0% found this document useful (0 votes)
6 views

Lecture - 7 - Deflection of Beams-Energy Approach

Uploaded by

Mustafa Adel
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
6 views

Lecture - 7 - Deflection of Beams-Energy Approach

Uploaded by

Mustafa Adel
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 14

5.2.

Castigliano’s method (Energy Approach):


This theorem states that the displacement at the point of
application of an external load, in the direction of this load, is
the partial derivative of the total strain energy U with respect to
this load.
If the external load is force P then the corresponding
displacement will linear displacement v, and for the moment M
its corresponding displacement is the rotation of the body q.
U U
vi  and qi 
Pi M i
Notice that the strain energy stored in a beam subjected to
bending moment M is given by:
2
1M
U  dx
2 EI
Example 5.4:
P
Determine the maximum transverse deflection
A B
and the maximum rotation of a cantilever of
length L subjected to load P at its free end using L
the energy approach. Also get the deflection at
x
the mid-span.
Solution: M(x)

First: Get the variation of the bending moment x


along the beam.
M(x)= -P.(L-x)
M(x)= -P.(L-x)
Second: Getting the strain energy stored in the beam:

  PL  x 2 
L
U    dx
0 
2 EI
Third: Integration over the beam legth and differentiating w.r.t. P :

 L
 PL  x  
2
vB   
P 0  2 EI
 dx

vB  
2

  P  L  x  

3
 L

P  2 EI 3 0

vB  

 2 P  L  x  

3
 L

 2 EI 3 0
3
PL
vB 
3EI
To get the rotation of the beam at point B:
P M0
First: Assume a bending moment M0 acting at B
A
this point
L

x
Second: Get the variation of the bending moment
along the beam. M(x)

M(x)= - M0 - P.(L-x) x
-M0

M(x)= -M0-P.(L-x)
Third: Getting the strain energy stored in the beam:

  M 0  PL  x 2 
L
U    dx
0
2 EI 
Fourth: Integration over the beam length and differentiating w.r.t. M0 :

 L
 M0  P L  x  
  2
qB   
M 0 0  2 EI
 dx

  2 M 0  PL  x 


L
qB     dx
0 
2 EI

 P L  x  
L
M 0 .x
qB    dx
0 
EI EI 

 M 0 .x  P L  x   2 L

qB    
 EI 2 EI 0

M 0 L PL2
qB  
EI 2 EI
Fifth: Let M0 =0 , then:
PL2
qB 
2 EI
To get the deflection of the mid-span:
P0 P
First: Assume a force P0 acting at this point B
A
L/2
L
Second: Get the variation of the bending moment
along the beam: x
M(x)
M(x)= -P (L-x) L/2 ≤ x ≤ L
x
M(x)= -P0 (L/2 - x) -P (L-x) 0 ≤ x ≤ L/2
Third: Getting the strain energy stored in the beam:

L/2
  P0 L / 2  x   PL  x 2 
U1  0

 2 EI
 dx

  PL  x 2 
L
U2     dx
L/2  
2 EI

Total strain energy U = U1 + U2

Fourth: Integration over the beam length and differentiating w.r.t. P0 :


vat L/2  (U1  U 2 )
P0

 

L/2
  P  L / 2  x   P  L  x 2
 L
  P  L  x 2
  
        
0
vat L/2 dx dx
P0 
0  2 EI  L/2 
2 EI   
  2L / 2  x  P0 L / 2  x   PL  x 
L/2
vat L/2     dx
0  
2 EI

 
L/2
  P0 L / 2  x   PL / 2  x L  x  dx
1
vat L/2  
2

EI 0

 P L / 2  x   PL / 2  3 / 2Lx  x dx


L/2
1

2 2 2
vat L/2 0
EI 0

  P0 L / 2  x 
L/2
 2 x 
3 3
1
vat L/2    P L x / 2  3 / 4 Lx  
2

EI  3  3  0
L/2
1  L L 2
2
( L / 2) 
3
 0  P  3 / 4 LL / 2   
2
vat L/2
EI   2 3  0
5 PL3
vat L/2 
48 EI
5.3. Statically Indeterminate Problems:
When beams have the number of the unknown reactions
exceeds the number of the equilibrium equations available for
the system, we call such a case a statically indeterminate problems.

In such a case it is necessary to supplement the equilibrium


equations with additional equations stemming from the
deformation of the beam.
Example 5.5:
Determine the external reactions at the supports P
of a beam of length L subjected to load P at its A B
mid-span and totally fixed from both ends. L

x
Solution:
From the equilibrium of forces one can get RA RB
that RA = RB = P/2 MA P MB
A B
The equilibrium of moments will lead to a
redundant equation.

To solve for MA and MB we need to use the


information about the deflection in the
beam.
P

This can be achieved through dividing the A B


problem into three part. L

P
The first part consists of a cantilever subjected 1
to a load at its mid-span (point C). A C B
L

The second part consists of a cantilever of RB


2
subjected to a load at its free end (point B). A B
L

The third part consists of a cantilever subjected MB


3
to a load at its free end (point B). A B
L
Concerning part (1): P

A C B
L

vC
qC

P L / 2 
2
PL2 L PL2 L PL3
qC   vB1  q C    
2 EI 8EI 2 8EI 2 16 EI
From example 5.4.
P L / 2 
3
PL3 PL3
vC   vB 2 
3EI 24 EI 24 EI

PL3 PL3
vBtotal  vB1  vB2  
16 EI 24 EI
5PL3
vBtotal 
48EI
Concerning part (2):
RB RB = P/2
A B
L

RB L3 PL3
From example 5.4. vB  
3EI 6 EI

Concerning part (3):


MB
A B
L

It can be seen that proven that (Problem 5.b.1) the vertical deflection at the
free end due to the application of bending moment MB takes the value:
2
MBL
vB 
2 EI
Since the beam is totally fixed at point B, the deflection at that point is zero.

Applying the principle of superposition at point B.

PL3 5PL3 M B L2
vB  0   
6 EI 48EI 2 EI

PL
Then: MB 
8

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy