ABI_Steps
ABI_Steps
In Step 1, teachers/practitioners identify an interfering behavior for a learner with ASD that they
would like to decrease. In most cases, the interfering behavior is one that is interfering with
learning and development (e.g., self-stimulation, repetitive, self-injurious, stereotypical).
Therefore, teachers/practitioners complete a high quality functional behavioral assessment
(FBA) to identify the function of the interfering behavior and select an ABI strategy that
addresses the function of the behavior and can be used to decrease the interfering behavior.
Please refer to Functional Behavioral Assessment: Steps for Implementation (National
Professional Development Center on ASD, 2008) to acquire more in-depth information
about the following FBA strategies.
A-B-C data charts help team members determine what happens right before the behavior (the
antecedent), the behavior that occurs, and what happens directly after the behavior (the
consequence). These data provide insight into why the learner may be engaging in a particular
behavior.
b. scatterplots.
a. the setting events (i.e., the environment or conditions in which the behavior occurs),
immediate antecedents, and immediate consequences that surround the interfering
behavior;
EXAMPLE: Kenny repeatedly bangs his head on his desk when his teacher asks him to
complete an in-class assignment because he does not want to complete the task, and his
teacher then walks away and Kenny does not have to do his work.
EXAMPLE: Mary flaps her hands, rocks back and forth, and yells loudly each time the bell rings
to switch classes because she does not like the noise, and she then needs help from a staff
member to calm down and leave the room. This often results in Mary missing part of or the
entire next class.
EXAMPLE: Kenny will complete in-class assignments without banging his head.
EXAMPLE: 1) Mary will engage in minimal hand-flapping and body rocking when the
bell rings at the end of each class period.
2) Mary will not yell when the bell rings at the end of each class period.
3) Mary will walk to class independently when the bell rings at the end of each
class period.
Step 2. Collecting Baseline Data
Frequency data measures how often a learner engages in a particular behavior. Event
sampling, a method for collecting data on behaviors that occur infrequently, is used to record
every instance of the interfering behavior. Data are then used to identify a potential pattern of a
learner’s behavior over a period of days or weeks. Table 1 provides an example of an event
sampling data collection sheet.
b. duration data.
Duration data are used to record how long a learner engages in a particular behavior during a
class, activity, or treatment session. For example, a teacher might collect data on how long a
learner with ASD engages in hand mouthing during math class. Table 2 provides an example of
a duration data collection sheet.
Baseline data give teachers/practitioners a starting point from which they can evaluate whether
the interfering behavior decreases as a result of ABI.
It often is useful to have more than one practitioner collect baseline data over the course of
several days to compare findings. Also, by collecting data in multiple settings, teachers/
practitioners can potentially recognize patterns of behavior. For example, does the learner
engage in the interfering behavior more often in one setting than another? This kind of
information helps teachers/practitioners identify activities or settings that can be modified using
ABI strategies.
In Step 3, teachers/practitioners identify and implement ABI strategies that directly address the
function of the interfering behavior to prevent its future occurrence.
1. Teachers/practitioners identify one of the following ABI strategies that directly addresses
the function of the interfering behavior:
b. changing schedules/routines,
d. using choice-making,
a. weekly objectives for the learner with ASD that will lead to a decrease in an
interfering behavior,
b. a statement of the strategy and what the teacher will do (e.g., adapting instructions
for assignments), and
The lesson plan provides teachers/practitioners with a structure for identifying what will be
needed to implement the strategy effectively and how the environment will be modified to
decrease the occurrence of the interfering behavior. Table 4 provides a sample lesson plan.
Materials needed:
1. Sentence strips: “Complete these math problems.” “Finish your work.”
2. Checklists for all worksheets that need to be completed this week.
EXAMPLE: Mrs. Banks gives Kenny written instructions to complete an in-class math
assignment. Kenny immediately starts banging his head. Mrs. Banks ignores the behavior and
points to the sentence strip again which says, “Complete these math problems.” Kenny looks at
Mrs. Banks and starts banging his head again. Again, Mrs. Banks points to the sentence strip.
Kenny bangs his head two more times and then starts the assignment.
EXAMPLE: During math class, Mrs. Banks gives Kenny written instructions to complete an in-
class assignment. Kenny bangs his head on his desk one time and then follows the checklist
instructions provided with the math worksheet. After 10 minutes, Kenny completes the
assignment and Mrs. Banks tells Kenny that he can play on the computer for 10 minutes.
The same data collection sheets that were used to collect baseline data can be used to track
learner progress.
If the interfering behavior is not decreasing, teachers/practitioners must try to identify potential
reasons for this. The following questions may be helpful during this problem-solving process.
Is the interfering behavior well defined? That is, is it observable and measurable?
Are ABI strategies being implemented consistently by all staff?
Do the ABI strategies directly address the function of the behavior identified during
the FBA?
References
Cihak, D., Alberto, P. A., & Frederick, L. D. (2007). Use of brief functional analysis and
intervention in public settings. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 9(2), 80-93.
Kern, L., Choutka, C. M., & Sokol, N. G. (2002). Assessment-based antecedent interventions
used in natural settings to reduce challenging behavior: An analysis of the literature.
Education and Treatment of Children, 25(1), 113-130.