1

Social Groups

Introduction

The concept of group is fundamental in sociology, emphasizing its role in socialization,

personality formation, and social organization. Sociologists like W.G. Summer, C.H. Cooley,

T.M. Newcomb, and R.K. Merton have significantly contributed to this understanding. Humans

inherently live in groups, beginning with family and continuing throughout life to meet various

needs and achieve common goals. Group interactions and long-term relationships form the basis

of societal structure. As H.M. Johnson noted, sociology primarily studies social groups,

highlighting their importance in providing companionship, recognition, and security.

Origin of Group

The origin of group life is intrinsically linked to the emergence of humanity. Groups have existed

since humans began to form social relationships, creating a shared sense of belonging. As social

animals, humans naturally live in groups, starting from family units. Although groups have

always been a part of human existence, the sociological study of groups became prominent in the

twentieth century. Groups arise from mutual agreements among individuals, reflecting the

interconnectedness of human existence.

Meaning of Group

In sociology, a group is defined as a collection of individuals who interact within social

relationships to achieve common goals. Characterized by shared traits, organized interactions,

and mutual awareness, groups differ from mere social aggregates and categories, as they possess

both structural (rules and organization) and psychological (consciousness and reciprocity)
 2

aspects. A group becomes social when its members establish connections and common

objectives, making it a dynamic entity focused on collaboration.

Definitions of Social Groups

1. According to MacIver and Page a social group is “any collection of human beings who are

brought into human relationships with one another”, emphasizing the relational aspect that

distinguishes groups from mere aggregates.

2. According to Ogburn and Nimkoff, “whenever two or more individuals come together and

influence one another, they may be said constitute a social group”, highlighting that interaction is

a key component in forming a social group.

3. According to George Homans group means such individuals that interact according to

established patterns, indicating that groups operate within specific social norms and structures.

4. According to Horton and Hunt, “Groups are aggregates or categories of people who have a

consciousness of membership and of interaction”, stressing the importance of awareness and

interaction among members.

5. According to Turner and Killing, “a group is always formed by the individuals who interact

and this interaction is affected by the fact that they are a unit. The awareness of interaction and

being a unit depends mainly on the criteria of the group”, shaping members' awareness of their

collective identity.

6. According to A.W. Green, “A group is an aggregate of individuals which persists it time,

which has one or more interests and activities in common which is organised”, highlighting

organization as a key characteristic.

 3

7. According to E.S. Bogardus, “A social group may be thought of a number of persons two or

more, who have some common objects of attention who are stimulating to each other, who have

common loyalty and participate in similar activities”, suggesting that shared loyalties and

interactions are vital for group formation.

8. According to Williams, “A social group is a given aggregate people playing inter-related roles

and recognised by themselves or others as a unit of interaction”, recognized as a unit by

themselves or others.

9. Bennet and Tumin consider similar goals and agreeable means also as the necessary factors

along with interaction in the structure of group.

10. Albion Small opines, A group is “any number of people larger or smaller between whom

such relations are discovered that they must be thought of together”, necessitating their

consideration as a collective.

11. According to Elbridge and Merrill, “A social group may be defined as two or more persons

who are in communication over an appreciable period of time and who act in accordance with a

common function or purpose”.

12. According to Sheriff and Sheriff, “A group is a social unit which consists of a number of

individuals who stand in (more or less) definite status and role relationships to one another and

which possess a set of values or norms of its own, regulating the behaviour of individual

members at least in matters of consequence to the group” noting the importance of values and

norms that regulate behavior among members.

 4

Characteristics of Social Groups

1. Defined Number of Individuals: A social group requires at least two members, with the

number of individuals varying.

2. Reciprocal Relations: Members engage in interactions, forming the foundation of the group.

3. Common Goal: Groups are formed to achieve shared objectives, often requiring members to

prioritize group interests over individual ones.

4. Sense of Unity and Solidarity: Members are bonded by mutual relations, fostering loyalty and

a sense of togetherness.

5. We-Feeling: A strong identification with the group promotes cooperation and distinguishes

members from non-members.

6. Group Norms: Social groups establish regulations that members are expected to follow,

maintaining order and unity.

7. Similar Behavior: Members often display similar behaviors, driven by shared values and

goals.

8. Awareness: Members recognize their belonging to the group, differentiating themselves from

outsiders.

9. Group Control: Groups exercise control over members' actions, particularly over non-

conformists.

10. Nature: Social groups can be either permanent (e.g., families) or temporary (e.g., crowds).
 5

11. Dynamic Nature: Social groups are not static; they evolve in response to changes over time.

12. Established Patterns: Groups operate within established patterns of interaction and

organization.

These characteristics highlight the essential elements that define and differentiate social groups

in sociological studies.

Classification of Social Groups

Sociologists classify social groups based on various criteria such as interests, organization,

permanence, and member interactions. M. Ginsberg identifies classifications including size, local

distribution, and inclusiveness. H.T. Mazumdar outlines ten dichotomous groups, including

primary vs. secondary, in-group vs. out-group, and voluntary vs. involuntary. George Simmel

categorizes groups by size into monads (single individuals), dyads (two individuals), and triads

(three individuals). C.H. Cooley also distinguishes between primary and secondary groups based

on interaction types. Other classifications include Dwight Sanderson's involuntary, voluntary,

and delegate groups, and Tonnies' Gemeinschaft (community) vs. Gesellschaft (society).

Additionally, Emile Durkheim differentiates groups based on mechanical and organic solidarity,

while W.G. Summer classifies them as in-group and out-group based on shared identity. Overall,

sociologists provide diverse frameworks to understand the complex nature of social groups.

Primary Group

Charles Horton Cooley classified social groups into primary and secondary types in his book

Social Organization(1909), focusing on the nature and closeness of social relations. Primary

groups are small, characterized by intimate, face-to-face interactions and cooperation. Members
 6

engage in mutual support and share common problems, fostering direct and informal

relationships. Cooley emphasized that these groups are fundamental to an individual's social

nature, often described through a sense of "we-feeling" that promotes sympathy and mutual

identification. Primary groups, such as families and playgroups, play a crucial role in

socialization and personality development, influencing individuals throughout their lives.

Definitions of Primary Groups

Different sociologists have defined Primary Groups in various ways, focusing on their intimate

and personal nature:

1. Charles Horton Cooley (1909): He introduced the concept of primary groups, describing them

as small, close-knit, and intimate groups where personal relationships are deep, such as families

and close friends. Cooley emphasized that these groups are essential in shaping an individual's

social nature and ideals.

2. Robert Bierstedt: He defined primary groups as those characterized by intimate face-to-face

association and cooperation, where members are bound by close, personal, and enduring

relationships.

3. MacIver and Page: They view primary groups as those which are small and whose members

have direct personal relations with one another. They emphasize the long-lasting and emotional

aspects of these relationships, where members know each other personally.

4. Kingsley Davis: Davis highlights that primary groups are the cradle of human social behavior,

essential for the emotional and psychological well-being of individuals. He explains that primary

groups are often family units, and they play a crucial role in socializing individuals.
 7

5. George Homans: He emphasized that primary groups are small social groups whose members

share close, personal, enduring relationships, and typically, they are marked by strong emotional

ties.

All these definitions emphasize the intimacy, emotional depth, and personal nature of

relationships within primary groups. They play a foundational role in shaping social behavior,

personal development, and emotional security.

Characteristics of Primary Group

To understand primary groups, it’s essential to analyze their characteristics, which can be

categorized into external and internal traits.

External Characteristics

1. Small Size: Primary groups consist of a limited number of individuals, fostering personal

relationships and intimacy. Smaller groups enhance understanding among members.

2. Physical Proximity: Closeness among members is crucial for developing personal

relationships. While physical closeness facilitates interaction, intimacy can also grow through

communication despite geographical distances.

3. Stability or Durability of Relationships: Relationships within primary groups are stable and

continuous, allowing for lasting, intimate connections among members.

Internal Characteristics

1. Similar Ends: Members share common goals, desires, and attitudes, fostering a sense of

community and mutual support.

 8

2. Similar Background: Members typically have similar social backgrounds and experiences,

contributing to their understanding and connection with one another.

3. Relationships as an End in Itself: Primary relationships are valued for their intrinsic worth,

focusing on love and affection rather than selfish interests.

4. Personal Relationships: Members know each other well, and relationships are characterized by

deep personal connections, making them irreplaceable.

5. Inclusive Relationships: Primary relationships encompass all aspects of members’

personalities, leading to a comprehensive understanding of each individual.

6. Spontaneity: These relationships grow naturally without compulsion, often arising in familial

contexts, such as between a mother and child.

7. Control Over Members: Primary groups exert significant control over their members due to

personal knowledge and close relationships, aiding effective social functioning.

8. Subordination of Individual Interest to Group Interest: While members join to fulfill personal

needs, the group’s collective interests take precedence, promoting cooperation.

These characteristics highlight the importance of primary groups in socialization and personal

development, shaping individuals’ identities and interactions.

Importance of Primary Group

Primary groups hold significant importance for both individuals and society across various life

stages, including childhood, youth, adulthood, and old age. They are fundamental in preparing
 9

individuals for successful social lives and play a crucial role in the socialization process. Here

are key points highlighting their importance:

1. Personality Development: Primary groups shape individuals' personalities by instilling social

norms, values, and beliefs. They are the first social contact for children, forming the basis of

their social nature.

2. Psychological Needs: These groups fulfill essential psychological needs for love, affection,

and companionship, reducing emotional stress and providing a sense of belonging.

3. Spontaneous Living: Primary groups facilitate informal and spontaneous interactions, allowing

members to connect freely and satisfy their need for genuine relationships.

4. Motivation and Support: The presence of close members acts as a stimulus for pursuing

interests, offering cooperation and inspiration, making individual goals more achievable.

5. Security: They provide emotional and physical security, particularly to vulnerable individuals

like children and the elderly, ensuring support during times of need.

6. Social Control: Primary groups exert informal control over members' behavior, guiding them

to adhere to social norms and preventing deviant behavior.

7. Democratic Spirit: These groups foster qualities such as love, cooperation, and tolerance,

promoting a democratic ethos among members.

8. Social Integration: Primary groups introduce individuals to society, helping them internalize

social norms and cultural practices essential for societal functioning.

 10

9. Efficiency: By creating a supportive environment, primary groups enhance individuals'

efficiency and productivity, teaching valuable qualities.

10. Societal Needs: They serve as the foundation of social organizations, fulfilling various

societal needs and contributing to social cohesion.

Overall, primary groups are vital for individual development and societal stability, functioning as

the nucleus of social interaction and support.

Secondary Groups

Although Charles Horton Cooley is credited with classifying groups into primary and secondary,

he never explicitly used the term "secondary group." Later scholars inferred the concept of

secondary groups from Cooley's description of primary groups. Secondary groups are the

opposite of primary groups, characterized by their large size, short duration, and impersonal

relationships. Unlike primary groups, they lack face-to-face interaction, and members are often

unknown to each other personally. The relationships are formal, goal-oriented, and based on self-

interest, often governed by formal rules and indirect communication. Sociologist Paul Landies

referred to secondary groups as the "cold world" because of their superficial, specialized, and

utility-driven nature. Classic examples include cities, nations, political parties, trade unions, and

corporations. These groups are essential in modern industrial societies, where specialization and

division of labor dominate.

Definitions of Secondary Groups

(1) According to K. Davis, “Secondary groups can be roughly defined as the opposite of

everything already said about primary groups”, meaning they lack the intimacy, close-knit
 11

relationships, and personal connections found in primary groups. They are larger, more formal,

and less personal in nature.

(2) According to Ogburn and Nimkoff, “The groups which provide experience lacking in

intimacy are called secondary groups”, meaning they don't foster the deep, personal relationships

seen in primary groups. Interactions are more detached and less emotionally involved.

(3) According to H.T. Mazumdar, “When face-to-face contacts are not present in the relations of

members, we have secondary groups”, distinguishing them from primary groups where members

engage in direct, personal interactions. Communication tends to be more formal and indirect.

(4) According to P.H. Landis, “Secondary groups are those that are relatively casual and

impersonal in their relationships. Relationships in them are usually competitive rather than

mutually helpful”, focusing on specific goals rather than emotional bonds.

(5) According to E.W. Stewart, “Secondary groups are groups created for specific purposes and

interested in their members mainly for their contributions to those purposes”, rather than for

personal or emotional connections, reflecting a utilitarian approach.

These definitions emphasize the formal, goal-oriented, and impersonal nature of secondary

groups, in contrast to the intimate and emotionally supportive dynamics of primary groups.

Characteristics of Secondary Group

1. Large Size: Secondary groups often include a large number of members, making personal,

face-to-face interactions difficult. Due to their size, members may not even know each other, like

in large organizations or social institutions.

 12

2. Definite Aims: These groups are created with clear objectives or purposes. For example,

schools aim to provide education, while political parties aim to gain political influence.

3. Voluntary Membership: People join secondary groups by choice. Membership is based on

personal interests, and individuals can join or leave freely, unlike primary groups such as

families.

4. Formal, Indirect, and Impersonal Relations: Relationships in secondary groups are formal and

functional, guided by rules rather than personal connections. These interactions are less

emotional and more transactional.

5. Active and Inactive Members: In secondary groups, some members are highly active in

achieving group goals, while others remain passive, often due to the lack of intimate personal

bonds.

6. Formal Rules: These groups are regulated by clear, formalized rules and guidelines, often

written down, which members must follow.

7. Status Based on Role: An individual's position or rank in the group depends on their assigned

role and contributions, not personal characteristics or relationships.

8. Individuality: Members focus on fulfilling their self-interest within the group. Once their

personal goals are met, they may leave or reduce their involvement.

9. Self-dependence: Due to the impersonal nature of secondary groups, members tend to rely on

themselves to meet their needs, rather than forming strong mutual bonds.

10. Dissimilar Ends: Members often have diverse personal goals or reasons for joining, which

may not always align with the group's overall purpose.

 13

11. Means to an End: Relationships in secondary groups are functional, serving a specific goal or

purpose. Social connections are less about personal interaction and more about achieving the

group's aims.

12. Formal Social Control: The behavior of members is controlled by formal means, such as

laws, rules, and organizational guidelines.

13. Division of Labor: Tasks and responsibilities are clearly divided among members based on

specialization, ensuring that the group operates efficiently.

These characteristics emphasize the functional, impersonal, and organized nature of secondary

groups, distinguishing them from the close-knit, intimate nature of primary groups.

Importance of Secondary Groups

1. Efficiency: Secondary groups enhance efficiency by clearly defining roles, responsibilities,

and goals. Their formal structure and division of labor focus on achieving specific aims,

subordinating emotions and sentiments to performance and results.

2. Wider Opportunity: These groups offer members greater opportunities for personal and

professional growth, providing a variety of career paths in areas like business, education, and

industry.

3. Wider Outlook: Secondary groups, being larger and more diverse, broaden the perspectives of

their members. Interacting with a wide range of people helps foster a more universal, open-

minded outlook.
 14

4. Functional in Character: Unlike primary groups, secondary groups are task-oriented.

Relationships within them are practical, driven by specific goals rather than emotional or

personal bonds.

Distinction between Primary and Secondary Group

1. Size: Primary groups are small and localized, like families, while secondary groups, such as

organizations or associations, are large and spread worldwide.

2. Stability: Primary groups tend to be stable and long-lasting (e.g., family). Secondary groups

can be either temporary or permanent and may dissolve after fulfilling their specific purpose.

3. Cooperation: Primary group members engage in direct, face-to-face cooperation, while in

secondary groups, cooperation is indirect, often based on formal interactions.

4. Structure: Primary groups are informal and simple, governed by unwritten rules. Secondary

groups are formal, with clear, written regulations and organized systems.

5. Relationships: Primary groups foster intimate, personal relationships. In secondary groups,

relationships are impersonal, formal, and goal-oriented.

6. Social Control: Primary groups use informal control mechanisms like customs. Secondary

groups rely on formal means, such as laws and institutions, to regulate behavior.

7. Goals: Primary group members share common goals. Secondary groups allow for diverse,

individual goals pursued by their members.

8. Personality Impact: Primary groups profoundly influence personality development. Secondary

groups affect only certain aspects of an individual’s personality.

 15

9. Physical Closeness: Members of primary groups live close to each other and interact directly,

while secondary group members are often scattered geographically.

10. Spontaneity vs. External Forces: Relationships in primary groups are spontaneous, while

secondary group relationships are driven by external rules or goals.

11. All-Inclusive vs. Specific: Primary groups involve deep, all-inclusive relationships, where

members know each other well. Secondary groups focus on specific interactions, without deep

personal connections.

In Group (We Group)

Sociologist William Graham Sumner classified groups into in-groups and out-groups based on

"we-feeling." In-groups are those with which an individual strongly identifies, feeling

attachment, sympathy, and affection toward other members. In-group members share a sense of

solidarity, cooperation, and mutual respect, often marked by a sense of ethnocentrism—believing

their group is superior. Examples include one's family, tribe, or community. In-groups promote

qualities like love, sacrifice, and brotherhood, with members willing to work for and even

sacrifice themselves for the group’s welfare.

Definitions of In Group

1. William Graham Sumner: Sumner, who introduced the concept, defines the in-group as a

group with which an individual strongly identifies, forming a "we-feeling." This group creates a

sense of belonging, loyalty, and shared identity among its members. In-groups foster cooperation

and solidarity, with members often viewing themselves as superior to those outside the group

(ethnocentrism).
 16

2. George Herbert Mead: Mead describes the in-group as essential for the development of an

individual's "self." He emphasizes that the group provides the social framework within which a

person understands themselves and others, contributing to the formation of identity through

shared experiences and communication.

3. Henri Tajfel (Social Identity Theory): Tajfel’s definition highlights that individuals categorize

themselves into in-groups to boost self-esteem and define themselves in contrast to out-groups.

This in-group identity influences attitudes and behaviors, fostering favoritism toward in-group

members.

4. Robert Merton: Merton expands on in-group definitions by explaining that members perceive

the group as a reference group, providing standards for behavior and values. The group's norms

shape the individual’s worldview and decision-making.

Overall, in-groups are characterized by shared identity, mutual loyalty, and a sense of belonging.

Members of in-groups typically display cooperation and solidarity, defining themselves in

contrast to out-groups.

Characteristics of In-Group

1. Ethnocentrism: Members of an in-group view their group as superior and central to their

worldview. This feeling of pride or patriotism leads them to favor their group over others and

measure others by their group's standards.

2. Similar Behavior: In-group members tend to exhibit similar behaviors, attitudes, and opinions,

leading to uniformity in their actions and reactions, reinforcing their shared identity.
 17

3. We-feeling: This strong sense of belonging or "oneness" creates a distinction between in-

group members and those outside the group. It emphasizes a collective identity that unites the

group.

4. Sense of Unity: A characteristic of in-groups is a strong sense of unity or cohesion among

members. This feeling of togetherness helps them see themselves as a single, united entity.

5. Love, Sympathy, and Fellow-feeling: Positive human traits like love, sympathy, and mutual

help are prominent within in-groups, strengthening relationships and fostering a sense of mutual

support and sacrifice among members.

Out-Group (They Group)

Out-groups, as defined by W.G. Sumner, are groups to which an individual does not belong and

often feels a sense of difference or opposition. These groups are characterized by a lack of

identification or connection with the individual’s in-group, and are often referred to as "they" or

"others." There is typically a sense of indifference, avoidance, or even antagonism toward

members of an out-group. For example, a person may view their own country as their in-group

while considering another nation as an out-group, leading to competition or rivalry.

Definitions of Out-Group

1. W.G. Sumner: He introduced the concept of out-groups as groups to which individuals do not

belong and often view with a sense of difference, avoidance, or hostility. An out-group is seen in

opposition to one's in-group, and individuals typically express a sense of "they" towards it.
 18

2. Tajfel’s Social Identity Theory: Out-groups are essential in establishing the in-group's identity.

In contrast to the in-group, members of the out-group are often seen as different or even inferior,

which fosters in-group cohesion and strengthens self-identity.

3. Sociological Perspective: Out-groups are viewed as social groups toward which an individual

feels disconnected or antagonistic, often leading to prejudice, competition, or conflict. This sense

of "otherness" can shape group dynamics and intergroup relations.

Each of these definitions highlights how out-groups are constructed in relation to an individual's

own affiliations, often influencing social behavior and attitudes toward those perceived as

outside one's own group.

Characteristics of Out-Group

1. Defined in Relation to In-Group: An out-group is understood in contrast to an in-group. There

is a clear distinction in behavior and attitudes between the members of in-groups and out-groups.

2. "They" or "Other" Feeling: Members of an out-group are referred to as "they" or "others."

Individuals do not belong to this group, and thus this sense of separateness develops.

3. Antagonism or Enmity: Individuals may feel antagonism or even hostility toward members of

out-groups. In some cases, the out-group may be perceived as an enemy.

4. Negative Attitude: People often express negative feelings or attitudes toward out-group

members and may not associate themselves with that group.

5. Absence of Ethnocentrism: Unlike in-groups, out-groups are not typically marked by

ethnocentrism, meaning members do not feel a sense of superiority over others in the same way.
 19

Difference Between In-Group and Out-Group

1. Identification: An individual identifies with their in-group (e.g., family or college), while out-

groups are those with which the individual does not identify (e.g., another country).

2. Terminology: Members of an in-group use "we" to refer to themselves, while "they" is used to

refer to out-group members.

3. Membership: An individual belongs to their in-group, but they are not a member of the out-

group.

4. Ethnocentrism: In-groups are often based on ethnocentrism, where members view their group

as superior, while out-groups do not have this characteristic.

5. Behavior and Attitude: In-group members display similar behavior, attitudes, and opinions,

while there is dissimilarity in attitudes towards out-group members.

6. Attitude: A positive attitude is held towards the in-group, whereas individuals often have a

negative attitude towards out-groups.

7. Group Dynamics: In-group members exhibit cooperation, goodwill, mutual help, solidarity,

and readiness for self-sacrifice. In contrast, individuals show avoidance, dislike, and antagonism

towards the out-group.

8. Belonging: The in-group is where the individual feels a sense of belonging, while all other

groups are considered out-groups.

9. Welfare: In-group members feel their personal welfare is interconnected with other group

members, unlike out-group members.

 20

Functions of Social Groups

- Socialization: Social groups are crucial for socialization, the process through which individuals

learn the norms, values, and roles of their society. Primary groups like families are particularly

important in this process.

- Support and Security: Social groups provide emotional and psychological support, as well as a

sense of belonging and security. This is especially true for primary groups, which often serve as

a source of comfort in times of stress or crisis.

- Establishing Norms and Values: Groups establish norms (expected behaviors) and values that

guide the actions of their members. These norms can be formal, as in secondary groups like

corporations, or informal, as in peer groups.

- Identity Formation: Social groups help individuals form and maintain their social identities.

Belonging to certain groups gives individuals a sense of who they are and how they fit into the

broader social world.

- Goal Achievement: Secondary groups are particularly oriented towards achieving specific

goals, whether it's a work project, educational objective, or political aim.

- Social Control: Groups exert control over members by enforcing norms and expectations.

Group members who violate these norms may face sanctions, such as exclusion or punishment,

helping maintain social order.

Importance of Social Groups in Society

- Foundation of Society: Social groups form the building blocks of society, providing structure

and organization to human relationships.

 21

- Influence on Behavior: Groups significantly influence individual behavior, both through

socialization and through the social norms they establish. People often conform to group norms

to gain acceptance or avoid conflict.

- Facilitating Social Change: Social groups can be powerful agents of social change. Groups like

social movements, unions, or activist organizations work collectively to challenge existing norms

and push for societal reform.

- Building Institutions: Many social groups evolve into larger institutions, such as governments,

educational systems, and religious organizations, which further shape societal norms and values.

Challenges within Social Groups

- Conflict and Tension: Social groups can experience conflict, whether due to differing interests,

competition for resources, or power struggles. This can lead to group fragmentation or even

social change.

- Exclusion and Inequality: Some groups may exclude individuals based on characteristics such

as race, gender, or social class, perpetuating social inequalities and marginalization.

- Conformity and Pressure: Groups can pressure individuals to conform to certain norms,

sometimes at the expense of personal beliefs or individual expression. This can stifle creativity

or encourage unethical behavior, such as in cases of peer pressure.

Different Theoretical Perspectives of Social Groups

1. Functionalist Perspective: This view, derived from the work of Emile Durkheim and Talcott

Parsons, sees social groups as essential to maintaining societal stability and cohesion. Social

groups are considered fundamental units that ensure individuals work together to fulfill the
 22

functions necessary for society to operate smoothly. Each group has a specific role, contributing

to the stability and functioning of the larger social system. For example, family groups socialize

children, while work groups contribute to economic stability.

2. Conflict Perspective: Rooted in the ideas of Karl Marx, this perspective emphasizes the

inherent inequality and power struggles within and between social groups. It argues that social

groups are often in competition for resources, power, and status, which can lead to conflict and

societal change. Groups in power tend to dominate and exploit subordinate groups, leading to a

perpetual struggle between those who control resources and those who do not.

3. Symbolic Interactionist Perspective: Associated with theorists like George Herbert Mead and

Herbert Blumer, this view focuses on how individuals within social groups create and maintain

their social reality through interaction. Social groups are seen as dynamic entities shaped by the

meanings and interpretations individuals assign to their interactions. This perspective emphasizes

the importance of symbols, language, and shared meanings in the formation and function of

groups.

4. Social Exchange Theory: This theory, influenced by the work of George Homans and Peter

Blau, views social groups as systems of reciprocal exchanges. Individuals join and remain in

social groups based on the rewards (tangible or intangible) they receive. This perspective focuses

on the costs and benefits of group membership, where people seek to maximize rewards and

minimize costs through their interactions with others.

5. Feminist Perspective: Feminist sociology highlights the role of gender in shaping social

groups, focusing on how patriarchal structures and power imbalances affect group dynamics.

Feminist theorists argue that social groups are often organized in ways that marginalize women
 23

and reinforce gender inequalities. This perspective aims to uncover and challenge these

inequalities within various social group settings, such as families, workplaces, and political

organizations.

6. Network Theory: This approach examines social groups in terms of the relationships and

connections between individuals rather than focusing on the groups themselves. It studies how

social networks, including ties and relationships, influence the flow of information, resources,

and power within and between groups. Social networks are viewed as crucial for understanding

social capital and the spread of ideas and behaviors.