Unit 16 Presumptions PDF
Unit 16 Presumptions PDF
• SHALL PRESUME
111A. Presumption as to certain offences.
• –– (1) Where a person is accused of having committed any offence
specified in sub-section (2), in ––
• (a) any area declared to be a disturbed area under any enactment, for the
time being in force, making provision for the suppression of disorder and
restoration and maintenance of public order; or
• (b) any area in which there has been, over a period of more than one
month, extensive disturbance of the public peace,
• and it is shown that such person had been at a place in such area at a time
when firearms or explosives were used at or from that place to attack or
resist the members of any armed forces or the forces charged with the
maintenance of public order acting in the discharge of their duties, it shall
be presumed, unless the contrary is shown, that such person had
committed such offence.
• (2) The offences referred to in sub-section (1) are the following,
namely: ––
(a) an offence under section 121, section 121A, section 122 or section
123 of the Indian Penal
• Code (45 of 1860);
• (b) criminal conspiracy or attempt to commit, or abetment of, an
offence under section 122 or section 123 of the Indian Penal Code (45
of 1860).]
112. Birth during marriage, conclusive proof
of legitimacy. ––
•The fact that any person was born during the continuance of
a valid marriage between his mother and any man, or within
two hundred and eighty days after its dissolution, the
mother remaining unmarried, shall be conclusive proof that
he is the legitimate son of that man, unless it can be shown
that the parties to the marriage had no access to each other
at any time when he could have been begotten.
113. Proof of cession of territory. ––
(a) that a man who is in possession of stolen goods soon, after the theft is either
the thief or has received the goods knowing them to be stolen, unless he can
account for his possession;
(e) that judicial and official acts have been regularly performed;
• (f) that the common course of business has been followed in particular
cases;
(g) that evidence which could be and is not produced would, if produced,
be unfavourable to the
• person who withholds it;
(h) that if a man refuses to answer a question which he is not compelled to
answer by law, the answer,
• if given, would be unfavourable to him;
(i) that when a document creating an obligation is in the hands of the
obligor, the obligation has been
• discharged.
[114A. Presumption as to absence of
consent in certain prosecution for rape. ––
• In a prosecution for rape under clause (a), clause (b), clause (c),
clause (d), clause (e), clause (f), clause (g), clause (h), clause (i), clause
(j), clause (k), clause (l), clause (m) or clause (n) of sub-section (2) of
section 376 of the Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860), where sexual
intercourse by the accused is proved and the question is whether it
was without the consent of the woman alleged to have been raped
and such woman states in her evidence before the court that she did
not consent, the court shall presume that she did not consent.
• Explanation.––In this section, “sexual intercourse” shall mean any of
the acts mentioned in clauses (a) to (d) of section 375 of the Indian
Penal Code (45 of 1860).]