PM USHA Final Guidelines

Ministry of Education
Department of Higher Education
PRADHAN MANTRI UCHCHATAR

SHIKSHA ABHIYAN
(PM-USHA)
GUIDELINES
Ministry of Education
Department of Higher Education
PRADHAN MANTRI UCHCHATAR SHIKSHA ABHIYAN

(PM-USHA)
GUIDELINES
(June 2023)
Page 1
Pradhan Mantri Uchchatar Shiksha Abhiyan (PM-USHA)
Guidelines
INDEX
CHAPTERS TOPIC PAGE

NO.
CHAPTER-I INTRODUCTION 3
CHAPTER-II INSTITUTIONAL STRUCTURE 8
CHAPTER-III OBJECTIVES OF PM-USHA 9
CHAPTER-IV SCOPE OF PM-USHA 10
CHAPTER-V COMPONENTS UNDER PM-USHA 12
CHAPTER-VI ACTIVITIES UNDER COMPONENTS OF 13
PM-USHA
CHAPTER-VII OUTPUT-OUTCOMES UNDER 20
COMPONENTS OF PM-USHA
CHAPTER-VIII SHORT-LISTING CRITERIA UNDER 27
CHAPTER-IX COMPONENT 5 - MANAGEMENT 42
MONITORING EVALUATION AND
RESEARCH (MMER)
CHAPTER - X MONITORING AND EVALUATION 43
CHAPTER-XI MENTORING 44
CHAPTER-XII FUNDING SUPPORT 45
CHAPTER XIII MoU WITH STATE GOVERNMENTS 46
Page 2
CHAPTER-I : INTRODUCTION
1. Rashtriya Uchchatar Shiksha Abhiyan (RUSA) was a Centrally Sponsored Scheme
to fund States/UTs institutions, with the vision to attain higher levels of access,
equity, and excellence in the State higher education system with greater efficiency,
transparency, accountability, and responsiveness. The first phase of the scheme
was launched in 2013 and the second phase was launched in 2018. Now, in the
light of the National Education Policy, RUSA scheme has been launched as
Pradhan Mantri Uchchatar Shiksha Abhiyan (PM-USHA).
2. It covers government and government-aided institutions of the States and UTs. As

the demand for higher education is increasing continuously over the years, there
has been an unprecedented expansion in the number of institutions, universities,
and volume of students in the country.
3. As per the AISHE report 2020-21, there are 1,113 Universities, 43,796 Colleges,
and 11,296 Stand Alone Institutions. There are 422 State Public Universities that
have 41,836 affiliated colleges. 446 Universities are privately managed and 475
Universities are located in rural areas, 17 are women-centric universities. 78.6%
Colleges are privately managed (65% Private-unaided and 13.6% Private-aided).
There are 35.8% of Colleges, which run only single programmes, out of which
82.2% are privately managed.
4. Total enrolment in higher education has been estimated to be 4.13 crores with 2.12
crores boys and 2.01 crores females. Females constitute 48.7% of the total
enrolment. Out of the total enrolment of 4.13 crores students, a vast majority of 3.26
crores students are enrolled in Under-Graduate is an approx. 78.09% of the total
enrolment. On the other hand, 11.5% of students are enrolled in Post-Graduation
which is approximately 47.16 lakh students. There are 2,255 students enrolled in
Integrated Ph.D. in addition to 2.11 lakh students enrolled in Ph.D. Level. To take
advantage of the demographic dividend, there was a need for a concerted effort
that would improve the quality and relevance of higher education and result in more
employability.
5. Out of this whole universe of institutions, RUSA 1.0 & 2.0 has catered to
approximately 2500 institutions for improving access, equity, and quality under 16
components. A total of 2,972 units were approved, out of which approx. 1000
projects have been completed and the rest are ongoing. As per the previous
evaluation reports of RUSA 1.0 & 2.0, it is very much evident that the scheme has
had a considerable and targeted impact.
6. RUSA 1.0 and RUSA 2.0 have already worked diligently and there has been
significant progress on a number of higher educational indicators like Gross
Enrollment Ratio (GER), and Accreditation (Quality Reforms), Student-Teacher
ratio, etc. However, the gap still remains vis-à-vis. access, inclusion, enrolment,
quality enhancement, skilling, employability, technology, etc. and therefore, some
new interventions are required for achieving the targets and reducing the gaps,
ensuring better output and outcome.
7. PM-USHA aims to address the key gaps and issues identified in the Evaluation
Report of Centrally Sponsored Schemes by the NITI Aayog. The report suggested
Page 3
that the subsumed scheme should be redesigned for rationalization and higher
impact. The intention is to focus on improving graduate employability through
funding for the promotion of market-linked courses, industry connects, student
internships, etc; rigorously tracking and monitoring employability outcomes of HEIs;
introducing skill-based education for students, and identification of the critical skill
gaps in graduates across various disciplines, suitable skill-based, and employment-
led vocational courses/ modules; promotion of technology and Open Distance
Learning interventions in higher education institutions to leverage technology for
promoting access and quality; support to institutes for improvement in NAAC
accreditation grades; more emphasis on quality initiatives; promotion of higher
uptake of e-learning/ virtual learning; tracking outputs/ outcomes of scheme
interventions; promotion of community participation, gender sensitization, etc.
8. National Education Policy 2020 (NEP) is a guiding force in preparing the base for
PM-USHA. NEP has identified some of the major problems currently faced by the
higher education system in India, which are:
a. A severely fragmented higher educational ecosystem; less emphasis on the
development of cognitive skills and learning outcomes;
b. A rigid separation of disciplines, early specialization, and streaming of
students into narrow areas of study;
c. Limited access particularly in socio-economically disadvantaged areas,
with few HEIs that teach in local languages;
d. Limited teacher and institutional autonomy;
e. Inadequate mechanisms for merit-based career management and
progression of faculty and institutional leaders;
f. Lesser emphasis on research at most universities and colleges, and lack of
competitive peer-reviewed research funding across disciplines;
g. Suboptimal governance and leadership of HEIs;
h. An ineffective regulatory system; and large affiliating universities result in
low standards of undergraduate education.
9. With the recent emergence of the NEP 2020 and recommendations of NITI Aayog,
an effort has been made to give a new and energized structure to the upcoming
phase of the scheme. It aims to cater to the five pillars of the NEP 2020, viz.
accessibility, quality, equity, accountability, and affordability along with skill-based/
vocational education, employability, courses in emerging areas, industry-academia
linkage, accreditation of un-accredited institutions, choice-based credit system,
academic reforms, ODL & ICT usage, barrier-free education and increasing GER.
Under the PM-USHA priority would be given to the “Focus Districts”.
PM-USHA would be focusing on the following:
A. Equity, Access, and Inclusion:
10. As per the AISHE report (FY 2020-21), GER in higher education in India is 27.3,
which is calculated for the 18-23 years of age group. GER for the male population
is 26.7 and for females, it is 27.9. For Scheduled Castes, it is 23.1 and for Scheduled
Tribes, it is 18.9 as compared to the National GER of 27.1. Scheduled Caste
Page 4
students constitute 14.2% and Scheduled Tribes students 5.8% of the total
enrolment, 35.8% students belong to Other Backward Classes, and 44.2% students
are from other communities. In addition, there are more than 78.6% of colleges
running in the private sector; aided and unaided taken together, but it caters to only
65.5% of the total enrolment. About 78.09% of the students are enrolled in
undergraduate level programs, 61.4% of colleges are located in rural areas, 10.5%
of colleges are exclusively for females, 24.5% of the colleges are having an
enrolment of less than 100, and only 4% of colleges have an enrolment of more
than 3000.
11. The above statistics show the scope for enhancement in equity, access, and
inclusion and hence the scheme focuses on equity initiatives and gender inclusion
by providing adequate opportunities to underprivileged groups, and it promotes the
inclusion of women, minorities, SCs/STs/OBCs, and specially-abled people in
higher education, which will help to increase the GER. Furthermore, the language
barrier for learners must be removed, and multilingualism, such as mother
tongue/local and regional languages as a medium of instruction, should be
promoted, increasing accessibility among different courses and allowing learners to
develop an artistic, creative, cultural, and academic path.
B. Developing Quality Teaching & Learning processes:
12. For providing a quality higher education a comprehensive, holistic, and integrated
education ecosystem would be required which can be achieved through the
inclusion of innovative and adaptable curricular structures, engaging innovative
pedagogy, continuous formative assessment, and student support. This would also
require innovative and interdisciplinary study combinations along with multiple entry
and exit systems by eradicating rigid boundaries currently in place. This could be
achieved by strengthening the existing higher education institutions, faculty, and
students.
13. PM-USHA would provide the facilities to the institution for upgrading the physical
and digital infrastructure and also for the conversion of single-stream higher
education institutions (HEIs) into multiple streams institutions.
14. To improve the quality of teaching, faculty training would be supported especially
with the help of digital infrastructure. Institutions would also be facilitated to form
alliances with Pandit Madan Mohan Malviya National Mission on Teachers and
Teaching (PMMMNMTT) and University Grant Commission’s Human Resource
Development Centres for Resource Sharing for the use of existing content in a
digitized format for the enhancement of the teaching-learning process.
15. For improving the quality of learning, the Multiple Entry & Exit system, Choice-based
Credit System (CBCS), and Academic Bank of Credit (ABC) would all be supported
and prioritized sharply under PM-USHA. HEIs would be encouraged to adhere to
the National Curriculum Framework provided by the UGC for better education for
the learners.
Page 5
C. Accreditation of Non-Accredited Institutions & Improving Accreditation:
16. Accreditation pushes institutions to meet and maintain higher standards in

education, in turn, increases trust and confidence in them among the public and
boosts accountability.
17. National Assessment and Accreditation Council (NAAC), is a national accreditation

agency that ensures the overall performance and quality of HEIs. NAAC conducts
assessment and accreditation of HEIs such as colleges, universities, or other
recognized institutions to derive an understanding of the ‘Quality Status’ of the
institution. NAAC also evaluates the institutions for their conformance to the
standards of quality in terms of their performance related to the educational
processes and outcomes, curriculum coverage, teaching-learning processes,
faculty, research, infrastructure, learning resources, organization, governance, and
financial well-being, and student services.
18. The information available on the NAAC portal, as on 19.05.2023, reveals that out
of 1113 universities, 43796 colleges, and 11,779 stand-alone institutions only 430
universities and 9257 colleges have been NAAC accredited. Hence, it has emerged
that there are a limited number of HEIs with NAAC accreditation, a few are with low
CGPA, and some HEIs are without accreditation which will get hand-holding under
the scheme for getting accreditation as well as enhancing accreditations from NAAC
for fulfilling the criteria such as Curricular Aspects, Teaching-Learning Evaluation,
Student Support and Progression, Government Leadership and Management,
Institutional Values and Best Practices.
D. ICT-based Digital Infrastructure:
19. To ensure greater access to education, there is the significant importance of

technology in bridging the language barrier between teachers and students,
creating digital libraries, popularizing language learning as well as introducing the
Open distance learning (ODL) programs. HEIs should be encouraged to design,
develop, and roll out MOOCs for learners & teachers as well as institutions and
faculties would be mentored for enhancing the online teaching-learning processes
and capacity building under programmes like PMMMNMTT, SWAYAM, SWAYAM
Prabha, etc.
20. ICT efforts, like the National Digital Library, DigiLocker, e-Shodh Sindu, and virtual
laboratories will use and give students a virtual platform for their learning
opportunities. For enhancing the teacher’s capacity in ICT tools, the scheme would
also concentrate on the faculty development programme. Accredited and non-
accredited colleges are established connections with the present online teaching-
learning materials offered by numerous national and international platforms to
enhance learning opportunities. With the implementation of ICT Digital
Infrastructure under PM-USHA, institutions would be encouraged to provide Wi-Fi
facilities, smart classes, and virtual labs on the institute campuses. The Digital
Infrastructure facilities will enable and empower students – teachers to achieve
expected learning outcomes.
Page 6
E. Enhancing Employability through Multidisciplinarity :
21. Collaboration between industry and academia is key to catalyzing innovation and
growth in career building. PM-USHA will encourage the HEIs to get linked with the
Industry and the Market to strengthen skills, innovations, and employability. PM-
USHA will focus on the establishment of employment cells to create linkages
between Academia, Industry, and the Market. It also ensures rigorous tracking and
monitoring of employability through market-linked courses and emphasizes the
development of cognitive skills and learning outcomes.
Page 7
CHAPTER-II : INSTITUTIONAL STRUCTURE
1. PM-USHA shall be implemented and monitored through an institutional

structure of bodies with clearly defined roles and powers at the Central, State,
and institutional levels. All the bodies shall monitor the progress of the scheme
at their respective levels, starting right from the institutional level up to the
national level.
A. CENTRAL LEVEL STRUCTURE
2. The central level structure comprises four bodies namely
a) National Mission Authority (NMA) which would be chaired by Hon’ble

Education Minister, GoI
b) Project Approval Board (PAB) which would be chaired by Secretary (Higher
Education), GoI
c) National Project Directorate (NPD)
d) Technical Support Group (TSG)
B. STATE LEVEL STRUCTURE
3. State level structure is comprised of three bodies namely
a) State Higher Education Council (SHEC)

b) State Project Directorate (SPD)
c) State Technical Support Group (State-TSG)
C. INSTITUTIONAL LEVEL STRUCTURE
4. The project at the institutional level is managed by two bodies:
a) Board of Governors (BOGs)

b) Project Monitoring Unit (PMU)
Page 8
CHAPTER-III : OBJECTIVES OF PM-USHA
The objectives of the scheme are:
1. To improve the overall quality of existing state higher educational institutions by

ensuring their conformity to prescribed norms and standards and adoption of
accreditation as a quality assurance framework;
2. Usher transformative reforms in the State higher education system by creating a
facilitating institutional structure for planning and monitoring at the state level,
promoting autonomy in State Universities, and improving governance in
institutions;
3. Implemention of recommendations of the NEP 2020 through funding support
provided to State HEIs;
4. Ensure governance, academic, and examination (and evaluation) reforms in the
State higher educational institutions and establish backward and forward linkages
with school education on one hand and employment market, on the other hand, to
facilitate self-reliance and thus creating an Atma-Nirbhar Bharat;
5. Create an enabling atmosphere in the higher educational institutions to devote
themselves to research and innovations;
6. Correct regional imbalances in access to higher education by facilitating access
to high-quality institutions in urban & semi‐urban areas, creating opportunities for
students from rural areas to get access to better quality institutions, and setting up
institutions in unserved & underserved areas;
7. Developing infrastructure for ODL/Online/Digital mode of education in such
States/UTs;
8. Improve equity in higher education by providing adequate opportunities for higher
education to socially deprived communities; promote inclusion of women,
minorities, SC/ST/OBCs, and special-abled persons;
9. To identify and fill up the existing gaps in higher education, by augmenting and
supporting the State Governments’ efforts;
10. Enhancing employability through skilling and vocationalization;
11. Improving accreditation status of accredited institutions and getting accreditation
of non-accredited institutions;
12. Providing better hostel facilities in remote areas;
13. Establishing New Model Degree Colleges in the districts where there are no
Government and Government-aided institutions;
14. Focusing on low GER, Left Wing Extremism (LWE), border area districts,
aspirational districts and districts with higher SC/ ST population; and
15. Focus on multidisciplinary education, including STEM, commerce and humanities
fields of education.
Page 9
CHAPTER-IV : SCOPE OF PM-USHA
1. The scope of the Scheme is as follows:
Focus Districts:
2. Under the scheme, priority would be given to the Focus Districts. The focus districts
shall be identified by the concerned States/UTs subject to a maximum of 50% of
their districts considering the lack of access to government colleges and the
proportion of disadvantaged categories such as SC/STs/OBCs/Women and
remote/aspirational districts.
3. States would identify the Focus Districts on the basis of the following indicators:
a) Low GER
b) Population proportion and enrollment proportion for Females, transgenders,
SCs, STs and OBCs
c) Aspirational/ Border Area/ Left Wing Extremism prone district
d) Gender parity
4. The recommendation of institutions shall be done by the State/ UT Governments/

State Higher Education Council (SHEC). The final decision shall be taken by the
Centre.
Institutions:
5. One of the major scopes of PM-USHA would be helping institutions in getting/

improving accreditation. The selection methodology shall be based on the
challenge method.
6. Process of Selection through Challenge Method: Although the components

proposed under PM-USHA are open-ended but the number of units is limited so the
selection of institutions would be done through the challenge method. The stages
of selection through the challenge method are as follows:
A. First Stage: At the first stage the States/UTs would sign an MoU with the MoE. The
MoU would include, inter alia, commitment from States regarding:
i. Implementation of NEP reforms

ii. Supporting all govt and govt aided institutions in applying for accreditation
iii. Adoption of Guidelines on National Credit Framework (NCrF) and Choice
Based Credit System (CBCS) for Four Year Undergraduate Programme
(FYUP).
Page 10
B. Second Stage: The Universities, Colleges and Districts would be shortlisted by the
State Governments by giving priority to the focus districts for getting support under the
Component 2 i.e. 'Grants to Strengthen Universities' and Component 3, i.e. 'Grants to
Strengthen Colleges,', respectively. Further, the State Governments would also
choose the list of districts by giving priority to the focus districts in their State, to be
supported under Component 4 New Model Degree College and Component 5, i.e.
'Gender Inclusion and Equity Initiative,'.
C. Third Stage: All submitted proposals would be first evaluated by the Ministry of
Higher Education with the help of Technical Support Group; thereafter they would be
examined, appraised, and approved by the Project Approval Board (PAB) on the basis
of the points mentioned in the above selection criteria and on the basis of the past
performance of the States
Page 11
CHAPTER-V : COMPONENTS UNDER PM-USHA
1. The components of the scheme have been structured to improve the higher
education scenario in States/UTs by targeting the:
i. Existing Higher Educational Institutions, in keeping with the philosophy of NEP

2020, to consolidate and transform existing institutions,
ii. Districts as a unit of planning and strategizing for improving access and equity,
and
iii. Areas with no HEIs, to improve educational parameters in unserviced areas.
Total
Unit Cost
S. No. Component No. of Units Amt (Rs
(Rs Cr)
Cr)
Multi-Disciplinary Education and
1 35 Universities 100 3500
Research Universities (MERU)
Grants to Strengthen Universities
2 (Accredited & Unaccredited 73 Universities 20 1460
Universities)
Grants to Strengthen Colleges
3 (Accredited & Unaccredited 401 colleges 5 2005
Colleges)
40 New Model
4 New Model Degree Colleges 15 600
Degree Colleges
Gender Inclusion and Equity
5 50 Districts 10 500
Initiatives
1% for States
and 1% for
6 MMER Grants 161.3
Central
MMER
2. Every component in PM-USHA has a fixed amount as its upper limit. The
States/UTs must develop their needs/ proposals within the specified upper limit of
every component. This upper limit is based on well-defined norms and parameters
and is linked to academic, administrative, and governance reforms, whereas future
grants are outcome-based and performance-based. The PM-USHA aims to create
a self-sustaining momentum for greater accountability of State institutions and to
impress upon them the importance of improving educational quality.
Page 12
CHAPTER-VI : ACTIVITIES UNDER COMPONENTS OF PM-
USHA
1. The States/UTs/Institutions/Districts shall be given the freedom to utilise the

grants approved on the list of activities given, based on their necessity and
justifications to be provided. There shall be no fixed capping for the hard and
soft components.
2. The States/UTs/Institutions/Districts shall submit a proposal and project plan
regarding the same. Each unit would create a detailed proposal under each
component with a break-up of cost against each activity proposed. Each
proposal should also include their Output Outcome Framework.
3. The unit shall submit their proposal to the States/UTs. The States/UTs will
submit a consolidated proposal to the Ministry based on the shortlisting criteria
and their own felt priorities. The State may or may not accept the proposals
submitted by the institutions/units. Final approval of the proposal submitted by
the States/UTs would be done by the Project Approval Board.
4. List of Activities supported under various components
Components
Gra
nts
Multidisc
to
iplinary New Gender
Grants t Str
Component Name- Educatio Mode Inclusi
S. No. o stren en
 n and Re l Deg on and
gthen U gth
search U ree C Equity
niversiti en
niversitie olleg Initiativ
es the
s (MERU es e
Col
)
leg
es
Rs. 5
Rs. 100 cro Rs. 20 cro Rs. 15 Rs. 10
Unit Cost - crore
res res crores crores
s
Colle New Co
Unit Type - University University District
ge llege
Number of Units 35 73 401 40 50
(Sug
(Suggesti gesti (Manda (Sugge
(Mandatory
List of Activities ve activiti ve ac tory acti stive ac
activities)
es) tivitie vities) tivities)
s)
Implementation of NCr
F and CBCS and impl
1 Y Y
ementation of elective
course system
Page 13
Components
Gra
nts
Multidisc
to
iplinary New Gender
Grants t Str
S. No. o stren en
gthen U gth
niversiti en
es the
s (MERU es e
Col
)
leg
es
Adoption of Academic
2 Y Y Y
Bank of Credits
Adoption of Multiple En
3 Y Y Y
try and Exit
Adoption of Guidelines
4 Y Y Y
on NHEQF
Clustering and resourc

5 e sharing between ME Y
RUs
Clustering and resourc
e sharing between con
6 Y
stituent colleges within
each MERU
Using ODL and Online
7 Programmes such as Y Y Y
SWAYM,/MOOCS
Digital nodal centres fo
r digitising academic c
ontent and resources d
8 Y Y Y
elivering digital educati
on such as SWAYAM
and other MOOCs.
Internship/Apprentices
9 hip Embedded Degree Y Y Y
Programme
10 Alumni Connect portal Y Y Y
MoUs signed with Indu

stry for internship/ res
11 Y Y
earch/ entrepreneurshi
p/ employment
Page 14
Components
Gra
nts
Multidisc
to
iplinary New Gender
Grants t Str
S. No. o stren en
gthen U gth
niversiti en
es the
s (MERU es e
Col
)
leg
es
Research and Develop
12 Y Y
ment Cell
Academic and researc
h Collaboration betwee
13 Y Y
n Indian and foreign H
EIs
Office of International
Affairs as one-stop-offi
14 ce for all activities relat Y Y
ed to international mob
ility (students/faculty
15 Participation in NIRF Y
Adoption of Guidelines
of UGC on Institutional
16 Y Y Y
Development Plan (ID
P)
Courses in Indian Lang
17 Y Y
uages
Embedding Indian kno

18 wledge System (IKS) i Y Y
n the Curriculum
Introduction and acces
s to Online ERP portal
(Samarth Portal) for fa
culties containing all ac
ademic working proces
19 ses (Online information Y Y Y
dashboard, timetable,
examination allotment
schedule, evaluation, a
nd other academic acti
vities)
Page 15
Components
Gra
nts
Multidisc
to
iplinary New Gender
Grants t Str
S. No. o stren en
gthen U gth
niversiti en
es the
s (MERU es e
Col
)
leg
es
Evaluation Reforms by
strengthening the ‘Inter
20 Y Y Y
nal Quality Assurance
Cell’ (IQAC) of NAAC
Smart Classroom, Co
21 mputer Lab, Wi-Fi Facil Y Y Y Y
ities
Online training of teach

22 Y Y Y
ers,
Courses & e-courses,
Curriculum, and pedag
23 Y Y
ogical reforms, and Mo
Us
Setting up start-up incu
bation centers and tec
hnology development c
enters for skill-based c
24 ourses with the help of Y Y Y Y
Industries/Micro, Small
& Medium Enterprises
(MSME) at States/UTs
level
Certification Courses e
25 Y Y
mbedded in teaching
Well-equipped researc
h laboratories, Digital li
26 Y Y Y Y
braries with subscriptio
ns to reputed journals,
Bridge courses for SE
27 Y Y
DG students
Online portal for stude

28 nt services (attendance Y Y Y
, academic record, hos
Page 16
Components
Gra
nts
Multidisc
to
iplinary New Gender
Grants t Str
S. No. o stren en
gthen U gth
niversiti en
es the
s (MERU es e
Col
)
leg
es
tel-related services, co
mplaint registration, etc
.)
Placement/ Training an
d Certification program
mes, Structural Reform
29 s according to the incre Y Y
ased industry-ready co
urses, and industry-ac
ademia linkages
Construction/Renovati
30 on of Infrastructure of I Y Y Y Y
nstitute
Purchase of necessary
31 Equipments for the inst Y Y Y Y
itute
Hostels and adequate t
oilet facilities for stude
nts specially for women
32 Y Y Y Y Y
/ transgenders, speciall
y abled-friendly campu
s and special facilities
33 Opening of STEM cour Y Y Y

ses
Encouragement of incr
34 easing girls participatio Y Y
n in STEM courses
Vocational courses for
21stcentury skills, Inter
nships/Training, Innova
35 Y Y Y
tion of new courses reg
arding Vocational educ
ation
Page 17
Components
Gra
nts
Multidisc
to
iplinary New Gender
Grants t Str
S. No. o stren en
gthen U gth
niversiti en
es the
s (MERU es e
Col
)
leg
es
Training of girls in self
36 defense / physical edu Y Y
cation classes
Awareness and sensiti

37 Y Y
sation programmes
Legal support cell/ Anti
Harassment Cell/ Awar
38 eness Generation Prog Y Y
ram Cell/ Women Cell/
Anti Ragging Cell etc
Focus on skilling and v
ocationalisation Trainin
39 g /Workshops/ Placem Y Y
ent, for Females, Trans
genders,
facilitation of women’s
access to vocational, t
echnical, professional
education and emerge
nt technologies, Curric
40 ulum, and pedagogical Y Y
reforms, Opening of S
TEM courses and enco
uragement of increasin
g girls participation in s
uch courses
Providing special conv
eyance facilities for fe
41 Y Y
males and transgender
s
Improve social skills, O
42 nline classes with Ment Y Y
orship programs
Page 18
Components
Gra
nts
Multidisc
to
iplinary New Gender
Grants t Str
S. No. o stren en
gthen U gth
niversiti en
es the
s (MERU es e
Col
)
leg
es
Provide guidance and
counseling with respec
t to academic, financial
43 Y Y
, social, and other matt
ers and to enhance the
diversity
Coaching in communic
ation skills and person
ality development, and
identifying best course
44 s/training with new disc Y Y
iplines/courses/ Couns
eling on Psychological
support/ Counseling for
Career guidance
5. NEGATIVE LIST OF ACTIVITIES THAT WILL NOT BE SUPPORTED

UNDER PM-USHA (this is not exhaustive):
Payment of salaries, pensions, and other benefits, recurring/non-recurring cost

for any project under PM-USHA beyond the phase of the scheme, Celebrations
like College fests, annual days, graduations, etc, Scholarships, fellowships, or
stipends to students, Expenses incurred for travel by faculty for academic
research & other events not covered under PM-USHA, Advertisements of
institutions, and promotional events not related to PM-USHA.
Page 19
CHAPTER-VII:OUTPUT-OUTCOMES UNDER COMPONENTS
OF PM-USHA
1. Each Unit would provide its Output-Outcome framework to its corresponding

State/UT every quarter. The State/UT would submit to the Ministry the quarterly
consolidated Output-Outcome Framework for units supported under PM-USHA.
The base figures and Quarterly/Yearly targets against each indicator would be
mentioned in the proposal submitted by the Units
Output Outcome Framework
2. Component I - Multidisciplinary Education and Research Universities

(MERU)
Duly filled in data in respect of each component to be consolidated and

submitted by State
Targets to be set while submitting proposal and achievements to be submitted

Quarterly
Target
Base Achievement
Year Target/Achievement Figures for
Indicators
Figures Figures for next next Quarter
(Mention Quarter (Mention (Mention
year) Quarter) Quarter)*
Institutions Transformed
into MERUs
Number of Patents
Number of Papers
Outcomes published
Number of HEIs which
have Curriculum
Framework and Credit
System (CFCS) and
implementation of elective
Outputs course system
Number of HEIs Registered
on Academic Bank of
Credits and Offering of
multiple entry and exit in
academic programmes
Page 20
Target
Base Achievement
Indicators
Number of HEIs adopting

NHEQF
Number of courses being

conducted through
clustering between
MERUs/within constituent
colleges of each MERUs
Number of HEIs
offering academic content
theough SWAYAM and
other MOOCs.
Number of HEIs offering
internship/apprenticeship
embedded degree
programme
Number of HEIs with
Alumni connect office and
portal
Number of HEIs having
MoUs signed with Industry
for internship/ research/
entrepreneurship/
employment
Number of HEIs with
Research and
Development Cell having
Industry sponsored
Projects
Number of Indian HEIs
having Collaboration for
teaching and research with
foreign HEIs
Number of HEIs
participating in the ranking
Number of HEIs who have
published Institutional
Development Plan on their
websites
courses in regional
languages
Page 21
Target
Base Achievement
Indicators
courses related to Indian
Knowledge System
Number of HEIs using
SAMARTH ERP
*Figures for each Quarter would be cumulative (i.e. include achievement figures for
the previous quarters excluding base figures)
Page 22
3. Component II - Grants to strengthen Universities

submitted by State

Quarterly
Base
Year Targets/Achievement Targets/Achievement
Indicators Figures Figures for next Figures for next
(Mention Quarter (Mention Quarter (Mention
year) Quarter) Quarter) *
% Increase in
number of
Students enrolled
(UG/PG/PhD) in
Higher Education
Institutions (HEIs).
Number of HEIs
opting ICT-Based
Digital
Infrastructure
No. of supported
Unaccredited
Universities
Outcome accredited and
Universities
improving
accreditation
% of institutions
supported that are
organising
campus
placement for last
semester students
Number of papers
published
Number of
Output Universities being
supported.
Page 23
4. Component III - Grants to strengthen Colleges
Duly filled in data in respect of each component to be consolidated and submitted

by State
Targets to be set while submitting proposal and achievements to be submitted Quarterly

Base
Year Target/Achievement Target/Achievement
% Increase in number of
Students enrolled
(UG/PG/PhD) in Higher
Education Institutions
(HEIs).
Number of HEIs opting
ICT-Based Digital
Infrastructure
Outcome No. of supported
Unaccredited Colleges
accredited and colleges
improving accreditation
% of institutions
supported that are
organising campus
placement for last
semester students
Number of Colleges being

Output
supported.
Page 24
5. Component IV - New Model Degree Colleges

submitted by State

Quarterly
Base
% Increase in
enrollment of
Outcome
students of the
districts
Number of New
Model Degree
Output
College projects
supported.
Page 25
6. Component V - Gender & Equity Initiatives

submitted by State

Quarterly
Base
% Increase in
enrolment of
Females of the
district in STEM
courses
% Increase in
enrolment of
Outcome Females of the
district in HEIs
% Increase in
enrolment of SCs of
the district
% Increase in
enrolment of STs of
the district
Number of districts
Output
being supported.
Page 26
CHAPTER-VIII : SHORT-LISTING CRITERIA UNDER
1. Since the number of units that can be approved under PM-USHA is limited and the
expected number of proposals that will be submitted by States/UTs will be much
higher, a mechanism has been developed to short-list the proposals based on the
vision of each component however the final approval of the units would be done by
the Project Approval Board which may be based on other suitable indicators also
such as relaxation for Special Category States etc.
2. It may be noted that these short-listing criteria are subject to revision according to
the felt needs of the scheme.
COMPONENT 1 - MULTIDISCIPLINARY EDUCATION AND RESEARCH

UNIVERSITIES (MERU)
1.1 ONLY ACCREDITED STATE GOVERNMENT UNIVERSITIES WOULD BE

ELIGIBLE
1.2 Short Listing Criteria Indicators & Weights:
A. NAAC Grading
S. N. Indicator Weights
1 A++ and A+ Grading 100 marks
2 A Grading 75 marks
3 B++ Grading 50 marks
4 Below B++ Grading 0 marks
B. NIRF Ranking (2023) in Universities Category
1 Between 1-50 100 marks
5 Below 200 0 marks
Page 27
C. Students Enrollment of University with greater Student Enrollment
would be given preference with the following weightage:
1 More than 5,000 100 marks
2 4001-5000 80 marks
3 3,000-4,000 60 marks
4 Below 3000 0 marks
Note: (This data is only for campus enrolment of the University and not of the
affiliated colleges.)
D. Number of Departments in University : University with a greater number

of Departments would be given preference with the following weightage:
S. No. Indicator Weights

1 25 or more than 25 40 marks
2 20-24 30 marks
3 15-19 20 marks
4 Below 15 0 marks
E. Department-wise Faculty Positions filled in regular mode :

University with large faculty positions filled in regular mode would be
given preference with the following weightage:
(Each Department data would be filled separately)
Department Name
1 Above 75% of sanctioned faculty positions of 50 marks
the department
2 70-74.9% of sanctioned faculty positions of 40 marks
the department
the department
the department
5 Below 50% of sanctioned faculty positions of 0 marks
the department
Page 28
F. Department wise Teacher-Pupil Ratio: University with the minimum gap
of Teacher-Pupil Ratio would be given preference with the following
weightage: (Each Department data would be filled separately)
Department Name
1 Between 1:1 – 1:19 of the department 50 marks
4 Below 1:39 of the department 0 marks
G. Prior support under any Phases of RUSA
(i) Approval/amount approved means Total Approval (including Central and State
share) of the all the number of times the unit has been approved under all the phases
of RUSA under all the components.
(ii) Completion certificate means Completion Certificates for all number of times the
unit has been approved under all the phases of RUSA under each components i.e
submission of Completion certificate for less than the number of approvals will not be
considered
1 University has not been previously approved under any 100 marks
component of RUSA
2 University has been previously approved only once with 80 marks
approval of Rs. 49 crores or less but has already utilised
the full amount approved and has submitted completion
certificate
3 University has been previously approved more than once 50 marks
with approval of Rs. 49 crores or less but has already
utilised the full amount approved and has submitted
completion certificate
4 University has been previously approved with approval of 20 marks
Rs. 50 crores or more but has already utilised the full
amount approved and has submitted completion certificate
5 University has been previously approved but has not utilised 0 marks
the full amount approved and has not submitted completion
certificate
Page 29
H. Available Facilities/Activities with the Universities:
Weights
S. No. Indicators
5 marks
1. Implementation of Curriculum Framework and Credit Syste
m (CFCS) and implementation of elective course system
2. 5 marks
Adoption of Academic Bank of Credits
3. 5 marks
Adoption of Multiple Entry and Exit
4. 5 marks
Adoption of Guidelines on NHEQF and CBCS
5. Using ODL and Online Programmes such as SWAYM,/MO 5 marks

OCS
Digital nodal centres for digitising academic content and res 5 marks
6.
ources delivering digital education such as SWAYAM and o
ther MOOCs.
5 marks
7.
Internship/Apprenticeship Embedded Degree Programme
8. 5 marks
Alumni Connect portal
9. MoUs signed with Industry for internship/ research/ entrepr 5 marks
eneurship/ employment
10. 5 marks
Research and Development Cell
11. Academic and research Collaboration between Indian and f 5 marks
oreign HEIs
12. Adoption of Guidelines of UGC on Institutional Developmen 5 marks
t Plan (IDP)
Introduction and access to Online ERP portal (Samarth Port 5 marks
13. al) for faculties containing all academic working processes (
Online information dashboard, timetable, examination allot
ment schedule, evaluation, and other academic activities)
14. 5 marks
Regular training of teachers,
Setting up start-up incubation centers and technology devel 5 marks
15. opment centers for skill-based courses with the help of Indu
stries/Micro, Small & Medium Enterprises (MSME) at States
/UTs level
Placement/ Training and Certification programmes, Structu 5 marks
16.
ral Reforms according to the increased industry-ready cours
es, and industry-academia linkages
Page 30
Weights
S. No. Indicators
Vocational courses for 21stcentury skills, Internships/Traini 5 marks

17.
ng, Innovation of new courses regarding Vocational educati
on
18. 5 marks
Awareness and sensitisation programmes
19. 5 marks
Legal support cell
20. 5 marks
Anti Harassment Cell
21. 5 marks
Anti Ragging Cell
22. 5 marks
Women Support Cell
23. Internal Revenue Generation by Harnessing Private funding 5 marks
such as CSR funds, etc
Page 31
COMPONENT 2 - GRANTS TO STRENGTHEN UNIVERSITIES
2.1 ONLY STATE GOVERNMENT UNIVERSITIES WOULD BE ELIGIBLE
A. Priority would be given to units in the Focus Districts
1 Situated in Focus Districts 100 marks
2 Not situated in Focus Districts 10 marks
B. Prior support under any Phases of RUSA
unit has been approved under all the phases of RUSA under each component i.e
submission of Completion certificate for less than the number of approvals will not be
considered
1 University has not been previously approved under any 100 marks
component of RUSA
2 Approval only once under RUSA but not released any central 80 marks
share by Ministry, so far
3 Approval either once or more under RUSA but has already 40 marks
utilised the full amount approved and has submitted completion
certificate
4 Approval only once under RUSA but full amount approved not 10 marks
yet utilised and completion certificate not yet submitted
5 Approval more than once under RUSA but full amount 5 marks
approved not yet utilised and completion certificate not yet
submitted
Page 32
C. Students Enrollment : University with Higher Student Enrollment would
be given preference with the following weightage:
2 4001-5000 80 marks
3 3,001-4,000 60 marks
4 2001-3000 40 marks
5 1,000-2,000 20 marks
6 Below 1,000 0 marks
D. Number of Departments in University : University with more number of

Departments would be given preference with the following weightage:

1 25 or more than 25 40 marks
2 20-24 30 marks
3 15-19 20 marks
4 9-14 10 marks
5 5-9 5 marks
E. Department wise Faculty Positions filled in regular mode : University with

large faculty positions filled in regular mode would be given preference with the
following weightage:

1 Above 75% of sanctioned faculty positions of 30 marks
the department
the department
the department
the department
5 Below 50% of sanctioned faculty positions of 5 marks
the department
Page 33
F. Department wise Student-Teacher Ratio: University with the minimum
gap of Student-Teacher Ratio would be given preference with the following
weightage:

4 Between 1:40 – 1:60 of the department 15marks
5 Below 1:60 of the department 5 marks
Page 34
COMPONENT 3 - GRANTS TO STRENGTHEN THE COLLEGES
3.1 ONLY STATE GOVERNMENT AND GOVERNMENT-AIDED COLLEGES WILL

BE ELIGIBLE

unit has been approved under all the phases of RUSA under each component i.e.
Submission of Completion certificate for less than the number of approvals will not be
considered
1 College has not been previously approved under any 100 marks
component of RUSA
2 Approval only once under RUSA but not released any central 80 marks
share by Ministry, so far
3 Approval either once or more under RUSA but has already 40 marks
utilised the full amount approved and has submitted completion
certificate
4 Approval only once under RUSA but full amount approved not 10 marks
yet utilised and completion certificate not yet submitted
5 Approval more than once under RUSA but full amount 5 marks
approved not yet utilised and completion certificate not yet
submitted
C. Students Enrollment: College with more Student Enrollment would be

given preference with the following weightage:
2 2000-2499 50 marks
3 1500-1999 40 marks
Page 35
4 1,000-1499 30 marks
5 Below 1,000 20 marks
D. Number of Departments in College : College with more number of

Departments would be given preference with the following weightage:

1 15 or More than 15 40 marks
2 11-14 30 marks
3 5-10 20 marks
E. Department wise Faculty Positions filled in regular mode: College with

large faculty positions filled in regular mode would be given preference with the

1 Above 85% of sanctioned faculty positions 30 marks
2 80-84.9% of sanctioned faculty positions 25 marks
6 Below 50% of sanctioned faculty positions 5 marks
F. Department wise Student-Teacher Ratio : College with the minimum gap

of Student-Teacher Ratio would be given preference with the following
weightage:

1 Between 1:1 – 1:19 30 marks
4 Between 1:40 – 1:60 15marks
5 Below 1:60 5 marks
Page 36
G. Collaboration with local industries for Research/ Internship/ Placements/
Apprenticeship with the following weightage:

1 With existing Linkages 25 marks
2 With scope for linkage 15 marks
2 Without Linkages 0 marks
Page 37
COMPONENT 4 - NEW MODEL DEGREE COLLEGES:
4.1 DISTRICTS WITHOUT ANY GOVERNMENT HEIS WOULD BE ELIGIBLE. ONLY

STATE GOVERNMENT COLLEGES WOULD BE ESTABLISHED.

1 District Not Previously approved in any Phase of RUSA under 100
component of creation of Model Degree College or creation of New marks
Professional college
2 District Previously approved in any Phase of RUSA under 50
component of creation of Model Degree College or creation of New marks
Professional college but not released any central share by Ministry
3 Previously approved in any Phase of RUSA under component of 0 marks
creation of Model Degree College or creation of New Professional
college and released central share by Ministry (even part installment
would be considered)
C. The proposals with the availability of clear land title would only be
considered with the following weightages:
S. Indicator Weights
No.
1 Acquisition of Land with State’s Department of Higher 50 marks
Education with clear title (Preferably 3-5 acres in urban
areas/7-10 acres in rural areas)
2 Clear land title not obtained 0 marks
Page 38
D. Target Intake capacity of the proposed MDC or Enrolled/ Passed Out
Intermediate Students of the proposed MDC’s Districts in the first year of
functioning of college would be given preference with the following weightage:

1 1000 or more than 1000 Students 25 marks
2 999-800 Students 20 marks
5 Less than 500 Students 5 marks
E. Availability of Civic Facilities in the proposed MDC would be given

preference with the following weightage:

1 Water Facility 5 marks
2 Electricity Facility 5 marks
3 Internet connectivity through LAN 5 marks
4 Within 100m distance from pucca road 5 marks
5 Near Habitation 5 marks
6 No facility in any category 0 marks
F. Pre-Collaboration with local industries for Research/ Internship/ Placements/

Apprenticeship with the following weightage (25 marks):

G. Pre-Collaboration for Public Private Partnership (PPP) funding with the

following weightage (25 marks):

Page 39
COMPONENT 5 - GENDER INCLUSION AND EQUITY INITIATIVE
5.1 DISTRICTS WOULD BE TAKEN AS A UNIT AND NOT INDIVIDUAL

INSTITUTIONS
5.2 The proposal would include the district as a whole. The activities that can be
undertaken under this component include doing sensitisation workshops, combined
hostels for females for the nearby colleges and universities in the district, etc.
5.3 Short Listing Criteria- Indicators & Weights:

The selection criteria defined on the basis of specific indicators and weightage, such
as land availability under Infrastructure development, and Districts with GER in age
(18-23) for SC/ST/Female/transgender, would increase the chances of States/UTs
participating under PM-USHA for improving access and quality of Higher Education in
HEIs in respect of these thrust areas. The following are the criteria for selection:
A. Priority would be given to the Focus Districts
B. If the proposal contains any infrastructural activity, the proposals with

better land availability under Infrastructure would be preferred with the

1 If clear land title has been obtained or the 20 marks
proposal has no infrastructural activity
2 If clear land title has not been obtained 0 Marks
C. Female GER in age 18-23 :

1 30% or More than 30% 40 marks
2 29.9%-25% 30 marks
3 24.9%-20% 20 marks
4 19.9%-15% 10 marks
5 14.9%-10% 5 marks
6 Below 9.9% 0 marks
Page 40
D. SC GER in age 18-23:
2 24.9%-20% 30 marks
3 19.9%-15% 20 marks
4 14.9%-10% 10 marks
E. ST GER in age 18-23 :

2 19.9%-15% 30 marks
3 14.9%-10% 20 marks
4 9.9%-5% 10 marks
F. Transgender GER in age 18-23

2 19.9%-15% 30 marks
3 14.9%-10% 20 marks
4 9.9%-5% 10 marks
Page 41
CHAPTER-IX : COMPONENT 5 - MANAGEMENT
MONITORING EVALUATION AND RESEARCH (MMER)
A. The amount of MMER grants is 2 percent of the total fund approved, out of which
1 % will be released to the States/ UTs and 1 % will be utilized by the Centre. The
fund will be utilized for activities related to the implementation and monitoring of
the scheme by the States/ UTs and Centre such as operation of TSG, monitoring
portal etc. All States/UTs will be eligible for these grants.
B. The amount will not be used for the construction of any buildings, purchase of
vehicles, payment of salaries/pension of Government employees.
Page 42
CHAPTER-X : MONITORING AND EVALUATION
A. The scheme shall be monitored and evaluated at each level i.e. Central, State, and
Regional. The entire process flow beginning from the submission of proposals to
the completion of the projects shall be rigorously monitored. The apex body, NMA
shall act as an overseer of the scheme and implementation shall be ensured
through PAB for regular monitoring and evaluation of not only the proposals but
also the performance of the scheme. The Technical Support group shall also be
involved in the regular evaluation of the projects. At the State level, the scheme
shall be monitored by the SHEC and State Technical Support Group. Central
universities and regional offices of the UGC may also be utilized for monitoring the
progress of the scheme in their respective States/UTs.
B. A technology-based rigorous monitoring mechanism will be developed. The
process flow will include the submission of proposals by the States/UTs, initial
evaluation by the TSG, appraisal based on some indicative parameters, and
approval by the PAB. The implementation will further involve fund allocation and
disbursement to the States/UTs, tracking fund flow, monitoring the progress of the
projects based on achievements of physical and financial targets, submission and
assessment of Utilization Certificates, and completion of projects.
C. Every component shall be monitored with a well-defined Output-Outcome
framework. While flexibility is encouraged under each component, the end results
are always streamlined and measured in terms of increase in the equity, access,
employability, excellence parameters. A set of milestones shall be defined to ensure
effective implementation and evaluation of the progress and the final outcomes. The
implementation of the scheme shall involve quarterly/ mid-term/annual reviews in
the light of MoUs signed with the States/UTs.
D. The monitoring & evaluation system shall consolidate different applications and
systems such as PFMS, SNA Module, MIS, etc. on a single integrated platform to
ensure smooth and effective implementation of the scheme on a real-time basis.
Thus, monitoring of PM-USHA shall be paperless.
E. PM-USHA-specific training sessions on handling PFMS Platforms, and other
pertinent MIS/IT platforms can be organized to equip the staff with better technical
capabilities for ensuring efficient monitoring and evaluation of the scheme.
F. The amount allocated for the MMER component is 2 percent of the total fund
approved, out of which 1 % will be released to the States/ UTs and 1 % will be
utilized by the Centre. The fund will be utilized for activities related to the
implementation and monitoring of the scheme by the States/ UTs and Centre.
Page 43
CHAPTER-XI : MENTORING
A. The Ministry of Education runs various schemes like PMMMNMTT, ARPIT, etc.,
through which faculty and institutions are enrolled in programs for improving
teaching-learning processes, ranking, accreditation, etc. In order to ensure overall
quality improvement in the higher education institutions, recognized centrally
funded institutions and other premier institutes should be involved in mentoring
and handholding the HEIs and facilitating the training programmes for faculties of
the HEIs. Additionally, the beneficiary universities under PM-USHA that have high
NAAC grading shall also extend their support and mentor unaccredited institutions
in improving their education and research quality. Faculties in the mentee
institutions shall be encouraged to do research and made aware of the processes
involved in publishing their work in reputed journals. Training shall be given to the
faculty and students of HEIs in the rural areas to make them proficient with the
use of these resources. State/ UT will accordingly designate mentor institutions
for mentoring each University/College being supported under PM-USHA. The
NAAC would also be involved in mentoring of the non-accredited institutions
funded under PM-USHA.
B. Possibilities for funding convergence with other schemes such as ATAL Innovation
Mission, PMMMNMTT etc. of the Central Government would be explored.
C. Through concerted mentoring programmes, PM-USHA shall be able to provide

support to the institutions located in the most unserved & underserved areas;
remote/rural areas; difficult geographies; Left Wing Extremism (LWE) areas; North
Eastern Region (NER); aspirational districts, tier-2 cities, areas with low GER, etc.
to improve the quality of higher education.
Page 44
CHAPTER-XII : FUNDING SUPPORT
A. PM-USHA is funded through the Ministry of Education (MoE) with prescribed

contributions from the State governments and Union Territories (UTs). The project
cost in the public-funded institutions for all sub-components is shared between the
Central Government and State Governments in the ratio of 90:10 for North-
Easter,n States, J&K, Himachal Pradesh, and Uttarakhand and 60:40 for the Other
States and UTs with Legislature, the UTs without Legislature would be 100%
centrally funded under this scheme.
B. Measures would be taken to ensure that committed liabilities are not accumulated
beyond the XVth Finance Commission cycle. All approvals would be done
preferably in the first year of the scheme. Release of 1st installment would also be
preferably done in a timely manner subject to the fulfillment of financial rules,
scheme norms, PAB conditions, etc., to ensure that the projects are initiated on
time. Projects which are not initiated within 6 months from PAB approval would be
considered for cancellation. Rigorous monitoring would be done to ensure the
timely completion of projects.
C. All releases of Central share would be dependent upon fulfillment of relevant
conditions and submission of requisite documents.
D. Release of Central Share would be linked to the timely contribution of State Share
and all other financial norms. Instructions issued by M/o finance regarding
procedures for fund release and utilization of funds under Centrally Sponsored
Schemes would be followed.
E. Incentivising institutions that perform better in carrying out the initiatives and
tracking the outputs/outcomes of scheme interventions on SEDGs, shall be done
by giving them priority in funding. Duplication of funds shall be avoided by making
sure institutions do not receive funds from PM-USHA if they receive the funds for
that particular initiative under other schemes.
F. Release of funds would also be linked to the achievement of the expected
outcome and outputs as detailed for each component.
G. Further, with a view to ensuring greater resource flow to the State Higher
Education sector, PM-USHA will encourage States/UTs and Institutions to
undertake projects in a public-private partnership model based on viability gap
funding. The States/UTs would be encouraged to create facilitating mechanisms
such as raising funds through CSR to ease restrictions for enhancing private
investment in the sector.
Page 45
CHAPTER XIII: MoU WITH STATE GOVERNMENTS
State Governments will have to enter into an MoU with the Department of Higher
Education (MoE), in order to be eligible under PM-USHA.
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING
PRADHAN MANTRI - UCHCHATAR SHIKSHA ABHIYAN (PM-USHA)
The Memorandum of Understanding (herein after referred to as “MoU”) is made and
executed at New Delhi on this ……….of 2023
BETWEEN
The Department of Higher Education, Ministry of Education, Government of India,
through the Additional Secretary/Joint Secretary/Adviser in the Department having its
office at Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi which expression unless repugnant to the context
thereof shall mean and include their successors and assigns of the First Party;
AND
The Government of ……., through its Additional Chief Secretary/Principal Secretary,
Department of Higher Education, which expression unless repugnant to the context
thereof shall mean and include their successors and assigns of the Second Party
AND WHEREAS, the Pradhan Mantri – Uchchatar Shiksha Abhiyan (PM-
USHA) is a Centrally Sponsored Scheme to fund States/UTs institutions, with the
vision to attain higher levels of access, equity, and excellence in the State higher
education system with greater efficiency, transparency, accountability, and
responsiveness.
AND WHEREAS, this phase of the scheme will be implemented till 31 st March
2026.
SCOPE OF THE MoU
s
Expectations from MoE

i. Prior intimation to States/UT regarding PAB meetings, Mission Authority
meetings, workshops, conferences etc
ii. Ensuring timely submission of documents
iii. Timely release of instalments of central share to the States, on the basis of the
receipt of complete proposal at the ministry. In case of incomplete proposals,
deficiencies to be communicated by the ministry to the state in a timely manner.
iv. Creation of portal for online submission of PM-USHA Plans and inventory
management system
v. Regular monitoring of the implementation of the scheme through digital
mechanisms such as PFMS, Fund tracker, Reform Tracker, online portals,
Project Monitoring Units etc.
vi. Ensuring that the States/UTs submit the Completion Certificate
vii. Resolving existing committed liabilities
viii. Providing guidance to State/UT
ix. Ensuring monitoring of unaccredited institutions supported under the scheme
Page 46
Expectations from State/UT
i. To undertake administrative, academic, accreditation, and governance reforms

etc., detailed in the NEP 2020, at State/UT and Institutional level such as
Academic Bank of Credit, flexibility in entry and exit, Samarth, etc
ii. Preparation of the PM-USHA Plan within the guidelines and norms of the
scheme in the light of the National Education Policy 2020
iii. Creation of a State Higher Education Council (SHEC)
iv. Preparation and submission of a PM-USHA Plan after following a bottom-up
approach and analysing the critical needs of the State/UT in terms of
excellence, access & equity and quality in higher education and define proper
output
v. Uploading updated and correct information on the online/digital portal on a real-
time basis for proper monitoring of the scheme.
vi. Participation in Project Approval Board (PAB) meetings, PM-USHA Mission
Authority meetings, workshops, video conferences etc as informed by MoE
vii. Fulfilment of conditions laid down by the PAB in its approval of the components
viii. Releasing of the State share within 30 days after the Centre share is released.
Timely contribution and utilisation of corresponding State Share
ix. Timely utilisation and submission of utilisation certificate (UC) for released
central share, using the online portal
x. Timely completion of projects and submission of completion report to MoE
xi. Focusing on key areas of multidisciplinary education, research and innovation,
online and ODL modes of teaching-learning and vocationalisation &
employability
xii. Conducting a study to identify the gaps leading to high unemployability of
graduates in their respective states.
xiii. Ensuring a firm plan of action for accreditation of unaccredited institutions of
the States/UTs
xiv. Making efforts for filling up faculty vacancies and for ensuring that there is no
ban on recruitment
xv. Annual maintenance of the equipment to be borne by the States/UTs.
xvi. Ensuring that infrastructural facilities created will be barrier free and follow
Harmonised Guidelines and Space Standards for Barrier-free Built
Environment for persons with Disability and Elderly Persons
xvii. Encouraging its institution towards increasing their IRG.
xviii. Making efforts for increasing their spending on Higher Education as a
percentage of GSDP as per the recommendation of NEP 2020
Page 47
xix. As a condition, if the commencement of project does not happen within 6
months of approval by PAB, the State/UT shall surrender the funding and other
institutions within or outside the State/UT shall be preferred under the same
component for funding.
For and on behalf of Department of Higher For and on behalf of States/Union

Education, Ministry of Education Territories of …………..
( )
( ) Additional Chief Secretary/Principal
Additional/Joint Secretary/Adviser Secretary, Department of Higher
Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi-110001 Education,
Govt. of ………..
In the presence of In the presence of

Witnesses (1) Witnesses (1)
Name, Designation & Signature Name, Designation & Signature
Witnesses (2) Witnesses (2)
Name, Designation & Signature Name, Designation & Signature
******************************
Page 48

PM USHA Final Guidelines

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

PM USHA Final Guidelines

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

PM USHA Final Guidelines

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Ministry of Education

Department of Higher Education

PRADHAN MANTRI UCHCHATAR

PRADHAN MANTRI UCHCHATAR SHIKSHA ABHIYAN

CHAPTERS TOPIC PAGE

2. It covers government and government-aided institutions of the States and UTs. As

PM-USHA would be focusing on the following:

A. Equity, Access, and Inclusion:

B. Developing Quality Teaching & Learning processes:

16. Accreditation pushes institutions to meet and maintain higher standards in

17. National Assessment and Accreditation Council (NAAC), is a national accreditation

D. ICT-based Digital Infrastructure:

19. To ensure greater access to education, there is the significant importance of

1. PM-USHA shall be implemented and monitored through an institutional

A. CENTRAL LEVEL STRUCTURE

2. The central level structure comprises four bodies namely

a) National Mission Authority (NMA) which would be chaired by Hon’ble

B. STATE LEVEL STRUCTURE

3. State level structure is comprised of three bodies namely

a) State Higher Education Council (SHEC)

C. INSTITUTIONAL LEVEL STRUCTURE

4. The project at the institutional level is managed by two bodies:

a) Board of Governors (BOGs)

The objectives of the scheme are:

1. To improve the overall quality of existing state higher educational institutions by

1. The scope of the Scheme is as follows:

4. The recommendation of institutions shall be done by the State/ UT Governments/

5. One of the major scopes of PM-USHA would be helping institutions in getting/

6. Process of Selection through Challenge Method: Although the components

i. Implementation of NEP reforms

i. Existing Higher Educational Institutions, in keeping with the philosophy of NEP

1. The States/UTs/Institutions/Districts shall be given the freedom to utilise the

Clustering and resourc

10 Alumni Connect portal Y Y Y

MoUs signed with Indu

Embedding Indian kno

Online training of teach

Online portal for stude

33 Opening of STEM cour Y Y Y

Awareness and sensiti

5. NEGATIVE LIST OF ACTIVITIES THAT WILL NOT BE SUPPORTED

Payment of salaries, pensions, and other benefits, recurring/non-recurring cost

1. Each Unit would provide its Output-Outcome framework to its corresponding

Output Outcome Framework

2. Component I - Multidisciplinary Education and Research Universities

Duly filled in data in respect of each component to be consolidated and

Targets to be set while submitting proposal and achievements to be submitted

Number of HEIs adopting

Number of courses being

Duly filled in data in respect of each component to be consolidated and

Targets to be set while submitting proposal and achievements to be submitted

Duly filled in data in respect of each component to be consolidated and submitted

Targets to be set while submitting proposal and achievements to be submitted Quarterly

Number of Colleges being

Duly filled in data in respect of each component to be consolidated and

Targets to be set while submitting proposal and achievements to be submitted

Duly filled in data in respect of each component to be consolidated and

Targets to be set while submitting proposal and achievements to be submitted

COMPONENT 1 - MULTIDISCIPLINARY EDUCATION AND RESEARCH

1.1 ONLY ACCREDITED STATE GOVERNMENT UNIVERSITIES WOULD BE