Quay Wall Ramy Adel
Quay Wall Ramy Adel
Quay Wall Ramy Adel
FACULTY OF ENGINEERING
Transportation Department
HARBOUR
QUAY WALLS
RAMY ADEL ZAKI AHMED
01093039939
TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT
Contents
Introduction ________________________________________________________________________________________ 1
‘Quay wall’ Definition ________________________________________________________________________2
1- INTRODUCTION
Egypt enjoys a unique strategic location in the center of the world, from its
position overlooking the Red and the Mediterranean Seas. In addition, the
existence of one of the most important international maritime corridors
ʺSuez Canalʺ which serves almost all the trade between Asia and Europe.
All these advantages allow the country to become an important point of
shipping activity with the potential to play a vital role in regional and global
integration. The next figure shows the main important ports in Egypt.
Page | 1
QUAY WALLS
• BERTH Definition
Berth is the length of the quay required for berthing of design
ship and safe handling of cargo
Page | 2
QUAY WALLS
For ages people are trying to move over water not only because they want to
explore and conquer the world, but also from an economical point of view.
Therefore, traders and conquerors were sailing the oceans. Those people
needed places to berth their ships, which later grow out to harbors. From
these developments not only a large growth of prosperity is visible, but also a
growth in knowledge about new technologies.
The oldest harbor known, is found in India near Lothal and probably dates
form4000 years ago. It is founded due to a large trade between countries in
Asia. Also in the Mediterranean, harbors were formed for trade. Alexandria
was the main trade centre in this region the last three ages before Christ.
Also the construction of harbors developed in these ages.
The Romans were the first who used a kind of concrete for the construction of
quay walls. In the middle ages the Vikings sailed the Western European waters
with very fast ships.
In this period there were two major problems: siltation of harbors and the
poor equipment available in the harbor. In general there were no quay walls of
stone and the cargo had to be transshipped by hand. Later, cranes became
available to do this work, but with these cranes the next problem raised: a
strong subsoil was needed.
This played a very important role in the development of quay walls with
vertical bearing capacity.
In the Netherlands, Amsterdam was the first place where quay walls were
constructed. In the Golden ages (1700 ac) this was the trade center of the
world.
This also gave raise to the construction of quay walls in Middelburg,
Dordrecht, Stavoren, Delft and Rotterdam.
Page | 3
QUAY WALLS
In the nineteenth century the steam engine was presented and in the
twentieth century there was a large development in the tonnage of ships.
The consequences were larger ships with a larger draught. The draught of
the ship has a lot of influence on the retaining height of the quay wall.
Another consequence is the growing possibility of self-berthing of the
ships and the extra scour due to propeller currents. Also, the method of
transshipment changed, which lead to higher loads at the quay and
consequently larger quay walls.
These developments show the struggle for the search of a good solution
for a quay wall with large retaining height, high loads and a weak subsoil.
The draughts of the ships changed from 5 m in the 17th century up to 20
meters in the nearby future.
Page | 4
QUAY WALLS
A Quay wall is a soil retaining structure, which occurs in many shapes. All
these structures have the same function.
•Mooring place for ships.
• Soil retaining function.
• Bearing capacity for crane loads, goods and storage.
• Sometimes a water retaining function.
The requirements of the quay wall show variety according to the users as for
the handling of freight, there must be a big enough storage area and that has
sufficient bearing capacity to provide future transshipment storage.
for the ships, there must be sufficient draught for the biggest vessels to
berth. In addition, the following requirements are;
• The design and construction of quay walls must be well and there must be
reasonable price quality relationship during the design and construction
stages.
• The quay should have a low maintenance requirement and a long service
lifetime.
• The area must be sufficiently elevated to remain dry at high tides.
• Water levels, tidal influences, soil characteristics of the ground and the
climatic conditions of every place in the world are different, so great deal of
experience, ingenuity and creativity should be gathered to make an
optimum design essential in the design of quay walls.
Page | 5
QUAY WALLS
Page | 6
QUAY WALLS
Gravity walls :
• Block wall
• L-walls
• Caisson walls
• Cellular walls
• Reinforced earth structure
Embedded walls :
• Cantilever Walls
• Anchored Walls
• Embedded Walls(with relieving plat form)
Open berth quay walls
• Open berth quay walls (with retanin walls)
• Open berth quay walls (with embankment)
Page | 7
QUAY WALLS
Page | 8
QUAY WALLS
Page | 9
QUAY WALLS
L-quay Walls :
Large prefabricated L-quay walls can be built in any subsoil, but it has
to be placed on a gravel or stone bed layer, and a filter from rock filling
material on the rear side should always be considered.
Page | 10
QUAY WALLS
Caisson Walls :
Page | 11
QUAY WALLS
Cellular Walls :
Page | 12
QUAY WALLS
Bulk Carrier
Passenger Berth
LNG Berth
Tanker (Single Point Mooring)
General Cargo
Deck on Piles
Diaphragm Wall
Jetty on Pile
Page | 13
QUAY WALLS
Structural
Advantages Disadvantages
Type
Page | 14
QUAY WALLS
Structural
Advantages Disadvantages
Type
maintenance.
Avoids use of steel
reinforcement, increasing
durability and longevity of the
structure. Relatively long construction
Capable of providing in excess period Heavy self weight
of100 years design life with making handling of blocks
minimal maintenance. difficult Relatively expensive
Construction in the wet is compared to other options
possible, dewatering is not Requires divers if not
Gravity required. constructed in the dry
Suitable for handling heavy Requires time and space for pre
Structure loads Low maintenance casting Can induce wave
(Mass requirements and cost reflection so preferable to
concrete No corrosion protection use only in sheltered
measures required locations Foundation
Block Suitable for resisting high(er) requires favourable
work) berthing forces Aesthetically seabed conditions
pleasing Plain faces make Production of blocks is a
for simpler incorporation of significant operation; batching
fenders and other quay and storing can occupy a large
furniture Relatively common area.
, tried and tested Setback distance required (can
Typically cheaper whole-life be used as promenade area).
cost over long term
Page | 15
QUAY WALLS
Structur
Advantages Disadvantages
al Type
Page | 16
QUAY WALLS
DESIGN CRITERIA
• Design Loads
• Type of Cargo
• Type of Handling System
• Life Time of The Berth
• Standards
Type of Loads
• Vertical Loads
◼ Surcharge Loads
• 4.0 ton/m2 for general cargo
• 6.0 ton/m2 for container terminal
• 6.0 ton/m2 for multi-purpose terminal
◼ Handling System loads
• Crane Loads (for container terminal)
• Built conveyer system
• Portal Cranes
• Loader and Un-loader system
• Horizontal Loads
◼ Earth Pressure
◼ Water Pressure Difference
◼ Side Pressure due to surcharge
◼ Berthing Forces
◼ Mooring Forces
◼ Seismic Loads
Earthquake Loads (Seismic)
• Static equivalent load method according to EAU 1990
• Factor for lateral forces is given as kh = 0.2
• Fh = M * g * 0,2
Page | 17
QUAY WALLS
Page | 18
QUAY WALLS
Loads both static and dynamic acting on block type quay walls
Page | 19
QUAY WALLS
Page | 20
QUAY WALLS
Methodology:
Conventional design methods usually require estimating the earth
pressure behind a wall and choosing the wall geometry in order to
satisfy equilibrium conditions with specified factors of safety. In
general, earth pressure acting on a vertical wall is assumed to be
active earth pressure, and is determined taking into account the
influence
of surcharge on the ground surface behind the wall and the influence
of hydraulic pressure
(due to water level difference both two sides of the wall).
The researches have shown that the inertial forces of the quay wall,
the dynamic earth and
pore water pressures generated in the backfill, and the reduction of
shear resistance at
the interface between the quay wall and the foundation soils are the
causes of wall movement
during earthquakes.
Page | 21
QUAY WALLS
Geotechnical parameters:
c : cohesion of soil (kN/m2)
φ : internal friction angle of soil (deg)
γ: unit weight of soil (kN/m3)
δ : wall friction angle (deg)
2.Geometric parameters
H : wall height (m)
β : inclined angle with the horizontal
θ : angle between the back of the wall and the vertical plane (deg)
SWL : still water level (m)
3.Load-related parameters
q : surcharge on the ground surface behind the wall (kN/m2)
kh : horizontal seismic coefficient
W: weight of the soil
where; µ is coefficient of friction between the bottom of the wall body and
the foundation, Fv is resultant vertical force acting on the wall (kN/m), Fh is
resultant horizontal force acting on the wall (kN/m), ∑Mr is the sum of the
resisting moments around the toe of the wall, ∑Mo is the sum of the
overturning moments around the toe of the wall, FSs is factor of safety
against sliding, FSo is factor of safety against overturning.
Page | 22
QUAY WALLS
crown wall
Block one
Page | 23
QUAY WALLS
Conclusion
For blockwork walls, sheet piled walls and earth reinforced jetty structures,
consideration should be given to settlement of the internal fill material and the
form of pavement to be adopted.
The design should consider the effects of berthing and mooring actions on the
structure.
Where piled structures resist lateral actions by sway, the movement of the
structure under load should be minimized when it is accessed by the public and
the dynamic response of the structure should be designed to prevent oscillation.
Allowance should be made in the design for lowering of the sea bed level by
accidental over-dredging or scour. Where appropriate, protection should be
provided against scour caused by propellers and thrusters.
The effect of jetties, especially solid structures, on the local sediment transport
regime and siltation allowances should be considered.
Other considerations include the provision of recesses along the face of the cope
for safety and access ladders, and the provisions of fendering and bollards. In
some cases, works required for these items might be integral to the cope
structure.
Page | 24
QUAY WALLS
References
1.1 Design Code for Maritime Infrastructure, Abu Dhabi.
1.2 Handbook of Port and Harbor Engineering
1.3 Port Designer’s Handbook – third edition – carl A. thoresen
1.4 MARINE STRUCTURAL DESIGN – BY YONG BAI
1.5 PORT ENGINEERING – PLANING, CONSTRUCTION,
MAINTENANCE, AND SECURITY.
Page | 25
QUAY WALLS
2- Contact Information
RAMY ADEL ZAKI
Mob +2 01093039939
TEL +2 035277448
Email: www.ramyadel.realife@gmail.com
Company Information
Position: Civil engineer, Marin constructions.
Company: Alexandria Port Authority
Address: Nasr street, Gomrok, gate no (10), Alexandria
www,apa,gov.eg
Page | 26