Sustainable Infrastructure and Climate Change Resi
Sustainable Infrastructure and Climate Change Resi
net/publication/385287202
CITATIONS READS
0 385
1 author:
Moses Alabi
Ladoke Akintola University of Technology
69 PUBLICATIONS 5 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
All content following this page was uploaded by Moses Alabi on 27 October 2024.
Climate resilience in infrastructure involves designing and constructing assets that are
capable of withstanding extreme weather events, such as floods, hurricanes, and
heatwaves, while maintaining functionality and minimizing recovery time. Resilient
infrastructure also contributes to the long-term sustainability of communities by reducing
the vulnerability of essential services—such as transportation, energy, water supply, and
communication networks—to climate-related disruptions.
One of the core components of sustainable infrastructure is the use of green building
materials and energy-efficient technologies that reduce greenhouse gas emissions and
lower the carbon footprint of construction and operation. For example, high-performance
concrete, recycled materials, and energy-efficient design practices such as passive heating
and cooling systems contribute to reducing the environmental impact of infrastructure
projects. In addition, integrating renewable energy sources like solar, wind, and
hydropower into infrastructure systems enhances sustainability while mitigating the
contribution of infrastructure to climate change.
I. Introduction
Examples of coastal infrastructure at risk include roads, bridges, airports, and seaports,
which are essential for the movement of people, goods, and resources. Damage or
disruption to these critical facilities can have far-reaching economic and social
consequences, hampering regional and global supply chains.
Power grids, transportation networks, water supply systems, and buildings are
particularly vulnerable to the effects of extreme weather. Damage to these infrastructure
components can disrupt essential services, impact public health and safety, and result in
significant economic losses.
The increased strain on cooling infrastructure, such as air conditioning units and power
grids, can lead to service disruptions and infrastructure failures, especially during
prolonged heatwave events. Additionally, higher energy demands for cooling can
contribute to greater greenhouse gas emissions, further exacerbating the climate change
challenge.
Droughts can lead to the depletion of water resources, challenging the ability of water
supply systems to meet the demands of communities and industries. This can have severe
consequences for food security, public health, and the overall resilience of communities.
The degradation of natural resources, such as forests and vegetation, can also contribute
to the vulnerability of infrastructure, as these natural systems often play a crucial role in
stabilizing the land and mitigating the impacts of climate change.
Climate-Resilient Design
Sustainable infrastructure also prioritizes climate-resilient design, ensuring that
infrastructure systems are capable of withstanding the impacts of climate change. This
involves the incorporation of resilience measures, such as the use of adaptable, flexible,
and modular designs that can evolve with changing environmental conditions.
Infrastructure planners and designers must consider the potential effects of extreme
weather events, sea-level rise, temperature changes, and other climate-related stresses
when developing their designs. By anticipating and addressing these challenges,
infrastructure can be made more durable, reliable, and capable of maintaining critical
functions even in the face of a changing climate.
This principle emphasizes the need to address the specific needs and challenges faced by
these groups, particularly in the context of climate resilience planning. By promoting
inclusive access to infrastructure and services, sustainable infrastructure can contribute to
the overall well-being and resilience of communities.
Adaptive Infrastructure
Adaptive infrastructure refers to the design of infrastructure systems that can respond and
adapt to unpredictable climate conditions and the evolving impacts of climate change.
This principle emphasizes the need for flexibility, modularity, and the ability to modify or
upgrade infrastructure as environmental conditions change over time.
Strategies for designing adaptive infrastructure may include the use of flexible building
codes, the incorporation of modular components, and the implementation of standardized
connections that allow for easy retrofitting or expansion. This approach enables
infrastructure to be adjusted, reconfigured, or expanded to meet the changing demands
and challenges posed by climate change.
These solutions may include the integration of green roofs, urban wetlands, mangrove
planting, and other nature-based features into infrastructure planning. These natural
systems can play a critical role in flood mitigation, carbon sequestration, biodiversity
conservation, and the regulation of local microclimates.
Transportation
The transportation sector is a critical focus area for sustainable infrastructure, as it plays a
vital role in supporting economic development and social connectivity while also
contributing significantly to greenhouse gas emissions and climate change impacts.
Energy
The energy sector is undergoing a significant transformation towards sustainable
infrastructure, with a focus on the integration of renewable energy sources, such as solar,
wind, and geothermal, into the power grid.
This includes the design of eco-friendly housing, such as passive houses and net-zero
energy buildings, which can adapt to the impacts of climate change while minimizing
their environmental footprint. Urban planning that prioritizes green spaces, urban forests,
and natural drainage systems can also contribute to climate change adaptation and the
overall livability of communities.
By addressing the unique sustainability and resilience needs of these key sectors,
sustainable infrastructure can play a pivotal role in mitigating the impacts of climate
change, promoting environmental stewardship, and enhancing the overall well-being of
communities.
One prominent example is New York City, which has implemented a comprehensive
flood protection strategy after the devastation caused by Hurricane Sandy in 2012. This
includes the construction of sea walls, flood gates, and the restoration of urban wetlands
to act as natural buffers against storm surges and coastal flooding. The city has also
invested in upgrading critical infrastructure, such as power grids and transportation
systems, to withstand the effects of extreme weather events.
Another case study is Rotterdam, the Netherlands, which has a long history of addressing
flood risks. The city has implemented a comprehensive "Room for the River" program,
which involves the strategic placement of flood barriers, the creation of water storage
areas, and the relocation of vulnerable infrastructure to higher ground. These efforts have
significantly improved the city's resilience to rising sea levels and flooding.
These case studies showcase the importance of taking a holistic, proactive approach to
climate-resilient infrastructure in coastal regions, integrating both engineered solutions
and nature-based strategies to enhance the overall resilience of the built environment.
These case studies demonstrate how the strategic integration of green infrastructure can
contribute to more sustainable and climate-resilient urban environments, leveraging the
inherent strengths of natural systems to address the challenges posed by a changing
climate.
One example is the efforts in California, United States, to decentralize and diversify the
energy grid by investing in renewable energy sources, such as solar and wind power, and
the deployment of microgrid systems. These strategies have improved the grid's ability to
withstand and recover from disruptions caused by extreme weather events, such as
wildfires and severe storms.
Another case study is the ongoing work in Puerto Rico to rebuild and strengthen the
island's energy infrastructure after the devastating impact of Hurricane Maria in 2017.
The focus has been on transitioning to a more distributed, renewable-based energy system,
with the integration of microgrids and energy storage solutions. This approach has
enhanced the resilience of the energy system, reducing the risk of widespread and
prolonged power outages in the face of future climate-related disasters.
These case studies highlight the importance of diversifying energy sources, decentralizing
infrastructure, and leveraging smart technologies to create more resilient and sustainable
energy systems that can withstand the challenges posed by a changing climate.
These smart infrastructure solutions have played a crucial role in Japan's disaster
management efforts, enabling rapid and coordinated responses, minimizing the impact on
communities, and facilitating the efficient restoration of essential services in the
aftermath of disasters.
The case studies presented highlight the diverse strategies and innovative approaches that
cities, regions, and countries are taking to build climate-resilient and sustainable
infrastructure. By leveraging a range of solutions, from nature-based interventions to
smart technologies, these examples demonstrate the potential for creating infrastructure
systems that can withstand the impacts of climate change and promote long-term
sustainability.
Financial Constraints
One of the primary challenges in implementing sustainable and climate-resilient
infrastructure is the high upfront costs associated with these projects. Sustainable
infrastructure often requires the use of advanced technologies, innovative materials, and
complex design approaches, which can significantly increase the initial investment
required.
To address this challenge, there is a need for the development of innovative financing
mechanisms, such as green bonds, climate-resilient investment funds, and public-private
partnerships. These financial tools can help to mobilize the necessary resources and
incentivize the adoption of sustainable infrastructure practices.
The integration of circular economy principles into infrastructure planning and design
can contribute to the long-term sustainability of the built environment, helping to mitigate
the environmental impacts associated with traditional linear infrastructure models.
Decarbonizing Infrastructure
Another significant trend in sustainable infrastructure is the drive towards
decarbonization, which involves reducing greenhouse gas emissions associated with the
construction, operation, and maintenance of infrastructure assets.
This includes the development and adoption of low-carbon building materials, the
integration of renewable energy sources into infrastructure systems, and the
implementation of energy-efficient technologies and operational practices. Additionally,
the advancement of carbon capture and storage technologies can play a crucial role in
mitigating the carbon footprint of infrastructure projects.
By prioritizing decarbonization, the infrastructure sector can contribute to global efforts
to address climate change and transition towards a low-carbon future.
The use of artificial intelligence, machine learning, and big data analytics can enhance
the ability to forecast climate-related risks, optimize infrastructure performance, and
proactively identify and address vulnerabilities. These technologies can inform decision-
making processes, support infrastructure planning and design, and enable real-time
monitoring and adaptive management of infrastructure assets.
International agreements, such as the Paris Agreement, have set the stage for coordinated
action on climate change, and this momentum is driving the adoption of sustainable
infrastructure practices worldwide. Global partnerships and knowledge-sharing initiatives
between governments, private sector entities, and international organizations are critical
in disseminating best practices, facilitating technology transfer, and promoting the
widespread implementation of sustainable infrastructure solutions.
IX. Conclusion
Through the collective adoption of the principles, strategies, and technologies outlined in
this report, the infrastructure sector can play a pivotal role in addressing the global
challenges posed by climate change, while simultaneously supporting the long-term
prosperity and well-being of communities worldwide.
References
1. Al-Mussawy, Haider Ali, Nezar Hassan Mohamed, and Abdul-Sahib T. Al-
Madhhachi. “Monitoring the Water Quality of the Tigris River for Drinking and
Irrigation Purposes in Maysan Province, Iraq.” Sustainable Water Resources
Management 9, no. 6 (November 6, 2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40899-023-
00960-w.
2. Alsaedi, Alyaa Abdulhussein, Md. Sohrab Hossain, Venugopal Balakrishnan, Ahmad
Naim Ahmad Yahaya, Norli Ismail, Mu. Naushad, Chinna Bathula, and Mardiana
Idayu Ahmad. “Extraction of Municipal Sewage Sludge Lipids Using Supercritical
CO2 for Biodiesel Production: Mathematical and Kinetics Modeling.” Journal of
Chemistry 2022 (September 23, 2022): 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/7349052.
3. Bassoli, Sara Cangussú, Yasmim Arantes Da Fonseca, Hector Javier Luna
Wandurraga, Bruno Eduardo Lobo Baeta, and Mateus De Souza Amaral. “Research
Progress, Trends, and Future Prospects on Hydrothermal Liquefaction of Algae for
Biocrude Production: A Bibliometric Analysis.” Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery,
February 10, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-023-03905-7.
4. Borkovskaya, V. G., R. Roe, and W. Bardenwerper. “Sustainability Risk
Management: The Case for Using Interactive Methodologies for Teaching, Training
and Practice in Environmental Engineering and Other Fields.” In Smart Innovation,
Systems and Technologies, 251–60, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15577-
3_25.
5. Gann, George D., Tein McDonald, Bethanie Walder, James Aronson, Cara R. Nelson,
Justin Jonson, James G. Hallett, et al. “International Principles and Standards for the
Practice of Ecological Restoration. Second Edition.” Restoration Ecology 27, no. S1
(September 1, 2019). https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.13035.
6. Holtz, Robert D., and William D. Kovacs. “Introduction to Geotechnical
Engineering.” In Advances in Civil and Industrial Engineering Book Series, 1–40,
2015. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-6505-7.ch001.
7. Jimoh, I. O., A. A. Amadi, and E. B. Ogunbode. “Strength Characteristics of
Modified Black Clay Subgrade Stabilized with Cement Kiln Dust.” Innovative
Infrastructure Solutions 3, no. 1 (June 28, 2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41062-018-
0154-3.
8. Kennedy, Charles, Ugo Kingsley, and Overo Kenneth Ejukonemu. “ASSESSMENT
OF RESIDUAL LOAD-BEARING CAPACITY OF INDUCED CORROSION ON
REINFORCED CONCRETE MEMBERS.” International Journal of Emerging
Trends in Engineering and Development 5, no. 11 (January 1, 2021).
https://doi.org/10.26808/rs.ed.i11v5.01.
9. Nasser, Ahmed Sami, and Nezar Hassan Mohamed. “Bedform Effect on the Bed-
Load Transport Rate Using a Comparison between Two Bedform (Flat and Standing
Bedform).” Periodicals of Engineering and Natural Sciences (PEN) 8, no. 1 (January
1, 2020): 430–37. https://doi.org/10.21533/pen.v8i1.1181.g525.
10. Ogunbode, E.B., F.O. Fabunmi, S.M. Ibrahim, I.O. Jimoh, and O.O. Idowu.
“Management of Sawmill Wastes in Nigeria: Case Study of Minna, Niger State.”
Greener Journal of Science Engineering and Technological Research 3, no. 2
(February 20, 2013): 034–041. https://doi.org/10.15580/gjsetr.2013.2.012413407.
11. Olumide, Busari Afis, Gbadebo Anthonia Olukemi, Jimoh Ibrahim
OlayinkaTAKEET Olayinka Ezekiel, Enifu, and Jennifer Ene. “Evaluation Of
Performance Of Empirical Models For The Prediction Of Local Scour At Bridge
Piers (Case Study Chanchaga Bridge, Minna, Nigeria).” International Journal of
Engineering Research And 2, no. 3 (March 14, 2013).
https://www.ijert.org/research/evaluation-of-performance-of-empirical-models-for-
the-prediction-of-local-scour-at-bridge-piers-case-study-chanchaga-bridge-minna-
nigeria-IJERTV2IS3077.pdf.
12. Ogunbode, Ezekiel Babatunde, W. P. Akanmu, M. A. Kure, I. O. Jimoh, and R. B. Isa.
"Properties of Cement Stabilized Termite Mound Building Blocks." (2012).
13. Kennedy, Charles. "Corrosion Inhibitive Materials Influence on Load Bearing
Capacity of Reinforced Concrete Beam." Saudi J Civ Eng 5, no. 6 (2021): 147-164.
14. Kennedy, Charles, Philip Kpae FO, and Taneh Anthony Nadum. "Corrosion Potential
Assessment of Eco-friendly Inhibitors Layered Reinforcement Embedded in
Concrete Structures in Severe Medium."
15. Kennedy, Charles. "Reinforcing Steel Corrosion Potential Probability Evaluation
using Electrochemical Hall-Cell Measurement." GSJ 9, no. 7 (2021).
16. Peccia, Jordan, and Paul Westerhoff. “We Should Expect More out of Our Sewage
Sludge.” Environmental Science & Technology 49, no. 14 (June 24, 2015): 8271–76.
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b01931.
17. Post, Mark J., Shulamit Levenberg, David L. Kaplan, Nicholas Genovese, Jianan Fu,
Christopher J. Bryant, Nicole Negowetti, Karin Verzijden, and Panagiota Moutsatsou.
“Scientific, Sustainability and Regulatory Challenges of Cultured Meat.” Nature
Food 1, no. 7 (July 16, 2020): 403–15. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43016-020-0112-z.
18. Roy, Surendra, and Sanjeev Kumar Bhalla. “Role of Geotechnical Properties of Soil
on Civil Engineering Structures.” Resources and Environment 7, no. 4 (January 1,
2017): 103–9.
http://www.sapub.org/global/showpaperpdf.aspx?doi=10.5923/j.re.20170704.03.
19. Sadetmahaleh, Komeil Kohansal. “Hydrothermal Liquefaction of Biopulp: Waste
Management and Sustainable Bioblendstock Production,” 2023.
https://doi.org/10.54337/aau528220765.