Mob Unit V
Mob Unit V
Mob Unit V
Group Dynamics
Group Dynamics: Types of Groups, Stages of Group Development, Group Behaviour, and
Group Performance Factors, Organizational conflicts: Reasons for Conflicts, Consequences of
Conflicts in Organization, Types of Conflicts, Strategies for Managing Conflicts,
Organizational Climate and Culture, Stress, Causes and effects, coping strategies of stress.
Group Dynamics-Introduction
Definition:
Meaning and Definitions of Group Dynamics
The term ‘group dynamics’ means the study of forces within a group. Since human beings have
an innate desire for belonging to a group, group dynamism is bound to occur. In an organization
or in a society, we can see groups, small or large, working for the well-being.
The social process by which people interact with one another in small groups can be called
group dynamism. A group has certain common objectives & goals. Because of which members
are bound together with certain values and cultures.
Types of groups
There are two types of groups an individual forms. They are formal groups and informal
groups. Let us know about these two groups.
Formal Groups
These are the type of work groups created by the organization and have designated work
assignments and rooted tasks. The behavior of such groups is directed toward achieving
organizational goals.
These can be further classified into two sub-groups −
Command group – This group consists of individuals who report directly to the manager.
Interest group − It is a group formed by individuals working together to achieve a specific
objective. Example − A group of workers working on a project and reporting to the same
manager is considered as a command group. A group of friends chilling out together is
considered as interest group or say members of a club.
Informal Groups
These groups are formed with friendships and common interests. These can be further
classified into two sub-groups −
Task group − Those working together to finish a job or task is known as task group.
Friendship group − Those brought together because of their shared interests or common
characteristics is known as friendship group.
Stages of Group Development
There are 5 stages of group development. They are
Forming.
Storming.
Norming.
Performing.
Adjourning.
Forming
The first stage of group development is known as the forming stage. The forming stage
represents a time where the group is just starting to come together and is characterized by
anxiety and uncertainty.
Members are cautious with their behavior, which is driven by the desire to be accepted by all
members of the group. The focus for group members during the forming stage is to become
familiar with each other and their purpose, not on work.
Typical outcomes of the forming stage include things like gaining an understanding of the
group’s purpose, determining how the team will be organized and who will be responsible for
what, discussing milestones or phases of the group’s goal, outlining general group rules and
discovery of what resources will be available for the group to use.
Storming
The second stage of group development is known as the storming stage. The storming stage is
where conflict and competition are at its greatest. This is because now that group members
have an understanding of the task and a general feel for who they are as a group, they feel
confident and begin to address some of the more important issues surrounding the group.
The storming stage is where the more dominant of the group members emerge, while other,
less confrontational members stay in the comfort and security of suppressing their feelings just
as they did in the previous stage.
All members have an increased need for clarification. Questions surrounding leadership,
authority, rules, responsibilities, structure, evaluation criteria and reward systems tend to arise
during the storming stage.
Norming
Once a group receives the clarity that it so desperately needs, it can move on to the third stage
of group development, known as the norming stage.
The norming stage is the time where the group becomes a cohesive unit. Morale is high as
group members actively acknowledge the talents, skills and experience that each member
brings to the group. A sense of community is established and the group remains focused on the
group’s purpose and goal. Members are flexible, interdependent and trust each other.
Leadership is shared, and members are willing to adapt to the needs of the group. Information
flows seamlessly and is uninhibited due to the sense of security members feel in the norming
stage.
Performing
At its peak, the group moves into the fourth stage of group development, known as the
performing stage. The performing stage is marked by high productivity.
Group members are unified, loyal and supportive. Competence in all members is seen, allowing
for a high level of autonomy in decision making. Problem solving, experimentation and testing
possible solutions are high as group members are focused on task completion and achievement.
The overall objective of the group during the performing stage is to complete their mission.
Adjourning
For permanent work groups, performing is the last stage in their development.
However, for temporary committees, teams, task forces, and similar groups that have a limited
task to perform, there is an adjourning stage.
Even the most successful groups, committees, and project teams disband sooner or later. Their
breakup is called adjournment, which requires dissolving intense social relations and returning
to permanent assignments.
The adjournment stage is becoming even more frequent with the advent of flexible
organizations, which feature temporary groups.
Group Behavior
Individuals form groups. They live in groups. They move in groups. They work in groups.
Groups are important. They influence work and work behavior. They cannot be ignored. They
exert a significant influence on the organization. They are inseparable from the organization.
They are useful for the organization. They form the foundation of human resources. The study
of group behavior is important. Individual and group behavior differs from each other. Group
behavior affects productivity
The importance of group behavior has been realized from time to time. Elton Mayo and his
associate’s way back in 1920 conducted the famous Hawthorne experiments and came to know
that the group behaviour have a major impact on productivity.
At the workplace, whenever, two or more persons interact, conflict occurs when opinions
with respect to any task or decision are in contradiction.
A common example of organizational conflict occurs when workers advocate for higher pay
and the business owner or management wants pay levels to remain the same.
1. Unclear Responsibility: If there is lack of clarity, regarding who is responsible for which
section of a task or project, conflict takes place. And, to avoid this situation, the roles and
responsibility of the team members should be stated clearly and also agreed upon by all.
2. Interpersonal Relationship: Conflicts at the workplace are often caused by interpersonal
issues between the members of the organization. Every member of an organization
possesses different personality, which plays a crucial role in resolving conflict in an
organization.
3. Scarcity of Resources: One of the main reasons for occurrence of conflict in an
organization is the inadequacy of resources like time, money, materials etc. due to which
members of the organization compete with each other, leading to conflict between them.
4. Conflict of Interest: When there is a disorientation between the personal goals of the
individual and the goals of the organization, conflict of interest arises, as the individual
may fight for his personal goals, which hinders the overall success of the project.
1. Intra-individual/Intra-personal Conflict
Conflict can be intra-personal, where an individual’s objective and vision differs from
his/her company’s overall vision.
Intrapersonal conflict occurs within an individual. The experience takes place in the
person’s mind. Hence, it is a type of conflict that is psychological involving the
individual’s thoughts, values, principles and emotions.
For example, a secretary may have to lie on instructions that her boss is not in the office
to avoid an unwanted visitor or an unwanted telephone call. This may cause a conflict
within the mind of the secretary who may have developed an ethic of telling the truth.
In addition to these value conflicts, a person may be faced with a role conflict. For
example, a police officer may be invited to his brother’s wedding where he may find that
some guests are using drugs which are against the law. It may cause conflict in his mind
as to which role he should play – as of a brother or as of a police officer.
2. Inter-personal conflict
Interpersonal conflict is the conflict between two individuals of the organization.
Basically, this occurs because of some differences in people. We have varied
personalities which usually lead to incompatible choices and opinions.
This may involve conflict between two managers who are competing for limited capital
and manpower resources.
Another type of interpersonal conflict can relate to disagreements over goals and
objectives of the organization. A college or a university may have a policy of quality
education so that only top quality students are admitted while some members of the
organizational board may propose an “open admission” policy where all high school
graduates are to be considered for admission. Such asituation can cause conflicts among
the members of the governing board.
3. Intra-group Conflict
Intragroup conflict occurs among individuals within a team. These are conflicts that
typically involve more than one person within a group. The incompatibilities and
misunderstandings between team members lead to intragroup conflict. It starts from
interpersonal disagreements like team members have different personalities which may
lead to tension or differences in views and ideas.
For example, in some restaurants, all tips are shared equally by all waiters and waitresses.
Some particular waitress who may be overly polite and efficient may feel that she
deserves more, thus causing conflict between her and the group.
Similarly, if a group is going on strike for some reasons, some members of the group
may not agree with these reasons or simply may not be economically able to afford to go
on strike, thus causing conflict with the group.
4. Inter-group conflict
Intergroup conflict occurs when a misunderstanding arises among different teams within
an organization.
This is due to the varied sets of goals and interests of these different groups. In addition,
competition also contributes for intergroup conflict to arise. There are other factors
which fuel this type of conflict. Some of these factors may include a rivalry in resources
or the boundaries set by a group to others which establishes their own identity as a team.
For example, sales people who depend upon their commission as a reward for their
efforts may promise their customers certain quantity of the product and delivery times
which the production department may find impossible to meet thus causing conflict
between the two units.
5. Inter-organizational Conflict
When different businesses are competing against one another, this is an example of inter-
organizational conflict.
Conflict also occurs between organizations which are dependent upon each other in some
way. This conflict may be between buyer organizations and supplier organizations about
quantity, quality and delivery times of raw materials and other policy issues.
1. Latent Stage: In the “Latent Stage,” the first stage in the five stages of conflict,
people may be in conflict without being aware that they are in conflict. An
example of this could be that a server at a restaurant may have inputted an order
incorrectly and the food being made for a table is the wrong food. The manager
and table do not know this yet and conflict has not arisen yet.
2. Perceived Stage: The “Perceived Stage” is when the people involved in a conflict
become fully aware that there is a conflict, so the table has now been made aware
and complained to management. Management will now go over to speak with
the employee about it.
3. Felt Stage: During the “Felt Stage” stress and anxiety are felt by one or more of
the participants due to the conflict, the manager does not enjoy causing conflict
and the employee does not enjoy being under scrutiny.
4. Manifest: This will undoubtedly lead to the “Manifest Stage,” during which the
conflict can be observed. The Manifest Stage can take a number of shapes
including: e-mails, phone calls, phone messages, face-to-face meetings, or any
situation in which the conflict could be observed. When the manager pulls the
employee aside to speak with him or her, others perceive the conflict and it has
manifested.
5. Aftermath: The final stage is the “Aftermath Stage,” which takes place when
there is some outcome of the conflict, such as a resolution to, or dissolution of,
the problem. When the manager corrects the mistake with the customer and takes
appropriate steps to ensure the server is more careful in the future.
Conflict resolution
Conflict resolution is a way for two or more parties to find a peaceful solution to a
disagreement among them.
From a conflict resolution perspective, conflicts can and must be resolved bytaking into
account the needs of the people affected by the conflict. In other words, for a solution to
be lasting, it must meet the needs of all those involved in the conflict.
A solution, in which one party’s needs are met at the expense of the needs of the other
party, is neither just nor likely to last for a long.
Resolving a conflict ends the dispute by satisfying the interests of both parties. Successful
conflict resolution depends on the ability to regulate stress and emotions.
During conflict, strong emotions appear which can hurt feelings. When a person deals
with a conflict in a healthy way, it increases understanding among people, builds trust
and strengthens relationships
Conflict resolution is only a five-step process:
Step 1: Identify the source of the conflict. The more information we have about the cause
of the conflict, the more easily we can help to resolve it. To get the information we need,
use a series of questions to identify the cause, like, “Howdid this incident begin?”
As a manager or supervisor, we need to give both parties the chance to share their side
of the story. It will give us a better understanding of the situation.
Step 2: Look beyond the incident. The source of the conflict might be a minor problem
that occurred months before, but the level of stress has grown to the point where the two
parties have begun attacking each other personally instead of addressing the real
problem. In the calm of our office, we can get them to look beyond the triggering incident
to see the real cause. Once again, probing questions will help.
Step 3: Request solutions. After getting each party’s viewpoint on the conflict, thenext
step is to get each to identify how the situation could be changed. Again, question the
parties to solicit their ideas: “How can you make things better between you?”
Step 4: Identify solutions both disputants can support. We are listening for the most
acceptable course of action. Point out the merits of various ideas, not only from each
other’s perspective, but in terms of the benefits to the organization. For instance, we
might point to the need for greater cooperation and collaboration to effectively address
team issues and departmental problems.
Step 5: Agreement. The mediator needs to get the two parties to shake hands andagree to
one of the alternatives identified in Step 4. Some mediators go as far as to write up a
contract in which actions and time frames are specified.
Conflict Resolution Strategy
1: Avoiding
Avoiding is when people just ignore or withdraw from the conflict. They choose this
method when the discomfort of confrontation exceeds the potential reward of resolution
of the conflict. While this might seem easy to accommodate for the facilitator, people
aren’t really contributing anything of value to the conversation and may be withholding
worthwhile ideas. When conflict is avoided, nothing is resolved.
2: Competing
Competing is used by people who go into a conflict planning to win. They’re assertive
and not cooperative. This method is characterized by the assumption that one side wins
and everyone else loses. It doesn’t allow room for diverse perspectives into a well
informed total picture. Competing might work in sports or war, but it’s rarely a good
strategy for group problem solving.
3: Accommodating
Accommodating is a strategy where one party gives in to the wishes or demands of
another. They’re being cooperative but not assertive. This may appear to be a gracious
way to give in when one figures out s/he has been wrong about an argument. It’s less
helpful when one party accommodates another merely to preserve harmony or to avoid
disruption. Like avoidance, it can result in unresolved issues. Too much accommodation
can result in groups where the most assertive parties commandeer the process and take
control of most conversations.
4: Collaborating
Collaborating is the method used when people are both assertive and cooperative. A
group may learn to allow each participant to make a contribution with the possibility of
co-creating a shared solution that everyone can support.
5: Compromising
Another strategy is compromising, where participants are partially assertive and
cooperative. The concept is that everyone gives up a little bit of what they want, and no
one gets everything they want. The perception of the best outcome when working by
compromise is that which “splits the difference.” Compromise is perceived as being fair,
even if no one is particularly happy with the final outcome.
Organizational Climate
Organizational climate entails an organization's unique culture, which can create a distinct
atmosphere surrounding all organizational members. An organizational climate implies the
values and perceptions of organizational members regarding their organization and work
environment.
Various experiences and interactions can determine an organizational climate. For example,
we can build an organizational climate on the frequency managers are willing to help their
employees at work, how managers and peers treat specific individuals, etc.
Importance of Organizational Climate
A positive and unique organizational climate can be critical to every company.
First, an organizational climate can assist companies in measuring their employees' perceptions
about various business-related aspects such as work environments, policies, regulations,
business practices, communication patterns, etc. For instance, businesses can measure their
organizational climate to gauge how their employees feel and think about their policies,
organizational culture, or practices. Thus, the management team can ensure that organizational
members align with the organization's goals, visions, and strategies.
Second, similar to organizational culture, an organizational climate can create a common
ground of beliefs and perceptions to which all organizational members belong. In this sense,
the organizational climate can enhance organizational commitment, which tightens the bond
between employees and their organizations.
Studies have shown that the happier employees are, the higher their productivity is, and
therefore, the more successful the overall organizational performance gets. Thereby, by having
a good organizational climate that employees feel happy to work for, organizations can
indirectly influence their business performance for the better.
Types of Organizational Climate
There are, indeed, several types of organizational climates at work. The following are some
most prominent types of organizational climates nowadays.
Types
Human-centric climate
An organizational climate that emphasizes the importance of caring for each other.
Rule-oriented climate
An organizational climate that prioritizes compliance with organizational rules and regulations
for every organizational member.
Innovation-oriented climate
An organizational climate that focuses on implementing innovative working styles and
processes to foster creativity and innovativeness at work.
Goal-oriented climate
An organizational climate that is result-driven. Thus, this organizational climate emphasizes
the realization of organizational values and perfectionism to attain desirable business
outcomes.