Judiciary in India

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 1

**Supreme Court**: Apex court of the country,

binding decisions.

**High Courts**: State-level judiciary, appellate


**Levels of Courts**
jurisdiction.

**Subordinate Courts**: District and session courts


1. **Structure of the Judiciary** for local matters.

Higher courts' decisions bind lower courts.


**Integrated System**
**Appellate System**: Allows appeal to higher
courts for unsatisfactory lower court 
judgments.

Between citizens.

**Dispute Resolution** Between government and citizens.

Between states or center and states.

Ensures laws comply with the Constitution.


2. **Key Roles of the Judiciary** **Judicial Review**
Strikes down unconstitutional laws.

Protects citizens' rights.


**Enforcement of Fundamental Rights**
Accessible to all via the Supreme Court or High

Court.

Judiciary is independent of legislature and


**Separation of Powers**
executive.

Judges appointed with minimal interference.


3. **Independence of Judiciary** **Appointment and Removal**
Difficult to remove once appointed.

Prevents misuse of power.


**Significance**
Ensures impartial justice. 

**Incident** Sudha Goel burned due to dowry demands.

Convicted husband, mother-in-law, and


**Trial Court**
brother-in-law with death penalty.

**High Court** Overturned the conviction, citing accidental fire.


**Judiciary in India** **4.1 State (Delhi Administration) vs Laxman
Kumar and Others (1985)** Reinstated conviction for husband and mother-
in-law with life imprisonment.
**Supreme Court**
Acquitted brother-in-law for lack of evidence.

Highlighted the appellate system.


**Impact**
Sparked public outcry against dowry deaths.

Eviction of pavement dwellers and slum


**Issue**
residents.

Right to Livelihood is part of the **Right to


Life** under Article 21.
**4.2 Olga Tellis vs Bombay Municipal
4. **Significant Cases** Corporation (1985)**
**Judgment**
Eviction without alternative housing violates
fundamental rights.

Landmark case for urban poor and housing


**Impact**
rights.

Early 1980s: Made judiciary accessible to


**Introduction**
marginalized groups.

PIL by People’s Union of Civil Liberties during


drought.

Supreme Court recognized Right to Food under


**4.3 Public Interest Litigation (PIL)** **Key Example** **Right to Food Case (2001)**:
**Right to Life**.

Mandated mid-day meals in schools and


cheaper food through ration shops.

Enabled collective justice for large-scale issues.


**Impact**
Simplified filing processes. 

Costly and complex procedures.

**Access to Justice** Long delays in case resolution.

Example: **Hashimpura Massacre Case** took 31


5. **Challenges to Judiciary** years for a verdict.

Significant vacancies at various levels.


**Shortage of Judges**
Affects efficiency and speed of justice delivery.

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy