0% found this document useful (0 votes)
2 views

1.1 Unit I-Metric spaces and examples

The document defines metric spaces and provides examples, including the real line with the usual metric and the discrete metric. It outlines the properties that a mapping must satisfy to be considered a metric and demonstrates these properties through proofs. Additionally, it discusses Minkowski's inequality and presents metrics for three-dimensional points in ℝ3.

Uploaded by

inusaikia3
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
2 views

1.1 Unit I-Metric spaces and examples

The document defines metric spaces and provides examples, including the real line with the usual metric and the discrete metric. It outlines the properties that a mapping must satisfy to be considered a metric and demonstrates these properties through proofs. Additionally, it discusses Minkowski's inequality and presents metrics for three-dimensional points in ℝ3.

Uploaded by

inusaikia3
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 31

Metric spaces and examples: -

Definition: Set: A set is a well-defined collection of objects with some common properties.

Space: A set equipped with some algebraic or geometric or topological or ordered structure
is called a space.

Metric Spaces:
Let X be a nonempty set and let 𝑑: 𝑋 × 𝑋 ⟶ ℝ be a mapping satisfying the following
conditions

𝑚1 ). 𝑑(𝑥, 𝑦) ≥ 0, ∀ 𝑥, 𝑦 ∈ 𝑋 (non negativeness)

𝑚2 ). 𝑑(𝑥, 𝑦) = 0 ⟺ 𝑥 = 𝑦 , ∀ 𝑥, 𝑦 ∈ 𝑋 (equality)

𝑚3 ). 𝑑(𝑥, 𝑦) = 𝑑(𝑦, 𝑥) , ∀ 𝑥, 𝑦 ∈ 𝑋 (Symmetry)

𝑚4 ). 𝑑(𝑥, 𝑦) ≤ 𝑑(𝑥, 𝑧) + 𝑑(𝑧, 𝑦) , ∀ 𝑥, 𝑦, 𝑧 ∈ 𝑋 (Triangle inequality)

Then 𝑑 is called a metric or distance functions and (𝑋, 𝑑) is called a metric space.

In this case the elements of 𝑋 are called points.


1. Consider the real line ℝ and defined a map 𝑑: ℝ × ℝ ⟶ ℝ by 𝑑(𝑥, 𝑦) = |𝑥 − 𝑦|,
∀ 𝑥, 𝑦 ∈ ℝ. Show that 𝑑 is a metric on ℝ.

Solution: - Here 𝑑: ℝ × ℝ ⟶ ℝ is a map defined by 𝑑(𝑥, 𝑦) = |𝑥 − 𝑦|, ∀ 𝑥, 𝑦 ∈ ℝ.


We are to prove that d is a metric on ℝ.

𝑚1 ). we know that |𝑥 − 𝑦| ≥ 0 , ∀ 𝑥, 𝑦 ∈ ℝ
⟹ 𝑑(𝑥, 𝑦) ≥ 0 ∀ 𝑥, 𝑦 ∈ ℝ [by definition of the map 𝑑]

𝑚2 ). 𝑑(𝑥, 𝑦) = 0
⇔ |𝑥 − 𝑦| = 0
⇔ 𝑥−𝑦 =0
⇔ 𝑥=𝑦
∴ 𝑑(𝑥, 𝑦) = 0 ⇔ 𝑥 = 𝑦 ∀ 𝑥, 𝑦 ∈ ℝ

𝑚3 ). 𝑑(𝑥, 𝑦) = |𝑥 − 𝑦|
= |(−1)(𝑦 − 𝑥)|
= |(−1)||𝑦 − 𝑥|
= |𝑦 − 𝑥|
= 𝑑(𝑦, 𝑥)
∴ 𝑑(𝑥, 𝑦) = 𝑑(𝑦, 𝑥) , ∀ 𝑥, 𝑦 ∈ ℝ

𝑚4 ). Let 𝑥, 𝑦, 𝑧 ∈ ℝ
Now 𝑑(𝑥, 𝑦) = |𝑥 − 𝑦|
= |𝑥 − 𝑧 + 𝑧 − 𝑦|
≤ |𝑥 − 𝑧| + |𝑧 − 𝑦|
= 𝑑(𝑥, 𝑧) + 𝑑(𝑧, 𝑦)
∴ 𝑑(𝑥, 𝑦) ≤ 𝑑(𝑥, 𝑧) + 𝑑(𝑧, 𝑦) , ∀ 𝑥, 𝑦, 𝑧 ∈ ℝ
Consequently the results 𝑚1 , 𝑚2 , 𝑚3 and 𝑚4 together imply that 𝑑 is a metric on ℝ and
hence (ℝ, 𝑑) is a metric space.
Remark: The above metric 𝑑 is known as the usual metric on ℝ.
2. Consider the real line ℝ and define a map 𝑑: ℝ × ℝ ⟶ ℝ by
1 𝑖𝑓 𝑥≠𝑦
𝑑(𝑥, 𝑦) = {
0 𝑖𝑓 𝑥=𝑦

Show that d is a metric on ℝ.

Solution: - Here 𝑑: ℝ × ℝ ⟶ ℝ is a map defined by


1 𝑖𝑓 𝑥 ≠ 𝑦
𝑑(𝑥, 𝑦) = ⟦ .
0 𝑖𝑓 𝑥 = 𝑦

We are to prove that d is a metric on ℝ.


𝑚1 ). Here the range of d consists of exactly two points viz. 1 and 0.
So 𝑑(𝑥, 𝑦) ≥ 0 ∀ 𝑥, 𝑦 ∈ ℝ
𝑚2 ). By definition
𝑑(𝑥, 𝑦) = 0 ⇔ 𝑥 = 𝑦 ∀ 𝑥, 𝑦 ∈ ℝ
𝑚3 ). Let 𝑥 and 𝑦 be any two points in ℝ
If 𝑥 = 𝑦, then 𝑑(𝑥, 𝑦) = 0 & 𝑑(𝑦, 𝑥) = 0 So in this case 𝑑(𝑥, 𝑦) = 𝑑(𝑦, 𝑥)

Next suppose that 𝑥 ≠ 𝑦 then 𝑑(𝑥, 𝑦) = 1 & 𝑑(𝑦, 𝑥) = 1


So in this case also 𝑑(𝑥, 𝑦) = 𝑑(𝑦, 𝑥)
Hence we can conclude that 𝑑(𝑥, 𝑦) = 𝑑(𝑦, 𝑥) ∀ 𝑥, 𝑦 ∈ ℝ
𝑚4 ). Let 𝑥, 𝑦, 𝑧 ∈ ℝ
If 𝑥 = 𝑦, then 𝑑(𝑥, 𝑦) = 0
And 𝑑(𝑥, 𝑧) ≥ 0 and 𝑑(𝑧, 𝑦) ≥ 0
So in this case 𝑑(𝑥, 𝑦) ≤ 𝑑(𝑥, 𝑧) + 𝑑(𝑧, 𝑦)
Next suppose that 𝑥 ≠ 𝑦
Then 𝑑(𝑥, 𝑦) = 1
Then also we have either 𝑧 ≠ 𝑥 or 𝑧 ≠ 𝑦
i.e. either 𝑑(𝑥, 𝑧) = 1 or 𝑑(𝑧, 𝑦) = 1
So in this case also 𝑑(𝑥, 𝑦) ≤ 𝑑(𝑥, 𝑧) + 𝑑(𝑧, 𝑦)

∴ 𝑑(𝑥, 𝑦) ≤ 𝑑(𝑥, 𝑧) + 𝑑(𝑧, 𝑦) ∀ 𝑥, 𝑦, 𝑧 ∈ ℝ

Consequently the results 𝑚1 , 𝑚2 , 𝑚3 and 𝑚4 together imply that 𝑑 is a metric on


ℝ and hence (ℝ, 𝑑) is a metric space.
Remark:

(1). The above metric 𝑑 is known as the discrete metric on ℝ.

(2). Any arbitrary nonempty set can be made a metric space with respect to a metric
1 𝑖𝑓 𝑥 ≠ 𝑦
d defined by 𝑑(𝑥, 𝑦) = ⟦
0 𝑖𝑓 𝑥 = 𝑦

Theorem: Let (𝑋, 𝑑) be a metric space. Prove that for any three points 𝑥, 𝑦, 𝑧 the following
result is true. |𝑑(𝑥, 𝑧) − 𝑑(𝑧, 𝑦)| ≤ 𝑑(𝑥, 𝑦)
𝑦

Solution: - By the triangle inequality we have

𝑑(𝑥, 𝑧) ≤ 𝑑(𝑥, 𝑦) + 𝑑(𝑦, 𝑧)


𝑥

⟹ 𝑑(𝑥, 𝑧) − 𝑑(𝑦, 𝑧) ≤ 𝑑(𝑥, 𝑦)


𝑧
⟹ 𝑑(𝑥, 𝑧) − 𝑑(𝑧, 𝑦) ≤ 𝑑(𝑥, 𝑦) [Since 𝑑(𝑦, 𝑧) = 𝑑(𝑧, 𝑦)] (*)

Again by triangle inequality we have

𝑑(𝑧, 𝑦) ≤ 𝑑(𝑧, 𝑥) + 𝑑(𝑥, 𝑦)


⟹ 𝑑(𝑧, 𝑦) − 𝑑(𝑧, 𝑥) ≤ 𝑑(𝑥, 𝑦)
⟹ 𝑑(𝑧, 𝑦) − 𝑑(𝑥, 𝑧) ≤ 𝑑(𝑥, 𝑦) [Since 𝑑(𝑧, 𝑥) = 𝑑(𝑥, 𝑧)] (**)
From the result (*) and (**) we can conclude that
|𝑑(𝑥, 𝑧) − 𝑑(𝑧, 𝑦)| ≤ 𝑑(𝑥, 𝑦)

Hence proved.

An important inequality:

Minkowski’s Inequality: -

If {𝑎1 , 𝑎2 , 𝑎3 … … 𝑎𝑛 } and {𝑏1 , 𝑏2 , 𝑏3 … … 𝑏𝑛 } be two finite set of real


numbers or complex numbers then
1 1 1
𝑛 2 𝑛 2 𝑛 2
[∑|𝑎𝑖 + 𝑏𝑖 |2 ] ≤ [∑|𝑎𝑖 |2 ] + [∑|𝑏𝑖 |2 ]
𝑖=1 𝑖=1 𝑖=1
3. Let ℝ3 consists of all three dimensional points 𝑥 = (𝑥1 , 𝑥2 , 𝑥3 ), 𝑥𝑖 ′𝑠 ∈ ℝ. Show that
the following mappings are metrics on ℝ3
𝑑1 : ℝ3 × ℝ3 → ℝ defined by
1⁄
3 2
𝑑1 (𝑥, 𝑦) = [  ( x i − yi ) ] 2
Where 𝑥 = (𝑥1 , 𝑥2 , 𝑥3 ) and
i =1

𝑦 = (𝑦1 , 𝑦2 , 𝑦3 ) ∈ ℝ3

3
𝑑2 (𝑥, 𝑦) = x
i =1
i − yi

𝑑3 (𝑥, 𝑦) = max { x i − y i , 1 ≤ i ≤ 3}

Solution: - Here ℝ3 = {𝑥 = (𝑥1 , 𝑥2 , 𝑥3 )|𝑥𝑖′ 𝑠 ∈ ℝ}


and 𝑑1 : ℝ3 × ℝ3 → ℝ defined by
1⁄
3 2
𝑑1 (𝑥, 𝑦) = [  ( x i − yi ) 2 ]
i =1

Where 𝑥 = (𝑥1 , 𝑥2 , 𝑥3 ) and 𝑦 = (𝑦1 , 𝑦2 , 𝑦3 ) ∈ ℝ3


We are to show that 𝑑1 is a metric on ℝ3
𝑚1 ). We know that (𝑥𝑖 − 𝑦𝑖 )2 ≥ 0 ∀ 𝑖 = 1,2,3
3
⟹ 
i =1
(𝑥𝑖 − 𝑦𝑖 )2 ≥ 0

1
3 2
⟹ [  (𝑥𝑖 − 𝑦𝑖 )2 ] ≥ 0
i =1

⟹ 𝑑1 (𝑥, 𝑦) ≥ 0 ∀ 𝑥, 𝑦 ∈ ℝ3
𝑚2 ). 𝑑1 (𝑥, 𝑦) = 0
1
3 2
⇔ [  (𝑥𝑖 − 𝑦𝑖 )2 ] = 0
i =1

3
⇔ 
i =1
(𝑥𝑖 − 𝑦𝑖 )2 = 0

⇔ (𝑥𝑖 − 𝑦𝑖 )2 = 0 ∀ 𝑖 = 1,2,3
⇔ 𝑥𝑖 − 𝑦𝑖 = 0 ∀ 𝑖 = 1,2,3
⇔ 𝑥𝑖 = 𝑦𝑖 ∀ 𝑖 = 1,2,3
⇔ 𝑥=𝑦
∴ 𝑑1 (𝑥, 𝑦) = 0 ⇔ 𝑥 = 𝑦 ∀ 𝑥, 𝑦 ∈ ℝ3
1
3 2
𝑚3 ). 𝑑1 (𝑥, 𝑦) = [  (𝑥𝑖 − 𝑦𝑖 )2 ]
i =1

1
3 2
= [  (𝑦𝑖 − 𝑥𝑖 )2 ]
i =1

= 𝑑1 (𝑦, 𝑥)
∴ 𝑑1 (𝑥, 𝑦) = 𝑑1 (𝑦, 𝑥) ∀ 𝑥, 𝑦 ∈ ℝ3
𝑚4 ). Let 𝑧 = (𝑧1 , 𝑧2 , 𝑧3 ) ∈ ℝ3
1
3 2
Now 𝑑1 (𝑥, 𝑦) = [  (𝑥𝑖 − 𝑦𝑖 )2 ]
i =1

1
3 2
= [  (𝑥𝑖 − 𝑧𝑖 + 𝑧𝑖 − 𝑦𝑖 )2 ]
i =1

1 1
3 2 3 2
≤ [  (𝑥𝑖 − 𝑧𝑖 )2 ] + [  (𝑧𝑖 − 𝑦𝑖 )2 ]
i =1 i =1

[By Minkowski’s inequality]


= 𝑑1 (𝑥, 𝑧) + 𝑑1 (𝑧, 𝑦)
∴ 𝑑1 (𝑥, 𝑦) ≤ 𝑑1 (𝑥, 𝑧) + 𝑑1 (𝑧, 𝑦) ∀ 𝑥, 𝑦, 𝑧 ∈ ℝ3

Consequently the results 𝑚1 , 𝑚2 , 𝑚3 and 𝑚4 together imply that 𝑑1 is a metric


on ℝ3 and hence (ℝ3 , 𝑑) is a metric space.

(2). Solution: - Here ℝ3 = {𝑥 = (𝑥1 , 𝑥2 , 𝑥3 )|𝑥𝑖′ 𝑠 ∈ ℝ}


3
and 𝑑2 : ℝ3 × ℝ3 → ℝ defined by𝑑2 (𝑥, 𝑦) = i =1
|𝑥𝑖 − 𝑦𝑖 |

Where 𝑥 = (𝑥1 , 𝑥2 , 𝑥3 ) and 𝑦 = (𝑦1 , 𝑦2 , 𝑦3 ) ∈ ℝ3


We are to show that 𝑑2 is a metric on ℝ3
𝑚1 ). we |𝑥𝑖 − 𝑦𝑖 | ≥ 0 ∀ 𝑖 = 1,2,3
3
⟹ i =1
|𝑥𝑖 − 𝑦𝑖 | ≥ 0

⟹ 𝑑2 (𝑥, 𝑦) ≥ 0 ∀ 𝑥, 𝑦 ∈ ℝ3
𝑚2 ). 𝑑2 (𝑥, 𝑦) = 0
3
⇔ 
i =1
|𝑥𝑖 − 𝑦𝑖 | = 0

⇔ |𝑥𝑖 − 𝑦𝑖 | = 0 ∀ 𝑖 = 1,2,3
⇔ 𝑥𝑖 − 𝑦𝑖 = 0 ∀ 𝑖 = 1,2,3
⇔ 𝑥𝑖 = 𝑦𝑖 ∀ 𝑖 = 1,2,3
⇔ 𝑥=𝑦
∴ 𝑑2 (𝑥, 𝑦) = 0 ⇔ 𝑥 = 𝑦 ∀ 𝑥, 𝑦 ∈ ℝ3
3
𝑚3 ). 𝑑2 (𝑥, 𝑦) = 
i =1
|𝑥𝑖 − 𝑦𝑖 |

3
= i =1
|𝑦𝑖 − 𝑥𝑖 |

= 𝑑2 (𝑦, 𝑥)
∴ 𝑑2 (𝑥, 𝑦) = 𝑑2 (𝑦, 𝑥) ∀ 𝑥, 𝑦 ∈ ℝ3

𝑚4 ). Let 𝑧 = (𝑧1 , 𝑧2 , 𝑧3 ) ∈ ℝ3
3
Now 𝑑2 (𝑥, 𝑦) =  i =1
|𝑥𝑖 − 𝑦𝑖 |

3
= i =1
|𝑥𝑖 − 𝑧𝑖 + 𝑧𝑖 − 𝑦𝑖 |

3 3
≤ 
i =1
|𝑥𝑖 − 𝑧𝑖 | + 
i =1
|𝑧𝑖 − 𝑦𝑖 |

= 𝑑2 (𝑥, 𝑧) + 𝑑2 (𝑧, 𝑦)
∴ 𝑑2 (𝑥, 𝑦) ≤ 𝑑2 (𝑥, 𝑧) + 𝑑2 (𝑧, 𝑦) ∀ 𝑥, 𝑦, 𝑧 ∈ ℝ3
Consequently the results 𝑚1 , 𝑚2 , 𝑚3 and 𝑚4 together imply that 𝑑2 is a metric on ℝ3 and
hence (ℝ3 , 𝑑) is a metric space.
4. Let ℝ𝑛 consists of all n dimensional points 𝑥 = (𝑥1 , 𝑥2 , … 𝑥𝑛 ), 𝑥𝑖 ′𝑠 ∈ ℝ𝑛 . Show that
the following mappings are metrics on ℝ𝑛
1⁄
n 2
𝑑1 : ℝ𝑛 × ℝ𝑛 → ℝ defined by 𝑑1 (𝑥, 𝑦) = [  ( x i − y i ) 2 ]
i =1

Where 𝑥 = (𝑥1 , 𝑥2 , … 𝑥𝑛 ), 𝑦 = (𝑦1 , 𝑦2 , … 𝑦𝑛 ) ∈ ℝ𝑛


n
𝑑2 (𝑥, 𝑦) = x
i =1
i − yi

max
𝑑3 (𝑥, 𝑦) = 1≤i≤n { x i − yi }

Solution: - Here ℝ𝑛 be the collections of n tuples 𝑥 = (𝑥1 , 𝑥2 , … 𝑥𝑛 ), 𝑥𝑖 ′𝑠 ∈ ℝ𝑛 .


and 𝑑1 : ℝ𝑛 × ℝ𝑛 → ℝ be a map defined by
1⁄
n 2
𝑑1 (𝑥, 𝑦) = [  (𝑥𝑖 − 𝑦𝑖 ) ] 2
i =1

Where 𝑥 = (𝑥1 , 𝑥2 , … 𝑥𝑛 ), 𝑦 = (𝑦1 , 𝑦2 , … 𝑦𝑛 ) ∈ ℝ𝑛


We are to show that 𝑑1 is a metric on ℝ𝑛

𝑚1 ). We have (𝑥𝑖 − 𝑦𝑖 )2 ≥ 0 ∀ 𝑖 = 1,2,3 … … 𝑛


n
⟹ 
i =1
(𝑥𝑖 − 𝑦𝑖 )2 ≥ 0

1
n 2
⟹ [  (𝑥𝑖 − 𝑦𝑖 )2 ] ≥ 0 [taking the square root]
i =1

⟹ 𝑑1 (𝑥, 𝑦) ≥ 0 ∀ 𝑥, 𝑦 ∈ ℝ𝑛
𝑚2 ). 𝑑1 (𝑥, 𝑦) = 0
1
n 2
⇔ [  (𝑥𝑖 − 𝑦𝑖 )2 ] = 0
i =1

n
⇔ 
i =1
(𝑥𝑖 − 𝑦𝑖 )2 = 0

⇔ (𝑥𝑖 − 𝑦𝑖 )2 = 0 ∀ 𝑖 = 1,2,3 … … 𝑛
⇔ 𝑥𝑖 − 𝑦𝑖 = 0 ∀ 𝑖 = 1,2,3 … … 𝑛
⇔ 𝑥𝑖 = 𝑦𝑖 ∀ 𝑖 = 1,2,3 … … 𝑛
⇔ 𝑥=𝑦
∴ 𝑑1 (𝑥, 𝑦) = 0 ⇔ 𝑥 = 𝑦 ∀ 𝑥, 𝑦 ∈ ℝ3
1
n 2
𝑚3 ). 𝑑1 (𝑥, 𝑦) = [  (𝑥𝑖 − 𝑦𝑖 )2 ]
i =1

1
n 2
= [  (𝑦𝑖 − 𝑥𝑖 )2 ]
i =1

= |(−1)||𝑦 − 𝑥|
= 𝑑1 (𝑦, 𝑥)
∴ 𝑑1 (𝑥, 𝑦) = 𝑑1 (𝑦, 𝑥) ∀ 𝑥, 𝑦 ∈ ℝ𝑛

𝑚4 ). Let 𝑧 = (𝑧1 , 𝑧2 , 𝑧3 , … … 𝑧𝑛 ) ∈ ℝ𝑛
1
n 2
Now 𝑑1 (𝑥, 𝑦) = [  (𝑥𝑖 − 𝑦𝑖 )2 ]
i =1

1
n 2
= [  (𝑥𝑖 − 𝑧𝑖 + 𝑧𝑖 − 𝑦𝑖 )2 ]
i =1

1 1
n 2 n 2
≤ [  (𝑥𝑖 − 𝑧𝑖 )2 ] + [  (𝑧𝑖 − 𝑦𝑖 )2 ]
i =1 i =1

[By Minkowski’s inequality]


= 𝑑1 (𝑥, 𝑧) + 𝑑1 (𝑧, 𝑦)
∴ 𝑑1 (𝑥, 𝑦) ≤ 𝑑1 (𝑥, 𝑧) + 𝑑1 (𝑧, 𝑦) ∀ 𝑥, 𝑦, 𝑧 ∈ ℝ
Consequently the results 𝑚1 , 𝑚2 , 𝑚3 and 𝑚4 together imply that 𝑑1 is a metric on ℝ𝑛 and
hence (ℝ𝑛 , 𝑑) is a metric space.

(2). Here ℝ𝑛 be the collections of n tuples 𝑥 = (𝑥1 , 𝑥2 , … 𝑥𝑛 ), 𝑥𝑖 ′𝑠 ∈ ℝ𝑛 .


and 𝑑2 : ℝ𝑛 × ℝ𝑛 → ℝ be a map defined by
3
𝑑2 (𝑥, 𝑦) = 
i =1
|𝑥𝑖 − 𝑦𝑖 |

Where 𝑥 = (𝑥1 , 𝑥2 , … 𝑥𝑛 ), 𝑦 = (𝑦1 , 𝑦2 , … 𝑦𝑛 ) ∈ ℝ𝑛


We want to show that 𝑑2 is a metric on ℝ𝑛
𝑚1 ). we have |𝑥𝑖 − 𝑦𝑖 | ≥ 0 ∀ 𝑖 = 1,2,3 … … 𝑛
n
⟹ 
i =1
|𝑥𝑖 − 𝑦𝑖 | ≥ 0

⟹ 𝑑2 (𝑥, 𝑦) ≥ 0 ∀ 𝑥, 𝑦 ∈ ℝ𝑛
𝑚2 ). 𝑑2 (𝑥, 𝑦) = 0
n
⇔ 
i =1
|𝑥𝑖 − 𝑦𝑖 | = 0

⇔ |𝑥𝑖 − 𝑦𝑖 | = 0 ∀ 𝑖 = 1,2,3 … … 𝑛
⇔ 𝑥𝑖 − 𝑦𝑖 = 0 ∀ 𝑖 = 1,2,3 … … 𝑛
⇔ 𝑥𝑖 = 𝑦𝑖 ∀ 𝑖 = 1,2,3 … … 𝑛
⇔ 𝑥=𝑦
∴ 𝑑2 (𝑥, 𝑦) = 0 ⇔ 𝑥 = 𝑦 ∀ 𝑥, 𝑦 ∈ ℝ𝑛

n
𝑚3 ). 𝑑2 (𝑥, 𝑦) = 
i =1
|𝑥𝑖 − 𝑦𝑖 |

n
= i =1
|𝑦𝑖 − 𝑥𝑖 |

= 𝑑2 (𝑦, 𝑥)
∴ 𝑑2 (𝑥, 𝑦) = 𝑑2 (𝑦, 𝑥) ∀ 𝑥, 𝑦 ∈ ℝ𝑛

𝑚4 ). Let 𝑧 = (𝑧1 , 𝑧2 , 𝑧3 , … … 𝑧𝑛 ) ∈ ℝ𝑛
n
Now 𝑑2 (𝑥, 𝑦) =  i =1
|𝑥𝑖 − 𝑦𝑖 |

n
= i =1
|𝑥𝑖 − 𝑧𝑖 + 𝑧𝑖 − 𝑦𝑖 |

n n
≤ 
i =1
|𝑥𝑖 − 𝑧𝑖 | + 
i =1
|𝑧𝑖 − 𝑦𝑖 |

[By Minkowski’s inequality]


= 𝑑2 (𝑥, 𝑧) + 𝑑2 (𝑧, 𝑦)
∴ 𝑑2 (𝑥, 𝑦) ≤ 𝑑2 (𝑥, 𝑧) + 𝑑2 (𝑧, 𝑦) ∀ 𝑥, 𝑦, 𝑧 ∈ ℝ𝑛
Consequently the results 𝑚1 , 𝑚2 , 𝑚3 and 𝑚4 together imply that 𝑑2 is a metric on ℝ𝑛 and
hence (ℝ𝑛 , 𝑑2 ) is a metric space.
(3). Here ℝ𝑛 be the collections of all n-tuples, 𝑥 = (𝑥1 , 𝑥2 , … 𝑥𝑛 ), 𝑥𝑖 ′𝑠 ∈ ℝ𝑛 .
and 𝑑2 : ℝ𝑛 × ℝ𝑛 → ℝ be a map defined by
𝑚𝑎𝑥
𝑑3 (𝑥, 𝑦) = 1≤𝑖≤𝑛 |𝑥𝑖 − 𝑦𝑖 |
Where 𝑥 = (𝑥1 , 𝑥2 , … 𝑥𝑛 ), 𝑦 = (𝑦1 , 𝑦2 , … 𝑦𝑛 ) ∈ ℝ𝑛
We want to show that 𝑑2 is a metric on ℝ𝑛
𝑚1 ). we have |𝑥𝑖 − 𝑦𝑖 | ≥ 0 ∀ 𝑖 = 1,2,3 … … 𝑛
𝑚𝑎𝑥
⟹ 1≤𝑖≤𝑛 |𝑥𝑖 − 𝑦𝑖 | ≥ 0
⟹ 𝑑3 (𝑥, 𝑦) ≥ 0 ∀ 𝑥, 𝑦 ∈ ℝ𝑛

𝑚2 ). 𝑑3 (𝑥, 𝑦) = 0
𝑚𝑎𝑥
⇔ 1≤𝑖≤𝑛
|𝑥𝑖 − 𝑦𝑖 | = 0
⇔ |𝑥𝑖 − 𝑦𝑖 | = 0 ∀ 𝑖 = 1,2,3 … … 𝑛
⇔ 𝑥𝑖 − 𝑦𝑖 = 0 ∀ 𝑖 = 1,2,3 … … 𝑛
⇔ 𝑥𝑖 = 𝑦𝑖 ∀ 𝑖 = 1,2,3 … … 𝑛
⇔ 𝑥=𝑦
∴ 𝑑3 (𝑥, 𝑦) = 0 ⇔ 𝑥 = 𝑦 ∀ 𝑥, 𝑦 ∈ ℝ𝑛

𝑚𝑎𝑥
𝑚3 ). 𝑑3 (𝑥, 𝑦) = 1≤𝑖≤𝑛 |𝑥𝑖 − 𝑦𝑖 |
𝑚𝑎𝑥
= 1≤𝑖≤𝑛 |𝑦𝑖 − 𝑥𝑖 |
= 𝑑3 (𝑦, 𝑥)
∴ 𝑑3 (𝑥, 𝑦) = 𝑑3 (𝑦, 𝑥) ∀ 𝑥, 𝑦 ∈ ℝ𝑛

𝑚4 ). Let 𝑧 = (𝑧1 , 𝑧2 , 𝑧3 , … … 𝑧𝑛 ) ∈ ℝ𝑛
𝑚𝑎𝑥
Now 𝑑3 (𝑥, 𝑦) = 1≤𝑖≤𝑛 |𝑥𝑖 − 𝑦𝑖 |
𝑚𝑎𝑥
= 1≤𝑖≤𝑛 |𝑥𝑖 − 𝑧𝑖 + 𝑧𝑖 − 𝑦𝑖 |
𝑚𝑎𝑥 𝑚𝑎𝑥
≤ 1≤𝑖≤𝑛
|𝑥𝑖 − 𝑧𝑖 | + 1≤𝑖≤𝑛 |𝑧𝑖 − 𝑦𝑖 |
= 𝑑3 (𝑥, 𝑧) + 𝑑3 (𝑧, 𝑦)
∴ 𝑑3 (𝑥, 𝑦) ≤ 𝑑3 (𝑥, 𝑧) + 𝑑3 (𝑧, 𝑦) ∀ 𝑥, 𝑦, 𝑧 ∈ ℝ𝑛
Consequently the results 𝑚1 , 𝑚2 , 𝑚3 and 𝑚4 together imply that 𝑑2 is a metric on ℝ𝑛 and
hence (ℝ𝑛 , 𝑑3 ) is a metric space.
5. Let 𝑙2 be the set consists of all real sequences 𝑥 = x n n =1 having the property that

x
n =1
2
n   . Prove that 𝑙2 is a metric space with respect to a metric defined by you.


Solution: - Here 𝑙2 = {𝑥 = {𝑥𝑛 }∞
𝑛=1 | 
n =1
𝑥𝑛2 < ∞ }

Let us define a map 𝑑: 𝑙2 × 𝑙2 → ℝ by

1⁄
 2
𝑑(𝑥, 𝑦) = [  (𝑥𝑛 − 𝑦𝑛 )2 ]
n =1

Where 𝑥 = {𝑥𝑛 }, 𝑦 = {𝑦𝑛 } ∈ 𝑙2

We first want to show that 𝑑 is well defined.

Since 𝑥 = {𝑥𝑛 }, 𝑦 = {𝑦𝑛 } ∈ 𝑙2

 
∃ positive constants A and B such that 
n =1
𝑥𝑛2 < 𝐴 & 
n =1
𝑥𝑛2 < 𝐵

1⁄
 2
Now 𝑑(𝑥, 𝑦) = [  (𝑥𝑛 − 𝑦𝑛 )2 ]
n =1

1⁄
 2
= [  {𝑥𝑛 + (−𝑦𝑛 )}2 ]
n =1

1⁄ 1⁄
 2  2
≤ [  𝑥𝑛 2 ] + [  𝑦𝑛 2 ] [By Minlowskis’s Inequality]
n =1 n =1

1 1
≤ 𝐴2 + 𝐵 2

1 1
=𝐾 Where 𝐾 = 𝐴2 + 𝐵 2 is a positive constant

Thus for every pair of points 𝑥, 𝑦 ∈ 𝑙2 , 𝑑(𝑥, 𝑦) represents a non-negative


definite real number and so d is well defined.
Next we want to show that d is a metric on 𝑙2 .

𝑚1 ). We have (𝑥𝑛 − 𝑦𝑛 )2 ≥ 0 ∀ 𝑛 = 1,2,3 … … ∞


⟹ 
n =1
(𝑥𝑛 − 𝑦𝑛 )2 ≥ 0

1
 2
⟹ [  (𝑥𝑛 − 𝑦𝑛 )2 ] ≥ 0 [taking the square root]
n =1

⟹ 𝑑(𝑥, 𝑦) ≥ 0 ∀ 𝑥, 𝑦 ∈ 𝑙2

𝑚2 ). 𝑑(𝑥, 𝑦) = 0

1
 2
⇔ [  (𝑥𝑛 − 𝑦𝑛 )2 ] = 0
n =1


⇔ 
n =1
(𝑥𝑛 − 𝑦𝑛 )2 = 0

⇔ (𝑥𝑛 − 𝑦𝑛 )2 = 0 ∀ 𝑛 = 1,2,3 … … ∞

⇔ 𝑥𝑛 − 𝑦𝑛 = 0 ∀ 𝑛 = 1,2,3 … … ∞

⇔ 𝑥𝑛 = 𝑦𝑛 ∀ 𝑛 = 1,2,3 … … ∞

⇔ 𝑥=𝑦

∴ 𝑑(𝑥, 𝑦) = 0 ⇔ 𝑥 = 𝑦 ∀ 𝑥, 𝑦 ∈ 𝑙2

1
 2
𝑚3 ). 𝑑(𝑥, 𝑦) = [  (𝑥𝑛 − 𝑦𝑛 )2 ]
n =1

1
 2
= [  (𝑦𝑛 − 𝑥𝑛 )2 ]
n =1

= 𝑑(𝑦, 𝑥)
∴ 𝑑(𝑥, 𝑦) = 𝑑(𝑦, 𝑥) ∀ 𝑥, 𝑦 ∈ 𝑙2

𝑚4 ). Let 𝑧 = {𝑧𝑛 }∞
𝑛=1 ∈ 𝑙2

1
n 2
Now 𝑑1 (𝑥, 𝑦) = [  (𝑥𝑛 − 𝑦𝑛 )2 ]
n =1

1
n 2
= [  (𝑥𝑛 − 𝑧𝑛 + 𝑧𝑛 − 𝑦𝑛 )2 ]
n =1

1 1
n 2 n 2
≤ [  (𝑥𝑛 − 𝑧𝑛 )2 ] + [  (𝑧𝑛 − 𝑦𝑛 )2 ]
n =1 n =1

[By Minkowski’s inequality]

The above inequality is true for any positive integer n and hence letting 𝑛 → ∞ we obtain

1 1 1
 2  2  2
[  (𝑥𝑛 − 𝑦𝑛 )2 ] ≤ [  (𝑥𝑛 − 𝑧𝑛 )2 ] + [  (𝑧𝑛 − 𝑦𝑛 )2 ]
n =1 n =1 n =1

⟹ 𝑑(𝑥, 𝑦) ≤ 𝑑(𝑥, 𝑧) + 𝑑(𝑧, 𝑦) ∀ 𝑥, 𝑦, 𝑧 ∈ 𝑙2

Consequently the results 𝑚1 , 𝑚2 , 𝑚3 and 𝑚4 together imply that 𝑑1 is a metric on 𝑙2 and


hence (𝑙2 , 𝑑) is a metric space.
6. Let 𝐶[𝑎, 𝑏] be the collections of all continuous real valued functions defined on the
closed interval [𝑎, 𝑏]. Prove that 𝑐[𝑎, 𝑏] is a metric space with each of the following
metrics

i). 𝑑: 𝑐[𝑎, 𝑏] × 𝑐[𝑎, 𝑏] → ℝ such that

𝑑(𝑓, 𝑔) = sup{|𝑓(𝑥) − 𝑔(𝑥)|: 𝑥 ∈ [𝑎, 𝑏]}

𝑏
ii). 𝜌(𝑓, 𝑔) = ∫𝑎 |𝑓(𝑥) − 𝑔(𝑥)|𝑑𝑥

Solution: - Here 𝐶[𝑎, 𝑏] = {𝑓 |𝑓: [𝑎, 𝑏] → ℝ & 𝑓 𝑖𝑠 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑖𝑛𝑜𝑢𝑠} and


𝑑: 𝐶[𝑎, 𝑏] × 𝐶[𝑎, 𝑏] ⟶ ℝ is a map defined by

𝑑(𝑓, 𝑔) = sup{|𝑓(𝑥) − 𝑔(𝑥)|: 𝑥 ∈ [𝑎, 𝑏]}

We first want to show that d is well defined

Since f and g are continuous functions on [𝑎, 𝑏] they are bounded. So ∃


positive constants 𝐾1 and 𝐾2 such that |𝑓(𝑥)| ≤ 𝐾1 and |𝑔(𝑥)| ≤ 𝐾2 ∀ 𝑥 ∈ [𝑎, 𝑏]

Now 𝑑(𝑓, 𝑔) = sup{|𝑓(𝑥) − 𝑔(𝑥)|: 𝑥 ∈ [𝑎, 𝑏]}

≤ sup{|𝑓(𝑥)| + |𝑔(𝑥)|: 𝑥 ∈ [𝑎, 𝑏]}

≤ 𝑠𝑢𝑝 {𝐾1 + 𝐾2 : 𝑥 ∈ [𝑎, 𝑏] }

= 𝐾1 + 𝐾2

= 𝐾 (say), a positive constant.

𝑑(𝑓, 𝑔) ≤ 𝐾, ∀ 𝑥 ∈ [𝑎, 𝑏]

Thus foe every pair of points 𝑓, 𝑔 ∈ 𝐶[𝑎, 𝑏], 𝑑(𝑓, 𝑔) always represents a definite real
number and hence d is well defined.

Next we want to show that d is a metric on 𝐶[𝑎, 𝑏].

𝑚1 ). we have |𝑓(𝑥) − 𝑔(𝑥)| ≥ 0 ∀ 𝑥 ∈ [𝑎, 𝑏]


⟹ sup{|𝑓(𝑥) − 𝑔(𝑥)|: 𝑥 ∈ [𝑎, 𝑏]} ≥ 0

⟹ 𝑑(𝑓, 𝑔) ≥ 0 ∀ 𝑓, 𝑔 ∈ 𝐶[𝑎, 𝑏]

𝑚2 ). 𝑑2 (𝑥, 𝑦) = 0

⇔ sup{|𝑓(𝑥) − 𝑔(𝑥)|: 𝑥 ∈ [𝑎, 𝑏]} = 0

⇔ |𝑓(𝑥) − 𝑔(𝑥)| = 0

⇔ 𝑓(𝑥) − 𝑔(𝑥) = 0

⇔ 𝑓(𝑥) = 𝑔(𝑥)

⇔ 𝑓=𝑔

∴ 𝑑(𝑓, 𝑔) = 0 ⇔ 𝑓 = 𝑔 ∀ 𝑓, 𝑔 ∈ 𝐶[𝑎, 𝑏]

𝑚3 ). 𝑑(𝑓, 𝑔) = sup{|𝑓(𝑥) − 𝑔(𝑥)|: 𝑥 ∈ [𝑎, 𝑏]}

= sup{|𝑔(𝑥) − 𝑓(𝑥)|: 𝑥 ∈ [𝑎, 𝑏]}

= 𝑑(𝑔, 𝑓)

∴ 𝑑(𝑓, 𝑔) = 𝑑(𝑔, 𝑓) ∀ 𝑓, 𝑔 ∈ 𝐶[𝑎, 𝑏]

𝑚4 ). Let ℎ ∈ 𝐶[𝑎, 𝑏]

Now 𝑑(𝑓, 𝑔) = sup{|𝑓(𝑥) − 𝑔(𝑥)|: 𝑥 ∈ [𝑎, 𝑏]}

= sup{|𝑓(𝑥) − ℎ(𝑥) + ℎ(𝑥) − 𝑔(𝑥)|: 𝑥 ∈ [𝑎, 𝑏]}

≤ sup{|𝑓(𝑥) − ℎ(𝑥)|: 𝑥 ∈ [𝑎, 𝑏]} + sup{|ℎ(𝑥) − 𝑔(𝑥)|: 𝑥 ∈ [𝑎, 𝑏]}

= 𝑑(𝑓, ℎ) + 𝑑(ℎ, 𝑔)

∴ 𝑑(𝑓, 𝑔) ≤ 𝑑(𝑓, ℎ) + 𝑑(ℎ, 𝑔) ∀ 𝑓, 𝑔, ℎ ∈ 𝐶[𝑎, 𝑏]

Consequently the results 𝑚1 , 𝑚2 , 𝑚3 and 𝑚4 together imply that 𝑑 is a metric on


𝐶[𝑎, 𝑏] and hence (𝐶[𝑎, 𝑏], 𝑑) is a metric space.
(2). Here 𝐶[𝑎, 𝑏] = {𝑓 |𝑓: [𝑎, 𝑏] → ℝ & 𝑓 𝑖𝑠 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑖𝑛𝑜𝑢𝑠} and
𝜌: 𝐶[𝑎, 𝑏] × 𝐶[𝑎, 𝑏] ⟶ ℝ is a map defined by

𝑏
𝜌(𝑓, 𝑔) = ∫𝑎 |𝑓(𝑥) − 𝑔(𝑥)|𝑑𝑥

We first want to show that 𝜌 is well defined

Since the difference of two continuous functions is a continuous


function 𝑓 − 𝑔 is also continuous. Since the Riemann integration on a continous
𝑏
function always exists, so ∫𝑎 |𝑓(𝑥) − 𝑔(𝑥)|𝑑𝑥 exists.

Thus for every pair of points 𝑓, 𝑔 ∈ 𝐶[𝑎, 𝑏], 𝜌(𝑓, 𝑔) always represents a definite real
number and hence d is well defined.

Next we want to show that d is a metric on 𝐶[𝑎, 𝑏].

𝑚1 ). we have |𝑓(𝑥) − 𝑔(𝑥)| ≥ 0 ∀ 𝑥 ∈ [𝑎, 𝑏]


𝑏
⟹ ∫𝑎 |𝑓(𝑥) − 𝑔(𝑥)|𝑑𝑥 ≥ 0
⟹ 𝜌(𝑓, 𝑔) ≥ 0 ∀ 𝑓, 𝑔 ∈ 𝐶[𝑎, 𝑏]
𝑚2 ). 𝜌(𝑓, 𝑔) = 0
𝑏
⇔ ∫𝑎 |𝑓(𝑥) − 𝑔(𝑥)|𝑑𝑥 = 0
⇔ |𝑓(𝑥) − 𝑔(𝑥)| = 0
⇔ 𝑓(𝑥) − 𝑔(𝑥) = 0
⇔ 𝑓(𝑥) = 𝑔(𝑥)
⇔ 𝑓=𝑔
∴ 𝜌(𝑓, 𝑔) = 0 ⇔ 𝑓 = 𝑔 ∀ 𝑓, 𝑔 ∈ 𝐶[𝑎, 𝑏]

𝑏
∫𝑎 |𝑓(𝑥)|𝑑𝑥 = 0 ⇒ |𝑓(𝑥)| = 0

𝑏
𝑚3 ). 𝜌(𝑓, 𝑔) = ∫𝑎 |𝑓(𝑥) − 𝑔(𝑥)|𝑑𝑥

𝑏
= ∫𝑎 |𝑔(𝑥) − 𝑓(𝑥)|𝑑𝑥

= 𝑑(𝑔, 𝑓)
∴ 𝑑(𝑓, 𝑔) = 𝑑(𝑔, 𝑓) ∀ 𝑓, 𝑔 ∈ 𝐶[𝑎, 𝑏]

𝑚4 ). Let ℎ ∈ 𝐶[𝑎, 𝑏]

𝑏
Now 𝜌(𝑓, 𝑔) = ∫𝑎 |𝑓(𝑥) − 𝑔(𝑥)|𝑑𝑥

𝑏
= ∫𝑎 |𝑓(𝑥) − ℎ(𝑥) + ℎ(𝑥) − 𝑔(𝑥)| 𝑑𝑥

𝑏 𝑏
≤ ∫𝑎 |𝑓(𝑥) − ℎ(𝑥)|𝑑𝑥 + ∫𝑎 |ℎ(𝑥) − 𝑔(𝑥)|𝑑𝑥

= 𝜌(𝑓, ℎ) + 𝜌(ℎ, 𝑔)

∴ 𝜌(𝑓, 𝑔) ≤ 𝜌(𝑓, ℎ) + 𝜌(ℎ, 𝑔) ∀ 𝑓, 𝑔, ℎ ∈ 𝐶[𝑎, 𝑏]

Consequently the results 𝑚1 , 𝑚2 , 𝑚3 and 𝑚4 together imply that 𝜌 is a metric on


𝐶[𝑎, 𝑏] and hence (𝐶[𝑎, 𝑏], 𝜌) is a metric space.

7. Let 𝑋 consists of all real sequences = {𝑥𝑛 }∞


𝑛=1 . Prove that 𝑋 is a metric space with


|𝑥𝑛 −𝑦𝑛 |
respect to the metric 𝑑 defined by 𝑑(𝑥, 𝑦) = 2𝑛 [1+|𝑥𝑛 −𝑦𝑛 |]
n =1

Solution: -Here 𝑋 = {𝑥 = {𝑥𝑛 }∞


𝑛=1 |𝑥𝑛 ′𝑠 ∈ ℝ} and 𝑑: 𝑋 × 𝑋 → ℝ is a map defined by

 |𝑥𝑛 − 𝑦𝑛 |
𝑑(𝑥, 𝑦) = 
n =1
2𝑛 [1 + |𝑥𝑛 − 𝑦𝑛 |]

We first want to show that d is well defined.

We have |𝑥𝑛 − 𝑦𝑛 | ≥ 0 ∀𝑛 ∈ ℕ

⟹ 1 + |𝑥𝑛 − 𝑦𝑛 | ≥ 1 ∀𝑛 ∈ ℕ

Now |𝑥𝑛 − 𝑦𝑛 | < |𝑥𝑛 − 𝑦𝑛 | + 1 ∀𝑛 ∈ ℕ

|𝑥𝑛 −𝑦𝑛 |
⟹ <1 ∀𝑛 ∈ ℕ
1+|𝑥𝑛 −𝑦𝑛 |
|𝑥𝑛 −𝑦𝑛 | 1
⟹ 𝑛
< 2𝑛 ∀𝑛 ∈ ℕ
2 [1+|𝑥𝑛 −𝑦𝑛 |]

  1

 
|𝑥𝑛 −𝑦𝑛 | 1 2
⟹ < = 1 =1 ∀𝑛 ∈ ℕ
2𝑛 [1+|𝑥𝑛 −𝑦𝑛 |] 2𝑛 1−
n =1 n =1 2

⟹ 𝑑(𝑥, 𝑦) ≤ 1

Thus for every pair of points (𝑥, 𝑦) ∈ 𝑋, 𝑑(𝑥, 𝑦) always takes a definite real number
and hence d is well defined.

Next we want to show that d is a metric on X.

𝑚1 ). We have |𝑥𝑛 − 𝑦𝑛 | ≥ 0, ∀𝑛 ∈ ℕ

& 1 + |𝑥𝑛 − 𝑦𝑛 | ≥ 1 ∀𝑛 ∈ ℕ

|𝑥 −𝑦𝑛 |
⟹ 1+|𝑥𝑛 ≥0 ∀𝑛 ∈ ℕ
𝑛 −𝑦𝑛 |

𝑛 |𝑥 −𝑦𝑛 |
⟹ 2𝑛[1+|𝑥 ≥0 ∀𝑛 ∈ ℕ
𝑛 −𝑦𝑛 |]


|𝑥𝑛 −𝑦𝑛 |
⟹ 𝑛 ≥0
2 [1+|𝑥𝑛 −𝑦𝑛 |]
n =1

⟹ 𝑑(𝑥, 𝑦) ≥ 0 ∀ 𝑥, 𝑦 ∈ 𝑋

𝑚2 ). 𝑑(𝑥, 𝑦) = 0


|𝑥𝑛 −𝑦𝑛 |
⇔ =0
2𝑛 [1+|𝑥𝑛 −𝑦𝑛 |]
n =1

|𝑥𝑛 −𝑦𝑛 |
⇔ =0 ∀𝑛 ∈ ℕ
2𝑛 [1+|𝑥𝑛 −𝑦𝑛 |]

⇔ |𝑥𝑛 − 𝑦𝑛 | = 0 ∀𝑛 ∈ ℕ

⇔ 𝑥𝑛 − 𝑦𝑛 = 0

⇔ 𝑥𝑛 = 𝑦𝑛
⇔ 𝑥=𝑦

∴ 𝑑(𝑥, 𝑦) = 0 ⇔ 𝑥 = 𝑦 ∀ 𝑥, 𝑦 ∈ 𝑋


|𝑥𝑛 −𝑦𝑛 |
𝑚3 ). 𝑑(𝑥, 𝑦) = 2𝑛 [1+|𝑥𝑛 −𝑦𝑛 |]
n =1


|𝑦𝑛 −𝑥𝑛 |
= 2𝑛 [1+|𝑦𝑛 −𝑥𝑛 |]
n =1

= 𝑑(𝑦, 𝑥)

∴ 𝑑(𝑥, 𝑦) = 𝑑(𝑦, 𝑥) ∀ 𝑥, 𝑦 ∈ 𝑋

𝑚4 ). Let 𝑧 = {𝑧𝑛 }∞
𝑛=1 ∈ 𝑋

|𝑥𝑛 −𝑦𝑛 | 1
Now = 1 − 1+|𝑥
1+|𝑥𝑛 −𝑦𝑛 | 𝑛 −𝑦𝑛 |

1
≤ 1 − 1+|𝑥
𝑛 −𝑧𝑛 |+|𝑧𝑛 −𝑦𝑛 |

|𝑥 −𝑧𝑛 |+|𝑧𝑛 −𝑦𝑛 |


= 1+|𝑥𝑛
𝑛 −𝑧𝑛 |+|𝑧𝑛 −𝑦𝑛 |

|𝑥𝑛 −𝑧𝑛 | |𝑧𝑛 −𝑦𝑛 |


= 1+|𝑥 + 1+|𝑥
𝑛 −𝑧𝑛 |+|𝑧𝑛 −𝑦𝑛 | 𝑛 −𝑧𝑛 |+|𝑧𝑛 −𝑦𝑛 |

|𝑥 −𝑧𝑛 | |𝑧 −𝑦𝑛 |
≤ 1+|𝑥𝑛 |
+ 1+|𝑧𝑛
𝑛 −𝑧𝑛 𝑛 −𝑦𝑛 |

|𝑥𝑛 − 𝑦𝑛 | |𝑥𝑛 − 𝑧𝑛 | |𝑧𝑛 − 𝑦𝑛 |


∴ ≤ 𝑛 + 𝑛
2𝑛 [1 + |𝑥𝑛 − 𝑦𝑛 |] 2 [1 + |𝑥𝑛 − 𝑧𝑛 |] 2 [1 + |𝑧𝑛 − 𝑦𝑛 |]

 |𝑥𝑛 − 𝑦𝑛 |  |𝑥𝑛 − 𝑧𝑛 |  |𝑧𝑛 − 𝑦𝑛 |


⟹ 
n =1
𝑛
2 [1 + |𝑥𝑛 − 𝑦𝑛 |]
≤ 
n =1
𝑛
2 [1 + |𝑥𝑛 − 𝑧𝑛 |]
+ 
n =1
2𝑛 [1+ |𝑧𝑛 − 𝑦𝑛 |]

⟹ 𝑑(𝑥, 𝑦) ≤ 𝑑(𝑥, 𝑧) + 𝑑(𝑧, 𝑦) ∀ 𝑥, 𝑦, 𝑧 ∈ 𝑋

∴ 𝑑(𝑥, 𝑦) ≤ 𝑑(𝑥, 𝑧) + 𝑑(𝑧, 𝑦) ∀ 𝑥, 𝑦, 𝑧 ∈ 𝑋

Consequently the results 𝑚1 , 𝑚2 , 𝑚3 and 𝑚4 together imply that 𝑑 is a metric on 𝑋 and


hence (𝑋, 𝑑) is a metric space.
8. Prove that the product of two metric spaces is a metric space.

Solution: -

Let (𝑋1 , 𝑑1 ) and (𝑋2 , 𝑑2 ) be two metric spaces.

Let 𝑋 = 𝑋1 × 𝑋2

= {𝑥 = (𝑥1 , 𝑥2 ) |𝑥𝑥1 ∈𝑋
∈𝑋
1
}
2 2

We define a map 𝑑: 𝑋 × 𝑋 ⟶ ℝ

𝑥=(𝑥1 ,𝑥2 )
𝑑(𝑥, 𝑦) = √𝑑12 (𝑥1 , 𝑦1 ) + 𝑑22 (𝑥2 , 𝑦2 ) where 𝑦=(𝑦 ,𝑦 )
∈𝑋
1 2

We need to show that d is a metric on 𝑋.

𝑚1 ). Let 𝑥 = (𝑥1 , 𝑥2 ) & 𝑦 = (𝑦1 , 𝑦2 ) ∈ 𝑋 Then 𝑥1 , 𝑦1 ∈ 𝑋1 & 𝑥2 , 𝑦2 ∈ 𝑋2

Since 𝑑1 and 𝑑2 are metrics, so

𝑑1 (𝑥1 , 𝑦1 ) ≥ 0 & 𝑑2 (𝑥2 , 𝑦2 ) ≥ 0

⟹ 𝑑12 (𝑥1 , 𝑦1 ) ≥ 0 & 𝑑22 (𝑥2 , 𝑦2 ) ≥ 0

⟹ 𝑑12 (𝑥1 , 𝑦1 ) ≥ 0 + 𝑑22 (𝑥2 , 𝑦2 ) ≥ 0

⟹ √𝑑12 (𝑥1 , 𝑦1 ) + 𝑑22 (𝑥2 , 𝑦2 ) ≥ 0 [Taking positive square root]

⟹ 𝑑(𝑥, 𝑦) ≥ 0 ∀ 𝑥, 𝑦 ∈ 𝑋

𝑚2 ). 𝑑(𝑥, 𝑦) = 0

⇔ √𝑑12 (𝑥1 , 𝑦1 ) + 𝑑22 (𝑥2 , 𝑦2 ) = 0

⇔ 𝑑12 (𝑥1 , 𝑦1 ) + 𝑑22 (𝑥2 , 𝑦2 ) = 0

⇔ 𝑑12 (𝑥1 , 𝑦1 ) = 0 & 𝑑22 (𝑥2 , 𝑦2 ) = 0

⇔ 𝑑1 (𝑥1 , 𝑦1 ) = 0 & 𝑑2 (𝑥2 , 𝑦2 ) = 0


⇔ 𝑥1 = 𝑦1 & 𝑥2 = 𝑦2

⇔ 𝑥=𝑦

∴ 𝑑(𝑥, 𝑦) = 0 ⇔ 𝑥 = 𝑦 ∀ 𝑥, 𝑦 ∈ 𝑋

𝑚3 ). 𝑑(𝑥, 𝑦) = √𝑑12 (𝑥1 , 𝑦1 ) + 𝑑22 (𝑥2 , 𝑦2 )

= √𝑑12 (𝑦1 , 𝑥1 ) + 𝑑22 (𝑦2 , 𝑥2 )

= 𝑑(𝑦, 𝑥)

∴ 𝑑(𝑥, 𝑦) = 𝑑(𝑦, 𝑥) ∀ 𝑥, 𝑦 ∈ 𝑋

𝑚4 ). Let 𝑧 = (𝑧1 , 𝑧2 ) ∈ 𝑋

Now 𝑑(𝑥, 𝑦) = √𝑑12 (𝑥1 , 𝑦1 ) + 𝑑22 (𝑥2 , 𝑦2 )

≤ √[𝑑1 (𝑥1 , 𝑧1 ) + 𝑑1 (𝑧1 , 𝑦1 )]2 + [ 𝑑2 (𝑧2 , 𝑦2 ) + 𝑑2 (𝑧2 , 𝑦2 )]2

≤ √𝑑12 (𝑥1 , 𝑧1 ) + 𝑑22 (𝑥2 , 𝑧2 ) + √𝑑12 (𝑧1 , 𝑦1 ) + 𝑑22 (𝑧2 , 𝑦2 )

= 𝑑(𝑥, 𝑧) + 𝑑(𝑧, 𝑦) [By Minlowski’s Inequality]

∴ 𝑑(𝑥, 𝑦) ≤ 𝑑(𝑥, 𝑧) + 𝑑(𝑧, 𝑦) ∀ 𝑥, 𝑦, 𝑧 ∈ 𝑋

Consequently the results 𝑚1 , 𝑚2 , 𝑚3 and 𝑚4 together imply that 𝑑 is a metric on 𝑋 and


hence (𝑋, 𝑑) is a metric space.

9. Prove that the product of n metric spaces is a metric space.

Solution: - Let (𝑋1 , 𝑑1 ), (𝑋2 , 𝑑2 ), … … (𝑋𝑛 , 𝑑𝑛 ) be n metric spaces.

Let 𝑋 = 𝑋1 × 𝑋2 × … … × 𝑋𝑛

𝑥 = (𝑥1 , 𝑥2 , … 𝑥𝑛 ), 𝑦 = (𝑦1 , 𝑦2 , … 𝑦𝑛 ) be two elements of X then we define a map

1
n 2
𝑑: 𝑋 × 𝑋 → ℝ by 𝑑(𝑥, 𝑦) = [  𝑑𝑖2 (𝑥𝑖 , 𝑦𝑖 )]
i =1
We want to show that d is a metric on 𝑋.

𝑚1 ). Since 𝑑𝑖′ 𝑠 are metrics.

𝑑𝑖 (𝑥𝑖 , 𝑦𝑖 ) ≥ 0 ∀ 𝑖 = 1,2,3 … … 𝑛

⟹ 𝑑𝑖2 (𝑥𝑖 , 𝑦𝑖 ) ≥ 0 ∀ 𝑖 = 1,2,3 … … 𝑛

1
n 2
⟹ [  𝑑𝑖2 (𝑥𝑖 , 𝑦𝑖 )] ≥ 0 [taking the square root]
i =1

⟹ 𝑑(𝑥, 𝑦) ≥ 0 ∀ 𝑥, 𝑦 ∈ 𝑋

𝑚2 ). 𝑑(𝑥, 𝑦) = 0

1
n 2
⇔ [  𝑑𝑖2 (𝑥𝑖 , 𝑦𝑖 )] = 0
i =1

n
⇔ 
i =1
𝑑𝑖2 (𝑥𝑖 , 𝑦𝑖 ) = 0

⇔ 𝑑𝑖2 (𝑥𝑖 , 𝑦𝑖 ) = 0 ∀ 𝑛 = 1,2,3 … … 𝑛

⇔ 𝑑𝑖 (𝑥𝑖 , 𝑦𝑖 ) = 0 ∀ 𝑛 = 1,2,3 … … 𝑛

⇔ 𝑥𝑖 = 𝑦𝑖 ∀ 𝑛 = 1,2,3 … … 𝑛 , [Since 𝑑𝑖′ 𝑠 𝑎𝑟𝑒 𝑚𝑒𝑡𝑟𝑖𝑐𝑒𝑠]

⇔ 𝑥=𝑦

∴ 𝑑(𝑥, 𝑦) = 0 ⇔ 𝑥 = 𝑦 ∀ 𝑥, 𝑦 ∈ 𝑙2

1
n 2
𝑚3 ). 𝑑(𝑥, 𝑦) = [  𝑑𝑖2 (𝑥𝑖 , 𝑦𝑖 )]
i =1
1
n 2
= [  𝑑𝑖2 (𝑦𝑖 , 𝑥𝑖 )]
i =1

= 𝑑(𝑦, 𝑥)

∴ 𝑑(𝑥, 𝑦) = 𝑑(𝑦, 𝑥) ∀ 𝑥, 𝑦 ∈ 𝑋

𝑚4 ). Let 𝑧 = (𝑧1 , 𝑧2 , … 𝑧𝑛 ) ∈ 𝑋

1
n 2
Now 𝑑(𝑥, 𝑦) = [  𝑑𝑖2 (𝑥𝑖 , 𝑦𝑖 )]
i =1

1
n 2
≤ [  {𝑑𝑖 (𝑥𝑖 , 𝑧𝑖 ) + 𝑑𝑖 (𝑧𝑖 , 𝑦𝑖 )}2 ]
i =1

1 1
n 2 n 2
≤ [  𝑑𝑖2 (𝑥𝑖 , 𝑧𝑖 )] + [  𝑑𝑖2 (𝑧𝑖 , 𝑦𝑖 )]
i =1 i =1

[By Minkowski’s inequality]

= 𝑑(𝑥, 𝑧) + 𝑑(𝑧, 𝑦) ∀ 𝑥, 𝑦, 𝑧 ∈ 𝑋

∴ 𝑑(𝑥, 𝑦) ≤ 𝑑(𝑥, 𝑧) + 𝑑(𝑧, 𝑦) ∀ 𝑥, 𝑦, 𝑧 ∈ 𝑋

Consequently the results 𝑚1 , 𝑚2 , 𝑚3 and 𝑚4 together imply that 𝑑 is a metric on 𝑋 and


hence (𝑋, 𝑑) is a metric space.
10. Let 𝑋 = 𝑋1 × 𝑋2 × … … × 𝑋𝑛 . Show that X is a metric space with respect to a metric
n
𝜌 defined by 𝜌(𝑥, 𝑦) = i =1
𝑑𝑖 (𝑥𝑖 , 𝑦𝑖 )

Solution: - Let (𝑋1 , 𝑑1 ), (𝑋2 , 𝑑2 ), … … (𝑋𝑛 , 𝑑𝑛 ) be n metric spaces.

Here 𝑋 = 𝑋1 × 𝑋2 × … … × 𝑋𝑛

Let 𝑥 = (𝑥1 , 𝑥2 , … 𝑥𝑛 ), 𝑦 = (𝑦1 , 𝑦2 , … 𝑦𝑛 ) be two elements of 𝑋

n
We define a map 𝜌: 𝑋 × 𝑋 → ℝ by 𝜌(𝑥, 𝑦) = i =1
𝑑𝑖 (𝑥𝑖 , 𝑦𝑖 )

We want to show that 𝜌 is a metric on 𝑋.

𝑚1 ). we have 𝑑𝑖 (𝑥𝑖 , 𝑦𝑖 ) ≥ 0 ∀ 𝑖 = 1,2,3 … … 𝑛

n
⟹ i =1
𝑑𝑖 (𝑥𝑖 , 𝑦𝑖 ) ≥ 0

⟹ 𝜌(𝑥, 𝑦) ≥ 0 ∀ 𝑥, 𝑦 ∈ 𝑋

𝑚2 ). 𝜌(𝑥, 𝑦) = 0

n
⇔ i =1
𝑑𝑖 (𝑥𝑖 , 𝑦𝑖 ) = 0

⇔ 𝑑𝑖 (𝑥𝑖 , 𝑦𝑖 ) = 0 ∀ 𝑖 = 1,2,3 … … 𝑛

⇔ 𝑥𝑖 = 𝑦𝑖 ∀ 𝑖 = 1,2,3 … … 𝑛 [Since 𝑑𝑖′ 𝑠 𝑎𝑟𝑒 𝑚𝑒𝑡𝑟𝑖𝑐𝑒𝑠]

⇔ 𝑥=𝑦

∴ 𝜌(𝑥, 𝑦) = 0 ⇔ 𝑥 = 𝑦 ∀ 𝑥, 𝑦 ∈ ℝ𝑛

n
𝑚3 ). 𝜌(𝑥, 𝑦) = 
i =1
𝑑𝑖 (𝑥𝑖 , 𝑦𝑖 )
n
= 
i =1
𝑑𝑖 (𝑦𝑖 , 𝑥𝑖 ) [By Symmetric properties of 𝑑𝑖 ′𝑠]

= 𝜌(𝑦, 𝑥)

∴ 𝜌(𝑥, 𝑦) = 𝜌(𝑦, 𝑥) ∀ 𝑥, 𝑦 ∈ 𝑋

𝑚4 ). Let 𝑧 = (𝑧1 , 𝑧2 , 𝑧3 , … … 𝑧𝑛 ) ∈ 𝑋

n
Now 𝜌(𝑥, 𝑦) = i =1
𝑑𝑖 (𝑥𝑖 , 𝑦𝑖 )

n
= 
i =1
𝑑𝑖 (𝑥𝑖 , 𝑧𝑖 ) + 𝑑𝑖 (𝑧𝑖 , 𝑦𝑖 )

n n
≤ i =1
𝑑𝑖 (𝑥𝑖 , 𝑧𝑖 ) + 
i =1
𝑑𝑖 (𝑧𝑖 , 𝑦𝑖 )

= 𝜌(𝑥, 𝑧) + 𝜌(𝑧, 𝑦)

∴ 𝜌(𝑥, 𝑦) ≤ 𝜌(𝑥, 𝑧) + 𝜌(𝑧, 𝑦) ∀ 𝑥, 𝑦, 𝑧 ∈ 𝑋

Consequently the results 𝑚1 , 𝑚2 , 𝑚3 and 𝑚4 together imply that 𝜌 is a metric on 𝑋 and


hence (𝑋, 𝜌) is a metric space.

𝑑(𝑥,𝑦)
11. Let (𝑋, 𝑑) be a metric space. If we define a map 𝜌 by 𝜌(𝑥, 𝑦) = 1+𝑑(𝑥, 𝑦)

∀ 𝑥, 𝑦, 𝑧 ∈ 𝑋. Prove that 𝜌 is also a metric on X.


Solution: - Here (𝑋, 𝑑) be a metric space and 𝜌: 𝑋 × 𝑋 → ℝ be a map defined by
𝑑(𝑥,𝑦)
𝜌(𝑥, 𝑦) = 1+𝑑(𝑥, ∀ 𝑥, 𝑦 ∈ 𝑋
𝑦)

𝑚1 ). Since 𝑑𝑖′ 𝑠 are metrics.


𝑑(𝑥, 𝑦) ≥ 0 [∵ 𝑑 is a metric]
⟹ 1 + 𝑑(𝑥, 𝑦) ≥ 0
𝑑(𝑥,𝑦)
⟹ 1+𝑑(𝑥,𝑦) ≥ 0

⟹ 𝜌(𝑥, 𝑦) ≥ 0 ∀ 𝑥, 𝑦 ∈ 𝑋
𝑚2 ). 𝜌(𝑥, 𝑦) = 0
𝑑(𝑥,𝑦)
⇔ =0
1+𝑑(𝑥, 𝑦)

⇔ 𝑑(𝑥, 𝑦) = 0
⇔ 𝑥=𝑦
∴ 𝜌(𝑥, 𝑦) = 0 ⇔ 𝑥 = 𝑦 ∀ 𝑥, 𝑦 ∈ 𝑋

𝑑(𝑥,𝑦)
𝑚3 ). 𝜌(𝑥, 𝑦) = 1+𝑑(𝑥, 𝑦)
𝑑(𝑦, 𝑥)
=
1+𝑑(𝑦, 𝑥)

= 𝜌(𝑦, 𝑥)
∴ 𝜌(𝑥, 𝑦) = 𝜌(𝑦, 𝑥) ∀ 𝑥, 𝑦 ∈ 𝑋

𝑚4 ). Let 𝑥, 𝑦, 𝑧 ∈ 𝑋
𝑑(𝑥,𝑦) 1
Now = 1 − 1+𝑑(𝑥,𝑦)
1+𝑑(𝑥, 𝑦)
1
≤ 1 − 1+𝑑(𝑥,𝑧)+𝑑(𝑧,𝑦)
𝑑(𝑥,𝑧)+𝑑(𝑧,𝑦)
=
1+𝑑(𝑥,𝑧)+𝑑(𝑧,𝑦)
𝑑(𝑥,𝑧) 𝑑(𝑧,𝑦)
= + 1+𝑑(𝑥,𝑧)+𝑑(𝑧,𝑦)
1+𝑑(𝑥,𝑧)+𝑑(𝑧,𝑦)

𝑑(𝑥,𝑧) 𝑑(𝑧,𝑦)
≤ + 1+𝑑(𝑧,𝑦)
1+𝑑(𝑥,𝑧)

= 𝜌(𝑥, 𝑧) + 𝜌(𝑧, 𝑦) ∀ 𝑥, 𝑦, 𝑧 ∈ 𝑋
∴ 𝜌(𝑥, 𝑦) ≤ 𝜌(𝑥, 𝑧) + 𝜌(𝑧, 𝑦) ∀ 𝑥, 𝑦, 𝑧 ∈ 𝑋
Consequently the results 𝑚1 , 𝑚2 , 𝑚3 and 𝑚4 together imply that 𝜌 is a metric on 𝑋 and
hence (𝑋, 𝜌) is a metric space.
12. Let X be a metric space with respect to two metrics 𝑑1 and 𝑑2 . If we define a map 𝜌
by 𝜌(𝑥, 𝑦) = 𝑑1 (𝑥, 𝑦) + 𝑑2 (𝑥, 𝑦) , ∀ 𝑥, 𝑦, 𝑧 ∈ 𝑋.
Solution: -
Here 𝑋 be a metric space with respect to two metrics 𝑑1 and 𝑑2 .
We define a map 𝜌: 𝑋 × 𝑋 → ℝ by
𝜌(𝑥, 𝑦) = 𝑑1 (𝑥, 𝑦) + 𝑑2 (𝑥, 𝑦) , ∀ 𝑥, 𝑦, 𝑧 ∈ 𝑋.
We want to show that 𝜌 is a metric on 𝑋
𝑚1 ). Since 𝑑1 and 𝑑2 are metrics
∴ 𝑑1 (𝑥, 𝑦) ≥ 0 and 𝑑2 (𝑥, 𝑦) ≥ 0
⟹ 𝑑1 (𝑥, 𝑦) + 𝑑2 (𝑥, 𝑦) ≥ 0
⟹ 𝜌(𝑥, 𝑦) ≥ 0 ∀ 𝑥, 𝑦 ∈ 𝑋
𝑚2 ). 𝜌(𝑥, 𝑦) = 0
⇔ 𝑑1 (𝑥, 𝑦) + 𝑑2 (𝑥, 𝑦) = 0
⇔ 𝑑1 (𝑥, 𝑦) = 0 & 𝑑2 (𝑥, 𝑦) = 0
⇔ 𝑥=𝑦
∴ 𝜌(𝑥, 𝑦) = 0 ⇔ 𝑥 = 𝑦 ∀ 𝑥, 𝑦 ∈ 𝑋
𝑚3 ). 𝜌(𝑥, 𝑦) = 𝑑1 (𝑥, 𝑦) + 𝑑2 (𝑥, 𝑦)
= 𝑑1 (𝑦, 𝑥) + 𝑑2 (𝑦, 𝑥) [By symmetric properties in 𝑑1 & 𝑑2 ]
= 𝜌(𝑦, 𝑥)
∴ 𝜌(𝑥, 𝑦) = 𝜌(𝑦, 𝑥) ∀ 𝑥, 𝑦 ∈ 𝑋

𝑚4 ). Let 𝑥, 𝑦, 𝑧 ∈ 𝑋
Now 𝜌(𝑥, 𝑦) = 𝑑1 (𝑥, 𝑦) + 𝑑2 (𝑥, 𝑦)
≤ 𝑑1 (𝑥, 𝑧) + 𝑑1 (𝑧, 𝑦) + 𝑑2 (𝑥, 𝑧) + 𝑑2 (𝑧, 𝑦)
[ Since 𝑑1 & 𝑑2 are metrices]
= 𝑑1 (𝑥, 𝑧) + 𝑑2 (𝑥, 𝑧) + 𝑑1 (𝑧, 𝑦) + 𝑑2 (𝑧, 𝑦)
= 𝜌(𝑥, 𝑧) + 𝜌(𝑧, 𝑦) [By Minlowski’s
Inequality]
∴ 𝜌(𝑥, 𝑦) ≤ 𝜌(𝑥, 𝑧) + 𝜌(𝑧, 𝑦) ∀ 𝑥, 𝑦, 𝑧 ∈ 𝑋
Consequently the results 𝑚1 , 𝑚2 , 𝑚3 and 𝑚4 together imply that 𝜌 is a metric on 𝑋 and
hence (𝑋, 𝜌) is a metric space.
13. Let (𝑋, 𝑑) is a metric spaces if we define a map 𝜌 by 𝜌(𝑥, 𝑦) = min {1, 𝑑(𝑥, 𝑦)}.
Prove that 𝜌 is also a metric on X.
Solution: -
Here (𝑋, 𝑑) is a metric space.
We define a map 𝜌: 𝑋 × 𝑋 → ℝ by
𝜌(𝑥, 𝑦) = min {1, 𝑑(𝑥, 𝑦)}
We want to show that 𝜌 is a metric on 𝑋
𝑚1 ). Since 𝑑 is a metric
∴ 𝑑(𝑥, 𝑦) ≥ 0 ∀ 𝑥, 𝑦 ∈ 𝑋
Again we also know that 1 > 0
∴ min {1, 𝑑(𝑥, 𝑦)} ≥ 0
⟹ 𝜌(𝑥, 𝑦) ≥ 0 ∀ 𝑥, 𝑦 ∈ 𝑋

𝑚2 ). 𝜌(𝑥, 𝑦) = 0
⇔ min {1, 𝑑(𝑥, 𝑦)} = 0
⇔ {1, 𝑑(𝑥, 𝑦)} = 0
⇔ 𝑑(𝑥, 𝑦) = 0 [∵ 1 ≠ 0]
⇔ 𝑥=𝑦 [Since 𝑑 is a metric]
∴ 𝜌(𝑥, 𝑦) = 0 ⇔ 𝑥 = 𝑦 ∀ 𝑥, 𝑦 ∈ 𝑋
𝑚3 ). 𝜌(𝑥, 𝑦) = min {1, 𝑑(𝑥, 𝑦)}
= min {1, 𝑑(𝑦, 𝑥)} [By symmetric properties in 𝑑1 & 𝑑2 ]
= 𝜌(𝑦, 𝑥)
∴ 𝜌(𝑥, 𝑦) = 𝜌(𝑦, 𝑥) ∀ 𝑥, 𝑦 ∈ 𝑋
𝑚4 ). Let 𝑥, 𝑦, 𝑧 ∈ 𝑋
Now 𝜌(𝑥, 𝑦) = min {1, 𝑑(𝑥, 𝑦)}
≤ min {1, 𝑑(𝑥, 𝑧) + 𝑑(𝑧, 𝑦)}
≤ min{1, 𝑑(𝑥, 𝑧)} + min{1, 𝑑(𝑧, 𝑦)}
[ Since 𝑑1 & 𝑑2 are metrices]
= 𝜌(𝑥, 𝑧) + 𝜌(𝑧, 𝑦) [By Minlowski’s Inequality]
∴ 𝜌(𝑥, 𝑦) ≤ 𝜌(𝑥, 𝑧) + 𝜌(𝑧, 𝑦) ∀ 𝑥, 𝑦, 𝑧 ∈ 𝑋
Consequently the results 𝑚1 , 𝑚2 , 𝑚3 and 𝑚4 together imply that 𝜌 is a metric on 𝑋 and
hence (𝑋, 𝜌) is a metric space.
14. Let ℝ represents the real line. We define a map 𝑑 by 𝑑(𝑥, 𝑦) =
|𝑥| + |𝑦| 𝑖𝑓 𝑥 ≠ 𝑦
⟦ . Show that d is a metric on ℝ.
0 𝑖𝑓 𝑥 = 𝑦

Solution: - Here 𝑑: ℝ × ℝ ⟶ ℝ is a map defined by

|𝑥| + |𝑦| 𝑖𝑓 𝑥 ≠ 𝑦
𝑑(𝑥, 𝑦) = ⟦
0 𝑖𝑓 𝑥 = 𝑦

We are to prove that d is a metric on ℝ.

𝑚1 ). Since |𝑥| ≥ 0 & |𝑦| ≥ 0 ∀ 𝑥, 𝑦 ∈ ℝ

⟹ |𝑥| + |𝑦| ≥ 0

⟹ 𝑑(𝑥, 𝑦) ≥ 0 ∀ 𝑥, 𝑦 ∈ ℝ [by definition of the map 𝑑]

𝑚2 ). By the given hypothesis

𝑑(𝑥, 𝑦) = 0 ⇔ 𝑥 = 𝑦 ∀ 𝑥, 𝑦 ∈ ℝ

𝑚3 ). Let x and y be any two points in ℝ.

If 𝑥 = 𝑦 then 𝑑(𝑥, 𝑦) = 0 & 𝑑(𝑦, 𝑥) = 0

So in this case 𝑑(𝑥, 𝑦) = 𝑑(𝑦, 𝑥)

If 𝑥 ≠ 𝑦 then 𝑑(𝑥, 𝑦) = |𝑥| + |𝑦|

= |𝑦| + |𝑥|

= 𝑑(𝑦, 𝑥)

∴ 𝑑(𝑥, 𝑦) = 𝑑(𝑦, 𝑥)

Hence we can conclude that 𝑑(𝑥, 𝑦) = 𝑑(𝑦, 𝑥) ∀ 𝑥, 𝑦 ∈ ℝ

𝑚4 ). Let x, y, z be any three elements in ℝ.

If 𝑥 = 𝑦 then 𝑑(𝑥, 𝑦) = 0
And 𝑑(𝑥, 𝑧) ≥ 0 𝑑(𝑧, 𝑦) ≥ 0

So in this case 𝑑(𝑥, 𝑦) ≤ 𝑑(𝑥, 𝑧) + 𝑑(𝑧, 𝑦)

Next suppose that 𝑥 ≠ 𝑦

Then 𝑑(𝑥, 𝑦) = |𝑥| + |𝑦|

≤ |𝑥| + |𝑧| + |𝑧| + |𝑦|

= 𝑑(𝑥, 𝑧) + 𝑑(𝑧, 𝑦)

∴ 𝑑(𝑥, 𝑦) ≤ 𝑑(𝑥, 𝑧) + 𝑑(𝑧, 𝑦) ∀ 𝑥, 𝑦, 𝑧 ∈ ℝ

Consequently the results 𝑚1 , 𝑚2 , 𝑚3 and 𝑚4 together imply that 𝑑 is a metric on ℝ and


hence (ℝ, 𝑑) is a metric space.

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy