Blood 693689
Blood 693689
Blood 693689
Autoimmune hemolytic anemia (AIHA) is therapeutic approaches. To aid the clini- in the hope that this review may offer
an uncommon entity that presents diag- cian in AIHA management, we present guidance in regard to personalized ther-
nostic, prognostic, and therapeutic di- four vignettes that represent and highlight apy recommendations. A section is in-
lemmas despite being a well-recognized distinct clinical presentations with sepa- cluded for the diagnosis of suspected
entity for over 150 years. This is because rate diagnostic and therapeutic pathways AIHA with negative test results, a relative-
of significant differences in the rates of that we use in our clinical practice setting. ly infrequent but challenging situation, in
hemolysis and associated diseases and We also review the parameters present in order to assist in the overall evaluation
Submitted 28 November 2016; accepted 21 March 2017. Prepublished online © 2017 by The American Society of Hematology
as Blood First Edition paper, 30 March 2017; DOI 10.1182/blood-2016-11-
693689.
Figure 1 shows the pattern of antibodies and complement that are How do we use glucocorticoids?
typically found on erythrocyte membranes in warm and CAD
While glucocorticoids are considered the first-line treatment in
AIHA.10-13 It features the most well-characterized erythrocyte
antigens involved in AIHA and the more typical diseases or drugs WAIHA, this was empirically derived. Mechanisms of actions in-
associated with specific AIHA subtypes. These autoantibodies can clude suppression of autoantibody production, reduction in auto-
be of IgG, IgM, or IgA isotypes, but most commonly, the antibody antibody affinity, and decreased destruction of erythrocytes by splenic
is an IgG antibody in WAIHA and an IgM antibody in CAD. The macrophages, perhaps by diminished expression of Fcg receptors.21,22
IgA isotype is much less commonly involved in AIHA but may The first-ever randomized trial of newly diagnosed AIHA compared
cause severe hemolysis.14,15 The ability of the anti–erythrocyte high-dose prednisone (1.5 mg/kg per day 3 2 weeks, then tapered over
antibody to bind to the erythrocyte antigen at specific temperatures 8-12 weeks), with or without rituximab, found that 50% of patients
is fundamental to the diagnosis in terms of whether it is designated in the prednisone-only group achieved either a complete response (CR)
as warm (reacts maximally at 37°C) or cold (reacts maximally at or partial response (PR) at 3 months. However, nearly half of the
,4°C) AIHA. The pathologic and clinical features of AIHA relate responders relapsed within a year. This study was limited by small
to the autoantibody class, thermal amplitude, and their efficiency in sample size (N 5 64) and did not report the proportion of patients
needing second-line treatment after relapse. The rituximab arm had
Idiopathic;
autoimmune
IgG+ and C3- Warm Rh ± drug
disease; drug;
lymphoma
Idiopathic;
Idiopathic;
Glycophorin ± autoimmune
Warm
drug disease; drug;
lymphoma
Figure 1. Direct antiglobulin test serology and clinical aspects. Shown are the spectrum of DAT serologic findings, autoimmune hemolytic classifications, antigen
specificity, and medical/drug associations.10,11 Drugs most commonly implicated11-13,20 in drug-induced autoimmune hemolytic anemia are b lactam antibiotics (penicillin,
ceftriaxone, cefotetan, and piperacillin), nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (tolmetin, sulindac, and diclofenac), quinine, purine nucleoside analogs (fludarabine and
cladribine), and platinums (cisplatin and oxaliplatin).12,13
relapse (hemoglobin , 11g/dL or symptomatic anemia with ongoing In our experience using noncorticosteroid immunosuppressive
evidence of hemolysis); or (3) intolerance to a currently effective agents, the response may take months to be evident. Therefore, it
treatment. If hemolysis continues that is well compensated after is reasonable continue treatment of at least 8 to 12 weeks, especially
prednisone tapering, starting a second-line treatment may not be if the hemolysis rate is stable during treatment. A recent review
necessary. Similarly, DAT negativity is not essential with controlled article has more in-depth discussions of the individual treatment
hemolysis. The more commonly used treatments along with their options for relapsed or refractory disease.26
corresponding dosing schedules are displayed in Table 1.36-42 Patterns
of care studies are not available, but single-agent rituximab is perhaps
the most commonly used treatment in this setting and is our first
choice after splenectomy relapse. In a meta-analysis of 21 studies that Case 2: WAIHA associated with chronic
investigated rituximab, the overall response (OR) and CR rates were lymphocytic leukemia (CLL)
79% and 42%, respectively. The OR was similar regardless of whether
it was idiopathic or secondary AIHA (67% vs 72%).43 In studies with A 62-year old male with a history of CLL presented with profound
.3 years of follow-up, the relapse rate was ;50%. However, most fatigue. He was severely anemic with hemoglobin of 5.8 g/dL.
patients responded to rituximab retreatment.19,44 Additional laboratory test results (with reference ranges in parentheses)
Information about response rates and their duration for less used included MCV 93.5 fL, white cell count 4.0 3 109/L (3.5-10.5), platelet
drugs often varied and were frequently not reported. Many of these count 50 3 109/L (150-450), absolute lymphocyte count 1.6 3 109/L
treatments were added to corticosteroids at relapse. It is impossible (0.9-2.9), absolute reticulocyte count 10 3 109/L, haptoglobin
to determine the comparative efficacy of these treatments. We ,14 mg/dL, LDH 420 U/L, total bilirubin 2.0 mg/dL, indirect bilirubin
caution the treatment outcomes in Table 1 may look more optimistic 1.5 mg/dL (,1.0), and blood smear showing polychromasia. DAT
due to reporting bias and small study sample sizes. The choice of showed 21 anti-IgG and no anti-C3. He was treated a year ago with
treatment beyond rituximab will depend on the physician’s clinical a fludarabine/cyclophosphamide/rituximab combination regimen and
judgment, the patient’s preference, and the drug’s side effect profile. achieved a PR.
2974 GO et al BLOOD, 1 JUNE 2017 x VOLUME 129, NUMBER 22
Table 1. Pharmacologic treatment options for relapsed or refractory warm autoimmune hemolytic anemia from a case series
Median time to Median response Relapse rate
Treatment Initial dose(s) OR, % response (range) duration (range) (at 1-2 y), % Comments Reference
Azathioprine 2-4 mg/kg orally once a day 50-70 NA 11 mo (4-36) 60 N 5 9-31 19, 24, 36, 37
Cyclophosphamide 1-2 mg/kg orally once a day; or 50-70 NA 11 mo (4-36) 50 N 5 7-40 19, 24, 26, 37
(low dose) 50-150 mg orally once a day
Cyclophosphamide 50 mg/kg IV days 1-4 with mesna 100 3 wk; 82% at 15 mo (4-29) 0 For the 50 mg/kg dose, 40% 38, 39
(high dose) and granulocyte colony 4 mo hospitalization due to
stimulating factor rescue; or complications (N 5 9-17)
1000 mg IV every 4 wk 3 4
Cyclosporine 2.5 mg/kg orally twice a day 60 NA 11 mo (4-36) NA Maintain serum level 24
200-400 ng/mL (N 5 12)
Danazol 200 mg orally 3-4 times daily 60-80 NA 18 mo (7-77) 30-75 Maintenance dose 8, 40, 41
200-400 mg/day (N 5 15-22)
Mycophenolate 500-1000 mg orally twice a day 25-70 5 mo (1-9) 11 mo (4-36) NA N 5 3-4 19, 24, 42
When is erythrocyte transfusion indicated or contraindicated, there is no absolute contraindication to erythrocyte transfusion, as it
and what needs to be considered when transfusing a patient? remains a safe procedure.
Consideration of erythrocyte transfusion for hemodynamically
Do we treat the CLL or AIHA or both?
stable patients with a hemoglobin of ,7 g/dL is based on the AABB
guidelines.45 This restrictive strategy applies to the relatively We first determine whether there is an indication for the treatment
asymptomatic patient. For patients who are experiencing cardiopul- of CLL based on the International Workshop on CLL guidelines for
monary symptoms due to anemia, erythrocyte transfusion should not active disease.46 If chemotherapy is indicated, then any of the nonpurine
be withheld regardless of hemoglobin level. Because the major nucleoside analog containing chemoimmunotherapy combinations or
erythrocyte antigenic targets of the autoantibodies (Rh, Rh-related, ibrutinib may be used, since they are not known to be associated with
band 3, or glycophorin) are nearly universally present in humans,27 or cause hemolysis.47 The AIHA generally responds in parallel to CLL
special compatibility test procedures are necessary to rule out the therapy. Otherwise, the treatment is similar to what is used for AIHA in
presence of an alloantibody and proper crossmatching. These tests the nonmalignant setting.
include removing the autoantibody from the patient’s serum, leaving
behind any alloantibodies by utilizing either the patient’s (autolo- How commonly does AIHA occur during fludarabine treatment?
gous) red blood cells or selected sets of donor red blood cells
of known antigen type to adsorb the autoantibody. The adsorbed The incidence of AIHA among previously untreated patients receiving
serum (adsorbate) is then used to identify any potential allogeneic nonpurine nucleoside analog based treatment is ;2%.48 This contrasts
antibodies by reacting it against panels of red blood cells of known with the ;6% incidence among those receiving fludarabine-based
antigen type (antibody screen) and to perform crossmatching to therapy.49-51 In the latter group, the majority of cases occur during the
identify compatible erythrocytes. In severe anemia, there may be first 3 treatment cycles, although AIHA can occur at any time during
insufficient autologous erythrocytes to perform an autologous treatment and reoccur after rechallenge. Hemolytic episodes can be
adsorption. To enhance the safety of transfused erythrocytes, it severe enough to require transfusion, and fatalities have been
is possible to use erythrocytes phenotypically matched with the reported.52 One randomized trial showed that the combination
patient. This means determining the antigen profile of the patient’s of fludarabine and cyclophosphamide might have a lower incidence of
erythrocytes using typing sera for antigens toward common AIHA than fludarabine alone.50 However, this was not supported by
alloantibodies. Antigen typing of the patient’s erythrocytes should other randomized trials.49,51 In another randomized trial, the incidence
be performed prior to transfusion or at least 3 months after the of AIHA was similar (;1%) among those who received fludarabine
patient’s last transfusion to avoid potential inaccurate typing. De- and cyclophosphamide with or without rituximab.53 Thus, we
termining the “molecular phenotype” of a patient in order to provide generally discontinue fludarabine-based therapies in the setting
antigen matched red blood cells is possible and can be used in of AIHA, especially when the hemolysis is severe. Purine nucle-
transfused patients. oside analogs such as pentostatin and cladribine are also associated
While phenotyping and providing phenotypically matched eryth- with AIHA and should be avoided.54,55 If further chemotherapy
rocytes reduces the risk of hemolysis due to alloantibodies “hiding is unnecessary, we use corticosteroids alone. If additional CLL
behind” an autoantibody, it does not eliminate it. More than 400 red treatment is needed, we prefer rituximab/cyclophosphamide/
cell antigens have been identified, and typing sera are available for a dexamethasone, bendamustine/rituximab, or novel signal inhibi-
minority. Molecular phenotyping may also fail to correctly determine a tors because of their safety in this setting.56-59 These 2 chemother-
patient’s antigen type because of gene silencing through mutations apy combination regimens have been shown to effectively treat
occurring outside of antigen coding regions. The presence of these steroid-refractory AIHA. In most (.80%) of the cases, there was
other methods means that immediate discussion with the blood bank sustained control of hemolysis and CLL.58,59 Among those who
personnel is necessary to avoid delays or miscommunication and allow were receiving AIHA treatment, the initiation of ibrutinib
for timely testing. It is expected that the transfused erythrocytes, even frequently allowed discontinuation of AIHA treatment within
if phenotypically matched, will have shorter half-lives. Nevertheless, 5 months.47
BLOOD, 1 JUNE 2017 x VOLUME 129, NUMBER 22 HOW I TREAT AUTOIMMUNE HEMOLYTIC ANEMIA 2975
Table 2. Pharmacologic treatment options for relapsed or refractory cold agglutinin disease from case series
Median time To Median response Relapse rate
Treatment Initial dose OR, % response (range) duration (range) (at 1-2 y), % Comments Reference
Chlorambucil 4-20 mg orally once a day 16-46 NA 11 mo NA Included newly diagnosed 64, 65
Cyclophosphamide 50-150 mg orally once a day and previously treated
patients (N 5 19-37)
Rituximab 375 mg/m2 IV every week 3 4 wk 45-54 1.5 mo (1-2) 10 mo (8-27) 50-83 Included newly diagnosed 64, 67, 68
and previously treated
patients (N 5 20-32)
Rituximab 1 prednisone Rituximab: 100 mg IV every 56 2 wk NA 33 Included newly diagnosed 35
week 3 4 wk; Prednisone: and previously treated
1 mg/kg per day orally 3 30 d, patients (N 5 19)
then taper
Rituximab 1 fludarabine Rituximab: 375 mg/m2 IV every 76 4 mo .66 mo (3-66) 23 Grade 3-4 hematologic 73
4 wk; Fludarabine: 40 mg/m2 toxicities in 41% (N 5 29)
Are any of the recently approved CLL drugs associated electrophoresis showed a small, unquantifiable amount of IgMk
with AIHA? monoclonal protein, while Mycoplasma pneumoniae serology was
consistent with past exposure. Cold agglutinin titer was .512. Physical
Five drugs have been recently approved for use in CLL: ibrutinib, examination was unremarkable.
idelalisib, obinutuzumab, ofatumumab, and venetoclax. There is no
evidence from randomized trials to suggest that any of these agents
What should be the extent of workup for a hematologic
increases the absolute risk of AIHA.48,60-62 There is a flare phenomenon
malignancy at the time of diagnosis?
described among patients with preexisting immune cytopenias treated
with ibrutinib.57 Immune cytopenia may exacerbate shortly after In half of the cases, an autoimmune condition or infection
starting ibrutinib (within a median of 3 weeks and ranging from 2 to (M pneumoniae or Epstein-Barr virus) are identified as potential
8 weeks). The flare episode can be managed by continuation of precipitating factors.63 In the remainder, CAD is commonly associated
ibrutinib with or without the addition of corticosteroids.57 with an underlying clonal B-cell disorder similar to WAIHA. In a recent
series of non–infection-related CAD patients (N 5 89), 34% were
found to have a B-cell lymphoma, and another 47% had monoclonal
gammopathy of undetermined significance.64 The predominant mono-
Case 3: CAD clonal protein was IgMk (95%), while the rest was either IgGl or
IgAl.65 Therefore, a routine evaluation for non-Hodgkin lymphoma
A 54-year-old man with acute bronchitis was treated with azithromycin that includes bone marrow biopsy and body computed tomographic
with resolution of respiratory symptoms. Because of continued fatigue, scan should be considered when there is no obvious infection.
laboratory tests were performed, which showed hemoglobin 11.4 g/dL,
MCV 100 fL, absolute reticulocyte count 266 3 109/L, haptoglobin Who should we treat?
,14 mg/dL, LDH 295 U/L, total bilirubin 1.3 mg/dL, and indirect
bilirubin 1.0 mg/dL; the blood smear showed erythrocyte agglutina- Supportive measures aimed at avoiding cold exposures apply to all
tion. DAT showed weak1 anti-IgG and 31 anti-C3. Serum protein patients regardless of symptoms. Day-to-day practices include ade-
quate clothing for cold weather, keeping indoor thermostat at higher set
points, and avoidance of icy drinks and cold showers. If the patient is
Table 3. Mechanisms involved in DAT-negative WAIHA
admitted due to a medical event or for surgery, the application of body-
1. Erythrocyte-bound antibody below the limit of detection of standard DAT warming blankets and prewarming of IV fluids and blood products may
Erythrocytes from healthy individuals have up to 35 molecules of IgG bound to minimize the exacerbation of the hemolysis. We consider systemic
their surface.
treatment when there are substantial or disabling signs or symptoms
Standard DAT can detect .300-500 bound IgG molecules.
despite supportive measures. These include cold-induced manifesta-
WAIHA can occur with as few as 70-434 bound IgG molecules.
2. Low-affinity IgG antibodies
tions such as acrocyanosis or Raynaud phenomenon and clinical
Loosely bound antibodies are dislodged during the washing of erythrocytes or sequelae of anemia and hemolysis. CAD associated with infections is
when samples are left standing at room temperature. usually self-limited and generally does not require treatment.66 It
3. IgA antibodies is necessary to treat the underlying lymphoproliferative disorder if this
IgA antibodies may trigger phagocytosis and antibody-dependent cell cytotoxicity, is present.
resulting in hemolysis.
Standard anti–human globulin reagents do not have anti-IgA activity, as most What is the efficacy of rituximab?
polyspecific reagents contain a mixture of monoclonal anti-IgG and anti-C3d.
4. Warm-reacting IgM and monomeric IgM antibodies Despite the lack of randomized trials, single-agent rituximab is
IgM antibodies reacting at warm temperatures and monomeric IgM may not fix currently considered the first-line systemic therapy for CAD due to
complement. its superior efficacy and tolerability. Two relatively larger prospective
Standard anti–human globulin reagents do not detect IgM. However, these
studies that included newly diagnosed and previously treated patients
antibodies will detect C3d if the IgM antibody fixes complement.
(N 5 20 and N 5 27) have shown ORs ranging from 45% to 54% with
2976 GO et al BLOOD, 1 JUNE 2017 x VOLUME 129, NUMBER 22
median times to response between 1 and 2 months and median is generally lower. Treatments reported to have nearly no response are
response durations of 8 to 11 months. However, CRs were uncommon azathioprine and cladribine.65,74 Treatments reported to be effective
(,5%). The responses were similar regardless of the presence or but published as single case reports are bortezomib, eculizumab,
absence of an underlying lymphoid malignancy.67 Another pro- rituximab/bendamustine, rituximab/cyclophosphamide, and rituximab/
spective study (N 5 19) used a combination of rituximab and fludarabine/cyclophosphamide.59,75-80
prednisone and achieved a relatively shorter median time to response
(2 weeks), more CRs (56%), and fewer relapses (33% at 12 months),
suggesting a potential additive effect.35 Both standard-dose
(375 mg/m2 IV weekly 3 4) and low-dose (100 mg fixed dose IV
Case 4: DAT-negative AIHA
weekly 3 4) rituximab were effective.35,67,68
A 50-year-old male presented with a 2-week history of fatigue and
Do corticosteroids work? jaundice. He denied alcohol use, risk factors for viral hepatitis, recent
travel, and toxin exposure, and he was not taking any medication.
Older studies showed poor responses to corticosteroids (,15%
Physical examination showed icteric sclerae and hepatosplenomegaly.
OR),65,69 but recent studies suggest that corticosteroids are still
Further evaluation showed hemoglobin 6.0 g/dL, absolute reticulocyte
commonly used and have higher response rates. In one study,
count 272 3 109/L, platelet count 245 3 109/L, LDH 1000 U/L,
corticosteroids were used in 24 of 89 patients (27%), mostly (81%) as
haptoglobin ,14 mg/dL, total bilirubin 6.3 mg/dL, indirect bilirubin
first-line treatment, and produced an OR of 36%. One-third of patients
4.7 mg/dL, 2 negative DAT results, no paroxysmal hemoglobinuria
did not require additional therapy after long-term follow-up.64
clone, and blood smear with marked spherocytosis. Bone marrow
Another study (N 5 64) of patients receiving corticosteroids reported
biopsy specimen demonstrated erythroid hyperplasia. Due to worsen-
an OR of 69% (mostly PRs). Many patients had to be maintained
ing symptomatic anemia, he was transfused with 4 U erythrocytes,
on corticosteroids at higher doses compared with WAIHA patients.24
which raised the hemoglobin to 10.0 g/dL, but within 24 hours,
In one of these two recent large series, half of the patients had
hemoglobin declined to 7.5 g/dL. Because of the high index of
predominantly IgG cold agglutinin.64 Reports suggest long-term
suspicion for WAIHA, enhanced DATs were performed and detected
efficacy of corticosteroids in this latter subgroup.70,71
a low-affinity IgG antibody.
What is the value of splenectomy?
How common is DAT-negative WAIHA?
Splenectomy is generally not recommended as a treatment in CAD,
as erythrocyte destruction is known to primarily occur in the liver.72 A total of 3% to 11% of patients with hemolytic anemia clinically
In the 3 largest series of primary CAD reported in recent years (total consistent with WAIHA will have a negative DAT result.81,82
N 5 259), only 11 patients (4.2%) were treated with splenectomy, A negative test result, considered critical for the diagnosis of WAIHA,
although, surprisingly, 3 (27.3%) responded with a response may lead physicians to reject the diagnosis, resulting in additional
duration between 5 and 15 months.24,64,65 The antibody specificities patient evaluation and delays in treatment. It is therefore important to
of the DAT in these patients were not reported. There are anecdotal recognize the existence of DAT-negative WAIHA. The most common
reports that some patients with predominantly IgG cold agglutinin “cause” of DAT-negative WAIHA is technical. Approximately 10% to
may achieve a durable response to splenectomy.70 50% of patients with DAT-negative WAIHA will have a positive
standard DAT result using anti-IgG and anti-C3d reagents retested at
How do we treat subsequent relapse or refractory disease? immunohematology reference laboratories.81,83,84 If suspicion of
WAIHA remains high, DAT should be repeated, preferably by an
Data on the efficacy of alternative systemic treatments are limited immunohematology reference laboratory. The presenting clinical
for CAD. A summary of case treatment series with reported efficacy features and treatment responses of patients with DAT-negative
in CAD are shown in Table 2.73 While most immunosuppressive or WAIHA are similar to those of patients with DAT-positive
cytotoxic agents used in WAIHA have been tested in CAD, the efficacy WAIHA.85
BLOOD, 1 JUNE 2017 x VOLUME 129, NUMBER 22 HOW I TREAT AUTOIMMUNE HEMOLYTIC ANEMIA 2977
How do we test for DAT-negative AIHA? relapsed setting. Novel strategic therapies can be devised based on
known pathophysiology that would improve on the decrease or
The identified mechanisms by which erythrocyte antibody escapes
removal of autoantibody production and/or reduce the phagocytosis
recognition by standard DAT are listed in Table 3.81,82 There are of antibody/complement-coated erythrocytes. There is an ongoing
several “enhanced” DATs that can be performed to detect one or phase 2 trial (NCT02612558) evaluating the use of a syk inhibitor,
more of the described mechanisms. The more common enhanced fostamatinib, in the therapy of refractory AIHA, a phase 3 trial of
DATs are shown in Table 4.81,82 No single enhanced DAT will rituximab in upfront therapy of AIHA (NCT01181154), and a completed
detect all potential hemolytic mechanisms requiring a panel of tests. trial of low-dose rituximab plus prednisone (NCT01345708 and
NCT00309881). Given the role of interaction of IgG with the Fc
Conclusion and challenges
g receptor [FcgR] or the neonatal Fc receptor [FcRn] in autoimmune
The etiology of AIHA remains incompletely understood; however, the disease, there is growing interest in blockade or modulation of these
mechanisms of erythrocyte destruction and the clinical complications latter receptors with various formulations of intravenous immuno-
that accompany this disorder are well defined. The clinical heteroge- globulin.86 These trials and investigations show that novel agents
neity of AIHA requires the clinician clearly define the nature of the are being tested in AIHA to enhance our effective therapeutic
References
1. Landsteiner K. Über Beziehungen zwischen dem 10. Fung M, Grossman BJ, Hillyer C, Westhoff CM. 19. Roumier M, Loustau V, Guillaud C, et al.
Blutserum und den Körperzellen. Munch Med Technical Manual. 18th ed. Bethesda, MD: AABB Characteristics and outcome of warm
Wochenschr. 1903;50:1812-1814. Press; 2014. autoimmune hemolytic anemia in adults: New
2. Donath JL. Uber paroxysmale Hamoglobinurie. 11. Arndt PA. Drug-induced immune hemolytic insights based on a single-center experience
Munch Med Wochenschr. 1904;51:1590-1593. anemia: the last 30 years of changes. with 60 patients. Am J Hematol. 2014;89(9):
Immunohematology. 2014;30(2):44-54. E150-E155.
3. Allgood JW, Chaplin H Jr. Idiopathic acquired
autoimmune hemolytic anemia. A review of forty- 12. Garratty G, Arndt PA. Drugs that have been 20. Sallah S, Wan JY, Hanrahan LR. Future
seven cases treated from 1955 through 1965. shown to cause drug-induced immune hemolytic development of lymphoproliferative disorders
Am J Med. 1967;43(2):254-273. anemia or positive direct antiglobulin tests: in patients with autoimmune hemolytic anemia.
some interesting findings since 2007. Clinical cancer research: an official journal of the
4. Mack P, Freedman J. Autoimmune hemolytic American Association for Cancer Research. 2001;
anemia: a history. Transfus Med Rev. 2000; Immunohematology. 2014;30(2):66-79.
7(4):791-794.
14(3):223-233. 13. Johnson ST, Fueger JT, Gottschall JL. One
center’s experience: the serology and drugs 21. Rosse WF. Quantitative immunology of immune
5. Coombs RR, Mourant AE, Race RR. A new test
associated with drug-induced immune hemolytic hemolytic anemia: II. The relationship of cell-
for the detection of weak and incomplete Rh
anemia–a new paradigm. Transfusion. 2007; bound antibody to hemolysis and the effect of
agglutinins. Br J Exp Pathol. 1945;26(4):255-266.
47(4):697-702. treatment. J Clin Invest. 1971;50(4):734-743.
6. Eaton WW, Rose NR, Kalaydjian A, Pedersen
MG, Mortensen PB. Epidemiology of autoimmune 14. Bardill B, Mengis C, Tschopp M, Wuillemin WA. 22. Fries LF, Brickman CM, Frank MM. Monocyte
diseases in Denmark. J Autoimmun. 2007;29(1): Severe IgA-mediated auto-immune haemolytic receptors for the Fc portion of IgG increase in
1-9. anaemia in a 48-yr-old woman. Eur J Haematol. number in autoimmune hemolytic anemia and
2003;70(1):60-63. other hemolytic states and are decreased by
7. Aladjidi N, Leverger G, Leblanc T, et al; Centre glucocorticoid therapy. J Immunol. 1983;131(3):
de Référence National des Cytopénies Auto- 15. Sokol RJ, Booker DJ, Stamps R, Booth JR, Hook
V. IgA red cell autoantibodies and autoimmune 1240-1245.
immunes de l’Enfant (CEREVANCE). New
insights into childhood autoimmune hemolytic hemolysis. Transfusion. 1997;37(2):175-181. 23. Birgens H, Frederiksen H, Hasselbalch HC,
anemia: a French national observational study 16. Conley CL, Lippman SM, Ness P. Autoimmune et al. A phase III randomized trial comparing
of 265 children. Haematologica. 2011;96(5): hemolytic anemia with reticulocytopenia. glucocorticoid monotherapy versus glucocorticoid
655-663. A medical emergency. JAMA. 1980;244(15): and rituximab in patients with autoimmune
1688-1690. haemolytic anaemia. Br J Haematol. 2013;163(3):
8. Genty I, Michel M, Hermine O, Schaeffer A, 393-399.
Godeau B, Rochant H. [Characteristics of 17. Liesveld JL, Rowe JM, Lichtman MA. Variability
autoimmune hemolytic anemia in adults: of the erythropoietic response in autoimmune 24. Barcellini W, Fattizzo B, Zaninoni A, et al. Clinical
retrospective analysis of 83 cases]. Rev Med hemolytic anemia: analysis of 109 cases. Blood. heterogeneity and predictors of outcome in
Interne. 2002;23(11):901-909. 1987;69(3):820-826. primary autoimmune hemolytic anemia: a
GIMEMA study of 308 patients. Blood. 2014;
9. Crowther M, Chan YL, Garbett IK, Lim W, Vickers 18. Arbach O, Funck R, Seibt F, Salama A.
124(19):2930-2936.
MA, Crowther MA. Evidence-based focused Erythropoietin may improve anemia in patients
review of the treatment of idiopathic warm with autoimmune hemolytic anemia associated 25. Lechner K, Jäger U. How I treat autoimmune
immune hemolytic anemia in adults. Blood. with reticulocytopenia. Transfus Med Hemother. hemolytic anemias in adults. Blood. 2010;116(11):
2011;118(15):4036-4040. 2012;39(3):221-223. 1831-1838.
2978 GO et al BLOOD, 1 JUNE 2017 x VOLUME 129, NUMBER 22
26. Zanella A, Barcellini W. Treatment of autoimmune autoimmune haemolytic anaemia. Br J Haematol. leukemia-associated autoimmune hemolytic
hemolytic anemias. Haematologica. 2014;99(10): 2013;163(1):118-122. anemia: a multicentric retrospective study of the
1547-1554. French CLL intergroup (GCFLLC/MW and
45. Carson JL, Grossman BJ, Kleinman S, et al;
27. Packman CH. Hemolytic anemia due to warm Clinical Transfusion Medicine Committee of the GOELAMS). Am J Hematol. 2015;90(3):204-207.
autoantibodies. Blood Rev. 2008;22(1):17-31. AABB. Red blood cell transfusion: a clinical 59. Gupta N, Kavuru S, Patel D, et al. Rituximab-
28. Wei Y, Ji XB, Wang YW, et al. High-dose practice guideline from the AABB*. Ann Intern based chemotherapy for steroid-refractory
dexamethasone vs prednisone for treatment of Med. 2012;157(1):49-58. autoimmune hemolytic anemia of chronic
adult immune thrombocytopenia: a prospective lymphocytic leukemia. Leukemia. 2002;16(10):
46. Hallek M, Cheson BD, Catovsky D, et al;
multicenter randomized trial. Blood. 2016;127(3): 2092-2095.
International Workshop on Chronic Lymphocytic
296-302, quiz 370. Leukemia. Guidelines for the diagnosis and 60. Byrd JC, Brown JR, O’Brien S, et al; RESONATE
29. Meyer O, Stahl D, Beckhove P, Huhn D, Salama treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia: a Investigators. Ibrutinib versus ofatumumab in
A. Pulsed high-dose dexamethasone in chronic report from the International Workshop on Chronic previously treated chronic lymphoid leukemia.
autoimmune haemolytic anaemia of warm type. Lymphocytic Leukemia updating the National N Engl J Med. 2014;371(3):213-223.
Br J Haematol. 1997;98(4):860-862. Cancer Institute-Working Group 1996 guidelines. 61. Furman RR, Sharman JP, Coutre SE, et al.
Blood. 2008;111(12):5446-5456. Idelalisib and rituximab in relapsed chronic
30. Coon WW. Splenectomy in the treatment of
hemolytic anemia. Arch Surg. 1985;120(5): 47. Rogers KA, Ruppert AS, Bingman A, et al. lymphocytic leukemia. N Engl J Med. 2014;
625-628. Incidence and description of autoimmune 370(11):997-1007.
cytopenias during treatment with ibrutinib for 62. Hillmen P, Robak T, Janssens A, et al;
inhibitor eculizumab in cold agglutinin disease. 80. Bhattacharyya J, Mihara K, Takihara Y, Kimura A. characteristics of patients with suspected direct
Blood. 2009;113(16):3885-3886. Successful treatment of IgM-monoclonal antiglobulin test (DAT)-negative immune
gammopathy of undetermined significance hemolytic anemia. Immunohematology. 2015;
77. Shapiro R, Chin-Yee I, Lam S. Eculizumab as a associated with cryoglobulinemia and cold 31(3):108-115.
bridge to immunosuppressive therapy in severe agglutinin disease with immunochemotherapy
cold agglutinin disease of anti-Pr specificity. Clin with rituximab, fludarabine, and 84. Leger RM, Co A, Hunt P, Garrity G. Attempts to
Case Rep. 2015;3(11):942-944. cyclophosphamide. Ann Hematol. 2012; support an immune etiology in 800 patients with
91(5):797-799. direct antiglobulin test-negative hemolytic anemia.
78. Gueli A, Gottardi D, Hu H, Ricca I, De Crescenzo Immunohematology. 2010;26(4):156-160.
A, Tarella C. Efficacy of rituximab-bendamustine 81. Garratty G. Immune hemolytic anemia associated
in cold agglutinin haemolytic anaemia refractory to with negative routine serology. Semin Hematol. 85. Kamesaki T, Toyotsuji T, Kajii E. Characterization
previous chemo-immunotherapy: a case report. 2005;42(3):156-164. of direct antiglobulin test-negative autoimmune
Blood Transfus. 2013;11(2):311-314. 82. Segel GB, Lichtman MA. Direct antiglobulin hemolytic anemia: a study of 154 cases. Am J
(“Coombs”) test-negative autoimmune hemolytic Hematol. 2013;88(2):93-96.
79. Vassou A, Alymara V, Chaidos A, Bourantas KL.
Beneficial effect of rituximab in combination with anemia: a review. Blood Cells Mol Dis. 2014; 86. Zuercher AW, Spirig R, Baz Morelli A, Käsermann
oral cyclophosphamide in primary chronic cold 52(4):152-160. F. IVIG in autoimmune disease - Potential next
agglutinin disease. Int J Hematol. 2005;81(5): 83. Karafin MS, Denomme GA, Schanen M, generation biologics. Autoimmun Rev. 2016;
421-423. Gottschall JL. Clinical and reference lab 15(8):781-785.