Legal Method
Legal Method
Course Description
This course seeks to enable first year students to understand how to study law. It facilitate them
in identifying, examining the various tools of the legal studies. It develops analytical capacity
and introduces them with types of research issues in any area of law. It is a bridge course
designed to equip students with the basic skills and information necessary to navigate the law
related courses and activities during their law school life and later.
Course Objectives
• To be able to distinguish between the major kinds of law, legal system and institution.
• Know the structure of the legal institutions and the hierarchy of courts in India.
• To acquire the ability to identify legal issues and principles underlying any given factual
situations, and to undertake and present research on such issues. To know the various
sources of law and be able to synthesize such sources and use them to formulate
argument in their research.
• To be familiar with legal research sources and tools and basic techniques of legal and
logical reasoning and be able to write clearly and succinctly, tailoring their writing to
their audience and their purpose.
Course Outcome:
Pedagogy
School of Law and Governance
A various learning methods will be used which will emphasize a cooperative learning format.
Student led discussions and presentations will be combined with instructor facilitated
experiences and lectures. Specific methods include:
• Class Room Discussion
• Lecture Method
• Presentations
• Case Studies
• Projects
• Court Room Exercise
• Problem method
Evaluation Scheme:
• 30% - Continuous Internal Assessment (Formative in nature but also contributing to the
final grades).
• 70% - End Term External Examination (University Examination).
Course Contents:
Suggested Readings:
4. Joseph Minattur, “Introduction” in Joseph Minattur (ed.), Indian Legal System, vii – xiv (2nd
ed., 2006);
5. V.S. Deshpande, “Nature of the Indian Legal System” in Joseph Minattur, op cit.;
6. N.R.M. Menon, “Our Legal System”, Legal Aid Newsletter, November 1982.
7. R. David & J.E.C Brierley, Major Legal Systems of the World Today 17-31, 484-515 (3rd ed.
1985).
➢ Custom,
➢ Precedent,
➢ Legislation.
Suggested Readings:
2. M.P Jain., “Custom as a Source of Law in India”, 3 Jaipur Law Journal 96 (1963);
3. I. C. Saxena, “The Doctrine of Precedent in India”, 3 Jaipur Law Journal 188 (1963);
4. Rupert Cross and J.W. Harris, Precedent in English Law (4th ed., 1991);
6. G.W. Paton and David P. Derham, A Textbook of Jurisprudence, Chapter VI (4th ed., 2004);
➢ Nature and functions of Legal systems: civil law & common law;
➢ Constitution as basic law;
School of Law and Governance
➢ Rule of law;
➢ Separation of powers;
➢ Judicial system in India
Suggested Readings:
2. J. S. Verma, “50 years of Freedom under Rule of Law : Indian Experience”, 4-7 Law and
Justice 83 (2000);
3. UpendraBaxi, “The Rule of Law in India”, 4 International Journal of Human Rights 6-25
(2007) [available at www.surjournal.org]
5. H.M. Seervai, “Rule of Law” in The Position of the Indian Judiciary under the Constitution of
India 83-96 (1970);
MODULE -4: Introduction to the various schools of law (Only basic concepts)
➢ Natural schools;
➢ Analytical schools;
➢ Historical schools;
➢ Realistic School
Suggested Readings:
2. M.P Jain., “Custom as a Source of Law in India”, 3 Jaipur Law Journal 96 (1963);
3. I. C. Saxena, “The Doctrine of Precedent in India”, 3 Jaipur Law Journal 188 (1963);
4. Rupert Cross and J.W. Harris, Precedent in English Law (4th ed., 1991);
School of Law and Governance
6. G.W. Paton and David P. Derham, A Textbook of Jurisprudence, Chapter VI (4th ed., 2004);
Suggested Readings:
3. H.M. Seervai, “Rule of Law” in The Position of the Indian Judiciary under the Constitution of
India 83-96 (1970);
www.telegraphindia.com/archive/1001212/editoria.htm
9. Reports of Law Commission of India on Panchayats and Gram Nyayalaya [14th Report (1958)
and 114th Report (1986)]
http://lawcommissionofindia.nic.in
10. J. S. Bisht, “LokAdalat : A Mechanism of Alternate Dispute Resolution”, XXXI Indian Bar
Review 165 (2004);
Suggested Readings:
CASE STUDY:
8. Commissioner of wealth tax, Meerut vs. Sharvan kumar swarup & sons, 1994(6)
SCC623;Peoples Union for civil liberties vs. Union of India, 1997(1)SCC301;
9. R.K.Tangkhul vs. R.Simirei,AIR 1961Manipur 1;
10. Balusami vs. Balkrishna, AIR 1957 Mad.97;
11. Tekaha A.O. vs. Sakumeeran A.O., AIR 2004 SC 3674
12. State of Bihar vs. Sonawati, AIR 1961, SC 221, 231;
13. Ramjawaya Kapoor vs. State of Punjab, AIR 1955 SC 549,556;
14. NHRC vs. State of Arunachal Pradesh, AIR 1996, SC1234;
15. Hussainara Khatoon vs. State of Bihar, AIR 1979 SC1369;
16. Khatri vs. State of Bihar, 1981 SCC (1) 627.