specific performance
specific performance
Introduction
The Specific Relief Act, 1963 (SRA) was enacted to provide remedies to persons
whose civil or contractual rights have been violated.
One such relief provided under the act is regarding specific performance of
contracts.
The provision provides that it is mandatory for the courts to enforce Specific
Performance of Contracts.
Section 10 states that the specific performance of a contract shall be enforced by the
court subject to the provisions contained in sub-section (2) of section 11, section 14
and section 16.
This Section deals with the specific performance of part of a contract. It states that-
(1) Except as otherwise hereinafter provided in this section, the court shall not direct the
specific performance of a part of a contract.
(2) Where a party to a contract is unable to perform the whole of his part of it, but the
part which must be left unperformed be a only a small proportion to the whole in value and
admits of compensation in money, the court may, at the suit of either party, direct the
specific performance of so much of the contract as can be performed, and award
compensation in money for the deficiency.
(3) Where a party to a contract is unable to perform the whole of his part of it, and the part
which must be left unperformed either—
(a) forms a considerable part of the whole, though admitting of compensation in money;
or
(b) does not admit of compensation in money; he is not entitled to obtain a decree for
specific performance; but the court may, at the suit of the other party, direct the party in
default to perform specifically so much of his part of the contract as he can perform, if the
other party—
(i) in a case falling under clause (a), pays or has paid the agreed consideration for the
whole of the contract reduced by the consideration for the part which must be left
unperformed and, in a case, falling under clause (b) pays or has paid the consideration for
the whole of the contract without any abatement; and
(ii) in either case, relinquishes all claims to the performance of the remaining part of
the contract and all right to compensation, either for the deficiency or for the loss or
damage sustained by him through the default of the defendant.
(4) When a part of a contract which, taken by itself, can and ought to be specifically
performed, stands on a separate and independent footing from another part of the same
contract which cannot or ought not to be specifically performed, the court may direct
specific performance of the former part.
The clause (1) of Section 12 describes a general rule that court shall not grant specific
performance of a part of a contract.
The clauses (2) to (4) of Section 12, however, are exceptions to the general rule.
In B. Santoshamma v. D. Sarala (2009, the Supreme Court held that the Court may,
under Section 12 of SRA direct the party in default to perform specifically, so much
of his part of the contract, as he can perform, provided the other party pays or has
paid the consideration for the whole of the contract, reduced by the consideration for
the part which must be left unperformed.
Section 10 of SRA mentions that provisions of Section 11(2), 14, 16 of the Act must be
considered before granting specific performance.
It states that -
(1) Except as otherwise provided in this Act, the specific performance of a contract shall
be enforced when the act agreed to be done is in the performance wholly or partly of a
trust.
(2) A contract made by a trustee over his powers or in breach of trust cannot be enforced.
Limitation period for claiming relief under this provision is provided by Article 54 of
the Schedule (Periods of Limitation) under the Limitation Act, 1963 is three years
from the time fixed for completing the sale, or (where the title is accepted after the
time fixed for completion) the date of the acceptance.
(a) where a party to the contract has obtained substituted performance of contract in
accordance with the provisions of section 20.
(b) a contract, the performance of which involves the performance of a continuous duty
which the court cannot supervise.
(c) a contract which is so dependent on the personal qualifications of the parties that the
court cannot enforce specific performance of its material terms.
(a) who has obtained substituted performance of contract under section 20; or
(b) who has become incapable of performing, or violates any essential term of, the
contract that on his part remains to be performed, or acts in fraud of the contract, or
wilfully acts at variance with, or in subversion of, the relation intended to be established by
the contract; or
(c) who fails to prove that he has performed or has always been ready and willing to
perform the essential terms of the contract which are to be performed by him, other than
terms the performance of which has been prevented or waived by the defendant.
(i) where a contract involves the payment of money, it is not essential for the plaintiff
to actually tender to the defendant or to deposit in court any money except when so
directed by the court;
(ii) the plaintiff must prove performance of, or readiness and willingness to perform,
the contract according to its true construction.