healthcare paper
healthcare paper
healthcare paper
Health care systems around the world vary in their ability to provide high-quality services,
ensure equitable access, and manage resources efficiently. The structure and policies guiding
health care delivery in different nations are a reflection of their political, economic, and social
priorities. As global comparisons of health systems become increasingly common, countries can
learn from each other and adopt practices that improve overall health outcomes. The system can
equity, and health care outcomes—which help recognize the areas for improvement
(Commonwealth Fund, 2021). This paper will explore these five dimensions and assess how
different countries rank in terms of health care access, focusing on what these rankings reveal
To accurately compare health care systems, it is essential to define the five key dimensions that
1. Care Process: This dimension refers to how effectively health care services are delivered
coordination of care (Commonwealth Fund, 2021) . Effective care processes ensure that
patients receive timely, safe, and appropriate interventions, which improve overall health
outcomes.
2
2. Access: The access dimension evaluates how easily individuals can obtain health care
services when needed. It includes factors such as affordability, insurance coverage, and
with high access ensures that individuals, regardless of socioeconomic background, can
seek treatment without significant barriers, such as high costs or long waiting periods.
care system operations. This includes how well resources are managed, the extent to
which bureaucracy hinders or facilitates care, and the time patients must wait for
services. Efficient systems reduce unnecessary paperwork, ensure that patients are seen
quickly, and optimize the use of health care resources (Commonwealth Fund, 2021).
4. Equity: Equity in health care means that all individuals have equal access to health
Fund, 2021). This dimension highlights disparities in health care access and outcomes
among different population groups. A highly equitable system ensures that care is
5. Health Care Outcomes: Health care outcomes measure the results of health
interventions, focusing on overall population health, patient survival rates, and quality of
life (Commonwealth Fund, 2021). Systems with good outcomes help to improve the
general well-being of the population by reducing mortality rates, preventing diseases, and
Access is especially important among these five dimensions as it decides if individuals can
actively seek and receive timely care. A health care system may have excellent processes or
outcomes, but if people cannot access those services due to financial or logistical barriers, those
advantages are meaningless. Access ensures that health care is inclusive and available to
everyone who needs it, playing a fundamental role in the overall effectiveness of a health system.
The 2021 Commonwealth Fund report indicates that Norway has the best access to healthcare
services. Norway’s success in this dimension is largely due to its universal health care system,
which provides comprehensive coverage for all citizens and legal residents. Norway offers a
single-payer system in which the government ensures that everyone has access to necessary
medical care, with minimal out-of-pocket expenses for patients (Tikkanen et al., 2020). This
system allows Norway to eliminate many of the financial barriers to care, ensuring that cost is
not a prohibitive factor for those seeking treatment. In addition, the country has a well-
distributed network of hospitals and primary care centers, making health services readily
available across both urban and rural areas (Tikkanen et al., 2020). By offering care that is
affordable and geographically accessible, Norway ensures that its population enjoys high levels
In contrast, the United States ranks lowest in terms of access. The U.S. health care system
struggles with accessibility, despite having some of the most advanced medical technologies and
treatments in the world. A key reason for this is the lack of universal health coverage, which
leaves millions of Americans uninsured or underinsured (Commonwealth Fund, 2021). For those
without adequate insurance, the cost of medical care can be prohibitively high, resulting in
delayed or skipped treatments. Even individuals with insurance often face high deductibles and
co-payments, further limiting their ability to access necessary care (Commonwealth, 2021). The
4
article also states that geographical distribution of health care services also contributes to the
issue, with rural populations facing significant barriers in accessing specialized medical care.
This combination of high costs and uneven service distribution explains the U.S.’s low ranking in
The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA), commonly known as the Affordable
Care Act (ACA), was enacted in 2010 to tackle key challenges in the American healthcare
system, such as accessibility and cost (Rosenbaum, 2011). Two key components of the ACA
have significantly impacted health care in the U.S. over the past decade.
One of the most significant aspects of the Affordable Care Act is the provision that mandates
insurance companies to permit young adults to be covered by their parents' health insurance
plans until they reach the age of 26.(ASPE, 2015). This policy was implemented to reduce the
uninsured rate among young adults, a group that was historically less likely to have health
insurance coverage. Since the law was enacted, this provision has remained unchanged and
continues to benefit millions of youth. According to the U.S. Department of Health and Human
Services, more than 2.3 million young adults gained health insurance through this provision,
reducing the uninsured rate for this age group by nearly half (ASPE, 2015). By allowing young
adults to stay on their parents' plans, the ACA has ensured that a critical demographic group
maintains access to health services during a time when they are often transitioning between
The Medicaid expansion is another significant component of the ACA. The law expanded
Medicaid eligibility to include individuals and families earning up to 138% of the federal poverty
level, with the goal of providing health coverage to more low-income Americans
(Commonwealth Fund, 2023). States were given the option to expand Medicaid, and as of today,
39 states have chosen to do so (HealthMarkets, 2023). This expansion has had a profound impact
on access to care for millions of low-income individuals, with an estimated 15 million people
gaining coverage through Medicaid since the ACA was implemented (Commonwealth Fund,
2023). However, 11 states have opted not to expand Medicaid, which has left a coverage gap for
many low-income residents in those states. While the expansion has been a major success in
states that adopted it, the lack of nationwide implementation has contributed to ongoing
Conclusion
After examining different aspects of healthcare in the United States and other countries, it is
evident that the United States encounters major difficulties in terms of accessibility and fairness.
The PPACA has taken steps to tackle some of these issues, especially through measures such as
expanding Medicaid and permitting young adults to remain on their parents' insurance policies.
In my opinion, although the PPACA represents progress, further action is necessary to guarantee
that all Americans have access to affordable healthcare. I have seen firsthand how challenging it
can be for individuals without insurance or with inadequate coverage to receive the care they
need. While I support the continued expansion of health care coverage through policies like the
ACA, I also believe that more comprehensive reforms are necessary to address the underlying
issues of cost and access in the U.S. health care system. Overall, the current direction of health
References
The Commonwealth Fund. (2021, August 4). Mirror, mirror 2021: Reflecting poorly.
Commonwealth Fund.
https://www.commonwealthfund.org/publications/fund-reports/2021/aug/mirror-mirror-2021-
reflecting-poorly#:~:text=Key%20Findings:%20The%20top%2Dperforming,children%20and
%20working%2Dage%20adults.
The Commonwealth Fund. (2023, September 11). Impact of the Medicaid coverage gap:
Comparing states that have and have not expanded eligibility. Impact Medicaid Coverage Gap:
https://www.commonwealthfund.org/publications/issue-briefs/2023/sep/impact-medicaid-
coverage-gap-comparing-states-have-and-have-not#:~:text=A%20key%20provision%20of
%20the%20Affordable%20Care,138%20percent%20of%20the%20federal%20poverty
%20level.&text=As%20.
Health Markets. (2022, December 19). Affordable care act changes for 2023. Affordable Care
Rosenbaum, S. (2011, January). The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act: Implications
for Public Health Policy and Practice. Public health reports (Washington, D.C. : 1974).
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3001814/#:~:text=The%20Patient
7
%20Protection%20and%20Affordable%20Care%20Act1%20(hereinafter%20referred,series
%20of%20crucial%20intermediate%20steps.
Tikkanen, R., Osborn, R., Mossialos, E., Djordjevic, A., & Wharton, G. A. (2020, June 5).
https://www.commonwealthfund.org/international-health-policy-center/countries/
norway#:~:text=Norway%20has%20universal%20health%20coverage,greater%20choice%20of
%20private%20providers.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2015, September 21). Health insurance
coverage-affordable-care-act-0#:~:text=2.3%20million%20additional%20young%20adults
%20(aged%2019%2D25),on%20a%20parent’s%20plan%20until%20age%2026.