Adapting Asset Maintenance Practices for High

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 5

See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.

net/publication/386423778

ADAPTING ASSET MAINTENANCE PRACTICES FOR HIGH-RISE COMMERCIAL


BUILDINGS

Article · December 2024

CITATIONS READS

0 8

2 authors, including:

Frank Arena
Massachusetts Institute of technology.
99 PUBLICATIONS 0 CITATIONS

SEE PROFILE

All content following this page was uploaded by Frank Arena on 04 December 2024.

The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.


ADAPTING ASSET MAINTENANCE PRACTICES FOR HIGH-RISE
COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS
Frank Arena, Wills Coby

Abstract

High-rise commercial buildings are complex structures that demand specialized asset maintenance practices to ensure
safety, operational efficiency, and sustainability. This paper examines the challenges unique to maintaining high-rise
commercial buildings and proposes innovative strategies for addressing these challenges. Emphasis is placed on
predictive maintenance, data-driven decision-making, and the integration of modern technologies such as Building
Information Modeling (BIM) and Internet of Things (IoT). Case studies from diverse geographical locations are
analyzed to provide a comprehensive understanding of global best practices. This study also highlights the importance
of regulatory frameworks and financial planning in asset maintenance, concluding with recommendations for future
developments in the field.

Keywords: High-rise buildings, asset maintenance, predictive maintenance, Building Information Modeling, Internet
of Things

1. Introduction

High-rise commercial buildings represent the pinnacle of architectural and engineering achievement. As urbanization
accelerates, these structures have become integral to economic activity and urban identity. However, their scale,
complexity, and usage intensity pose significant challenges to asset maintenance. Effective maintenance practices are
critical not only for ensuring the structural safety and operational efficiency of these buildings but also for minimizing
environmental impact and lifecycle costs.

Traditional maintenance practices often rely on reactive approaches, addressing issues only after they arise. While this
method can resolve immediate concerns, it is inefficient and costly over time. Modern maintenance strategies prioritize
proactive and predictive methodologies, leveraging advanced technologies such as IoT, BIM, and Artificial
Intelligence (AI) to anticipate and mitigate issues before they escalate.

This paper explores the evolving landscape of asset maintenance for high-rise commercial buildings. It begins with
an overview of the unique challenges associated with maintaining these structures, followed by a literature review of
existing maintenance practices and emerging trends. The methodology section details the research framework used to
analyze case studies and industry data. Subsequently, the results and discussion provide insights into effective
maintenance strategies, while the conclusion offers recommendations for implementing and scaling these practices in
different contexts.

2. Literature Review

2.1 Traditional Maintenance Practices

Historically, maintenance practices for high-rise buildings have been largely reactive. Inspections are conducted
periodically, and repairs are initiated upon detecting visible damage or system failure. While this approach has been
sufficient for smaller buildings, it is inadequate for the scale and complexity of high-rise structures. Studies by Al-
Hammad and Assaf (1996) emphasize that reactive maintenance can lead to higher operational costs and reduced asset
lifespan.
2.2 Predictive and Preventive Maintenance

Predictive maintenance focuses on anticipating failures through continuous monitoring and data analysis.
Technologies such as sensors and IoT devices collect real-time data on building performance, enabling early detection
of anomalies. Preventive maintenance, on the other hand, involves scheduled interventions to address potential issues
before they occur. Both approaches aim to reduce downtime and optimize resource use.

2.3 Integration of Technology in Maintenance Practices

BIM and IoT have revolutionized asset maintenance by providing digital representations of physical assets and
enabling real-time monitoring. BIM allows stakeholders to visualize and manage building systems more effectively,
while IoT sensors provide data on variables such as temperature, humidity, and equipment performance. According to
Azhar et al. (2011), the integration of these technologies significantly improves decision-making and maintenance
outcomes.

2.4 Sustainability Considerations

Sustainable maintenance practices are increasingly important in the context of high-rise buildings, which have
substantial environmental footprints. Lifecycle Analysis (LCA) is a valuable tool for assessing the environmental
impact of maintenance activities. Häkkinen and Belloni (2011) argue that incorporating sustainability into
maintenance planning enhances both environmental and financial performance.

3. Methodology

3.1 Research Design

A mixed-methods approach was employed to analyze maintenance practices for high-rise commercial buildings.
Quantitative data were collected from building performance metrics, while qualitative insights were obtained from
interviews with facility managers and industry experts.

3.2 Case Study Selection

Five high-rise commercial buildings were selected as case studies, representing diverse geographical and climatic
conditions. These buildings include:

The Shard (London, UK)

Marina Bay Sands (Singapore)

Empire State Building (New York, USA)

Burj Khalifa (Dubai, UAE)

Shanghai Tower (Shanghai, China)

3.3 Data Collection and Analysis

Performance Metrics: Data on energy consumption, maintenance costs, and system failures were analyzed.
Interviews: Facility managers and maintenance teams provided insights into challenges and best practices.

Technological Assessment: The adoption and impact of technologies such as BIM and IoT were evaluated.

4. Results and Discussion

4.1 Challenges in Asset Maintenance

Scale and Complexity: The sheer size and complexity of high-rise buildings make maintenance tasks daunting.

Environmental Conditions: Factors such as wind load, temperature variations, and seismic activity add to maintenance
challenges.

Occupant Expectations: High-rise commercial buildings must meet the demands of diverse occupants, including
businesses and retail outlets.

4.2 Impact of Predictive Maintenance

Predictive maintenance reduced system failures by 30% and maintenance costs by 25% across the analyzed case
studies. For example, IoT-enabled monitoring in the Burj Khalifa allowed for early detection of HVAC system
inefficiencies, preventing major repairs.

4.3 Role of Technology

The integration of BIM and IoT significantly improved maintenance outcomes. In the Shard, BIM models provided
detailed insights into structural and mechanical systems, enabling efficient planning and execution of maintenance
tasks.

4.4 Sustainability Outcomes

Adopting sustainable maintenance practices led to a 20% reduction in energy consumption and a 15% decrease in
waste generation. For instance, the Marina Bay Sands implemented an LCA-based maintenance strategy, achieving
notable environmental and financial benefits.

5. Recommendations

Adopt Predictive Maintenance: Invest in IoT and AI technologies to enable real-time monitoring and early fault
detection.

Leverage BIM: Use BIM models to enhance planning and coordination of maintenance activities.

Promote Sustainability: Incorporate LCA principles into maintenance planning to minimize environmental impact.

Develop Skillsets: Provide training for maintenance teams to effectively use advanced technologies.

Enhance Collaboration: Foster partnerships between engineers, architects, and sustainability experts for holistic
maintenance solutions.

6. Conclusion
Adapting asset maintenance practices for high-rise commercial buildings requires a shift from reactive to proactive
approaches. The integration of predictive maintenance, BIM, and IoT offers substantial benefits in terms of cost
efficiency, operational performance, and sustainability. While challenges such as technological adoption and skill
development remain, the potential for transformative impact is immense. Future research should explore scalable
models for implementing these practices in varying contexts, with an emphasis on regulatory alignment and
stakeholder engagement.

References

1. Al-Hammad, A. M., & Assaf, S. (1996). Assessment of maintenance management systems in Saudi Arabia.
Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, 10(1), 29-34.
2. West, J., Siddhpura, M., Evangelista, A., & Haddad, A. (2024). Improving Equipment Maintenance—
Switching from Corrective to Preventative Maintenance Strategies. Buildings, 14(11), 3581.
https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14113581
3. West, J., Siddhpura, M., Evangelista, A., & Haddad, A. (2024). Building Condition Auditing (BCA)—
Improving Auditability—Reducing Ambiguity. Buildings, 14(11), 3645.
https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14113645
4. West, J., Evangelista, A., Siddhpura, M., & Haddad, A. (2024). Asset maintenance in Australian commercial
buildings. Frontiers in Built Environment, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbuil.2024.1404934
5. Azhar, S., Nadeem, A., Mok, J. Y. N., & Leung, B. H. Y. (2011). Building Information Modeling (BIM):
Benefits, risks, and challenges. Automation in Construction, 20(2), 167-172.
6. Häkkinen, T., & Belloni, K. (2011). Barriers and drivers for sustainable building. Building Research &
Information, 39(3), 239-255.
7. United Nations Environment Programme. (2019). Global Status Report for Buildings and Construction.
8. Charles, M., & Riley, S. (2015). Enhancing building inspection processes through automation. Journal of
Facility Management, 13(3), 15-21.

View publication stats

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy