0% found this document useful (0 votes)
2 views

Doctrine of Basic Structure 2

Uploaded by

Kumari Debnath
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
2 views

Doctrine of Basic Structure 2

Uploaded by

Kumari Debnath
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

Mains Practice Question

Q. What do you understand by 'Doctrine of Basic Structure'? Discuss its evolution and significance in
strengthening democracy. (250 words)

05 Feb, 2019 GS Paper 2 Polity & Governance

Approach:

Explain the meaning of doctrine of basic structure in introduction.


Trace the evolution of this doctrine.
Give significance of it in strengthening the democracy in India.

Introduction

'Doctrine of Basic Structure': It was propounded by the Indian Judiciary on 24th April 1973 in
Keshavananda Bharati case to put a limitation on the amending powers of the Parliament so that
the ‘basic structure of the basic law of the land’ cannot be amended in exercise of its ‘constituent
power’ under the Constitution.
Basic structure though is not exactly defined but through its contents which have been provided by
the judicature clarifies a scope defining the frame or the structure of the constitution. Some of its
constituents are Rule of law, Sovereignty, liberty and republic nature of Indian polity, judicial
review, Separation of power, secularism, and Republic nature of India etc.

Body

The development history of the doctrine of basic structure can be divided into following stages:

Sankari Prasad judgement 1951: Initially judiciary was of the view that the amendment power
of the parliament is unrestricted because it can amend any part of the constitution, even the
Article-368 which provides the power to amend to the parliament
Golak Nath V State of Punjab 1967: The Supreme Court adopted a new vision to see the
powers of parliament that it cannot amend the Part III of the constitution i.e Fundamental rights
and thus awarded fundamental rights a “Transcendental Position”.
Keshavanada Bharti V State of Kerala 1973: It gave birth to the landmark judgement which
pronounced that the parliaments cannot alter or disturb the basic structure of the constitution. It
was held that, however, the parliament has unfettered power to amend the constitution but it
cannot disturb or emasculate the basic structure or fundamental features of the constitution as it
has only the power of amendment and not of re-writing constitution.
In Indira Nehru Gandhi v. Raj Narain and Minerva Mills v. Union of India, Constitution
Benches of the Supreme Court used the basic structure doctrine to strike down the 39th
Amendment and parts of the 42nd Amendment respectively, and paved the way for restoration of
Indian democracy.The Supreme Court’s position on constitutional amendments laid out in its
judgement is that Parliament can amend the Constitution but cannot destroy its “basic structure”.

Significance in strengthening democracy

Protection from authoritarian regime: It certainly saved Indian democracy from degenerating
into authoritarian regime.
Independence of judiciary: It strengthens our democracy by delineating a true separation of
power where Judiciary is independent of other two organs. It has also given immense untold
unbridled power to Supreme Court and made it the most powerful court in the world
Citizenship rights: It, by restraining the amending powers of legislative organ of State, provides
basic Rights to Citizens which no organ of State can overrule. These rights are called Fundamental
Rights.
Being dynamic in nature, it is more progressive and open to changes in time unlike the rigid nature
of earlier judgements.

Conclusion

Even though judiciary never gave a solid test to discover what basic structure is, it however, has acted as
a brake to the legislative enthusiasm of Parliament, thereby preserving the original ideals envisioned by
the constitution-makers and strengthening the democracy.

PDF Refernece URL: https://www.drishtiias.com/mains-practice-question/question-123/pnt

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy