TAC - Canadian Roundabout Guide - ROW Design Exceptions
TAC - Canadian Roundabout Guide - ROW Design Exceptions
Design Guide
Design Exceptions
Implementation
Background
The Region of Waterloo (Region) has been implementing Roundabouts since 2003. The
Region has also established a Roundabout Coordination Committee (RCC) whose
mandate is to review all proposed roundabout locations and recommend what
intersection type is most appropriate for the location. The RCC meets multiple times per
year and is made up of staff from various departments at the Region of Waterloo,
(Design & Construction, Transportation, Operations, Corridor Management and
Planning) staff from the Cities of Cambridge, Kitchener, Waterloo, and the Townships.
The decisions the RCC makes are based on Life Cycle Cost Analysis (LCCA), but will
also consider other factors such as: gateway features; speed reduction; and
roundabouts in corridors before providing a recommendation. A roundabout will be
considered even if the LCCA of the roundabout exceeds the cost of traffic signals by up
to 50%.
Policy
Effective immediately for the planning and design of roundabouts on Region of Waterloo
roads, use TAC’s CRDG- January 2017 along with the following Region Design
Exceptions listed below. Please note the Region reserves the right for final decision on
all design, signage, pavement markings and implementation of roundabouts on all
Regional roads.
Notification
Please notify Mr. Marcos Kroker, P. Eng. Head, Transportation Expansion Program,
mkroker@regionofwaterloo.ca or 519-575-4750 of any comments, noted omissions or
errors in these documents.
2564036 Version: 2
Region of Waterloo- TAC –Canadian Roundabouts
Design Guide
Design Exceptions
Chapter 1 – Introduction
1.4.3.1 - Turbo roundabouts are not considered appropriate for use in the Region of
Waterloo due to the inclusion of mountable lane dividers which place undue risk to
motorcycles and motorized scooters. There are also safety concerns with winter
maintenance.
2.3.5 - Transit Vehicles 3rd Paragraph – The Region of Waterloo does not encourage
use of bus bays in their roadways.
Bus stop locations – It is the Region’s preference to locate GRT bus stops at the far
side of intersections. Left turning routes need special consideration to allow buses room
to manoeuvre and change lanes.
2.2.2 Care should be taken in situations where there are known visually impaired users.
Chapter 3
Fig. 3.1 Stage 1 Screening Phase- The Region has our own Screening Tool and Traffic
Flow Worksheet (both available on our website) to help determine feasibility of a
roundabout.
3.3.2.2 – The Region’s evaluation method for financial analysis for roundabouts is Life
Cycle Cost Analysis (LCCA).
The Region typically has a Public Consultation Centre to show the public what the
design for the roundabout is and the impacts of the design. If in a rural setting or if the
intersection is located in a minimally developed area, then the Project Manager can
send letters and meet with individuals directly impacted (this needs to be confirmed with
the Director of Design and Construction and the Commissioner of TES). All roundabout
projects need to be presented to the Region’s Planning and Works Committee and
Regional Council for approval.
General Notes:
For modelling purposes the designer must use edge of pavement, not face of curb.
2564036 Version: 2
Region of Waterloo- TAC –Canadian Roundabouts
Design Guide
Design Exceptions
Figure 4.2: Regional staff generally do not increase traffic volumes by PCEs for heavy
vehicle percentages, and also usually assume PHFs of 1.0, resulting in no change for
observed or modelled traffic.
Section 4.3.1: The Simplified Methods cited are not in use at the Region.
4.3.2 Detailed Methods. The Region will not permit the gap acceptance method (Sidra).
Chapter 5 – Safety
Region will not permit use of prediction models summarized in Table 5.5 as they are not
representative of Regional data.
Region will not permit use of CMFs summarized in Table 5.6 as they are not
representative of Regional data.
See Region of Waterloo Std Dwg 221 for some specific requirements.
Design vehicle is WB -17 & 20, however transit buses, school buses or snow ploughs
may dictate geometric requirements.
All single lane roundabouts require a truck apron, min of 3.0m wide and must
accommodate off tracking of the design vehicle.
Multi-lanes
6.2.5 pg 84 first line replace “Overall entry width (curb face-to-curb face) should be
governed by:” with “Overall entry width (edge of pavement to edge of pavement) should
be governed by:”
6.2. 8 Exit Curves – In general the Region’s preference is to flatten exit curves to
improve drivability, particularly for buses and trucks and open exit sight lines.
2564036 Version: 2
Region of Waterloo- TAC –Canadian Roundabouts
Design Guide
Design Exceptions
A minimum crosswalk setback of 12-13 m between the crosswalk and yield bar allows
for vehicle stacking and implementation of Level 2 Crosswalks as per OTM Book 15.
Region’s preference is for Perpendicular crosswalks as per Figure 6.8 with parallel bars
and ladder stripes.
Region’s preference is for Right turn by-passes with yield at exit leg as per Figure 6.26 .
Figure 6.35 – Set splitter island length to 60m from the yield bar and extend the outside
curb and gutter an additional 30-60 m beyond the splitter island.
For multilane roundabouts the Region’s preference is to have the circulatory roadway
crowned 2/3 from the outside curb to the central island. Catchbasins should be placed
in a wide concrete curb and gutter (OPSD 600.020) and not have the frame and grate
protrude into the asphalt roadway.
Turbo roundabouts are not considered appropriate for use in the Region of Waterloo
due to the inclusion of mountable lane dividers which place undue risk to motorcycles
and motorized scooters.
2564036 Version: 2
Region of Waterloo- TAC –Canadian Roundabouts
Design Guide
Design Exceptions
7.4 Signalization
If signals are to be implemented, it should follow OTM standards rather than MUTCD
and TAC Pedestrian Control Guide.
7.4.2.1 At this time, the Region provides pedestrian control through Level 2 Pedestrian
Crossovers. Presently the Region considers Level 2 Crossover Type C only. Other
options including but not limited to Level 2 Crossover Type A and B and traffic signals
must go through a proper engineering evaluation to assess potential road user impacts
and impacts on other crosswalks at the roundabout being considered as well as other
remaining roundabouts in the Region.
Chapter 8 - Illumination
Perimeter lighting is required at all Region of Waterloo roundabouts and lighting levels
need to meet or exceed the Region’s Illumination Policy.
Chapter 9 – Landscaping
2564036 Version: 2