 A B C D E F G H I J K L M
46.00
5.00 3.00 1.00 4.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 4.00 1.00 3.00 5.00
B3 B3 B3 B3
1.58

SLAB-7 SLAB-7 SLAB-7 SLAB-7

B1 +3.60 mts B1 +3.60 mts B1 +3.60 mts B1 +3.60 mts B1
FFL FFL FFL FFL
1 B1 B1 B1 B1 B1 B1 B1 B1 B1 B1
2.42

SLAB-6 SLAB-6
B1 +3.60 mts
FFL
B1 B1 +3.60 mts
FFL
B1
SLAB-1 SLAB-3 SLAB-1 SLAB-1 SLAB-1 SLAB-1 SLAB-3 SLAB-1
B1 +3.60 mts
FFL
B1 +3.60 mts
FFL
+3.60 mts
FFL B1 +3.60 mts
FFL B1 +3.60 mts
FFL B1 +3.60 mts
FFL
+3.60 mts
FFL
B1 +3.60 mts
FFL
B1
2 B2 B2
1.08

B2 B2 B2 B2 B2 B2 B2 B2
STAIR STAIR
WELL WELL
3.50

SLAB-1 SLAB-3 SLAB-1 SLAB-1 SLAB-1 SLAB-1 SLAB-3 SLAB-1

B1 +3.60 mts B1 +3.60 mts B1 B1 +3.60 mts B1 +3.60 mts B1 +3.60 mts B1 +3.60 mts B1 B1 +3.60 mts B1 +3.60 mts B1
FFL FFL FFL FFL FFL FFL FFL FFL
3 B1 B1 B1 B1 B1 B1 B1 B1 B1 B1
16.00

CANTILEVER SLAB

CANTILEVER SLAB
3.00

SLAB-2 SLAB-4 SLAB-4 SLAB-2 SLAB-2 SLAB-2 SLAB-2 SLAB-4 SLAB-4 SLAB-2
B1 +3.60 mts B1 +3.60 mts
FFL
B2 +3.60 mts
FFL
B2 +3.60 mts
FFL
B2 +3.60 mts
FFL
B2 +3.60 mts
FFL
B2 +3.60 mts
FFL
B2 +3.60 mts
FFL
B2 +3.60 mts
FFL
B1 +3.60 mts B1
FFL FFL
B2 B2 B2 B2 B2 B2 B2
4 B2 B2 CANTILEVER SLAB CANTILEVER SLAB CANTILEVER SLAB B2
3.00

SLAB-2 SLAB-5 SLAB-5 SLAB-2

B1 +3.60 mts
FFL
B1 +3.60 mts B2 B2 +3.60 mts B1 +3.60 mts B1
FFL FFL FFL
5 B1 B2 B2 B1
3.00

SLAB-2 SLAB-5 SLAB-5 SLAB-2

B2 +3.60 mts
FFL
B2 +3.60 mts
FFL
B2 B2 +3.60 mts B2 +3.60 mts
FFL FFL
B2 B2 B2 B2
6 CANTILEVER SLAB CANTILEVER SLAB
5.00 3.00 1.00 4.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 4.00 1.00 3.00 5.00
1 SECOND FLOOR FRAMING PLAN
SCALE: 1:160
S3
SCHOOL: STUDENT: PROJECT TITLE: INSTRUCTOR: SHEET CONTENT: SHEET NO.
NUEVA VIZCAYA STATE UNIVERSITY ORARIO, NICOLAS P.
MARIANO, EAJAY J. DESIGN ANALYSIS OF A PROPOSED ENGR. JYRUS JYLES D. CADIENTE SECOND FLOOR FRAMING PLAN
COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING
PAMPO, JOHN MARK G. 3-STOREY COMMERCIAL BUILDING S-3
BAYOMBONG, NUEVA VIZCAYA ACOSTA, MIKE MELVIN N. SUBJECT NAME: CE PROJECT 2 SCALE: 1:160
 A B C D E F G H I J K L M
46.00
5.00 3.00 1.00 4.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 4.00 1.00 3.00 5.00
B6 B6 B6 B6
1.58

SLAB-7 SLAB-7 SLAB-7 SLAB-7

+7.20 mts +7.20 mts +7.20 mts +7.20 mts
FFL FFL FFL FFL
1 B4 B4 B4 B4 B4 B4 B4 B4 B4 B4
2.42

SLAB-6 SLAB-6
+7.20 mts
FFL
B4 +7.20 mts
FFL
B4
SLAB-1 SLAB-3 SLAB-1 SLAB-1 SLAB-1 SLAB-1 SLAB-3 SLAB-1
B4 +7.20 mts
FFL
B4 +7.20 mts
FFL
+7.20 mts
FFL
+7.20 mts
FFL
+7.20 mts
FFL
+7.20 mts
FFL
+7.20 mts
FFL B4 +7.20 mts
FFL
B4
2 B5 B5
1.08

B5 B5 B5 B5 B5 B5 B5 B5
STAIR STAIR
B4 WELL B4 WELL
3.50

SLAB-1 SLAB-3 SLAB-1 SLAB-1 SLAB-1 SLAB-1 SLAB-3 SLAB-1

B4 +7.20 mts
FFL
B4 +7.20 mts
FFL
+7.20 mts
FFL
B4 +7.20 mts
FFL
B4 +7.20 mts
FFL
B4 +7.20 mts
FFL
B4 B4 +7.20 mts
FFL
B4 +7.20 mts
FFL
B4
3 B4 B4 B4 B4 B4 B4 B4 B4 B4 B4
16.00

CANTILEVER SLAB

CANTILEVER SLAB
3.00

SLAB-2 SLAB-4 SLAB-4 SLAB-2 SLAB-2 SLAB-2 SLAB-2 SLAB-4 SLAB-4 SLAB-2
B4 +7.20 mts B4 +7.20 mts
FFL
B5 +7.20 mts
FFL
B5 +7.20 mts B5 +7.20 mts B5 +7.20 mts
FFL
B5 +7.20 mts B5 +7.20 mts B5 +7.20 mts
FFL
B4 +7.20 mts B4
FFL FFL FFL FFL FFL FFL
B5 B5 B5 B5 B5 B5 B5
4 B5 B5 CANTILEVER SLAB CANTILEVER SLAB CANTILEVER SLAB B5
3.00

SLAB-2 SLAB-5 SLAB-5 SLAB-2

B4 +7.20 mts
FFL
B4 +7.20 mts B5 B5 +7.20 mts B4 +7.20 mts B4
FFL FFL FFL
5 B4 B5 B5 B5
3.00

SLAB-2 SLAB-5 SLAB-5 SLAB-2

B5 +7.20 mts
FFL
B5 +7.20 mts
FFL
B5 B5 +7.20 mts
FFL
B5 B5 +7.20 mts
FFL
B5
B5 B5 B5 B5
6 CANTILEVER SLAB CANTILEVER SLAB
5.00 3.00 1.00 4.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 4.00 1.00 3.00 5.00
1 THIRD FLOOR FRAMING PLAN
SCALE: 1:160
S4
SCHOOL: STUDENT: PROJECT TITLE: INSTRUCTOR: SHEET CONTENT: SHEET NO.
NUEVA VIZCAYA STATE UNIVERSITY ORARIO, NICOLAS P.
MARIANO, EAJAY J. DESIGN ANALYSIS OF A PROPOSED ENGR. JYRUS JYLES D. CADIENTE THIRD FLOOR FRAMING PLAN
COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING
PAMPO, JOHN MARK G. 3-STOREY COMMERCIAL BUILDING S-4
BAYOMBONG, NUEVA VIZCAYA ACOSTA, MIKE MELVIN N. SUBJECT NAME: CE PROJECT 2 SCALE: 1:160
 A B C D E F G H I J K L M
46.00
5.00 3.00 1.00 4.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 4.00 1.00 3.00 5.00
B8 B8 B8 B8
1.58

B7 B7 B7 B7 B7
1 B7 B7 B7 B7 B7 B7 B7 B7 B7 B7
2.42

B7 B7 B7 B7
B7 B7 B7 B7
2 B7 B7
1.08

B8 B8 B8 B8 B8 B8 B8 B8
3.50

B7 B7 B7 B7 B7 B7 B7 B7 B7 B7 B7
3 B7 B7 B7 B7 B7 B7 B7 B7 B7 B7
16.00

CANTILEVER SLAB

CANTILEVER SLAB
3.00

B7 B7 B8 B8 B8 B8 B8 B8 B8 B7 B7
B8 B8 B8 B8 B8 B8 B8
4 B8 B8 CANTILEVER SLAB CANTILEVER SLAB CANTILEVER SLAB B8
3.00

B7 B7 B8 B8 B7 B7
5 B7 B8 B8 B7
3.00

B8 B8 B8 B8 B8 B8
B8 B8 B8 B8
6 CANTILEVER SLAB CANTILEVER SLAB
5.00 3.00 1.00 4.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 4.00 1.00 3.00 5.00
1 ROOF BEAM PLAN
SCALE: 1:160
S5
SCHOOL: STUDENT: PROJECT TITLE: INSTRUCTOR: SHEET CONTENT: SHEET NO.
NUEVA VIZCAYA STATE UNIVERSITY ORARIO, NICOLAS P.
MARIANO, EAJAY J. DESIGN ANALYSIS OF A PROPOSED ENGR. JYRUS JYLES D. CADIENTE ROOF BEAM PLAN
COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING
PAMPO, JOHN MARK G. 3-STOREY COMMERCIAL BUILDING S-5
BAYOMBONG, NUEVA VIZCAYA ACOSTA, MIKE MELVIN N. SUBJECT NAME: CE PROJECT 2 SCALE: 1:160
 A B C D E F G H I J K L M
46.00
5.00 3.00 1.00 4.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 4.00 1.00 3.00 5.00
1.58

1
2.42

2
1.08

T-1A

T-1A

T-1A

T-1A
T-3

T-2

T-2

T-2

T-2

T-2

T-2

T-2

T-2

T-2

T-3
3.50

3
16.00

T-1

T-1

T-1

T-1

T-1

T-1
3.00

4
3.00

5
T-1B

T-1B
3.00

6
1 ROOF FRAMING PLAN
SCALE: 1:160
S6
SCHOOL: STUDENT: PROJECT TITLE: INSTRUCTOR: SHEET CONTENT: SHEET NO.
NUEVA VIZCAYA STATE UNIVERSITY ORARIO, NICOLAS P.
MARIANO, EAJAY J. DESIGN ANALYSIS OF A PROPOSED ENGR. JYRUS JYLES D. CADIENTE ROOF FRAMING PLAN
COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING
PAMPO, JOHN MARK G. 3-STOREY COMMERCIAL BUILDING S-6
BAYOMBONG, NUEVA VIZCAYA ACOSTA, MIKE MELVIN N. SUBJECT NAME: CE PROJECT 2 SCALE: 1:160
 1 100 x 50 x 1.5mm THK C-PURLINS
SPACED @ 0.76m AS SHOWN
3 5
3" x 3" x 16 " THK ANGLE BAR 5 6
TOP CHORD
7.00 6.00 3.00
18.97

2.72
T-1
1.44

5
3" x 3" x 16 " THK ANGLE BAR
5
WEB MEMBERS 3" x 3" x 16 " THK ANGLE BAR
BOTTOM CHORD
16 SPACED @ 1.00m
5
3" x 3" x 16 " THK ANGLE BAR
1 100mm x 50mm x 1.5mm THK C-PURLINS
SPACED @ 0.76m AS SHOWN
3 4 TOP CHORD
7.00 3.00
15.09
T-2

6
2.8
0.71 0.64 10 SPACED @ 1.00m
5
3" x 3" x 16 " THK ANGLE BAR
WEB MEMBERS
5
3" x 3" x 16 " THK ANGLE BAR
WEB MEMBERS
1 100mm x 50mm x 1.5mm THK C-PURLINS
SPACED @ 0.76m AS SHOWN
3 4
14.00 6.00
12.96
1 TYPICAL TRUSS DETAILS
SCALE: 1:50
S7

1.21
0.72

T-3

6
2.8
10 SPACED @ 1.00m
SCHOOL: STUDENT: PROJECT TITLE: INSTRUCTOR: SHEET CONTENT: SHEET NO.
NUEVA VIZCAYA STATE UNIVERSITY ORARIO, NICOLAS P.
MARIANO, EAJAY J. DESIGN ANALYSIS OF A PROPOSED ENGR. JYRUS JYLES D. CADIENTE TYPICAL TRUSS DETAILS
COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING
PAMPO, JOHN MARK G. 3-STOREY COMMERCIAL BUILDING S-7
BAYOMBONG, NUEVA VIZCAYA ACOSTA, MIKE MELVIN N. SUBJECT NAME: CE PROJECT 2 SCALE: 1:160
 THIRD FLOOR BEAMS
250 250
120

120
3 - 20Ø TOP BARS 3 - 20Ø TOP BARS
SCHEDULE OF BEAMS 2 - 16Ø AT 120mm 2 - 16Ø AT 120mm
LOCATION @ SUPPORT @ MIDSPAN STIRRUPS (Gr. 40) B-4 Ø10mm RSB: 2 @ 50mm, 2 @ 75mm, 7
550

550
2 - 12 Ø AT H/2 2 - 12 Ø AT H/2 @100mm, 2 @ 150mm and rest @
TIE BEAM & LANDING BEAM 200mm
300 300 2 - 16Ø AT 120mm 2 - 16Ø AT 120mm
120

120
3 - 20Ø BTM BARS 3 - 20Ø BTM BARS
3 - 20Ø TOP BARS 3 - 20Ø TOP BARS
Ø10mm RSB: 2 @ 50mm, 2 @ 75mm, 2
250 250
500

500

TB 2 - 12Ø AT H/2 2 - 12Ø AT H/2 @100mm, 2 @ 150mm and rest @

120

120
200mm 3 - 20Ø TOP BARS 3 - 20Ø TOP BARS
2 - 16 Ø AT 120mm 2 - 16 Ø AT 120mm
3 - 20Ø BTM BARS 3 - 20Ø BTM BARS
B-5 Ø10mm RSB: 2 @ 50mm, 2 @ 75mm, 7

500

500
2 - 12 Ø AT H/2 2 - 12 Ø AT H/2
@100mm, 2 @ 150mm and rest @
200 200 200mm
2 - 16 Ø AT 120mm 2 - 16 Ø AT 120mm

120

120
2 - 20Ø & 2 - 20Ø & 3 - 20Ø BTM BARS 3 - 20Ø BTM BARS
2 - 16Ø TOP BARS 2 - 16Ø TOP BARS
LB Ø10mm RSB: 2 @ 50mm, 2 @ 75mm, 7
400

400

@100mm, 2 @ 150mm and rest @ 150 150

2 - 20Ø & 2 - 20Ø &
2 - 16Ø BTM BARS 2 - 16Ø BTM BARS 200mm
2 - 16Ø & 2 - 16Ø &
2 - 12Ø TOP BARS 2 - 12Ø TOP BARS
Ø10mm RSB Links: 2 @ 50mm, 2 @
B-6

550

550
75mm, 7 @100mm, 2 @ 150mm and
rest @ 200mm
2 - 16Ø & 2 - 16Ø &
SECOND FLOOR BEAMS 2 - 12Ø BTM BARS 2 - 12Ø BTM BARS
250 250
120

120

3 - 20Ø TOP BARS 3 - 20Ø TOP BARS

2 - 16Ø AT 120mm 2 - 16Ø AT 120mm
B-1 Ø10mm RSB: 2 @ 50mm, 2 @ 75mm, 7
ROOF BEAMS
600

600

2 - 12 Ø AT H/2 2 - 12 Ø AT H/2 @100mm, 2 @ 150mm and rest @

200mm 250 250
2 - 16Ø AT 120mm 2 - 16Ø AT 120mm

120

120
3 - 16Ø TOP BARS 3 - 16Ø TOP BARS
120

120

3 - 20Ø BTM BARS 3 - 20Ø BTM BARS

2 - 12Ø AT 120mm 2 - 12Ø AT 120mm

450

450
RB-1 Ø10mm RSB: 2 @ 50mm, 2 @ 75mm, 7
250 250 @100mm, 2 @ 150mm and rest @
2 - 12Ø AT 120mm 2 - 12Ø AT 120mm

120

120
120

120

3 - 20Ø TOP BARS 3 - 20Ø TOP BARS 3 - 16Ø BTM BARS 3 - 16Ø BTM BARS 200mm
2 - 16 Ø AT 120mm 2 - 16 Ø AT 120mm
B-2 Ø10mm RSB: 2 @ 50mm, 2 @ 75mm, 7
550

550

2 - 12 Ø AT H/2 2 - 12 Ø AT H/2
@100mm, 2 @ 150mm and rest @ 250 250
2 - 16 Ø AT 120mm 2 - 16 Ø AT 120mm
200mm

120

120
120

120

3 - 16Ø TOP BARS 3 - 16Ø TOP BARS

3 - 20Ø BTM BARS 3 - 20Ø BTM BARS
2 - 12Ø AT 120mm 2 - 12Ø AT 120mm

450

450
RB-2 Ø10mm RSB: 2 @ 50mm, 2 @ 75mm, 7
150 150 2 - 12Ø AT 120mm 2 - 12Ø AT 120mm @100mm, 2 @ 150mm and rest @

120

120
3 - 16Ø BTM BARS 3 - 16Ø BTM BARS 200mm
2 - 16Ø & 2 - 16Ø &
2 - 12Ø TOP BARS 2 - 12Ø TOP BARS
Ø10mm RSB Links: 2 @ 50mm, 2 @
B-3
600

600
75mm, 7 @100mm, 2 @ 150mm and
rest @ 200mm
2 - 16Ø & 2 - 16Ø & 150 150
2 - 12Ø BTM BARS 2 - 12Ø BTM BARS 2 - 16Ø & 2 - 16Ø &
2 - 12Ø TOP BARS 2 - 12Ø TOP BARS
Ø10mm RSB Links: 2 @ 50mm, 2 @
RB-3
75mm, 7 @100mm, 2 @ 150mm and rest

450

450
@ 200mm
2 - 16Ø & 2 - 16Ø &
2 - 12Ø BTM BARS 2 - 12Ø BTM BARS
1 SCHEDULE OF BEAMS
SCALE: NTS
S8
SCHOOL: STUDENT: PROJECT TITLE: INSTRUCTOR: SHEET CONTENT: SHEET NO.
NUEVA VIZCAYA STATE UNIVERSITY ORARIO, NICOLAS P.
MARIANO, EAJAY J. DESIGN ANALYSIS OF A PROPOSED ENGR. JYRUS JYLES D. CADIENTE SCHEDULE OF BEAMS
COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING
PAMPO, JOHN MARK G. 3-STOREY COMMERCIAL BUILDING S-8
BAYOMBONG, NUEVA VIZCAYA ACOSTA, MIKE MELVIN N. SUBJECT NAME: CE PROJECT 2 SCALE: NTS
APPENDIX B

30
- Properties:
ROOFBEAM1 250x450 R1 Psi f 'c (MPa) fc (KN/m2) Ec
ROOFBEAM2 250x400 R2 4000 27.58 27579.0 2.46824E+07
ROOFBEAM3 150x450 R3
3FBEAM1 250x550 R4
3FBEAM2 250x500 R5
3FBEAM1 150x550 R6
2FBEAM1 250x600 R7
2FBEAM2 250x550 R8
2FBEAM3 150x600 R9
TIEBEAM1 300x500 R10
TIEBEAM2 200x500 R11
3FCOLUMN1 450x450 R12
3FCOLUMN2 400x400 R13
2FCOLUMN1 450x450 R14
2FCOLUMN2 400x400 R15
1FCOLUMN1 450x450 R16
1FCOLUMN2 400x400 R17
FCOLUMN 550x550 R18
2FLBEAM 200x400 R19
1FLBEAM 200x400 R20

- Assigning Cracked Sections:

o Analytical Modelling, Specifications, Beam, Property Reduction Factors,

RAX = 1, RIX = 0.7, RIY = 0.7, RIZ = 0.7, Add, (assign this to all columns)
o Analytical Modelling, Specifications, Beam, Property Reduction Factors,
RAX = 1, RIX = 0.01, RIY = 0.35, RIZ = 0.35, Add, (assign this to all beams)

- Offset:

R1 -0.225 Start & End

R2 -0.200 Start & End
R3 -0.225 Start & End
R4 -0.275 Start & End
R5 -0.250 Start & End
R6 -0.275 Start & End
R7 -0.300 Start & End
R8 -0.275 Start & End
R9 -0.300 Start & End
R11 -0.250 Start & End
R19 -0.200 Start & End
R20 -0.200 Start & End

31
- Diaphragm:

No. Height
1 2.5m
2 6.1m
3 9.7m
4 13.05m

- Wind Load:
o Parameters

Design Wind Speed, V 254 kph

Occupancy Category IV Standard Occupancy

Roughness Category D

Exposure Category C

Wind Directionality Factor, Kd 0.85

Topographic Factor, Kzt 1.00

Gust Factor, G 0.85

Importance Factor, I 1.0 Standard Occupancy

- Seismic Parameters:
o Closest distance to known seismic source, Km = 7.1 km
Type: UBC 97 Parameters
Staad NSCP
Zone 0.4 4
Iw 1 1
Rwx 8.5 8.5
RwZ 8.5 8.5
Stype 4 SD
Na 1.2 1.2
Nv 1.4 1.4
Ct 0.0731 0.0731

32
 - Load Cases:

o Dead Load 1 (SELFWEIGHT):

Selfweight Factor = -1 Selfweight
FLOOR LOADS:
3F and 2F Slab Loads Unitweight for ceramic tile and concrete = 23.5616 KN/m3
100mm thick slab 2.360 Kpa
3F_2W_P (1) -2.360 Kpa Floor Load, Group
2F_2W_P (2) -2.360 Kpa Floor Load, Group
STAIR LOADS: Note: Design of stair is not included here.
Note: See Design of Stairs in Staad (adopt dead reaction)
Note: Railing to be used is hollow GI pipe…. CHB not allowed!!!
Third Floor -20.56 KN/m Member Load, Uniform Force (partial)
Landing -18.45 KN/m Member Load, Uniform Force
Second Floor -20.56 KN/m Member Load, Uniform Force
landing -18.45 KN/m Member Load, Uniform Force
First floor -20.56 KN/m Member Load, Uniform Force (partial)

o Dead Load 2 (Superimposed Deadload):

ROOF LOADS:
a -5.171 -22.869 -7.81 -3.148 -0.279 -16.377 -34.269 -1.74 Nodal Load
-
a -5.171 -34.269 -1.74 Member Load, Concentrated Force
22.869 -7.81 -3.148 -0.279 -16.377
ROOF FIREWALL LOADS (at ends, 4"CHB plastered one face only)
16m exterior beam* Member Load, Linear Varying
Height = 1.7m -4.658 KN/m
Height = 1.493m -4.093 KN/m
Height = 1.288m -3.528 KN/m
Height = 1.081m -2.963 KN/m
Height = 0.841m -2.303 KN/m
Height = 0.600m -1.644 KN/m
8m exterior beam* Member Load, Uniform Force
Height = 1.7m -4.658 KN/m
37m exterior beam* Member Load, Uniform Force
Height = 1.288m -3.528 KN/m
46m exterior beam* Member Load, Uniform Force
Height = 0.600m -1.644 KN/m
1.58m exterior beam* Member Load, Linear Varying
Height = 0.600m -1.644 KN/m
Height = 0.300m -0.822 KN/m
20m exterior beam* Member Load, Uniform Force
Height = 0.300m -0.822 KN/m
20m exterior beam* Member Load, Uniform Force

33
Height = 1.081m -2.963 KN/m
3F WALL LOADS:
Walls: plastered both face
4" Exterior Wall
2.98 Kpa Height = 2.9 -8.642 KN/m Member Load, Uniform Force
2.98 Kpa Height = 1 -2.980 KN/m Member Load, Uniform Force
0.74 Kpa Height = 2.9 -2.146 KN/m Member Load, Uniform Force
0.74 Kpa Height = 1 -0.740 KN/m Member Load, Uniform Force
4" Interior Wall *
2.98 Kpa Height = 2.9 -8.642 KN/m Member Load, Uniform Force

2F WALL LOADS:
Walls: plastered both face
4" Exterior Wall
2.98 Kpa Height = 3.1 -9.238 KN/m Member Load, Uniform Force
2.98 Kpa Height = 1 -2.980 KN/m Member Load, Uniform Force
0.74 Kpa Height = 1 -0.740 KN/m Member Load, Uniform Force
4" Interior Wall *
2.98 Kpa Height = 3.1 -9.238 KN/m Member Load, Uniform Force

1F WALL LOADS:
Walls: plastered both face (T204-2)
4" Exterior Wall
2.98 Kpa Height = 3.1 -9.238 KN/m Member Load, Uniform Force
4" Interior Wall *
2.98 Kpa Height = 3.1 -9.238 KN/m Member Load, Uniform Force

FLOOR LOADS:
3F_2W_P (1) -2.776 Kpa Floor Load, Group
2F_2W_P (2) -2.776 Kpa Floor Load, Group

o Live Load:
FLOOR LOADS:
3F_2W_P (1) -3.600 Kpa Floor Load, Group
2F_2W_P (2) -3.600 Kpa Floor Load, Group
STAIR LOADS:
Liveload
Note: See Design of Stairs in Staad (adopt dead reaction)
Third Floor -1.20825 -5.665 KN/m Member Load, Uniform Force (partial)
Landing -1.1575 -5.225 KN/m Member Load, Uniform Force
Second Flo -1.20825 -5.665 KN/m Member Load, Uniform Force
landing -1.1575 -5.225 KN/m Member Load, Uniform Force
First floor -1.20825 -5.665 KN/m Member Load, Uniform Force (partial)
ROOF LOADS (not included since nobody lives in roof):

34
- Earthquake Load:

load Case Direction Factor Acc. Nat.

EX1 X 1 0.05 1
EX2 X -1 0.05 1
EZ1 Z 1 0.05 1
EZ2 Z -1 0.05 1

Note : Data below are taken from Seismic Definitions

Soil Profile Type: SD

Seismic Zone Factor:
ZONE: 4
Z = 0.4
Near Source Factor:
Seismic Source Type: A
Closest Distance to Known Seismic Source, Km: 7 . 1 km
Na = 1.140
Nv = 1.480

Seismic Coefficient:
Ca = 0.528
Cv = 0.896
Design Response Spectra:
TS = Cv/2.5Ca = 0.697 sec
T0 = 0.2TS = 0.1358 sec

35
Period, T Acceleration,
(sec) Sa (g) m/s2
0 0.528
0.1358 1.32
0.679 1.32
1 0.896
1.2 0.747
1.4 0.64
1.6 0.56
1.8 0.498
2 0.448
2.2 0.407
2.4 0.373
2.6 0.345
2.8 0.32
3 0.299
3.2 0.28
3.4 0.264
3.6 0.249
3.8 0.236
4 0.224
4.2 0.213
4.4 0.204
4.6 0.195
4.8 0.187
5 0.179
5.2 0.172
5.4 0.166
5.6 0.16
5.8 0.154
6 0.149
6.2 0.145
6.4 0.14
6.6 0.136
6.8 0.132
7 0.128
7.2 0.124
7.4 0.121
7.6 0.118
7.8 0.115
8 0.112

36
- Preliminary Analysis:
o Structure Period:

- Static Base
Shears: Static Base Shear (EZ) = 3377.07 KN
Static Base Shear (EX) = 3377.07 KN

37
 - Dynamic Base Shears:
Dynamic Base Shear (EZ) = 3206.62 KN
Dynamic Base Shear (EX) = 3180.62 KN

Calculating Scale Factors:

0.9Vstatic = Vdynamic
0.9Vstatic EZ = 3039.363 KN
0.9Vstatic EX = 3039.363 KN
Scale Factor for RSZ = 0.9Vstatic EZ / Dynamic Base Shear EZ = 0.947840
Final Scale Factor for RSZ = (I/R) x Scale Factor for RSZ = 0.111511
Scale Factor for RSX = 0.9Vstatic EX / Dynamic Base Shear EX = 0.955588
Final Scale Factor for RSX = (I/R) x Scale Factor for RX = 0.112422

38
 Number Name and Factors
51 1.2D + 0.5L + RSX
52 1.2D + 0.5L + RSZ
53 1.2D + 0.5L - RSX NSCP 2015 load combinations for drift check
54 1.2D + 0.5L - RSZ
55 0.9D + RSX
56 0.9D + RSZ
57 0.9D - RSX
58 0.9D - RSZ

Center of Mass, Inherent Torsion, Accidental Torsion Distance Remarks

CM Center of Rigidity, CR CM-CR (5% of Bldg.Dim.) Acc.Tor. > Inh. Tor.
X Z X Z X Z X (0.05*17) Z (0.05*12.3) X Z
23.0 5.711 23.0 7.351 0.000 -1.640 0.85 0.615 ok ok
23.0 5.797 23.0 7.015 0.000 -1.218 0.85 0.615 ok ok
23.0 5.827 23.0 6.953 0.000 -1.126 0.85 0.615 ok ok
23.0 6.419 23.0 6.932 0.000 -0.513 0.85 0.615 ok ok

o Wind Storey Forces Z-direction:

39
o Wind Storey Forces X-direction:

40
 - Ultimate Load Combinations for design of beams, columns and shearwalls:

o Basic Load Combinations

1.45D + 0.5L + 1.0 RSX + 0.3RSZ

1.45D + 0.5L + 1.0 RSX - 0.3RSZ
1.45D + 0.5L + 1.0 RSX + 0.3RSZ
1.45D + 0.5L + 1.0 RSX - 0.3RSZ
1.45D + 0.5L + 1.0 RSZ + 0.3RSX Note:
1.45D + 0.5L + 1.0 RSZ - 0.3RSX This combination is highly dependent on distance to seismic source.
1.45D + 0.5L + 1.0 RSZ + 0.3RSX If not sure, assume closest distance then use 1.53D + 0.5L + E
1.45D + 0.5L + 1.0 RSZ - 0.3RSX 203-19
0.95D + 0.5L + 1.0 RSX + 0.3RSZ
0.95D + 0.5L + 1.0 RSX - 0.3RSZ
0.95D + 0.5L + 1.0 RSX + 0.3RSZ
0.95D + 0.5L + 1.0 RSX - 0.3RSZ
0.95D + 0.5L + 1.0 RSZ + 0.3RSX
0.95D + 0.5L + 1.0 RSZ - 0.3RSX
0.95D + 0.5L + 1.0 RSZ + 0.3RSX
0.95D + 0.5L + 1.0 RSZ - 0.3RSX

1.15D + 1.0 RSX + 0.3RSZ

1.15D + 1.0 RSX - 0.3RSZ
1.15D - 1.0 RSX + 0.3RSZ
1.15D - 1.0 RSX - 0.3RSZ
1.15D + 1.0 RSZ + 0.3RSX Note: For load combination 0.9D + E , check for
1.15D + 1.0 RSZ - 0.3RSX columns in tension as these will cause overturning. In
1.15D - 1.0 RSZ + 0.3RSX case of overturning, use anchor piles and design
columns for tension.
1.15D - 1.0 RSZ - 0.3RSX
0.65D + 1.0 RSX + 0.3RSZ This combination is highly dependent on distance to seismic
0.65D + 1.0 RSX - 0.3RSZ source
0.65D - 1.0 RSX + 0.3RSZ If not sure, assume closest distance then use the
0.65D - 1.0 RSX - 0.3RSZ following combinations: 1.23D±E , 0.57D ± E
0.65D + 1.0 RSZ + 0.3RSX
0.65D + 1.0 RSZ - 0.3RSX
0.65D - 1.0 RSZ + 0.3RSX
0.65D - 1.0 RSZ - 0.3RSX

41
 Number Name and Factors
101 1.4D
102 1.2D + 1.6 L
201 1.45D + 0.5L + 1.0 RSX + 0.3RSZ
202 1.45D + 0.5L + 1.0 RSX - 0.3RSZ
203 1.45D + 0.5L - 1.0 RSX + 0.3RSZ
204 1.45D + 0.5L - 1.0 RSX - 0.3RSZ
205 1.45D + 0.5L + 1.0 RSZ + 0.3RSX
206 1.45D + 0.5L + 1.0 RSZ - 0.3RSX
207 1.45D + 0.5L - 1.0 RSZ + 0.3RSX
208 1.45D + 0.5L - 1.0 RSZ - 0.3RSX
209 0.95D + 0.5L + 1.0 RSX + 0.3RSZ NSCP 2015 ACI-318 load
210 0.95D + 0.5L + 1.0 RSX - 0.3RSZ combinations for design of beams,
211 0.95D + 0.5L - 1.0 RSX + 0.3RSZ columns and shearwalls
212 0.95D + 0.5L - 1.0 RSX - 0.3RSZ
213 0.95D + 0.5L + 1.0 RSZ + 0.3RSX
214 0.95D + 0.5L + 1.0 RSZ - 0.3RSX
215 0.95D + 0.5L - 1.0 RSZ + 0.3RSX * However, if these load
216 0.95D + 0.5L - 1.0 RSZ - 0.3RSX combinations result to
217 1.15D + 1.0 RSX + 0.3RSZ uneconomical column sections,
218 1.15D + 1.0 RSX - 0.3RSZ rho, P can be reduced to 1.
219 1.15D - 1.0 RSX + 0.3RSZ
220 1.15D - 1.0 RSX - 0.3RSZ (all factors for E will be 1)
221 1.15D + 1.0 RSZ + 0.3RSX
222 1.15D + 1.0 RSZ - 0.3RSX
223 1.15D - 1.0 RSZ + 0.3RSX
224 1.15D - 1.0 RSZ - 0.3RSX
225 0.65D - 1.0 RSX + 0.3RSZ
226 0.65D - 1.0 RSX - 0.3RSZ
227 0.65D + 1.0 RSX + 0.3RSZ
228 0.65D + 1.0 RSX - 0.3RSZ
229 0.65D - 1.0 RSZ + 0.3RSX
230 0.65D - 1.0 RSZ - 0.3RSX
231 0.65D + 1.0 RSZ + 0.3RSX
232 0.65D + 1.0 RSZ - 0.3RSX

- Ultimate Load Combinations for foundation design (same as for beams, columns and
shearwalls):

42
Number Name and Factors
301 1.4D
302 1.2D + 1.6 L
401 1.45D + 0.5L + 1.0 EX1 + 0.3EZ1
402 1.45D + 0.5L + 1.0 EX1 + 0.3EZ2
403 1.45D + 0.5L + 1.0 EX2 + 0.3EZ1
404 1.45D + 0.5L + 1.0 EX2 + 0.3EZ2
405 1.45D + 0.5L + 1.0 EZ1 + 0.3EX1
406 1.45D + 0.5L + 1.0 EZ1 + 0.3EX2
407 1.45D + 0.5L + 1.0 EZ2 + 0.3EX1
408 1.45D + 0.5L + 1.0 EZ2 + 0.3EX2
409 0.95D + 0.5L + 1.0 EX1 + 0.3EZ1 NSCP 2015 ACI-318 load
410 0.95D + 0.5L + 1.0 EX1 + 0.3EZ2
411 0.95D + 0.5L + 1.0 EX2 + 0.3EZ1 combinations for foundation design
412 0.95D + 0.5L + 1.0 EX2 + 0.3EZ2
413 0.95D + 0.5L + 1.0 EZ1 + 0.3EX1
414 0.95D + 0.5L + 1.0 EZ1 + 0.3EX2 * However, if these load
415 0.95D + 0.5L + 1.0 EZ2 + 0.3EX1 combinations result to
416 0.95D + 0.5L + 1.0 EZ2 + 0.3EX2 uneconomical column sections,
417 1.15D + 1.0 EX1 + 0.3EZ1
418 1.15D + 1.0 EX1 + 0.3EZ2 rho, P can be reduced to 1.
419 1.15D + 1.0 EX2 + 0.3EZ1 (all factors for E will be 1)
420 1.15D + 1.0 EX2 + 0.3EZ2
421 1.15D + 1.0 EZ1 + 0.3EX1
422 1.15D + 1.0 EZ1 + 0.3EX2
423 1.15D + 1.0 EZ2 + 0.3EX1
424 1.15D + 1.0 EZ2 + 0.3EX2
425 0.65D + 1.0 EX1 + 0.3EZ1
426 0.65D + 1.0 EX1 + 0.3EZ2
427 0.65D + 1.0 EX2 + 0.3EZ1
428 0.65D + 1.0 EX2 + 0.3EZ2
429 0.65D + 1.0 EZ1 + 0.3EX1
430 0.65D + 1.0 EZ1 + 0.3EX2
431 0.65D + 1.0 EZ2 + 0.3EX1
432 0.65D + 1.0 EZ2 + 0.3EX2

43
 - Service Load Combinations for Foundation design:

Number Name and Factors

501 D+L
601 D + L + 0.7143EX1 + 0.2143EZ1
602 D + L + 0.7143EX1 + 0.2143EZ2
NSCP 2015 ACI Combinations
603 D + L + 0.7143EX2 + 0.2143EZ1
service load combinations for
604 D + L + 0.7143EX2 + 0.2143EZ2
foundation design
605 D + L + 0.7143EZ1 + 0.2143EX1
606 D + L + 0.7143EZ1 + 0.2143EX2
607 D + L + 0.7143EZ2 + 0.2143EX1
608 D + L + 0.7143EZ2 + 0.2143EX2

44
APPENDIX C

45
 CURICULUM VITAE

MIKE MELVIN NACIS

Brgy. Malannao, Angadanan, Isabela
Contact #: 09682438331
E-mail Address: mmnacis03@gmail.com

PERSONAL INFORMATION

Gender: Male
Age: 22
Date of Birth: December 3, 2001
Place of Birth: Malannao, Angadanan, Isabela
Civil Status: Single
Citizenship: Filipino
Religion: Jehovah Witnesses
Mothers Name: May Ann N. Acosta
Fathers Name: Arnel S. Acosta

EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND

Tertiary NUEVA VIZCAYA STATE UNIVERSITY

Bayombong, Nueva Vizcaya
(Undergraduate 4th Year College)

Senior High School SAN FRANCISCO HIGH SCOOL

Quezon City, Metro Manila
S.Y. 2019-2020

Secondary ANGADANAN NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL

Angadanan, Isabela
S.Y. 2017-2018

Primary MALASIN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL

Angadanan, Isabela
S.Y. 2013-2014

46
 CURICULUM VITAE

EAJAY J. MARIANO
Brgy. Magsaysay, Bayombong, Nueva Vizcaya
Contact #: 09095880935
E-mail Address: eajaymariano26@gmail.com

PERSONAL INFORMATION

Gender: Male
Age: 24
Date of Birth: March 14, 2000
Place of Birth: Magsaysay, Bayombong, Nueva Vizcaya
Civil Status: Single
Citizenship: Filipino
Religion: Roman Catholic
Mothers Name: Emerita J. Mariano
Fathers Name: Albert P. Mariano

EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND

Tertiary NUEVA VIZCAYA STATE UNIVERSITY

Bayombong, Nueva Vizcaya
(Undergraduate 4th Year College)

Senior High School NUEVA VIZCAYA GENERAL COMPREHENSIVE HIGH SCHOOL

Bayombong, Nueva Vizcaya
S.Y. 2017-2018

Secondary NUEVA VIZCAYA GENERAL COMPREHENSIVE HIGH SCHOOL

Bayombong, Nueva Vizcaya
S.Y. 2015-2016

Primary MAGSAYSAY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL

Bayombong. Nueva Vizcaya
S.Y. 2013-2014

47
 CURICULUM VITAE

NICOLAS P. ORARIO
Brgy. Malannao, Angadanan, Isabela
Contact #: 09610080821
E-mail Address: orarionicolas@gmail.com

PERSONAL INFORMATION

Gender: Male
Age: 24
Date of Birth: September 12, 1999
Place of Birth: Tulaed, Mayoyao, Ifugao
Civil Status: Single
Citizenship: Filipino
Religion: Roman Catholic

EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND

Tertiary NUEVA VIZCAYA STATE UNIVERSITY

Bayombong, Nueva Vizcaya
(Undergraduate 4th Year College)

Secondary TULAED NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL

Tulaed, Mayoyao, Ifugao
S.Y. 2011-2015

Primary TULAED ELEMENTARY SCHOOL

Tulaed, Mayoyao, Ifugao
S.Y. 2013-2014

48
 CURICULUM VITAE

JOHN MARK G. PAMPO

Brgy. Luyang, Bayombong, Nueva Vizcaya
Contact #: 09758519909
E-mail Address: jmpampo@gmail.com

PERSONAL INFORMATION

Gender: Male
Age: 24
Date of Birth: December 10, 1999
Place of Birth: Bayombong, Nueva Vizcaya
Civil Status: Single
Citizenship: Filipino
Religion: Roman Catholic
Mothers Name: Dennelyne G. Pampo
Fathers Name: Roderick O. Pampo

EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND

Tertiary NUEVA VIZCAYA STATE UNIVERSITY

Bayombong, Nueva Vizcaya
(Undergraduate 4th Year College)

Senior High School NUEVA VIZCAYA GENERAL COMPREHENSIVE HIGH SCHOOL

Bayombong, Nueva Vizcaya
S.Y. 2017-2018

Secondary NUEVA VIZCAYA GENERAL COMPREHENSIVE HIGH SCHOOL

Bayombong, Nueva Vizcaya
S.Y. 2015-2016

Primary LA TORRE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL

Bayombong, Nueva Vizcaya
S.Y. 2011-2012

49