FIVE NET INTERNETS PVT LTD

INTRODUCTION
FIVE NET is a Category ‘A’ Internet Service Providers (ISP), engaged in
providing internet and other related value added services to its customers under the
brand I-On. Incorporated in 2016 with the objective of providing integrated telecom
and IT services, FIVE NET has positioned itself as a technology partner for its
customers. They provide wireless broadband access and a suite of value added
services with a distinctive delivery mechanism based on the “build own and
operative model”.

FIVE NET has the privilege of setting up perhaps India’s largest AREA of
Bathinda is Bibi wala road . The seamless network is spread over approx. 5 sq. kms
and is capable of supporting 15000 subscribers. The network already has 8000+
subscribers who can access Internet and other value added services with a single
sign-on, anytime… be it their hostel rooms, roads, canteens, food court, library or
the administration block.

FIVE NET is very much aware of the security exposure of Wi-Fi services
especially as medium to access Internet. In the line with the need of the hour, FIVE
NET has drawn up a plan to comply with several of standards, both from the
network security and from the policy / procedure / standards perspective.

FIVE NET is currently implementing ISO: 27001. The framework touches

each and every aspects of FIVE NET activity, services and delivery; thereby
ensuring that the quality of services standard is consistently met and adhered to
FIVE NET ensures that the services are free of known malicious activities.

• Directors of FIVE NET INTERNETSS PRIVATE LIMITED

Directors ID Number Name Designation Date of Appointment
U72900PB2016PTC045503 Daljeet singh Director 12 July 2016
 • Need for the Study:-

FIVE NET INTERNETS Pvt Ltd is the well growing organization in the
market especially in the internet services. To know how the each and every
department in the organization functions. The techniques and strategies used by the
organization.
The company mainly provide internet services to its customers.
The present study was concentrated on working capital management at FIVE
NET INTERNETS Pvt LTD. Because working capital is very important for every
organization, either it is big or small. It shows the liquidity position of the company,
as it involves only current assets and current liabilities are those which can be
converted into cash in days or weeks. So studying the current cash position, etc. is
very useful in planning future activities of the organization.

• Best practices of the company:-

• Company adapt the technique of the zero investment by the
customer for procuring the products and services of the company.
• They follow the niche marketing strategy for the promotion of the products
and

services.
• The adoption of the 24/7 customer services and the quick
monitoring the connection problems in the internet
The good work place for the employee’s to accomplish the targets
 INDUSTRY PROFILE

INDUSRTY PROFILE
An Internet service provider (ISP) is an organization that provides services
for accessing, using, or participating in the Internet. Internet service providers may
be organized in various forms, such as commercial, community-owned, non-profit,
or otherwise privately owned.

Internet services typically provided by ISPs include Internet access, Internet

transit, domain name registration, web hosting, Usenet service, colocation.

• HISTORY
The Internet was developed as a network between government research
laboratories and participating departments of universities. By the late 1980s, a
process was set in place towards public, commercial use of the Internet. The
remaining restrictions were removed by 1995, 4 years after the introduction of the
World .

In 1989, the first ISPs were established in Australia, and the United States.
In Brookline, Massachusetts, The World became the first commercial ISP in the US.
Its first customer was served in November 1989.

On 23 April 2014, the U.S. Federal Communications Commission (FCC)

was reported to be considering a new rule that will permit ISPs to offer content
providers a faster track to send content, thus reversing their earlier net neutrality
position. A possible solution to net neutrality concerns may be municipal
broadband, according to Professor Susan Crawford, a legal and technology expert at
Harvard Law School. On 15 May 2014, the FCC decided to consider two options
regarding Internet services: first, permit fast and slow broadband lanes, thereby
compromising net neutrality; and second, reclassify broadband as a
telecommunication service, thereby preserving net neutrality. On 10 November
2014, President Barack Obama recommended that the FCC reclassify broadband
Internet service as a telecommunications service in order to preserve net neutrality.
On 16 January 2015, Republicans presented legislation, in the form of a U.S.
Congress H.R. discussion draft bill, that makes concessions to net neutrality but
prohibits the FCC from accomplishing the goal or enacting any further regulation
affecting Internet service providers. On 31 January 2015, AP News reported that the
FCC will present the notion of applying ("with some caveats") Title of
the Communications to the internet in a vote expected on 26 February 2015.
Adoption of this notion would reclassify internet service from one of information to

one of telecommunications and, according to Tom Wheeler, chairman of the

FCC, ensure net neutrality. The FCC is expected to enforce net neutrality in its vote,
according to the New York Times.

On 26 February 2015, the FCC ruled in favor of net neutrality by adopting

Title II (common carrier) of the Communications Act of 1934 and Section 706 in the
Telecommunications act of 1996 to the Internet. The FCC Chairman, Tom Wheeler,
commented, "This is no more a plan to regulate the Internet than the First
Amendment is a plan to regulate free speech. They both stand for the same
concept."

On 12 March 2015, the FCC released the specific details of the net neutrality
rules. On 13 April 2015, the FCC published the final rule on its new "Net
Neutrality" regulations.

• CLASSIFICATION
Access providers ISP
 ISPs provide Internet access, employing a range of technologies to connect
users to their network. Available technologies have ranged from computer
modems with acoustic couplers to telephone lines, to television cable (CATV),
wireless Ethernet (Wi-Fi), and fiber optics.

For users and small businesses, traditional options include copper wires to
provide dial-up, DSL (typically asymmetricline (ADSL), cable modem or
Integrated Services Digital Network (ISDN) (typically basic rate interface). Using
fiber-optics to end users is called Fiber to the Home or similar names.

For customers with more demanding requirements (such as medium-to-large

businesses, or other ISPs) can use higher-speed DSL (such as single-pair subscriber
line), Ethernet, metropolitan Ethernet, gigabit Ethernet, Frame Relay, ISDN Primary
Rate Interface, "Mode) and optical networking (SONET).

Wireless access is another option, including satelliteaccess.

Edge providers
Edge providers create Internet content.

Mailbox providers
A mailbox is an organization that provides services for hosting electronic
mail domains with access to storage for mail boxes. It provides email servers to
send, receive, accept, and store email for end users or other organizations.

Many mailbox providers are also access providers, while others are
not (e.g., Yahoo! Mail, Outlook.com, Gmail, AOL Mail, post box). The
definition given in RFC 6650 covers email hosting services, as well as the relevant
department of companies, universities, organizations, groups, and individuals that
manage their mail servers themselves. The task is typically accomplished by
implementing Simple Mail Transfer Protocol (SMTP) and possibly providing access
to messages through Internet Message Access Protocol (IMAP), the Post Office
Protocol, Webmail, or a proprietary protocol.

Peering
 ISPs may engage in peering, where multiple ISPs interconnect at peering
points or Internet exchange points (IXs), allowing routing of data between each
network, without charging one another for the data transmitted—data that would
otherwise have passed through a third upstream ISP, incurring charges from the
upstream ISP.

ISPs requiring no upstream and having only customers (end customers

and/or peer ISPs) are called Tier 1 ISPs.

Network hardware, software and specifications, as well as the expertise of

network management personnel are important in ensuring that data follows the most
efficient route, and upstream connections work reliably. A tradeoff between cost and
efficiency is possible.
• Challenges faced by the internet service providers
Given the significant transformation in the telecommunications industry and
the reduction in both top line revenues and margins, I would like to present the top
10 challenges for Service Providers (SPs) going into 2014. I will follow this up
with some suggested solutions in my next blog, including how to address these
problems, increase reserves and free up some much needed cash.
• Network Security: Service providers are seeing significant strains on their
networks from malicious malware, Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) attacks
and Advanced Persistent Threats (APTs). Large amounts of time, cash and resources
are being invested to address security on their networks. The increase and
sophistication of attacks has surpassed the ability of current security solutions to
keep up, thereby creating significant network challenges for SPs.
• Network Congestion: How do you plan for capacity when mobility induces
temporary congestion and network traffic spikes with little warning? It is all about
network coverage
- when you combine that with the balance sheet of the company the SP with highest
network pop coverage will be the biggest winner.
• All-You-Can-Eat Connectivity Services: Good for content providers, but bad
for SPs. OTT players are increasing bandwidth at a rapid pace. Service providers
can use the analytical data to extract knowledge and use that data to gain additional
top line revenue.
• Peer-to-Peer Traffic: It's growing fast, but there is no business model in sight to
monetize peer-to-peer traffic. This puts a significant strain on the service provider
network and will drive higher capex, impacting cash flow and reserves.
• Over-the-Top Video: Service providers see their networks being drained by this
kind of traffic. Video-on-demand delivery is using up large amounts of bandwidth
with no returns. The business model for OTT players needs to be optimized for
revenues. Allowing companies that produce video with no care for its distribution
will not scale and is already causing significant issues across networks.
• Flat ARPU: There is a significant discrepancy between the growth requirements
and the capex requirements to support 50% growth year over year. Add in Smart TV
and IOT, and capex becomes a major factor in scaling platforms for higher revenue.
• IPv6: This is a massive "must do" with no incremental revenue attached. Many
customers are beginning to demand IPv6 but the business case is lacking. It will be
very challenging for any SP CFO or CIO to view this as a cost of doing business
considering the costs involved.
• Regulations: Net neutrality is hampering a packet monetization solution that
could make service provider traffic more profitable. I just don’t see a pay as you go
business model being allowed by the regulators.
• The Inability to Monetize Packet Traffic: Service providers are living with
low- margin "dumb"-pipe revenues while Google and others are gaining high-
margin traffic

via over-the-top applications. This isn't sustainable for SPs, especially on wireless
networks where spectrum is constrained.
• Customer Churn: When customers aren't happy, they churn. When they churn,
service providers lose money. As churn goes down with customer loyalty and
satisfaction, revenue should go up and costs should come down as well balancing
nice top line revenue along with superlative margin.