FBD
FBD
5 Computation of Reactions 69
containing one unknown each. For such structures, the reactions are
determined by solving the equations simultaneously. The analysis of
such internally unstable structures can sometimes be expedited and
the solution of simultaneous equations avoided by disconnecting the
structure into rigid portions and by applying the equations of equilib-
rium to the individual portions to determine the reactions. In such a
case, you must construct the free-body diagrams of the portions of the
structure; these diagrams must show, in addition to any applied loads
and support reactions, all the internal forces being exerted upon that
portion at connections. Remember that the internal forces acting on
the adjacent portions of a structure must have the same magnitudes
but opposite senses in accordance with Newton’s third law.
4. Apply an alternative equilibrium equation that has not been used before
to the entire structure to check the computations. This alternative equa-
tion should preferably involve all the reactions that were determined in
the analysis. You may use a moment equilibrium equation involving a
summation of moments about a point that does not lie on lines of action
of reaction forces for this purpose. If the analysis has been carried out
correctly, then this alternative equilibrium equation must be satisfied.
Example 3.2
Determine the reactions at the supports for the beam shown in Fig. 3.18(a).
FIG. 3.18
Solution
Free-Body Diagram. The free-body diagram of the beam is shown in Fig. 3.18(b). Note that the roller at A exerts reaction RA
in the direction perpendicular to the inclined supporting surface.
Static Determinacy. The beam is internally stable and is supported by three reactions, RA, Bx, and By, all of which are neither
parallel nor concurrent. Therefore, the beam is statically determinate.
continued
Section 3.5 Computation of Reactions 71
Support Reactions. Since two of the three reactions, namely Bx and By, are concurrent at B, their moments about B are zero.
Therefore, the equilibrium equation ∑ M B 5 0, which involves the summation of moments of all the forces about B, contains
only one unknown, RA. Thus,
1 ∑ MB 5 0
4
2 RA (20) 1 12 sin 60° (10) 2 6(5) 5 0
5
RA 5 4.62 k
The positive answer for RA indicates that our initial assumption about the sense of this reaction was correct. Therefore,
RA 5 4.62 k ! Ans.
Next, in order to determine Bx, we apply the equilibrium equation,
1 → ∑ Fx 5 0
3
( 4.62 ) 2 12 cos 608 1 Bx 5 0
5
Bx 5 3.23 k
Bx 5 3.23 k → Ans.
The only remaining unknown, By, can now be determined by applying the remaining equation of equilibrium:
1 ↑ ∑ Fy 5 0
4
( 4.62 ) 2 12 sin 608 1 By 2 6 5 0
5
By 512.7 k
By 512.7 k ↑ Ans.
In order to avoid having to solve simultaneous equations in the preceding computations, we applied the equilibrium equa-
tions in such a manner that each equation contained only one unknown.
Checking Computations. Finally, to check our computations, we apply an alternative equation of equilibrium (see
Fig. 3.18(b)):
4
1 ∑ MC 52 (4.62)(25) 1 12 sin 608(15) 2 12.7(5)
5
52 0.01 k-ft Checks
Example 3.3
Determine the reactions at the supports for the beam shown in Fig. 3.19(a).
Solution
Free-Body Diagram. See Fig. 3.19(b).
Static Determinacy. The beam is internally stable with r 5 3. Thus, it is statically determinate.
continued
FBD EXAMPLES
Ax
A
Ay By
Tyga
Ax
M A
Ay By
Ax
Ay BN
Ay
Bx
p
By
Ax
Ay Bx
0
b
and I
E F
Ax E F
y
Ay
1
By
A
Cy by
Ijf tf
ÉÉ to t
t
Etp
a
Ax Bx
By
not Ay
Cx
Bok
Cy
A MB
Chaya gBx
Mbta
My
Cy