The document reviews the efficacy of command-and-control (CAC) and market-based instruments (MBI) for environmental regulation in developing countries, highlighting that while these policies can yield significant environmental benefits, their effectiveness is often undermined by weak regulatory capacity and enforcement challenges. It synthesizes findings from various studies, noting that both CAC and MBI policies have shown potential in improving environmental outcomes, despite data limitations and methodological difficulties in evaluating their impacts. The authors call for further rigorous evaluations to better understand the conditions under which these regulations succeed or fail in generating intended benefits.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
0 ratings0% found this document useful (0 votes)
8 views21 pages
Environmental Economics
The document reviews the efficacy of command-and-control (CAC) and market-based instruments (MBI) for environmental regulation in developing countries, highlighting that while these policies can yield significant environmental benefits, their effectiveness is often undermined by weak regulatory capacity and enforcement challenges. It synthesizes findings from various studies, noting that both CAC and MBI policies have shown potential in improving environmental outcomes, despite data limitations and methodological difficulties in evaluating their impacts. The authors call for further rigorous evaluations to better understand the conditions under which these regulations succeed or fail in generating intended benefits.