Basic Structure Doctrine
Basic Structure Doctrine
The doctrine was first clearly articulated by the Supreme Court of India in the Kesavananda Bharati
v. State of Kerala (1973) case. In this landmark judgment, a 13-judge bench ruled (by a 7-6 majority)
that:
Parliament has wide powers to amend the Constitution, but it cannot alter or destroy its 'basic
structure'.
The doctrine is not explicitly mentioned in the Constitution. Instead, it has evolved through judicial
interpretation. The Supreme Court has held that the following elements form part of the basic
structure:
2. Rule of law
3. Separation of powers
4. Judicial review
5. Federalism
6. Secularism
These elements are illustrative, not exhaustive. The Supreme Court decides what forms the basic
Basic Structure Doctrine of the Indian Constitution
- Limits Parliamentary power: It acts as a check on the power of Parliament to amend the
Constitution.
- Preserves democracy: It ensures that the core principles of the Constitution remain intact,
- Ensures judicial supremacy: It reinforces the role of the judiciary as the guardian of the
Constitution.
1. Shankari Prasad (1951) and Sajjan Singh (1965) - Initially held that Parliament had the power to
2. Golak Nath v. State of Punjab (1967) - Ruled that Parliament could not amend Fundamental
Rights.
3. Kesavananda Bharati (1973) - Introduced the Basic Structure Doctrine, balancing parliamentary
4. Indira Gandhi v. Raj Narain (1975) - Declared that judicial review and democracy are part of the
basic structure.
5. Minerva Mills v. Union of India (1980) - Strengthened the doctrine by reaffirming limits on
Conclusion
preserves the identity and philosophy of the Constitution, ensuring that amendments do not