Block 05c 7tools Quality
Block 05c 7tools Quality
Antonio Moschitta
Introduction
➢ Principles:
1. Customer satisfaction
2. Quality improvement
3. Application of quality tools
4. Education and training
5. Leadership
Introduction
➢ Method PDCA
1. Check Sheet
2. Stratification – Flowchart – run-chart
3. Pareto Diagram
4. Cause-Effect Diagram
5. Scatter Diagram
6. Histogram
7. Control Chart
NOTES
◼ The Seven Tools are a heterogeneous set of techniques, which include
methods based on measurement data, prior knowledge, brainstorming
techniques and the application of statistical techniques.
◼ The Seven Tools are structured in such a way as to require a level of
technical knowledge, in particular statistics, which depends on the point of
view of those who approach them.
◼ Planning their use in a given context may require a rather high level of
knowledge (Ex: what parameters need to be measured? How accurately?
How often? How many measurements need to be taken?).
◼ Conversely, once the planning phase is complete, actual use requires an
average level of knowledge, suitable for use by personnel directly involved
in production
1. Check Sheet
◼ Distribution of
continuous
quantities
1. Check Sheet
◼ Defect position
https://qctraininginc.com/7-quality-tools/
1. Check Sheet
◼ Synthesis
1. Check Sheet
◼ Synthesis
1. Check Sheet
◼ Confirmation
of execution
1. Check Sheet
◼ Confirmation
of execution
2. Stratification
◼ What is it?
Method of classifying data into homogeneous
groups
Powerful tool for determining how a factor in
the manufacturing process affects product
characteristics
Logical subdivisions = stratification factors
(time, operators, machines, material, controls)
Purpose: to identify the weight of certain
factors on the overall result, through
comparison between global and stratified data
2. Stratification
◼ Layering application steps:
Define the phenomenon/characteristic to be
analyzed
Represent the overall relative data
Identify the most appropriate stratification
factors
Classify existing data into homogeneous
groups
Graph each group of data
Compare homogeneous groups within each
stratification factor to detect differences
2. Stratification
https://www.conceptdraw.com/examples/flowchart-definition
2. A Flowchart example: Order Process
https://www.conceptdraw.com/examples/flowchart-definition
2. Run chart
◼ A run chart, also known as run-sequence plot, is
a graph that displays observed data in a time
sequence.
◼ A run charts can show the performance of a
process (e.g. quality or productivity indicators)
over time in a graphical fashion
https://upload.wik
imedia.org/wikipe
dia/commons/d/d
f/SimpleRunChar
t.jpg
2. Run chart
◼ Run charts also help identifying process
changes and trends over time and show the
effects of corrective actions.
◼ Control Charts extend the capabilities of the Run
Chart
https://upload.wik
imedia.org/wikipe
dia/commons/d/d
f/SimpleRunChar
t.jpg
3. Pareto Diagram
https://www.qimacros.com/pareto-chart-excel/pareto-analysis/
3. Pareto Diagram
3. Pareto Diagram
https://support.sas.com/documentation/cdl/en/qcug/63922/HTML/default/viewer.htm#q
cug_pareto_a0000000961.htm
4. Cause-Effect Diagram
◼ Construction (1)
Three methods:
1) Classification of causes
2) Steps in the process
3) List of causes
4. Cause-Effect Diagram
◼ Construction (2)
1.Classification of causes:
1. Step 1 → choose the effect you want to analyze
(circumscribed, well known)
2. Step 2 → identify causes
◼ Construction (3)
1.Classification of causes:
4M: Methods, Materials, Machines, Manpower
5M: Methods, Materials, Machines, Manpower, Milieu
8M: Methods, Materials, Machines, Manpower, Milieu,
Management, Measurements, Money
4. Cause-Effect Diagram
◼ Construction (4)
1. Classification of causes:
Step 3 → Identification of major categories of causes
man machine
. Cause-Effect Diagram
4.
.
◼ Construction (5)
1. Classification of causes:
Step 4 → Identification of causes for each major category
Electrical system
man machine
dirty
Spark plugs
4. Cause-Effect Diagram
◼ Construction (6)
1.Classification of causes:
Step 5 → include in the diagram all the factors that can
affect the effect
4. Cause-Effect Diagram
https://images.saymedia-content.com/.image/t_share/MTc2MzE1MzI4MDM1MzY2MDYx/fishbone-diagram-ishikawa-diagram-
continuous-process-improvement.gif
4. Cause-Effect Diagram
https://www.gov.scot/binaries/content/gallery/publications/independent-report/2020/11/root-cause-analysis-care-home-
outbreaks/SCT10204672081_g00.gif
4. Cause-Effect Diagram
◼ Construction (7)
2. Classification by process steps:
• Identify sequential steps and identify them with block
diagram
• Analyze all the phases to find the causes
• Useful for sequential process-dependent effects
4. Cause-Effect Diagram
◼ Construction (8)
3. List of causes:
• List of all possible causes
• Structuring Cases to Highlight Relationships
4. Cause-Effect Diagram
◼ Preparation
1. Collaboration with other people interested in the
problem
2. Don’t forget factors belonging to Major Categories
of Causes
3. Consider errors as causes
4. Separate Diagrams for specific effects
4. Cause-Effect Diagram
◼ Analysis
1) Identify the most likely causes
2) Define the most important causes
3) Organize the most important cases
4) Verify the causes starting from the most important
5) Design of verifications
◼ Use
1. Find the effect you want to analyze
2. Choose the most suitable method for construction
3. Diagram Construction
4. Classification of causes
5. Verification of the validity of causes
6. Corrective actions
4. Cause-Effect Diagram
◼ Fields of application
1. Process Improvement
2. Corrective actions
3. Development of standard operating procedures
4. Educational Use
5. Discussion Guide
6. Verification of the technical level of knowledge
7. Knowledge Sharing
4. Cause-Effect Diagram
◼ Pros
Stimulates creativity in the search for causes
Categorizes possible causes
Diagramming in teams opens up new perspectives
Causes can be represented
Encourage employees to come up with ideas
Simplifies the problem
It is easy to apply and learn
4. Cause-Effect Diagram
◼ Cons
Requires discipline and simplification to ensure that the
diagram retains its usefulness
Predefined categories (e.g. 5 M) can limit creative approaches
to problem-solving
Complex connections cannot be represented in the Ishikawa
diagram
Doesn't provide solutions, but only displays causes
5. Scatter Plot
◼ What is it?
◼ Preparation (1):
1. Gather and order data
Velocity Cut Velocity Cut
Number Number
[cm/s] Length [cm/s] Length
5. Scatter Plot
◼ Preparation (2):
1. Plot data
1055
1050
1045
1040
lungh. tagliata
Cut Length
1035
1030
1025
1020
1015
1010
1005
0 2 4 6 8 10
velocità del trasportatore
Velocity [cm/s]
5. Scatter Plot
◼ Interpretation (1):
1. Positive correlation
◼ Interpretation (2):
3. No correlation
4. There may be a negative correlation
5. Negative Correlation
5. Scatter Plot
◼ Evaluation (1):
Sign-test: Hypothesis testing to decide whether one random variable is
greater than another. Deciding whether there is a positive or negative
correlation is the same as deciding whether the sum of the points
contained in quadrants I-III exceeds the sum of the points contained in
quadrants II-IV. The coordinates of the axes are given by the medians of
the horizontal and vertical coordinate sets
1055
1050
1045 II I Area Points
1040
I 19
tagliata
1035
Cut Length
1030
II 4
III 20
lungh.
1025
1020 IV 5
1015 On lines 2
1010 III IV ____
1005
0 2 4 6 8 10
Total 50
Velocity
velocità [cm/s]
del trasportatore
1035
1030
1025
1020
1015
1010
1005
0 2 4 6 8 10
velocità del trasportatore
Velocity [cm/s]
5. Scatter Plot
◼ Evaluation (2):
Sign-test: By iterating the procedure in the sub-quadrants, it is possible to
estimate the level of correlation between the two quantities by drawing the line
that joins the centers of symmetry. A more rigorous alternative is the
evaluation of the correlation coefficient by linear regression on the data
1055
1050
1045
1040
Pearson correlation coefficient
lungh. tagliata
Cut Length
1035
1030 σ𝑁
𝑛=1 𝑥𝑛 − 𝑥ҧ 𝑦𝑛 − 𝑦
ത
1025
𝑟𝑥𝑦 =
1020 σ𝑁
𝑛=1 𝑥𝑛 − 𝑥ҧ
2 𝑦𝑛 − 𝑦ത 2
1015
1010 1 1
1005 𝑥ҧ = 𝑁 σ𝑁
𝑛=1 𝑥𝑛 , 𝑦ത = 𝑁 σ𝑁
𝑛=1 𝑦𝑛
0 2 4 6 8 10
velocità del trasportatore
Velocity [cm/s]
5. Scatter Plot
Range of production
values
Product characteristic
Process parameter
5. Scatter Plot
Limits:
◼ The correlation diagram does not allow us to infer cause-and-effect
relationships (In the absence of other information, it can be concluded
either that parameter 1 influences parameter 2, or that parameter 2
influences parameter 1, or that there are one or more additional factors
that influence both parameters 1 and 2)
◼ The correlation plot can lead to incorrect conclusions if used
inappropriately (if there is a third quantity influencing parameters 1 and 2,
the results of the correlation diagram can be misleading)
5. Scatter Plot
Ex.: plot the x1- x3 e x2- x3 cross-plots for the data shown in the table.
What kind of correlation is highlighted by the two cross-plots?
Data point x1 x2 x3
1 -2 1 10
2 -1 -2 5
3 0 -5 0
5. Scatter Plot
Ex. (continued): plot the x1-x3 e x2-x3 cross-plots for the data shown in the table
(extends the previous table)
Are the conclusions the same as before?
Data point x1 x2 x3
1 -2 1 10
2 -1 -2 5
3 0 -5 0
4 1 2 15
5 2 -1 10
6 1 -2 7
7 2 1 14
8 0 0 10
9 3 2 17
10 1 -3 5
11 1 -5 1
5. Scatter Plot
The ambiguity of the results is due both to the insignificant size of the
sample represented by the first table, which leads to an incorrect
conclusion, and to an inadequate use of the tool, as the estimation of the
correlation between two variables is influenced from time to time by the
third variable
Possible stratification criterion: pairs (x1, x3) characterized by the same
value assumed by x2
PRINCIPLES OF OPERATION OF A
SYSTEM
Plant 1 Plant 2
Successes 1000 95
method 1
Failures method 9000 5
1
Successes 50 5000
method 2
Failures method 950 5000
2
PRINCIPLES OF OPERATION OF A
SYSTEM
◼ The second method is inferior to the first in both
implants!
◼ The paradox is because the numerousness of data
sets collected in the two plants were not chosen
adequately
PRINCIPLES OF OPERATION OF A
SYSTEM
◼ Statistical view (2):
◼ "Statistics is the fundamental discipline for interpreting
data variability"
◼ What drives data variability?
Natural Variability (System under Statistical Control)
Accidental Variability (System out of Statistical Control)
PRINCIPLES OF OPERATION OF A
SYSTEM
◼ Statistical view (3):
◼ Natural variability:
It depends on how the process was designed and
implemented (inherently imperfect knowledge of the factors
involved)
It is stable over time (steady-state context)
The magnitude of the data dispersion can be estimated It is an
intrinsic aspect of the process, which does not require
corrective action
Can be reduced through improvements
PRINCIPLES OF OPERATION OF A
SYSTEM
◼ Statistical view (4):
◼ Accidental variability:
System disturbance due to sudden and undesirable changes
in one or more influencing factors (process inputs)
The mean and dispersion of measurement data are generally
not stationary, and may exhibit undesirable variations
It is the cause of frequent non-conformities in the output of a
process
Requires corrective action to identify and eliminate the cause
PRINCIPLES OF OPERATION OF A
SYSTEM
◼ Statistical view (5):
A process is in a state of statistical control when there are no
causes of accidental variability
In the context of process control, it is essential to identify the
occurrence of accidental causes of variability at an early
stage, in order to take corrective action
The occurrence of an accidental cause of variability can be
detected by analyzing the variations induced by it in the
distribution of measurement data and related statistics (mean,
standard deviation, etc.)
PRINCIPLES OF OPERATION OF A
SYSTEM
◼ What is it?
Graphic tool
Tool used to represent data
Data Probability Density Estimator
It has fundamental elements
6. HISTOGRAM
◼ Fundamental elements
▪ Class = bar
▪ Class Limits = Minimum and Maximum
▪ Value Class Amplitude = Max-Min Range
▪ Frequency = number of observations
40 class
35
30
25
20 amplitude
15
10 frequency
5
0
limits
6. HISTOGRAM
◼ Construction (1)
Determine the maximum data excursion “R”
◼ Construction (2)
◼ Define the number of classes, the class range (h),
the class limits:
◼ The excursion R is divided into classes of equal
amplitude
◼ The number of classes is denoted by k and is
chosen according to the number of data N
Example: 𝑘 = 𝑁 𝑘 = 100 = 10
◼ The class range is obtained as (xmax-xmin)/k
Example h=0.38/10=0.038 (unwieldy range, you
can choose h=0.05 and then k=0.38/0.05= 8)
6. HISTOGRAM
◼ Construction (3)
◼ The histogram estimates the probability density, and the
number of classes is a trade-off between two conflicting
requirements
◼ Given the number of measurements, too many classes
leads to "jagged" histograms, i.e., the classes tend to be
populated in a way that can greatly differ from the
probabilities they estimate (the variance of the estimator is
too high)
◼ Conversely, a small number of classes leads to reliable
estimates, but reduces the amount of information obtained
6. HISTOGRAM
◼ Construction (4)
Define the number of classes, the class range (h),
the class limits:
Define class boundaries starting with the minimum value
(3.30) and increasing it by 0.05 for each class
Class I = 3.30 – 3.35
◼ Construction (5)
Classify data in a frequency table:
The data is recorded in the relevant classes
Attendance is calculated for each class
◼ Construction (6)
Plot the histogram
Specifications
6. HISTOGRAM
◼ Interpretation (1)
Use to learn about data structure
Analyze shape and placement against specifications:
25 25
20
20
15
15
10
10
5
5 0
0
◼ Possible interpretation: average and dispersion of the process such as to exceed the
measuring range of the instrumentation used
6. HISTOGRAM
40
35
30
◼ Interpretation (4) 25
20
Shape Analysis: 15
10
5
0
◼ Interpretation (5)
Positioning against specifications: adequate
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
6. HISTOGRAM
◼ Interpretation (6)
Positioning against specifications: mean shift
6. HISTOGRAM
◼ Interpretation (7)
Positioning against specifications: dispersion too wide
A stratification may be needed
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
1
6. HISTOGRAM
◼ Limitations (1)
The histogram is a powerful tool for accurately determining the
probabilistic distribution of an observed parameter, as long as the
context is stationary.
The onset of an accidental cause, however, is a typical event of a
non-stationary context
The histogram estimates the distribution of the phenomenon after
acquiring all the data and does not use the information brought
by the instant of acquisition of each measurement.
The same data, captured in a different order, produces the same
histogram.
As a result, the histogram is an instrument that is not very
sensitive to the onset of accidental causes, which are not
detected in a timely manner
6. HISTOGRAM
◼ Limitations (2)
Any deviation of the observed process mean from an m1 value to
an m2 value can be manifested by a bimodal histogram.
However, the histogram does not allow us to conclude which of
m1 and m2 was the initial mean, or even at what point in time the
mean of the process began to deviate from one value to another.
Similarly, an increase in the dispersion of data due to an
accidental cause results in a histogram that is less concentrated
about its axis of symmetry and does not even allow the
conclusion that the process is not in a state of statistical control.
These limits are exceeded by the Control Chart, which allows you
to determine the status of a process by making a series of short-
term averages
7. CONTROL CHART
◼ What is it?
Dynamic Representation Tool
A tool that allows you to follow the temporal evolution of a
parameter
A tool that allows you to assess whether a process is in a state
of statistical control (values within limits)
A tool that allows you to evaluate whether a process is not in a
statistical control state (values outside the limits)
7. CONTROL CHART
◼ Example: 30
Upper Control Limit
29
28
Lower Control Limit
0 10 20 30 40
1
20 days 0
5 data per day Lower Control Limit
7. CONTROL CHART
◼ Types:
1. Continuous Data Charts
𝑋ത − 𝑅 charts (measurement-based data)
Average values and excursions are displayed
◼ Use (1):
◼ Process Analysis
Instrument used for a defined time
Requires at least 100 data points for a total of 20-25
subgroups
Never deliberately change the operating conditions
Find out if the process is or not under statistical control
Identify special causes responsible for a process that is
not under statistical control
Remove special causes to bring the process under
statistical control
Define control chart limits and therefore the natural
variability of the process
7. CONTROL CHART
◼ Use (2):
◼ Process Control
After analysis, process control begins
Comparison of natural limits and process behavior
Corrective Action
7. CONTROL CHART
◼ Use (3):
◼ Process Control
Conclusions drawn from the Control Charts are valid at less
than a degree of confidence
: Probability of Error of the First Kind (False Positive,
False Alarm)
: Probability of Error of the Second Kind (False Negative,
No Alarm)
The selection of control limits corresponds to a compromise
solution between the two types of error.
7. CONTROL CHART
◼ Use (4):
◼ Some parameters
Central Line (CL), Upper Control Limit (UCL), Lower
Control Limit (LCL), Upper Warning Limit (UWL), Lower
Warning Limit (LWL)
Average Run Length
.
7. CONTROL CHART
𝑋1 + 𝑋1 + 𝑋3 + ⋯ + 𝑋𝑘
𝑋ത =
𝑘
7. CONTROL CHART
Average Excursion :
for the i-th group, evaluate 𝑅𝑖 = 𝑋𝑚𝑎𝑥,𝑖 − 𝑋𝑚𝑖𝑛,𝑖
X = 12.94
13
𝑋ത
LCL = 12.161
12
UCL = 2.86
3
2 R = 1.35
R
1
5 10 15
0 Sub-groups
7. CONTROL CHART
3 𝑝(100 − 𝑝)
𝑈𝐶𝐿 = 𝑝 +
𝑛
3 𝑝(100 − 𝑝)
𝐿𝐶𝐿 = 𝑝 −
𝑛
◼ Introduction:
“Control" for the CWQC
◼ Maintenance
◼ Improvement
PDCA methodological approach to ensure effective
control
The PDCA METHOD
◼ 4 Steps:
◼ Three sub-cycles:
1. Maintenance cycle
yes
CHECK ACTION:
MAINTAIN AS IT IS
FOLLOW-UP
The PDCA METHOD
◼ Three sub-cycles :
2. Corrective action cycle
PLAN DO CHECK
ACTION:
REMEDY NO
ACTION:
RECURRENT
PREVENTION
The PDCA METHOD
◼ Three sub-cycles :
3. Improvement cycle
FOLLOW - UP
IMPROVEMENT
The PDCA METHOD