Marsland 1989
Marsland 1989
SPE 18480
This paper was prepared for presentation at the SPE International Symposium on Oilfield Chemistry in Houston, TX, February 8-10, 1989.
This paper was selected for presentation by an SPE Program Committee following review of information contained in an abstract submitted by the author(s).
Contents of the paper, as presented, have not been reviewed by the Society of Petroleum Engineers and are subject to correction by the author(s). The
material, as presented, does not necessarily reflect any position of the Society of Petroleum Engineers, its officers, or members. Papers presented at
SPE meetings are subject to publication review by Editorial Committees of the Society of Petroleum Engineers. Permission to copy is restricted to an
abstract of not more than 300 words. Illustrations may not be copied. The abstract should contain conspicuous acknowledgment of where and by whom
the paper is presented. Write Publications Manager, SPE, P.O. Box 833836, Richardson, TX 75083·3836. Telex, 730989 SPEDAL.
concentration based on: believed that the possible inorganic reactions caused by changing
the nature of the reservoir environment are the source of HzS
1) Preparing pure iron sulphides of known stoichiometry and generation. It is known that North Sea reservoir formations
homogeneity contain mineral sulphides, and in particular iron sulphides of the
2) Using generated thermodynamics diagrams to predict the form FeS, FeS 1_x and FeS 2• The reaction of these materials with
behaviour of the iron-sulphur-water system at any required acidic components coming either from the injection water on
conditions relevant to the reservoirs breakthrough, or degradation species from injected components,
such as biocides and corrosion and scale inhibitors will cause
hydrogen sulphide generation. To understand and be able to
control the above reactions it is necessary to monitor the kinetics
~~~:--;::~----;-:'~----:------=---~---::--=---------I and mechanisms of such reactions.
* References and illustrations are at the end of the paper
201
2. INORGANIC CHEMICAL SOURING OF OIL RESERVOIRS SPE 18480
This paper provides the information necessary to show that the The dissolution rate is dependant upon the concentration of
generation of hydrogen sulphide by the non-oxidative dissolution iron (II) ions in solution. The variation seen in the composition of
of iron sulphides within high temperature, high pressure and high formation waters, shows that it is important to have an
ionic concentration reservoirs is a feasible mechanism. understanding as to what role, if any, cations and anions in solution
will have upon the rate of dissolution.
v) Redox potential of solution and mineral surface potential
Within the reservoir the formation will be at a potential which
Background is sensitive to external conditions. It is therefore important to
Leaching of sulphide minerals may occur naturally, or as a unit establish the history of the change in potential of a reservoir and
process in the hydrometallurgical extraction processes from ores the effect this has upon the stability of iron sulphides.
and concentrates. It involves one of three types of reaction:
vi) Initial surface area
i) non-oxidative dissolution:
The form and distribution of the iron sulphides present in the
MS +2/J+ ~ M 2 + +H2S (1) reservoir is important, because the initial rates of dissolution are
controlled by the stoichiometry of the FeS surface.
ii) oxidative dissolution:
MS +4H20 +xO ~M 2 + +So;- +8H+ +xR (2)
It is apparent that the rate of dissolution is dependant upon the The third zone is where microbial fermentation can take place.
hydrogen ion concentration, however, it is important to know the Here organic matter is broken down, methane being one of the
order of the reaction with respect to [H+]. products, with an increase in acidity and Hco:; activity. Continuing
reduction of available Fe20 3 will produce iron carbonate minerals.
ii) Partial pressure of H 2S
In the fourth zone excess iron (Fe 20 3 ) is reduced and excess
If the dissolution is chemically controlled then the rate is carboxylates eventually undergo dissolution to carbonates.
retarded due to the promotion of the reverse reaction in equation 1,
or due to the possible adsorption of ~S on the mineral surface. The final zone is where liquid hydrocarbon generation takes
place. Here there is the possibility of increased acidity due to C02
iii) Temperature
generation from organic matter. The residual pore waters will
An estimate of the effect of temperature on the rate of reaction probably be maintained at an acidic pH.
can be obtained from the Arrhenius equation.
The presence of iron sulphides within the formation is iikely to
iv) Anions and cations in solution occur as small nodules (of the order of a few tens of micrometres
202
SPE 18480 S.D. MARSLAND, R.A. DAWE, G.H. KELSALL 3.
(8)
203
4. INORGANIC CHEMICAL SOURING OF OIL RESERVOIRS SPE 18480
Conclusions
(10)
1. Hydrogen sulphide souring of originally sweet oil can be by
where aA,+ is the activity of the silver ions. This may be related to inorganic chemical means.
the sulphide ion activity by the solubility product of silver
2. The most probable method of inorganic chemical souring of
sulphide, K., =a:,•.a5 a-. as:
North Sea oil reservoirs is by the non-oxidative dissolution of
reservoir formation iron sulphides, FeS, Fe1_xS and FeS 1.x·
(11)
3. The technique of using a R.R.D.E. with the disc fabricated from
The constant E"" includes a term for the solubility product KIP. synthesised iron sulphides of known stoichiometry is the most
The concentration of an ion is related to its activity by: suitable method for determining the mechanism and kinetics of
non-oxidative dissolution of iron sulphides.
(12)
204
SPE 18480 S.D. MARSLAND, R.A. DAWE, G.H. KELSALL 5.
9. Postgate J.R., "The Sulphate-Reducing Bacteria", Cambridge 23. Romankov L.T. and de Bruyn P.L., "Kinetics of Dissolution
University Press, (1979). of Zinc Sulfide in Aqueous Sulfuric Acid", Unit Operations in
10. Society of Petroleum Engineers, "Produced Water Hydrometallurgy, Gordon and Breach, 1965, pp.45.
Problems", Continuing Education Seminar, Aberdeen Section, 24. Majima H., Awakura Y. and Misaki N., "A Kinetic Study on
14th May 1987. Nonoxidative Dissolution of Sphalerite in Aqueous
11. Stott J .F .D. and King R.A., "Petroleum Reservoir Souring in Hydrochloric Acid Solutions", Met.Trans., 12B (1981)
the North Sea", Capcis, UMIST. 645-649.
25. Nicol M.J., "The Non-Oxidative Leaching of Oxides and
12. Surinach P.P., "A New Concept of Treating Surfaces Sulphides: An Electrochemical Approach", Council for
Exposed to Oilfield Water Systems", SPE Paper N!-16262. Mineral Technology, Randburg, 2125, South Africa.
13. Cochrane, W.J., Jones; P.S. Sanders, Holt, D.M. and 26. Nicol M.J, and Scott P.D., "The Kinetics and Mechanism of
Moseley, M.J., "Studies on the Thermophilic' the Non-Oxidative Dissolution of some Iron Sulphides in
Sulfate-Reducing Bacteria from a Souring North Sea Oil Aqueous Acidic Solutions", J.South African Inst.Min.Met., 79
Field", SPE Paper N!!.18368, 1988. (1979) 298-305.
14. Bourgeois J.P., Aupaix N., Bloise R. and Millet J.L.,
"Proposition D'Explication de la Formation d'Hydrogene 27. Pourbaix M., "Atlas of Electrochemical Equilibria in
Sulfure dans les Stockages Souterrains de Gaz Nature! par Aqueous Solutions", Pergamon Press Ltd., (1966).
Reduction des Sulfures Mineraux de la Roche Magasin", 28. Bard A.J., Parsons R. and Jordan J,, "Standard Potentials in
Revue de l'Institut Fran9ais du Petrole, XXXIV(3) (1979) Aqueous Solution", Marcel Dekker Inc., New York, (1985).
371-386.
29. Dutrizac, J.E. and MacDonald, R.J.C., "The Synthesis of
15. Vaughan D.J. and Craig J.R., "Mineral Chemistry of Metal some Copper Sulides and Copper Sulfosalts in 500-700 Gram
Sulphides", Cambridge University Press, (1978), pp.390-392. Quantities", Mat.Res.Bull., 8 (1973) 961-972.
16. Locker L.D. and de Bruyn P.L., "The Kinetics of Dissolution 30. Crombie, D.J., Moody, G.J. and Thomas J.D.R.,
of II-VI Semiconductor Compounds in Nonoxidising Acids", "Observations on the Calibration of Solid-State Silver
J.Electrochem.Soc., 116(12), (1969), 1659-1665. Sulphide Membrane Ion-Selective Electrodes", Anal. Chim.
17. Tewari P.H. and Campbell A.B., "Dissolution of Iron Sulfide Acta, 80 (1975) 1-8.
(Troilite) in Aqueous Sulfuric Acid", J.Phys.Chem., 80(17) 31. Sekerka, I. and Lechner, J.F., "The Response of the
(1976) 1844-1848. Sulfide-Selective Electrode to Sulfide, Iodide and Cyanide",
18. Jibicki K., "Acid Decomposition Reactions on Compounds Anal. Chim. Acta, 93 (1977) 139-144.
and Minerals in the Fe-Ni-Sulphide System", Ph.D. Thesis, 32. Vesely, J,, Jensen, O.J. and Nicolaisen, B., "Ion-Selective
University of British Columbia, 1974. Electrodes Based on Silver Sulphide",t Anal. Chim. Acta, 62
19. Ingraham T.R., Parsons H.W. and Cabri L.J., "Leaching of (1972) 1-13.
Pyrrhotite with Hydrochloric Acid", Can.Met. Quarterly, 11(2) 33. Harsanyi, E.G., Toth, K. and Pungor, E., "The Behaviour of
(1972) 407-411. the Silver sulphide Precipitate-Based Ion-Selective Electrode
20. Subramanian K.N., Stratigakos E.S. and Jennings P.H., in the Low. Concentration Range", Anal. Chim. Acta, 161
"Hydrometallurgical Processing of Pyrrhotite", (1984) 333-341.
Can.Metall.Quart., 11(2) (1972) 425-434. 34. Hseu, T.M. and Rechnitz, G.A., "Analytical Study of a
21. Van Weert G., Mah K. and Piret N.L., "Hydrochloric Acid Sulfide Ion-Selective Membrane Electrode in Alkaline
Leaching of Nickeliferous Pyrrhotites from the Sudbury Solution", Anal. Chern., 40(7) (1968) 1054-1060.
District", CIM Bull., 67 (1974) 97-103. 35. Mosey, F. and Jago, D.A., "The Determination of Dissolved
22. Awakura Y., Kamei S. and Majima H., "A Kinetic Study of Sulphide Using a Sulphide-Selective Electrode", Technical
Nonoxidative Dissolution of Galena in Aqueous Acid Report TR53, 1977.
Solution", Met.Trans., 11B (1980) 377-381.
205
Table 1. Iron Sulphide Content from a Section of the Fulmar Sands -0.70
• Philips IS 550-S• l.S.E.
Iron Sulphide Content Reservoir Production Potential Bed thickness -0.72
~ Af!/Ag,S Wire Electrode
%bv ft
0-1.5 Very Good 100 u.i
-0.74 ~
~··-
(k = 1-10 D, <11 = 25- 35%) <..)
.. .
-0.76 ~
0.2-3.5 Poor 200 u)
(k = 1-500 mD, <II= 5- 33%) -0.78 ~
ui
0- L5 Good 200 >
> -0.80
0.5-6
(k = 30-4000 mD, <11 = 20- 30%)
Moderate - Good
(k = 2-1000 mD, ~ = 15- 25%)
100
..._
~ -0.82
.
~
.
EQ) ~
2-4 Very Poor 200 -0.84
(k=0.1-2mD.~= 13-18%) 0
D....
-0.86
-0.88
l ..
-0.90
-6 -4 -2
I Jog [ HS· ],""'"red
I
1.0 t" t I i I Fig. 2-Callbration plot for Philips IS sso-s 2 - I.S.E. and Ag/Ag 2 S wire electron.
I Fe(OH) 3 : Fe(OH)~
I
o.8 r--L~---~
\
i \
\
0.6
>
-
\
so42- \
\
~ 0.4 \
Fe293 (s) ~ Brass
...
N \
=
Q
\
00 \
\
D Epoxy Resin
tt3 0.2 \
\ • Iron Sulphide
> \
] \
111!11 Silver/Silver Sulphide
...... 0
cQJ
......
0
~ -0.2
QJ
"0
0
;...
...... -0.4
~
!
QJ
~ -0.6
-0.8
Fe
•~
-1.0
0 2 4 6
Rg. 1-Eh-pH diagram for the Iron-sulfur-water syatem-temperature = 298 K; pressure= 1 atmoaphere;
{[FE(II))+(Fe(lll)]} =1o-• M; [total dleaolved sulfui')=10-• M.
8 10 12 14