Effect of Attention Based
Effect of Attention Based
Effect of Attention Based
, RJPT 2024;4(3):21-28
Journal of Physiotherapy
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Abstract
Background / Aim: Fall related injuries in elderly population are one of the most disabling
predicaments, particularly in the age group of 60-70 years. Postural restoration, therefore, is one of
the major concerns demanding attention in elderly individuals with balance impairments. This study
aimed to determine the effect of attention focussed balance interventions in improving balance and
reducing the risk of falling in female elderly population.
Methods: In this experimental interventional study, 54 subjects in the age range of
60-70 years, with age related balance impairments were recruited from an old age home using
purposive sampling technique with the set inclusion and exclusion criteria. Group A (n=27)
(Experimental group) received attention-based balance exercise intervention for five days/week,
for a total duration of 12 weeks and Group B (n=27) (Control group) received normal mobility
training for five days / week for 12 weeks. Outcome measures included Berg balance scale and John
Hopkins Fall Risk Assessment Tool.
Results: Results after statistical analysis within and between groups indicated that Group A subjects
highly benefitted from the attention focussed intervention provided to them for 12 weeks duration
(36.37-47.26). In Group B, though a significant difference was noted in the balance of individuals,
changes were less compared to the experimental group with a t value of -16.480 and a P value of
0.000.
Conclusion: Application of a component of cognition i.e., attention along with balance exercises can
rectify the balance impairments and reduce the risk of falls in this population.
Keywords: Focused attention training, Postural stability, Risk factors for falls, Aging population,
Health outcomes in aging
21
Anusha
ArunimaASBhat et RJPT
et al., al., RJPT
2024;4(3):21-28
2024;4(1):
22
Arunima S et al.,
... etRJPT
al., RJPT
2024;4(3):21-28
2023;3(1):
Duration of study: Approximately 12 weeks. 7. Back leg rises with and without support
Follow up: Subjects were assessed for study outcome 8. Walking on heels
measures i.e. Berg Balance Scale and FRAT (fall Risk
9. Walking on toes
Assessment Tool).
10. Walking heel to toe
Materials: Demographic data sheet, stopwatch, two
standard chairs (with reasonable height), one with 11. Forward stepping
armrest and one without, aerobic stepper or a stool (with The exercise prescription was formulated following
average step height), air filled ball, chalk 32, 15 ft walk- the ACSM (American College of Sports Medicine)
way with markers, and an informed consent form. guidelines, adhering to the FITT (Frequency, Intensity,
Methods Time, and Type) protocol. The program included a
frequency of five days per week, an intensity level of
Phase 1 - Ethical clearance: The synopsis was
5–6 on a 0–10 scale, and a duration of 30 to 60 minutes
submitted to the Institutional research committee
per session. The prescribed type of exercise comprised
(IRC) and permission was obtained. Following this, 54
aerobic activities designed to minimize excessive
subjects were selected following the set inclusion and
cardiological or orthopedic stress. Each session
exclusion criteria from an old age home in Dakshin
concluded with a 10-minute cool-down period.
Kannada district.
Group B (Control group)
With purposive sampling method, subjects for the study
were selected and allocated into two arms (Group A and Twenty seven subjects included in Group B were
Group B). In the initial phase of the study, all subjects provided with flexible goal oriented therapy, conforming
were assessed using the Berg Balance Scale and John to existing practices of treatment for elderly with
Hopkins Fall risk assessment tool for their baseline scores mobility problems.
and then detailed information about the procedure was Treatment consisted of assisted walking within parallel
explained. Written and signed consent was taken from bars, stair practices, and transfers. Treatment schedule
all the participants recruited for the study. Subjects were concentrated on augmenting balance with emphasis on
explained about the warm up and cool down sessions, a safe gait pattern.
and the practice before and after each session.
The intervention was structured to ensure that participants
Group A (Experimental group) in this group performed aerobic exercises twice a week.
The warm up session included three exercises: The exercises were set at an intensity level of 3–4 on
a scale of 0–10, with each session lasting 20 minutes.
1. Marching in place (2 minutes)
The selected aerobic activities were carefully chosen to
2. Active static stretching of major muscles: 30 sec hold minimize stress on the cardiovascular system.
(3 rep)
After 12 weeks of intervention, all subjects were assessed
3. Active range of motion exercises for each joint using Berg Balance Scale (BBS) and John Hopkins Fall
(5 rep) Risk Assessment Tool (JHFRAT) for post-test values.
Subjects allotted to Group 1 were made to perform a set Study outcome measures
of 11 exercises targeting the static and dynamic aspects 1. Balance by Berg Balance Scale
of balance. These involved exercises that strengthen the
core and back to keep the subject upright with major 2. Fall risk by Modified Johns Hopkins FRAT (Fall Risk
focus on cognitive input. Assessment Tool)
23
...
Arunima
et al., RJPT
S et al.,
2023;3(1):
RJPT 2024;4(3):21-28
Before the intervention, the recruited participants were that participants of both the groups had a homogeneous
subjected to the balance and mobility evaluation with range of mobility or risk of fall before intervention.
intended standardized outcome measures, Berg Balance
Analysis of Parameters Within Group A after
Scale and Modified John Hopkins fall risk assessment
Intervention
tool (JHFRAT).
Analysis of pre and post balance scores (BBS)
The data collected before and after intervention were
The mean value of balance scores with BBS in Group
subjected to various statistical tests in terms of analysis
A subjects before intervention was 36.37±1.471, and
of age and study parameters. Data were also analyzed to
this increased to a value of 47.26±1.196 after the
test the hypothesis of the study.
intervention. By using paired “t” test, comparison of
This study involved a convenience sample of older above parameters resulted in a t value of 23.661 and a
women residing in an old age home in Dakshin Kannada P value of 0.000 representing a very high significance
district. Both Group A and Group B included 27 subjects in analysis. This indicated that Group A subjects highly
each, in the age group of 60-70 years. The mean age of benefitted from the attention focussed intervention
the study participants was 64 years. The mean age of provided to them for a 12 week duration.
female subjects recruited in this study was 64 years.
Analysis of pre and post fall risk scores (JHFRAT)
Group A had 27 female subjects. With the randomness in Group A (Paired sample statistics)
sample allocation, majority of the subjects (18) included
Mean value of mobility score (fall risk) for subjects
were in the age range of 60-61 years.11 subjects (i.e.,
in Group A before the intervention was 3.78±1.601,
20%) included in this group were found to be have major
and this dropped to 1.48±1.312 after the intervention.
fall risk due to aging.
Comparison of this parameter with above values using
The mean value of mobility scores assessed by JHFRAT paired t test resulted in a t value of 16.480 and a P value
in Group A participants was 3.78±1.601, while the mean of 0.000, which represented a very high significance in
value of scores in Group B participants was 1.48±1.312. analysis. This indicated that subjects in Group A trained
The comparison of above using student “t” test showed with the attention based intervention showed a positive
a P value of 0.868 which is non-significant, implying reduction in the fall risk and improvement in their
mobility skills from the 12 weeks intervention.
Group A Mean N Standard deviation Standard error mean t value Degrees of freedom P value
Pairs Mean N Standard deviation Standard error mean t value Degrees of freedom P value
24
Arunima S et al.,
... etRJPT
al., RJPT
2024;4(3):21-28
2023;3(1):
Analysis of Parameters Within Group B after Analysis of Balance Scores and Fall Risk Scores
Intervention Analysis of pre and post fall risk scores (JHFRAT)
Analysis of pre and post balance scores (BBS) Mean value of fall risk scores prior to intervention in
Group B (Paired sample statistics) subjects of Group B was 3.85±1.657 which dropped to a
Mean value of balance scores prior to intervention for mean of 2.96±2.103 following intervention. Comparison
subjects in Group B was 36.59±1.279, which increased of values with paired t test yielded a t value of 4.567
to 38.89±1.396 following intervention. Comparison of and a P value of 0.000 representing high significance
values with paired t test resulted in a t value of -16.480 according to analysis, even though with fewer subjects
and a P value of 0.000 representing high significance compared to Group A, indicating a positive effect of
according to analysis, even though with fewer subjects intervention
compared to Group A, indicating a positive effect of the
intervention.
Post BBS
equal variances 0.008 0.928 23.661 52 0.000 8.370 0.354 7.661 9.080
assumed
On analysis using the Student’s t test, a high statistical significant difference was observed in post balance scores between the groups with a P
value of 0.000 (P <0.001), indicating a positive influence on the balance of participants recruited in this 12 week study.
Table 4: Analysis of post intervention fall risk scores between Group A and Group B
Group A N Mean Standard deviation Standard error mean
1 (Post-JHF) 27 1.48 1.312 0.252
2 (Post-JHF) 27 2.96 2.103 0.405
25
...
Arunima
et al., RJPT
S et al.,
2023;3(1):
RJPT 2024;4(3):21-28
26
Arunima S et al., RJPT 2024;4(3):21-28
This dual engagement may be particularly beneficial for mobility exercises contribute to improved physical
elderly females, who often experience both cognitive function, they may not be as effective as attention-based
and physical declines with aging. The study results are training in enhancing balance and reducing fall risk.
consistent with the existing literature underscoring the
Conclusion
interconnectedness of cognitive and motor systems and
Poor health, pain, fear of falling and the risk of injury
suggests that dual-task training can lead to superior
are the most frequently mentioned factors by elderly
improvements in functional abilities.
individuals as limiting their physical activity. In
Furthermore, the statistically significant differences women, this pattern generally reflects the time pressures
observed between the groups in post-intervention BBS associated with their multiple roles at this stage of life
and JHFRAT scores underscore the efficacy of attention- and earlier. Lack of self-compassion associated with
based training. The study's use of standardized outcome age also attributes to the cause. This study concludes
measures and rigorous statistical analysis, including the that simple attention-based balance training, in early
Student’s t-test, bolsters the reliability of these findings. and moderate stage balance impairments, is fruitful
The significant P values (0.000) for both balance and and feasible among the comparatively inactive, 60-70
fall risk outcomes in Group A confirm the effectiveness year old female population. Further, this intervention
of the intervention. was found to alleviate their fear of fall to a great extent,
contributing to self-confidence, enabling them to adopt
Overall, these findings advocate the inclusion of
a physically active lifestyle during the final years of
attention-based balance training in fall prevention and
their life.
rehabilitation programs for the elderly, particularly for
women who are at a higher risk of falls. The study also Conflict of Interests
highlights the need for further research to explore the The author do not have any conflict of interest to declare.
underlying mechanisms contributing to the observed
improvements and to optimize the design of dual-task Acknowledgement
training protocols for maximum benefit. I express my heartfelt indebtness and owe a deep sense
of gratitude to my teacher and my faculty guide Prof.
The findings from this study highlight the significant L. Gladson Jose Principal, Dr M.V. Shetty College of
benefits of attention-based balance training in improving Physiotherapy and for the regular advice, magnitude
balance and reducing fall risk among elderly females. of dynamic and untiresome guidance, suggestion
The intervention group (Group A), which received and encouragement throughout the course of present
specific attention-focused exercises, showed remarkable research.
improvements in balance, as indicated by the increase
I would like to express my sincere thanks to all the
in Berg Balance Scale (BBS) scores from 36.37 to
respectable staff members of Dr M.V. Shetty College
47.26 post-intervention. Similarly, the Modified John
of Physiotherapy, without their co-operation this study
Hopkins Fall Risk Assessment Tool (JHFRAT) scores
wouldn’t have been successful. I acknowledge my
demonstrated a substantial reduction in fall risk, with
sincere gratitude towards the Narayana Hrudayalaya
scores decreasing from 3.78 to 1.48. These results
Institute of Physiotherapy for providing me the time and
suggest that attention-based balance training effectively
opportunity for publishing this study.
enhances postural stability and reduces fall risk,
supporting the hypothesis that integrating cognitive References
tasks with physical exercises can optimize functional 1. Galvan V, Jin K. Neurogenesis in the aging brain.
outcomes. Clin Interv Aging 2008;2:605-610.
In contrast, the control group (Group B), which 2. Darade S, Ganvir S. Effectiveness of sensory motor
engaged in general mobility exercises, also exhibited training program in community dwelling elderly
improvements but to a lesser extent. The BBS scores in individuals with history of fall. J Physiother Rehabil
Group B increased from 36.59 to 38.89, and the JHFRAT 2017;2(2):1000139.
scores decreased from 3.85 to 2.96. While these changes 3. Peel N, Bartlett H, McClure R. Healthy ageing:
are statistically significant, they are not as pronounced How is it defined and measured? Australas J Ageing
as those observed in Group A, indicating that while 2004;23(3):115-119.
27
Arunima S et al., RJPT 2024;4(3):21-28
4. Sturnieks DL, St George R, Lord SR. Balance understanding brain function and the risk of falling.
disorders in the elderly. Neurophysiol Clin J Am Geriatr Soc 2012;60(11):2127-2136.
2008;38(6):467-78.
9. Yogev-Seligmann G, Hausdorff JM, Giladi N. The
5. Muir S, Gopaul K, Odasso M. The role of cognitive role of executive function and attention in gait. Mov
impairment in fall risk among older adults: a Disord 2008;23(3):329-342.
systematic review and meta-analysis. Age Ageing
10. Huxhold O, Li SC, Schmiedek F, et al. Dual-tasking
2012;41(3):299-308.
postural control: Aging and the effects of cognitive
6. Horak FB. Postural orientation and equilibrium: demand in conjunction with focus of attention.
What do we need to know about neural control Brain Res Bull 2006;69(3):294-305.
of balance to prevent falls? Age Ageing 2006;35
11. Wulf G, Prinz W. Directing attention to movement
(2):7-11.
effects enhances learning: A review. Psychon Bull
7. Woollacott M, Shumway-Cook A. Attention and the Rev 2001;8(4):648-660.
control of posture and gait: A review of an emerging
12. Wulf G. Attentional focus and motor learning: A
area of research. Gait Posture 2002;16(1):1-14.
review of 15 years. Int Rev Sport Exerc Psychol
8. Montero-Odasso M, Verghese J, Beauchet O, et al. 2013;6(1):77-104.
Gait and cognition: A complementary approach to
28