978-3-447-12203-0_Inhaltsverzeichnis
978-3-447-12203-0_Inhaltsverzeichnis
978-3-447-12203-0_Inhaltsverzeichnis
Band 42
2024
Harrassowitz Verlag · Wiesbaden
Margaret Swaney
2024
Harrassowitz Verlag · Wiesbaden
Bibliografische Information der Deutschen Nationalbibliothek
Die Deutsche Nationalbibliothek verzeichnet diese Publikation in der Deutschen
Nationalbibliografie; detaillierte bibliografische Daten sind im Internet
über https://dnb.dnb.de abrufbar.
Preface. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . XIII
Chapter 1: Introduction. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
1.1 Overview of the Repit Temple . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
1.2 The Repit Temple in its Historical Context . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
1.3 The Repit Temple’s Main Deities. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
1.4 History of Research at the Repit Temple . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
1.5 Methodology. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
Part I: Macro-Analysis
Chapter 2: Iconography in Context. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
2.1 Adornments: Broad Collars, Armbands, and Wristbands . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18
2.2 The King. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
2.2.1 Royal Headgear. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
2.2.1.1 Wigs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20
2.2.1.2 Nemes-Headdress. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
2.2.1.3 Blue Crown. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23
2.2.1.4 Cap Crown . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25
2.2.1.5 Red and White Crowns. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26
2.2.1.6 Double Crown and its Composites. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28
2.2.1.7 Atef Crown. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30
2.2.1.8 HmHm-Crown. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31
2.2.1.9 Geb Crown. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33
2.2.1.10 Double and Quadruple Feather Crowns. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34
2.2.1.11 Crowns with a Large Central Disk and Flanking Solar Attributes . . . . . . . 37
2.2.1.12 Composite Crowns with Central Rush or White Crowns. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38
2.2.1.13 Summary of Royal Headgear. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40
2.2.2 Royal Beard. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42
2.2.3 Royal Attire. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43
2.2.3.1 Short Skirt with Triangular Projection. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44
2.2.3.2 Short, Tight-Fitting Skirt. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47
2.2.3.3 Shendyt-Skirt. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50
2.2.3.4 Long Skirts. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51
2.2.3.5 Corset. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52
2.3 The Queen . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52
2.4 Goddesses. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 55
2.4.1 The Local Leonine Goddess(es): Repit and the Eye of Horus. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 57
2.4.2 The Local Human-Headed Goddesses: Isis and Aperetset. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 58
2.5 Gods. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 60
2.5.1 Min(-Re) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 64
2.6 Divine Offspring. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 68
2.6.1 Kolanthes. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 69
VI Table of Contents
Conclusion. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 415
List of Abbreviations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 421
Bibliography. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 427
Index. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 449
Plates. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 475
Preface
This book is a revised version of my Ph.D. dissertation, which was successfully defended at
the Johns Hopkins University on the 29th of June 2022. In completing this project, I have
benefited from the guidance and support of many people. First and foremost, I want to thank
my doctoral advisor, Betsy Bryan, who accepted me into the world of Egyptology. I have
benefited from her expertise in countless ways, and I am indebted to her for introducing me
to art history as an analytical lens. It was because of her recommendation that I was able
to join the Athribis temple project team, and I am deeply grateful for her belief in me and
her guidance along the way. I also want to thank my secondary advisor, Richard Jasnow. I
benefited greatly from his vast knowledge of Greco-Roman Egypt and his many helpful bib-
liographic recommendations. He also generously instructed me in Ptolemaic hieroglyphs as
an independent study, which has been crucial for my research. Additionally, I want to thank
the remaining members of my dissertation committee, Jacob Lauinger, Karen ní Mheallaigh,
and Christian Leitz, for their probing questions and insightful discussion of my work, which
has contributed to the quality of this revised manuscript. I am also grateful for the financial
support I received from the Johns Hopkins University Near Eastern Studies Department and
for the Provost Office’s Covid-19 Dissertation Completion Award, which have helped me see
this project through to completion.
Moreover, I am indebted to Christian Leitz for inviting me to join the Athribis project team
and for entrusting me with the art historical study of the Repit temple. He also graciously al-
lowed me to consult his unpublished translations of the Repit temple texts, which now appear
as volume VII of the Athribis temple publication series. His translations and commentary were
an invaluable resource and greatly expedited my own research. I also want to thank him for
the opportunity to publish this monograph in his series Studien zur spätägyptischen Religion.
Additionally, I am grateful for the financial support I received from the Athribis project, which
allowed me to conduct two study seasons at the Repit temple. This book would not have been
possible without this intimate and prolonged access to the temple and its carved reliefs. I also
want to thank the Athribis project archaeological director, Marcus Müller, for welcoming me
to the team and for our fruitful conversations at the temple. My work has also benefited from
many illuminating conversations with Athribis conservators Lucie Pieri, Satoko Toyoda, and
Claire d’Izarny, and archaeologist, Ole Herslund. I also want to thank Jens Fetkenheuer and
the team at Harrassowitz for their editorial efforts and for guiding me through the preparation
of this manuscript for publication.
My friends and colleagues have likewise been an essential source of support. From the
Johns Hopkins Archaeological Museum, I want to thank Sanchita Balachandran, who was
always there to provide much needed words of encouragement and to put what felt like in-
surmountable obstacles into sharp perspective, and Kate Gallagher, who answered my many
technical questions about database design. From the Johns Hopkins Near Eastern Studies
Department, I also want to thank Lingxin Zhang, Jill Waller, and Morgan Moroney for their
willingness to listen to my ideas and to share advice and inspiration.
Finally, this book would not have been possible without the steadfast support of my family.
My husband, Benjamin Bledsoe, has been by my side through the entire process, celebrating
XIV Preface
each milestone and comforting me through each setback. He was always there to reassure
me and to listen to my harebrained ideas, and I am sure he now knows more about the Repit
temple than many Egyptologists (whether he likes it or not). Our dogs, Cleopatra Selene (in
memoriam) and Nova Rae, have also contributed in their own special ways. I am eternally
grateful for the support of my parents, Robert Swaney and Debby O’Neil. As I considered
the contributions of the Repit temple builders and decorators, my father was never far from
my mind, as growing up I had witnessed first-hand the beautiful buildings that took shape
through the precise work of his skillful hands. My mother fostered my interest in ancient
Egypt throughout my adolescence, and it was our first trip to Egypt in 2010 that cemented my
determination to study Egyptology. I also want to thank my sisters, Jasmine Lamb and Cara
Swaney, for always believing in me and encouraging me when I needed it most.
I am grateful for the incredible guidance and support I have received from each of these
extraordinary scholars, mentors, colleagues, friends, and family. I could not have completed
this book without you.
Ptolemaic-era iconography is also increasingly complex and multivalent, which has of-
ten hampered studies of its precise modes of visual meaning-making.5 Iconographic studies
frequently assess individual elements—often various crowns and headdresses—rather than
considering how different iconographic features combine to create particular, context-driven
constellations of meaning. On the other hand, given the large quantity of material, studies that
do consider multiple iconographic attributes can become descriptive rather than interpretive.6
There are also numerous studies focused on evaluating the core theological and mythological
meanings of individual ritual scene types;7 however, a scene’s value—the way its particular
visual and textual nuances contribute to a larger theological reality—is dependent on its pre-
cise contextual relationships within a larger decorative program.8 In this vein, there are also
notable studies analyzing the decorative programs of particular Ptolemaic- and Roman-era
temple room types.9 Yet, these studies typically take a more comprehensive approach to dis-
cern these rooms’ characteristic, supraregional architectural forms, decoration, and functions,
of which art historical considerations typically play only a minor role. Studies of Ptolemaic
temples also rarely engage with the technical aspects of art production, taking the finished
product as self-evident rather than considering the contributions of the individuals responsi-
ble for its planning and execution and their impact on the finished scenes and their various
components.
To contribute to this area of study, the present volume endeavors to look at an ancient
Egyptian temple through the eyes of its designers, considering how the collective decisions
of the priests, scribes, sculptors, painters, and gilders came together to craft in stone a com-
plex mythological reality. As a case study, I examine a late Ptolemaic-era temple located at
the ancient site of Athribis in Upper Egypt. Built by Ptolemy XII Neos Dionysos (ca. 80-58
and 55-51 BCE), this temple is one of the last great monuments of the Ptolemies, and it has
only recently been fully excavated and published.10 The temple is dedicated to the relatively
little-known leonine goddess, Repit, and is unique both in terms of its architecture and its
decorative program, leaving many questions about its function and the motivations of its local
designers unanswered. To address some of these unresolved issues, I take an art historical
approach, with the broader aim of assessing the different ways images materialize the temple’s
local theology. Given the methodological issues outlined above, I combine a more traditional
study of the Repit temple’s decorative program with an analysis of its production, considering
overall trends in art-making and visual meaning-making at the temple as a whole as well as
the specific, context-driven meanings of individual images and scenes and their means of pro-
5 For an overview of the historical development of studies of Ptolemaic temple iconography, see Richter 2016,
66-70.
6 For example, Vassilika (1989) creates a useful catalog of individual iconographic elements and their co-oc-
currences at Ptolemaic Philae, but she does not meaningfully interpret these identified “patterns.” Richter’s
(2016) study of the iconographic elements in the Per-wer at Dendera is a notable exception to these decon-
textualizing studies.
7 For example, Amer 1986, 17-24 (hAd rt-bracelets); Daumas 1975, 102-109 (rrm-vessels); Derchain 1955, 225-
287 (crown of justification); Eldamaty 1997, 51-54 (golden falcon); Elwart 2015, 109-121 (sistra); Husson
1977 (mirrors); Kinnaer 1991, 73-99 (mekes/i my t - p r); el-Kordy 1982, 195-222 (eye paint); el-Kordy 1986,
441-452 (mAH-crown of gold); Plas 1989, 4-35 (seeing the god); Ryhiner 1986 (lotus); Teeter 1997 (ma’at);
Stroot-Kiraly 1989, 157-160 (white bread); Junker 1911, 69-77 (burnt offerings); Egberts 1995 (meret-chest/
driving the calves); Sternberg-El Hotabi 1992 (menu-drink/wine); Sambin 1988 (w nSb). For additional ex-
amples, see also Richter 2016, 69, n. 239.
8 For examples of these more contextualizing studies, see Labrique 1992; Leitz 2001.
9 For example, Coppens 2007 (wabet complex); Baumann 2018 (treasury); Gaber 2009 (central hall).
10 For the excavation history of the Repit temple, see section 1.4 below.
1.1 Overview of the Repit Temple 3
duction within each architectural space. While this analysis is in dialog with more traditional
studies of Ptolemaic temples centered on the “temple grammar,” I foreground the contextual
aspect of this approach to assess how the designers actively employ three-dimensional visual
relationships to create constellations of meaning that actualize the Repit temple’s cosmologi-
cal foundations.
the eastern side, an antechamber (E1) gives access to a wabet complex—consisting of an open
court (E2) and elevated chapel (E3)—as well as an ascending stairway (G), while to the west,
a smaller antechamber (F1) leads to a second, now-destroyed stairway (F2). Other eastern
chambers include a clothing chamber (Hwt - m nxt) (E4), treasury (abA-DfAw) (E5) (which also
gives access to a series of crypts), and an additional room to the north (E7), with a parallel,
now-destroyed northern chamber originally located to the west (F7). The naos is surrounded
on three sides by a colonnade (L1-L3) originally featuring 26 columns with composite capitals
(Y1-Y26). The eastern colonnade (L1) gives access to a large room whose decoration is most-
ly destroyed (E6), while the western colonnade (L3) provides entry to a similarly destroyed
chamber (F3) as well as a tripartite laboratory complex (F4-F6). The rear colonnade (L2) gives
access to three rear chapels of equal size (K1-K3), the westernmost of which is now destroyed.
The temple is surrounded by an exterior wall (M1-M3), with entrances on all four sides: a