4 +Asmanira+Yaacob
4 +Asmanira+Yaacob
4 +Asmanira+Yaacob
2 2023
ISSN 2289-9391 / eISSN 2462-2443 (35-42)
To cite this article (APA): Yaacob, A., & Abdullah, N. (2023). Environment Education for Sustainable
Development (SD) Among Primary School Teachers. EDUCATUM Journal of Social Sciences, 9(2), 35–42.
https://doi.org/10.37134/ejoss.vol9.2.4.2023
ABSTRACT
Environment Education is a priority for sustainable development at primary school level in line with UNESCO to
produce citizens with sustainable lifestyles. This study aims to identify the level of knowledge, attitude and
practice/behaviour among primary school teachers regarding the environmental education for sustainable
development. It then also analysed the relationship between the level of knowledge, attitude and practice/behavior
of sustainable development. Data were obtained quantitatively through a questionnaire survey where 300 teachers
were randomly selected to be involved in this survey. The result showed that the level of knowledge of sustainable
development among primary school teachers is high with the mean value of 3.80. The level of attitude sustainable
development is also at a high level with the mean at 3.70 meanwhile the level of practice/behavior, sustainable
development at moderate level with the mean of 3.25. This study also revealed that there is a strong and significant
relationship between the level of knowledge and attitude of sustainable development primary school teachers with
r -value at 0.765. There is a weak correlation between the level of teacher’s attitude and their practice/behavior
with r -value at 0.455. It clearly showed that higher knowledge influences the attitudes of primary school teachers
for sustainable development. At the other point, higher knowledge and attitude is not a guarantee towards positive
practice/behavior for sustainable development among primary school teachers. This situation needs improvement
and an effective way to produce today's generation that loves their environment and nature. Teachers as an
educator became a front liner group for making sure environment education is successful at primary school level.
Keywords Environment Education, Sustainable, Development, Primary School Teachers, Knowledge, Attitude,
Practice/Behavior
INTRODUCTION
The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) is now widely regarded as a blueprint
for a more peaceful world meanwhile Malaysia has included the SDGs into the 11th Malaysia Plan,
which includes education. There are two main streams of environmental education worldwide:
Environmental Education (EE) and Education for Sustainable Development (ESD). ESD is a formal
obligation and as such is promoted by the United Nations to ensure sustainable development in
countries. In contrast, EE is the first educational trend to adopt an environmentally friendly approach
(Pedro, 2021). Since the concept of sustainable development was put forward, it has gone through
different stages of development. Various organizations and institutions have been involved in the
historical development of the concept and are now focusing on implementing its principles and
objectives (Tomislav, 2018). Knowledge about how to implement sustainable activities helps
35
Environment Education for Sustainable Development (SD) Among Primary School Teachers
PROBLEM STATEMENTS
Malaysia now has a bigger need than ever for education for sustainable development (ESD), as the
country faces growing environmental issues. However, ESD has yet to be adequately defined in the
educational scene (Pravindharan, 2021). Despite the fact that these issues are visible, people continue
to engage in environmentally unfriendly behaviour at the individual, governmental, and society levels.
The fast expansion of environmental problems causes the extinction of numerous species, causing the
ecological balance to deteriorate. Despite the fact that a human being is not independent of its habitat
and ecosystem, individuals continue to pollute the environment as if they were living outside of it
(Evrim Ural & Guzide Dadli, 2020).
The existing educational system does not address the global environmental problem, and the
current environmental catastrophe reflects the contemporary environmental education dilemma
(Sivaraman et al.,2019). Ecological sustainability has become an integral part of societies and
organisations. In response, many organizations have tended to ensure that their day-to-day operations
are less harmful to the environment by implementing environmental management systems (EMS) or
green initiatives. These initiatives include reducing carbon emissions such as B. reducing consumption
of electricity and office supplies; and consciously recycling materials appropriately (Olawole et
al.,2019).
One of the objectives of environmental education is to shape environmental values. This also
raises issues regarding the distinction between education and indoctrination. Although values education
has received a lot of attention from a variety of theoretical angles, there is research that has examined
how it is actually implemented (Jan et al., 2020). Current environmental issues require a shift in
educational focus to develop students' environmental awareness and positive attitudes towards the
environment. There is evidence that education has a positive impact on students' environmental
awareness (Pauline et al.,2018).
OBJECTIVE
The purpose of this study has been following specific research objectives, which are:
METHODOLOGY
This study applied a survey research design with a quantitative approach. The method for collecting the
data by distributing questionnaires using form and google form. This study focuses on primary school
36
EDUCATUM – Journal of Social Science (EJOSS), Vol.9 No.2 2023
ISSN 2289-9391 / eISSN 2462-2443 (35-42)
teachers in Bentong Pahang Malaysia. Based on Education Statistics of Malaysia (MOE2018) the total
number of primary school teachers in Bentong, Pahang is 1997. The sample size has been stipulated
based on the Krejcie and Morgan sample size determination table. Based on the table, the teacher sample
size needed in this study is approximately 322. However, this study had been conducted with a sample
size of 300 respondents, while the selection of respondents using a simple random sampling technique
involving 150 teachers from urban schools and 150 teachers from rural schools.
The questionnaires are divided into 4 sections, section A presents on the demographic
background information of the teacher while section B contains questions Sustainable Development
Knowledge 12 items, section C contains questions Sustainable Development Attitude 14 items and
section D contains questions Sustainable Development Behaviour/Practice 27 items which used a 5-
point Likert scale. The scales range from 1 = strongly disagree, 2 = disagree, 3 = not sure, 4 = agree
and 5 = strongly agree. The questionnaires were adapted from previous studies.
Data analysis using Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS) version 23. The statistical
analysis applied are descriptive statistics which are frequency, mean, standard deviation and inferential
statistics and correlation to achieve research objectives.
RESULTS
Section A is teachers’ demographic background information. The items focus on two demographic
aspects: school location and gender. The results are tabulated in Table 1. Table 1 shows the frequency
distribution of respondents’ demographic. The total number of respondent teachers from urban and rural
schools is equal. In terms of gender, there are 131 male teachers (43.7 percent) and 169 female teachers
(56.3 percent). The teachers in the primary school of MOE district found teaching in two different
locations, namely urban primary school (150 respondents) (50%) and rural primary school (150
respondents) (50%) and sampling techniques were used.
Percentage
Item Sub Item Frequency
(%)
Urban 150 50
School location
Rural 150 50
Male 131 43.7
Gender
Female 169 56.3
Table 2 shows reliability of sustainable development knowledge, sustainable development attitude and
sustainable development practice with Cronbach’s Alpha value. According to Sekaran (2003),
reliability is used to measure the consistency and stability of the variables. The closer reliability
coefficient close to 1.00, the better instruments in general, where reliability less than 0.60 are considered
poor, those over 0.80 are good while 0.90 are excellent (Sekaran, 2003). The result of the analysis
showed the Cronbach Alpha values are excellent and suitable as a research instrument.
To facilitate interpretation of the level of teachers’ knowledge, attitude and practice, the cut-off points
by Landell (1997) show at Table 3.
37
Environment Education for Sustainable Development (SD) Among Primary School Teachers
Scale Level
Score 1.00-2.33 Low
Score 2.34-3.66 Medium
Score 3.67-5.00 High
38
EDUCATUM – Journal of Social Science (EJOSS), Vol.9 No.2 2023
ISSN 2289-9391 / eISSN 2462-2443 (35-42)
39
Environment Education for Sustainable Development (SD) Among Primary School Teachers
DISCUSSIONS
The level of the teacher's sustainable development knowledge and the result show that the overall level
of all variables was high with the value mean 3.79. This indicates that the level of teachers’ sustainable
development knowledge at primary school was good and satisfactory. This finding in line with Ozkan
and Bulent (2017), high knowledge about environmental education among teachers is really important,
from their knowledge to produce positive environmental behaviour.
The level of teachers’ sustainable development attitude, the finding shows that the overall
variables were high with mean values within the range of 3.699 to 3.705. This result shows that primary
school teachers' attitude towards sustainable development was at a satisfactory level. These results in
line with Ajaz (2017) stated that the majority of the teachers have a positive attitude towards
environmental education and a sustainable development attitude really needed for educators.
The result of the teachers’ level of sustainable development practices at medium level with
mean 3.25. The finding, in line with Farah and Kamariah (2019), stated the teachers’ sustainable
practices still not at a satisfactory level, so effort for sustainable practices through education needed to
be consistent and continuous.
The analysis correlation between teachers’ sustainable development knowledge, attitude and
practice. This study also revealed that there is a strong and significant relationship between the level of
knowledge and attitude of sustainable development primary school teachers with r -value at 0.765.
There is a weak correlation between the level of teacher attitude and their practice/behavior with r -
value at 0.455.
First correlation between sustainable development knowledge and sustainable development
attitude, the findings show a strong relationship that values r (300) = .765, p < .01. Lastly, correlation
between sustainable development attitude to sustainable development practice showed a weak
relationship with value r (300) = .455, p > .01. This finding is in line with Zheng, Xu, Deng and Lin
(2017), that positive correlation between knowledge and attitude is really needed so that environment
quality can be improved and increased.
The research respondents come from primary school teachers from Bentong, Pahang. This
study’s finding shows that environmental education is a priority to all teachers so that teachers can
apply the education well to pupils. This study’s findings may impact the real scenario in the teaching
and learning process among teachers and pupils in the classroom. Teachers have high scores on
knowledge and attitude so this finding is a milestone from the start. This study’s findings also show
disappointment at teacher’s development of sustainable practice where the result is a moderate score.
The practice is important to make sure that we can control the environmental problem.
40
EDUCATUM – Journal of Social Science (EJOSS), Vol.9 No.2 2023
ISSN 2289-9391 / eISSN 2462-2443 (35-42)
Moreover, teachers can improve their practice skills at the school with their pupils, so in the
meantime the dream of successful implementation of environment education at primary school can be
realized. This focus is in line with UNESCO and the Ministry of Education that environment education
must be taught in all subjects at primary level.
CONCLUSION
The results of this study show that for general sustainability knowledge, energy saving and
sustainability environment attitudes were at high levels, while sustainability practices energy saving
were still at medium levels. This means that the teachers’ needed to know well their responsibility as
educators being main components towards acceptance and implementation of environmental education
at primary school.
Direct education is the most effective method across many parties' efforts to improve the
quality of the environment. Long-term knowledge of environmental preservation will be more
acceptable when a systematic and continuous method is implemented. Teachers in reality play a
significant role as change agents and their actions and attitudes have a major effect on learners. Through
use of competition to implement education for sustainable development is a form of encouragement for
the school community to keep up the good work on education for sustainable development. Education
field must be an effective way to produce a new generation full of positive knowledge, attitude, values,
awareness, behaviour and practice for concern about our environment. Healthy environment gives a
healthy life for humankind. So, let's love our environment together.
REFERENCES
Akman, O. & Alagoz, B. (2017). A Study on Environment - Oriented Knowledge, Attitude and Behavior Level
of Teacher Candidates. Journal of Education and Practice 8(7).
Corina, J., Yussri Sawani., Tamoi Janggu., Rashinah Hossen., & Patrick Atan. (2021). Development of a
Sustainable Development Goals Disclosure Index (SDGDi) for Malaysian Local Authorities. IPN
Journal of Research and Practice in Public Sector Accounting and Management, 11(1), 61 – 79.
Crystal, J. P., Wilfredo, H. L., Nor Fadila Amin., Adibah Abdul Latif, & Mahyuddin Arsat. (2018). Preliminary
Research on Sustainable Development Integration in Malaysian University. International Journal of
Pure and Applied Mathematics, 118(24).
Dwi Purwanti, Gunarhadi & Akhmad Arif Musadad. (2019). The Effect of Local-Based 2013 Curriculum
Implementation on Students’ Environmental Awareness. International Journal of Educational Research
Review,4(1),65-75.
Evrim, U., & Guzide, D. (2020). The Effect of Problem-based Learning on 7th-grade Students’ Environmental
Knowledge, Attitudes, and Reflective Thinking Skills in Environmental Education. Journal of Education
in Science, Environment and Health, 6(3).
Farah Izyan Raman & Kamariah Abu Bakar. (2019). Amalan Kelestarian Alam Sekitar Dalam Kalangan Guru
Prasekolah. GEOGRAFIA Malaysian Journal of Society and Space,15(2), 15-30).
Florianna, L. M., Helmi Sumilan., Nur Fatihah A. Bandar., Hana Hamidi., Victoria J., & Nik Norsyamimi Md
Nor. (2020). Sustainable Development Concept Awareness Among Students in Higher Education: A
Preliminary Study. Journal of Sustainability Science and Management 15(7), 113-122.
Glenda, C., Graeme, A., Munir Shuib., Asyirah Abdul Rahim., Siti Norbaya Azizan & Mohammad Izzamil Mohd
Nasi. (2020). The Teaching of Sustainability in Higher Education: Improving Environmental Resilience
in Malaysia. Introduction to Sustainable Development Leadership and Strategies in Higher Education
Innovations in Higher Education Teaching and Learning, 22, 17–38.
Haein, S., & Srinivas, A. (2021). Educators’ Perspectives on Environmental Education in India. A Case Study in
School and Informal Education Settings
Hanifah Mahat & Shaharudin Idrus. (2016). Education for Sustainable Development in Malaysia: A Study of
Teacher and Student Awareness. Malaysian Journal of Society and Space, 12(6), 77 – 88.
Hanifah Mahat, Mohmadisa Hashim, Yazid Saleh, Mohamad Suhaily Yusri Che Ngah & Nasir Nayan. (2016).
Critical Aspects of Sustainable Development in Education: Data Based on Teacher Interview.
EDUCATUM – Journal of Social Science, 2, 52-66.
41
Environment Education for Sustainable Development (SD) Among Primary School Teachers
Jan, C., Bruce, J., Roman, K., & Petra, S. (2020). Values Education in Outdoor Environmental Education
Programs from the Perspective of Practitioners. Sustainability, 12.
Kuok, H. D. T. (2018). Correlation Between Sustainability Education and Engineering Students’ Attitudes
Towards Sustainability. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 19(3), 459-472.
Krejcie, R.V. & Morgan, D.W. (1910). Determining Sample Size for Research Activities. Educational and
Psychological Measurement, 30: 607-610.
Norazizah Abdul Rahman., Norakmal Mohd Yusop., & Rozidawati Awang. (2021). The Effect of Project on
Children Attitude Toward Environmental Balance. Hungarian Educational Research Journal 11(4),
426–439.
Olawole Fawehinmi., Mohd Yusoff Yusliza., Zaleha Mohamad., Juhari Noor Faezah., & Zikri Muhammad.
(2019). Assessing the Green Behaviour of Academics: The Role of Green Human Resource
Management and Environmental Knowledge. International Journal of Manpower, 41 (7)
Pauline., N. D. P., Aphrodite M. M., & Nico., N. L. (2018). Environmental Awareness and Pro-Environmental
Behaviors of High School Students in Los Baños, Laguna. Journal of Nature Studies 17(1).
Pravindharan Balakrishnan. (2021). Challenges and Strategies for ESD in the Malaysian Education System.
Pedro, M. A. C. (2021). From Environmental Education to Education for Sustainable Development in Higher
Education: A Systematic Review. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 23(3),
622-644.
Ramsey, C. E., & Rickson, R. E. (1976). Environmental Knowledge and Attitudes. Journal of Environmental
Education, 8(11), 10–18.
Sachi, N. L., Jinyoung., K., Changhwan, K., & Sabrina, H. A. (2019). Environmental Education in Higher
Education Institutes in Asia - Overview of Experiences in South Korea, Malaysia, and Japan. Japanese
Journal of Environmental Education, 28(4).
Sekaran U. (2003). Research Method for Business, A Skill Building Approach Fourth Edition. New York, NY;
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
Sivaraman Kuppusamy., Mohd Faris Khamidi., Tamil Salvi Mari., & Xia, S. L. (2019). Environmental Literacy
Level among Architecture Students in Private Universities, Klang Valley, Malaysia.
Sohaib Sultan., Shehzad Ahmed., & Muhammad Imran. (2020). Awareness Regarding Environmental Education:
A Qualitative Study Suggesting Practical Steps in Education Leading to a Green Pakistan. Global Social
Sciences Review, V(I), 510-518.
Sulzakimin Mohamed., Tan. W. S., & Md Asrul N. Masrom. (2016). Sustainable Development at Malaysian Local
Governments from Management's View of the Knowledge Transfer Practices. Fourth International
Conference on Sustainable Environment.
Tomislav Klarin. (2018). The Concept of Sustainable Development: From its Beginning to the Contemporary
Issues. Zagreb International Review of Economics & Business, 21(1), 67-94.
Yodsaphon, W., Pram, I., & Wee, R. (2020). Environmental Education Competency: Enhancing the Work of
Teachers. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 22(2), 140-152.
Zheng, Q. J., Xu, A.X., Kong, D.Y, Deng, H.P., & Lin, Q. Q. (2017). Applied Ecology and Environment Research,
16(11), 51-62.
42