Free From Material Misstatements
Free From Material Misstatements
True and Fair – Can’t test every transaction so can’t say accurate – Selects samples to review
Factual , agree with underlying records , clear, unbiased and free from material misstatements
Expectation Gap – Some users incorrectly believe that an audit provides absolute assurance – that
the audit opinion is a guarantee the financial statements are ‘ correct ‘. This and other
misconceptions about the role of an auditor are referred to as the expectation gap.
Acceptance
Engagement
The plan
Substantive testing
Audit Report
Pros and Cons of external audit
ETHICS
IFAC , International federation of accountants issued a code of ethics , guidance on how to behave
morally and professionally and accountants should act in the public interest , information on ethics
can be found in a code known as the fundamental principles
O – Objectivity
P – Professional Behaviour
I – Integrity
C – Confidentiality
ETHICS THREAT
Each of these threats need to be considered during the acceptance stage /planning stage of the
audit
1. Self review
2. Familiarity
3. Self interest
4. Advocacy
5. Intimidation
Corporate Governance – Set of guidelines that listed companies should follow, Advice on how to run
your company well
Chairmen and Ceo with their ed’s and ned’s create committees who take on responsibilities for the
company 1. Audit 2.Risk 3. Remunaration 4. Nomination Committees
Internal Audit
1. Independence
2. Scope of work
3. Objectives
4. Reporting
5. Appointment and removal
6. Legal requirement
1. Scope of work
2. Technical Competence
3. Report quality
4. Independence
First step of auditing or the audit process
Acceptance Stage
1. Professional Clearance
2. Confidentiality
3. Auditor considerations (Time, skill, fee)
4. Audit risk consideration
Ethical considerations –
1. Self interest
2. Self review
3. Familiarity
4. Advocacy
5. Intimidation
This is an agreement that is put in place of the start of the audit process
Purpose of EL – 1. Minimise the risk of understanding and reduce the expectation gap
ISA 210
Risk of inappropriate audit opinion, i.a. there are material misstatements present in the financial
statements
The difference between what is in the financial statements and what should be in the financial
statements in accordance with the applicable financial reporting framework.
AR = IR*CR*DR
IR = Inherent Risk
CR = Control risk
DR = Detection risk
Both of these standards help the auditors through the planning stage end ensures audit risk are
assessed properly
To understand the entity fully the auditor must gather the following information
ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES
ISA 520 – Evaluations of financial information through analysis of plausible relationships among both
financial and non-financial data ( Comparison of Financial and non-financial data )
AP can be used at the planning stage, at the completion and review stage and for substantive testing
stage
Purpose of AP
Ratio’s
They look after the external auditor and develops ISA ( Currently 36 ) and develop ISQC ( Currently
1)
FRAUD
Auditors have duty to identify and communicate any evidence found that fraud is present
1. Scope
2. Timing
3. Direction
If any misstatements are above the Performance Materiality, they shall be recorded in the summary
of unadjusted errors or evaluation of misstatements
1. Planning
2. Audit Performance
3. Completion
HEAR ME
H – Human Resources
E – Ethical Requirement
R – Responsibilities of Leadership
M – Monitoring – Involves 2 types of Reviews
1. Direction
2. Supervision
3. Review
INTERNAL CONTROL
A control is a procedure put in place to achieve company objectives, sound control system to run
well
Key Objective
Limitations
1. Human error
2. Fraudulent collusion
3. Abuse of authority
1. Control Activities
2. Risk assessment procedures
3. Information systems
4. Monitoring of controls
5. Environment
How the auditor reviews these internal control systems to look whether their effectiveness is up to
their satisfaction
Management letter
Management report
Control cycles
1. Sales
2. Purchases
3. Assets
4. Inventory
5. Payroll
6. Cash
1. Received order
2. Dispatched goods
3. Sent invoices
4. Transaction recorded in financial statements
5. Received cash
Purchases cycle system stages
1. Requisition
2. Order is placed
3. Goods are received
4. Received invoice from supplier
5. Invoice is recorded on accounts system
6. Sent payment to supplier
Control system for assets would work same as purchase system with some additional controls
required due to the size of the values spent on these items in comparison to the standard goods
such
1. Authorization of costs
2. Use of asset register, this should be updated and reviewed regularly and compared to the
accounting system to ensure there are no errors
Inventory Cycle
Payroll cycle
Cash System
Objectives
Risks
Effective control
If a substantive procedure doesn’t address an assertion, it does not assist in forming an audit opinion
CRAVE POCC
C – Completeness
A – Accuracy
E – Existence
P – Presentation
O – Occurrence
C – Classification
C – Cut off
Gathering Evidence
1. Control Procedure
2. Substantive procedure
Control procedures are procedures which identify whether the control systems being reviewed
actually work
Control procedure = The evidence should be such that it helps to identify whether the control
system operates effectively
Substantive procedure = The evidence should at least achieve one of the financial statements
assertions so that these assertions can help auditor conclude whether financial statements are true
and fair
Evidence should be
Independent
Obtained directly
Written
Original form
ISA 500 = 8 methods to design audit procedures for both controls and substantive testing
The application of audit procedure to less than 100% of items within a population of audit
relevance such that all sampling units have a chance of selection in order to provide the auditor
with a reasonable basis on which to draw conclusions about the entire population
Sampling Risk, sample size should be sufficient to reduce sampling risk to an acceptable level
T = Trial Balance
O = Opening Balance
D = Disclosure check
1. Financial Statements
2. Asset Ledger
3. Trial Balance and ledger accounts
1. Completeness
2. Rights and obligation
3. Valuation
4. Existence
IAS 2 –
Inventory should be valued at the lower of
1. Cost
2. NRV
1. Accruals
2. Provisions – IAS 37
Remote Chance – Include Nothing
Possible Chance – Include contingent liability note
Probable Chance – Include Note and provision
3. Other payables
Sales Tax
Employee Tax
Payroll
Bank Overdraft
4. Trade Payables
Total Balance of all outstanding balances owed to trade suppliers
Audit procedures will include
1. Cut-off testing
2. Reconciling supplier statements
3. Post year end invoice review
4. Analytical Procedure
Director Emoluments
Key Assertions
1. Cut-off
2. Occurrence
3. Completeness
4. Classification
5. Accuracy
1. Control tests
2. Risk assessment
3. Special investigation
Aim
Identify events that have happened post year end but that impact current audited financial
statements
Auditor must identify any posterior events and apply them to post year events to IAS 10
Carry out audit procedures during the review of the audit using = IAS 560
IAS 10
1. Adjusting Events = Discovered after the year end = Evidence existed at reporting date
Customer communicated inability to pay after year end
2. Non adjusting events = Material events where conditions did not exist at the reporting date
but arose after, they are material enough that they need to disclosed in the report to the
users
Refusal to provide written representation, some specific steps must be followed by the auditor
1. Discuss with management the reason for not providing WR and explain the importance of
WR to the client
2. Consider integrity of the client and the reliability of the internal evidence
3. No sufficient appropriate evidence if the WR is not provided to the auditor therefore the
auditor will have to modify the audit report with disclaimer stating that they are unable to
form an opinion
1. Overall Review
2. Evaluation of misstatements
3. Subsequent event review
4. Going Concern Review
5. Obtaining Written Representation Review
Final report at the end of the audit process, given to the management and the shareholders of the
entity
Regulations
Why?
Therefore, they will have to modify the audit report with qualified opinion
Then they will have to decide whether it is material or material and pervasive
Material and pervasive meaning it is significant to users, in simple terms it makes the matter is so
fundamental that the FS are unreliable
ISA 260 and ISA 265
1. Engagement letter
2. Management Letter
3. Audit Report