The "Cry of Rebellion"

The "Cry of Rebellion" occurred on the 23rd of August, 1896 at Pugad Lawin as a call of the
Philippine Revolution.Based on primary accounts and records, the most reliable account was
given by Dr. Pio Valenzuela who witnessed the incident and was also a known close ally of
Andres Bonifacio. The deposition that he also made right after the occasion as testified by the
PNHC research of the Philippine National Historical Commission. The tearing of cedulas
performed at Pugad Lawin shows the refusal of Philippine society from the Spanish colonial
rule. This event is legitimized through the testimony of the eyewitness account of Dr. Pio
Valenzuela and in research from the Philippine National Historical Commission.
On the other hand, the "Tearing of Cedulas" revolutionized the independence drive and
crystallized a protest action against the colonial government. This move greatly played a role
in the war for independence and was more than just a protest; it symbolized the Filipino
people's fight for freedom, identity, and independence. To set a defined perspective on the Cry
of Rebellion, we first place when it occurred. The event was held on August 23, 1896, in Pugad
Lawin. This date represents one of the most pivotal milestones in Philippine history: not only
does it signify a tide that rose against the waves of colonialism, but it also became the drive for
national independence. Having this pivotal moment set up, we can then delve into the causes of
this Cry of Rebellion.

During the late 19th century in the Philippines, it was a time replete with discontent over the
Spanish colonial rule that dominated this country's socio-political climate.The oppression of
governance and the emerging nationalism among the Filipinos make them all set to embark on
rebellion. Understanding these contextual elements is really important as we now begin to
peel away the layers of motivation and the lasting impact that this uprising had on the quest for
independence.

What are advantages and disadvantages of having different kinds of primary sources on the
Cry? In the primary sources that include letters, official documents, diaries, and newspaper
articles that abound for the Cry of Rebellion, there are many perks in studying them. They
allow different opinions regarding the occasion and motivation. They then offer backgrounds
regarding the political, economic, and social situation surrounding this rebellion for a deeper
understanding of why the revolt happened and its aftermath. Primary sources help in providing
authentic and reliable material hence making any research credible. Cross-checking and
verification of information across different sources gives reliable and authentic information.
Thus, with these sources, a more complex and all-rounded understanding of how the rebellion
affected the social groups, economic conditions, and even political dynamics will be realized.

Besides, it aids in developing critical and analytical skills with the use of various sources. In
this regard, students as well as researchers begin to make judgments over credible kinds of
evidence and synthesize information from various sources. This diversity introduces the
rebellion as interesting and brings it study to a more accessible readership.
The various primary sources that are involved in the Cry of Rebellion give the study itself an
added sense of importance and variety, which will bring complication to a history embracing
diversity. In that respect, the use of such an array of diverse primary sources enhances
understanding of why there was a rebellion and what motivated it as well as complexities of
history.
Disadvantage:
This is with the different kinds of primary sources regarding the Cry of Rebellion with its own
challenges:

1. Differing reports: It may contain conflicting information coming from the different sources that
cause question about the truthness of the historical facts. Different creators have different
biases and viewpoints.
2. Bias and Subjectivity Many of the primary sources, particularly those provided by participants,
might be biased, exaggerating some figures and omitting other vital information based on
political or personal preference.
3. Translation and Language Barrier Sources are mostly in different languages or dialects, thus,
which consequently yields a possibility of misinterpretation or loss of meaning while being
translated.
4. Niche Emphasis: Some writers concentrate only on tiny aspects of the uprising, for instance
on operations or key personalities in the uprising but avoid the bigger perspectives, as on the
experiences of ordinary citizens or the variations that existed between the regions.
5. Authenticity and Access Problems: Authenticity of some primary sources can not be proven
easily, as rare documents or oral traditions may have been distorted overtime.
6. Contextual Differences: Personal letters or any other source might be full of contextual
information, but an official document may not provide enough detail, which creates difficulty in
forming coherent narratives.

Evidence:
1. Eyewitness Account: A close friend of Andres Bonifacio, Dr. Pio Valenzuela was an actual
eyewitness to the "Cry of Rebellion" during Pugad Lawin. The personal account combined with
the research of the Philippine National Historical Commission (PNHC) explains why this is an
important event in Philippine history.
2. Destruction of Cedulas: The gesture symbolized negation of the Spanish rule. According to
Valenzuela, this action did not merely manifest itself as a form of protest but was considered
part of the fight for independence or a declaration of the Filipino struggle for liberation and
identity.
3. Historical Background: At the closing years of Philippines during the 19th century, oppression
and rising nationalism could be felt. Therefore, before one could answer why it was an uprising,
research in the historical background would also be a good precondition for understanding.
4. Varying Sources: Letters and newspaper clippings are primary sources that shed different
points of views over the "Cry of Rebellion." These add flavors of undergoing the events and its
impact on society.

Examples:
One of the crucial events in Philippine history is "Cry of Rebellion, which happened on 23 rd
August 1896 Pugad Lawin ".
Witnessed and attested to by Dr. Pio Valenzuela and authenticated by the Philippine National
Historical Commission, that is why "Tearing of Cedulas" is quite essential. It was a strong act
against Spanish rule and an extremely important event in the fight for independence.
We must understand this rebellion by looking properly at how Filipinos suffered during such
hard conditions under Spanish rule, as well as the surging sense of nationalism of that
time.Analyzing primary sources, like personal letters and newspaper articles, would reveal
different reasons for the rebellion and how that impacted the country at large. It is quite
complicated in an important event in the battle for freedom.