Introduction
Introduction
By
MUNAVIRA
23MPY020
INTRODUCTION:
The "drive for muscularity" represents a person's desire to increase muscle size and
strength, often linked to an idealized body image emphasizing a muscular, lean
physique (McCreary & Sasse, 2000). This drive encompasses attitudes, behaviors,
and efforts aimed at enhancing muscularity, including workout frequency, dietary
practices, and supplement use.In young adult men who regularly attend the gym, the
drive for muscularity is heightened by social and cultural ideals portraying muscular
physiques as symbols of masculinity, attractiveness, and health (Ricciardelli &
McCabe, 2004). The gym environment reinforces muscular ideals, contributing to
body dissatisfaction or "muscle dysmorphia" – feeling insufficiently muscular
despite significant muscularity.Research indicates gym-goers, especially young
men, experience higher drive for muscularity levels, leading to both positive
(motivation to train) and negative consequences (overtraining, supplement misuse)
(Smith et al., 2019).
This study examined the relationship between the drive for muscularity and
masculine norms among young adult men who regularly frequent the gym.
Specifically, it aimed to investigate how societal masculine norms influence
individuals’ male body image perceptions and the extent to which men strive to
achieve muscularity. The study focused on young adult men who regularly attend
the gym, as this population is particularly susceptible to societal pressures to
conform to traditional masculine ideals. Young adult men are often bombarded with
media images and societal expectations that emphasize the importance of
muscularity as a hallmark of masculinity (Bandura, 1977). As a result, many young
adult men feel pressure to achieve a muscular physique, which can lead to body
dissatisfaction and disordered eating and exercise behaviors (Leit, Pope, & Gray,
2001; Cafri & Thompson, 2004).
The drive for muscularity Is a complex issue that is influenced by a variety of factors,
including societal masculine norms, media, peers, and family (McCreary & Sasse,
2000). According to Social Learning Theory, individuals learn behaviors and norms
through observation and reinforcement from their environment (Bandura, 1977). In
the context of muscularity, this means that young adult men may adopt muscularity
ideals as a way to conform to traditional masculine norms. Gender Role Strain
Theory (GRST) also provides insight into the relationship between masculine norms
and muscularity, suggesting that societal expectations around traditional masculine
roles can lead to stress when individuals feel they cannot meet these standards
(Pleck, 1981). For men, achieving a muscular body often aligns with perceived
masculinity, and failure to attain it can result in anxiety and dissatisfaction with body
image.
The Tripartite Influence Model also explains how societal factors such as media,
peers, and family influence body image through internalization and social
comparison (Smolak & Levine, 2001). Men internalize the muscular male ideal
promoted by media and peers, leading to behaviors aimed at increasing muscularity.
Studies have consistently shown that exposure to media emphasizing muscular male
bodies increases dissatisfaction with one’s physique and the drive to achieve
muscularity (Leit, Pope, & Gray, 2001). Additionally, the Conformity to Masculine
Norms Inventory (CMNI) has linked adherence to masculine norms with behaviors
such as excessive exercise, body dissatisfaction, and disordered eating (Mahalik et
al., 2003).
The drive for muscularity is closely tied to masculine norms, with societal
expectations and social comparison playing a significant role in shaping male
behaviors and attitudes towards muscularity. Understanding the dynamics between
muscularity and masculine norms is essential for developing effective interventions
aimed at promoting healthy body image and reducing the pressure to conform to
traditional masculine ideals.