How To Make Chapter 2 & 3
How To Make Chapter 2 & 3
The purpose of Chapter 2 is to provide the reader with a comprehensive review of the literature
related to the problem under investigation. The review of related literature should greatly expand
upon the introduction and background information presented in Chapter 1. This chapter may
contain theories and models relevant to the problem, a historical overview of the problem,
current trends related to the problem, and significant research data published about the
problem.
- Discusses, investigates, and critiques what other authors and researchers have done in
relation to your present study.
- The Statement of the Problem, Theoretical/Conceptual Framework, and Background of
the Study from Chapter 1 may help you decide whether a certain literature/study is
relevant or irrelevant.
- Should include works from foreign and local authors
- As recent as possible (may be 5 years back)
Do’s Don'ts
- Research Design
- Population and Sampling Techniques
- Research instruments
- Data Gathering Procedures
- Statistical Tools and Treatments
❖ Research Design
- The Brief Description and justification of the Research Design used should be explained.
- Research Design in Research is categorized according to the procedure the researcher
collects and analyzes data and her research purpose.
- Two types of Research Design: Qualitative and Quantitative Research.
Example:
Qualitative and Quantitative Research Similarities and Differences
Similarities Differences
Qualitative Research Share concerns “in problem Deals directly with historical
finding, in explaining the problems of cause and effect
relationships of data to claim, or interpretation of unique
in theory, building and social phenomena.
explaining particular cases in
Quantitative Research the light of established Represent the responses of
knowledge and theory. large number of individuals to
different kinds of stimuli
Quantitative Qualitative
Example: The study chose fifty Senior High School STEM students from Bayugan National
Comprehensive High School using Simple Random Sampling.
Population. If the population is too large, then a sampling method can be employed.
❖ Research Instruments
- It is a tool used to collect, measure, and analyze data related to your research
interests. These tools are most commonly used in health sciences, social
sciences, and education to assess patients, clients, students, teachers, staff, etc.
A research instrument can include interviews, tests, surveys, or checklists.
- Example; psychological tests, questionnaires, checklists, rating scales,
interviews, and document analysis.
Instrumentation - the process of how the instrument was made, validated, tested, and used.
● Validation of Instruments
○ Reliability and Validity are important considerations to test the effectiveness of
any data gathering device.
○ Through comments, suggestions, and corrections given by the experts in
connection with their area of specialization who are not participants in the
research study. It is suggested that questionnaires must be submitted to the
thesis/dissertation adviser for comments, suggestions, and corrections.
● Types of Validity
1. Face Validity - grammar, format, alignment of questions to SOP
2. Construct Validity- the extent to which the instrument measures the criterion
being studied.
3. Content Validity- how well the instrument measures the individual aspects of the
criterion.
4. Criterion Validity - how related the instrument is to other instrument that
measures the same variable.
QUALITATIVE RESEARCH
Qualitative research design involves collecting and analyzing non-numerical data (e.g.,
text, video, or audio) to understand concepts, opinions, or experiences. It can be used to gather
in-depth insights into a problem or generate new ideas for research.
QUANTITATIVE RESEARCH
- Refers to the various types of research methodologies and approaches used to gather
and analyze numerical data.
- It is widely utilized across various fields, including social sciences, natural sciences, and
marketing.
2. Correlational Research
- Attempts to determine the extent of a relationship between two or more variables
using statistical data.
- In this type of design, relationships between and among a number of facts are
sought and interpreted.
● Purpose: To investigate relationships between two or more variables without
manipulating them.
● Methods:
3. Causal-comparative/Quasi-experimental Research
- attempts to establish cause-effect relationships among the variables.
- An independent variable is identified but not manipulated by the experimenter, and
effects of the independent variable on the dependent variable are measured.
- These types of design are very similar to true experiments.
● Purpose- To explore the reasons behind a change that has already occurred,
focusing on existing differences between groups.
● Methods:
1.) Retrospective Causal Comparative- This method investigates existing
differences between groups after an event has occurred. Researchers
look back to determine if a particular variable influenced the outcome.
2.) Cross-Sectional Studies- This method examines data from a population
at a single point in time. Researchers analyze differences between
groups based on existing characteristics rather than manipulating any
variables.
3.) Case-Control Studies- This method compares individuals with a specific
condition (cases) to those without it (controls) to identify potential causes
or risk factors associated with that condition.
4. Experimental Research
-often called true experimentation, uses the scientific method to establish the
cause-effect relationship among a group of variables that make up a study.
-An independent variable is manipulated to determine the effects on the dependent
variables.
● Purpose- To establish cause-and-effect relationships by manipulating one
variable and observing the effect on another.
● Methods:
1.) Pre-experimental Design- This design is less rigorous than true
experimental designs and typically involves one group that is observed
before and after treatment without a control group.
Types:
a. One-Shot Case Study: A single group is exposed to a treatment,
and outcomes are measured afterward
b. One-Group Pretest-Posttest Design: The same group is tested
before and after an intervention.
c. Static-Group Comparison: Two groups are compared, but only
one receives the treatment; however, there’s no random
assignment.
2.) Factorial Design- This method examines the effects of two or more
independent variables simultaneously, allowing researchers to study
interactions between variables.
3.) Cross-Over Design- In this design, participants receive multiple
treatments in a specific sequence. Each participant serves as their own
control, which helps reduce variability in results.
2. Direct Comparisons of Results- The study can be reproduced in other cultural settings,
times or with different groups of participants. Results can be compared statistically.
3. Large Samples- Data from large samples can be processed and analyzed using reliable
and consistent procedures through quantitative data analysis.
4. Hypothesis Testing- Using formalized and established hypothesis testing procedures
means that you have to carefully consider and report your research variables,
predictions, data collection and testing methods before coming to a conclusion.
1. Convergent Parallel Design: Both qualitative and quantitative data are collected
simultaneously and analyzed separately, then compared and integrated.
2. Explanatory Sequential Design: Quantitative data is collected first, followed by
qualitative data to explain or build upon the initial findings.
Flexibility: Allows researchers to use various methods and techniques tailored to their
specific needs.
Exploratory Research: To gain insights into complex issues where little prior
knowledge exists.
Rich Data: Combines statistical trends with detailed narratives, providing depth and
breadth in analysis.
DISADVANTAGES OF MIXED METHODS