0% found this document useful (0 votes)

245 views68 pages

DN-P-142 - 002transverse Design of Box Girder

Uploaded by

pradeepkapla.120

We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.

Available Formats

Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

0% found this document useful (0 votes)

245 views68 pages

DN-P-142 - 002transverse Design of Box Girder

Uploaded by

pradeepkapla.120

We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.

Available Formats

Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

You are on page 1/ 68

Client : EXECUTIVE ENGINEER (B&R), HPPWD DIVISION RAMPUR, DISTRICT

SHIMLA.

Project Name : CONSTRUCTION OF 38.000 METER SPAN BRIDGE OVER KRODA KHAD ON
RAMPUR GAURA MASHNOO JEORI ROAD AT RD 35/825.
Title :
TRANSVERSE ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF BOX GIRDER
Design Note No. : DN/P-142/002
Rev. No : R0
Date : 18 July 2024
Calculation by : SK
Checked by : ARK
Approved by : PK

Consultants : Infrastructure Technologies

Innovative Infrastructure Engineering Through Cutting edge Technologies
Registered Office: C-402, Kartik Kunj Appartments, Plot No. D-13,
Sector-44, Noida (U.P.) -201301, India
Head Office: 187, Block – III, Ganga Shopping Complex,
Sector – 29, Noida (U.P.) -201301, India
Phone: +91 120 4253207
Email: pk@infratech.org.in
TABLE OF CONTENTS
S.NO DESCRIPTION PAGE NO.
1 TRANSVERSE ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF BOX GIRDER 1
1.1 ANALYSIS BOX GIRDER IN TRANSVERSE DIRECTION 1
1.1.1 STRUCTURAL MODEL 1
1.1.2 LOADS 2
1.1.2.1 SELF WEIGHT OF SLAB (SW) 2
1.1.2.2 SUPERIMPOSED DEAD LOAD OF CRASH BARRIER (SD) 2
1.1.2.3 SUPERIMPOSED DEAD LOAD OF SURFACEING (SDS) 2
1.1.2.4 LIVE LOAD (LL) 2
1.1.2.4.1 1 LANE CLASS - A 3
1.1.2.4.2 2 LANE CLASS - A 6
1.1.2.4.3 1 LANE 40T BOGGIE (L-TYPE) 6
1.1.2.4.4 1 LANE 40T BOGGIE (M-TYPE) 8
1.1.2.4.5 1 LANE 40T BOGGIE (N-TYPE) 11
1.1.2.4.6 1 LANE 70R TRACK 13
1.1.2.5 THERMAL LOADS 16
1.1.2.5.1 OVERALL TEMPERATURE (OT) 16
1.1.2.5.2 DIFFERENTIAL TEMPERATURE (TGRAD) 16
1.1.2.6 LOAD COMBINATION 16
1.1.3 RESULTS OF ANALYSIS 17
1.1.3.1 SECTIONS FOR RESULT TABULATION 17
1.1.3.2 BM ENVELOPE FOR ULS BASIC COMBINATION 18
1.1.3.3 BM ENVELOPE FOR SLS RARE COMBINATION 20
1.1.3.4 BM ENVELOPE FOR SLS QUASI-PERMANENT COMBINATION 22
1.2 ANALYSIS OF OVERHANG SLAB AT EXPANSION JOINT 24
1.2.1 STRUCTURAL BEHAVIOUR 24
1.2.2 LOADS 24
1.2.2.1 SELF WEIGHT (SW) 24
1.2.2.2 SUPERIMPOSED DEAD LOAD OF CRASH BARRIER (SD) 24
1.2.2.3 SUPERIMPOSED DEAD LOAD OF SURFACEING (SDS) 24
1.2.2.4 LIVE LOAD (LL) 24
1.2.2.4.1 CLASS-A 2 LANE 24
1.2.2.4.2 1 LANE 20T SINGLE AXLE (L-TYPE) 25
1.2.2.4.3 1 LANE 20T SINGLE AXLE (M-TYPE) 25
1.2.2.4.4 1 LANE 20T SINGLE AXLE (N-TYPE) 26
1.2.2.4.5 1 LANE 70R TRACK 26
1.2.2.5 LOAD COMBINATION AND ANALYSIS RESULT 27
1.3 ANALYSIS OF SLAB ADJECENT TO CROSS GIRDER 27
1.3.1 STRUCTURAL BEHAVIOUR 27
1.3.2 LOADS 27
1.3.2.1 SELF WEIGHT (SW) 27
1.3.2.2 SUPERIMPOSED DEAD LOAD OF CRASH BARRIER (SD) 27
1.3.2.3 SUPERIMPOSED DEAD LOAD OF SURFACEING (SDS) 28
1.3.2.4 LIVE LOAD (LL) 28
1.3.2.4.1 CLASS A WHEEL 28
1.3.2.4.2 1 LANE 20T SINGLE AXLE (L-TYPE) WHEEL 29
1.3.2.5 LOAD COMBINATION AND ANALYSIS RESULT 29
1.4 RCC DESIGN OF DECK SLAB 30
1.4.1 DESIGN SECTIONS 30
1.4.2 DIMENSIONS 30
1.4.3 ULS DESIGN FORCES AND MOMENTS 31
1.4.3.1 ULS MOMENT AND AXIAL FORCE 31
1.4.3.2 ULS SHEAR 31
1.4.4 SLS DESIGN MOMENT AND FORCES 32
1.4.4.1 MOMENTS IN SLS RARE COMBINATION 32
1.4.4.2 MOMENT & AXIAL FORCE IN SLS QUASI-PERMANENT COMBINATION 32
1.4.5 MATERIAL DATA 32
1.4.5.1 CONCRETE 32
1.4.5.2 STEEL 33
1.4.6 DESIGN OF BOX COMPONENTS FOR ULS COMBINATION 33
1.4.6.1 REINFORCEMENT REQUIRED FOR DIRECT TENSION IF PRESENT 33
1.4.6.2 REINFORCEMENT REQUIRED FOR BENDING MOMENT 34

i
TABLE OF CONTENTS
S.NO DESCRIPTION PAGE NO.
1.4.6.3 CHECK FOR MIN. & MAX. LIMITS OF REINFORCEMENT 35
1.4.6.4 DISTRIBUTION RREINFORCEMENT CALCULATION 35
1.4.6.5 CHECK FOR SURFACE REINFORCEMENT 36
1.4.6.6 CHECK FOR MAX. LIMITS FOR TOTAL REINFORCEMENT 36
1.4.7 ULS SHEAR CHECK 37
1.4.8 SLS STRESS CHECK FOR SLS RARE COMBINATION 39
1.4.8.1 SLS STRESS CHECK AT BRIDGE OPENING 39
1.4.8.2 SLS STRESS CHECK AT END OF SERVICE LIFE 41
1.4.9 SLS CRACK WIDTH OF BOX COMPONENTS FOR SLS QUASI-PERMANENT COMBINATION 44
1.4.9.1 CHECK FOR MINIMUM REINFORCEMENT FOR CRACK CONTROL 44
1.4.9.2 CRACK WIDTH CHECK 46
2 DESIGN OF DIAPHRAGM 49
2.1 STRUCTURAL MODEL (STRUT AND TIE FORCES FOR HOGGING) 49
2.1.1 STRUT AND TIE FORCES AND DESIGN IN NORMAL CONDITION 49
2.1.2 STRUT AND TIE FORCES AND DESIGN IN JACK UP CONDITION 50
2.2 ANALYSIS AND DESIGN FOR NORMAL SAGGING CONDITION 52
2.2.1 LOADING ZONE FOR DIAPHRAGM 52
2.2.2 LOADS 52
2.2.2.1 SELF WEIGHT (SW) 52
2.2.2.2 SUPERIMPOSED DEAD LOAD OF CRASH BARRIER (SD) 53
2.2.2.3 SUPERIMPOSED DEAD LOAD OF SURFACEING (SDS) 53
2.2.2.4 LIVE LOAD (LL) 53
2.2.2.4.1 CLASS-A 2 LANE LODING 54
2.2.2.4.2 70R WHEELED L-TYPE 55
2.2.2.4.3 70R WHEELED M-TYPE 56
2.2.2.4.4 70R WHEELED N-TYPE 57
2.2.2.4.5 70R MAX. BOGIE LOAD L-TYPE 58
2.2.2.4.6 70R MAX. BOGIE LOAD M-TYPE 59
2.2.2.4.7 70R MAX. BOGIE LOAD N-TYPE 60
2.2.2.4.8 70R TRACKED VEHICLE 61
2.2.2.4.9 GOVERNING LIVE LOAD MOMENT INCLUDING IMPACT 62
2.2.2.5 LOAD COMBINATIONS (ULS BASIC COMBINATION) 62
2.2.3 DESIGN METHOD TO BE ADOPTED 63
2.2.4 CALCULATION OF POSITIVE REINFORCEMENT FOR SAGGING MOMENT 63
2.3 CALCULATION OF VERTICAL REINFORCEMENT 64
2.4 CALCULATION OF HANGING VERTICAL REINFORCEMENT 64

ii
Project CONSTRUCTION OF 38.000 METER SPAN BRIDGE OVER KRODA KHAD ON RAMPUR GAURA MASHNOO JEORI ROAD AT RD 35/825.
Consultant: Infrastructure Technologies

Client EXECUTIVE ENGINEER (B&R), HPPWD DIVISION RAMPUR, DISTRICT SHIMLA.

Calculation by SK Design Note No. DN/P-142/002
Cheked by ARK Rev. No R0
Title TRANSVERSE ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF BOX GIRDER
Approved by PK Date 18 July 2024

1 TRANSVERSE ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF BOX GIRDER

1.1 ANALYSIS BOX GIRDER IN TRANSVERSE DIRECTION

1.1.1 STRUCTURAL MODEL

A Indipendent Framed structural model (3D Beam elements of crossection 1m x thickness of slab/walls, supported at long girder Centreline) is developed in RM Bridge software for Analys of Box Girder in transverse direction.Figures
Below shows the structural Model for transverse Box Girder analysis. Crossection based on 1m width x thickness of slab/walls is used in the structural model to define section properties

Framed Structural Model with 3D Beam Elements for Transverse Analysis (Spring Support Indicate Position of Main Girder)

Page 1 of 65
Project CONSTRUCTION OF 38.000 METER SPAN BRIDGE OVER KRODA KHAD ON RAMPUR GAURA MASHNOO JEORI ROAD AT RD 35/825.
Consultant: Infrastructure Technologies

Client EXECUTIVE ENGINEER (B&R), HPPWD DIVISION RAMPUR, DISTRICT SHIMLA.

Calculation by SK Design Note No. DN/P-142/002
Cheked by ARK Rev. No R0
Title TRANSVERSE ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF BOX GIRDER
Approved by PK Date 18 July 2024
1.1.2 LOADS

1.1.2.1 SELF WEIGHT OF SLAB (SW)

Self weight of girder within effective width is automatically applied in software with unit weight as 25 KN/m3

1.1.2.2 SUPERIMPOSED DEAD LOAD OF CRASH BARRIER (SD)

2
Area Of Crossection 0.326 m
Weight per m 8.147694 kN/m
Load 8.147694 kN

1.1.2.3 SUPERIMPOSED DEAD LOAD OF SURFACEING (SDS)

Thickness 65 mm
2
Weight per unit area 1.625 kN/m

1.1.2.4 LIVE LOAD (LL)

Live Load calculations as per Effective Width Method
The live load intensity on deck slab is calculated based on effective width method as given in Annexure-B.3 of IRC-112. The dispersion along span of deck slab is ignored, this is a safer side assumption as concentrated load produce
worst effect than udl.
C/C Spacing of Webs (lo) = 3.700 m
Total Width of Deck = 8.50 m
Cantilever length Start = 2.250 m
Cantilever length End = 2.250 m
Number of support = 2
width of slab from Diaphragm to Diphragm (b) 37.600
b/lo = 10.162
a (Constant) = 2.600 (For Continuous Slab)
Thickness of wearing coat = 65.00 mm
Thickness of deck slab = 0.250 mm
Width of Crash Barrier = 0.5 m

Page 2 of 65
Project CONSTRUCTION OF 38.000 METER SPAN BRIDGE OVER KRODA KHAD ON RAMPUR GAURA MASHNOO JEORI ROAD AT RD 35/825.
Consultant: Infrastructure Technologies

Client EXECUTIVE ENGINEER (B&R), HPPWD DIVISION RAMPUR, DISTRICT SHIMLA.

Calculation by SK Design Note No. DN/P-142/002
Cheked by ARK Rev. No R0
Title TRANSVERSE ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF BOX GIRDER
Approved by PK Date 18 July 2024

Zone 1 2 3 4 5
Zone width 2.2500 0.300 3.400 0.300 2.2500
Distances 0 2.2500 2.550 5.950 6.250 8.500
from start of X
deck

1.1.2.4.1 1 LANE CLASS - A

Load on Wheel-1 = 57 kN
Load on Wheel-2 = 57 kN
Contact width across span = 250 mm
Contact width along span = 500 mm
Distance between two vehicle c/c of wheels (Traffic Direction) = 1.200 m
Distance between two Wheels C/C (Transverse direction) = 1.800 m
Minimum edge distance upto c/l of wheel = 0.400 m
b1 = 0.380 m

Page 3 of 65
Project CONSTRUCTION OF 38.000 METER SPAN BRIDGE OVER KRODA KHAD ON RAMPUR GAURA MASHNOO JEORI ROAD AT RD 35/825.
Consultant: Infrastructure Technologies

Client EXECUTIVE ENGINEER (B&R), HPPWD DIVISION RAMPUR, DISTRICT SHIMLA.

Calculation by SK Design Note No. DN/P-142/002
Cheked by ARK Rev. No R0
Title TRANSVERSE ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF BOX GIRDER
Approved by PK Date 18 July 2024
initial position of first wheel = 0.900 m
Final position of first wheel = 5.800 m
Number of load generation = 49 Nos
Transverse increament of Wheels = 0.100 m
Impact factor = 1.5

Wheel-1 Wheel-2
Load Dist. of P with Dist. of P with
Case Position Position
Nearest beff beff (mod) Impact Nearest beff beff (mod) Impact
(X) (X)
Support (kN) Support (kN)
1 0.900 1.35 2.00 1.60 52.15 2.70 0.15 0.75 0.75 110.6
2 1.000 1.25 1.88 1.54 54.18 2.80 0.25 0.99 0.99 84.6
3 1.100 1.15 1.76 1.48 56.38 2.90 0.35 1.20 1.20 69.4
4 1.200 1.05 1.64 1.42 58.76 3.00 0.45 1.41 1.30 64.0
5 1.300 0.95 1.52 1.36 61.36 3.10 0.55 1.60 1.40 59.7
6 1.400 0.85 1.40 1.30 64.19 3.20 0.65 1.77 1.49 56.1
7 1.500 0.75 1.28 1.24 67.29 3.30 0.75 1.93 1.57 53.2
8 1.600 0.65 1.16 1.16 71.93 3.40 0.85 2.08 1.64 50.8
9 1.700 0.55 1.04 1.04 80.23 3.50 0.95 2.22 1.71 48.9
10 1.800 0.45 0.92 0.92 90.70 3.60 1.05 2.34 1.77 47.2
11 1.900 0.35 0.80 0.80 104.30 3.70 1.15 2.44 1.82 45.8
12 2.000 0.25 0.68 0.68 122.71 3.80 1.25 2.53 1.87 44.7
13 2.100 0.15 0.56 0.56 149.01 3.90 1.35 2.61 1.90 43.8
14 2.200 0.05 0.44 0.44 189.64 4.00 1.45 2.67 1.94 43.1
15 2.300 0.05 0.38 0.38 219.59 4.10 1.55 2.72 1.96 42.6
16 2.400 0.15 0.38 0.38 219.59 4.20 1.65 2.76 1.98 42.2
17 2.500 0.05 0.38 0.38 219.59 4.30 1.65 2.76 1.98 42.2
18 2.600 0.05 0.51 0.51 164.18 4.40 1.55 2.72 1.96 42.6
19 2.700 0.15 0.75 0.75 110.64 4.50 1.45 2.67 1.94 43.1
20 2.800 0.25 0.99 0.99 84.62 4.60 1.35 2.61 1.90 43.8
21 2.900 0.35 1.20 1.20 69.42 4.70 1.25 2.53 1.87 44.7
22 3.000 0.45 1.41 1.30 64.00 4.80 1.15 2.44 1.82 45.8
23 3.100 0.55 1.60 1.40 59.66 4.90 1.05 2.34 1.77 47.2

Page 4 of 65
Project CONSTRUCTION OF 38.000 METER SPAN BRIDGE OVER KRODA KHAD ON RAMPUR GAURA MASHNOO JEORI ROAD AT RD 35/825.
Consultant: Infrastructure Technologies

Client EXECUTIVE ENGINEER (B&R), HPPWD DIVISION RAMPUR, DISTRICT SHIMLA.

Calculation by SK Design Note No. DN/P-142/002
Cheked by ARK Rev. No R0
Title TRANSVERSE ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF BOX GIRDER
Approved by PK Date 18 July 2024
Wheel-1 Wheel-2
Load Dist. of P with Dist. of P with
Case Position Position
Nearest beff beff (mod) Impact Nearest beff beff (mod) Impact
(X) (X)
Support (kN) Support (kN)
24 3.200 0.65 1.77 1.49 56.13 5.00 0.95 2.22 1.71 48.9
25 3.300 0.75 1.93 1.57 53.24 5.10 0.85 2.08 1.64 50.8
26 3.400 0.85 2.08 1.64 50.84 5.20 0.75 1.93 1.57 53.2
27 3.500 0.95 2.22 1.71 48.86 5.30 0.65 1.77 1.49 56.1
28 3.600 1.05 2.34 1.77 47.21 5.40 0.55 1.60 1.40 59.7
29 3.700 1.15 2.44 1.82 45.84 5.50 0.45 1.41 1.30 64.0
30 3.800 1.25 2.53 1.87 44.72 5.60 0.35 1.20 1.20 69.4
31 3.900 1.35 2.61 1.90 43.81 5.70 0.25 0.99 0.99 84.6
32 4.000 1.45 2.67 1.94 43.09 5.80 0.15 0.75 0.75 110.6
33 4.100 1.55 2.72 1.96 42.55 5.90 0.05 0.51 0.51 164.2
34 4.200 1.65 2.76 1.98 42.18 6.00 0.05 0.38 0.38 219.6
35 4.300 1.65 2.76 1.98 42.18 6.10 0.15 0.38 0.38 219.6
36 4.400 1.55 2.72 1.96 42.55 6.20 0.05 0.38 0.38 219.6
37 4.500 1.45 2.67 1.94 43.09 6.30 0.05 0.44 0.44 189.6
38 4.600 1.35 2.61 1.90 43.81 6.40 0.15 0.56 0.56 149.0
39 4.700 1.25 2.53 1.87 44.72 6.50 0.25 0.68 0.68 122.7
40 4.800 1.15 2.44 1.82 45.84 6.60 0.35 0.80 0.80 104.3
41 4.900 1.05 2.34 1.77 47.21 6.70 0.45 0.92 0.92 90.7
42 5.000 0.95 2.22 1.71 48.86 6.80 0.55 1.04 1.04 80.2
43 5.100 0.85 2.08 1.64 50.84 6.90 0.65 1.16 1.16 71.9
44 5.200 0.75 1.93 1.57 53.24 7.00 0.75 1.28 1.24 67.3
45 5.300 0.65 1.77 1.49 56.13 7.10 0.85 1.40 1.30 64.2
46 5.400 0.55 1.60 1.40 59.66 7.20 0.95 1.52 1.36 61.4
47 5.500 0.45 1.41 1.30 64.00 7.30 1.05 1.64 1.42 58.8
48 5.600 0.35 1.20 1.20 69.42 7.40 1.15 1.76 1.48 56.4
49 5.700 0.25 0.99 0.99 84.62 7.50 1.25 1.88 1.54 54.2
50 5.800 0.15 0.75 0.75 110.64 7.60 1.35 2.00 1.60 52.2

Page 5 of 65
Project CONSTRUCTION OF 38.000 METER SPAN BRIDGE OVER KRODA KHAD ON RAMPUR GAURA MASHNOO JEORI ROAD AT RD 35/825.
Consultant: Infrastructure Technologies

Client EXECUTIVE ENGINEER (B&R), HPPWD DIVISION RAMPUR, DISTRICT SHIMLA.

Calculation by SK Design Note No. DN/P-142/002
Cheked by ARK Rev. No R0
Title TRANSVERSE ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF BOX GIRDER
Approved by PK Date 18 July 2024
1.1.2.4.2 2 LANE CLASS - A

Two lane class-A is analysed by using combination of above load cases for 1 lane only in software

1.1.2.4.3 1 LANE 40T BOGGIE (L-TYPE)

Load on Wheel-1 = 100 kN Load on Wheel-2 = 100 kN
Max. load on a wheel = 100 kN Wheel Base width = 860 mm Wheel Gap = 50 mm
Max. tyre pressure = 5.273 kg/cm2 Contact area = 1896.5 cm2 Vehcle width = 2.79 m
Contact width along span = 810 mm Contact width across span = 234.1 mm
Distance between two loads across span = 1.22 m b1 = 0.364 m
Distances between C/C of wheel Across the traffic = 1.93 m
Impact factor = 1.25
Edge Distance = 1.2 m
Initial position of first wheel = 2.13 m
Final Position of first wheel = 4.440 m
Transverse increament = 0.0462 m

Wheel-1 Wheel-2
Load Dist. of P with Dist. of P with
Case Position Nearest beff beff (mod) Impact Position Nearest beff beff (mod) Impact
Support (kN) Support (kN)
1 2.13 0.12 0.51 0.51 246.00 4.06 1.51 2.69 1.95 63.97
2 2.1762 0.07 0.45 0.45 276.13 4.1062 1.56 2.71 1.96 63.64
3 2.2224 0.03 0.40 0.40 314.66 4.1524 1.60 2.73 1.97 63.35
4 2.2686 0.02 0.36 0.36 343.28 4.1986 1.65 2.74 1.98 63.12
5 2.3148 0.06 0.36 0.36 343.28 4.2448 1.69 2.75 1.99 62.94
6 2.361 0.11 0.36 0.36 343.28 4.291 1.66 2.74 1.98 63.08
7 2.4072 0.14 0.36 0.36 343.28 4.3372 1.61 2.73 1.97 63.30
8 2.4534 0.10 0.36 0.36 343.28 4.3834 1.57 2.71 1.97 63.57
9 2.4996 0.05 0.36 0.36 343.28 4.4296 1.52 2.69 1.96 63.89
10 2.5458 0.00 0.36 0.36 343.28 4.4758 1.47 2.67 1.94 64.27
11 2.592 0.04 0.47 0.47 264.78 4.522 1.43 2.64 1.93 64.70
12 2.6382 0.09 0.59 0.59 212.59 4.5682 1.38 2.62 1.92 65.19

Page 6 of 65
Project CONSTRUCTION OF 38.000 METER SPAN BRIDGE OVER KRODA KHAD ON RAMPUR GAURA MASHNOO JEORI ROAD AT RD 35/825.
Consultant: Infrastructure Technologies

Client EXECUTIVE ENGINEER (B&R), HPPWD DIVISION RAMPUR, DISTRICT SHIMLA.

Calculation by SK Design Note No. DN/P-142/002
Cheked by ARK Rev. No R0
Title TRANSVERSE ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF BOX GIRDER
Approved by PK Date 18 July 2024
Wheel-1 Wheel-2
Load Dist. of P with Dist. of P with
Case Position Nearest beff beff (mod) Impact Position Nearest beff beff (mod) Impact
Support (kN) Support (kN)
13 2.6844 0.13 0.70 0.70 178.35 4.6144 1.34 2.58 1.90 65.73
14 2.7306 0.18 0.81 0.81 154.17 4.6606 1.29 2.55 1.88 66.34
15 2.7768 0.23 0.92 0.92 136.22 4.7068 1.24 2.51 1.87 67.02
16 2.823 0.27 1.02 1.02 122.36 4.753 1.20 2.47 1.84 67.76
17 2.8692 0.32 1.12 1.12 111.36 4.7992 1.15 2.43 1.82 68.58
18 2.9154 0.37 1.22 1.22 102.44 4.8454 1.10 2.38 1.80 69.47
19 2.9616 0.41 1.32 1.27 98.61 4.8916 1.06 2.33 1.77 70.45
20 3.0078 0.46 1.41 1.31 95.16 4.9378 1.01 2.28 1.75 71.51
21 3.054 0.50 1.50 1.36 92.05 4.984 0.97 2.22 1.72 72.67
22 3.1002 0.55 1.58 1.40 89.22 5.0302 0.92 2.16 1.69 73.94
23 3.1464 0.60 1.66 1.44 86.66 5.0764 0.87 2.10 1.66 75.32
24 3.1926 0.64 1.74 1.48 84.33 5.1226 0.83 2.03 1.63 76.82
25 3.2388 0.69 1.82 1.52 82.19 5.1688 0.78 1.97 1.59 78.46
26 3.285 0.73 1.90 1.56 80.24 5.215 0.74 1.90 1.56 80.24
27 3.3312 0.78 1.97 1.59 78.46 5.2612 0.69 1.82 1.52 82.19
28 3.3774 0.83 2.03 1.63 76.82 5.3074 0.64 1.74 1.48 84.33
29 3.4236 0.87 2.10 1.66 75.32 5.3536 0.60 1.66 1.44 86.66
30 3.4698 0.92 2.16 1.69 73.94 5.3998 0.55 1.58 1.40 89.22
31 3.516 0.97 2.22 1.72 72.67 5.446 0.50 1.50 1.36 92.05
32 3.5622 1.01 2.28 1.75 71.51 5.4922 0.46 1.41 1.31 95.16
33 3.6084 1.06 2.33 1.77 70.45 5.5384 0.41 1.32 1.27 98.61
34 3.6546 1.10 2.38 1.80 69.47 5.5846 0.37 1.22 1.22 102.44
35 3.7008 1.15 2.43 1.82 68.58 5.6308 0.32 1.12 1.12 111.36
36 3.747 1.20 2.47 1.84 67.76 5.677 0.27 1.02 1.02 122.36
37 3.7932 1.24 2.51 1.87 67.02 5.7232 0.23 0.92 0.92 136.22
38 3.8394 1.29 2.55 1.88 66.34 5.7694 0.18 0.81 0.81 154.17
39 3.8856 1.34 2.58 1.90 65.73 5.8156 0.13 0.70 0.70 178.35
40 3.9318 1.38 2.62 1.92 65.19 5.8618 0.09 0.59 0.59 212.59
41 3.978 1.43 2.64 1.93 64.70 5.908 0.04 0.47 0.47 264.78

Page 7 of 65
Project CONSTRUCTION OF 38.000 METER SPAN BRIDGE OVER KRODA KHAD ON RAMPUR GAURA MASHNOO JEORI ROAD AT RD 35/825.
Consultant: Infrastructure Technologies

Client EXECUTIVE ENGINEER (B&R), HPPWD DIVISION RAMPUR, DISTRICT SHIMLA.

1.1.2.4.4 1 LANE 40T BOGGIE (M-TYPE)

Load on Wheel-1 = 50 kN Load on Wheel-2 = 50 kN

Load on Wheel-3 = 50 kN Load on Wheel-4 = 50 kN
Max. load on a wheel = 50 kN Wheel Base width = 410 mm Wheel Gap = 0 mm
Max. tyre pressure = 5.273 kg/cm2 Contact area = 948.2 cm2 Vehcle width = 2.79 m
Contact width along span = 410 mm Contact width across span = 231 mm
Distance between two loads across span = 1.22 m b1 = 0.361 m
Impact factor = 1.25
Wheel Spacing 1 = 0.795 m Wheel Spacing 2 = 0.79 m
Distances between C/C of first and last wheel = 2.38 m
Edge Distance = 1.2 m
Initial Position of first wheel = 1.905 m
Final position of first wheel = 4.215 m
No of Load generation = 50
Transverse increament = 0.0462 m

Page 8 of 65
Project CONSTRUCTION OF 38.000 METER SPAN BRIDGE OVER KRODA KHAD ON RAMPUR GAURA MASHNOO JEORI ROAD AT RD 35/825.
Consultant: Infrastructure Technologies

Client EXECUTIVE ENGINEER (B&R), HPPWD DIVISION RAMPUR, DISTRICT SHIMLA.

Calculation by SK Design Note No. DN/P-142/002
Cheked by ARK Rev. No R0
Title TRANSVERSE ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF BOX GIRDER
Approved by PK Date 18 July 2024

Wheel-1 Wheel-2 Wheel-3 Wheel-4

Load Dist. of P with Dist. of P with Dist. of P with Dist. of P with
Case Position Nearest beff beff (mod) Impact Position Nearest beff beff (mod) Impact Position Nearest beff beff (mod) Impact Position Nearest beff beff (mod) Impact
Support (kN) Support (kN) Support (kN) Support (kN)
1 1.905 0.35 0.78 0.78 80.62 2.7 0.15 0.74 0.74 84.98 3.49 0.94 2.18 1.70 36.72 4.285 1.67 2.74 1.98 31.55
2 1.9512 0.30 0.72 0.72 86.83 2.7462 0.20 0.84 0.84 74.02 3.5362 0.99 2.24 1.73 36.11 4.3312 1.62 2.73 1.97 31.66
3 1.9974 0.25 0.66 0.66 94.07 2.7924 0.24 0.95 0.95 65.77 3.5824 1.03 2.30 1.76 35.55 4.3774 1.57 2.71 1.97 31.79
4 2.0436 0.21 0.61 0.61 102.63 2.8386 0.29 1.05 1.05 59.35 3.6286 1.08 2.35 1.78 35.03 4.4236 1.53 2.69 1.96 31.95
5 2.0898 0.16 0.55 0.55 112.91 2.8848 0.33 1.15 1.15 54.21 3.6748 1.12 2.40 1.81 34.56 4.4698 1.48 2.67 1.95 32.13
6 2.136 0.11 0.50 0.50 125.48 2.931 0.38 1.25 1.23 50.61 3.721 1.17 2.44 1.83 34.13 4.516 1.43 2.64 1.93 32.34
7 2.1822 0.07 0.44 0.44 141.20 2.9772 0.43 1.34 1.28 48.76 3.7672 1.22 2.48 1.85 33.74 4.5622 1.39 2.62 1.92 32.58
8 2.2284 0.02 0.39 0.39 161.42 3.0234 0.47 1.43 1.33 47.09 3.8134 1.26 2.52 1.87 33.38 4.6084 1.34 2.58 1.90 32.85
9 2.2746 0.02 0.36 0.36 173.00 3.0696 0.52 1.52 1.37 45.58 3.8596 1.31 2.56 1.89 33.06 4.6546 1.30 2.55 1.89 33.16
10 2.3208 0.07 0.36 0.36 173.00 3.1158 0.57 1.61 1.41 44.21 3.9058 1.36 2.59 1.91 32.77 4.7008 1.25 2.51 1.87 33.49
11 2.367 0.12 0.36 0.36 173.00 3.162 0.61 1.69 1.45 42.97 3.952 1.40 2.63 1.92 32.51 4.747 1.20 2.47 1.85 33.86
12 2.4132 0.14 0.36 0.36 173.00 3.2082 0.66 1.77 1.49 41.83 3.9982 1.45 2.65 1.94 32.28 4.7932 1.16 2.43 1.82 34.26
13 2.4594 0.09 0.36 0.36 173.00 3.2544 0.70 1.84 1.53 40.80 4.0444 1.49 2.68 1.95 32.07 4.8394 1.11 2.38 1.80 34.70
14 2.5056 0.04 0.36 0.36 173.00 3.3006 0.75 1.92 1.57 39.85 4.0906 1.54 2.70 1.96 31.90 4.8856 1.06 2.33 1.78 35.19
15 2.5518 0.00 0.37 0.37 170.79 3.3468 0.80 1.99 1.60 38.98 4.1368 1.59 2.72 1.97 31.75 4.9318 1.02 2.28 1.75 35.71
16 2.598 0.05 0.48 0.48 129.01 3.393 0.84 2.05 1.64 38.18 4.183 1.63 2.73 1.98 31.62 4.978 0.97 2.22 1.72 36.29
17 2.6442 0.09 0.60 0.60 104.17 3.4392 0.89 2.12 1.67 37.45 4.2292 1.68 2.75 1.98 31.52 5.0242 0.93 2.17 1.69 36.92
18 2.6904 0.14 0.71 0.71 87.72 3.4854 0.94 2.18 1.70 36.78 4.2754 1.67 2.74 1.98 31.53 5.0704 0.88 2.10 1.66 37.60
19 2.7366 0.19 0.82 0.82 76.04 3.5316 0.98 2.24 1.73 36.17 4.3216 1.63 2.73 1.98 31.63 5.1166 0.83 2.04 1.63 38.34
20 2.7828 0.23 0.93 0.93 67.31 3.5778 1.03 2.29 1.76 35.60 4.3678 1.58 2.72 1.97 31.76 5.1628 0.79 1.97 1.60 39.15
21 2.829 0.28 1.03 1.03 60.56 3.624 1.07 2.34 1.78 35.08 4.414 1.54 2.70 1.96 31.91 5.209 0.74 1.90 1.56 40.04
22 2.8752 0.33 1.13 1.13 55.19 3.6702 1.12 2.39 1.81 34.61 4.4602 1.49 2.68 1.95 32.09 5.2552 0.69 1.83 1.52 41.00
23 2.9214 0.37 1.23 1.22 51.02 3.7164 1.17 2.44 1.83 34.17 4.5064 1.44 2.65 1.94 32.30 5.3014 0.65 1.75 1.49 42.06
24 2.9676 0.42 1.32 1.27 49.13 3.7626 1.21 2.48 1.85 33.78 4.5526 1.40 2.62 1.92 32.53 5.3476 0.60 1.67 1.45 43.22
25 3.0138 0.46 1.42 1.32 47.42 3.8088 1.26 2.52 1.87 33.42 4.5988 1.35 2.59 1.91 32.80 5.3938 0.56 1.59 1.41 44.48
26 3.06 0.51 1.50 1.36 45.88 3.855 1.31 2.56 1.89 33.09 4.645 1.31 2.56 1.89 33.09 5.44 0.51 1.50 1.36 45.88
27 3.1062 0.56 1.59 1.41 44.48 3.9012 1.35 2.59 1.91 32.80 4.6912 1.26 2.52 1.87 33.42 5.4862 0.46 1.42 1.32 47.42
28 3.1524 0.60 1.67 1.45 43.22 3.9474 1.40 2.62 1.92 32.53 4.7374 1.21 2.48 1.85 33.78 5.5324 0.42 1.32 1.27 49.13

Page 9 of 65
Project CONSTRUCTION OF 38.000 METER SPAN BRIDGE OVER KRODA KHAD ON RAMPUR GAURA MASHNOO JEORI ROAD AT RD 35/825.
Consultant: Infrastructure Technologies

Client EXECUTIVE ENGINEER (B&R), HPPWD DIVISION RAMPUR, DISTRICT SHIMLA.

Calculation by SK Design Note No. DN/P-142/002
Cheked by ARK Rev. No R0
Title TRANSVERSE ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF BOX GIRDER
Approved by PK Date 18 July 2024
Wheel-1 Wheel-2 Wheel-3 Wheel-4
Load Dist. of P with Dist. of P with Dist. of P with Dist. of P with
Case Position Nearest beff beff (mod) Impact Position Nearest beff beff (mod) Impact Position Nearest beff beff (mod) Impact Position Nearest beff beff (mod) Impact
Support (kN) Support (kN) Support (kN) Support (kN)
29 3.1986 0.65 1.75 1.49 42.06 3.9936 1.44 2.65 1.94 32.30 4.7836 1.17 2.44 1.83 34.17 5.5786 0.37 1.23 1.22 51.02
30 3.2448 0.69 1.83 1.52 41.00 4.0398 1.49 2.68 1.95 32.09 4.8298 1.12 2.39 1.81 34.61 5.6248 0.33 1.13 1.13 55.19
31 3.291 0.74 1.90 1.56 40.04 4.086 1.54 2.70 1.96 31.91 4.876 1.07 2.34 1.78 35.08 5.671 0.28 1.03 1.03 60.56
32 3.3372 0.79 1.97 1.60 39.15 4.1322 1.58 2.72 1.97 31.76 4.9222 1.03 2.29 1.76 35.60 5.7172 0.23 0.93 0.93 67.31
33 3.3834 0.83 2.04 1.63 38.34 4.1784 1.63 2.73 1.98 31.63 4.9684 0.98 2.24 1.73 36.17 5.7634 0.19 0.82 0.82 76.04
34 3.4296 0.88 2.10 1.66 37.60 4.2246 1.67 2.74 1.98 31.53 5.0146 0.94 2.18 1.70 36.78 5.8096 0.14 0.71 0.71 87.72
35 3.4758 0.93 2.17 1.69 36.92 4.2708 1.68 2.75 1.98 31.52 5.0608 0.89 2.12 1.67 37.45 5.8558 0.09 0.60 0.60 104.17
36 3.522 0.97 2.22 1.72 36.29 4.317 1.63 2.73 1.98 31.62 5.107 0.84 2.05 1.64 38.18 5.902 0.05 0.48 0.48 129.01
37 3.5682 1.02 2.28 1.75 35.71 4.3632 1.59 2.72 1.97 31.75 5.1532 0.80 1.99 1.60 38.98 5.9482 0.00 0.37 0.37 170.79
38 3.6144 1.06 2.33 1.78 35.19 4.4094 1.54 2.70 1.96 31.90 5.1994 0.75 1.92 1.57 39.85 5.9944 0.04 0.36 0.36 173.00
39 3.6606 1.11 2.38 1.80 34.70 4.4556 1.49 2.68 1.95 32.07 5.2456 0.70 1.84 1.53 40.80 6.0406 0.09 0.36 0.36 173.00
40 3.7068 1.16 2.43 1.82 34.26 4.5018 1.45 2.65 1.94 32.28 5.2918 0.66 1.77 1.49 41.83 6.0868 0.14 0.36 0.36 173.00
41 3.753 1.20 2.47 1.85 33.86 4.548 1.40 2.63 1.92 32.51 5.338 0.61 1.69 1.45 42.97 6.133 0.12 0.36 0.36 173.00
42 3.7992 1.25 2.51 1.87 33.49 4.5942 1.36 2.59 1.91 32.77 5.3842 0.57 1.61 1.41 44.21 6.1792 0.07 0.36 0.36 173.00
43 3.8454 1.30 2.55 1.89 33.16 4.6404 1.31 2.56 1.89 33.06 5.4304 0.52 1.52 1.37 45.58 6.2254 0.02 0.36 0.36 173.00
44 3.8916 1.34 2.58 1.90 32.85 4.6866 1.26 2.52 1.87 33.38 5.4766 0.47 1.43 1.33 47.09 6.2716 0.02 0.39 0.39 161.42
45 3.9378 1.39 2.62 1.92 32.58 4.7328 1.22 2.48 1.85 33.74 5.5228 0.43 1.34 1.28 48.76 6.3178 0.07 0.44 0.44 141.20
46 3.984 1.43 2.64 1.93 32.34 4.779 1.17 2.44 1.83 34.13 5.569 0.38 1.25 1.23 50.61 6.364 0.11 0.50 0.50 125.48
47 4.0302 1.48 2.67 1.95 32.13 4.8252 1.12 2.40 1.81 34.56 5.6152 0.33 1.15 1.15 54.21 6.4102 0.16 0.55 0.55 112.91
48 4.0764 1.53 2.69 1.96 31.95 4.8714 1.08 2.35 1.78 35.03 5.6614 0.29 1.05 1.05 59.35 6.4564 0.21 0.61 0.61 102.63
49 4.1226 1.57 2.71 1.97 31.79 4.9176 1.03 2.30 1.76 35.55 5.7076 0.24 0.95 0.95 65.77 6.5026 0.25 0.66 0.66 94.07
50 4.1688 1.62 2.73 1.97 31.66 4.9638 0.99 2.24 1.73 36.11 5.7538 0.20 0.84 0.84 74.02 6.5488 0.30 0.72 0.72 86.83
51 4.215 1.66 2.74 1.98 31.55 5.01 0.94 2.18 1.70 36.72 5.8 0.15 0.74 0.74 84.98 6.595 0.34 0.78 0.78 80.62

Page 10 of 65
Project CONSTRUCTION OF 38.000 METER SPAN BRIDGE OVER KRODA KHAD ON RAMPUR GAURA MASHNOO JEORI ROAD AT RD 35/825.
Consultant: Infrastructure Technologies

Client EXECUTIVE ENGINEER (B&R), HPPWD DIVISION RAMPUR, DISTRICT SHIMLA.

Calculation by SK Design Note No. DN/P-142/002
Cheked by ARK Rev. No R0
Title TRANSVERSE ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF BOX GIRDER
Approved by PK Date 18 July 2024
1.1.2.4.5 1 LANE 40T BOGGIE (N-TYPE)

Load on Wheel-1 = 50 kN Load on Wheel-2 = 50 kN

Load on Wheel-3 = 50 kN Load on Wheel-4 = 50 kN
Max. load on a wheel = 50 kN Wheel Base width = 510 mm Wheel Gap = 50 mm
Max. tyre pressure = 5.273 kg/cm2 Contact area = 948.2 cm2 Vehcle width = 2.79 m
Contact width along span = 460 mm Contact width across span = 206 mm
Distance between two loads across span = 1.22 m b1 = 0.336 m
Impact factor = 1.25
Wheel Spacing = 0.76 m Wheel Spacing 2 = 0.76 m
Distances between C/C of first and last wheel = 2.28 m
Edge Distance = 1.2 m
Initial Position of first wheel = 1.955 m
Final position of first wheel = 4.265 m
No of Load generation = 50
Transverse increament = 0.0462 m

Wheel-1 Wheel-2 Wheel-3 Wheel-4

Page 11 of 65
Project CONSTRUCTION OF 38.000 METER SPAN BRIDGE OVER KRODA KHAD ON RAMPUR GAURA MASHNOO JEORI ROAD AT RD 35/825.
Consultant: Infrastructure Technologies

Client EXECUTIVE ENGINEER (B&R), HPPWD DIVISION RAMPUR, DISTRICT SHIMLA.

Calculation by SK Design Note No. DN/P-142/002
Cheked by ARK Rev. No R0
Title TRANSVERSE ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF BOX GIRDER
Approved by PK Date 18 July 2024
Wheel-1 Wheel-2 Wheel-3 Wheel-4
Load Dist. of P with Dist. of P with Dist. of P with Dist. of P with
Case Position Nearest beff beff (mod) Impact Position Nearest beff beff (mod) Impact Position Nearest beff beff (mod) Impact Position Nearest beff beff (mod) Impact
Support (kN) Support (kN) Support (kN) Support (kN)
13 2.5094 0.04 0.34 0.34 185.94 3.2694 0.72 1.84 1.53 40.81 4.0294 1.48 2.64 1.93 32.34 4.7894 1.16 2.41 1.81 34.46
14 2.5556 0.01 0.35 0.35 178.23 3.3156 0.77 1.91 1.57 39.87 4.0756 1.53 2.67 1.94 32.16 4.8356 1.11 2.36 1.79 34.91
15 2.6018 0.05 0.47 0.47 133.28 3.3618 0.81 1.98 1.60 39.02 4.1218 1.57 2.69 1.95 32.00 4.8818 1.07 2.31 1.77 35.39
16 2.648 0.10 0.58 0.58 106.99 3.408 0.86 2.05 1.63 38.23 4.168 1.62 2.70 1.96 31.86 4.928 1.02 2.26 1.74 35.93
17 2.6942 0.14 0.70 0.70 89.74 3.4542 0.90 2.11 1.67 37.51 4.2142 1.66 2.72 1.97 31.75 4.9742 0.98 2.20 1.71 36.51
18 2.7404 0.19 0.81 0.81 77.57 3.5004 0.95 2.17 1.70 36.85 4.2604 1.69 2.72 1.97 31.70 5.0204 0.93 2.15 1.68 37.14
19 2.7866 0.24 0.91 0.91 68.53 3.5466 1.00 2.23 1.72 36.24 4.3066 1.64 2.71 1.97 31.80 5.0666 0.88 2.08 1.65 37.83
20 2.8328 0.28 1.02 1.02 61.56 3.5928 1.04 2.28 1.75 35.68 4.3528 1.60 2.70 1.96 31.92 5.1128 0.84 2.02 1.62 38.58
21 2.879 0.33 1.12 1.12 56.03 3.639 1.09 2.33 1.78 35.17 4.399 1.55 2.68 1.95 32.07 5.159 0.79 1.95 1.59 39.39
22 2.9252 0.38 1.21 1.21 51.54 3.6852 1.14 2.38 1.80 34.70 4.4452 1.50 2.66 1.94 32.24 5.2052 0.74 1.88 1.55 40.29
23 2.9714 0.42 1.31 1.26 49.47 3.7314 1.18 2.43 1.82 34.27 4.4914 1.46 2.63 1.93 32.44 5.2514 0.70 1.81 1.51 41.26
24 3.0176 0.47 1.40 1.31 47.74 3.7776 1.23 2.47 1.84 33.89 4.5376 1.41 2.61 1.91 32.67 5.2976 0.65 1.73 1.48 42.33
25 3.0638 0.51 1.49 1.35 46.18 3.8238 1.27 2.51 1.86 33.53 4.5838 1.37 2.58 1.90 32.92 5.3438 0.61 1.65 1.44 43.49
26 3.11 0.56 1.57 1.40 44.77 3.87 1.32 2.54 1.88 33.21 4.63 1.32 2.54 1.88 33.21 5.39 0.56 1.57 1.40 44.77
27 3.1562 0.61 1.65 1.44 43.49 3.9162 1.37 2.58 1.90 32.92 4.6762 1.27 2.51 1.86 33.53 5.4362 0.51 1.49 1.35 46.18
28 3.2024 0.65 1.73 1.48 42.33 3.9624 1.41 2.61 1.91 32.67 4.7224 1.23 2.47 1.84 33.89 5.4824 0.47 1.40 1.31 47.74
29 3.2486 0.70 1.81 1.51 41.26 4.0086 1.46 2.63 1.93 32.44 4.7686 1.18 2.43 1.82 34.27 5.5286 0.42 1.31 1.26 49.47
30 3.2948 0.74 1.88 1.55 40.29 4.0548 1.50 2.66 1.94 32.24 4.8148 1.14 2.38 1.80 34.70 5.5748 0.38 1.21 1.21 51.54
31 3.341 0.79 1.95 1.59 39.39 4.101 1.55 2.68 1.95 32.07 4.861 1.09 2.33 1.78 35.17 5.621 0.33 1.12 1.12 56.03
32 3.3872 0.84 2.02 1.62 38.58 4.1472 1.60 2.70 1.96 31.92 4.9072 1.04 2.28 1.75 35.68 5.6672 0.28 1.02 1.02 61.56
33 3.4334 0.88 2.08 1.65 37.83 4.1934 1.64 2.71 1.97 31.80 4.9534 1.00 2.23 1.72 36.24 5.7134 0.24 0.91 0.91 68.53
34 3.4796 0.93 2.15 1.68 37.14 4.2396 1.69 2.72 1.97 31.70 4.9996 0.95 2.17 1.70 36.85 5.7596 0.19 0.81 0.81 77.57
35 3.5258 0.98 2.20 1.71 36.51 4.2858 1.66 2.72 1.97 31.75 5.0458 0.90 2.11 1.67 37.51 5.8058 0.14 0.70 0.70 89.74
36 3.572 1.02 2.26 1.74 35.93 4.332 1.62 2.70 1.96 31.86 5.092 0.86 2.05 1.63 38.23 5.852 0.10 0.58 0.58 106.99
37 3.6182 1.07 2.31 1.77 35.39 4.3782 1.57 2.69 1.95 32.00 5.1382 0.81 1.98 1.60 39.02 5.8982 0.05 0.47 0.47 133.28
38 3.6644 1.11 2.36 1.79 34.91 4.4244 1.53 2.67 1.94 32.16 5.1844 0.77 1.91 1.57 39.87 5.9444 0.01 0.35 0.35 178.23
39 3.7106 1.16 2.41 1.81 34.46 4.4706 1.48 2.64 1.93 32.34 5.2306 0.72 1.84 1.53 40.81 5.9906 0.04 0.34 0.34 185.94
40 3.7568 1.21 2.45 1.84 34.06 4.5168 1.43 2.62 1.92 32.56 5.2768 0.67 1.77 1.49 41.83 6.0368 0.09 0.34 0.34 185.94
41 3.803 1.25 2.49 1.86 33.69 4.563 1.39 2.59 1.91 32.80 5.323 0.63 1.69 1.46 42.95 6.083 0.13 0.34 0.34 185.94

Page 12 of 65
Project CONSTRUCTION OF 38.000 METER SPAN BRIDGE OVER KRODA KHAD ON RAMPUR GAURA MASHNOO JEORI ROAD AT RD 35/825.
Consultant: Infrastructure Technologies

Client EXECUTIVE ENGINEER (B&R), HPPWD DIVISION RAMPUR, DISTRICT SHIMLA.

1.1.2.4.6 1 LANE 70R TRACK

Load on Wheel-1 = 350 kN Load on Wheel-2 = 350 kN

Contact width along span = 840 mm Contact width across span = 4570 mm Vehcle width = 2.9 m
Distance between two loads across span = 30 m b1 = 4.70 m
Impact factor = 1.25
Edge Distance = 1.2 m
Distances between C/C of first and last wheel = 2.06 m
Initial Position of first wheel 2.12
Final position of first wheel 4.320
No of Load generation 50
Transverse increament 0.044

Page 13 of 65
Project CONSTRUCTION OF 38.000 METER SPAN BRIDGE OVER KRODA KHAD ON RAMPUR GAURA MASHNOO JEORI ROAD AT RD 35/825.
Consultant: Infrastructure Technologies

Client EXECUTIVE ENGINEER (B&R), HPPWD DIVISION RAMPUR, DISTRICT SHIMLA.

Calculation by SK Design Note No. DN/P-142/002
Cheked by ARK Rev. No R0
Title TRANSVERSE ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF BOX GIRDER
Approved by PK Date 18 July 2024

Wheel-1 Wheel-2
Load Dist. of P with Dist. of P with
Case Position Nearest beff beff (mod) Impact Position Nearest beff beff (mod) Impact
Support (kN) Support (kN)
1 2.12 0.13 4.86 4.86 90.09 4.18 1.63 7.07 7.07 61.87
2 2.164 0.09 4.80 4.80 91.09 4.224 1.67 7.08 7.08 61.77
3 2.208 0.04 4.75 4.75 92.10 4.268 1.68 7.09 7.09 61.75
4 2.252 0.00 4.70 4.70 93.09 4.312 1.64 7.07 7.07 61.85
5 2.296 0.05 4.70 4.70 93.09 4.356 1.59 7.06 7.06 61.98
6 2.34 0.09 4.70 4.70 93.09 4.4 1.55 7.04 7.04 62.13
7 2.384 0.13 4.70 4.70 93.09 4.444 1.51 7.02 7.02 62.31
8 2.428 0.12 4.70 4.70 93.09 4.488 1.46 7.00 7.00 62.51
9 2.472 0.08 4.70 4.70 93.09 4.532 1.42 6.97 6.97 62.73
10 2.516 0.03 4.70 4.70 93.09 4.576 1.37 6.95 6.95 62.99
11 2.56 0.01 4.73 4.73 92.57 4.62 1.33 6.91 6.91 63.27
12 2.604 0.05 4.84 4.84 90.42 4.664 1.29 6.88 6.88 63.58
13 2.648 0.10 4.95 4.95 88.42 4.708 1.24 6.85 6.85 63.91
14 2.692 0.14 5.06 5.06 86.55 4.752 1.20 6.81 6.81 64.28
15 2.736 0.19 5.16 5.16 84.80 4.796 1.15 6.76 6.76 64.67
16 2.78 0.23 5.26 5.26 83.16 4.84 1.11 6.72 6.72 65.10
17 2.824 0.27 5.36 5.36 81.63 4.884 1.07 6.67 6.67 65.56
18 2.868 0.32 5.46 5.46 80.19 4.928 1.02 6.62 6.62 66.06
19 2.912 0.36 5.55 5.55 78.84 4.972 0.98 6.57 6.57 66.58
20 2.956 0.41 5.64 5.64 77.57 5.016 0.93 6.52 6.52 67.15
21 3 0.45 5.73 5.73 76.38 5.06 0.89 6.46 6.46 67.75
22 3.044 0.49 5.81 5.81 75.26 5.104 0.85 6.40 6.40 68.40
23 3.088 0.54 5.90 5.90 74.21 5.148 0.80 6.33 6.33 69.08
24 3.132 0.58 5.98 5.98 73.22 5.192 0.76 6.27 6.27 69.81
25 3.176 0.63 6.05 6.05 72.29 5.236 0.71 6.20 6.20 70.59
26 3.22 0.67 6.13 6.13 71.41 5.28 0.67 6.13 6.13 71.41
27 3.264 0.71 6.20 6.20 70.59 5.324 0.63 6.05 6.05 72.29
28 3.308 0.76 6.27 6.27 69.81 5.368 0.58 5.98 5.98 73.22

Page 14 of 65
Project CONSTRUCTION OF 38.000 METER SPAN BRIDGE OVER KRODA KHAD ON RAMPUR GAURA MASHNOO JEORI ROAD AT RD 35/825.
Consultant: Infrastructure Technologies

Client EXECUTIVE ENGINEER (B&R), HPPWD DIVISION RAMPUR, DISTRICT SHIMLA.

Calculation by SK Design Note No. DN/P-142/002
Cheked by ARK Rev. No R0
Title TRANSVERSE ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF BOX GIRDER
Approved by PK Date 18 July 2024
Wheel-1 Wheel-2
Load Dist. of P with Dist. of P with
Case Position Nearest beff beff (mod) Impact Position Nearest beff beff (mod) Impact
Support (kN) Support (kN)
29 3.352 0.80 6.33 6.33 69.08 5.412 0.54 5.90 5.90 74.21
30 3.396 0.85 6.40 6.40 68.40 5.456 0.49 5.81 5.81 75.26
31 3.44 0.89 6.46 6.46 67.75 5.5 0.45 5.73 5.73 76.38
32 3.484 0.93 6.52 6.52 67.15 5.544 0.41 5.64 5.64 77.57
33 3.528 0.98 6.57 6.57 66.58 5.588 0.36 5.55 5.55 78.84
34 3.572 1.02 6.62 6.62 66.06 5.632 0.32 5.46 5.46 80.19
35 3.616 1.07 6.67 6.67 65.56 5.676 0.27 5.36 5.36 81.63
36 3.66 1.11 6.72 6.72 65.10 5.72 0.23 5.26 5.26 83.16
37 3.704 1.15 6.76 6.76 64.67 5.764 0.19 5.16 5.16 84.80
38 3.748 1.20 6.81 6.81 64.28 5.808 0.14 5.06 5.06 86.55
39 3.792 1.24 6.85 6.85 63.91 5.852 0.10 4.95 4.95 88.42
40 3.836 1.29 6.88 6.88 63.58 5.896 0.05 4.84 4.84 90.42
41 3.88 1.33 6.91 6.91 63.27 5.94 0.01 4.73 4.73 92.57
42 3.924 1.37 6.95 6.95 62.99 5.984 0.03 4.70 4.70 93.09
43 3.968 1.42 6.97 6.97 62.73 6.028 0.08 4.70 4.70 93.09
44 4.012 1.46 7.00 7.00 62.51 6.072 0.12 4.70 4.70 93.09
45 4.056 1.51 7.02 7.02 62.31 6.116 0.13 4.70 4.70 93.09
46 4.1 1.55 7.04 7.04 62.13 6.16 0.09 4.70 4.70 93.09
47 4.144 1.59 7.06 7.06 61.98 6.204 0.05 4.70 4.70 93.09
48 4.188 1.64 7.07 7.07 61.85 6.248 0.00 4.70 4.70 93.09
49 4.232 1.68 7.09 7.09 61.75 6.292 0.04 4.75 4.75 92.10
50 4.276 1.67 7.08 7.08 61.77 6.336 0.09 4.80 4.80 91.09
51 4.32 1.63 7.07 7.07 61.87 6.38 0.13 4.86 4.86 90.09

Page 15 of 65
Project CONSTRUCTION OF 38.000 METER SPAN BRIDGE OVER KRODA KHAD ON RAMPUR GAURA MASHNOO JEORI ROAD AT RD 35/825.
Consultant: Infrastructure Technologies

Client EXECUTIVE ENGINEER (B&R), HPPWD DIVISION RAMPUR, DISTRICT SHIMLA.

Calculation by SK Design Note No. DN/P-142/002
Cheked by ARK Rev. No R0
Title TRANSVERSE ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF BOX GIRDER
Approved by PK Date 18 July 2024
1.1.2.5 THERMAL LOADS
1.1.2.5.1 OVERALL TEMPERATURE (OT)
As in Longitudinal analysis overall temperature Rise and fall is taken as

Temperature Rise 34 deg

Temperature Fall -34 deg
17.8 10.6
1.1.2.5.2 DIFFERENTIAL TEMPERATURE (TGRAD)
0.15 0.25
H 2.4 m 4 0.7

0.25 0.25
Deck Slab Bottom
Temp Rise 0 0
2.4
h1 0.15 m 0
h2 0.25 m Soffit Slab Top
0.25
h3 0.15 m
0.8
0.15 0.25
Temp Fall
h1 h4 0.25 2.1 6.6
h2 h3 0.25
Temperature Rise Temparature Fall
1.1.2.6 LOAD COMBINATION

ULS BASIC COMBINATION

LC SW SD SDS LL OT TGRAD
Factor Fav 1 1 1 1.5 0.9 0.9
Factor Unfav 1.35 1.35 1.75 1.5 0.9 0.9

SLS RARE COMBINATION SLS QUASI-PERMANENT COMBINATION

LC SW SD SDS LL OT TGRAD LC SW SD SDS LL OT TGRAD
Factor Fav 1 1 1 1 0.6 0.6 Factor Fav 1 1 1 0 0.5 0.5
Factor Unfav 1 1 1.2 1 0.6 0.6 Factor Unfav 1 1 1.2 0 0.5 0.5

Page 16 of 65
Project CONSTRUCTION OF 38.000 METER SPAN BRIDGE OVER KRODA KHAD ON RAMPUR GAURA MASHNOO JEORI ROAD AT RD 35/825.
Consultant: Infrastructure Technologies

Client EXECUTIVE ENGINEER (B&R), HPPWD DIVISION RAMPUR, DISTRICT SHIMLA.

Calculation by SK Design Note No. DN/P-142/002
Cheked by ARK Rev. No R0
Title TRANSVERSE ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF BOX GIRDER
Approved by PK Date 18 July 2024
1.1.3 RESULTS OF ANALYSIS

1.1.3.1 SECTIONS FOR RESULT TABULATION

Analysis Result Tabulation is required at section shown in figure below and danture of moment to be considered are given in table below figure.

Member DECK SLAB WALL SOFFIT SLAB

Design Section S1 S2 S3 S4 S5 S6 S7 S8 S9 S10
Nature of Moment to consider HOG HOG HOG SAG HOG SAG HOG SAG NM PM NM PM HOG SAG HOG SAG HOG SAG
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
Legends
Nature Of Moment RM Result sign Description
HOG -ve Hoging moment for Slabs creating Tension at Top Surface
SAG' +ve Sagging moment for Slabs creating Tension at Bottom Surface
NM -ve Negetice Moment for Wall creating Tension at Outer Face
PM +ve Positive Moment for Wall creating Tension at Inner Face
Shear Envelope result is not required because as per IRC:112 the slab designed by effective width method donot require shear check.

Page 17 of 65
Project CONSTRUCTION OF 38.000 METER SPAN BRIDGE OVER KRODA KHAD ON RAMPUR GAURA MASHNOO JEORI ROAD AT RD 35/825.
Consultant: Infrastructure Technologies

Client EXECUTIVE ENGINEER (B&R), HPPWD DIVISION RAMPUR, DISTRICT SHIMLA.

Calculation by SK Design Note No. DN/P-142/002
Cheked by ARK Rev. No R0
Title TRANSVERSE ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF BOX GIRDER
Approved by PK Date 18 July 2024
1.1.3.2 BM ENVELOPE FOR ULS BASIC COMBINATION

BM Envelope for Minimum Mz (Maximum Hogging moment Slabs and Maximum -ve Moment for walls) for ULS Basic Combination

Page 18 of 65
Project CONSTRUCTION OF 38.000 METER SPAN BRIDGE OVER KRODA KHAD ON RAMPUR GAURA MASHNOO JEORI ROAD AT RD 35/825.
Consultant: Infrastructure Technologies

Client EXECUTIVE ENGINEER (B&R), HPPWD DIVISION RAMPUR, DISTRICT SHIMLA.

Calculation by SK Design Note No. DN/P-142/002
Cheked by ARK Rev. No R0
Title TRANSVERSE ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF BOX GIRDER
Approved by PK Date 18 July 2024

BM Envelope for Maximum Mz (Maximum Sagging moment for Slabs and Maximum +ve Moment for walls) for ULS Basic Combination

Member DECK SLAB WALL SOFFIT SLAB

Design Section S1 S2 S3 S4 S5 S6 S7 S8 S9 S10
Nature of Moment to consider HOG HOG HOG SAG HOG SAG HOG SAG NM PM NM PM HOG SAG HOG SAG HOG SAG
Design Moment 75.97 153.085 117.158 26.931 53.395 40.398 25.839 64.034 72.581 100.032 14.408 28.81 21.204 15.995 13.772 22.469 7.483 25.486

Page 19 of 65
Project CONSTRUCTION OF 38.000 METER SPAN BRIDGE OVER KRODA KHAD ON RAMPUR GAURA MASHNOO JEORI ROAD AT RD 35/825.
Consultant: Infrastructure Technologies

Client EXECUTIVE ENGINEER (B&R), HPPWD DIVISION RAMPUR, DISTRICT SHIMLA.

Calculation by SK Design Note No. DN/P-142/002
Cheked by ARK Rev. No R0
Title TRANSVERSE ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF BOX GIRDER
Approved by PK Date 18 July 2024
1.1.3.3 BM ENVELOPE FOR SLS RARE COMBINATION

BM Envelope for Minimum Mz (Maximum Hogging moment Slabs and Maximum -ve Moment for walls) for SLS Rare Combination

Page 20 of 65
Project CONSTRUCTION OF 38.000 METER SPAN BRIDGE OVER KRODA KHAD ON RAMPUR GAURA MASHNOO JEORI ROAD AT RD 35/825.
Consultant: Infrastructure Technologies

Client EXECUTIVE ENGINEER (B&R), HPPWD DIVISION RAMPUR, DISTRICT SHIMLA.

Calculation by SK Design Note No. DN/P-142/002
Cheked by ARK Rev. No R0
Title TRANSVERSE ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF BOX GIRDER
Approved by PK Date 18 July 2024

BM Envelope for Maximum Mz (Maximum Sagging moment for Slabs and Maximum +ve Moment for walls) for SLS Rare Combination

Member DECK SLAB WALL SOFFIT SLAB

Design Section S1 S2 S3 S4 S5 S6 S7 S8 S9 S10
Nature of Moment to consider HOG HOG HOG SAG HOG SAG HOG SAG NM PM NM PM HOG SAG HOG SAG HOG SAG
Design Moment 52.422 105.334 79.404 13.2 36.139 25.045 17.331 41.901 41.571 68.698 6.835 20.035 14.373 8.988 8.175 15.277 2.941 17.601

Page 21 of 65
Project CONSTRUCTION OF 38.000 METER SPAN BRIDGE OVER KRODA KHAD ON RAMPUR GAURA MASHNOO JEORI ROAD AT RD 35/825.
Consultant: Infrastructure Technologies

Client EXECUTIVE ENGINEER (B&R), HPPWD DIVISION RAMPUR, DISTRICT SHIMLA.

Calculation by SK Design Note No. DN/P-142/002
Cheked by ARK Rev. No R0
Title TRANSVERSE ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF BOX GIRDER
Approved by PK Date 18 July 2024
1.1.3.4 BM ENVELOPE FOR SLS QUASI-PERMANENT COMBINATION

BM Envelope for Minimum Mz (Maximum Hogging moment Slabs and Maximum -ve Moment for walls) for SLS Quasi Permanent Combination

Page 22 of 65
Project CONSTRUCTION OF 38.000 METER SPAN BRIDGE OVER KRODA KHAD ON RAMPUR GAURA MASHNOO JEORI ROAD AT RD 35/825.
Consultant: Infrastructure Technologies

Client EXECUTIVE ENGINEER (B&R), HPPWD DIVISION RAMPUR, DISTRICT SHIMLA.

Calculation by SK Design Note No. DN/P-142/002
Cheked by ARK Rev. No R0
Title TRANSVERSE ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF BOX GIRDER
Approved by PK Date 18 July 2024

BM Envelope for Maximum Mz (Maximum Sagging moment for Slabs and Maximum +ve Moment for walls) for SLS Quasi Permanent Combination

Member DECK SLAB WALL SOFFIT SLAB

Design Section S1 S2 S3 S4 S5 S6 S7 S8 S9 S10
Nature of Moment to consider HOG HOG HOG SAG HOG SAG HOG SAG NM PM NM PM HOG SAG HOG SAG HOG SAG
Design Moment 18.526 34.932 22.926 0 14.176 8.437 10.454 12.234 0 32.891 0 12.126 6.815 1.443 0 8.729 0 11.854

Page 23 of 65
Project CONSTRUCTION OF 38.000 METER SPAN BRIDGE OVER KRODA KHAD ON RAMPUR GAURA MASHNOO JEORI ROAD AT RD 35/825.
Consultant: Infrastructure Technologies

Client EXECUTIVE ENGINEER (B&R), HPPWD DIVISION RAMPUR, DISTRICT SHIMLA.

Calculation by SK Design Note No. DN/P-142/002
Cheked by ARK Rev. No R0
Title TRANSVERSE ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF BOX GIRDER
Approved by PK Date 18 July 2024

1.2 ANALYSIS OF OVERHANG SLAB AT EXPANSION JOINT

1.2.1 STRUCTURAL BEHAVIOUR
Over hang slab behaves as cantilever coming out of end cross girder
Width of slab considered 1m
Length 1.1 m
T\hickness 0.4 m
1.2.2 LOADS
1.2.2.1 SELF WEIGHT (SW)
Self weight (SW) 10 KN/m length Shear 11 per m width Moment 6.05 KN-m per m width
1.2.2.2 SUPERIMPOSED DEAD LOAD OF CRASH BARRIER (SD)
2
Area Of Crossection 0.326 m
Weight per m 8.147694 kN/m Shear 8.962464 per m width Moment 4.929355 KN-m per m width
1.2.2.3 SUPERIMPOSED DEAD LOAD OF SURFACEING (SDS)
Thickness 65 mm
2
Weight per unit area 1.625 kN/m Shear 1.7875 per m width Moment 0.983125 KN-m per m width
1.2.2.4 LIVE LOAD (LL)
1.2.2.4.1 CLASS-A 2 LANE Exp Joint Edge

Weight on each wheel 57 KN

No of wheels comtributing 2
Tyre Dim in Cantilever direction 0.25 m 1.800 overlap 0
Tyre Dim in Transverse direction 0.5 m
dispersed width in Trans Dir b1 0.63 m
beff 1.8 m 1.700 overlap 0.1
Total beff for all loads 3.5 m
Impact Factor 1.5
Hence P with impact 48.85714 KN 1.8 overlap 0
Distance from support 0.975 m
0.63
Moment 47.63571 KN-m
0.25
Cl of Cross Girder
1.1

Page 24 of 65
Project CONSTRUCTION OF 38.000 METER SPAN BRIDGE OVER KRODA KHAD ON RAMPUR GAURA MASHNOO JEORI ROAD AT RD 35/825.
Consultant: Infrastructure Technologies

Client EXECUTIVE ENGINEER (B&R), HPPWD DIVISION RAMPUR, DISTRICT SHIMLA.

Calculation by SK Design Note No. DN/P-142/002
Cheked by ARK Rev. No R0
Title TRANSVERSE ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF BOX GIRDER
Approved by PK Date 18 July 2024

1.2.2.4.2 1 LANE 20T SINGLE AXLE (L-TYPE) Exp Joint Edge

Weight on each wheel 100 KN
No of wheels comtributing 2
Tyre Dim in Cantilever direction 0.2341 m 1.93 overlap 0.239522
Tyre Dim in Transverse direction 0.86 m
0.99
dispersed width in Trans Dir b1 0.99 m
beff 2.169522 m
Total beff for all loads 4.099522 m 0.23413
Impact Factor 1.25
Hence P with impact 60.98272 KN 1.1 Cl of Cross Girder
Distance from support 0.982935 m
Moment 59.94205 KN-m

1.2.2.4.3 1 LANE 20T SINGLE AXLE (M-TYPE) Exp Joint Edge

Weight on each wheel 50 KN

No of wheels comtributing 4
Tyre Dim in Cantilever direction 0.2313 m 0.795 overlap 0.926235
Tyre Dim in Transverse direction 0.41 m
dispersed width in Trans Dir b1 0.54 m
beff 1.721235 m 0.79 overlap 0.931235
Total beff for all loads 4.101235 m
Impact Factor 1.25
Hence P with impact 60.95725 KN 0.795 overlap 0.926235
Distance from support 0.984363 m
0.54
Moment 60.004 KN-m
0.2313
Cl of Cross Girder
1.1

Page 25 of 65
Project CONSTRUCTION OF 38.000 METER SPAN BRIDGE OVER KRODA KHAD ON RAMPUR GAURA MASHNOO JEORI ROAD AT RD 35/825.
Consultant: Infrastructure Technologies

Client EXECUTIVE ENGINEER (B&R), HPPWD DIVISION RAMPUR, DISTRICT SHIMLA.

Calculation by SK Design Note No. DN/P-142/002
Cheked by ARK Rev. No R0
Title TRANSVERSE ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF BOX GIRDER
Approved by PK Date 18 July 2024
1.2.2.4.4 1 LANE 20T SINGLE AXLE (N-TYPE) Exp Joint Edge

Weight on each wheel 50 KN

No of wheels comtributing 4
Tyre Dim in Cantilever direction 0.206 m 0.76 overlap 1.076318
Tyre Dim in Transverse direction 0.510 m
dispersed width in Trans Dir b1 0.64 m
beff 1.836318 m 0.76 overlap 1.076318
Total beff for all loads 4.116 m
Impact Factor 1.25
Hence P with impact 60.73389 KN 0.76 overlap 1.076318
Distance from support 0.996932 m
0.64
Moment 60.548 KN-m
0.2061
Cl of Cross Girder
1.1
1.2.2.4.5 1 LANE 70R TRACK Exp Joint Edge
Weight on each wheel 84 KN Total Vehicle W 700 KN
No of wheels comtributing 1 Length 4.57 m
Tyre Dim in Cantilever direction 1.1000 m 2.06 overlap 0
Tyre Dim in Transverse direction 0.84 m
0.97
dispersed width in Trans Dir b1 0.97 m
beff 1.63 m
Total beff for all loads 1.63 m 1.1
Impact Factor 1.25
Hence P with impact 64.60512 KN 1.1 Cl of Cross Girder
Distance from support 0.55 m
Moment 35.53282 KN-m

Max LL moment 60.548 KN-m Shear 64.60512

Page 26 of 65
Project CONSTRUCTION OF 38.000 METER SPAN BRIDGE OVER KRODA KHAD ON RAMPUR GAURA MASHNOO JEORI ROAD AT RD 35/825.
Consultant: Infrastructure Technologies

Client EXECUTIVE ENGINEER (B&R), HPPWD DIVISION RAMPUR, DISTRICT SHIMLA.

Calculation by SK Design Note No. DN/P-142/002
Cheked by ARK Rev. No R0
Title TRANSVERSE ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF BOX GIRDER
Approved by PK Date 18 July 2024
1.2.2.5 LOAD COMBINATION AND ANALYSIS RESULT

ULS_BC ULS_RARE ULS_QP

Moment SF
LC LF Mom SF LF Mom LF Mom
SW 6.05 11.00 1.35 8.1675 14.85 1 6.05 1 6.05
SD 4.93 8.96 1.35 6.654629 12.09933 1 4.929355 1 4.929355
SDS 0.98 1.79 1.75 1.720469 3.128125 1.2 1.17975 1.2 1.17975
LL 60.55 64.61 1.5 90.82132 96.90768 1 60.54755 0 0
Design Forces 107.3639 126.9851 72.70665 12.15911

1.3 ANALYSIS OF SLAB ADJECENT TO CROSS GIRDER

1.3.1 STRUCTURAL BEHAVIOUR

For loading load within the 45 degree triangle shall contribute. However coservatively any load upto a distance of span /2 shall be assumed to be taken cantilever slab coming out of cross girder
Width of slab considered 1m CL of ECG
Length 1.725 m 12
thickness 0.25 m
45 deg CL Long Gird
1.3.2 LOADS
1.3.2.1 SELF WEIGHT (SW)
Self weight (SW) 6.25 KN/m length ` 3.45 1.725
Self weight Moment 9.298828 KN-m per m width
Shear 10.78125 KN per m width

1.3.2.2 SUPERIMPOSED DEAD LOAD OF CRASH BARRIER (SD) 45 deg CL Long Gird
2
Area Of Crossection 0m
Weight per m 0 kN/m
Moment 0 KN-m per m width
Shear 0 KN per m width

Page 27 of 65
Project CONSTRUCTION OF 38.000 METER SPAN BRIDGE OVER KRODA KHAD ON RAMPUR GAURA MASHNOO JEORI ROAD AT RD 35/825.
Consultant: Infrastructure Technologies

Client EXECUTIVE ENGINEER (B&R), HPPWD DIVISION RAMPUR, DISTRICT SHIMLA.

Calculation by SK Design Note No. DN/P-142/002
Cheked by ARK Rev. No R0
Title TRANSVERSE ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF BOX GIRDER
Approved by PK Date 18 July 2024
1.3.2.3 SUPERIMPOSED DEAD LOAD OF SURFACEING (SDS)
Thickness 65 mm
2
Weight per unit area 1.625 kN/m
Moment 2.417695 KN-m per m width
Shear 2.803125 KN per m width

1.3.2.4 LIVE LOAD (LL)

1.3.2.4.1 CLASS A WHEEL
CL of CG
Weight on each wheel 57 KN
No of wheels comtributing 1 45 deg CL Long Gird
Tyre Dim in Cantilever direction 0.25 m
Tyre Dim in Transverse direction 0.5 m
dispersed width in Trans Dir b1 0.63 m 3.45
0.63
beff 2.55 m
Impact Factor 1.5
Hence P with impact 33.52941 KN
Distance from support 1.6 m 45 deg CL Long Gird
Moment 53.64706 KN-m 0.250

1.725

Page 28 of 65
Project CONSTRUCTION OF 38.000 METER SPAN BRIDGE OVER KRODA KHAD ON RAMPUR GAURA MASHNOO JEORI ROAD AT RD 35/825.
Consultant: Infrastructure Technologies

Client EXECUTIVE ENGINEER (B&R), HPPWD DIVISION RAMPUR, DISTRICT SHIMLA.

Calculation by SK Design Note No. DN/P-142/002
Cheked by ARK Rev. No R0
Title TRANSVERSE ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF BOX GIRDER
Approved by PK Date 18 July 2024
1.3.2.4.2 1 LANE 20T SINGLE AXLE (L-TYPE) WHEEL
CL of CG
Weight on each wheel 100 KN
No of wheels comtributing 1 45 deg CL Long Gird
Tyre Dim in Cantilever direction 0.2341 m
Tyre Dim in Transverse direction 0.8600 m
dispersed width in Trans Dir b1 0.99 m 3.45
0.99
beff 2.919522 m
Impact Factor 1.5 0.234
Hence P with impact 51.37827 KN
Distance from support 1.607935 m 45 deg CL Long Gird
Moment 82.61292 KN-m
1.725

Max LL moment 82.613 KN-m

Max. LL Shear 51.37827 kN

1.3.2.5 LOAD COMBINATION AND ANALYSIS RESULT

ULS_BC ULS_RARE ULS_QP

Moment Shear
LC LF Mom Shear LF Mom LF Mom
SW 9.30 10.78 1.35 12.55342 14.55469 1 9.298828 1 9.298828
SD 0.00 0.00 1.35 0 0 1 0 1 0
SDS 2.42 2.80 1.75 4.230967 4.905469 1.2 2.901234 1.2 2.901234
LL 82.61 51.38 1.5 123.9194 77.06741 1 82.61292 0 0
Design Forces 140.7038 96.52757 94.81299 12.20006

Page 29 of 65
Project CONSTRUCTION OF 38.000 METER SPAN BRIDGE OVER KRODA KHAD ON RAMPUR GAURA MASHNOO JEORI ROAD AT RD 35/825. Consultant: Infrastructure Technologies

Calculation by SK Design Note No. DN/P-142/002

1.4.1 DESIGN SECTIONS

Description Section Id
Box Girder Transverse Sections
0.7 m from Root of Cantilever portion of slab S1
Root of Cantilever portion of slab S2
Section Of Main span portion of Deck slab at root of Haunch S3
Section Of Main span portionof Deck slab at Tip of Haunch S4
Section Of Main span portion of Deck slab at Mid Span S5
Section of Web Wall at Top S6
Section of Web Wall at Bottom S7
Section Of Soffit slab at root of Haunch S8
Section Of Soffit slab at Tip of Haunch S9
Section Of Soffit slab at Mid Span S10
Section in Longitudnal Direction Near Cross Girders
Section of Overhang slab S11
Section of slab in span adjecent to cross Girder S12

Elements Nature Of moment Legend

Hogging Moment Creating Tension at Top Surface HOG
Deck Slab and Soffit Slab
Sagging Moment Creating Tension at BottomSurface SAG
Negetive Moment Creating Tension on outer face NM
Web Wall
Positive Moment Creating Tension on Inner face PM

1.4.2 DIMENSIONS

MEMBER DECK SLAB WEB WALL SOFFIT SLAB Near CG

Design Section S1 S2 S3 S4 S5 S6 S7 S8 S9 S10 S11 S12
Nature of Moment HOG HOG HOG SAG HOG SAG HOG SAG NM PM NM PM HOG SAG HOG SAG HOG SAG HOG HOG
Width of Member (m) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Thk Of Member (mm) 303.30 350.00 441.00 441.00 225.00 225.00 243.80 243.80 300.00 300.00 300.00 300.00 483.00 483.00 250.00 250.00 250.00 250.00 350.00 250.00
Cover 40.00 40.00 40.00 40.00 40.00 40.00 40.00 40.00 40.00 40.00 40.00 40.00 40.00 40.00 40.00 40.00 40.00 40.00 40.00 40.00

Page 30 of 65
Project CONSTRUCTION OF 38.000 METER SPAN BRIDGE OVER KRODA KHAD ON RAMPUR GAURA MASHNOO JEORI ROAD AT RD 35/825. Consultant: Infrastructure Technologies

Calculation by SK Design Note No. DN/P-142/002

1.4.3.1 ULS MOMENT AND AXIAL FORCE

MEMBER DECK SLAB WEB WALL SOFFIT SLAB Near CG
Design Section S1 S2 S3 S4 S5 S6 S7 S8 S9 S10 S11 S12
Nature of Moment HOG HOG HOG SAG HOG SAG HOG SAG NM PM NM PM HOG SAG HOG SAG HOG SAG HOG HOG
MaxM(KN-m) 75.97 153.09 117.16 26.93 53.40 40.40 25.84 64.03 72.58 100.03 14.41 28.81 21.20 16.00 13.77 22.47 7.48 25.49 107.36 140.70
MaxM per m (KN-m/m) 75.97 153.09 117.16 26.93 53.40 40.40 25.84 64.03 72.58 100.03 14.41 28.81 21.20 16.00 13.77 22.47 7.48 25.49 107.36 140.70
Cores.Axial Force Ned (KN) +ve
0.88 0.96 10.23 -33.45 -5.62 25.57 -39.70 22.75 393.16 306.82 404.28 335.42 -29.68 22.77 -26.71 24.45 -26.63 39.97 0.00 0.00
Com -ve Tens
Axial Force Ned per m width
0.88 0.96 10.23 -33.45 -5.62 25.57 -39.70 22.75 393.16 306.82 404.28 335.42 -29.68 22.77 -26.71 24.45 -26.63 39.97 0.00 0.00
(KN/m)

1.4.3.2 ULS SHEAR

MEMBER DECK SLAB WEB WALL SOFFIT SLAB Near CG
Design Section S1 S2 S3 S4 S5 S6 S7 S8 S9 S10 S11 S12
Nature of Moment HOG HOG HOG SAG HOG SAG HOG SAG NM PM NM PM HOG SAG HOG SAG HOG SAG HOG HOG
Max SF (KN) 105.38 115.09 94.99 7.06 85.37 9.03 2.99 21.45 39.44 52.70 39.44 37.18 15.74 12.00 9.43 3.78 0.00 0.00 126.99 96.53
Max SF per m (KN/m) 105.38 115.09 94.99 7.06 85.37 9.03 2.99 21.45 39.44 52.70 39.44 37.18 15.74 12.00 9.43 3.78 0.00 0.00 126.99 96.53
Cores.Axial Force Ned (KN) +ve
0.88 0.96 10.23 -33.45 -5.62 25.57 -39.70 22.75 393.16 306.82 404.28 335.42 -29.68 22.77 -26.71 24.45 -26.63 39.97 0.00 0.00
Com -ve Tension
Axial Force Ned per m width
0.88 0.96 10.23 -33.45 -5.62 25.57 -39.70 22.75 393.16 306.82 404.28 335.42 -29.68 22.77 -26.71 24.45 -26.63 39.97 0.00 0.00
(KN/m)

LL SF (KN) (Including Impact) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Load Factor on LL SF 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50
Factored LL SF (KN) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Factored LL SF per m (KN/m) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

SF Excluding Factored LL SF
105.38 115.09 94.99 7.06 85.37 9.03 2.99 21.45 39.44 52.70 39.44 37.18 15.74 12.00 9.43 3.78 0.00 0.00 126.99 96.53
per m

Page 31 of 65
Project CONSTRUCTION OF 38.000 METER SPAN BRIDGE OVER KRODA KHAD ON RAMPUR GAURA MASHNOO JEORI ROAD AT RD 35/825. Consultant: Infrastructure Technologies

Calculation by SK Design Note No. DN/P-142/002

1.4.4.1 MOMENTS IN SLS RARE COMBINATION

MEMBER DECK SLAB WEB WALL SOFFIT SLAB Near CG
Design Section S1 S2 S3 S4 S5 S6 S7 S8 S9 S10 S11 S12
Nature of Moment HOG HOG HOG SAG HOG SAG HOG SAG NM PM NM PM HOG SAG HOG SAG HOG SAG HOG HOG
Max MRC (KN-m) 52.42 105.33 79.40 13.20 36.14 25.05 17.33 41.90 41.57 68.70 6.84 20.04 14.37 8.99 8.18 15.28 2.94 17.60 72.71 94.81
Max MRC per m (KN-m/m) 52.42 105.33 79.40 13.20 36.14 25.05 17.33 41.90 41.57 68.70 6.84 20.04 14.37 8.99 8.18 15.28 2.94 17.60 72.71 94.81

1.4.4.2 MOMENT & AXIAL FORCE IN SLS QUASI-PERMANENT COMBINATION

MEMBER DECK SLAB WEB WALL SOFFIT SLAB Near CG
Design Section S1 S2 S3 S4 S5 S6 S7 S8 S9 S10 S11 S12
Nature of Moment HOG HOG HOG SAG HOG SAG HOG SAG NM PM NM PM HOG SAG HOG SAG HOG SAG HOG HOG
Max Mqp (KN-m) 18.53 34.93 22.93 0.00 14.18 8.44 10.45 12.23 0.00 32.89 0.00 12.13 6.82 1.44 0.00 8.73 0.00 11.85 12.16 12.20
Max Mqp per m (KN-m/m) 18.53 34.93 22.93 0.00 14.18 8.44 10.45 12.23 0.00 32.89 0.00 12.13 6.82 1.44 0.00 8.73 0.00 11.85 12.16 12.20
Cores.Axial Force Ned (KN) +ve
0.17 0.23 -4.22 -11.21 -6.91 -13.92 -6.92 -14.05 44.58 45.81 55.70 56.92 11.73 4.82 14.02 7.01 14.02 7.01 0.00 0.00
Com -ve Tens
Axial Force Ned per m width
0.17 0.23 -4.22 -11.21 -6.91 -13.92 -6.92 -14.05 44.58 45.81 55.70 56.92 11.73 4.82 14.02 7.01 14.02 7.01 0.00 0.00
(KN/m)

1.4.5 MATERIAL DATA

1.4.5.1 CONCRETE

Grade of Concrete (Standard Concrete) = M40 IRC:112 Cl 6.4.1

Characteristic Cube Strength (28 days) f ck = 40 Mpa IRC:112 Table 6.5
Coefficient for Stress Block α = 0.67 IRC:112-Cl 6.4.2.8

Partial safety factor for Material

γm = 1.5 IRC:112-Cl 6.4.2.8
(Basic and seismic)

Design value of concrete

f cd = 17.867 Mpa IRC:112-Cl 6.4.2.8
compressive strength
Rectangular Stress Block Strength Factor η = 1.0 IRC:112-CL A2.9(2)
Rectangular Stress Block Shape Factor λ = 0.8 IRC:112-CL A2.9(2)

Page 32 of 65
Project CONSTRUCTION OF 38.000 METER SPAN BRIDGE OVER KRODA KHAD ON RAMPUR GAURA MASHNOO JEORI ROAD AT RD 35/825. Consultant: Infrastructure Technologies

Calculation by SK Design Note No. DN/P-142/002

Client EXECUTIVE ENGINEER (B&R), HPPWD DIVISION RAMPUR, DISTRICT SHIMLA.
Cheked by ARK Rev. No R0
Title TRANSVERSE ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF BOX GIRDER Approved by PK Date 18 July 2024
β=λ/2 = 0.4
f av =η.λ.f cd = 14.293 Mpa
Mean tensile strength of concrete fctm = 3.000 Mpa IRC:112 Table 6.5
Secent Modulus of Elasticity of Concrete E cm 33000 Mpa IRC:112 Table 6.5
= 33 Gpa
Ultimate Strain in Concrete for Rectangular Stress block ε cu3 = 0.0035 IRC:112 Table 6.5
1.4.5.2 STEEL

Minimum Yeild Stress/0.2% proof stress f yk = 500 Mpa IRC:112 Table 18.1
Modulus of Elasticity of Steel Es 200000 Mpa IRC:112 Cl 6.2.2
= 200 Gpa
Partial factor of safety for basic and seismic γs = 1.150 IRC-112 Fig 6.3 (Note)
Clear Cover = 40.0 mm
1.4.6 DESIGN OF BOX COMPONENTS FOR ULS COMBINATION
2 2
Max Tortional reinforcement required in Soffir and top slab between web = 1.41 cm = 141 mm
2
Torsional reinforcement Req on each face of top and soffit slab A tor = 70.5 mm
1.4.6.1 REINFORCEMENT REQUIRED FOR DIRECT TENSION IF PRESENT
MEMBER DECK SLAB WEB WALL SOFFIT SLAB Near CG
Design Section S1 S2 S3 S4 S5 S6 S7 S8 S9 S10 S11 S12
Nature of Moment HOG HOG HOG SAG HOG SAG HOG SAG NM PM NM PM HOG SAG HOG SAG HOG SAG HOG HOG

Design Tension KN per m width 0.00 0.00 0.00 33.45 5.62 0.00 39.70 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 29.68 0.00 26.71 0.00 26.63 0.00 0.00 0.00

Width (mm) 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000
Reinforcement Req for Tension
0.00 0.00 0.00 76.93 12.94 0.00 91.31 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 68.26 0.00 61.44 0.00 61.26 0.00 0.00 0.00
At (mm2)

Torsional reinforcement Req Ator 70.50 70.50 70.50 70.50 70.50 70.50 70.50 70.50 70.50 70.50 70.50 70.50 70.50 70.50 70.50 70.50 70.50 70.50 0.00 0.00

Reinf. Req for Other Face At/2

70.50 70.50 70.50 108.96 76.97 70.50 116.16 70.50 70.50 70.50 70.50 70.50 104.63 70.50 101.22 70.50 101.13 70.50 0.00 0.00
+ A tor (mm2)
dia of Bar (mm) 12 12 12 16 12 16 12 16 20 16 20 16 12 12 12 12 12 12 0 0
Spacing (mm) 200 200 100 200 100 200 100 200 200 200 200 200 100 100 100 100 100 100 0 0
dia of Bar (mm) 0 0 0 16 0 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Spacing (mm) 0 0 0 200 0 200 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
As Provided.Long (mm^2) 565 565 1131 2011 1131 2011 1131 1005 1571 1005 1571 1005 1131 1131 1131 1131 1131 1131 0 0
Check on As provided Ok Ok Ok Ok Ok Ok Ok Ok Ok Ok Ok Ok Ok Ok Ok Ok Ok Ok Ok Ok

Page 33 of 65
Project CONSTRUCTION OF 38.000 METER SPAN BRIDGE OVER KRODA KHAD ON RAMPUR GAURA MASHNOO JEORI ROAD AT RD 35/825. Consultant: Infrastructure Technologies

Calculation by SK Design Note No. DN/P-142/002

Client EXECUTIVE ENGINEER (B&R), HPPWD DIVISION RAMPUR, DISTRICT SHIMLA.
Cheked by ARK Rev. No R0
Title TRANSVERSE ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF BOX GIRDER Approved by PK Date 18 July 2024

1.4.6.2 REINFORCEMENT REQUIRED FOR BENDING MOMENT

MEMBER DECK SLAB WEB WALL SOFFIT SLAB Near CG
Design Section S1 S2 S3 S4 S5 S6 S7 S8 S9 S10 S11 S12
Nature of Moment HOG HOG HOG SAG HOG SAG HOG SAG NM PM NM PM HOG SAG HOG SAG HOG SAG HOG HOG
Design Moment (M) per m Width
(KN-m/m) 75.97 153.09 117.16 26.93 53.40 40.40 25.84 64.03 72.58 100.03 14.41 28.81 21.20 16.00 13.77 22.47 7.48 25.49 107.36 140.70

Width of comp. zone-b / width of

1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000
Tens. Zone bt (mm)

CDG of Reinforcement From

48.00 49.22 48.00 46.00 48.00 46.00 48.00 46.00 48.00 50.00 48.00 50.00 46.00 46.00 46.00 46.00 46.00 46.00 48.94 48.94
Tension Face
Effective Depth d (mm) 255.30 300.78 393.00 395.00 177.00 179.00 195.80 197.80 252.00 250.00 252.00 250.00 437.00 437.00 204.00 204.00 204.00 204.00 301.06 201.06
Kav = M / (bd2f av) ) 0.08 0.12 0.05 0.01 0.12 0.09 0.05 0.11 0.08 0.11 0.02 0.03 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.04 0.01 0.04 0.08 0.24
x= (1-sqrt(1-4βKav))/(2*β)*d
21.55 37.48 21.32 4.79 22.22 16.39 9.41 23.79 20.84 29.37 4.03 8.17 3.41 2.57 4.77 7.83 2.58 8.90 25.84 54.97
(mm)
x/d 0.08 0.12 0.05 0.01 0.13 0.09 0.05 0.12 0.08 0.12 0.02 0.03 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.04 0.01 0.04 0.09 0.27

x/d lim = 1/( f yk / (γsEsεcu3)+1) 0.62 0.62 0.62 0.62 0.62 0.62 0.62 0.62 0.62 0.62 0.62 0.62 0.62 0.62 0.62 0.62 0.62 0.62 0.62 0.62

Chk for x/d < x/d.lim to ensure

OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK
that Steel Yeilds
Lever Arm z=d - βx (mm) 246.68 285.79 384.47 393.08 168.11 172.44 192.03 188.28 243.66 238.25 250.39 246.73 435.64 435.97 202.09 200.87 202.97 200.44 290.72 179.07

As required.long =(Mγm)/(f ykZ) +

778.8 1302.5 771.4 266.5 807.5 609.3 425.6 852.7 755.6 1036.2 202.8 339.1 216.6 154.9 258.0 327.8 185.9 362.9 849.4 1807.2
At + Ator (mm^2)

dia of Bar (mm) 16 16 16 12 16 12 16 12 16 20 16 20 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12

Spacing (mm) 200 200 200 100 200 100 200 100 200 200 200 200 100 100 100 100 100 100 200 200
dia of Bar (mm) 0 20 16 0 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 20
Spacing (mm) 0 200 200 0 200 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 200 200
As Provided.Long (mm^2) 1005 2576 2011 1131 2011 1131 1005 1131 1005 1571 1005 1571 1131 1131 1131 1131 1131 1131 2136 2136
Check on As provided Ok Ok Ok Ok Ok Ok Ok Ok Ok Ok Ok Ok Ok Ok Ok Ok Ok Ok Ok Ok

Page 34 of 65
Project CONSTRUCTION OF 38.000 METER SPAN BRIDGE OVER KRODA KHAD ON RAMPUR GAURA MASHNOO JEORI ROAD AT RD 35/825. Consultant: Infrastructure Technologies

Calculation by SK Design Note No. DN/P-142/002

Client EXECUTIVE ENGINEER (B&R), HPPWD DIVISION RAMPUR, DISTRICT SHIMLA.
Cheked by ARK Rev. No R0
Title TRANSVERSE ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF BOX GIRDER Approved by PK Date 18 July 2024
1.4.6.3 CHECK FOR MIN. & MAX. LIMITS OF REINFORCEMENT
MEMBER DECK SLAB WEB WALL SOFFIT SLAB Near CG
Design Section S1 S2 S3 S4 S5 S6 S7 S8 S9 S10 S11 S12
Nature of Moment HOG HOG HOG SAG HOG SAG HOG SAG NM PM NM PM HOG SAG HOG SAG HOG SAG HOG HOG
AS.min1=0.26 (f ctm / f yk) bt d
398.27 469.22 613.08 616.20 276.12 279.24 305.45 308.57 393.12 390.00 393.12 390.00 681.72 681.72 318.24 318.24 318.24 318.24 469.65 313.65
(mm^2) IRC:112-CL 16.5.1.1 (1)
AS.min2=0.0013 bt d (mm^2) 331.89 391.01 510.90 513.50 230.10 232.70 254.54 257.14 327.60 325.00 327.60 325.00 568.10 568.10 265.20 265.20 265.20 265.20 391.38 261.38 IRC:112-CL 16.5.1.1 (1)
AS.min = max(AS.min1, AS.min2)
398.27 469.22 613.08 616.20 276.12 279.24 305.45 308.57 393.12 390.00 393.12 390.00 681.72 681.72 318.24 318.24 318.24 318.24 469.65 313.65
(mm^2) IRC:112-CL 16.5.1.1 (1)
Cross-sectional Area of
Concrete Ac (mm^2) 303300 350000 441000 441000 225000 225000 243800 243800 300000 300000 300000 300000 483000 483000 250000 250000 250000 250000 350000 250000
As max tension rein =0.025 Ac
7583 8750 11025 11025 5625 5625 6095 6095 7500 7500 7500 7500 12075 12075 6250 6250 6250 6250 8750 6250
(mm^2) IRC:112-CL 16.5.1.1 (2)
As Provided.Long (mm^2) 1005 2576 2011 1131 2011 1131 1005 1131 1005 1571 1005 1571 1131 1131 1131 1131 1131 1131 2136.3 2136.3
Check on As provided Ok Ok Ok Ok Ok Ok Ok Ok Ok Ok Ok Ok Ok Ok Ok Ok Ok Ok Ok Ok

1.4.6.4 DISTRIBUTION RREINFORCEMENT CALCULATION

MEMBER DECK SLAB WEB WALL SOFFIT SLAB Near CG
Design Section S1 S2 S3 S4 S5 S6 S7 S8 S9 S10 S11 S12
Nature of Moment HOG HOG HOG SAG HOG SAG HOG SAG NM PM NM PM HOG SAG HOG SAG HOG SAG HOG HOG
As required.Trans =20% of As
201.06 515.22 402.12 226.19 402.12 226.19 201.06 226.19 201.06 314.16 201.06 314.16 226.19 226.19 226.19 226.19 226.19 226.19 427.26 427.26
Provided.Long (mm^2) IRC:112-CL 16.6.1.1 (3)
dia of Bar (mm) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12
Spacing (mm) 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200
As Provided.Long (mm^2) 565 565 565 565 565 565 565 565 565 565 565 565 565 565 565 565 565 565 565.49 565.49
Check on As provided Ok Ok Ok Ok Ok Ok Ok Ok Ok Ok Ok Ok Ok Ok Ok Ok Ok Ok Ok Ok

Page 35 of 65
Project CONSTRUCTION OF 38.000 METER SPAN BRIDGE OVER KRODA KHAD ON RAMPUR GAURA MASHNOO JEORI ROAD AT RD 35/825. Consultant: Infrastructure Technologies

Calculation by SK Design Note No. DN/P-142/002

Additional As in long Dir Not Req Not Req Not Req Not Req Not Req Not Req Not Req Not Req Not Req Not Req Not Req Not Req Not Req Not Req Not Req Not Req Not Req Not Req Not Req Not Req

dia of Bar (mm) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Spacing (mm) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
As Provided 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Check on As provided Ok Ok Ok Ok Ok Ok Ok Ok Ok Ok Ok Ok Ok Ok Ok Ok Ok Ok Ok Ok
As alredy Provided in
565 565 565 565 565 565 565 565 565 565 565 565 565 565 565 565 565 565 565.49 565.49
Transverse Direction

Additional As in Trans Dir Not Req Not Req Not Req Not Req Not Req Not Req Not Req Not Req Not Req Not Req Not Req Not Req Not Req Not Req Not Req Not Req Not Req Not Req Not Req Not Req

dia of Bar (mm) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Spacing (mm) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
As Provided 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Check on As provided Ok Ok Ok Ok Ok Ok Ok Ok Ok Ok Ok Ok Ok Ok Ok Ok Ok Ok Ok Ok

1.4.6.6 CHECK FOR MAX. LIMITS FOR TOTAL REINFORCEMENT

MEMBER DECK SLAB WEB WALL SOFFIT SLAB Near CG
Design Section S1 S2 S3 S4 S5 S6 S7 S8 S9 S10 S11 S12
Nature of Moment HOG HOG HOG SAG HOG SAG HOG SAG NM PM NM PM HOG SAG HOG SAG HOG SAG HOG HOG
As max Long rein =0.04 Ac
12132 14000 17640 17640 9000 9000 9752 9752 12000 12000 12000 12000 19320 19320 10000 10000 10000 10000 14000 10000
(mm^2) IRC:112-CL 16.5.1.1 (2)
As Provided.Long (mm^2) 1005 2576 2011 1131 2011 1131 1005 1131 1005 1571 1005 1571 1131 1131 1131 1131 1131 1131 2136.3 2136.3
Check on As provided Ok Ok Ok Ok Ok Ok Ok Ok Ok Ok Ok Ok Ok Ok Ok Ok Ok Ok Ok Ok

Page 36 of 65
Project CONSTRUCTION OF 38.000 METER SPAN BRIDGE OVER KRODA KHAD ON RAMPUR GAURA MASHNOO JEORI ROAD AT RD 35/825. Consultant: Infrastructure Technologies

Calculation by SK Design Note No. DN/P-142/002

Client EXECUTIVE ENGINEER (B&R), HPPWD DIVISION RAMPUR, DISTRICT SHIMLA.
Cheked by ARK Rev. No R0
Title TRANSVERSE ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF BOX GIRDER Approved by PK Date 18 July 2024
1.4.7 ULS SHEAR CHECK
ULS Shear Check at effective depth d as per clause IRC:112 Clause 10.2.3(1) and Check is carried out as per Clause RC:112 Clause 10.3
MEMBER DECK SLAB WEB WALL SOFFIT SLAB Near CG
Design Section S1 S2 S3 S4 S5 S6 S7 S8 S9 S10 S11 S12
Nature of Moment HOG HOG HOG SAG HOG SAG HOG SAG NM PM NM PM HOG SAG HOG SAG HOG SAG HOG HOG
SF Excluding Factored LL SF
105.38 115.09 94.99 7.06 85.37 9.03 2.99 21.45 39.44 52.70 39.44 37.18 15.74 12.00 9.43 3.78 0.00 0.00 126.99 96.53
per m

Factored LL SF per m (KN/m) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Total VEd calculated without Red

105.38 115.09 94.99 7.06 85.37 9.03 2.99 21.45 39.44 52.70 39.44 37.18 15.74 12.00 9.43 3.78 0.00 0.00 126.99 96.53
factor β (KN/m)
Strength reduction Factor for
concrete cracked in Shear 0.523 0.523 0.523 0.523 0.523 0.523 0.523 0.523 0.523 0.523 0.523 0.523 0.523 0.523 0.523 0.523 0.523 0.523 0.523 0.523 IRC:112-CL 10.3.2(5) Eq 10.6
ν =0.6(1-f ck/310)
Limit For Application of Red to
1191.8 1404.2 1834.7 1844.0 826.3 835.6 914.1 923.4 1176.4 1167.1 1176.4 1167.1 2040.1 2040.1 952.4 952.4 952.4 952.4 1405.5 938.6
LL SF 0.5bwdνf cd

Chk Limit For Application of

Reduction to LL SF APP APP APP APP APP APP APP APP APP APP APP APP APP APP APP APP APP APP APP APP IRC:112-CL 10.3.2(5) Eq 10.5
Ved<=0.5bwdνfcd

αv is d and is within 0.5d to 2d 255.30 300.78 393.00 395.00 177.00 179.00 195.80 197.80 252.00 250.00 252.00 250.00 437.00 437.00 204.00 204.00 204.00 204.00 301.06 201.06 IRC:112-CL 10.3.2(5)

if Limit for Application is APP

0.500 0.500 0.500 0.500 0.500 0.500 0.500 0.500 0.500 0.500 0.500 0.500 0.500 0.500 0.500 0.500 0.500 0.500 0.500 0.500
then β=αv/2d else if NA then β=1

Design Shear Force per m VEd

(KN/m)
105.38 115.09 94.99 7.06 85.37 9.03 2.99 21.45 39.44 52.70 39.44 37.18 15.74 12.00 9.43 3.78 0.00 0.00 126.99 96.53 IRC:112-CL 10.3.2 (5)
=SF Excluding Factored LL
SF + β*Factored LL SF

Applied Longitudinal Force Ned

0.88 0.96 10.23 -33.45 -5.62 25.57 -39.70 22.75 393.16 306.82 404.28 335.42 -29.68 22.77 -26.71 24.45 -26.63 39.97 0.00 0.00
(KN/m)
Min Breadth bw (mm) 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000
Effective Depth d (mm) 255.3 300.8 393.0 395.0 177.0 179.0 195.8 197.8 252.0 250.0 252.0 250.0 437.0 437.0 204.0 204.0 204.0 204.0 301.1 201.1
1+Sqrt( 200/d) 1.885 1.815 1.713 1.712 2.063 2.057 2.011 2.006 1.891 1.894 1.891 1.894 1.677 1.677 1.990 1.990 1.990 1.990 1.815 1.997

Page 37 of 65
Project CONSTRUCTION OF 38.000 METER SPAN BRIDGE OVER KRODA KHAD ON RAMPUR GAURA MASHNOO JEORI ROAD AT RD 35/825. Consultant: Infrastructure Technologies

Calculation by SK Design Note No. DN/P-142/002

Client EXECUTIVE ENGINEER (B&R), HPPWD DIVISION RAMPUR, DISTRICT SHIMLA.
Cheked by ARK Rev. No R0
Title TRANSVERSE ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF BOX GIRDER Approved by PK Date 18 July 2024
MEMBER DECK SLAB WEB WALL SOFFIT SLAB Near CG
Design Section S1 S2 S3 S4 S5 S6 S7 S8 S9 S10 S11 S12
Nature of Moment HOG HOG HOG SAG HOG SAG HOG SAG NM PM NM PM HOG SAG HOG SAG HOG SAG HOG HOG
Coefficent K=min(1+Sqrt(
1.885 1.815 1.713 1.712 2.000 2.000 2.000 2.000 1.891 1.894 1.891 1.894 1.677 1.677 1.990 1.990 1.990 1.990 1.815 1.997
200/d), 2.0) IRC:112-CL 10.3.2 Eq 10.2
νmin=0.031 K(3/2) fck(1/2) 0.51 0.48 0.44 0.44 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.51 0.51 0.51 0.51 0.43 0.43 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.48 0.55 IRC:112-CL 10.3.2 Eq 10.3
Cross-sectional Area of
303300 350000 441000 441000 225000 225000 243800 243800 300000 300000 300000 300000 483000 483000 250000 250000 250000 250000 350000 250000
Concrete Ac (mm^2)
Ned / Ac 0.003 0.003 0.023 0.000 0.000 0.114 0.000 0.093 1.311 1.023 1.348 1.118 0.000 0.047 0.000 0.098 0.000 0.160 0.000 0.000
0.2 f cd 3.573 3.573 3.573 3.573 3.573 3.573 3.573 3.573 3.573 3.573 3.573 3.573 3.573 3.573 3.573 3.573 3.573 3.573 3.573 3.573
Compressive stress in con σcp =
0.003 0.003 0.023 0.000 0.000 0.114 0.000 0.093 1.311 1.023 1.348 1.118 0.000 0.047 0.000 0.098 0.000 0.160 0.000 0.000
min (Ned / Ac , 0.2 f cd) IRC:112-CL 10.3.2
Area of tensile reinforcement Asl
1005 2576 2011 1131 2011 1131 1005 1131 1005 1571 1005 1571 1131 1131 1131 1131 1131 1131 2136 2136
(mm^2)
Asl / (bwd) 0.004 0.009 0.005 0.003 0.011 0.006 0.005 0.006 0.004 0.006 0.004 0.006 0.003 0.003 0.006 0.006 0.006 0.006 0.007 0.011
ρ1 = min( Asl / (bwd) , 0.02 ) 0.004 0.009 0.005 0.003 0.011 0.006 0.005 0.006 0.004 0.006 0.004 0.006 0.003 0.003 0.006 0.006 0.006 0.006 0.007 0.011 IRC:112-CL 10.3.2
VRd.c1 = (vmin + 0.15σcp)bwd 129.7 144.4 174.2 173.4 98.2 102.3 108.6 112.5 178.0 166.2 179.4 169.7 186.0 189.1 112.3 115.3 112.3 117.2 144.3 111.3 IRC:112-CL 10.3.2 Eq 10.1
VRd.c2 = (0.12 K(80 ρ1.f ck)0.33+
133.4 195.5 204.6 168.5 139.0 118.9 118.4 126.7 182.0 191.4 183.4 194.9 176.6 179.7 125.9 128.8 125.9 130.7 183.8 154.3
0.15σcp)bwd IRC:112-CL 10.3.2 Eq 10.1
design Shear Resistance VRd.c =
133.4 195.5 204.6 173.4 139.0 118.9 118.4 126.7 182.0 191.4 183.4 194.9 186.0 189.1 125.9 128.8 125.9 130.7 183.8 154.3
Max (VRd.c1 , VRd.c2) IRC:112-CL 10.3.2 Eq 10.1
Shear Reinforcement
Requirement
Not req Not req Not req Not req Not req Not req Not req Not req Not req Not req Not req Not req Not req Not req Not req Not req Not req Not req Not req Not req IRC:112-CL 10.3.2 (1)
if VRd.c >= Ved then "Not Req"
else "Req"

Page 38 of 65
Project CONSTRUCTION OF 38.000 METER SPAN BRIDGE OVER KRODA KHAD ON RAMPUR GAURA MASHNOO JEORI ROAD AT RD 35/825. Consultant: Infrastructure Technologies

Calculation by SK Design Note No. DN/P-142/002

SLS Stress check has to be carried out for service life as per IRC:112 clause 12.1(1). Hence stress is checked at bridge opening as well as 70yrs when all of creep has taken place

1.4.8.1 SLS STRESS CHECK AT BRIDGE OPENING

1. Check whether concrete is Cracked or Uncracked in Rare Combination

MEMBER DECK SLAB WEB WALL SOFFIT SLAB Near CG
Design Section S1 S2 S3 S4 S5 S6 S7 S8 S9 S10 S11 S12
Nature of Moment HOG HOG HOG SAG HOG SAG HOG SAG NM PM NM PM HOG SAG HOG SAG HOG SAG HOG HOG
Design Moment (MRC) per m
52.42 105.33 79.40 13.20 36.14 25.05 17.33 41.90 41.57 68.70 6.84 20.04 14.37 8.99 8.18 15.28 2.94 17.60 72.71 94.81
Width (KN-m/m)
b 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000
D 303.30 350.00 441.00 441.00 225.00 225.00 243.80 243.80 300.00 300.00 300.00 300.00 483.00 483.00 250.00 250.00 250.00 250.00 350.00 250.00
Uncracked I = (bD^3) / 12
2E+09 4E+09 7E+09 7E+09 9E+08 9E+08 1E+09 1E+09 2E+09 2E+09 2E+09 2E+09 9E+09 9E+09 1E+09 1E+09 1E+09 1E+09 4E+09 1E+09
(mm^4)
Y=Ytop = Ybot = D/2 151.65 175.00 220.50 220.50 112.50 112.50 121.90 121.90 150.00 150.00 150.00 150.00 241.50 241.50 125.00 125.00 125.00 125.00 175.00 125.00
σtop = σbot = MRC *Y/I 3.419 5.159 2.450 0.407 4.283 2.968 1.749 4.230 2.771 4.580 0.456 1.336 0.370 0.231 0.785 1.467 0.282 1.690 3.561 9.102

Mean Flexural tensile Strength

f ctm.fl = max( (1.6-h/1000)f ctm , 3.890 3.750 3.477 3.477 4.125 4.125 4.069 4.069 3.900 3.900 3.900 3.900 3.351 3.351 4.050 4.050 4.050 4.050 3.750 4.050 IRC:112-CL 6.4.2.3 (3) Eq 6.6
f ctm )

if σbot > f ctm.fl then "Crack" else Un- Un- Un- Un- Un- Un- Un- Un- Un- Un- Un- Un- Un- Un- Un-
Crack Crack Crack Crack Crack IRC:112-CL 12.1(2)
"Un-crack" Crack Crack Crack Crack Crack Crack Crack Crack Crack Crack Crack Crack Crack Crack Crack
Allowable Compressive Stress =
19.20 19.20 19.20 19.20 19.20 19.20 19.20 19.20 19.20 19.20 19.20 19.20 19.20 19.20 19.20 19.20 19.20 19.20 19.20 19.20 IRC:112-CL 12.2.1(1)
0.48 f ck

Chk on Comp stress if section is

Uncracked else blank(-) and
OK - OK OK - OK OK - OK - OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK -
Chk for Cracked section to
follow

Page 39 of 65
Project CONSTRUCTION OF 38.000 METER SPAN BRIDGE OVER KRODA KHAD ON RAMPUR GAURA MASHNOO JEORI ROAD AT RD 35/825. Consultant: Infrastructure Technologies

Calculation by SK Design Note No. DN/P-142/002

Client EXECUTIVE ENGINEER (B&R), HPPWD DIVISION RAMPUR, DISTRICT SHIMLA.
Cheked by ARK Rev. No R0
Title TRANSVERSE ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF BOX GIRDER Approved by PK Date 18 July 2024
2. Cracked Section Stress Check at 0 days after construction
MEMBER DECK SLAB WEB WALL SOFFIT SLAB Near CG
Design Section S1 S2 S3 S4 S5 S6 S7 S8 S9 S10 S11 S12
Nature of Moment HOG HOG HOG SAG HOG SAG HOG SAG NM PM NM PM HOG SAG HOG SAG HOG SAG HOG HOG

Effective Modulus of Elasticity of

concrete Ec,eff = short term 33000 33000 33000 33000 33000 33000 33000 33000 33000 33000 33000 33000 33000 33000 33000 33000 33000 33000 33000 33000
Modulu s= Ecm (Mpa)

Modulus of Elasticity of Steel Es

200000 200000 200000 200000 200000 200000 200000 200000 200000 200000 200000 200000 200000 200000 200000 200000 200000 200000 200000 200000
(Mpa)
Area of Steel As (mm^2) 1005 2576 2011 1131 2011 1131 1005 1131 1005 1571 1005 1571 1131 1131 1131 1131 1131 1131 2136 2136
b 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000
d 255.30 300.78 393.00 395.00 177.00 179.00 195.80 197.80 252.00 250.00 252.00 250.00 437.00 437.00 204.00 204.00 204.00 204.00 301.06 201.06
Depth of Concrete in
Compression(mm)
50.015 82.549 86.437 67.051 54.614 43.154 43.132 45.668 49.656 60.126 49.656 60.126 70.848 70.848 46.471 46.471 46.471 46.471 76.290 60.360
dc=(-AsEs+Sqr((AsEs)^2
+2bAsEsEc,effd))/(bEc,eff)

Cracked I = As(d-dc)^2
5E+07 2E+08 2E+08 1E+08 4E+07 3E+07 3E+07 3E+07 5E+07 7E+07 5E+07 7E+07 2E+08 2E+08 3E+07 3E+07 3E+07 3E+07 1E+08 5E+07
+(1/3)(Ec,eff/Es)*bdc^3 (mm^4)

zc = I / dc (mm^3) 1E+06 2E+06 3E+06 2E+06 7E+05 6E+05 6E+05 7E+05 1E+06 1E+06 1E+06 1E+06 2E+06 2E+06 7E+05 7E+05 7E+05 7E+05 2E+06 9E+05
zs = I / (d-dc) (mm^3) 2E+05 7E+05 7E+05 4E+05 3E+05 2E+05 2E+05 2E+05 2E+05 4E+05 2E+05 4E+05 5E+05 5E+05 2E+05 2E+05 2E+05 2E+05 6E+05 4E+05
Design Moment (MEd = MRC) 52.42 105.33 79.40 13.20 36.14 25.05 17.33 41.90 41.57 68.70 6.84 20.04 14.37 8.99 8.18 15.28 2.94 17.60 72.71 94.81
Stress in conc σc = (MEd /
8.785 9.339 5.045 1.057 8.334 7.051 4.430 10.051 7.111 9.937 1.169 2.898 0.982 0.614 1.866 3.488 0.671 4.018 6.915 17.363
zc)*(Ec,eff / Es)
Allowable Compressive Stress =
19.200 19.200 19.200 19.200 19.200 19.200 19.200 19.200 19.200 19.200 19.200 19.200 19.200 19.200 19.200 19.200 19.200 19.200 19.200 19.200 IRC:112-CL 12.2.1(1)
0.48 f ck

Check on Concrete Stress OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK

Stress in Steel σs = (MEd / zs) 219 150 108 31 113 135 95 203 176 190 29 55 31 19 38 72 14 83 123 245 IRC:112-CL 12.2.1(1)

Allowable Tensile Stress = 0.8

400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 IRC:112-CL 12.2.2
f yk
Check on Steel Stress OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK

Page 40 of 65
Project CONSTRUCTION OF 38.000 METER SPAN BRIDGE OVER KRODA KHAD ON RAMPUR GAURA MASHNOO JEORI ROAD AT RD 35/825. Consultant: Infrastructure Technologies

Calculation by SK Design Note No. DN/P-142/002

1. Check whether Linear Creep or Non-linear Creep is applicable for Quasi-Permanent load
MEMBER DECK SLAB WEB WALL SOFFIT SLAB Near CG
Design Section S1 S2 S3 S4 S5 S6 S7 S8 S9 S10 S11 S12
Nature of Moment HOG HOG HOG SAG HOG SAG HOG SAG NM PM NM PM HOG SAG HOG SAG HOG SAG HOG HOG
Design Moment MQP 18.53 34.93 22.93 0.00 14.18 8.44 10.45 12.23 0.00 32.89 0.00 12.13 6.82 1.44 0.00 8.73 0.00 11.85 12.16 12.20
Stress in conc σc = (MQP /
3.104 3.097 1.457 0.000 3.269 2.375 2.672 2.935 0.000 4.758 0.000 1.754 0.465 0.099 0.000 1.993 0.000 2.706 1.156 2.234
zc)*(Ec,eff / Es)
Stress limit for considering linear
14.400 14.400 14.400 14.400 14.400 14.400 14.400 14.400 14.400 14.400 14.400 14.400 14.400 14.400 14.400 14.400 14.400 14.400 14.400 14.400 IRC:112-CL 12.2.1(1)
creep = 0.36 f ck

Creep Model: if σc <=0.36 fck

then "Linear" else "Non- Linear Linear Linear Linear Linear Linear Linear Linear Linear Linear Linear Linear Linear Linear Linear Linear Linear Linear Linear Linear
Linear"

2. Find Creep Coeff Φ(70 Yrs) considering RH -80% and Age at loading as 28 days
MEMBER DECK SLAB WEB WALL SOFFIT SLAB Near CG
Design Section S1 S2 S3 S4 S5 S6 S7 S8 S9 S10 S11 S12
Nature of Moment HOG HOG HOG SAG HOG SAG HOG SAG NM PM NM PM HOG SAG HOG SAG HOG SAG HOG HOG
b 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000
D 303.30 350.00 441.00 441.00 225.00 225.00 243.80 243.80 300.00 300.00 300.00 300.00 483.00 483.00 250.00 250.00 250.00 250.00 350.00 250.00
Ac 303300 350000 441000 441000 225000 225000 243800 243800 300000 300000 300000 300000 483000 483000 250000 250000 250000 250000 350000 250000
u=2b 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000
Notional Size 152 175 221 221 113 113 122 122 150 150 150 150 242 242 125 125 125 125 175 125
Φ(70 Yrs) 1.8993 1.8889 1.8687 1.8687 1.9750 1.9750 1.9562 1.9562 1.9000 1.9000 1.9000 1.9000 1.8593 1.8593 1.9500 1.9500 1.9500 1.9500 1.8889 1.9500 Interpolation from
IRC:112-CL 6.4.2.7(2) Table 6.9

3. Calculation for Ec,eff for combination of Short Term and Long Term Effects
MEMBER DECK SLAB WEB WALL SOFFIT SLAB Near CG
Design Section S1 S2 S3 S4 S5 S6 S7 S8 S9 S10 S11 S12
Nature of Moment HOG HOG HOG SAG HOG SAG HOG SAG NM PM NM PM HOG SAG HOG SAG HOG SAG HOG HOG
Short term Modulus Ecm 33000 33000 33000 33000 33000 33000 33000 33000 33000 33000 33000 33000 33000 33000 33000 33000 33000 33000 33000 33000

Long term Modulus Ecm/(1+Φ) 11382 11423 11504 11504 11092 11092 11163 11163 11379 11379 11379 11379 11541 11541 11186 11186 11186 11186 11423 11186 IRC:112-CL 6.4.2.5(4)(iii)

Total Moment MRC 52.42 105.33 79.40 13.20 36.14 25.05 17.33 41.90 41.57 68.70 6.84 20.04 14.37 8.99 8.18 15.28 2.94 17.60 72.71 94.81

Page 41 of 65
Project CONSTRUCTION OF 38.000 METER SPAN BRIDGE OVER KRODA KHAD ON RAMPUR GAURA MASHNOO JEORI ROAD AT RD 35/825. Consultant: Infrastructure Technologies

Calculation by SK Design Note No. DN/P-142/002

Moment Due to Transient (short

33.896 70.402 56.478 13.200 21.963 16.608 6.877 29.667 41.571 35.807 6.835 7.909 7.558 7.545 8.175 6.548 2.941 5.747 60.548 82.61
term) Loads MST=MRC-MQP

Effective Modulus
Ec,eff = ( MQP + MST ) Ecm / ( MST 19746 20290 21435 33000 18594 19816 15138 21004 33000 17280 33000 15349 17538 25414 33000 15609 33000 14265 25078 26381
+ (1+Φ)MQP )

4 Cracked Section Stress Check at 70 Years

MEMBER DECK SLAB WEB WALL SOFFIT SLAB Near CG
Design Section S1 S2 S3 S4 S5 S6 S7 S8 S9 S10 S11 S12
Nature of Moment HOG HOG HOG SAG HOG SAG HOG SAG NM PM NM PM HOG SAG HOG SAG HOG SAG HOG HOG
Effective Modulus of Elasticity of
concrete Ec,eff = as 19746 20290 21435 33000 18594 19816 15138 21004 33000 17280 33000 15349 17538 25414 33000 15609 33000 14265 25078 26381
calculated above
Modulus of Elasticity of Steel Es
200000 200000 200000 200000 200000 200000 200000 200000 200000 200000 200000 200000 200000 200000 200000 200000 200000 200000 200000 200000
(Mpa)
Area of Steel As (mm^2) 1005 2576 2011 1131 2011 1131 1005 1131 1005 1571 1005 1571 1131 1131 1131 1131 1131 1131 2136 2136
b 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000
d 255.30 300.78 393.00 395.00 177.00 179.00 195.80 197.80 252.00 250.00 252.00 250.00 437.00 437.00 204.00 204.00 204.00 204.00 301.06 201.06
Depth of Concrete in
Compression(mm)
62.64 100.78 104.11 67.05 68.50 53.52 60.05 55.38 49.66 78.88 49.66 82.74 94.05 79.75 46.47 63.76 46.47 66.12 85.67 66.11
dc=(-AsEs+Sqr((AsEs)^2
+2bAsEsEc,effd))/(bEc,eff)

Cracked I = As(d-dc)^2
5E+07 1E+08 2E+08 1E+08 3E+07 2E+07 2E+07 3E+07 5E+07 6E+07 5E+07 6E+07 2E+08 2E+08 3E+07 3E+07 3E+07 3E+07 1E+08 5E+07
+(1/3)(Ec,eff/Es)*bdc^3 (mm^4)

zc = I / dc (mm^3) 7E+05 1E+06 2E+06 2E+06 5E+05 4E+05 4E+05 5E+05 1E+06 8E+05 1E+06 7E+05 2E+06 2E+06 7E+05 5E+05 7E+05 4E+05 1E+06 8E+05
zs = I / (d-dc) (mm^3) 2E+05 7E+05 7E+05 4E+05 3E+05 2E+05 2E+05 2E+05 2E+05 4E+05 2E+05 3E+05 5E+05 5E+05 2E+05 2E+05 2E+05 2E+05 6E+05 4E+05
Design Moment (MEd = MRC) 52.42 105.33 79.404 13.200 36.139 25.045 17.331 41.901 41.571 68.698 6.835 20.035 14.373 8.988 8.175 15.277 2.941 17.601 72.707 94.81

Page 42 of 65
Project CONSTRUCTION OF 38.000 METER SPAN BRIDGE OVER KRODA KHAD ON RAMPUR GAURA MASHNOO JEORI ROAD AT RD 35/825. Consultant: Infrastructure Technologies

Calculation by SK Design Note No. DN/P-142/002

Check on Concrete Stress OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK

Stress in Steel σs = (MEd / zs) 222.44 153.03 110.22 31.32 116.59 137.41 98.07 206.58 175.63 195.50 28.88 57.35 31.33 19.36 38.34 73.91 13.79 85.53 124.89 247.92 IRC:112-CL 12.2.1(1)

Allowable Tensile Stress = 0.8

400.00 400.00 400.00 400.00 400.00 400.00 400.00 400.00 400.00 400.00 400.00 400.00 400.00 400.00 400.00 400.00 400.00 400.00 400.00 400.00 IRC:112-CL 12.2.2
f yk
Check on Steel Stress OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK

Page 43 of 65
Project CONSTRUCTION OF 38.000 METER SPAN BRIDGE OVER KRODA KHAD ON RAMPUR GAURA MASHNOO JEORI ROAD AT RD 35/825. Consultant: Infrastructure Technologies

Calculation by SK Design Note No. DN/P-142/002

Allowable Crack width wk 0.3 mm For moderate exposure condition and Reinforced Concrete members from IRC:112 Clause 12.3.2(1) Table 12.1

1.4.9.1 CHECK FOR MINIMUM REINFORCEMENT FOR CRACK CONTROL

MEMBER DECK SLAB WEB WALL SOFFIT SLAB Near CG
Design Section S1 S2 S3 S4 S5 S6 S7 S8 S9 S10 S11 S12
Nature of Moment HOG HOG HOG SAG HOG SAG HOG SAG NM PM NM PM HOG SAG HOG SAG HOG SAG HOG HOG
b 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000
h=D 303 350 441 441 225 225 244 244 300 300 300 300 483 483 250 250 250 250 350 250
Depth of section in tension
152 175 221 221 113 113 122 122 150 150 150 150 242 242 125 125 125 125 175 125
before crack forms h/2

Area of concrete in tension just

151650 175000 220500 220500 112500 112500 121900 121900 150000 150000 150000 150000 241500 241500 125000 125000 125000 125000 175000 125000
before crack formation Act =b*h/2

f ct,eff = max( f ctm , 2.9) 3.000 3.000 3.000 3.000 3.000 3.000 3.000 3.000 3.000 3.000 3.000 3.000 3.000 3.000 3.000 3.000 3.000 3.000 3.000 3.000

Coeff for effect of non uniform

self equilibrating stresses which
0.998 0.965 0.901 0.901 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 0.872 0.872 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 0.965 1.000
lead to reduction of restraint
forces k

Axial Forces in Quasi perm.

0.166 0.225 -4.216 -11.211 -6.909 -13.919 -6.919 -14.052 44.584 45.807 55.698 56.922 11.731 4.819 14.015 7.008 14.015 7.008 0.000 0.000
Combination NEd
mean stress of concrete σc = NEd
0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
/ (bh)

h* = h for h<1000 else h* =1000 303.3 350.0 441.0 441.0 225.0 225.0 243.8 243.8 300.0 300.0 300.0 300.0 483.0 483.0 250.0 250.0 250.0 250.0 350.0 250.0

Coeff for considering effect of

Axial force Ned on stress
distribution k1 = 1.5 for 1.500 1.500 0.667 0.667 0.667 0.667 0.667 0.667 1.500 1.500 1.500 1.500 1.500 1.500 1.500 1.500 1.500 1.500 1.500 1.500
compressive and (2h*) / (3h) for
Tensile

Page 44 of 65
Project CONSTRUCTION OF 38.000 METER SPAN BRIDGE OVER KRODA KHAD ON RAMPUR GAURA MASHNOO JEORI ROAD AT RD 35/825. Consultant: Infrastructure Technologies

Calculation by SK Design Note No. DN/P-142/002

Coeff to take into account stress

distribution just prior to cracking
and change of Lever Arm 0.400 0.400 0.400 0.400 0.400 0.400 0.400 0.400 0.400 0.400 0.400 0.400 0.400 0.400 0.400 0.400 0.400 0.400 0.400 0.400
kc = 0.4 ( 1 - σc / ( k1( h / h* )
f ct,eff ) ) <= 1

bar dia - φ1 16 16 16 12 16 12 16 12 16 20 16 20 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12
Spacing - s1 200 200 200 100 200 100 200 100 200 200 200 200 100 100 100 100 100 100 200 200
Number - n1 5 5 5 10 5 10 5 10 5 5 5 5 10 10 10 10 10 10 5 5
bar dia - φ2 0 20 16 0 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 20
Spacing - s2 0 200 200 0 200 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 200 200
Number - n2 0 5 5 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 5
2
Equivqlent Bar Dia Φ = (n1φ1 +
16 18 16 12 16 12 16 12 16 20 16 20 12 12 12 12 12 12 17 17
n1φ12) / (n1φ1 + n1φ1)

Equivalent Spacing s 200 100 100 100 100 100 200 100 200 200 200 200 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100
Permited σs from bar dia 240 230 240 280 240 280 240 280 240 222 240 222 280 280 280 280 280 280 236 236 Interpolat.Fr. IRC:112 Table 12.2

Permited σs from bar spacing 240 320 320 320 320 320 240 320 240 240 240 240 320 320 320 320 320 320 320 320 Interpolat. Fr.IRC:112 Table 12.3

Permited σs = min of above 2

240 230 240 280 240 280 240 280 240 222 240 222 280 280 280 280 280 280 236 236
values
As.min = kckf ct,effAct / σs 756 881 994 852 563 482 610 522 750 810 750 810 902 902 536 536 536 536 860 637
Provided steel 1005 2576 2011 1131 2011 1131 1005 1131 1005 1571 1005 1571 1131 1131 1131 1131 1131 1131 2136 2136
Chk on Proovided Steel for
OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK
Crack Control

Page 45 of 65
Project CONSTRUCTION OF 38.000 METER SPAN BRIDGE OVER KRODA KHAD ON RAMPUR GAURA MASHNOO JEORI ROAD AT RD 35/825. Consultant: Infrastructure Technologies

Calculation by SK Design Note No. DN/P-142/002

1. Analysis of section for Quasi-Permanent loads at 70 Years

MEMBER DECK SLAB WEB WALL SOFFIT SLAB Near CG
Design Section S1 S2 S3 S4 S5 S6 S7 S8 S9 S10 S11 S12
Nature of Moment HOG HOG HOG SAG HOG SAG HOG SAG NM PM NM PM HOG SAG HOG SAG HOG SAG HOG HOG
Effective Modulus of Elasticity of
concrete Ec,eff = as 19746 20290 21435 33000 18594 19816 15138 21004 33000 17280 33000 15349 17538 25414 33000 15609 33000 14265 25078 26381
calculated above
Modulus of Elasticity of Steel Es
200000 200000 200000 200000 200000 200000 200000 200000 200000 200000 200000 200000 200000 200000 200000 200000 200000 200000 200000 200000
(Mpa)
Area of Steel As (mm^2) 1005 2576 2011 1131 2011 1131 1005 1131 1005 1571 1005 1571 1131 1131 1131 1131 1131 1131 2136 2136
b 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000
d 255 301 393 395 177 179 196 198 252 250 252 250 437 437 204 204 204 204 301 201
Depth of Concrete in
Compression(mm)
62.64 100.78 104.11 67.05 68.50 53.52 60.05 55.38 49.66 78.88 49.66 82.74 94.05 79.75 46.47 63.76 46.47 66.12 85.67 66.11
dc=(-AsEs+Sqr((AsEs)^2
+2bAsEsEc,effd))/(bEc,eff)

Cracked I = As(d-dc)^2
5E+07 1E+08 2E+08 1E+08 3E+07 2E+07 2E+07 3E+07 5E+07 6E+07 5E+07 6E+07 2E+08 2E+08 3E+07 3E+07 3E+07 3E+07 1E+08 5E+07
+(1/3)(Ec,eff/Es)*bdc^3 (mm^4)

zc = I / dc (mm^3) 7E+05 1E+06 2E+06 2E+06 5E+05 4E+05 4E+05 5E+05 1E+06 8E+05 1E+06 7E+05 2E+06 2E+06 7E+05 5E+05 7E+05 4E+05 1E+06 8E+05
zs = I / (d-dc) (mm^3) 2E+05 7E+05 7E+05 4E+05 3E+05 2E+05 2E+05 2E+05 2E+05 4E+05 2E+05 3E+05 5E+05 5E+05 2E+05 2E+05 2E+05 2E+05 6E+05 4E+05
Design Moment (MEd = MQP) 18.526 34.932 22.926 0.000 14.176 8.437 10.454 12.234 0.000 32.891 0.000 12.126 6.815 1.443 0.000 8.729 0.000 11.854 12.159 12.200
Stress in conc σc = (MEd /
2.52 2.59 1.23 0.00 2.68 1.96 1.98 2.46 0.00 3.73 0.00 1.32 0.36 0.09 0.00 1.50 0.00 1.97 1.04 2.06
zc)*(Ec,eff / Es)

Stress in Steel σs = (MEd / zs) 78.61 50.75 31.82 0.00 45.73 46.29 59.16 60.32 0.00 93.60 0.00 34.71 14.85 3.11 0.00 42.23 0.00 57.60 20.89 31.90 IRC:112-CL 12.2.1(1)

Page 46 of 65
Project CONSTRUCTION OF 38.000 METER SPAN BRIDGE OVER KRODA KHAD ON RAMPUR GAURA MASHNOO JEORI ROAD AT RD 35/825. Consultant: Infrastructure Technologies

Calculation by SK Design Note No. DN/P-142/002

Client EXECUTIVE ENGINEER (B&R), HPPWD DIVISION RAMPUR, DISTRICT SHIMLA.
Cheked by ARK Rev. No R0
Title TRANSVERSE ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF BOX GIRDER Approved by PK Date 18 July 2024
2. Calculation of Crack Width w k
MEMBER DECK SLAB WEB WALL SOFFIT SLAB Near CG
Design Section S1 S2 S3 S4 S5 S6 S7 S8 S9 S10 S11 S12
Nature of Moment HOG HOG HOG SAG HOG SAG HOG SAG NM PM NM PM HOG SAG HOG SAG HOG SAG HOG HOG
b 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000
h=D 303 350 441 441 225 225 244 244 300 300 300 300 483 483 250 250 250 250 350 250
d 255.30 300.78 393.00 395.00 177.00 179.00 195.80 197.80 252.00 250.00 252.00 250.00 437.00 437.00 204.00 204.00 204.00 204.00 301.06 201.06
x = dc calculated Above 62.64 100.78 104.11 67.05 68.50 53.52 60.05 55.38 49.66 78.88 49.66 82.74 94.05 79.75 46.47 63.76 46.47 66.12 85.67 66.11
hc,eff = min( 2.5(h-d) , (h-x)/3,
80.22 83.07 112.30 115.00 52.17 57.16 61.25 62.81 83.45 73.71 83.45 72.42 115.00 115.00 67.84 62.08 67.84 61.29 88.11 61.30
h/2 )
Ac,eff = b hc,eff 80221 83073 112296 115000 52166 57159 61250 62805 83448 73707 83448 72419 115000 115000 67843 62082 67843 61292 88110 61295
As 1005 2576 2011 1131 2011 1131 1005 1131 1005 1571 1005 1571 1131 1131 1131 1131 1131 1131 2136 2136
ρp,eff = As / Ac,eff 0.0125 0.031 0.0179 0.0098 0.0385 0.0198 0.0164 0.018 0.012 0.0213 0.012 0.0217 0.0098 0.0098 0.0167 0.0182 0.0167 0.0185 0.0242 0.0349 IRC:112 Clause 12.3.4 Eq 12.7
Coeff for Bond Properties k1 (0.8
0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80
for deformed bars)
Coeff for strain dist k2 (0.5 for
0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50
bending)
Clear Cover to Long Reinf c
40.00 40.00 40.00 40.00 40.00 40.00 40.00 40.00 40.00 40.00 40.00 40.00 40.00 40.00 40.00 40.00 40.00 40.00 40.00 40.00
(mm) < 50mm
Eq Dai of Bar Φ 16.00 18.22 16.00 12.00 16.00 12.00 16.00 12.00 16.00 20.00 16.00 20.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 17.00 17.00
Eq Spacing of Reinf. Sp 200.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 200.00 100.00 200.00 200.00 200.00 200.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00
5(c+Φ/2) 240.00 245.56 240.00 230.00 240.00 230.00 240.00 230.00 240.00 250.00 240.00 250.00 230.00 230.00 230.00 230.00 230.00 230.00 242.50 242.50

Max crack Spacing For Sp

<=5(c+Φ/2)
Sr.max= 3.4c + 0.425 k1k2Φ / ρp,eff 353.05 235.90 287.92 343.43 206.57 239.10 301.72 249.29 361.78 295.54 361.78 292.75 343.43 343.43 258.37 247.98 258.37 246.56 255.20 218.92 IRC:112 Cl. 12.3.4 Eq 12.8/12.12
and For Sp > 5(c+Φ/2)
Sr.max = 1.3*( h-x )

Factor dependent on duration

of loading kt (taken as 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5
0.5)
Stress in tension Reinforcement
78.61 50.75 31.82 0.00 45.73 46.29 59.16 60.32 0.00 93.60 0.00 34.71 14.85 3.11 0.00 42.23 0.00 57.60 20.89 31.90
σsc
Modulus of Elasticity of Steel Es
200000 200000 200000 200000 200000 200000 200000 200000 200000 200000 200000 200000 200000 200000 200000 200000 200000 200000 200000 200000
(Mpa)

Page 47 of 65
Project CONSTRUCTION OF 38.000 METER SPAN BRIDGE OVER KRODA KHAD ON RAMPUR GAURA MASHNOO JEORI ROAD AT RD 35/825. Consultant: Infrastructure Technologies

Calculation by SK Design Note No. DN/P-142/002

Allowable Crack Width (mm) 0.300 0.300 0.300 0.300 0.300 0.300 0.300 0.300 0.300 0.300 0.300 0.300 0.300 0.300 0.300 0.300 0.300 0.300 0.300 0.300

Chk on allowable Crack Width OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK

Page 48 of 65
Project CONSTRUCTION OF 38.000 METER SPAN BRIDGE OVER KRODA KHAD ON RAMPUR GAURA MASHNOO JEORI ROAD AT RD 35/825. Consultant: Infrastructure Technologies

Calc. by SK Design Note No. DN/P-142/002

Client EXECUTIVE ENGINEER (B&R), HPPWD DIVISION RAMPUR, DISTRICT SHIMLA.
Chk. by ARK Rev. No R0
Title TRANSVERSE ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF BOX GIRDER App. by PK Date 18 July 2024
2 DESIGN OF DIAPHRAGM

2.1 STRUCTURAL MODEL (STRUT AND TIE FORCES FOR HOGGING)

Diaphragm is considered as Deep Beam Supported on Bearing For Normal Condition and on Jacks for Jackup Condition and idealised as strut and tie model as shown in Figure Below
It is assumed that Load eoqual to reaction R From suuperstructure is transferred Through Centreline of webs to the bearings / Jacks
Thickness of Diaphragm 0.4 m f cd 17.867 Mpa
Bearing Plate Dimension in Transverse Direction 0.5 m Width of Bearing Plate considering Dispersion 1.1
Jack Dimension in Transverse Direction 0.3 m Width of Jack plate considering Dispersion 0.9

2.1.1 STRUT AND TIE FORCES AND DESIGN IN NORMAL CONDITION

Cl of Web Cl of Box Cl of Web

3.45
Max ULS reaction is taken from Global Model For Basic/Seismic combination B Tie BC 0.3 C
Reaction R 3363.00 KN 0.6 0.3
Compressive Force in Strut AB (CAB=R/Cosθ) 3575.55 KN DIAPHRAGM 2.4
Thickness of Strut AB 0.4 m
Width Of Strut AB = Bearing Dispersed Dim x cosθ 1.03461 m Strut AB 1.8
2
Area of Strut AB 0.41384 m θ= 19.8552 deg 1.2
Compressive stress in Strut AB 8.63986 Mpa R OPENING R
Check if compressive stress is less than Fcd OK
Compressive Force in Strut AD (CAD=CAB x Sinθ) 1214.42 KN A Strut AD 0.3 D
Thickness of Strut AD 0.4 m 0.6 0.3
Width Of Strut AD 0.6 m R R
2
Area of Strut AD 0.24 m Cl of Bearing Cl of Bearing
Compressive stress in Strut AB 5.06007 Mpa
Check if compressive stress is less than Fcd OK 0.65 STRUT & TIE MODEL IN NORMAL CONDITION 0.65
Tensile Force in Tie BC (TBC=CAB x Sinθ) 1214.42 KN
Minimum Yeild Stress/0.2% proof stress f yk 500 Mpa
Partial factor of safety for basic and seismic γs 1.15
2
Steel Req To resist Tesnsion As,req = Ft γs / fyk) 2793.16 mm

Page 49 of 65
Project CONSTRUCTION OF 38.000 METER SPAN BRIDGE OVER KRODA KHAD ON RAMPUR GAURA MASHNOO JEORI ROAD AT RD 35/825. Consultant: Infrastructure Technologies

Calc. by SK Design Note No. DN/P-142/002

Client EXECUTIVE ENGINEER (B&R), HPPWD DIVISION RAMPUR, DISTRICT SHIMLA.
Chk. by ARK Rev. No R0
Title TRANSVERSE ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF BOX GIRDER App. by PK Date 18 July 2024

2.1.2 STRUT AND TIE FORCES AND DESIGN IN JACK UP CONDITION

Rection is taken from Global Model For indivisual load cases
S.no Load Case L LF R
1 Self weight 1210 1.35 1633.5
2 SIDL except Surfacing 164 1.35 221.4
3 SIDL SURFACING 122 1.75 213.5
Total R 2068.4
Cl of Web Cl of Box Cl of Web
Reaction R 2068.40 KN 3.45
Compressive Force in Strut AB (CAB=R/Cosθ) 2585.50 KN B Tie BC 0.3 C
Thickness of Strut AB 0.4 m 0.6 0.3
Width Of Strut AB = Jack Plate Dispersed Dim x cosθ 0.72 m DIAPHRAGM 2.4
2
Area of Strut AB 0.288 m
Compressive stress in Strut AB 8.97743 Mpa Strut AB 1.8
Check if compressive stress is less than Fcd OK θ= 36.8699 deg 1.2
Compressive Force in Strut AD (CAD=CAB x Sinθ) 1551.3 KN R OPENING R
Thickness of Strut AD 0.4 m
Width Of Strut AD 0.6 m A Strut AD 0.3 D
2
Area of Strut AD 0.24 m 0.6 0.3
Compressive stress in Strut AB 6.46375 Mpa R R
Check if compressive stress is less than Fcd OK Cl of Bearing Cl of Bearing
Tensile Force in Tie BC (TBC=CAB x Sinθ) 1551.3 KN
Minimum Yeild Stress/0.2% proof stress f yk 500 Mpa 1.35 STRUT & TIE MODEL IN JACKUP CONDITION 1.35
Partial factor of safety for basic and seismic γs 1
2
Steel Req To resist Tesnsion As,req = Ft γs / fyk) 3567.99 mm

Page 50 of 65
Project CONSTRUCTION OF 38.000 METER SPAN BRIDGE OVER KRODA KHAD ON RAMPUR GAURA MASHNOO JEORI ROAD AT RD 35/825. Consultant: Infrastructure Technologies

Calc. by SK Design Note No. DN/P-142/002

Client EXECUTIVE ENGINEER (B&R), HPPWD DIVISION RAMPUR, DISTRICT SHIMLA.
Chk. by ARK Rev. No R0
Title TRANSVERSE ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF BOX GIRDER App. by PK Date 18 July 2024

2
Governing Steel area required is max of Normal And Jackup Condition As,req 3567.99 mm
Mean tensile strength of concrete fctm 3 Mpa
min Cover 40 mm
Stirrup Dia 16 mm
Depth For Dist of steel 488 mm
Cg of steel from Top 300 mm
Effective Depth 2100 mm
Minimum Resinforcement as per Clause 16.5.1.1 of IRC 112 maximum of
2
As,min=0.26(fctm/fyk)*bd 1310.4 mm
3
As,min=0.0013*bd 1092 mm
4
As,min=max of above 2 1310.4 mm
2
Steel Req To resist Tesnsion As,req 3567.99 mm

Reinforcement Provision

Layer Dist From Top Spacing Dia No A prov

1 69 25 3 1472.62
2 184 115 25 3 1472.62
3 300 116 25 3 1472.62
4 416 116 25 3 1472.62
5 531 115 25 3 1472.62 462
Total Reinforcement Provided 7363.11 OK

Page 51 of 65
Project CONSTRUCTION OF 38.000 METER SPAN BRIDGE OVER KRODA KHAD ON RAMPUR GAURA MASHNOO JEORI ROAD AT RD 35/825. Consultant: Infrastructure Technologies

Calc. by SK Design Note No. DN/P-142/002

Client EXECUTIVE ENGINEER (B&R), HPPWD DIVISION RAMPUR, DISTRICT SHIMLA.
Chk. by ARK Rev. No R0
Title TRANSVERSE ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF BOX GIRDER App. by PK Date 18 July 2024
2.2 ANALYSIS AND DESIGN FOR NORMAL SAGGING CONDITION

CL of Diaphragm
38000 1100
2.2.1 LOADING ZONE FOR DIAPHRAGM
CL Web 45 deg

For Span side of Diaphragm load within the 45 degree triangle shall contribute to sagging
However coservatively any load upto a distance of span /2 on both side shall be `
assumed to be taken by cross girder
3450 1725 1100
Shaded area in the figure shows the load contributing area
Hence Loading Zone width 2825 mm

2.2.2 LOADS

2.2.2.1 SELF WEIGHT (SW) CL Web 45 deg

Diphragm length 2825 mm
Height of Diaphragm 2400 mm
Thk 400 mm 42.5313 kN/m
self weight per m length of Diaphragm 24 KN/m
width of Slab Contributing from span side 1525 mm
Thk 250 mm 0.65 2.150 0.650
Self weight due to slab per m length of Cross Girder 9.53125 KN/m
width of overhang slab Contributing 900 mm 3.45
Thk 400 mm
9.00 KN/m
Total self Weight per m length 42.53 KN/m
Sagging Moment At Mid Span 15.5904 kN-m

Page 52 of 65
Project CONSTRUCTION OF 38.000 METER SPAN BRIDGE OVER KRODA KHAD ON RAMPUR GAURA MASHNOO JEORI ROAD AT RD 35/825. Consultant: Infrastructure Technologies

Calc. by SK Design Note No. DN/P-142/002

Client EXECUTIVE ENGINEER (B&R), HPPWD DIVISION RAMPUR, DISTRICT SHIMLA.
Chk. by ARK Rev. No R0
Title TRANSVERSE ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF BOX GIRDER App. by PK Date 18 July 2024
2.2.2.2 SUPERIMPOSED DEAD LOAD OF CRASH BARRIER (SD)
2
Area Of Crossection 0m
Weight per m 0 kN/m
Load 0 kN
Sagging Moment At Mid Span 0 kN-m

2.2.2.3 SUPERIMPOSED DEAD LOAD OF SURFACEING (SDS) 4.59063 kN/m

Thickness 65 mm
width 2825 mm
Weight per unit length 4.59063 kN/m 0.65 2.150 0.650
Sagging Moment At Mid Span 1.68275 kN-m
3.45

2.2.2.4 LIVE LOAD (LL)

Impact Factor For Cross girder

For Class A 1.5
For 70R wheeled 1.25
For 70R tracked 1.25

It is assummed conservatively that for the axle load configuration of different types of load as per IRC:6 only heviest load that can be applied within the Loading Zone width of girder will be considetred

Page 53 of 65
Project CONSTRUCTION OF 38.000 METER SPAN BRIDGE OVER KRODA KHAD ON RAMPUR GAURA MASHNOO JEORI ROAD AT RD 35/825. Consultant: Infrastructure Technologies

Calc. by SK Design Note No. DN/P-142/002

Load of each Patch for 114kN axle 57 kN

CL of Diaphragm
38000 1100
CL Web
Longitudinally Two Axle of 114kN of Class A 2 lane Loading can be acomudated in loading

2 X 114 kN

2 X 114 kN
zone, transversely only one patch of axle for second lane is accomudated as shown in figure
on the right side for worst placement and correspnding Loading Diagram of diphragm is

Axle

Axle
shown in figure below in which conservatively dispersion of pach load of one eccentric axle is
ignored. Also distributed area of patch is also ignored `
1725

1.8 1.7 1.8

114 114 114 3450

CL Box
RA 1.075 1.075 RB 1.7 Girder/
0.65 0.650 1725 Diaphr-
2.150 3.5 agm
1.725 1.725
3.45 1.8
CL Box Girder/Diaphragm
3.200 1.2 4.2
Reaction RA 176.302 kN CL Web 1725 1100
Bending Moment at Mid Span without impact -15.675 kN-m
Bending Moment at Mid Span with impact -23.512 kN-m

Page 54 of 65
Project CONSTRUCTION OF 38.000 METER SPAN BRIDGE OVER KRODA KHAD ON RAMPUR GAURA MASHNOO JEORI ROAD AT RD 35/825. Consultant: Infrastructure Technologies

Calc. by SK Design Note No. DN/P-142/002

Load of each Patch for 170kN axle 85 kN

CL of Diaphragm
38000 1100
CL Web
Two Axle of 170 kN of 70R Wheeled Load can be accomudated in loading zone as shown in
figure on the right side for worst placement and correspnding Loading Diagram of diphragm is
shown in figure below in which conservatively dispersion of pach load of one eccentric axle is
ignored. Also distributed area of patch is also ignored
` 1725

170 kN Axle

170 kN Axle
170
3450 0.43

CL Box
RA 1.075 1.075 RB Girder/
0.65 0.650 2.79 1725 Diaphr-
2.150 1.93 agm
1.725 1.725
3.45
CL Box Girder/Diaphragm
2.130 1.37 3.05
Reaction RA 85 kN CL Web
Bending Moment at Mid Span without impact 91.375 kN-m 1725 1100
Bending Moment at Mid Span with impact 114.219 kN-m
0.43

Page 55 of 65
Project CONSTRUCTION OF 38.000 METER SPAN BRIDGE OVER KRODA KHAD ON RAMPUR GAURA MASHNOO JEORI ROAD AT RD 35/825. Consultant: Infrastructure Technologies

Calc. by SK Design Note No. DN/P-142/002

Load of each Patch for 170kN axle 42.5 kN

170 kN Axle

170 kN Axle
ignored. Also distributed area of patch is also ignored
`
1725
1.585 0.205
0.795 0.79
0.795
85 85 85 85 3450

2.79 0.79
CL Box
RA 1.075 1.075 RB Girder/
0.65 0.650 1725 Diaphr-
2.150 0.795 agm
1.725 1.725
3.45 0.205
CL Box Girder/Diaphragm
2.130 1.37 3.05
Reaction RA 107.535 kN CL Web
Bending Moment at Mid Span without impact 48.025 kN-m 1725 1100
Bending Moment at Mid Span with impact 60.0313 kN-m

Page 56 of 65
Project CONSTRUCTION OF 38.000 METER SPAN BRIDGE OVER KRODA KHAD ON RAMPUR GAURA MASHNOO JEORI ROAD AT RD 35/825. Consultant: Infrastructure Technologies

Calc. by SK Design Note No. DN/P-142/002

Load of each Patch for 170kN axle 42.5 kN

170 kN Axle

170 kN Axle
ignored. Also distributed area of patch is also ignored
`
1725
1.52 0.255
0.76 0.76
0.76
85 85 85 85 3450

2.79 0.76
CL Box
RA 1.075 1.075 RB Girder/
0.65 0.650 1725 Diaphr-
2.150 0.76 agm
1.725 1.725
3.45 0.255
CL Box Girder/Diaphragm
2.130 1.37 3.05
Reaction RA 109.907 kN CL Web
Bending Moment at Mid Span without impact 53.55 kN-m 1725 1100
Bending Moment at Mid Span with impact 66.9375 kN-m

Page 57 of 65
Project CONSTRUCTION OF 38.000 METER SPAN BRIDGE OVER KRODA KHAD ON RAMPUR GAURA MASHNOO JEORI ROAD AT RD 35/825. Consultant: Infrastructure Technologies

Calc. by SK Design Note No. DN/P-142/002

Load of each Patch 100 kN

CL of Diaphragm
38000 1100
CL Web
Two Axle of 200 kN of 70R Max. Bogie Load can be acomudated in loading zone as shown in
figure on the right side for worst placement and correspnding Loading Diagram of diphragm is
shown in figure below in which conservatively dispersion of pach load of one eccentric axle is
ignored. Also distributed area of patch is also ignored
`
1725

200 kN Axle

200 kN Axle
200
3450 0.43

CL Box
RA 1.075 1.075 RB Girder/
0.65 0.650 1725 Diaphr-
2.150 agm
1.725 1.725 2.79 1.93
3.45
CL Box Girder/Diaphragm
1.22
Reaction RA 100 kN CL Web
Bending Moment at Mid Span without impact 107.5 kN-m 1725 1100
Bending Moment at Mid Span with impact 134.375 kN-m
0.43

Page 58 of 65
Project CONSTRUCTION OF 38.000 METER SPAN BRIDGE OVER KRODA KHAD ON RAMPUR GAURA MASHNOO JEORI ROAD AT RD 35/825. Consultant: Infrastructure Technologies

Calc. by SK Design Note No. DN/P-142/002

Load of each Patch 50 kN

200 kN Axle

200 kN Axle
ignored. Also distributed area of patch is also ignored
`
1725
1.585 0.205
0.795 0.79
0.795
100 100 100 100 3450

2.79 0.79
CL Box
RA 1.075 1.075 RB Girder/
0.65 0.650 Diaphr-
2.150 0.795 1725 agm
1.725 1.725
3.45 0.205
CL Box Girder/Diaphragm
1.22
Reaction RA 126.512 kN CL Web
Bending Moment at Mid Span without impact 56.5 kN-m 1725 1100
Bending Moment at Mid Span with impact 70.625 kN-m

Page 59 of 65
Project CONSTRUCTION OF 38.000 METER SPAN BRIDGE OVER KRODA KHAD ON RAMPUR GAURA MASHNOO JEORI ROAD AT RD 35/825. Consultant: Infrastructure Technologies

Calc. by SK Design Note No. DN/P-142/002

Load of each Patch 50 kN

200 kN Axle

200 kN Axle
ignored. Also distributed area of patch is also ignored
`
1725
1.52 0.255
0.76 0.76
0.76
100 100 100 100 3450

2.79 0.76
CL Box
RA 1.075 1.075 RB Girder/
0.65 0.650 1725 Diaphr-
2.150 0.76 agm
1.725 1.725
3.45 0.255
CL Box Girder/Diaphragm
1.22
Reaction RA 129.302 kN CL Web
Bending Moment at Mid Span without impact 63 kN-m 1725 1100
Bending Moment at Mid Span with impact 78.75 kN-m

Page 60 of 65
Project CONSTRUCTION OF 38.000 METER SPAN BRIDGE OVER KRODA KHAD ON RAMPUR GAURA MASHNOO JEORI ROAD AT RD 35/825. Consultant: Infrastructure Technologies

Calc. by SK Design Note No. DN/P-142/002

Client EXECUTIVE ENGINEER (B&R), HPPWD DIVISION RAMPUR, DISTRICT SHIMLA.
Chk. by ARK Rev. No R0
Title TRANSVERSE ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF BOX GIRDER App. by PK Date 18 July 2024

2.2.2.4.8 70R TRACKED VEHICLE

Load of each Track 350 kN
Length of patch 4.57
CL of Diaphragm
38000 1100

Both Tracks of 700 kN of 70R tracked Vehicle can be acomudated in loading zone as shown
in figure on the right side for worst placement and correspnding Loading Diagram of CL Web
diphragm is shown in figure below in which conservatively dispersion of pach load of one
eccentric axle is ignored. Also distributed area of patch is also ignored

200 kN Axle
Length of Patch in loading zone 2.825 ` 1725
Load of patch acumudated 216.357 kN
4.57

216.357
3450 0.42

CL Box
RA 1.075 1.075 RB Girder/
0.65 0.650 2.9 Diaphr- 1725
2.150 agm
1.725 1.725
3.45 2.06
CL Box Girder/Diaphragm

Reaction RA 216.357 kN CL Web

Bending Moment at Mid Span without impact 232.583 kN-m 1725 1100
Bending Moment at Mid Span with impact 290.729 kN-m
0.42

Page 61 of 65
Project CONSTRUCTION OF 38.000 METER SPAN BRIDGE OVER KRODA KHAD ON RAMPUR GAURA MASHNOO JEORI ROAD AT RD 35/825. Consultant: Infrastructure Technologies

Calc. by SK Design Note No. DN/P-142/002

Load ID Description BM kN-M

2.2.2.4.1 CLASS-A 2 LANE LODING -23.512
2.2.2.4.2 70R WHEELED L-TYPE 114.219
2.2.2.4.3 70R WHEELED M-TYPE 60.031
2.2.2.4.4 70R WHEELED N-TYPE 66.938
2.2.2.4.5 70R MAX. BOGIE LOAD L-TYPE 134.375
2.2.2.4.6 70R MAX. BOGIE LOAD M-TYPE 70.625
2.2.2.4.7 70R MAX. BOGIE LOAD N-TYPE 78.750
2.2.2.4.8 70R TRACKED VEHICLE 290.729
Max Sagging Moment due to LL incuding Impact 290.729

2.2.2.5 LOAD COMBINATIONS (ULS BASIC COMBINATION)

kN-m

ULS_BC
LC Moment
LF Mom
SW 15.59 1.35 21.047
SD 0.00 1.35 0
SDS 1.68 1.75 2.94481
LL 290.73 1.5 436.094
Design Moments 460.086

Page 62 of 65
Project CONSTRUCTION OF 38.000 METER SPAN BRIDGE OVER KRODA KHAD ON RAMPUR GAURA MASHNOO JEORI ROAD AT RD 35/825. Consultant: Infrastructure Technologies

Calc. by SK Design Note No. DN/P-142/002

Span c/c of support 2150 mm

Bearing Dim 500 mm
Clear Span 1650 mm
Effective Span of Cross Girder L 1897.5 mm IS 456 Clause 29.2 effective span taken as minimum of Span c/c of support or 1.15 times the clear Span
Depth D (avg) 2400 mm
L/D 0.791
As per IS 456 clause 29.1 a) if L/D Ratio is less then 2 for simply supported Beam it is designd as Deep Beam Else Normal Beam
Design Method Design as Deep Beam

As per IS:456 clause 29.2 The Lever arm for simply supported Beam Is
z=0.2 ( L + 2D) when 1 <= L/D <= 2
or z=0.6 L when L/D < 1

z = 1138.5 mm

2.2.4 CALCULATION OF POSITIVE REINFORCEMENT FOR SAGGING MOMENT

Tensile Force Ft=M / z 404.116 KN

Minimum Yeild Stress/0.2% proof stress f yk 500 Mpa
Partial factor of safety for basic and seismic γs 1.15
clear Cover c 40
16
Effective Depth d 2119 mm
Bredth pf beam 400 mm
Mean tensile strength of concrete fctm 3 Mpa
Minimum Resinforcement as per Clause 16.5.1.1 of IRC 112 maximum of
2
As,min=0.26(fctm/fyk)*bd 1322.53 mm
3
As,min=0.0013*bd 1102.11 mm
4
As,min=max of above 2 1322.53 mm
2
Steel Req To resist Tesnsion As,req = Ft γs / fyk) 929.466 mm

Page 63 of 65
Project CONSTRUCTION OF 38.000 METER SPAN BRIDGE OVER KRODA KHAD ON RAMPUR GAURA MASHNOO JEORI ROAD AT RD 35/825. Consultant: Infrastructure Technologies

Calc. by SK Design Note No. DN/P-142/002

Client EXECUTIVE ENGINEER (B&R), HPPWD DIVISION RAMPUR, DISTRICT SHIMLA.
Chk. by ARK Rev. No R0
Title TRANSVERSE ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF BOX GIRDER App. by PK Date 18 July 2024
2
Steel to be provided shall ve max of Asmin and As req 1322.53 mm
Zone in which Tension Reinf is to be Provided 0.25D - -0.05 L 505.125 mm IS:456 Clause 29.3.1 c)
defth available Below opening 600 mm
dia of bar to vbe Provided 20 mm
zone in which Reinf is provided leaving cover on top 534 mm

Layer Dist From Bot Spacing Dia No A prov

1 66 20 3 942.478
2 183 117 20 3 942.478
3 300 117 20 3 942.478
4 417 117 20 3 942.478
5 534 117 20 3 942.478
Total Reinforcement Provided 4712.39 OK

2.3 CALCULATION OF VERTICAL REINFORCEMENT

Side Face Reinf Requrement in Vertical direction per m as per IRC:112 Clause 16.9(4) for Deep beam shall be maximum of following
2
0.15 % of the area 600 mm per m distributed on Each Faces
or 150 mm2 per m on each Face 150 mm2 per m distributed on Each Faces
Requiered side Face Reinforcement in Vertical Direction 600 mm2 per m distributed on Each Faces

Provide 12 dia stirrup @ 100 c/c with one leg contributing to reinf on each Face
2
Steel Provided on Each Faces As,prov 1130.97 mm OK

2.4 CALCULATION OF HANGING VERTICAL REINFORCEMENT

Tensile Force from RM analysis Ft Ft 3,363 KN

Minimum Yeild Stress/0.2% proof stress f yk 500
Partial factor of safety for basic and seismic γs 1.15
2
Steel Req To resist Tesnsion As,req = Ft γs / fyk) 7,735 mm
This reinf is to be Provided in form of stirrups and distibuted in width D/2 from main girder centre 1200 mm Or D/3 from face of main girder ie in width 1050 mm from centre, whichever is minimum

Page 64 of 65
Project CONSTRUCTION OF 38.000 METER SPAN BRIDGE OVER KRODA KHAD ON RAMPUR GAURA MASHNOO JEORI ROAD AT RD 35/825. Consultant: Infrastructure Technologies

Calc. by SK Design Note No. DN/P-142/002

Client EXECUTIVE ENGINEER (B&R), HPPWD DIVISION RAMPUR, DISTRICT SHIMLA.
Chk. by ARK Rev. No R0
Title TRANSVERSE ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF BOX GIRDER App. by PK Date 18 July 2024
Thus distribution zone for above reinforcement is 1050 mm from main girder centre
Provide 11 no 20 Dia 4 Leg Stirrups
2
Steel As Provided above 13823 mm OK
Spacing of above 105 mm

Page 65 of 65

T-Roff Girder Design
100% (1)
T-Roff Girder Design
41 pages
DN-P-142-001 Longitudinal Analysis and Design of Box Girder
No ratings yet
DN-P-142-001 Longitudinal Analysis and Design of Box Girder
123 pages
BB3 GEN TER 22406 6 WindAnalysisMethodStatement
No ratings yet
BB3 GEN TER 22406 6 WindAnalysisMethodStatement
279 pages
Launching Erection Scheme
No ratings yet
Launching Erection Scheme
35 pages
Design Note No. DN-P-126-001 Longitudinal Analysis and Design of Box Girder
100% (2)
Design Note No. DN-P-126-001 Longitudinal Analysis and Design of Box Girder
194 pages
Aipl-2 Kkm-Mahalaxmi-Rly-Stn-Rob-Level105-R0 - SH 1 To SH 4
No ratings yet
Aipl-2 Kkm-Mahalaxmi-Rly-Stn-Rob-Level105-R0 - SH 1 To SH 4
4 pages
Barge Supports Detail Design Drawings - 03-April - 2021 - For Construction
No ratings yet
Barge Supports Detail Design Drawings - 03-April - 2021 - For Construction
49 pages
APPENDIX F Stay Cable Design
No ratings yet
APPENDIX F Stay Cable Design
83 pages
O18093-C-Br-Nu-0123-Rd-Sve-Numeration Details of MKD End Unit
No ratings yet
O18093-C-Br-Nu-0123-Rd-Sve-Numeration Details of MKD End Unit
1 page
PSW Palliative Textbook - 2nd Edition
No ratings yet
PSW Palliative Textbook - 2nd Edition
252 pages
Lecture#3 & 4-PGV - PLanning and Design of EDB
No ratings yet
Lecture#3 & 4-PGV - PLanning and Design of EDB
43 pages
Analysis Methods & Software S Session Ii: Aditya Sharma Aniruddha Chande
No ratings yet
Analysis Methods & Software S Session Ii: Aditya Sharma Aniruddha Chande
65 pages
776 Ed MJB 01 7004 R1
No ratings yet
776 Ed MJB 01 7004 R1
3 pages
Design of Pylon Location P13R, P13L, P14R and P14L: DOC. NO.: O22051-C-RP-FL-DC-2015
No ratings yet
Design of Pylon Location P13R, P13L, P14R and P14L: DOC. NO.: O22051-C-RP-FL-DC-2015
689 pages
Dn037ra Irc112 Mar21 2013-Box Girder
No ratings yet
Dn037ra Irc112 Mar21 2013-Box Girder
107 pages
(RB3) - Obando River Bridge 2 - MVR
No ratings yet
(RB3) - Obando River Bridge 2 - MVR
42 pages
Construction Control of The Yamen Cable-Stayed Bridge: Han Dajian Su Cheng
No ratings yet
Construction Control of The Yamen Cable-Stayed Bridge: Han Dajian Su Cheng
6 pages
Bsec 1907 Viaduct DN-24
No ratings yet
Bsec 1907 Viaduct DN-24
60 pages
Welcome To Mandovi Bridge Project Site Goa
No ratings yet
Welcome To Mandovi Bridge Project Site Goa
132 pages
MCFT For Load Rating Examples
No ratings yet
MCFT For Load Rating Examples
70 pages
Design and Stress Check of Cables For Cable Stay Rail Over Bridge, Ranchi
No ratings yet
Design and Stress Check of Cables For Cable Stay Rail Over Bridge, Ranchi
18 pages
Transverse Analysis and Design 32m Curved Span P18-P19
No ratings yet
Transverse Analysis and Design 32m Curved Span P18-P19
56 pages
Transverse Deck Design 32m
No ratings yet
Transverse Deck Design 32m
276 pages
P15 Harpreet Singh 2nd Presentation - PSC Segmental Box Girder PDF
100% (1)
P15 Harpreet Singh 2nd Presentation - PSC Segmental Box Girder PDF
16 pages
RCC Box
No ratings yet
RCC Box
85 pages
TT 00051000046
No ratings yet
TT 00051000046
123 pages
100 Meter Through Truss
No ratings yet
100 Meter Through Truss
13 pages
Nit WBHDCL
100% (1)
Nit WBHDCL
194 pages
E-mosty-March2021 (Yamuna Signature Bridge)
No ratings yet
E-mosty-March2021 (Yamuna Signature Bridge)
63 pages
Decision Tree Report
100% (1)
Decision Tree Report
29 pages
Moolchand Extradosed Bridge For Delhi Me
No ratings yet
Moolchand Extradosed Bridge For Delhi Me
8 pages
Live Load Analysis: 70R Wheel
No ratings yet
Live Load Analysis: 70R Wheel
433 pages
(13-27) Construction of Extradosed Bridge in The Government PDF
100% (1)
(13-27) Construction of Extradosed Bridge in The Government PDF
8 pages
Online Portal User Manual PDF
No ratings yet
Online Portal User Manual PDF
199 pages
Sectional Elevation: P1-L/R P2-L/R New Construction of Flyover
No ratings yet
Sectional Elevation: P1-L/R P2-L/R New Construction of Flyover
2 pages
Analysis and Design of Prestressed Concrete Box Girder Bridge
No ratings yet
Analysis and Design of Prestressed Concrete Box Girder Bridge
14 pages
GGN DD 033 - D0 PDF
No ratings yet
GGN DD 033 - D0 PDF
250 pages
Cannon Ball Review Part 4
100% (1)
Cannon Ball Review Part 4
20 pages
Dynamic Analysis of Soil-Steel Railway Bridge Plaxis 2004
No ratings yet
Dynamic Analysis of Soil-Steel Railway Bridge Plaxis 2004
137 pages
Addendum To The Method Statement For Prestressing Works For Segmental Span, I-Girder and T-Girder (By BBR India Pvt. LTD)
No ratings yet
Addendum To The Method Statement For Prestressing Works For Segmental Span, I-Girder and T-Girder (By BBR India Pvt. LTD)
19 pages
Bridge Manual
No ratings yet
Bridge Manual
166 pages
2024-09-27-Lecture#15-CASE STUDY ON DURGAM CHERUVU EXTRADOSED BRIDGE-Inki CHoi
No ratings yet
2024-09-27-Lecture#15-CASE STUDY ON DURGAM CHERUVU EXTRADOSED BRIDGE-Inki CHoi
44 pages
Study On The Behavior of Box Girder Bridge
No ratings yet
Study On The Behavior of Box Girder Bridge
96 pages
Guide Specs - Bridges Coastal Storm
No ratings yet
Guide Specs - Bridges Coastal Storm
73 pages
PC03-SYS-GEN-ST-REP-10001 Daar Report Draft - 2022 - 04 - 07
No ratings yet
PC03-SYS-GEN-ST-REP-10001 Daar Report Draft - 2022 - 04 - 07
42 pages
Bridge Deck Erection Technology-Best International Practices
No ratings yet
Bridge Deck Erection Technology-Best International Practices
5 pages
TENSACCIAI Stay Cables
No ratings yet
TENSACCIAI Stay Cables
45 pages
VSL Jordan Wadi Abdoun Curved Cable Stayed Bridge PDF
No ratings yet
VSL Jordan Wadi Abdoun Curved Cable Stayed Bridge PDF
2 pages
Third Karnaphuli Bridge: David Astin
No ratings yet
Third Karnaphuli Bridge: David Astin
32 pages
Economical Design of Extra Dosed Bridge
No ratings yet
Economical Design of Extra Dosed Bridge
3 pages
DN-P-142-003 Design of Abutment and Foundation
No ratings yet
DN-P-142-003 Design of Abutment and Foundation
142 pages
Masterbuilder
No ratings yet
Masterbuilder
4 pages
Bach Dang - Option1 - 20160201
No ratings yet
Bach Dang - Option1 - 20160201
20 pages
CMFB Vol 3 Approach Bridge Substructure S1 P2
No ratings yet
CMFB Vol 3 Approach Bridge Substructure S1 P2
45 pages
Diagnostic Trouble Codes (DTC) : DTC P0712 Transmission Fluid Temperature Sensor Circuit Low Input (High Temperature)
No ratings yet
Diagnostic Trouble Codes (DTC) : DTC P0712 Transmission Fluid Temperature Sensor Circuit Low Input (High Temperature)
4 pages
Approach Methodology-Sharavati Bridge-CSB
No ratings yet
Approach Methodology-Sharavati Bridge-CSB
10 pages
Sheet 5
No ratings yet
Sheet 5
1 page
HG-35 User Manual
No ratings yet
HG-35 User Manual
14 pages
(Ebook) Analog and Digital Communications by T. L. Singal ISBN 9780071072694, 0071072691 Instant Download
100% (2)
(Ebook) Analog and Digital Communications by T. L. Singal ISBN 9780071072694, 0071072691 Instant Download
52 pages
480
No ratings yet
480
12 pages
P13 P14 P13 P14 P13 P14: South Eastern Railway
No ratings yet
P13 P14 P13 P14 P13 P14: South Eastern Railway
1 page
SWD 2021 373 f1 Other Staff Working Paper en v7 p1 1647610 Rev
No ratings yet
SWD 2021 373 f1 Other Staff Working Paper en v7 p1 1647610 Rev
52 pages
A Semi-Detailed Lesson Plan in TLE 7 (Productivity, Humility) Common Carpentry Tools January 25, 2017
40% (5)
A Semi-Detailed Lesson Plan in TLE 7 (Productivity, Humility) Common Carpentry Tools January 25, 2017
2 pages
$the Formwork To The Millau Viaduct
No ratings yet
$the Formwork To The Millau Viaduct
104 pages
Bridge at Bhagalpur
No ratings yet
Bridge at Bhagalpur
9 pages
Unbalanced Cantilever Bridge - Jammu - Preview
No ratings yet
Unbalanced Cantilever Bridge - Jammu - Preview
2 pages
Plane Coordinate Projection Tables Georgia: S. Department Commerce
No ratings yet
Plane Coordinate Projection Tables Georgia: S. Department Commerce
21 pages
Chapter 14 - Proportioning and Design Considerations For Extradosed Prestressed Bridges
No ratings yet
Chapter 14 - Proportioning and Design Considerations For Extradosed Prestressed Bridges
14 pages
Marketing (Sample Practical Record - Session - 2024-25)
No ratings yet
Marketing (Sample Practical Record - Session - 2024-25)
148 pages
CSC 330
No ratings yet
CSC 330
3 pages
Lecture 5 Worked Example-Shear-Torsion (Part 2) PDF
No ratings yet
Lecture 5 Worked Example-Shear-Torsion (Part 2) PDF
15 pages
806-Ed-Mjb-01-4103-R0 (SH 1 of 5)
No ratings yet
806-Ed-Mjb-01-4103-R0 (SH 1 of 5)
1 page
Chambal Cable Stayed Bridge Connecting Shores
No ratings yet
Chambal Cable Stayed Bridge Connecting Shores
6 pages
Rail Structure Interaction Documentation
No ratings yet
Rail Structure Interaction Documentation
7 pages
Project:Construction of Extradosed Paira Bridge Project in Bangladesh
No ratings yet
Project:Construction of Extradosed Paira Bridge Project in Bangladesh
3 pages
Aspire One ZA3
No ratings yet
Aspire One ZA3
12 pages
NB/NBR Nitrogen Booster For Aviation Service: 230 Depot Road, Milford, CT 06460
No ratings yet
NB/NBR Nitrogen Booster For Aviation Service: 230 Depot Road, Milford, CT 06460
17 pages
DCS AMRAAM Dev Report EN
No ratings yet
DCS AMRAAM Dev Report EN
7 pages
Demo Activity 1 - Pick - Place
No ratings yet
Demo Activity 1 - Pick - Place
59 pages
2470 2 1985 Reff2022
No ratings yet
2470 2 1985 Reff2022
26 pages
Selection of Erection Technologies For Cable Stayed Bridges in The Aspect of Further Behaviour During Exploitation
No ratings yet
Selection of Erection Technologies For Cable Stayed Bridges in The Aspect of Further Behaviour During Exploitation
4 pages
Biobaja Cecair Multifungsisebagai Inputagronomiinovatif Untuk Pertanian Moden
No ratings yet
Biobaja Cecair Multifungsisebagai Inputagronomiinovatif Untuk Pertanian Moden
4 pages
Strategies To Improve The Structural Integrity of Tied-Arch Bridges Affected by Instability Phenomena
No ratings yet
Strategies To Improve The Structural Integrity of Tied-Arch Bridges Affected by Instability Phenomena
11 pages
(3-13) Use of Artificial Damping (Published Paper)
No ratings yet
(3-13) Use of Artificial Damping (Published Paper)
9 pages
Pushing Local Commits To Github
No ratings yet
Pushing Local Commits To Github
8 pages
This Study Resource Was: Answer
No ratings yet
This Study Resource Was: Answer
5 pages
Toma 0095 A Review of International Guidance For Tsunami Loading On Buildings
No ratings yet
Toma 0095 A Review of International Guidance For Tsunami Loading On Buildings
7 pages
JD For SE Commercial - 2025 Batch
No ratings yet
JD For SE Commercial - 2025 Batch
5 pages
Alekya Resume
No ratings yet
Alekya Resume
4 pages
Sunniberg Bridge, Kiosters, Switzerland: A Height of 50 To 60 M Over The
No ratings yet
Sunniberg Bridge, Kiosters, Switzerland: A Height of 50 To 60 M Over The
3 pages
Theis Info
No ratings yet
Theis Info
5 pages
Asteroid 449 Hamburga
No ratings yet
Asteroid 449 Hamburga
1 page
Weekly Home Learning Plan Tle 9 - Caregiving) : Week 7, Quarter 3, March 28 - April 1, 2022
No ratings yet
Weekly Home Learning Plan Tle 9 - Caregiving) : Week 7, Quarter 3, March 28 - April 1, 2022
2 pages
Practical Firewall
No ratings yet
Practical Firewall
4 pages
Appointment Letter For Practical Examiner HSSC 2 Annual Examination, 2024
No ratings yet
Appointment Letter For Practical Examiner HSSC 2 Annual Examination, 2024
2 pages
Apsara Border
No ratings yet
Apsara Border
15 pages

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.