Introduction To Management Chaper 6
Introduction To Management Chaper 6
CHAPTER SIX
LEADING/DIRECTING
Leading/Directing is management function which actuates the organization
members to work efficiently and effectively for the attainment of organizational
objectives. Planning, organizing and staffing are merely preparations for doing the
work, and the work actually starts when managers start performing the directing
function. Directing is the interpersonal aspect of management, which deals directly
with influencing, guiding, supervising, and motivating the subordinates for the
accomplishment of the predetermined objectives. Directing is a challenging function
of management, because it deals with the human element of the organization,
which represents a complex of forces about whom not much is known. A person's
beliefs, hopes, ambitions, behavior, satisfaction, and interaction with other persons
are all involved in the directing process.
DEFINITION OF LEADING/DIRECTING
Directing can be defined:
Leading is the process of influencing people so that they will contribute to
organization and group goals.
It is influencing people so that they will work willingly and enthusiastically
towards the achievement of organizational goals.
Leading is the process by which managers seek to influence subordinates to
accomplish goals by communicating with them.
When we say influencing, it does not mean that coercing/forcing, imposing or
pushing people behind. It means rather-motivating people so that they contribute
their maximum effort for the achievement of organizational goal. It is placing
oneself before the group and facilitating progress and inspires followers to
accomplish organizational (group) objectives.
IMPORTANCE OF DIRECTING
Directing enables a manager to convert his/her decision into effective actions. In
fact, there is a high degree of correlation between directing and work performance.
There is a dominant feeling that directing is more of an art than it is a science since
considerable amount of skill is required to understand and work with people.
The importance of the directing function in an organization can be presented as
follows:
Directing initiatesby giving directives and guidance to employees
Directing integrates employees’ effort by coordinating actions of the members
and leading toward the objectives
Directing attempts to get the maximum output of individuals by providing ways
to fully utilize the potentials and capabilities of employees.
Directing facilitates changes by incorporating environmental and internal
changes into the organization
Directing provides stability by balancing the different parts of the organization.
Managers should try to integrate both organizational and individual objectives in
order to get the work done by subordinates. Managers must be good leaders to
guide, counsel and influence subordinates so as to win their confidence and
1 | P a g e Introduction to Management- Lecture Note BY: Fasika Fanta
Infolink Univerfsity college Department of Business Management
Studies that were conducted on the first category have failed to distinguish/uncover
any traits that clearly and consistently distinguish leaders from followers. Leaders
as a group have been found to be somewhat taller, brighter, more extroverted,
persistent and more self-confident than non-leaders. However, millions of people
have these traits, but most of them obviously will never attain a leadership position.
In addition, many established leaders did not and do not have these traits.
(Napoleon, for example, was quite short, and Lincoln was moody and introverted.)
Interestingly enough, studies have also found that people who are too intelligent
compared with other group members do not emerge as leaders-perhaps because
they are too different or too far removed from the group.Studies that were
conducted on the second category have generally failed to isolate traits that are
strongly associated with successful leadership.
Generally, the efforts to identify universal leadership traits ran into difficulties for
the following reasons:
1. Not all leaders possess all the traits and many non-leaders may possess most of
the traits.
2. It gives no guidance as to the magnitude of each trait for a person to be a
leader.
3. No agreement has been reached as to what their relationships are to the actual
instances of leadership.
4. Traits tend to be a chicken-and-egg proposition i.e. Successful leaders may
display traits such as good vocabulary, education and self-confidence after they
have assumed leadership positions.
B. Behavioral Leadership Theories
Behavioral theory assumes that leaders can be made rather than born. Rather than
try to figure out what effective leaders were, researchers tried to determine what
effective leaders did, how they delegated tasks, how they communicated with and
tried to motivate their subordinates, how they carried out their tasks, and so no. This
tries to answer the questions “What do effective leaders do? What ineffective
leaders don't do? How do subordinate react emotionally and behaviorally
(performance) to what the leader does?"
3 | P a g e Introduction to Management- Lecture Note BY: Fasika Fanta
Infolink Univerfsity college Department of Business Management
Two major dimensions of leader behavior emerged from this body of research; one
deals with how leaders get the job done and the other deals with how leaders treat
and interact with their subordinates. The following two studies were conducted:-
In short, the behavioral theory attempted to identify effective leader behaviors that
would work in every situation. But researchers found that leader behaviors that
worked best in one situation were not often as effective in other situations.
C. The Contingency /Situational Leadership Theory
Situational leadership theory grows out of an attempt to explain the inconsistent
findings about traits and styles /behaviors. Situational theory proposes that the
effectiveness of a particular style of leader behavior depends on the situation. As
situations change, different styles become appropriate. This directly changes the
idea of one best style of leadership. In other words, the contingency/situational
theory holds that appropriate leader traits or behaviors are contingent or dependent
on relevant situational characteristics. More specifically, the contingency leadership
theory states that, leadership is the result of the interaction of:
Leaders behavior and competence
Followers behavior and competence
Situations-situational variables such as job characteristics, organizational policies,
leaders member relations (the extent to which a leader has the support of group
members), position power (the amount of power that the organization gives the
leader to accomplish necessary tasks).
D. Theory X and Theory Y Assumptions about People
A manager’s philosophy about work and the people who perform the work will
influence his/her approach to leadership. Douglas McGregor has hypothesized two
sets of assumptions about people that serve as a philosophical base for leadership
action. These are Theory X and Theory Y Assumptions.
rewards and punishment, i.e. motivation is through incentives and fear. In this style,
decision-making is solely by the manager, in other words, the leader retains all
authority and responsibility. In the extreme case, the manager makes the decision
and announces it to the work group. There is no opportunity for input into the
decision-making process by the subordinates and communication is primarily
downward. The hallmark of this style is that the manager, who retains all the
authority, executes the entire process. Consequently, the autocratic style is
sometimes called the “I” approach. Variations of this approach find the manager
making the decision and then “telling” it to employees or making the decision and
allowing the group the opportunity to ask questions. The autocratic leader is task-
oriented and places little value on showing consideration to subordinations as a
leadership technique. The Autocratic manager uses Theory X assumption as his
philosophical base for leadership.
Situations where managers are compelled/ forced to use this leadership style:
When there is a need to influence subordinates in favor of organizational
objectives
When subordinates are new, they need to be directed.
When the situation calls for unilateral decision-making
Limitations
Employees’/subordinates’ ideas will not be used to solve organizational
problems,
Subordinates would be demotivated, i.e. It may suppress individual initiative
Poor implementation of decisions
2. Participative/ Democratic/“We” approach
Managers who use the participative style share decision making authority with
subordinates. The degree of sharing can range from the manager’s presenting a
tentative decision that is subject to change to letting the group or subordinate
participate in making the decision. Sometimes called the “we” approach,
participative management style involves others and lets them bring their unique
viewpoints, talents, and experiences to bear on an issue. This style is strongly
emphasized today because of the trends toward downsizing, employee
empowerment and worker teams.
A consultative and democratic approach works best for resolving issues that affect
more than just a manager or decision maker. People affected by decisions support
them more enthusiastically when they participate in the decision making than when
decisions are imposed on them. Also, if others in the management’s unit know more
than the manager does about the issue, common sense urges their inclusion in
decisions concerning it.
Limitations
1) Subordinates may be too involved to influence the manager even when there is
no need.
2) The manager may not be able to influence the subordinates to the extent
needed.
However, the major advantage of this leadership style is that, it enhances personal
commitment through participation.
3. Laissez faire style/Free rein style/ “They” approach
Often called “they” approach or the spectator style, the free rein style empowers
individuals or groups to function on their own, without the involvement from the
managers to whom they report. The style relies heavily on delegation of authority
and works best when the parties have expert power, when participants have know
how to use the tools and techniques needed for their tasks. Under this style,
managers set limits and remain available for consultation. The managers also hold
participants accountable for their actions by reviewing and evaluating performance.
Free rein leadership works particularly well with managers and experienced
professionals in engineering, design, research, and sales. Such people generally
resist other kind of supervision.In most organizations managers must be able to use
the decision making style that circumstances dictate. As people and circumstances
constantly change, managers should also switch from one style to another
depending on the situation they face at a time.
3 2
From this we can understand that deficiency triggers a drive for need satisfaction,
which causes an individual to take a certain course of action that will alleviate a
need and reduce a drive. The need for food for example will result in hunger and
hunger will drive or motivate the individual to take action (eating food), which will
achieve the goal. This goal attainment will restore the physiological or psychological
balance and reduce or cutoff the drive for food.
Motivation Vs Satisfaction
Motivation refers to the drive and effort to satisfy a want or a goal. Satisfaction
refers to the contentment experienced when a want is satisfied. In other words,
motivation implies a drive toward an outcome, and satisfaction is the outcome
already experienced.
Motivation and Performance
All too often, motivation and performance are assumed to be one and the same.
This faulty assumption can lead to poor managerial decisions. The following formula
for performance helps put motivation into proper perspective:
Performance = Ability x Motivation x Environmental conditions
Thus, we see motivation is a necessary but insufficient contributor to job
performance. The multiplication sign is used to emphasize how a weakness in one
factor can negate the other. The above relationship between performance and
motivation clearly shows us that managers should hire individuals who have the
ability to do what is required. After that, the management challenge is providing
environmental conditions that nurture and support individual motivation to work
toward organizational goals. Keeping other variables constant, motivation and
performance have neither positive nor negative relationship. As motivation
increases, job performance increases, reaches its maximum and the decreases.
THEORIES OF MOTIVATION
There are several theories of motivation. In general, these theories can be grouped
into two as content theories and process theories. Theories that belong to the
former category include: Abraham Maslow’s hierarchy of needs theory, Herzberg’s
two factor theory, Mccelland’s need for achievement theory and Alderfer’s ERG
theory. Theories that belong to the latter category include: V. Vroom’s expectancy
theory, B.F. Skinner’s reinforcement theory, equity theory and goal setting theory.
Below, some of these theories are discussed briefly while the rest theories are to be
covered in advanced courses.
A. Carrot and Stick Approach
This metaphor relates the use of rewards and penalties in order to induce desired
human behavior. It comes from the old story that to make a donkey move one must
put a carrot in front of it and if it does not move beat it with stick from behind.
Despite all the researches and theories of motivation that have come to the fore in
recent years, reward and punishment are still recognized/considered by strong
motivators. For centuries, however, they were too often thought of as the only
forces that could motivate people. Carrot - money in the form of pay or bonuses.
Stick – fear such as fear of loss of job, loss of income, reduction of bonuses
demotion or some other penalty.
Failures of carrot and stick approach
1. Carrot can be obtained by any member of the organization without
differentiation in performance – through such practices as salary increases and
promotion by seniority, automatic “merit” increases, and executive bonuses not
based on individual manager performance. It is as simple as this: If a person put a
donkey in a pen full of carrots and then stood outside with a carrot, would the
donkey be encouraged to come out of the pen?
2. Stick in the form of fear is not the best kind of motivating factor. It often gives
rise to defensive or refectory behavior, such as union organization, poor quality
work, executive indifference, failure of a manager to take any risk in decision-
making, or even dishonesty.
B. Maslow's Need Hierarchy Theory
This is one of the most widely known theories of motivation. The critical part of this
theory is that needs are arranged in hierarchy. Since one need does not disappear
when another emerges, all needs tend to be partially satisfied in each area.
According to Maslow, human needs can be categorized into five as: physiological
needs, safety needs, social needs, esteem needs and self actualization needs.
Physiological Needs: The physiological needs are at the bottom of the hierarchy
because they tend to bear the highest strength until they are reasonably satisfied.
Unless these needs are satisfied to the degree necessary for the efficient operation
of the body, the majority of a person’s activities will probably be at this level. The
other levels will provide him with little motivation. These needs include the need for
food, shelter, cloth, water, rest, air, sex, etc. They are survival needs without which
human being’s survival will be in danger.
Safety Needs: until the physiological needs of the human race are addressed to a
reasonable degree, safety needs will not be fully addressed. The degree of
reasonableness is subjective. In this hierarchy comes the need for safety- a need for
being free of physical danger also referred to as self-preservation. These needs
show the need to live in an environment where there is no harm.
Social Needs: After the first two needs are satisfied, social needs become
important in the need hierarchy. This category includes the need for friendship,
affection, acceptance, and interaction with others. Since man is a social being, he
has a need to belong and to be accepted by various groups. When social needs
become dominant, a person will strive for meaningful relations with others. If the
opportunity for association with other people is reduced, individuals often take
vigorous action against the obstacles to social interaction. In the organization,
individuals form informal group environments.
Esteem Needs: Esteem needs are concerned with self-respect, self-confidence, a
feeling of personal worth, feelings of being unique and a need to be recognized by
one and all. Satisfaction of these needs produces feelings of self-confidence,
prestige, power and control. The satisfaction of esteem needs is not always
obtained through mature or adaptive behavior. It is sometimes generated by
disruptive and irresponsible actions. Some of the social problems have their roots in
the frustration of esteem needs
Self Actualization Needs: includes self fulfillment and realization of one’s
potential. Self actualization is the need to maximize one’s potential, whatever it
may be. This is related to the development of intrinsic capabilities which lead
individuals to seek situations which can utilize their potential. This includes
competence which implies control over environmental factors, both physical and
social, and achievement. An individual with high levels of achievement needs will be
restless unless he can find fulfillment in doing what he is trained to do best. As
Maslow puts it, "this need might be phrased as the desire to become more and
more what one is, to become everything that one is capable of becoming."
The major assumptions upon which the need hierarchy theory is based
are:
Relatedness needs:are concerned with relationships to the social environment, and cover love or
belonging, affiliation, and meaningful interpersonal relationships of a safety or esteem nature.
Growth needs:are concerned with the development of potential, and cover self esteem and self
actualization.
C) COMMUNICATION
Communication is the process through which people and organizations accomplish
objectives. By communicating with others we share attitudes, values, emotions,
ambitions, wants, and needs. Behind every success, there is effective
communication that is well planned and thoughtfully executed. Successful
managers effectively communicate their vision for a work unit or the company as a
whole. The following points show the importance of communication in organizations.
“Communicate everything you possibly can to your partners. The more they know,
the more they will understand. The more they understand, the more they will care.
Once they care, there is no stopping them. If you don’t trust your associates to
know what is going on, they will know you don’t really consider them partners.
Information is power and the gain you get from empowering your associates more
than offsets the risk of informing your competitors".
“Listen to everyone in your company and figure out ways to get them talking. The
folks on the front lines-the ones who actually talk to the customer- are the only ones
who really know what is going out there. You would better find out what they know.
This really is what total quality is all about. To push responsibility down in your
organization, and to force good ideas to bubble up within it, you must listen to what
your associates are trying to tell you”.
Communication Process
Communication is a two way interaction between two parties to transmit
information and mutual understanding between themselves.Communication is the
transmission of information-data in a coherent, usable form-from one person to one
person or group to another. Rational communication strives to achieve a common
understanding-agreement about the meaning and intent of the message-among all
parties to each communication. Although much of the managerial information that
managers rely on is in numeric form, the greatest portion of managerial activity
depends on verbal communication and competent use of language. Able
communicators respect the conventions of language-grammar, spelling and
punctuations. They know precisely what they wish to say and thoughtfully select the
best way to say it. In addition, the communicator needs to be certain that the
person who receives the information actually understands the
message.Communication is a process- a set of steps usually taken in a definite
sequence. As a process, communication is consists of the major elements described
below.
1. Sender: is the initiator or source of the information.
2. Receiver: is the person or group that gets the information
3. Encoding: it takes place when the sender translates the information to be
transmitted into a series of symbols. It is the mechanism through which one’s
mental thoughts into understandable symbols.
4. Decoding: is the process by which the receiver interprets the message and
translate it into meaningful information.
5. Medium/Channel: isthe means chosen by the sender to transmit the message
6. Message: isthe information that the sender wants to transmit.
7. Feedback: is the mechanism that enables the sender and the receiver to assure if
the intended communication has taken place and mutual understanding has been
achieved.
8. Noise: is any factor that disturbs, confuses or interferes with communication. Noise
can arise along what is called the communication channel or method of
communication.
The communication process is depicted in the following diagram.
Message
Noise
Feedback
Types of Communication
Communication can be classified into two broad categories as formal and informal
communication.