Bibekda JMMM
Bibekda JMMM
Bibekda JMMM
Research articles
a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t
Article history: The magnetic properties and magnetocaloric effect (MCE) of binary intermetallic compound Er3Pd2 were
Received 16 October 2017 studied. It exhibits a paramagnetic (PM) to antiferromagnetic (AFM) transition at Néel temperature (TN)
Received in revised form 2 January 2018 = 10 K. A large reversible MCE was observed which is related to a second order magnetic transition from
Accepted 12 February 2018
PM to AFM state. The values of maximum magnetic entropy change ðDSmax M Þ and adiabatic temperature
Available online 13 February 2018
change ðDT max
ad Þ reach 8.9 J/kg-K and 2.9 K respectively for the field change of 50 kOe with no obvious hys-
teresis loss. The effective magnetic moment was determined to be 10.16 mB/Er3+, which is notably higher
Keywords:
than that of free ion value of Er3+ (9.59 mB), suggests that Pd ions also have considerable amount of mag-
Intermetallic
Rare earth
netic moments in this compound.
Reversible magnetocaloric effect Ó 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2018.02.036
0304-8853/Ó 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
B. Maji et al. / Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials 456 (2018) 236–240 237
2. Experimental details
Fig. 1. (a) Rietveld fitted room temperature XRD pattern of Er3Pd2. Asterisks and arrows indicate the positions of the Er and Pd impurity phases respectively. (b) The unit cell
of Er3Pd2. 2a and 4 h Wyckoff sites are occupied by Er and 4 g are occupied by Pd atoms.
238 B. Maji et al. / Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials 456 (2018) 236–240
Fig. 3. (a) Magnetization isotherm for Er3Pd2 at different temperatures. (b) Arrott plots (M2 vs. H/M plots) in the temperature range 8 K to 50 K.
shown in Fig. 4. The maximum value of DSM for a field change of 50 where H is the magnetic field under which the heat capacity was
kOe is 8.9 J/kg-K at 12 K. Although the maximum value of DSM is measured. The isothermal entropy change and adiabatic tempera-
smaller than those which undergoes FOMT, the present value is ture change can be calculated using the following formulas:
comparable with those having second order magnetic transitions
DSM ðT; DHÞ ¼ SðT; Hf Þ SðT; Hi Þ ð2Þ
e.g. PrCo2B2, GdPd2Si, PrNi, (Ho, Tb, Dy)2In etc. [29–34].
The temperature dependency of heat capacity, Cp(T), of Er3Pd2
DT ad ðT; DHÞ ¼ TðS; Hf Þ TðS; Hi Þ ð3Þ
sample was also measured in zero and 50 kOe magnetic field. As
shown in the left panel of Fig. 5, zero field Cp(T) curve exhibits a The temperature dependency of DSM and DTad estimated from
k- shape peak around 10 K indicating a typical SOMT correspond- the Eqs. (2) and (3) are shown in Fig. 5(a) and (b). For comparison,
ing to AFM to PM transition confirmed from the magnetic mea- we have also plotted (in the same figure) the temperature depen-
surements. The Néel temperature (TN) determined from the heat dency of DSM derived by using the magnetization isotherms and
capacity data is 9 K which is consistent with that deduce from Maxwell relation. As evident from the figure, the temperature vari-
the magnetization measurement. Using the field dependency of ation of DSM obtained from heat capacity data and magnetization
Cp(T) data, one can estimate the total entropy at different magnetic isotherm are almost the same over the measured temperature
field by the following integration: range. It can be also seen that the temperature dependency of
Z T DSM and DTad are also almost similar except a slight difference
CðT; HÞ
SðT; HÞ ¼ dT ð1Þ in temperature of the peak position. The maximum value of mag-
T
0 H
netic entropy change ðDSmax M Þ and adiabatic temperature change
ðDT max
ad Þ reach 8.9 J/kg-K and 2.9 K respectively for a field change
of 50 kOe. As mentioned above, relative cooling power (RCP) is
another significant quality of the refrigerant materials which is
essentially the amount of heat transfer between the cold and hot
sinks in an ideal refrigeration cycle. The RCP is estimated as the
product of maximum magnetic entropy change ðDSmax M Þ and the
full width at half maximum in DSM ðTÞ curve i.e. RCP =
DSmax
M dT FWHM . The dT FWHM value is 22.8 K for a field change of
50 kOe and the corresponding RCP value is 201 J/kg. The maximum
values of DSM ðTÞ, DTad and RCP for the field change 50 kOe and
the transition temperature (TM) for Er3Pd2 and some other MCE
materials with similar transition temperature are listed in Table 1.
The values of DSmax M and DT max
ad are comparable with some of the
MCE materials with similar temperature region.
4. Conclusion
Fig. 5. (a) Heat capacity, Cp of Er3Pd2 as a function of temperature at magnetic field 0 and 50 kOe. (b) Temperature variation of magnetic entropy change, DSM, obtained
from heat capacity (square symbols) and magnetization measurements (circular symbols) for a field change of DH = 50 kOe. (c) Adiabatic temperature change, DTad, for a field
change of DH = 50 kOe.
Table 1
The transition temperature (TM), the order of transition, the maximum values of magnetocaloric parameters (DSmax max
M , DT ad and RCP) for a field change of 50 kOe for Er3Pd2, and
some MCE materials. A blank column with ‘‘——” mark indicates that the value is not available in the literatures.
of 50 kOe. The reliability of the parameters can be justified from [8] L. Li, K. Nishimura, W.D. Hutchison, Z. Qian, D. Huo, T. Namiki, Appl. Phys. Lett.
100 (2012) 152403.
the observed overlapping of change in entropy ðDSmax M Þ curves [9] L. Li, W.D. Hutchison, D. Huo, T. Namiki, Z. Qian, K. Nishimura, Scripta Mater.
obtained from specific heat and magnetization data. 67 (2012) 237.
[10] S.B. Gupta, K.G. Suresh, Appl. Phys. Lett. 102 (2013) 022408.
[11] L. Li, B. Saensunon, W.D. Hutchison, D. Huo, K. Nishimura, J. Alloys Compd. 582
Appendix A. Supplementary data (2014) 670.
[12] B. Maji, M.K. Ray, K.G. Suresh, S. Banerjee, J. Appl. Phys. 116 (2014) 213913.
[13] L. Li, Y. Yuan, Y. Zhang, T. Namiki, K. Nishimura, R. Pöttgen, S. Zhou, Appl. Phys.
Supplementary data associated with this article can be found, in Lett. 107 (2015) 132401.
the online version, at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2018.02.036. [14] Ling-Wei Li, Chin. Phys. B 25 (2016) 037502.
[15] Y. Zhang, L. Hou, Z. Ren, X. Li, G. Wilde, J. Alloys Compd. 656 (2016) 635–639.
[16] Y. Yang, Y. Zhang, X. Xu, S. Geng, L. Hou, X. Li, Z. Ren, G. Wilde, J. Alloys Compd.
References 692 (2017) 665–669.
[17] Y. Zhang, D. Guo, Y. Yang, S. Geng, X. Li, Z. Ren, G. Wilde, J. Alloys Compd. 702
(2017) 546–550.
[1] V.K. Pecharsky, K.A. Gschneidner Jr., Phys Rev. Lett. 78 (1997) 4494.
[18] L. Li, G. Hu, Y. Qi, I. Umehara, Sci. Rep. 7 (2017) 42908.
[2] F.X. Hu, B.G. Shen, J.R. Sun, Z.H. Cheng, G.H. Rao, X.X. Zhang, Appl. Phys. Lett. 78
[19] Y. Zhang, D. Guo, H. Li, S. Geng, J. Wang, X. Li, H. Xu, Z. Ren, G. Wilde, J. Alloys
(2001) 3675.
Compd. 733 (2018) 40–44.
[3] A. Fujita, S. Fujieda, Y. Hasegawa, K. Fukamichi, Phys Rev. B 67 (2003) 104416.
[20] L. Li, D. Huo, K. Su, R. Pöttgen, Intermetallics 93 (2018) 343.
[4] J. Lyubina, K. Nenkov, L. Schultz, O. Gutfleisch, Phys Rev. Lett. 101 (2008)
[21] Y. Zhang, D. Guo, Y. Yang, J. Wang, S. Geng, X. Li, Z. Ren, G. Wilde, Intermetallics
177203.
88 (2017) 61–64.
[5] A. Yan, K.H. Müller, L. Schultz, O. Gutfleisch, J. Appl. Phys. 99 (2006) 08K903.
[22] A. Chaturvedi, S. Stefanoski, M.H. Phan, G.S. Nolas, H. Srikanth, Appl. Phys. Lett.
[6] O. Tegus, E. Brück, K.H.J. Buschow, F.R. de Boer, Nature 415 (2002) 150.
99 (2011) 162513.
[7] T. Samanta, I. Das, S. Banerjee, Appl. Phys. Lett. 91 (2007) 152506.
240 B. Maji et al. / Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials 456 (2018) 236–240
[23] R. Caballero-Flores, V. Franco, A. Aonde, K.E. Knipling, M.A. Willard, Appl. Phys. [32] Q. Zhang, X.G. Liu, F. Yang, W.J. Feng, X.G. Zhao, D.J. Kang, Z.D. Zhang, J. Phys. D:
Lett. 98 (2011) 102505. Appl. Phys. 42 (2009) 055011.
[24] L. Li, M. Kadonaga, D. Huo, Z. Qian, T. Namiki, K. Nishimura, Appl. Phys. Lett. [33] Q. Zhang, J.H. Cho, J. Du, F. Yang, X.G. Liu, W.J. Feng, Y.J. Zhang, J. Li, Z.D. Zhang,
101 (2012) 122401. Solid State Commun. 149 (2009) 396.
[25] L. Li, T. Namiki, D. Huo, Z. Qian, K. Nishimura, Appl. Phys. Lett. 103 (2013) [34] Q. Zhang, J.H. Cho, B. Li, W.J. Hu, Z.D. Zhang, Appl. Phys. Lett. 94 (2009) 182501.
222405. [35] L. Li, K. Nishimura, G. Usui, D. Huo, Z. Qian, Intermetallics 23 (2012) 101.
[26] L. Li, O. Niehaus, M. Kersting, R. Pöttgen, Appl. Phys. Lett. 104 (2014) 092416. [36] L. Li, K. Nishimura, Appl. Phys. Lett. 95 (2009) 132505.
[27] L. Li, Y. Yuan, Y. Qi, Q. Wang, S. Zhou, Mater. Res. Lett. 6 (2017) 67–71. [37] Y. Zhang, B. Yang, G. Wilde, J. Alloys Compd. 619 (2015) 12.
[28] V.K. Pecharsky, K.A. Gschneidner Jr., J. Appl. Phys. 86 (1999) 565. [38] L.C. Wang, L. Cui, Q.Y. Dong, Z.J. Mo, Z.Y. Xu, F.X. Hu, J.R. Sun, B.G. Shen, J. Appl.
[29] L. Li, K. Nishimura, J. Appl. Phys. 106 (2009) 023903. Phys. 115 (2014) 233913.
[30] R. Rawat, I. Das, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 13 (2001) L57. [39] L. Li, D. Huo, H. Igawa, K. Nishimura, J. Alloys Compd. 509 (2011) 1796.
[31] A.O. Pecharsky, Yu. Mozharivskyj, K.W. Dennis, K.A. Gschneidner Jr., R.W.
McCallum, G.J. Miller, V.K. Pecharsk, Phys. Rev. B 68 (2003) 134452.